Upload
ashly-fulcher
View
213
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Handshake: Effects of Environment and Gender
Introduction
Past Research
Sparked our interest…Handshaking, Gender, Personality, and
First Impressions, by Chaplin et al., (2000)
Handshaking, Personality, and Psychopathology in Psychiatric Patients, a Reliability and Correlational Study, by Åström, et al., (1993)
Purpose
Examine how differences in scripts affects the participants’ handshaking characteristics
Examine how the gender of both the researchers and of the participants affects the participants’ handshaking characteristics
Hypotheses
Locus of Control & Self-EsteemScriptGender
ParticipantResearcher
Method
Participants
42 Undergraduate General Psychology Students
12 Males & 30 FemalesMean age = 19.40 yearsAll participants were treated
according to APA ethical guidelines
Materials
ScriptsCasualFormal
Surveys UsedLocus of Control
Rotter’s Internal-External Control Scale
Self-EsteemNew York State Self-
Esteem Scale
Handshake Rating ScaleLikert Scale from 1-
5GripStrengthDuration
Video Cameras
Scripts
CasualThanks for coming today. How’s your day going? All right,
before we get started, the Psych Dept. wants you to fill out these forms so that you will get credit for doing this. It’ll only take a second. All right, now you will be filling out two surveys about your personality and self-esteem. Don’t worry about them, just fill it out the best you can. We just want to find out some information about your personality and your self-esteem. When you are done, just let me know. Okay, you can go ahead and get started.
Scripts
FormalThis study is investigating personality traits. You will be asked to
fill out multiple-item surveys on personality and self-esteem, as honestly as possible. When you are finished, please turn your completed surveys into the experimenter in the front of the room. All your responses will remain anonymous. The surveys contain no marker, so your name will not be associated with any responses or results. You will be classified by gender, and a randomly assigned participant identification number will be given to your survey. Your participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time without penalty. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask one of the experimenters. Before we begin, however, I need you to fill out these forms for the Psychology Department in order for you to receive for this experiment. Thank you for your time and participation.
Handshaking Rating Scale
Strength1--------2--------3--------4--------5limp firm
Duration 1--------2--------3--------4--------5short long
Grip 1--------2--------3--------4--------5
incomplete complete
Design
2x2x2 Factorial DesignCompletely Between-Subject DesignParticipants individually runRaters blind to script
Conditions
Female Ss, Casual script, Female Rs
Female Ss, Formal script, Female Rs
Female Ss, Casual script, Male Rs
Female Ss, Formal script, Male Rs
Male Ss, Casual script, Female Rs
Male Ss, Formal script, Female Rs
Male Ss, Casual script, Male Rs
Male Ss, Formal script, Male Rs
Handshake Training
Pre-established self-rated scaleResearchers handshake based on
consistent comparison scale
ProcedureIndividual Ss brought into room
Instructions and Surveys given by Rs according to script condition
Upon completion of surveys, Rater entered room and performed handshake Rater immediately scored handshake
Ss was then debriefed
Results
Results
Multiple ANOVAsInternal/External Locus of Control
Grip p = .43 NSStrength p = .44 NSDuration p = .77 NSAverage p = .61 NS
Multiple ANOVAsSelf-Esteem (high/low)
Grip p = .68 NSStrength p = .81 NSDuration p = .74 NSAverage p = .97 NS
Results, con’t.
Results - Grip
Main EffectsGender p = .93 NSScript p = .06 *Gender of Rs p = .003 *
2-way InteractionsGender & Script p = .07 *Gender & Gender of Rs p = .07 *Script & Gender of Rs p = .16 NS
Grip, con’t.
3-way InteractionsGender, Script & Gender of Rs p = .19 NS
Grip Graph
2-way Interaction for Gender/Script & Gender/Gender of Rs
012345
Casual Formal
Script
Rat
ing
Male Ss & Male Rs Female Ss & Male RsMale Ss & Female Rs Female Ss & Female Rs
Results - Strength
Main EffectsGender p = .51 NSScript p = .02 *Gender of Rs p = .03 *
2-way InteractionsGender & Script p = .02 *Gender & Gender of Rs p = .04 *Script & Gender of Rs p = .07 *
Strength, con’t.
3-way InteractionGender, Script, & Gender of Rs p = .21 NS
Strength Graph
2-way Interaction for Gender/Script, Script/GenderRs & Gender/GenderRs
012345
Casual Formal
Script
Scor
e
Male Ss & Male Rs Female Ss & Male RsMale Ss & Female Rs Female Ss & Female Rs
Results - Duration
Main EffectsGender p = .09 *Script p = .17 NSGender of Rs p = .02 *
2-way InteractionsGender & Script p = .62 NSGender & Gender of Rs p = .20 NSScript & Gender of Rs p = .03 *
Duration, con't.
3-way InteractionGender, Script & Gender of Rs p = .02 *
Duration Graph
3-way Interaction for Gender/Script/GenderRs
012345
Casual Formal
Script
Rat
ing
Male Ss & Male Rs Female Ss & Male RsMale Ss & Female Rs Female Ss & Female Rs
Results - Average
Main EffectsGender p = .799 NSScript p = .03 *Gender of Rs p = .005 *
2-way InteractionsGender & Script p = .06 *Gender & Gender of Rs p = .05 *Script & Gender of Rs p = .04 *
Average, con’t.
3-way InteractionGender, Script & Gender of Rs p = .07 *
Average Graph
3-way Interaction for Gender/Script/Gender of Rs
012345
Casual Formal
Script
Rat
ing
Male Ss & Male Rs Female Ss & Male RsMale Ss & Female Rs Female Ss & Female Rs
Evaluation of Hypotheses
Internal/External Locus of Control & Self-EsteemNo significant results
ScriptMain effectMarginal interaction with Gender Interaction with Gender of RsMarginal interaction with Gender & Gender
of Rs
Gender of SsMarginal interaction with Script Interaction of Gender of RsMarginal interaction with Script & Gender of
Rs
Gender of RsMain effect Interaction of Gender Interaction of ScriptMarginal interaction with Gender & Script
Evaluation of Hypotheses, con’t.
What it all means...
“It Depends”
Discussion
Discussion
ImplicationsFirst Impressions
Interview Settings
Cross-cultural UnderstandingOthers Understanding the “American”
handshake
Discussion, con’t.
ShortcomingsExpose to all conditions
“Backpack Factor”
Operationally Define Casual & Formal Script
Discussion, con’t.
Future ResearchCultural Background Differences
Manipulate Environment
Different Age Groups
Conclusion
QUESTIONS??