Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DECISIVE
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agree ment No 691761
Project launched on 1/09/2016Project coordination: Anne Trémier, Irstea, France – [email protected]
DECISIVE:
A DECentralIzed management
Scheme for Innovative
Valorization of
urban biowastE
3
H2020 - Waste 6http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/2114-waste-6a-2015.html#tab1
• Promoting eco-innovative waste management and prevention as part of sustainable urban development
Objectifs :•Boosting eco-innovative solutions to prevent waste generation and promote the use of waste as a resource•Enhancing the natural and living environment in urban and peri-urban areas•Integrated urban metabolism approach with active engagement of all stakeholders
Waste 6-a : Eco-innovative solutions•Demonstration at an appropriate pilot scale, and market replication, of integrated eco-innovative cost- and energy-efficient technologies, processes and services for waste prevention, treatment, enhanced collection, recycling and recovery of high-grade valuable materials from waste. •Technological and non-technological solutions: economic and social approach•Including industry : SME as far as possible•Contribution from EU: 8 – 10 millions € / proposal => innovation action
4
Context
• The Urban area: a territory with a linear metabolism
• 50 % of world population
(84,3% European population
in 2050)
• 60-70 % of energy
consumption
• Very little energy and
material autonomy
• Waste production
• Increasing production of MSW (271 MT/year in Europe in 2020),
• Different type of materials in MSW and different recycling yields (collection + valorisation
rates):
• Organic waste = 14 to 47 % of MSW in Europe ; more than 60 % in developing
countries ; France : Big producers= 1,5 Mt/year ; Households ≈100 kg/inh/year
(production ≠ collection)
• Biowaste = Green waste from parks and gardens, waste from preparation and rest of
meals from households and restaurants, food waste from GMS, and equivalent waste
5
Context
• Centralised and macro-scale valorization always preferred in developed
countries
• Pro: Economic arguments
• Cons: Collection issues, environmental impacts• The decentralised way of thinking
• Domestic composting demonstrated prevention impact on waste production
• Decentralised valorization and micro-scale AD: a solution in developing countries
• Context of environmental policy: towards "Zero waste"
6
Project objectives
A new paradigm of management / recycling of urban organic waste by promoting the
establishment of decentralized treatment points networks favoring short circuits and
circular economy in the urban space
Concept of a resilient city using
organic waste to develop urban
farming and circular economy
Local sustainable energy supply
Waste biotreatment
New business opportunities
Spatial planning
Sustainable design
7
Expected Results
Organisational innovation:
• A to plan efficient (enough simple and accurate) decentralised management
scheme for urban organic solid waste based on urban metabolism study
Technological innovations:
• Micro-AD and biogas local valorisation
• SSF
Social results:
• Business and employment development
• Guidelines/advices for environmental Policy
8
Expected Impacts
Waste prevention:
• Residual waste reduction between 10 and 40%
Biowaste capture rate:
• Up to 80%
Energetic valorization:
• Energy recovery of 90% of the produced biogas
Environmental impacts:
• Reduce fossil-fuel consumption: Waste transport reduction; Repacement of fossil-energy by bioenergy
• Reduce landfills emissions
• Replacement of chemical molecules productionEconomic impacts:
• Business and employment development: sale of technologies; take off for urban farms business concept; new offer of waste management
• Decrease of waste management cost
9
An integrated project
Concept and tools
Consolidation platform
Innovation Demonstration
platform
Biowaste decentralised management
system: concept and impact
indicators
Decentralised AD and SSF processes
Integrated decision support tool for
planning system implementation
Demonstration implementation
Eco-innovation assessment
Communication and Dissemination
Multi-stakeholders
Research organisations ; public service ; association and
foundation working with cities ; waste operator ; process
sellers ; urban farm ; expert committee (public authorities,
citizens, politicians)
Multi-disciplinarity
Geographical analysis ; material flow analysis ; network
analysis ; environmental and sustainability assessment ;
economic and social assessment ; bioengineering ; waste
characterization
Waste
prevention
Social,
ecological and
economic
impacts
Business
outlooks
10
The consortium
13 partners:
• 5 academic partners; 4 SME ; 1 large company; 2 organizations working with public communities; 1 organisation managing waste for a local authority
1 (Coordinator) Irstea – Research unit GERE France Research Institute
2 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) – Composting research group Spain University
3 Aarhus University – ENVS (AU) Denmark University
4 Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH) – AWW-BIEM Group Germany University
5 Fundació ENT SpainNon-Profit
organization6 Innovative Technological Systems S.r.l. (ITS) Italy SME7 Aeris Tecnologias Ambientales S.L. Spain SME
8 ACR+ BelgiumNon-Profit
organization
9 Agència de Residus de Catalunya (ARC) Spain Public authority
10 PSUtec SPRL Belgium SME
11 Suez-Environnement (SE) France Large enterprise
12 GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Germany Research Institute
13 reFARMERS France SME
11
The consortium
Scientific networks : ORBIT/ECNTUHH – Bio Conversion and Emission Control (BIEM)
• regional and international waste management, biological waste collection, treatment and utilization processes and nutrient recovery.
• interdisciplinary approach to connect research closely with practice.
• experimental investigations in addition to simulation, modeling and conceptual design approaches.
UAB
• study of the compostability of diferent wastes (municipal and industrial wastes) and on the improvement of the composting process.
• Solid state fermentation (SSF). Enzymes such as lipases, proteases or cellulases or biopesticides and biosurfactants can be produced through SSF
and PEERAarhus University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Environmental Science (ENVS)
• Environmental Science, Industrial Ecology and Environmental Social Science
+ GEOMAR (Institut de recherche en Sciences marines)
• Historic partnership with ENVS
• Complex network modelling
ACADEMIC PARTNERS
12
The consortium
Stakeholders of the value chain promoted in the projectAERIS (contact UAB)
• Spanish start-up issued from UAB. Development and commercialization of waste and effluent recovery processes
ITS (contact TUHH)
• Italian start-up. Innovative development and production of high performance Stirling engines
Suez (contact Irstea)
•One of the world leaders in wastewater treatment and recovery
Refarmers (contact Pollutec)
• A young innovative company in the field of urban agriculture, which is particularly interested in organic techniques (cultivation in tanks, hydroponics, aquaponics), as well as in the recycling of organic waste into inputs (anaerobic digestion, vermicompost, bioconversion).
Partner specialized in project managementPSUTEC
• Belgian SME, project management/supervision (quality and risks management ; administrative and financial reporting)
ENTREPRISES
13
The consortium
Fondation ENT (contact UAB)
• ENT carries out projects at a local, regional, national and international level, mainly focused on:
� Elaboration of studies on domestic and community composting (potential, cost, waste treated, etc.).
� Waste prevention plans at local level.
� Projects on the prevention of food waste.
� Implementation of pay-as-you-throw schemes and waste charges.
� Economic analysis of waste management activities.
ACR+ (partner of a previous project LIFE+ MINIWASTE)
• International network of cities and regions that share the objective of promoting sustainable consumption of resources and waste management through prevention, reuse and recycling
ARC : Agence publique de gestion des déchets de la Catalogne (contact ACR+/ENT)
• Responsibility for waste collection and management� Municipal waste
� Industrial waste
� Construction waste and debris
� Manure & Livestock (jointly with Agriculture Department)
� Sanitary waste and
� Soil recovery
NGO AND PUBLIC SERVICES
14
The consortium
FranceIrstea, SE, Refarmers
EspagneUAB, AERIS, ENT, ARC
BelgiquePSUtec, ACR+
DanemarkUniv. Aarhus – ENVS
AllemagneTUHH, GEOMAR
ItalieITS
4
2
Development of
concepts/process
es and
assessment
methodsOperation and
marketing of
technologies and
services
Lead users
Communication /
Lobbying