5
Guidelines for Forestry Activities within High Priority Blanding’s Turtle Sites in the Northeastern United States Eastern Blanding’s Turtle Technical Committee (http://blandingsturtle.org) 1 DRAFT Summary.—is document provides an overview of recommended forestry management practices within “High Priority Sites” for Blanding’s turtle conservation in the northeastern United States, based on literature and unpublished data. Blanding’s turtles rely on a diversity of wetland types within broad forested regions of the northeastern United States. Active forestry is a prominent component of land management activities within a majority of High Priority Sites for Blanding’s turtles. Forestry activities can pose clear threats to the persistence of Blanding’s turtle populations primarily by 1.) exposing all age classes to elevated mortality caused by machinery; 2.) changing hydrology of overwintering wetlands; 3.) creating new access points for people into sites otherwise protected by their isolation; 4.) providing vectors for invasive plant species that can reduce upland and wetland habitat quality. However, in certain instances, forestry activities can improve local habitat quality by: 1.) creating new openings for nesting, and 2.) improving the habitat quality of forests surrounding wetlands used by Blanding’s turtle in the spring by increasing the radio of deciduous to coniferous tree species. Background.—e majority of freshwater turtle species in New England, New York, and Pennsylvania are of regional conservation concern. Many populations are expected to decline in abundance and distributional extent as a result of habitat fragmentation and degradation (NEPARC 2010), and localized extirpations have been documented. In the eastern United States, Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) is restricted to small, isolated populations in eastern New England, New York, and Pennsylvania, where populations are oen found where high-quality scrub-shrub, emergent, riverine, and vernal pool systems are closely juxtaposed with suitable nesting areas in relatively intact forested regions. Most High Priority Sites for Blanding’s turtle in the Northeast Region support some level of forestry activities. Mechanized forestry activities can pose clear threats to the persistence of Blanding’s turtle populations primarily by: 1.) exposing all age classes to elevated mortality caused by machinery; 2.) changing hydrology of overwintering wetlands; 3.) creating new access points for people into sites otherwise protected by their isolation; 4.) providing vectors for invasive plant species that can reduce upland and wetland habitat quality. However, in certain instances, forestry activities can improve local habitat quality by: 1.) creating new openings for nesting, and 2.) improving the habitat quality of forests surrounding wetlands used by Blanding’s turtle in the spring by increasing the radio of deciduous to coniferous tree species. Forestry Conservation Management Practices (CMPs) for Blanding’s turtle were developed for Massachusetts by Bol and Erb (2007). In this document, we expand and clarify their recommendations and adapt them to a broader geographic scope using a similar Objective / Rationale / Recommendations approach. Recommended guidelines for forestry activities in High Priority Blanding’s Turtle Sites follow. Blanding’s Turtle Active Season: 1 March to 15 September in most years, may vary depending on weather Blanding’s Turtle Dormant Season: 1 November to 28 February in most years, may vary depending on weather 2 Objectives and Guidelines for Forestry Activities in High Priority Blanding’s Turtle Sites (1) Prevent direct adult mortality caused by machinery, skidders, trucks, etc. 1 Prepared by Mike Jones and Liz Willey, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003. contact: [email protected] or [email protected] 2 Bol and Erb (2007) recommend a 600’ buer restriction on motorized vehicles between March 16 and September 15th; we have extended this window based on several instances of early emergence and basking (e.g., in 2002 and 2012). e window from September 16th to October 31 is variable annually and in warm years there may be frequent inter-wetland movements.

Guidelines for Forestry Activities within High Priority Blanding’s … · 2019. 11. 19. · blandings-turtle-cmp.pdf [Accessed May 1, 2013] Compton, B. 2007. Status Assessment for

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Guidelines for Forestry Activities within High Priority Blanding’s Turtle Sites in the Northeastern United StatesEastern Blanding’s Turtle Technical Committee (http://blandingsturtle.org)1 DRAFT

    Summary.—!is document provides an overview of recommended forestry management practices within “High Priority Sites” for Blanding’s turtle conservation in the northeastern United States, based on literature and unpublished data. Blanding’s turtles rely on a diversity of wetland types within broad forested regions of the northeastern United States. Active forestry is a prominent component of land management activities within a majority of High Priority Sites for Blanding’s turtles. Forestry activities can pose clear threats to the persistence of Blanding’s turtle populations primarily by 1.) exposing all age classes to elevated mortality caused by machinery; 2.) changing hydrology of overwintering wetlands; 3.) creating new access points for people into sites otherwise protected by their isolation; 4.) providing vectors for invasive plant species that can reduce upland and wetland habitat quality. However, in certain instances, forestry activities can improve local habitat quality by: 1.) creating new openings for nesting, and 2.) improving the habitat quality of forests surrounding wetlands used by Blanding’s turtle in the spring by increasing the radio of deciduous to coniferous tree species.

    Background.—!e majority of freshwater turtle species in New England, New York, and Pennsylvania are of regional conservation concern. Many populations are expected to decline in abundance and distributional extent as a result of habitat fragmentation and degradation (NEPARC 2010), and localized extirpations have been documented. In the eastern United States, Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii)  is restricted to small, isolated populations in eastern New England, New York, and Pennsylvania, where populations are o"en found where high-quality scrub-shrub, emergent, riverine, and vernal pool systems are closely juxtaposed with suitable nesting areas in relatively intact forested regions. Most High Priority Sites for Blanding’s turtle in the Northeast Region support some level of forestry activities. Mechanized forestry activities can pose clear threats to the persistence of Blanding’s turtle populations primarily by: 1.) exposing all age classes to elevated mortality caused by machinery; 2.) changing hydrology of overwintering wetlands; 3.) creating new access points for people into sites otherwise protected by their isolation; 4.) providing vectors for invasive plant species that can reduce upland and wetland habitat quality. However, in certain instances, forestry activities can improve local habitat quality by: 1.) creating new openings for nesting, and 2.) improving the habitat quality of forests surrounding wetlands used by Blanding’s turtle in the spring by increasing the radio of deciduous to coniferous tree species. Forestry Conservation Management Practices (CMPs) for Blanding’s turtle were developed for Massachusetts by Bol and Erb (2007). In this document, we expand and clarify their recommendations and adapt them to a broader geographic scope using a similar Objective / Rationale / Recommendations approach. Recommended guidelines for forestry activities in High Priority Blanding’s Turtle Sites follow.

    Blanding’s Turtle Active Season: 1 March to 15 September in most years, may vary depending on weatherBlanding’s Turtle Dormant Season: 1 November to 28 February in most years, may vary depending on weather2

    Objectives and Guidelines for Forestry Activities in High Priority Blanding’s Turtle Sites(1) Prevent direct adult mortality caused by machinery, skidders, trucks, etc.

    1 Prepared by Mike Jones and Liz Willey, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003. contact: [email protected] or [email protected]

    2 Bol and Erb (2007) recommend a 600’ bu!er restriction on motorized vehicles between March 16 and September 15th; we have extended this window based on several instances of early emergence and basking (e.g., in 2002 and 2012). "e window from September 16th to October 31 is variable annually and in warm years there may be frequent inter-wetland movements.

  • Elevated adult mortality is the leading cause of population decline at most Priority Sites, and it is necessary to minimize the risk of crushing adults during regular activities associated with forestry. To avoid crushing adult turtles during the early spring basking season (Figure 1) or during inter-wetland movements during the summer activity season, avoid all motorized vehicle use within 100 m (328’) of vernal pools, potential vernal pools, scrub-shrub swamps, and emergent wetlands, or other wetlands (Figure 2) known or predicted to be used by Blanding’s turtles, during the active season from 1 March to 15 September, unless snow and ice cover remains by 1 March. Where vernal pools occur within 200 m of permanent waterbodies, and where permanent wetlands are within 200 m of one another, avoid active-season motor vehicle use within the connecting area between the wetlands and the vernal pools (Figure 3). Where possible, schedule forestry activities during the winter inactive season between November 1st and February 28th, during which period the Blanding’s turtles will be overwintering underwater. As recommended by Bol and Erb (2007), wetlands should be crossed only when frozen solid. Active-season crossings should be minimized to the greatest extent possible and temporarily bridged. Harvesting trees within wetlands should be conducted in winter by hand-felling trees and winching them beyond the margin of the wetland.

    (2) Minimize mortality of nests, hatchlings, and juvenile turtles. Do not stage heavy equipment or use motor vehicles between 15 May and 15 September in known or likely nesting areas such as gravel pits or powerlines with stable, coarse, sand- or sand/gravel substrates and sparse or scrubby vegetation (see Guidelines for Nest Site Management, EBTTC 2014a). Where such

    Blanding’s Turtle Conservation Plan: Forestry Guidelines

    2

    Figure 1. In March, April, and May, Blanding’s turtles bask frequently in patches of sun in deciduous forests surrounding high-quality vernal pools, emergent marshes, and shrub swamps. Restricting active-season logging within a 30 m bu!er from all potential wetlands, and within corridors where these wetlands are within 100 m of one another, will reduce the probability of crushing adult turtles. During the summer, Blanding’s turtles cross overland between vernal pools and permanent wetlands and to and from nesting areas.

  • staging is necessary within known nesting areas, establish a secure perimeter with silt fence and conduct morning sweeps of the site prior to beginning daily work.

    (3) Improve, expand, or create new nesting habitat. In coordination with High Priority Site Leaders and State Coordinators, identify potential new nesting areas within the interior of the site more than several hundred meters from roads and residences (see Guidelines for Nest Site Management, EBTTC 2014) and within 200 m of known or predicted high-use wetlands.

    (4) Avoid changes to wetland hydrology during overwintering season (October to April). Blanding’s turtles overwinter in deep, emergent or scrub-shrub wetlands from October to April. Forestry activities must not alter the hydrology of known or suspected overwintering wetlands during the dormant period. For example, it is necessary that beaver dams be le" in place during the dormant season.

    Blanding’s Turtle Conservation Plan: Forestry Guidelines

    3

    Figure 2. Blanding’s turtles use a wide range of permanent and temporary waterbodies and wetlands including scrub-shrub and emergent wetlands (top le#; top center); recent beaver impoundments (top right); vernal pools in deciduous forest (bottom le#); open temporary wetlands near nesting sites (bottom right). In all cases within Priority Blanding’s Turtle Sites, identifying known and potential wetland habitats is a necessary step toward designating o!-limits areas during the turtle activity season.

  • (5) Avoid disturbance to vernal pool habitats year-round. All vernal pools and potential vernal pools (as determined by state-speci#c guidelines) must be avoided completely year-round.

    (6) Avoid introducing aquatic or terrestrial invasive plant species. Do not bring o$site #ll onto High Priority Blanding’s Turtle Sites.

    Blanding’s Turtle Conservation Plan: Forestry Guidelines

    4

    Figure 3. Typical Blanding’s turtle upland and wetland mosaic in eastern Massachusetts.

  • Literature Cited

    Beaudry, F., P.G. deMaynadier, and M.L. Hunter, Jr. 2010. Nesting movements and the use of anthropogenic nesting sites by spotted turtles (Clemmys guttata) and Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii). Herpetological Conservation and Biology 5(1): 1–8.

    Bol, L., and L. Erb. 2007. Massachusetts Forestry Conservation Management Practices for Blanding’s Turtles. Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program; Westborough, MA. At website: http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dfg/nhesp/regulatory-review/blandings-turtle-cmp.pdf [Accessed May 1, 2013]

    Compton, B. 2007. Status Assessment for Blanding’s Turtle in the Northeast. Report prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 118 pp.

    Grgurovic, Mark. 2006. Habitat selection and movement patterns of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) in Massachusetts. MS !esis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

    Jones, M.T., and P.R. Sievert. 2012. Elevated mortality of hatchling Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) in residential landscapes. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 7(1): 89–94.

    Kiviat, E., G. Stevens, R. Brauman, S. Hoeger, P.J. Petokas, and G.G. Hollands. 2000. Restoration of wetland and upland habitat for the Blanding’s turtle, Emydoidea blandingii. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3(4): 650–657.

    Marchand, M., and J. Litvaitis. 2004. E$ects of landscape composition, habitat features, and nest distribution on predation rates of simulated turtle nests. Biological Conservation 117: 243.

    Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (MA NHESP). 2009. Advisory guidelines for creating turtle nesting habitat. At website: http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dfg/nhesp/species-and-conservation/creating-turtle-nesting-sites.pdf

    New York Invasive Species Clearinghouse (NYIS). 2013. New York Invasive Species Information website. At website: http://www.nyis.info/?action=israt_nn_plant

    Northeast Partners in Amphibian and Reptile Conservation (NEPARC). 2010. Northeast Amphibian and Reptile Species of Regional Responsibility and Conservation Concern. At website: http://www.northeastparc.org/products/neresponsibility.htm

    Blanding’s Turtle Conservation Plan: Forestry Guidelines

    5