H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA ...€¦ · Layout of the proposal: Part B B2 •The CV is intrinsic to the evaluation of the whole proposal, limited to

LIMITLESS POTENTIAL | LIMITLESS OPPORTUNITIES | LIMITLESS IMPACT

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA-IF) 2018

Henna Patel, Assistant EU Funding Manager

[email protected]

Dr Elena Koukharenko, EU Funding Manager

[email protected]

15th May 2018

Call for proposals submission deadline: 12th September 2018 (4pm UK time)

1

mailto:[email protected]



12:00-12:10 Registration (sandwich lunch and coffee will be provided)

12:10 – 12:50 MSCA IFs in H2020 - Overview of the scheme, rules for participation; how to develop a competitive proposal (Dr Elena Koukharenko, EU Funding Manager; Henna Patel, Assistant EU Funding Manager, RES)

12:50-13:00 Q&A

13:00-13:50 MSCA IF Case studies

• What it takes to prepare a successful application (Dr Karen Dempsey, Archaeology, Current fellowship holder)

• Evaluators’ perspective (Prof Philip Beaman, PCLS, MSCA-IF evaluator)

13:50-14:00 Q&A session

14:00 Close

Agenda

2


Overview of the scheme and rules for participation

Henna Patel, Assistant EU Funding Manager

3


Horizon 2020 structure

4

Excellent Science

European Research Council (ERC)

Future and EmergingTechnologies (FET)

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

Research Infrastructures

Industrial Leadership

Leadership in Enabling and

Industrial Technologies (LEIT)- ICT, NMBP, Space

Access to Risk Finance

Innovation in SMEs

Societal Challenges

Health and Wellbeing

Food security

Transport

Energy

Climate action

Societies

Security

Widening Participation; Science with and for Society, Mainstreaming of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) and ICT, Fast Track to Innovation

European Institute of Innovation and

Technology (EIT)EURATOM

Joint Research Centre (JRC)

13 million

2.6 million

6.2 million

2.5 million


Concept of Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

[source: MSCA Work Programme 2018-2020]

5

…contribute to excellent research, boost jobs, growth and investment, by equipping researchers with the new knowledge, skills and international and intersectoral exposure to solve current and future societal challenges. MSCA foster innovation, research-business cooperation and a strong international component.


MSCA Key definitions

6

Experienced Researcher (ER)

At the time of the call deadline , must be in possession of a doctoral degree or have at least 4 years of full-time equivalent research experience

Full-timeequivalent research experience

Measured from the date when a researcher obtained the degree which would formally entitle them to embark on a doctorate, either in the country in which the degree was obtained or in the country in which the researcher is recruited, irrespective of whether or not a doctorate is or was ever envisaged

Academic sector Includes universities and higher education institutions (public and private) awarding degrees, non-profit research institutions (public and private), and international European interest organisations

Non-academic sector

Includes any socio-economic actor not included in the academic sector

Beneficiary Host organisation which recruits, supervises, and provides training for the researcher, taking complete responsibility for the proper implementation of the action

Partner organisation

Contribute to the action to provide additional training and host researchers during secondments. Do not employ the researchers or sign the grant agreement

Supervisor Scientist appointed at the host organisation to supervise the researcher throughout the duration of the project


• What is covered by the grant:

oResearcher’s salary

oMobility allowance

o Family allowance (if applicable)

oResearch, training and networking costs

oOverheads (management and indirect costs)

• Research topic is completely bottom up –excellent project in any field

• Calibre of researcher: any career stage, no age limit or maximum years of

experience

• Researcher and host institution (i.e. beneficiary) work together on

application, in collaboration with a named supervisor

• Researcher’s CV is weighted as part of the proposal

• Fellowships can be held on a full-time or part-time basis

• Optional secondments are possible if this would significantly boost impact

of the project.

General Information

7


Types of individual fellowships (IF)

European Fellowships

(12-24 months)

Global Fellowships

(12-24 months + 12 month return phase)

•Outgoing

•Return

From any country to MS/AC

• Secondment from MS/AC

to third country

• Mandatory return phase

in Europe

(not subject to mobility rule)

Note: Grant Holder (beneficiary) is in a MS or AC

8

Standard European (ST)

Society & Enterprise (SE)

Career Restart (CAR)

Reintegration (RI)


Eligibility rules European Fellowships• Researcher experience: applicant must be an ER; at the time of the call deadline,

must be in possession of a PhD or have at least 4 years of full-time equivalent research

experience.

• May be of any nationality. Exception for the RI panel where researchers must be

nationals or long-term residents of an EU MS or AC.

• No age restrictions apply.

• Mobility rule: at the time of the call deadline, researchers shall not have resided or

carried out their main activity (work, studies etc.) in the country where their host

organisation is located for more than 12 months in the last 3 years.

o Exceptions apply for the SE, CAR and RI panel; cannot have carried out their main

activity in the host country for 3 in the last 5 years.

• To qualify for the CAR, researchers must not have been active in research for at least 12

months within the 18 months immediately prior to the call deadline.

9


Eligibility rules

Global Fellowships• Researcher experience: applicant must be an ER, i.e. at the time of the call

deadline, must be in possession of a PhD or have at least 4 years of full-time equivalent research experience.

• Must be a national or long-term resident of an EU MS or AC.

• No age restrictions apply.

• Mobility rule for the outgoing phase: at the time of the call deadline, researchers shall not have resided or carried out their main activity (work, studies etc) in the Third Country where their outgoing phase will take place, for more than 12 months in the last 3 years.

• The beneficiary (host organisation) must be located in an EU MS or AC.

• The partner organisation for the initial outgoing phase must be situated in a Third Country.

10


Member States (MS, EU-28): Austria , Belgium , Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany , Greece ,Hungary , Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg , Malta, Netherlands , Poland , Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom

Associated countries (AC, 16 countries currently) to Horizon 2020: Switzerland, Israel, Norway, Iceland, Turkey, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), Serbia, Albania, Armenia, Montenegro, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Faroe Islands, Republic of Moldova, Tunisia, Ukraine and Georgia

Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) linked to the Member States: e.g. Anguilla, Aruba, Bermuda, Bonaire, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Curaçao, Falkland Islands, French Polynesia, Montserrat (…)

Eligible Countries for MSCA-IF-EF

Types of organisations• National Governmental or public organisations (e.g.

universities, research centres etc.); • International Organisations (intergovernmental)• Commercial enterprises, including those of small and

medium size (SMEs); • Non-profit or charitable organisations (e.g. NGOs,

trusts, etc.); • International European Interest Organisations (e.g.

CERN, EMBL, etc.); • The Joint Research Centre of the European Commission.

11


1. Chemistry (CHE)2. Social Sciences & Humanities (SOC) 3. Economic Sciences (ECO) 4. Information Science and Engineering (ENG)5. Environment and Geosciences (ENV) 6. Life Sciences (LIF) 7. Mathematics (MAT) 8. Physics (PHY)

List of panels for proposals submission

12


Proposal finances & budget estimation

Researcher unit cost in EUR

Person/month

Institutional unit cost in EUR

Person/month

Living AllowanceMobility

AllowanceFamily Allowance

Research, training

and networking

costs

Management and

indirect costs

Individual

Fellowships4,880 600 500 800 650

13

• A correction country co-efficient applies to the living allowance – see Work Programme for 2018 rates

• Funding based fully on unit costs, multiplied by requested person months

• Budget is automatically calculated when person months entered in the application

• No detailed financial reporting


Researcher with family, coming from the Netherlands to UK for two years with a European Fellowship:

Contribution to researcher:

• Living Allowance: 4,880 x 24 months = € 117,120 x UK’s Correction factor = 139.8%

€ 117,120 x 1.398 = € 163,733.76

• Mobility Allowance: 600 x 24 months = € 14,400•• Family Allowance: 500 x 24 months = € 12,000

Contribution to host institution:

• Contribution to research and training expenses:

(managed by the Host institution)

€ 800 x 24 months= €19,200

• Contribution to overheads:

€ 650 x 24 months = €15,600

Maximum EC grant: € 224,933.76

Contribution to the researcher and the host institution – EF example

14

€190,133.76


UK researcher with no family spending an outgoing period of two years in the US followed

by the mandatory 12 month return phase in the UK on a Global Fellowship:

Contribution to researcher:• Living Allowance: “outgoing phase” 4,880 x 24 months = € 117,120 x Correction coefficient (US) = 99.1%

€ 117,120 x 0.991 = € 116,065.92

“return phase” 4,880 x 12 months = € 58,560 x Correction coefficient (UK) = 139.8%€ 58,560 x 1.398 = € 81,866.88

Total living allowance = 116,065.92 + 81,866.88 = € 197,932.80

• Mobility Allowance: 600 x 36 months = € 21,600 € 219,532.80• Family Allowance: 0 x 36 months = € 0

Contribution to host institution:

• Contribution to research and training expenses: (managed by the Host institution)

€ 800 x 36 months= € 28,800• Contribution to overheads:

€ 650 x 36 months = € 23,400

Maximum EC grant: € 271,732.80

Contribution to the researcher and the host institution –GF example

15


16

Layout of the proposal: Part APart A: Administrative form

• Abstract• Scientific area• Acronym • Secondments (under Call-specific

questions)


17

• Budget automatically calculated based on duration and beneficiary location

• Option for family allowance • No requirement for specifying use of budget

Layout of the proposal: Part A


Layout of the proposal: Part B

B1: core of the proposal

18

Proposals must respect the following minimum standards:• a minimum font size of 11 points,

except for the Gantt chart and tables where the minimum font size is 8 points

• A4 page size• a clearly readable font • Tables are for illustrating the core

text of the proposal. They cannot be used to contain the core text itself.

• Implementation: Gantt chart must be included


19

Layout of the proposal: Part B

B2

• The CV is intrinsic to the evaluation of the whole proposal, limited to a maximumof 5 pages and should include the standard academic and research record.

• Any research career gaps and/or unconventional paths should be clearly explainedso that this can be fairly assessed by the independent evaluators.

• Capacity of participating organisations


Online submission

Link to call topic here: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/msca-if-2018.html

Submission via H2020 Participant Portal – ‘how to’ guide available here:

http://www.reading.ac.uk/web/files/reas/How_to_sign_in_to_the_EU_Login_system_-_guidance_sheet2.pdf

20

https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/msca-if-2018.html

http://www.reading.ac.uk/web/files/reas/How_to_sign_in_to_the_EU_Login_system_-_guidance_sheet2.pdf


21

• Topic conditions and documents available here

• Select relevant action to start submission and create a proposal

• Must select correct action as cannot be changed later

Online submission


PanelRetained List Threshold

Reserve List Threshold

Success Rate %

CHE 91.8 90.4 13.2

ECO 90.6 89.4 12.7

ENG 91.8 90.8 13.1

ENV 92 91 12.9

LIF 92.2 91.2 13.1

MAT 91.6 91.2 13.2

PHY 91.2 90.2 13.2

SOC 92.8 91.4 13.1

CAR 90.8 89 12.8

RI 92.6 91.6 13.4

Success rates: European fellowships – 2016 call

SE (new) 80.6 75.4 36.4

22


PanelRetained List Threshold

Reserve List Threshold

Success Rate %

CHE 93.6 92.4 12.3

ECO 94.4 88 11.5

ENG 93.6 93.2 12.7

ENV 93.6 92 12.8

LIF 92 91.2 13.3

MAT 88.6 87.4 13.6

PHY 92.6 91.4 13.2

SOC 95 94.2 13.6

Success rates: Global fellowships – 2016 call

23


Success rates: European fellowships – 2017 call

24

PanelRetained List

Threshold

Reserve List

Threshold

Success Rate %

CHE 91.4 90.4 14.8

ECO 89 88.8 14.8

ENG 91.4 90.4 14.6

ENV 92.2 91.6 14.8

LIF 93 92.2 14.8

MAT 91.6 90.6 15.1

PHY 90 89.6 14.8

SOC 91 90 14.7

CAR 91.4 89.2 14.6

RI 93.4 93 15

SE 83.6 82.2 28.7


Success rates: Global fellowships – 2017 call

25

Panel Retained List

Threshold

Reserve List

ThresholdSuccess Rate %

CHE 93.2 92 16.4

ECO 88.2 87.6 17.1

ENG 93 92.2 16.9

ENV 92.6 91.8 17

LIF 91.4 90.6 16.6

MAT 93.2 92 12.7

PHY 91.4 90.4 16.4

SOC 92.4 90.8 17.4


How to prepare a competitive Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual fellowship application, evaluation criteria

Elena Koukharenko, EU Funding Manager

26


Evaluation criteria

[source: MSCA Work Programme 2018] 27


Score descriptors

•0 – Proposal fails to address the criterion or cannot be assessed due to missing or incomplete information.

•1 – Poor. The criterion is inadequately addressed, or there are serious inherent weaknesses.

•2 – Fair. Proposal broadly addresses the criterion, but there are significant weaknesses.

•3 – Good. Proposal addresses the criterion well, but a number of shortcomings are present.

•4 – Very Good. Proposal addresses the criterion very well, but a small number of shortcomings are present.

•5 – Excellent. Proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the criterion. Any shortcomings are minor.

• Threshold is 70% but competitive proposals need to aim at a score of 90+%!

• Evaluation summary reports provided as feedback to applicants along with score and funding decision

• No restrictions on re-submission, but applicants discouraged from making references to previous evaluation results


Think of the following:

for Researcher:

-Why is so important for my career now?

-Why to do this research now?

-Why am I the best candidate to do this research?

-Why the future Supervisor is the best scholar to learn from?

-What will I do after this fellowship finishes?

For Supervisors:

-How my group will benefit from the Researcher’s knowledge?

-How will I contribute to help the researcher to learn new skills and to progress in their career?

Before starting writing

29

Dr Elena Koukharenko 15th May 2018


• Think about evaluators

• Clearly address the main objectives

• Use clear and concise language

• Explain country specific jargon

• Provide them with the evidence they need

Approaching proposal writing

Dr Elena Koukharenko 15th May 201830


• Treat the criteria like JOB INTERVIEW questions

• Keep the Guide for Applicants, proposal template, Work programme in front of you

• Work with your Supervisor/Fellow- Joined effort :

-Fellow: e.g. providing a proposal in a timely manner

-Supervisor: e.g. providing all relevant to a proposal

information about their academic track record, University’s infrastructures

• Proposal’s multiple reviews:

-Make sure that Future Supervisor reviewed science part

-Find other colleagues to read it through, with the evaluation criteria in hand

Approaching proposal writing

31Dr Elena Koukharenko 15th May 2018


Proposal template(can be downloaded from: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/msca-if-2018.html

32

• Provide an answer to all bullet points in the template to address fully evaluation criteria/subriteria



• 1.Excellence -50%

• 1.1 – Quality and credibility of the research/innovation project; level of novelty, appropriate consideration of inter/multidisciplinary and gender aspects

• 1.2 - Quality and appropriateness of the training and of the two way transfer of knowledge between the researcher and the host

• 1.3 - Quality of the supervision and of the integration in the team/institution

• 1.4 -Potential of the researcher to reach or re-enforce professional maturity/independence during the fellowship

• 4 - CV of the Experienced Researcher (evaluating in conjunction with this section)

IF evaluation criteria



1. Excellence

•Clear logical structure: Introduction, overall aim of the proposal, state-of-the-art, objectives •Research methodology and approach: explain in details!

•Originality and innovative aspects of the research programme: convince that the project is expected to make to advancements in chosen research area. Any novel concepts or methods ?

--The text should emphasise how the high-quality, novel research is the most likely

to open up the best career possibilities for the Experienced Researcher, bring new

knowledge and new collaboration opportunities for the host organisation(s).

1.1 - Quality and credibility of the research/innovation project; level of novelty, appropriate consideration of inter/multidisciplinary and gender aspects

34

-Discuss the details* of interdisciplinary aspects of the action (if relevant).-Discuss the gender dimension in the research content (if relevant).


-Training-through-research project-multi-fold approach:

--new research skills (new techniques, instruments, concepts)

--exposure to different sectors; interdisciplinary fields

--transferable skills (e.g. supervising and monitoring, proposal preparation to request funding, patent applications, organisation of scientific/training/dissemination events, project, financial management, outreach etc..)

-Two-way interaction between researcher and host(s):

• What new knowledge and skills will the researcher develop;

• What existing knowledge and skills will the researcher bring to the host(s).

1.2 - Quality and appropriateness of the training and of the two way transfer of knowledge between the researcher and the host



-Qualifications and experience of the supervisor(s) (both for GF):

• Include evidence that the supervisor is suitably qualified/experienced to ensure the success of the Fellowship;

• Examples of relevant to proposal activities: participation in projects, publications, patents, research results, international collaborations and experience supervising;

• If other colleagues will provide mentoring, describe it.

• Hosting arrangements:

• Measures to ensure the successful integration of the Researcher and transfer of knowledge/skills;

• Is there an institutional Research Development Strategy – describe it;

• Consider what the Career Development Plan would look like.

1.3 –Quality of the supervision and of the integrationin the team/institution



• Researchers should be able to show that they have an excellent track record given their career status:

• e.g. Publications, patents, conference papers, chapters, monographs.

• Highlight all relevant experiences, including teaching, supervision, or work with industry/non-academic partners.

Summarised major achievement (~250 words)

• Demonstrate they have capacity for independent thinking and leadership

• Convince that the researcher is right for the project and that they will develop and grow during the training

• Explain how this will have an enormous positive impact on the researcher’s career

1.4 -Potential of the researcher to reach or re-enforce professional maturity/independence during the fellowship

37


2. Impact- 30%• 2.1 - Enhancing the future career prospects of the researcher after the

fellowship• 2.2 - Quality of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results• 2.3-Quality of the proposed measures to communicate the project

activities to different target audiences


EXPECTED IMPACT

Researcher level Organisation level System level

· Increased set of research-related and transferable skills to improve employability and career prospects both in and outside academia · Increase in higher impact R&I output, more knowledge and ideas converted into products and services · Greater contribution to the knowledge-based economy and society

•Enhanced cooperation andstronger networks•Better transfer ofknowledge between sectorsand disciplines•Boosting of R&I capacityamong participatingorganisations

•Increase in international,interdisciplinary and intersectoralmobility of researchers in Europe•Stronger Europe's human capitalbase in R&I with more better trainedand entrepreneurial researchers•Better communication of R&I results to society•Increase in Europe's attractivenessas a leading destination for R&I• Better quality of R& contributing to Europe's competitiveness and growth



A. Detail the expected impact of the Fellowship (training and research) on the researchers career AFTER the Fellowship:

Thinking of the following questions:

– What are the researcher’s professional goals and how will the Fellowship contribute;

– What specific new skills be developed, including those which are transferable;

– New experiences: e.g. in new country, culture and way of thinking; new sectors through secondments

Be precise as to how this will all be achieved through the project

2.1 -Enhancing the potential & future career prospects of the researcher

39

B. Other types of expected impact


•Dissemination of the research results

-Select appropriate targeted audiences (“end-users”: e.g. scientific community, industry or policymakers etc.)

-Describe specific planned dissemination and exploitation activities and include them in the Gantt Chart

•Exploitation of results and intellectual property

-If appropriate, present specific IPR arrangements. If not relevant, mention so, as

shows awareness of IPR

2.2-Quality of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results

Targeted audiences Possible outcomes

-Research community-End-users-Policy makers

-Exploitation: using results for advancing knowledge in a specific research filed; commercial purposesor in public policymaking

• Dissemination of results - Open Access requirements

Explain how Dissemination feeds into Exploitation

Online Manual – Dissemination & Exploitation http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/grants/grant-management/dissemination-of-results_en.htm

40

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/grants/grant-management/dissemination-of-results_en.htm


2.3 Quality of the proposed measures to communicate the project activities to different target audiences

Online Manual – Communicating your Project:

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/grants/grant-management/communication_en.htm

Communication and public engagement strategy of the action isto bring science closer to general public

•Prepare a detailed communication strategy and timeline (include in in the Gantt Chart)

•Have clear communication goals, objectives and defined audiences

•Use the right medium and means

•Be realistic in how many activities could be achievable within the project duration

• Possible inclusions to promote research to general public:-Marie Skłodowska-Curie Ambassadors-Marie Skłodowska-Curie Project Open Doors-Public talks, TV-Talks, podcasts and articles in newspapers-E-Newsletters-Multimedia releases

41

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/grants/grant-management/communication_en.htm


• 3. Implementation-20%3.1 Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including

appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources

• The project Work Plan should be clear and realistic and show how the desired impacts will be achieved

• Include a Gantt Chart as given in application example using time elapsed by month to show:

• Work Packages description, can be included for all activities, i.e. research, management, training;

• List of major deliverables (e.g. research outputs, publications)

• List of major milestones;

• Secondments (if applicable).




• 3. Implementation-20%


43

GANTT CHART EXAMPLE ONLY

• Explain how the work plan and resources mobilised will ensure success• Explain why the duration of the project, or secondments or specific work

packages is appropriate is appropriate to achieve the objectives


Describe the project organisation and management structure:

• Financial management structure;

• What progress monitoring will be in place.

• Risk management:

-What are the potential scientific or non-scientific risks that could

jeopardise the project:

- What level of contingency planning will be in place.

• 3.4 - Appropriateness of the institutional environment (infrastructure)

• Why is it an appropriate place to conduct the Fellowship;

• Do they have experience in the research field/hosting Fellows;

• Demonstrate commitment by providing the researcher with that needed to successfully complete the Fellowship.

3.3 -Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures, including risk management

44


●Research-type:--Not convincing that the project will advance the current state of the art--Feasibility issues--Not detailed methodology

● Training-type:--Complementarity of acquired skills by the Researcher issues--Lack of consideration to transferable skills--two-ways knowledge transfer between the Researcher and future host institutions is not convincing

● Track-record of a researcher and a supervisor--Skills of Fellow/Supervisor do not match--Examples in track record are generic and not specific to the proposal

● Public engagement/outreach- type● Not enough consideration for non-scientific sections in general

Categories of common weaknesses



•https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/msca-if-2018.html

(Individual Fellowship Call Page 2018)

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/guides_for_applicants/h2020-guide-appl-msca-if-2018-20_en.pdf

(guide for applicants, MSCA Work Programme call text, frequently asked questions)

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-comm-diss_en.pdf

(Dissemination, Exploitation and Evaluation)

http://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/msca/documents/documentation/publications/outreach_activities_en.pdf

(Marie Curie Guidance for Outreach)

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/call_ptef/ef/2018-2020/h2020-call-ef-msca-if-2018-20_en.pdf

(self evaluation forms)

http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/index.cfm/rights/europeanCharter

(European Charter for Researcher)

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual fellowship: useful sources of information

46


http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/guides_for_applicants/h2020-guide-appl-msca-if-2018-20_en.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-comm-diss_en.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/msca/documents/documentation/publications/outreach_activities_en.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/call_ptef/ef/2018-2020/h2020-call-ef-msca-if-2018-20_en.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/index.cfm/rights/europeanCharter


Other resources

Become an Evaluator!MSCA-IF awarded Projectsdatabase

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/experts/index.html

https://cordis.europa.eu/projects/result_en?q=(contenttype%3D'project'%20OR%20/result/relations/categories/resultCategory/code%3D'brief','report')%20AND%20programme/code%3D'H2020-EU.1.3.2.' 47

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/experts/index.html

LIMITLESS POTENTIAL | LIMITLESS OPPORTUNITIES | LIMITLESS IMPACT48

Case Studies

• Dr Karen Dempsey, Archaeology, Current fellowship holder

• Prof Philip Beaman, PCLS, MSCA-IF evaluator


Contact details for an advice

Contacts to EU Unit at Reading:

EU Funding Managers:

Elena Koukharenko : [email protected] Tel. 8844. Themes: Environment; Health; Heritage and Creativity

Mischa Phillips: [email protected] Tel. 4494. Themes: Food; Prosperity and Resilience

EU Funding Manager Assistant: Henna Patel, [email protected], Tel.4184

Marie Skłodowska-Curie NCP Helpdesk:http://www.ukro.ac.uk/mariecurie/[email protected]: +32 2 230 0318

49




http://www.ukro.ac.uk/mariecurie/index.htm


Thank you!

Questions?

50

Documents

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA ...€¦ · Layout of the proposal: Part B B2 •The CV is intrinsic to the evaluation of the whole proposal, limited to