Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010
Hans Desilvestro Chief Scientist 19 March 2010
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 2
• Introduction – some key advantages of DSC
• Applications – anticipated markets
• DSC roadmap
• Conclusions
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 3
First Generation Crystalline Silicon
Second Generation Thin film Semiconductor
Third Generation Artificial Photosynthesis Nanotechnology
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 4
http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/HONSHI/20080625/153868/
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 5
“DSC modules yearly generated 10–20% more electricity than conventional crystalline-Si modules of the same rated output power.” Aisin Seiki/Toyota
Gain for DSC even higher under non-optimum angle of incidence (building façades)
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 6
Dyesol data
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 7
Dyesol data
DSC c-Si
• Maximum power point voltage Vmpp of Dye Solar Cells depends much less on panel temperature compared to polycrystalline or single crystal silicon SureVoltTM
• Maximum power Pmpp of DSCs drops much less with temperature compared to Si
E. Radziemska, Renewable Energy, 28 (2003) 1.
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 8
Dyesol data
Relatively small influence of temperature on DSC performance, particularly below 60oC
no temperature compensation for DSC LCOE calculations (in a first approximation)
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 9
Sources: Meteonorm 6.0 + SAM (Solar Advisor Model NREL) Efficiency drop in summer months due to higher panel
temperatures
Efficiency drop ~mid April to August due to high per-centage of diffuse radiation and lower overall light levels
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 10
• DSC effective performance per m2 approaches Si performance on façades (20 years panel life to 80%)
• Si LCOE rises steeply with less ideal panel orientation
• DSC LCOE is almost independent of façade exposure East through West
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 11
• Silicon PV looses significant power and thus efficiency under elevated temperatures, i.e. under operating conditions
• DSC performance depends much less on temperature
• Silicon PV performs poorly under lower light conditions (because it is based on minority carrier transport)
• DSC performance (efficiency) improves with decreasing light levels and peaks around 0.2-0.3 sun, i.e. at average operating conditions (based on majority carrier transport)
• It is unlikely that silicon PV will drop significantly below 2$/Wp at the wholesale level
• DSC has the potential to reach whole- sale prices of 1$/Wp and lower
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 12
• Architectural applications: relatively high $/m2 acceptable, competition with marble
• Generation at the site of consumption, i.e. at the
consumer retail electricity price, in buildings
• No solar farms, i.e. no competition at the generator electricity price
• Multifunctional DSC PV panels:
Electrical power generation
Heat insulation
Noise insulation
Light moderation/filtering
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 13
• Architectural appeal
• Colouration
• Transparency
Nina Buthke: Architectural School Aarhus
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 14
• Large palette of colouration
• Camouflage patterns
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 15
• Coated Steel market - over 1 billion m2, growing at 7-8% pa
• Partnered with Corus (5th largest, Tata) plus interest from other steel companies to license from Dyesol/CORUS
• Potential for solar coated steel cladding 20% i.e. over 200 million m2 pa
• significant added value for Dyesol (materials, ~70$/m2)
• Addressable market ~$15 billion pa
Typical Coil Coating line
Corus Colourcoat – 100 million m2 pa Vast Colourcoat Roof
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 16
World Flat glass market
•2007 5.2 billion m2
•2010 5.2% growth per year
= 6.1 billion m2
60/40 view and non-view
DSC Technology - Addressing both markets
Dyesol Materials - At $50 - $75/m2 added value
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 17
Copyright Dyesol Limited 2010 18
• Despite DSC efficiencies still being 2x lower compared to silicon, electricity yearly produced by the two technologies become similar in façade orientation, particularly off-South (for the Northern hemisphere)
• With the exception of tracker-mounted PV, DSC provides, for the same $/Wp basis, lower LCOE than silicon PV
• Performance of façade-mounted DSC (in Cairo) hardly depends on façade orientation between SE to SW
• Even at 5% DSC panel efficiency and 2$/Wp, panel LCOE of less than 10 cts/kWh can be achieved with DSC, in most façade orientations