8/2/2019 Hadley v Baxendale Assgmnt.

1/2

Consumer Law

Part A on Hadley v Baxendale.

It has been already noted that where a buyer of goods is injured as a result of the product being

defective, then he can recover for his personal injuries by latching them onto a claim that the

goods are not of satisfactory quality and that the natural and probable consequence of that

breach is that an injury occurred.

a) With reference to Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 156 ER 145, discuss the normal contractualrule for damages.

Liew Ee Ling- Discuss on the principle and application of Hadley v Baxendale in terms of Contract Law.

-Talk more on the claims and profit based on the loss (as such in the Hadey case)

-Compare this with Australian view (E.g take a case which applies the same principle and applied)

Bryan-As for you discuss in the aspect of Consumerism (Consumer Law)

-Talk based on the standards of good, implied guarantee and also the Product Liability

-Compare this with Australian view (E.g by doing the same as Ee Ling except your part is more

towards constructive on the question itself which is in the matter of injury and damages.)

Muzhaffar- Discuss this aspect in the aspect of Tort Law.

-Compare this with Australian view (E.g take a case which applies the same principle and applied)

By all means we are comparing this with Australian Trade Practice Act (in Australian view) so in

whatever principle and context of the general application in Hadley and Baxendale look through

the Australian Act in Production and Consumption as well. I divided this into three areas of Law

Contract, Tort and Consumer as itself.

Each person, have Max 5 pages to do, submit before September 6th

. Good LuckP/S: Remember to compare this with Australian view and refer back to the question to make sure

its parallel with your answer in the assignment.

Regards.

Muzhaffar Razak

8/2/2019 Hadley v Baxendale Assgmnt.

2/2