Upload
tranthuan
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Biogas from dairy farm
ponds Stephan Heubeck & Rupert Craggs
Hamiltion
22. April 2015
National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd, New Zealand
Why bother with pond biogas systems?
“Look deep into nature, and then you will
understand everything better”
Albert Einstein
Storage pond sites 2013 • Monitoring sites in Northland, Waikato and
Southland
• Farms of high and low intensity
o (use of feed pads, stocking rate)
• Pond biogas production + quality
• Raw effluent quantity
• Raw effluent quality:
o Solids - TS/VS, COD
o Nitrogen - TN
o Phosphorus - TP
2013 storage pond monitoring Pond temperature shows seasonal variation:
• Minimum pond bottom: ~ 7oC
• Minimum pond water: ~ 3oC
2013 storage pond CH4 Southland storage pond:
• Correlates with number of cows milked
• Autumn reduction due to single milking
2013 storage pond CH4 Waikato storage pond:
• Milk throughout winter – more constant load
• Greater correlation of CH4 production with
solids load than temperature
Per cow solids loading:
• Southland: 0.29 kgTS/0.18kgVS /cow/day
• Waikato: 1.13 kgTS/0.82kgVS /cow/day
feed pad
Methane productivity:
• Southland: 0.21 m3CH4/kgVS
• Waikato: 0.22 m3CH4/kgVS
2013 storage pond summary
2013 storage pond methane emissions:
• Southland: 6.7 kgCH4/cow/year
• Northland: 8.3 kgCH4/cow/year
• Waikato: 34.1 kgCH4/cow/year
feed pad – more solids
2012 anaerobic pond methane emissions:
• Southland: 14.37 kgCH4/cow/year
• Northland: 14.45 kgCH4/cow/year
• Waikato: 7.68 kgCH4/cow/year
Methane GHG Emissions
Pond monitoring summary Dairy farm effluent ponds minus side:
• Release much more GHG emissions (methane)
than previously assumed
• Emissions will increase with farm intensification
Dairy farm effluent ponds plus side :
• Conversion of VS to CH4 similar to engineered
digesters
• Very good at removing (coarse) solids
• Simple to build
• Simple to operate
• Can cover to capture odour and GHG
• Biogas energy potential
Basics:
o For flush manures and dilute wastes only
o Solids concentrations up to ~5%
o Different retention times for solids and liquids
o Loading rates <0.5 kgVS/m3/day
o Retrofits possible
NIWA Covered Anaerobic Pond Design
Custom designed covered anaerobic pond: o Deep, narrow and long pond
o Dedicated pond often better than retrofit
o Covering (shallow) storage pond often uneconomic
o Liner depending on regulation (plastic, clay)
NIWA Covered Anaerobic Pond Design
NIWA Covered Anaerobic Pond Design
Simple cover: o Common cover materials (LLDPE)
o Flexible, UV resistant, cost effective
o Weight pipes for rainwater guidance
o Electric rainwater draw off pump
o Ring pipeline for efficient biogas draw-off
o No floatation underneath cover
Biogas is the most versatile renewable
energy resource - usage options include:
o Flaring – GHG and odour control
o Combined heat and power (CHP) – generator
o Heat – boiler use
o Transport fuel – purification and compression
There is no size
that fits all!
Biogas use options
Biogas flaring
Biogas flaring: o Low maintenance
o Odour and GHG control
o No local heat demand
o Small electricity demand
o Not big enough for advanced biogas use options like vehicle fuel etc.
Biogas CHP Motor-generators:
o Spark ignition
o Gas purification for generator longevity
o Grid synchronisation or stand alone
o Radiator heat recovery
o Exhaust heat recovery
o Renewable 3-phase electricity on call
o With biogas storage back-up function for grid outages
Biogas CHP
Waste heat use: o 80-90 C hot water
o 2 kWh hot water for every 1 kWh electricity
o Hot water for washing and heating
o Hot water can be stored independently to decouple electric and thermal load
Biogas as boiler fuel
The “overlooked” option: o Far simpler to operate than CHP
o Little (no) biogas purification required
o Highly efficient biogas use: 90 – 102% efficiency
o Doable at small scale
o Financial attractiveness can be good as well
Biogas transport fuel
Biogas as transport fuel:
o Purified and compressed biogas (bio-methane)
can be used in any CNG vehicle
o The size of the biogas resource on NZ farms may
be often too small to justify the high investment
o Further increases in the cost of petroleum fuels
may however make this option attractive in the
future
So how much does a covered anaerobic
pond based biogas system cost, and
does it make financial sense?
Biogas from covered
anaerobic ponds
The answer depends, because:
o Every farm is different
(size, soil, existing gear)
o A lot of covered
anaerobic ponds will be
built without biogas use
As solids removal technology:
o Dry matter (DM) reduction higher than with
mechanical solids separator or weeping wall
o Cost less than mechanical solids separator and
about equal to weeping wall
o No odour or GHG emissions
o Maintenance more flexible
Covered Anaerobic Ponds
Covered Anaerobic Pond treated effluent
ready for:
o Recycling as wash water, i.e. through backing
gate
o Injection into low application sprinkler system (K-
line) or centre pivot irrigator
Covered Anaerobic Ponds
Covered Anaerobic Ponds As compliance tool:
o Reduce effluent odour see pig industry
o Reduce GHG emissions the dairy industry’s
chance to reduce the GHG foot-print by 10 –
20% with here and now technology without
curtailing production
Indicative costs Assuming a 600 cow dairy farm with feed pad. Covered Anaerobic Pond added to existing storage pond system for pre-treatment: Earth works: $15k – $25k$ (cut and fill or import?)
Plastic: $15k - $35k (bottom liner required?)
Pond pipe work: $5k - $10k
Consents, Planning, Supervision: ????
Biogas piping and conditioning: $5k - $15k
Biogas boiler: $3k - $6k
Biogas CHP: $30k - $80k (longevity, only ~2,500 h/y!)
Installation and connections: $5 - $30k (lines company decides)
Biogas value Assuming a 600 cow dairy farm with feed pad:
Annual electricity consumption: 80k – 120k kWh/y
Thereof hot water (heat): 25k – 30k kWh/y
Annual usable electricity generation: 50k – 70k kWh/y
Annual usable hot water generation: 25k – 30k kWh/y
Gross earnings biogas boiler: $3k/y - $7k/y (D/N tariff!)
Gross earnings biogas CHP: $15k/y - $30k/y (lines charging structure and / or islanding of generation will have a big impact on net result)
Biogas use The early (mass) adopters for covered anaerobic pond based biogas technology will therefore be piggy-backed schemes where the pond is in place for other reasons:
o Biogas system payback = payback of gas user
o Can be economic for small (gas boiler) and large schemes (CHP)
o Economic threshold of <3 years doable