2
The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 2013; 39(3): 217218 Copyright © Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. ISSN: 0095-2990 print/1097-9891 online DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2013.773335 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Hand Sanitizer Intoxication Following a Crude Extraction Method Michael A. Darracq, M.D., M.P.H. 1,2 , Nasim Ghafouri, Pharm.D. 2 , Amadeo Pesce, Ph.D. 3 , and F. Lee Cantrell, Pharm.D. 2 1 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA, 2 California Poison Control System, San Diego Division, San Diego, CA, USA, 3 Millenium Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA Ethanol-based hand sanitizers are recommended by many public health authorities as an alternative to wash- ing for hand hygiene (1,2). Widespread availability has given rise to a concerning trend. In recent years, there have been an increasing number of intentional inges- tions of ethanol-based hand sanitizers (3), some of which have occurred in controlled settings such as hos- pitals (4) and prisons (5). We report the case of a severe hand sanitizer intoxication which occurred in a psychia- tric facility. A 40-year-old patient in a locked psychiatric facility was found to be minimally responsive in her room along with two empty 1L bags of hand sanitizer. Emergency medical services (EMS) was contacted and the patient was intubated en route to the emergency department due to a decreased level of consciousness and respiratory depression. She was previously observed in her usual state of health. Vital signs were within normal limits upon arrival and during hospitalization. Due to the history of exposure, a blood ethanol concentration was obtained and was measured at 382 mg/dL. A head CT and other laboratory findings including renal and liver function, chemistry panel, blood count, and blood gas analysis were unremarkable. The patient was admitted to the inten- sive care unit for supportive care and was successfully extubated after approximately 24 hours with baseline men- tal status. Upon questioning, the patient reported mixing the hand sanitizer gel with table salt, then running it through a sock to remove all salt and solids, thus leaving a consumable liquid. This was her first use of this product. She denied any other co-ingestants. We performed a reproduction of the described extrac- tion process to determine how effectively ethanol can be isolated. This method has been previously described online (68). Two tablespoons of table salt (NaCl) were added to two tablespoons of hand sanitizer gel (62% ethyl alcohol) and then filtered through a cotton cheesecloth to produce a clear, colorless liquid. Ethanol concentrations of the hand sanitizer gel and post- extraction liquid were analyzed using the Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (protonated) (NADH)-generating enzymatic method. The post-distillation product yielded roughly 30% more ethanol per volume than the parent hand sanitizer gel (5278 vs 4084 mg/dL). Gormley described 68,712 intentional exposures to alcohol-based hand sanitizers reported to the National Poison Database System between 2005 and 2009 with an average increase of 1894 new cases per year (3). Clinicians and facility administrators need to be aware of the potential for misuse of these products as intox- icants and take measures to limit their availability to at- risk populations. Additionally, manufacturers and distri- butors should consider developing tamper-resistant dispensers in an attempt to minimize large quantity ingestions. REFERENCES 1. Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/ IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002; 51:145. 2. Joint Commission.Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals (CAMH). Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 2006. 3. Gormley NJ, Bronstein AC, Rasimas JJ, Pao M, Wratney AT, Sun J, Austin HA, Suffredini AF. The rising incidence of intentional ingestion of ethanol-containing hand sanitizers. Crit Care Med 2012; 40(1):290294. Address correspondence to Michael A. Darracq, M.D., M.P.H., 4374 Arcadia Drive, San Diego, CA 92103, USA. Tel: þ619 299 9849. E-mail: [email protected] 217 Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by SUNY State University of New York at Stony Brook on 10/29/14 For personal use only.

Hand Sanitizer Intoxication Following a Crude Extraction Method

  • Upload
    f-lee

  • View
    215

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 2013; 39(3): 217–218Copyright © Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.ISSN: 0095-2990 print/1097-9891 onlineDOI: 10.3109/00952990.2013.773335

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Hand Sanitizer Intoxication Following a Crude Extraction Method

Michael A. Darracq, M.D., M.P.H.1,2, Nasim Ghafouri, Pharm.D.2, Amadeo Pesce, Ph.D.3, andF. Lee Cantrell, Pharm.D.2

1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA, 2California PoisonControl System, San Diego Division, San Diego, CA, USA, 3Millenium Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA

Ethanol-based hand sanitizers are recommended bymany public health authorities as an alternative to wash-ing for hand hygiene (1,2). Widespread availability hasgiven rise to a concerning trend. In recent years, therehave been an increasing number of intentional inges-tions of ethanol-based hand sanitizers (3), some ofwhich have occurred in controlled settings such as hos-pitals (4) and prisons (5). We report the case of a severehand sanitizer intoxication which occurred in a psychia-tric facility.

A 40-year-old patient in a locked psychiatric facilitywas found to be minimally responsive in her room alongwith two empty 1L bags of hand sanitizer. Emergencymedical services (EMS) was contacted and the patientwas intubated en route to the emergency department dueto a decreased level of consciousness and respiratorydepression. She was previously observed in her usualstate of health. Vital signs were within normal limitsupon arrival and during hospitalization. Due to the historyof exposure, a blood ethanol concentration was obtainedand was measured at 382 mg/dL. A head CT and otherlaboratory findings including renal and liver function,chemistry panel, blood count, and blood gas analysiswere unremarkable. The patient was admitted to the inten-sive care unit for supportive care and was successfullyextubated after approximately 24 hours with baseline men-tal status. Upon questioning, the patient reported mixingthe hand sanitizer gel with table salt, then running itthrough a sock to remove all salt and solids, thus leavinga consumable liquid. This was her first use of this product.She denied any other co-ingestants.

We performed a reproduction of the described extrac-tion process to determine how effectively ethanol can beisolated. This method has been previously describedonline (6–8). Two tablespoons of table salt (NaCl)

were added to two tablespoons of hand sanitizer gel(62% ethyl alcohol) and then filtered through a cottoncheesecloth to produce a clear, colorless liquid. Ethanolconcentrations of the hand sanitizer gel and post-extraction liquid were analyzed using the Nicotinamideadenine dinucleotide (protonated) (NADH)-generatingenzymatic method. The post-distillation product yieldedroughly 30%more ethanol per volume than the parent handsanitizer gel (5278 vs 4084 mg/dL).

Gormley described 68,712 intentional exposures toalcohol-based hand sanitizers reported to the NationalPoison Database System between 2005 and 2009 withan average increase of 1894 new cases per year (3).Clinicians and facility administrators need to be awareof the potential for misuse of these products as intox-icants and take measures to limit their availability to at-risk populations. Additionally, manufacturers and distri-butors should consider developing tamper-resistantdispensers in an attempt to minimize large quantityingestions.

REFERENCES

1. Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-caresettings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection ControlPractices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002;51:1–45.

2. Joint Commission.Comprehensive Accreditation Manual forHospitals (CAMH). Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commissionon Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 2006.

3. Gormley NJ, Bronstein AC, Rasimas JJ, Pao M, Wratney AT,Sun J, Austin HA, Suffredini AF. The rising incidence ofintentional ingestion of ethanol-containing hand sanitizers.Crit Care Med 2012; 40(1):290–294.

Address correspondence to Michael A. Darracq, M.D., M.P.H., 4374 Arcadia Drive, San Diego, CA 92103, USA. Tel: þ619 299 9849.E-mail: [email protected]

217

Am

J D

rug

Alc

ohol

Abu

se D

ownl

oade

d fr

om in

form

ahea

lthca

re.c

om b

y SU

NY

Sta

te U

nive

rsity

of

New

Yor

k at

Sto

ny B

rook

on

10/2

9/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.

4. Bookstaver PB, Norris LB, Michels JE. Ingestion of handsanitizer by a hospitalized patient with a history of alcoholabuse. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008; 65(23):2203–2204.

5. Doyon S, Welsh C. Intoxication of a prison inmate with anethyl alcohol-based hand sanitizer. N Engl J Med 2007;356(5):529–530.

6. Grimm G. How to Use Salt to Separate Purell. Available athttp://www.ehow.co.uk/how_7504498_use-salt-separate-purell.html. Last accessed on January 7, 2012.

7. The Drink Nation. Kids Are Drinking Hand Sanitizer.Available at http://thedrinknation.com/articles/read/7386-Kids-Are-Drinking-Hand-Sanitizer. Last accessed onJanuary 7, 2012.

8. CBS New York. Dangerous Trend: Teens Drinking HandSanitizer, Equivalent to 120 Proof Liquor. Available at http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/04/24/dangerous-trend-teens-drinking-hand-sanitizer-to-get-drunk/. Last accessed on January 7,2012.

218 M. A. DARRACQ ET AL.

Am

J D

rug

Alc

ohol

Abu

se D

ownl

oade

d fr

om in

form

ahea

lthca

re.c

om b

y SU

NY

Sta

te U

nive

rsity

of

New

Yor

k at

Sto

ny B

rook

on

10/2

9/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.