Upload
vuanh
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
35
CONCERT PROGRAM
Peter OundjianMusic Director
William RowsonFanfare: Sesquie for Canada’s 150th (Apr 6 only; WORLD PREMIÈRE/TSO CO-COMMISSION)
Christine DonkinHopewell Cape: Sesquie for Canada’s 150th (Apr 7 only; TSO PREMIÈRE/TSO CO-COMMISSION)
Robert SchumannCello Concerto in A Minor, Op. 129I. Nicht zu schnell –
II. Langsam –
III. Sehr lebhaft
Intermission
Gustav Mahler/compl. Deryck CookeSymphony No. 10 in F-sharp Minor/MajorPart I:
1. Andante – Adagio
2. Scherzo I: Schnelle Viertel
Part II:
3. Purgatorio: Allegretto moderato
4. Scherzo II: Allegro pesante
5. Finale: Langsam, schwer – Allegro moderato
Thursday, April 6, 2017
8:00pm
Friday, April 7, 2017
7:30pm
Thomas Dausgaardconductor
Joseph Johnsoncello
Our own Principal Cello Joseph Johnson takes centre stage in this concert, with Toronto favourite Thomas Dausgaard leading the Orchestra. Schumann’s Cello Concerto is one of his most personal works, somewhat enigmatic in its refusal to embrace virtuosity for the sake of virtuosity. This is a very restrained piece, with no overt showiness (even the cadenza is very brief and is actually accompanied); it contains some of Schumann’s most intimate music, especially in the short but moving slow movement. Mahler’s symphonic odyssey was quite remarkable. From the wide-ranging First, through the powerhouse Fifth and Sixth, to the celebratory Eighth and deeply unsettling Ninth, his symphonies are visionary. The Tenth is the true summation of this great trajectory, written at the height of his abilities. It embraces a new kind of music, more astringent and challenging, but still beautiful and engaging.
Please note that these performances are being recorded for online release at TSO.CA/CanadaMosaic.
The April 6 concert is generously supported by George Fierheller.
36
THE DETAILS
The five years that Schumann spent in Dresden
produced little in the way of reward, artistically or
financially. Relief arrived in the autumn of 1849
when an old friend, Ferdinand Hiller, wrote to
offer the position of Municipal Music Director in
another German city, Düsseldorf. After a lengthy
period of hesitation, Schumann accepted the
job. It was his first public office—and it proved to
be his last.
One almost immediate product of the move was
his “Rhenish” Symphony, No. 3. Another was this
concerto, which he composed with typical speed.
Far from typical were the doubts about it that
arose later (as did the mental illness that would
lead to his death). Seeking to improve and polish
it, he went over it with several prominent cellists.
As late as 1854, the year it was published, he was
still tinkering with details. For unknown reasons,
the concerto does not appear to have been
performed in public until four years after his death.
The first significant cello concerto of the
nineteenth century, it is a beautiful, poetic work,
created virtually as much with the orchestra in
mind as the solo instrument. It continues two
of Schumann’s favoured procedures: the entire
piece is performed as a single, uninterrupted
whole, and some of its themes recur throughout
the piece, not just in one movement.
It opens with a brief, gentle orchestral prelude,
followed by a lyrical cello theme. The second
subject is romantic, as well. The movement
gains its sense of drama and conflict from the
development of these ideas and their interaction
with the orchestral theme heard at the start.
There is no solo cadenza. Instead, a quiet
transitional passage leads into the slow section.
Pizzicato strings introduce this haunting, dream-
like song without words, music perfectly suited
to the expressive side of the cello’s personality.
Schumann recalls the concerto’s prelude in the
passage which links the slow movement and
the finale. The last section is the most outgoing
portion of the concerto, and its most humorous.
The concerto’s only cadenza comes near the
end. In a bold, innovative step, it is accompanied
by the orchestra, rather than being performed,
as it would be traditionally, only by the soloist.
Following the cadenza, soloist and orchestra
race merrily to the concluding bars.
Program note by Don Anderson
Robert Schumann Cello Concerto in A Minor, Op. 129
Born: Zwickau, now in Germany, Jun 8, 1810 Died: Endenich, now in Germany, Jul 29, 1856Composed: 1850
26min
For program notes to William Rowson’s Fanfare: Sesquie
for Canada’s 150th and Christine Donkin’s Hopewell Cape:
Sesquie for Canada’s 150th, please turn to pages 7 and 8,
respectively, of the Sesquies Canada Mosaic program.
A “RAVISHING” WORKAlthough Schumann had doubts about his
Cello Concerto, his wife Clara, in contrast,
harboured no qualms whatsoever about the
piece. An entry in her diary from 1851 reads,
“I have played Robert’s Cello Concerto again
and thus procured for myself a truly magical
and happy hour. The romantic quality,
the flight, the freshness, and humour, and
also the highly interesting interweaving
of cello and orchestra are, indeed, wholly
ravishing, and what euphony and what deep
sentiment are in all the melodic passages!”
37
Gustav Mahler/compl. Deryck CookeSymphony No. 10 in F-sharp Minor/Major
Born: Kalischt, Bohemia, Jul 7, 1860 Died: Vienna, Austria, May 18, 1911Composed: 1910; compl. Deryck Cooke, 1960–1976
Mahler worked intently on his Tenth Symphony
over the summer of 1910, at his summer retreat
at Toblach, in the Italian Alps, but he never
finished it. For several decades after his death,
his widow Alma failed to find someone willing
to take on the daunting task of completing it (in
1924, the young Austrian composer Ernst Krenek
had created performing versions of the first and
third movements only). The challenge proved
more appealing in the 1950s and 60s, when
Mahler’s music was attracting new generations
of performers, listeners, and scholars, among
them an English musicologist and broadcaster
named Deryck Cooke (1919–1976).
Between 1959 and 1972, Cooke worked on
completing the Tenth Symphony, the process
of which included his close study of the
facsimile (both the 1924 edition showing 116
of 165 pages of sketches and drafts and a new
edition in 1967 that included 44 more pages
of sketches); absorbing input from conductors,
composers, and Mahler experts; and revising
his version accordingly. His final version of the
Tenth was first performed in London on October
13, 1972, with Wyn Morris conducting the New
Philharmonia Orchestra, and was published in
1976 (a revised edition appeared in 1989).
Mahler himself had spoken of the piece as
“fully prepared in the sketch,” and Cooke was
astonished to discover that it was, in a sense,
complete. The 165 surviving pages include
rough sketches, short scores (i.e. elaborations
on (usually) four or five staves), and draft
orchestrations for a five-movement work of just
under two thousand bars. It “continues without
interruption from beginning to end,” Cooke
wrote, “even if the continuity is only tenuously
preserved in places.”
Cooke’s task was to interpret the occasionally
messy and confusing notation of the manuscript;
correct obvious slips of the pen; fill out
missing or incomplete textures with “pastiche-
composing” (i.e. fake Mahler); complete the
preliminary scoring of the first half of the piece
and make a convincingly Mahlerian orchestration
of the second; and supply tempo, dynamic,
phrasing, and other performance markings. But
he left intact all of Mahler’s surviving thematic,
harmonic, rhythmic, contrapuntal, and formal
ideas, and obeyed such notes on orchestration
and performance as existed. The music we
hear in his version of the Tenth is original and
innovative, intensely expressive, profoundly
autobiographical. Even unfinished, Mahler’s
Tenth is a masterpiece.
Cooke’s version of the Tenth Symphony
represents Mahler’s definitive plan: a fascinating
five-movement “mirror” structure. Two great,
complementary slow movements, both well
over twenty minutes long, frame the work as
a whole; within, two scherzos, both about
twelve minutes long, frame the intermezzo-like
“Purgatorio,” which, at about four minutes, is the
shortest movement in any Mahler symphony.
The opening Adagio is a movement of
tremendous emotional power. It unfolds as
67min
continued on next page
38
THE DETAILS
an immense sonata form, with three principal
themes: the first is a brooding, near-atonal
recitative; the second, warm and passionate;
and the third is faster and lighter. After a bitter
and sardonic development section, the music
reaches a point of crisis in the recapitulation: the
brass, with terrifying power, announce a new,
chorale-like melody that reaches a harrowing
climax on a nine-note chord. In the long coda
that follows, built on motives from all three
themes, the music works gradually toward an
ethereal, radiant close.
The first Scherzo offers, in terms of rhythm, the
most complicated and “modern” music Mahler
ever wrote. This is an exuberant but off-kilter,
tongue-in-cheek dance, in which passing hints
of march, waltz, Ländler, and such, are ironically
undercut. The trio section, by contrast, is a study
in stability: it is a genuine Ländler, with an easy,
moderate, triple-time gait.
“Purgatorio”, though the shortest and strangest
movement, is the linchpin of the symphony. Its
inspiration was autobiographical—during the
summer of 1910, Mahler discovered that Alma
was having an affair with the brilliant young
architect Walter Gropius (who became her
second husband in 1915). The music, written
after this crisis, reflects the composer’s anguish;
in the middle of the movement, passionate
surges of string melody clearly allude to Alma.
The second Scherzo contrasts starkly with
the first, being much darker in tone. The
main scherzo section could be described as a
demonic dance; the trio, by contrast, is a simpler,
good-natured Viennese waltz. In the coda, the
music breaks up and dissolves right into the
Finale’s astonishing introduction, a grim funeral
march. Eventually, the funereal gloom does pass.
A moving new melody for a single flute, then a
warm outpouring in the strings, signal the start
of a musical process that, ultimately, achieves
something like redemption.
The finale itself is a kind of miniature symphony
in three movements (slow-fast-slow), and
though it has its own themes, it develops ideas
from the first movement, the fourth, and, most
significantly, “Purgatorio”. At its climax, we
hear the anguished nine-note dissonance that
underscored the climax in the first movement.
What follows, indeed, sounds very much like
healing, and transcendence. The finale closes, as
the symphony began—as a love song to Alma.
Program note by Kevin Bazzana
FOR ALMAMahler's Tenth
Symphony can be read,
ultimately, as a love
letter to his wife, Alma.
Just a few bars from
the end of the Finale,
Mahler suddenly
interpolates one last upsurge of romantic
melody in the strings, borrowing a motive
from “Purgatorio”. In the manuscript, at
this point, he wrote an exclamation that
leaves no doubt as to the motivation and
intended recipient of this last utterance—
and of the whole Tenth Symphony: “To live
for you, to die for you, Almschi!”
39
THE ARTISTSThomas Dausgaardconductor
Thomas Dausgaard made his TSO début in January 2002.
Thomas Dausgaard is Chief Conductor of the BBC
Scottish Symphony Orchestra, Chief Conductor of the
Swedish Chamber Orchestra, Principal Guest Conductor
of the Seattle Symphony, Honorary Conductor of the
Orchestra della Toscana (ORT), and Honorary Conductor
of the Danish National Symphony Orchestra, having previously served as its Principal
Conductor from 2004 to 2011. He is renowned for his creativity and innovation in
programming, the excitement of his live performances, and his extensive catalogue
of critically-acclaimed recordings. He regularly appears with the world’s leading
orchestras, including recent seasons in Europe, North America, Asia, and Australia.
As a recording artist, he enjoys long-standing relationships with the BIS and Da Capo
labels and has made well over 50 CDs, including the complete cycles of symphonies
by Beethoven, Schubert, Schumann, and Rued Langgaard. His most recent release is a
critically-acclaimed recording of Mahler’s Symphony No. 10 (Deryck Cooke, third version)
with the Seattle Symphony. Thomas Dausgaard has been awarded the Cross of Chivalry
by the Queen of Denmark, and elected to the Royal Academy of Music in Sweden.
Joseph Johnsoncello
TSO Principal Cello Joseph Johnson joined the TSO in 2010.
Joseph Johnson has been heard throughout the world
as a soloist, chamber musician, and educator. His festival
appearances include performances in all classical genres
at the American festivals of Santa Fe, Bach Dancing and
Dynamite Society, Bard, Cactus Pear, Grand Teton, and
Music in the Vineyards, as well as the Pacific Music Festival in Sapporo, Japan, and
the Virtuosi Festival in Brazil. Principal cellist of the Toronto Symphony Orchestra
since the 2010/11 season, he also serves as principal cellist of the Santa Fe Opera.
Mr. Johnson was previously principal cellist of the Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra
and prior to this position, he was a member of the Minnesota Orchestra cello
section for eleven years. He was a founding member of the Prospect Park Players
and the Minneapolis Quartet, the latter of which was honoured with The McKnight
Foundation Award in 2005. Currently, he is the cellist for the XIA Quartet. A graduate
of the Eastman School of Music, Joseph Johnson earned a master’s degree from
Northwestern University. Mr. Johnson performs on a magnificent Paolo Castello
cello, crafted in 1780, in Genoa.