Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Global Urban Economic Competitiveness Report 2013-2014
Shen Li
In 2011, the global economic growth slowed down to 3.125%, down 0.155 percentage point
from 4.28% in 2010. The growth of different types of economies was differentiated: the economic
growth rate of high-income countries was only 1.848%, lower than the global average, that of
middle-income countries was 5.969%, above the global average, and that of low-income countries,
3.478%, the same as the global average. In 2011, global imports of goods and services accounted
for 29.931% of GDP, rising for two consecutive years, while global exports of goods and services
accounted for 30.496% of GDP, also rising for two consecutive years. Global integration was
accelerating. Global urbanization continued to progress in 2011 and reached the rate of 52.103%,
up 0.458 percentage point from 51.645% in 2010. The global level of science and technology
continued to improve, with the number of non-resident patent applications reaching 713,148, a
consecutive increase since 2009.
1.Asian cities are on the rise, and the world’s urban economic
competitiveness gap has narrowed
1.1 The economic competitiveness pattern of the world's top cities tends to stabilize, and
the economic competitiveness of Asian cities and science and technology cities is rising. As far
as the top 20 cities in the global economic competitiveness are concerned, the overall pattern is
gradually stabilizing. In 2011, there were six North American cities, nine European cities and five
Asian cities. Among them, Asian cities rose significantly, Doha rose 5, Shenzhen rose 12. On the
other hand, the economic competitiveness of science and technology cities has been greatly
improved, the most typical is San Jose, the United States, in 2011, San Jose's urban economic
competitiveness ranked 18th, five places higher than the previous year, a large increase.
Table 1 Top 20 Global Urban Economic Competitiveness and Its Changes
City CountryContinen
t
Economic
competitiveness
Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
New York-
Newark
United
States of
North
America
1 1 23 23 3 4
America
Singapore Singapore Asia 2 2 3 3 20 17Munich Germany Europe 3 4 1 1 74 84Moscow Russia Europe 4 3 55 58 6 3
Paris France Europe 5 5 43 43 11 9Hong Kong China Asia 6 6 11 13 32 31
Doha Qatar Asia 7 12 49 55 16 16
Houston
United
States of
America
North
America8 9 64 68 14 13
Vienna Austria Europe 9 8 5 4 158 141Geneva Switzerland Europe 10 11 2 2 286 269
San
Francisco-
Oakland
United
States of
America
North
America11 10 19 19 45 42
LondonUnited
KingdomEurope 12 7 21 21 47 35
Frankfurt
am MainGermany Europe 13 13 4 5 200 202
Shenzhen China Asia 14 26 119 136 10 12
Boston
United
States of
America
North
America15 14 30 31 41 43
Shanghai China Asia 16 21 185 195 2 1Milan Italy Europe 17 15 16 15 85 90
San Jose
United
States of
America
North
America18 23 26 28 61 69
Baltimore
United
States of
America
North
America19 17 13 12 116 109
Dusseldorf Germany Europe 20 16 7 7 243 233
1.2 Cities in emerging countries such as Asia have risen steadily and European cities
have declined relatively. Looking at the number and changes of the top 200 cities on all
continents, it can be found that in 2011, the number of Asian cities was 53, an increase of 5 over
the previous year. At the same time, the number of European cities is 61, a decrease of 4, the
overall state of relative decline.
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180
-90
-60
-30
0
30
60
90
Figure Changes in Global Urban Competitiveness Ranking
Note: Red indicates a rise in global urban competitiveness ranking while blue indicates a decline.
Table 2 The Number and Ranking Changes of Top 200 Cities in Each Continent
ContinentNumber of top 200
cities before 2011
Number of top
200 cities before
2010
Difference
Asia 53 48 5
North
America70 71 -1
South
America8 8 0
Africa 1 1 0
Oceania 7 7 0
Europe 61 65 -4
1.3 The overall competitiveness of the global urban economy has increased slightly, and
the degree of differentiation between different cities has narrowed. In 2011, global urban
economic competitiveness averaged 0.662, an increase of 0.002 over the previous year and a
coefficient of variation of 0.172, a decrease of 0.002 over the previous year. Among them, the
average of comprehensive density competitiveness and comprehensive incremental
competitiveness were 0.380 and 0.766, respectively, up 0.002 and -0.003 respectively from the
previous year.
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180
-90
-60
-30
0
30
60
90
Figure Distribution of Global Urban Competitiveness
Table 3 Statistical Analysis of Economic Competitiveness
Variable Sample size MeanStandard
deviation
Coefficient of
variation
2011年
Economic
competitiveness 1006 0.662 0.114 0.172
Comprehensive
density
competitiveness
1006 0.380 0.212 0.557
Comprehensive
increment
competitiveness
1006 0.766 0.050 0.065
2010年
Economic
competitiveness 1006 0.660 0.115 0.174
Comprehensive
density
competitiveness
1006 0.378 0.215 0.567
Comprehensive
increment
competitiveness
1006 0.769 0.050 0.065
1.4 Oceania has the highest average economic competitiveness, followed by North
American and European cities, with Asian cities in the middle and South American and
African cities at the bottom. Looking at the economic competitiveness of cities on all continents,
it can be found that the average economic competitiveness of cities in Oceania is 0.831, that of
North America and Europe is 0.762 and 0.743, respectively, and that of Asian cities is 0.32, which
is closer to European and American cities, and that of African cities is 0.572, which is the last.
Table 4 Statistical Analysis of Economic Competitiveness by Continent
Continent
Economic competitiveness Comprehensive density
competitiveness
Comprehensive increment
competitiveness
MeanCoefficient
of variationMean
Coefficient of
variationMean
Coefficient of
variation
Asia 0.632 0.148 0.307 0.524 0.769 0.062
North
America0.762 0.127 0.591 0.318 0.778 0.046
South
America0.680 0.104 0.416 0.294 0.769 0.049
Oceania 0.831 0.042 0.701 0.082 0.812 0.035
Europe 0.743 0.166 0.571 0.393 0.770 0.040
Africa 0.572 0.166 0.233 0.602 0.725 0.109
5. The average level of economic competitiveness of G20 cities is higher than that of
non-G20 cities, and the internal gap is smaller than that of non-G20 cities. In Table 5, it can
be found that the average economic competitiveness of G20 cities is 0.678, which is slightly
higher than that of non-G20 cities, and the two sub-indicators of comprehensive density
competitiveness and comprehensive incremental competitiveness are also higher than that of non-
G20 cities. At the same time, the coefficient of variation of economic competitiveness of G20
cities is 0.163, which is smaller than that of non-G20 cities.
Table 5 Statistical Analysis of the G20 Economic Competitiveness
Variable Sample size MeanStandard
deviation
Coefficient of
variation
G20
Economic
competitiveness 726 0.678 0.111 0.163
Comprehensive
density
competitiveness
726 0.406 0.211 0.521
Comprehensive
increment
competitiveness
726 0.775 0.044 0.057
Non-G20 Economic
competitiveness
280 0.620 0.112 0.180
Comprehensive
density
competitiveness
280 0.314 0.198 0.631
Comprehensive
increment
competitiveness
280 0.745 0.058 0.077
2.Economic competitiveness of European cities has generally declined and
Asian cities have improved
2.1 The internal differentiation of economic competitiveness of North American cities
accelerated. Comparing the changes in the economic competitiveness of North American cities in
2011 and 2010, it can be found that the differentiation between different cities is increasing. San
Jose, Dallas and other cities have improved, respectively, up 5 and 9, and Bridgeport, Hartford and
other cities have declined to varying degrees, the overall trend of differentiation and expansion.
Table 6 Economic Competitiveness Ranking of Top 10 Cities in North America 2010 vs. 2011
City Country
Economic
competitiveness
Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
New York-
Newark USA1 1 23 23 3 4
Houston USA 8 9 64 68 14 13San Francisco-
Oakland USA11 10 19 19 45 42
Boston USA 15 14 30 31 41 43San Jose USA 18 23 26 28 61 69
Baltimore USA 19 17 13 12 116 109Bridgeport USA 21 18 6 6 291 298
Dallas USA 29 38 84 87 26 29Cleveland USA 30 33 9 9 327 354Hartford USA 33 27 8 8 348 247
2.2 The overall economic competitiveness of European cities has declined. Looking at the
top 10 European economic competitiveness ranking and changes in 2011, we can find that the
economic competitiveness ranking of Moscow, Vienna, London, Milan, Dusseldorf, Zurich and
other cities fell by 1,1,5,2,4 and 4 respectively. Overall, the economic competitiveness of
European cities has declined.
Table 7 Economic Competitiveness Ranking of Top 10 Cities in Europe 2010 vs. 2011
City Country
Economic
competitiveness
Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
MunichGerman
y3 4 1 1 74 84
Moscow Russia 4 3 55 58 6 3Paris France 5 5 43 43 11 9
Vienna Austria 9 8 5 4 158 141
GenevaSwitzerl
and10 11 2 2 286 269
London
United
Kingdo
m
12 7 21 21 47 35
Frankfurt
am Main
German
y13 13 4 5 200 202
Milan Italy 17 15 16 15 85 90
DusseldorfGerman
y20 16 7 7 243 233
ZurichSwitzerl
and23 19 12 11 139 128
2.3 Asian cities, especially Chinese cities, have made varying degrees of progress in their
economic competitiveness. Looking at the ranking and changes of Asia's top 10 economic
competitiveness in 2011, we can find that the urban economic competitiveness of Shenzhen,
Shanghai and Guangzhou in China has achieved a certain degree of progress, raising 12,5 and 15
respectively. In addition, Qatar's Doha and Israel's Tel Aviv rose five places. Overall, the economic
competitiveness of Asian cities, especially Chinese cities, is advancing slightly.
Table 8 Economic Competitiveness Ranking of Top 10 Cities in Asia 2010 vs. 2011
City Country
Economic
competitiveness
Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
Singapore Singapore 2 2 3 3 20 17
Hong Kong China 6 6 11 13 32 31Doha Qatar 7 12 49 55 16 16
Shenzhen China 14 26 119 136 10 12Shanghai China 16 21 185 195 2 1
SeoulRepublic
of Korea22 22 110 114 13 14
Nagoya Japan 24 20 33 32 53 51Tel Aviv-Jaffa Israel 31 36 44 46 69 75
Guangzhou China 38 53 187 200 7 8Kitakyushu-
FukuokaJapan 39 35 102 102 22 19
2.4 South American city economic competitiveness differentiation is obvious. Looking at
the ranking and changes of the top 10 economic competitiveness in South America in 2011, we
can see that the economic competitiveness of the cities of São Paulo, Montevideo, Jundiai and
Lima has improved to varying degrees, but the economic competitiveness of the cities of Buenos
Aires, Maracaibo and Maracay has declined significantly.
Table 9 Economic Competitiveness Ranking of Top 10 Cities in South America 2010 vs. 2011
City Country
Economic
competitiveness
Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
Sao Paulo Brazil 28 29 176 178 5 5Buenos Aires Argentina 37 31 151 155 12 10
Caracas Venezuela 147 123 148 151 222 101Rio de Janeiro Brazil 160 160 229 229 46 47Montevideo Uruguay 165 169 168 176 199 209
Santiago de Chile Chile 81 82 74 75 134 132Maracaibo Venezuela 180 163 178 177 236 157
Jundiai Brazil 188 198 165 174 397 389Maracay Venezuela 215 206 189 186 380 281
Lima Peru 219 227 271 274 64 61
2.5 The overall economic competitiveness of African cities has declined. Looking at the
ranking and changes of Africa's top 10 economic competitiveness in 2011, it can be found that the
overall economic competitiveness of African cities has declined. For example, Tripoli's urban
economic competitiveness fell 64 places, Cape Town fell 13 places, Benghazi fell 49 places, only
a few such as Lagos to achieve economic competitiveness.
Table 10 Economic Competitiveness Ranking of Top 10 Cities in Africa 2010 vs. 2011
City Country
Economic
competitiveness
Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
Tripoli Libya 184 120 101 72 928 656Luanda Angola 211 213 243 243 75 74Pretoria South Africa 251 247 220 218 304 288
Johannesbur
gSouth Africa 262 253 270 267 137 129
Oran Algeria 282 275 235 230 622 591Lagos Nigeria 324 330 371 365 127 135
Cape Town South Africa 354 341 333 315 435 390Benghazi Libya 356 307 289 265 750 573Nairobi Kenya 364 357 346 341 411 421Durban South Africa 392 386 381 375 388 370
3.China's urban economic competitiveness has steadily advanced, and the
overall economic competitiveness of cities in the United States and Germany is
stable
3.1 The overall competitiveness of Indian cities has regressed. Looking at the ranking and
changes of economic competitiveness of the top 10 cities in India in 2011, we can find that the
overall economic competitiveness of Indian cities has declined, and the ranking of economic
competitiveness of Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, Pune, Hyderabad, Kollam and Kolkata declined
in varying degrees. Similarly, the economic density competitiveness and economic incremental
competitiveness of Indian cities have also declined to some extent.
Table 11 Economic Competitiveness Ranking of Top 10 Cities in India 2010 vs. 2011
City
Economic competitiveness Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
Delhi 266 266 322 320 66 66Mumbai 308 301 377 370 76 70
Bangalore 367 359 390 386 182 173
Chennai 408 406 428 424 210 206Pune 523 504 549 535 376 358
Hyderabad 525 507 586 584 218 216Coimbatore 534 536 516 513 611 625
Kochi 537 540 488 492 685 695Kollam 580 571 534 523 696 710Kolkata 583 570 657 646 226 232
3.2 China's urban economic competitiveness has steadily advanced. Looking at the
ranking and changes of the economic competitiveness of the top 10 cities in China in 2011, we can
find that the economic competitiveness of Shenzhen, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Beijing, Suzhou,
Taipei, Macao, Tianjin and Wuxi have all increased to varying degrees, of which Tianjin and Wuxi
have the largest increase, rising 19 places. Similarly, the economic density competitiveness and
economic incremental competitiveness of Chinese cities have also increased to a certain extent,
thus, the economic competitiveness of Chinese cities has steadily advanced.
Table 12 Economic Competitiveness Ranking of Top 10 Cities in China 2010 vs. 2011
City
Economic competitiveness Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
Hong Kong 6 6 11 13 32 31Shenzhen 14 26 119 136 10 12Shanghai 16 21 185 195 2 1
Guangzhou 38 53 187 200 7 8Beijing 43 55 247 253 1 2Suzhou 49 59 207 214 8 6Taipei 52 58 51 52 98 107Macao 59 72 29 45 339 369Tianjin 66 85 240 259 4 7Wuxi 100 119 216 225 23 23
3.3 The economic competitiveness of Nigerian cities has generally declined. Looking at
the ranking and changes in the economic competitiveness of the top 10 cities in Nigeria in 2011,
we can find that the economic competitiveness of most cities in Nigeria has declined to some
extent, and only a few cities, such as Lagos, have made small progress.
Table 13 Economic Competitiveness Ranking of Top 10 Cites in Nigeria 2010 vs. 2011
City
Economic competitiveness Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
Lagos 324 330 371 365 127 135Benin City 394 393 358 359 582 580
Port
Harcourt405 405 401 399 323 332
Owerri 467 453 415 410 647 650Aba 481 475 421 417 681 678Uyo 488 486 444 444 631 628
Abuja 510 503 498 488 558 562Warri 520 510 468 456 712 713
Ikorodu 532 522 430 426 822 821Kano 533 521 513 500 609 604
3.4 The overall economic competitiveness of Brazilian cities has declined significantly.
Looking at the economic competitiveness ranking and changes of the top 10 cities in Brazil in
2011, we can find that the economic competitiveness ranking of other cities outside São Paulo,
Jundiai and other cities has degrees. Among them, Brasilia, Campinas, Greater Vitória, Belo
Horizonte and Ribeiro Pretu fell by 6,5,12,11 and 7 respectively.
Table 14 Economic Competitiveness Ranking of Top 10 Cities in Brazil 2010 vs. 2011
City
Economic competitiveness Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
Sao Paulo 28 29 176 178 5 5Rio de Janeiro 160 160 229 229 46 47
Jundiai 188 198 165 174 397 389Brasilia 225 219 232 233 130 117
Porto Alegre 226 225 210 209 260 242Campinas 244 239 234 235 154 150
Sao Jose dos Campos 286 282 238 236 607 606Greater Vitória 292 280 275 269 356 323Belo Horizonte 299 288 321 313 133 122Ribeirao Preto 304 297 261 254 619 601
3.5 The economic competitiveness pattern of American cities is generally stable, and
some cities have made progress. Looking at the ranking and changes in the economic
competitiveness of the top 10 cities in the United States in 2011, we can see that most cities'
economic competitiveness ranking has not changed significantly, but San Jose and Dallas have
made significant progress, rising by 5 and 9 respectively.
Table 15 Economic Competitiveness Ranking of Top 10 Cities in the United States of America 2010 vs. 2011
City
Economic
competitiveness
Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
New York-Newark 1 1 23 23 3 4Houston 8 9 64 68 14 13
San Francisco-Oakland 11 10 19 19 45 42Boston 15 14 30 31 41 43
San Jose 18 23 26 28 61 69Baltimore 19 17 13 12 116 109Bridgeport 21 18 6 6 291 298
Dallas 29 38 84 87 26 29Cleveland 30 33 9 9 327 354Hartford 33 27 8 8 348 247
3.6 The economic competitiveness of German cities is generally stable. Looking at the
economic competitiveness ranking and changes in the top 10 cities in Germany in 2011, we can
find that the economic competitiveness ranking of Frankfurt, Hanover and other cities has not
changed, and the economic competitiveness ranking of other cities has changed very little.
Similarly, the top 10 cities' ranking of economic density competitiveness has been very small. It
can be seen that the economic competitiveness pattern of German cities is generally stable.
Table 16 Economic Competitiveness Ranking of Top 10 Cites in Germany 2010 vs. 2011
City
Economic competitiveness Economic density
competitiveness
Economic increment
competitiveness
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
Ranking
Munich 3 4 1 1 74 84
Frankfurt am
Main13 13 4 5 200 202
Dusseldorf 20 16 7 7 243 233Stuttgart 25 24 10 10 161 164Hamburg 27 28 14 14 180 170Cologne 34 32 15 16 203 199Berlin 36 37 37 39 100 97
Hannover 40 40 17 18 272 263Dortmund 55 57 24 25 409 411Dresden 99 102 80 82 360 351
Global Urban Economic Competitiveness Rankcity country score ranking city country score ranking
New York-Newark U.S.A. 1.0000 1 Phnom Penh Cambodia 0.6397 504
Singapore Singapore 0.9963 2 Yingtan China 0.6396 505
Munich Germany 0.9698 3 Baoji China 0.6396 506
Moscow Russian 0.9614 4 Tabriz Iran 0.6393 507
Paris France 0.9577 5 Xining China 0.6388 508
Hong Kong China 0.9517 6 Culiacan Mexico 0.6384 509
Doha Qatar 0.9347 7 Abuja Nigeria 0.6379 510
Houston U.S.A. 0.9292 8 Trujillo Peru 0.6375 511
Vienna Austria 0.9272 9 Juiz De Fora Brazil 0.6369 512
Geneva Switzerland 0.9253 10 Tieling China 0.6368 513
San Francisco-Oakland U.S.A. 0.9252 11 Yibin China 0.6367 514
London U.K. 0.9231 12 Yangquan China 0.6366 515
Frankfurt am Main Germany 0.9219 13 Sanmenxia China 0.6360 516
Shenzhen China 0.9157 14 Nanyang China 0.6359 517
Boston U.S.A. 0.9140 15 Jincheng China 0.6357 518
Shanghai China 0.9115 16 Palembang Indonesia 0.6356 519
Milan Italy 0.9108 17 Warri Nigeria 0.6354 520
San Jose U.S.A. 0.9101 18 Changzhi China 0.6354 521
Baltimore U.S.A. 0.9100 19 Shiyan China 0.6354 522
Dusseldorf Germany 0.9092 20 Pune India 0.6352 523
Bridgeport-Stamford U.S.A. 0.9063 21 Panzhihua China 0.6350 524
Seoul Republic of Korea 0.9058 22 Hyderabad India 0.6348 525
Zurich Switzerland 0.9051 23 Kemerovo Russian 0.6345 526
Nagoya Japan 0.9049 24 Yangjiang China 0.6343 527
Stuttgart Germany 0.9023 25 Xingtai China 0.6339 528
Stockholm Sweden 0.9000 26 Changde China 0.6339 529
Hamburg Germany 0.8951 27 Hengshui China 0.6338 530
Sao Paulo Brazil 0.8928 28 Joao Pessoa Brazil 0.6336 531
Dallas-Fort Worth U.S.A. 0.8914 29 Ikorodu Nigeria 0.6331 532
Cleveland U.S.A. 0.8900 30 Kano Nigeria 0.6330 533
Tel Aviv-Yafo Israel 0.8898 31 Coimbatore India 0.6329 534
Brussels Belgium 0.8897 32 Hermosillo Mexico 0.6324 535
Hartford U.S.A. 0.8895 33 Heze China 0.6323 536
Cologne Germany 0.8891 34 Kochi India 0.6323 537
Philadelphia U.S.A. 0.8866 35 Deyang China 0.6323 538
Berlin Germany 0.8853 36 Irkutsk Russian 0.6323 539
Buenos Aires Argentina 0.8843 37 Vereeniging South Africa 0.6317 540
Guangzhou China 0.8840 38 Gaza State of Palestine 0.6317 541
Kitakyushu-Fukuoka Japan 0.8840 39 Sanya China 0.6311 542
Hannover Germany 0.8828 40 Ziyang China 0.6311 543
Milwaukee U.S.A. 0.8816 41 Tbilisi Georgia 0.6309 544
Seattle U.S.A. 0.8799 42 Xalapa Mexico 0.6309 545
Beijing China 0.8780 43 Tongliao China 0.6308 546
Richmond U.S.A. 0.8744 44 Chaozhou China 0.6306 547
Hiroshima Japan 0.8742 45 Puebla Mexico 0.6306 548
Oslo Norway 0.8720 46 Orenburg Russian 0.6306 549
Raleigh U.S.A. 0.8719 47 Mianyang China 0.6305 550
Toronto Canada 0.8704 48 Guilin China 0.6301 551
Suzhou China 0.8701 49 Tonghua China 0.6298 552
Rome Italy 0.8696 50 Mudanjiang China 0.6296 553
Washington, D.C. U.S.A. 0.8696 51 Ibadan Nigeria 0.6294 554
Taipei China 0.8693 52 Qingyuan China 0.6285 555
Salt Lake City U.S.A. 0.8688 53 Florianopolis Brazil 0.6282 556
Copenhagen Denmark 0.8679 54 Medan Indonesia 0.6281 557
Dortmund Germany 0.8676 55 Tegucigalpa Honduras 0.6280 558
Amsterdam Netherlands 0.8674 56 Cochabamba Bolivia 0.6280 559
Sydney Australia 0.8658 57 Zaria Nigeria 0.6273 560
Ulsan Republic of Korea 0.8647 58 Santa Cruz Bolivia 0.6272 561
Macao China 0.8645 59 Shizuishan China 0.6271 562
Perth Australia 0.8639 60 Cuernavaca Mexico 0.6271 563
Melbourne Australia 0.8625 61 Xinxiang China 0.6264 564
Baton Rouge U.S.A. 0.8624 62 Ho Chi Minh City Viet Nam 0.6262 565
Antwerp Belgium 0.8620 63 Khabarovsk Russian 0.6261 566
Los Angeles-Long Beach-
Santa AnaU.S.A. 0.8598 64 Xianyang China 0.6258 567
Rotterdam Netherlands 0.8587 65 Siping China 0.6258 568
Tianjin China 0.8583 66 Teresina Brazil 0.6258 569
Chicago U.S.A. 0.8562 67 Ningde China 0.6256 570
Orlando U.S.A. 0.8556 68 Leshan China 0.6254 571
Sapporo Japan 0.8552 69 Hengyang China 0.6254 572
Hague Netherlands 0.8532 70 Makassar Indonesia 0.6248 573
Nashville-Davidson U.S.A. 0.8519 71 Karachi Pakistan 0.6243 574
Louisville U.S.A. 0.8519 72 Zhoukou China 0.6243 575
Riyadh Saudi Arabia 0.8516 73 Kampala Uganda 0.6240 576
Denver-Aurora U.S.A. 0.8515 74 Campo Grande Brazil 0.6237 577
Barcelona Spain 0.8505 75 Chihuahua Mexico 0.6236 578
Calgary Canada 0.8495 76 Wuzhou China 0.6227 579
Virginia Beach U.S.A. 0.8489 77 Kollam India 0.6226 580
Manchester U.K. 0.8451 78 Zhumadian China 0.6223 581
Las Vegas U.S.A. 0.8443 79 San Pedro Sula Honduras 0.6223 582
Miami U.S.A. 0.8436 80 Kolkata India 0.6222 583
San Diego U.S.A. 0.8427 81 Jingzhou China 0.6222 584
Hamilton Canada 0.8415 82 Luzhou China 0.6221 585
Birmingham U.K. 0.8410 83 Feira De Santana Brazil 0.6215 586
Madrid Spain 0.8387 84 Ganzhou China 0.6214 587
Helsinki Finland 0.8385 85 Lishui China 0.6213 588
Sendai Japan 0.8381 86 Cuiaba Brazil 0.6211 589
Jedda Saudi Arabia 0.8361 87 Huainan China 0.6208 590
Gold Coast Australia 0.8358 88 Zhanjiang China 0.6200 591
Montreal Canada 0.8331 89 Datong China 0.6197 592
Vancouver Canada 0.8330 90 Pachuca de Soto Mexico 0.6194 593
Charlotte U.S.A. 0.8322 91 Shangrao China 0.6188 594
Lille France 0.8287 92 Malappuram India 0.6183 595
Minneapolis-Saint Paul U.S.A. 0.8281 93 Novosibirsk Russian 0.6183 596
Atlanta U.S.A. 0.8275 94 Liupanshui China 0.6181 597
Haifa Israel 0.8258 95 Mashhad Iran 0.6180 598
Dublin Ireland 0.8245 96 Pereira Colombia 0.6177 599
New Haven U.S.A. 0.8236 97 Hanoi Viet Nam 0.6177 600
Colorado Springs U.S.A. 0.8235 98 Casablanca Morocco 0.6166 601
Dresden Germany 0.8221 99 Yulin(GX) China 0.6166 602
Wuxi China 0.8216 100 Khartoum Sudan 0.6165 603
Essen Germany 0.8216 101 Dazhou China 0.6159 604
Kansas City U.S.A. 0.8215 102 Astrakhan' Russian 0.6157 605
Bristol U.K. 0.8207 103 Jingdezhen China 0.6156 606
Changwon Republic of Korea 0.8184 104 Beihai China 0.6155 607
Indianapolis U.S.A. 0.8183 105 Xinyang China 0.6155 608
Columbus U.S.A. 0.8171 106 Ahmedabad India 0.6153 609
West Yorkshire U.K. 0.8167 107 Barranquilla Colombia 0.6150 610
Birmingham U.K. 0.8163 108 Bucaramanga Colombia 0.6149 611
Provo-Orem U.S.A. 0.8162 109 Yiyang China 0.6149 612
Allentown U.S.A. 0.8160 110 Lahore Pakistan 0.6144 613
Oklahoma City U.S.A. 0.8155 111 Meishan China 0.6144 614
Charleston-North
CharlestonU.S.A. 0.8151 112 Krasnoyarsk Russian 0.6141 615
Worcester U.S.A. 0.8149 113 Sulaymaniyah Iraq 0.6141 616
Foshan China 0.8146 114 Huambo Angola 0.6137 617
Leipzig Germany 0.8139 115 Kaifeng China 0.6135 618
Ottawa-Gatineau Canada 0.8133 116 Shaoguan China 0.6132 619
Providence U.S.A. 0.8130 117 Mersin Turkey 0.6132 620
Austin U.S.A. 0.8128 118 Weinan China 0.6130 621
Qingdao China 0.8128 119 Padang Indonesia 0.6130 622
Medina Saudi Arabia 0.8117 120 Alexandria Egypt 0.6121 623
Liverpool U.K. 0.8103 121 Chittagong Bangladesh 0.6121 624
Kuwait City Kuwait 0.8102 122 Libreville Gabon 0.6120 625
Adelaide Australia 0.8101 123 Xianning China 0.6119 626
Mecca Saudi Arabia 0.8097 124 Dandong China 0.6117 627
Honolulu U.S.A. 0.8078 125 Zhangjiakou China 0.6116 628
Brisbane Australia 0.8060 126 Rostov-on-Don Russian 0.6114 629
Dayton U.S.A. 0.8059 127 Fangchenggang China 0.6113 630
Lyon France 0.8058 128 Yan'an China 0.6113 631
Incheon Republic of Korea 0.8055 129 Celaya Mexico 0.6112 632
Valencia Spain 0.8055 130 Ciudad Guayana Venezuela 0.6109 633
Tampa-St. Petersburg U.S.A. 0.8052 131 Jiujiang China 0.6108 634
Pittsburgh U.S.A. 0.8052 132 Chengde China 0.6107 635
Kuala Lumpur Malaysia 0.8037 133 Villavicencio Colombia 0.6105 636
Knoxville U.S.A. 0.8033 134 Akure Nigeria 0.6101 637
Dalian China 0.8029 135 Nizhny Novgorod Russian 0.6097 638
Cincinnati U.S.A. 0.8016 136 Gaziantep Turkey 0.6091 639
Buffalo U.S.A. 0.8015 137 Chifeng China 0.6086 640
Columbia U.S.A. 0.8013 138 Chaoyang China 0.6085 641
Marseille-Aix-en-Provence France 0.8007 139 Novokuznetsk Russian 0.6083 642
Nanjing China 0.7996 140 Mexicali Mexico 0.6082 643
Detroit U.S.A. 0.7991 141 Neijiang China 0.6076 644
Gothenburg Sweden 0.7976 142 Acapulco Mexico 0.6069 645
Venice Italy 0.7965 143 Jinchang China 0.6065 646
Changsha China 0.7959 144 Harare Zimbabwe 0.6062 647
DubaiUnited Arab
Emirates0.7953 145 Linfen China 0.6061 648
Belfast U.K. 0.7926 146 Huaihua China 0.6054 649
Caracas Venezuela 0.7916 147 Denizli Turkey 0.6054 650
Ningbo China 0.7914 148 Kozhikode India 0.6054 651
Istanbul Turkey 0.7914 149 Bengbu China 0.6053 652
Ogden U.S.A. 0.7910 150 Luliang China 0.6053 653
Shizuoka-Hamamatsu
M.M.A.Japan 0.7908 151 Omsk Russian 0.6052 654
Naples Italy 0.7905 152 Baishan China 0.6051 655
Edmonton Canada 0.7903 153 Nanchong China 0.6050 656
Glasgow U.K. 0.7896 154 Malang Indonesia 0.6048 657
Akron U.S.A. 0.7895 155 Guangan China 0.6044 658
Cape Coral U.S.A. 0.7893 156 Hamadan Iran 0.6043 659
San Jose U.S.A. 0.7889 157 Abidjan Cote d'ivoire 0.6040 660
New Orleans U.S.A. 0.7888 158 Qinzhou China 0.6040 661
Phoenix-Mesa U.S.A. 0.7884 159 Enugu Nigeria 0.6038 662
Rio de Janeiro Brazil 0.7880 160 Aracaju Brazil 0.6035 663
Wuhan China 0.7878 161 Accra Ghana 0.6035 664
Liege Belgium 0.7871 162 Izhevsk Russian 0.6035 665
Lisbon Portugal 0.7868 163 Anqing China 0.6034 666
Abu DhabiUnited Arab
Emirates0.7865 164 Yuncheng China 0.6032 667
Montevideo Uruguay 0.7863 165 Morelia Mexico 0.6019 668
Zaragoza Spain 0.7863 166 Shymkent Kazakhstan 0.6019 669
Kumamoto Japan 0.7856 167 Loudi China 0.6015 670
Memphis U.S.A. 0.7851 168 Chelyabinsk Russian 0.6015 671
Muscat Oman 0.7848 169 Jinzhong China 0.6012 672
Jerusalem Israel 0.7838 170 Tampico Mexico 0.6010 673
Hangzhou China 0.7822 171 Xiaogan China 0.6007 674
Busan Republic of Korea 0.7814 172 Poza Rica Mexico 0.6007 675
Daejeon Republic of Korea 0.7810 173 Jos Nigeria 0.6006 676
Santiago de Chile U.S.A. 0.7803 174 Ibague Colombia 0.6006 677
Chengdu China 0.7802 175 Qitaihe China 0.6002 678
Grand Rapids U.S.A. 0.7798 176 Volgograd Russian 0.6002 679
Rochester U.S.A. 0.7787 177 Port-au-Prince Haiti 0.5997 680
Nice France 0.7777 178 Fuxin China 0.5997 681
Gwangju Republic of Korea 0.7775 179 Huangshan China 0.5994 682
Maracaibo Venezuela 0.7770 180 Krivoi Rog Ukraine 0.5992 683
Prague Czech Republic 0.7767 181 Maceio Brazil 0.5990 684
Toulouse France 0.7763 182 Damascus Syrian 0.5985 685
Omaha U.S.A. 0.7761 183 Vladivostok Russian 0.5984 686
Tripoli Libya 0.7760 184 Kingston Jamaica 0.5980 687
Auckland New Zealand 0.7758 185 Dehra Dun India 0.5971 688
Florence Italy 0.7757 186 Voronezh Russian 0.5970 689
Sheffield U.K. 0.7755 187 Oshogbo Nigeria 0.5970 690
Jundiai Brazil 0.7754 188 Can Tho Viet Nam 0.5968 691
Jakarta Indonesia 0.7742 189 Suining China 0.5962 692
Dongguan China 0.7742 190 Yichun(JX) China 0.5957 693
Verona Italy 0.7741 191 Port Said Egypt 0.5956 694
Saint Petersburg Russian 0.7732 192 Nanping China 0.5951 695
Bucuresti Romania 0.7724 193 Cebu Philippines 0.5945 696
Toulon France 0.7723 194 Bhiwandi India 0.5943 697
Yantai China 0.7720 195 Ji'an China 0.5940 698
Leicester U.K. 0.7716 196 Shangqiu China 0.5935 699
Bologna Italy 0.7714 197 Qujing China 0.5929 700
Nantes France 0.7713 198 ChisinauRepublic of
Moldova0.5929 701
Shenyang China 0.7706 199 La Paz Bolivia 0.5929 702
Kaohsiung China 0.7706 200 Yekaterinburg Russian 0.5926 703
San Antonio U.S.A. 0.7700 201 Tuxtla Gutierrez Mexico 0.5925 704
Niigata Japan 0.7699 202 Oaxaca Mexico 0.5923 705
Genoa Italy 0.7697 203 Natal Brazil 0.5912 706
Malaga Spain 0.7697 204 Chizhou China 0.5912 707
Daegu Republic of Korea 0.7693 205 Tongchuan China 0.5911 708
Nottingham U.K. 0.7692 206 Xuancheng China 0.5911 709
Torino Italy 0.7689 207 Mombasa Kenya 0.5906 710
San Juan Puerto Rico 0.7668 208 Huludao China 0.5904 711
Taichung China 0.7661 209 Shanwei China 0.5899 712
Changzhou China 0.7656 210 Chuzhou China 0.5895 713
Luanda Angola 0.7655 211 Davao Philippines 0.5895 714
Winnipeg Canada 0.7647 212 Fuzhou(JX) China 0.5893 715
Bordeaux France 0.7646 213 Jiamusi China 0.5893 716
Riverside-San Bernardino U.S.A. 0.7640 214 Rabat Morocco 0.5892 717
Maracay Venezuela 0.7626 215 Marrakech Morocco 0.5892 718
Tangshan China 0.7620 216 Ludhiana India 0.5884 719
Bangkok Thailand 0.7615 217 Kitwe Zambia 0.5878 720
Quebec Canada 0.7614 218 Puducherry India 0.5876 721
Lima Peru 0.7607 219 Managua Nicaragua 0.5875 722
jinan China 0.7594 220 Asmara Eritrea 0.5875 723
Dongying China 0.7593 221 Huanggang China 0.5872 724
Chongqing China 0.7592 222 Nagpur India 0.5872 725
Tokyo Japan 0.7585 223Thiruvananthapura
mIndia 0.5872 726
Valencia Spain 0.7583 224 Hulunbuir China 0.5871 727
Brasilia Brazil 0.7581 225 Kannur India 0.5869 728
Porto Alegre Brazil 0.7577 226 Fuyang China 0.5868 729
Bakersfield U.S.A. 0.7574 227 Haiphong Viet Nam 0.5865 730
Budapest Hungary 0.7568 228 Cucuta Colombia 0.5863 731
Hefei China 0.7567 229 Ulanqab China 0.5861 732
Baku Azerbaijan 0.7566 230 Chongzuo China 0.5858 733
Rosario Argentina 0.7563 231 Da Nang Viet Nam 0.5856 734
Tulsa U.S.A. 0.7562 232 Shuangyashan China 0.5855 735
Zhengzhou China 0.7560 233 Guigang China 0.5855 736
Mexico City Mexico 0.7558 234 Zunyi China 0.5854 737
Xiamen China 0.7556 235 Tangier Morocco 0.5852 738
Astana Kazakhstan 0.7551 236 Denpasar Indonesia 0.5849 739
Hsinchu China 0.7547 237 Ulan Bator Mongolia 0.5849 740
Bogota Colombia 0.7546 238 Tlaxcala Mexico 0.5845 741
Athens Greece 0.7544 239 Laibin China 0.5841 742
Tyumen Russian 0.7538 240 Orumiyeh Iran 0.5840 743
Dammam Saudi Arabia 0.7536 241 Hanzhong China 0.5839 744
Poznan Poland 0.7529 242 Yongzhou China 0.5838 745
Bremen Germany 0.7528 243 Bayannur China 0.5828 746
Campinas Brazil 0.7528 244 Konya Turkey 0.5828 747
Albany U.S.A. 0.7527 245 Liaoyuan China 0.5820 748
Sarasota-Bradenton U.S.A. 0.7520 246 Cagayan de Oro Philippines 0.5819 749
Warsaw Poland 0.7518 247 Kayseri Turkey 0.5817 750
Barcelona-Puerto La Cruz Venezuela 0.7509 248 Surat India 0.5816 751
Buraydah Saudi Arabia 0.7495 249 Rajshahi Bangladesh 0.5815 752
Samut Prakan Thailand 0.7490 250 Baicheng China 0.5813 753
Pretoria South Africa 0.7487 251 Chiclayo Peru 0.5808 754
Zhongshan China 0.7487 252 Suizhou China 0.5806 755
Zibo China 0.7478 253 Bozhou China 0.5801 756
Ahvaz Iran 0.7477 254 Meknes Morocco 0.5800 757
Catania Italy 0.7469 255 Rasht Iran 0.5795 758
Nantong China 0.7465 256 Esfahan Iran 0.5795 759
Daqing China 0.7450 257 Thrissur India 0.5791 760
Quanzhou China 0.7448 258 Ya'an China 0.5787 761
Karaj Iran 0.7441 259 Douala Cameroon 0.5786 762
Zhenjiang China 0.7434 260 Suzhou (AH) China 0.5785 763
Shaoxing China 0.7418 261 Visakhapatnam India 0.5778 764
Johannesburg South Africa 0.7398 262 Kota India 0.5773 765
Monterrey Mexico 0.7375 263 General Santos City Philippines 0.5772 766
Newcastle upon Tyne U.K. 0.7368 264 Diyarbakir Turkey 0.5770 767
Porto Portugal 0.7364 265 Suihua China 0.5761 768
Delhi India 0.7357 266 Ulyanovsk Russian 0.5761 769
Zhuhai China 0.7348 267 Qiqihar China 0.5757 770
Tainan China 0.7335 268 Tabuk Saudi Arabia 0.5756 771
Xuzhou China 0.7324 269 Madurai India 0.5756 772
Sacramento U.S.A. 0.7323 270 Asansol India 0.5754 773
Yangzhou China 0.7321 271 Ilorin Nigeria 0.5745 774
El Paso U.S.A. 0.7315 272 Liuan China 0.5743 775
Mendoza Argentina 0.7310 273 Onitsha Nigeria 0.5742 776
Panama City Panama 0.7309 274 Yunfu China 0.5739 777
Changchun China 0.7280 275 Bandar Lampung Indonesia 0.5738 778
SharjahUnited Arab
Emirates0.7279 276 Kirkuk Iraq 0.5737 779
Taizhou(JS) China 0.7276 277 Mangalore India 0.5733 780
Fuzhou(FJ) China 0.7273 278 Bogor Indonesia 0.5726 781
Sofia Bulgaria 0.7271 279 Eskisehir Turkey 0.5725 782
Santa Fe Argentina 0.7263 280 Durg-Bhilai Nagar India 0.5722 783
Thessaloniki Greece 0.7249 281 Meizhou China 0.5722 784
Oran Algeria 0.7240 282 Tiruppur India 0.5717 785
Tehran Iran 0.7237 283 Pointe-Noire Congo 0.5715 786
Portland U.S.A. 0.7227 284 Hegang China 0.5713 787
Nanchang China 0.7222 285 Guangyuan China 0.5711 788
Sao Jose dos Campos Brazil 0.7222 286 Lusaka Zambia 0.5709 789
Xi'an China 0.7217 287 Kaduna Nigeria 0.5709 790
Jiaxing China 0.7217 288 Jixi China 0.5708 791
Krakow Poland 0.7207 289 Basra Iraq 0.5704 792
Weihai China 0.7206 290 Donetsk Ukraine 0.5702 793
Johor Bahru Malaysia 0.7200 291 Mosul Iraq 0.5697 794
Greater Vitória Brazil 0.7196 292 Fes Morocco 0.5686 795
Lodz Poland 0.7191 293 Latakia Syrian 0.5685 796
Bari Italy 0.7189 294 Guwahati India 0.5684 797
Baotou China 0.7189 295 Karbala Iraq 0.5681 798
Padova Italy 0.7180 296 Makhachkala Russian 0.5674 799
Minsk Belarus 0.7178 297 Hezhou China 0.5669 800
Shijiazhuang China 0.7177 298 Xinzhou China 0.5668 801
Belo Horizonte Brazil 0.7177 299 Qom Iran 0.5660 802
Gebze Turkey 0.7161 300 Kabul Afghanistan 0.5656 803
Fresno U.S.A. 0.7150 301 Jalandhar India 0.5656 804
Palermo Italy 0.7148 302 Dakar Senegal 0.5651 805
Ashgabat Turkmenistan 0.7147 303 Amritsar India 0.5648 806
Ribeirao Preto Brazil 0.7145 304 Shaoyang China 0.5645 807
Albuquerque U.S.A. 0.7141 305 Tasikmalaya Indonesia 0.5641 808
Jining China 0.7129 306 Dar es Salaam Tanzania 0.5641 809
Anshan China 0.7126 307 Nouakchott Mauritania 0.5641 810
Mumbai India 0.7120 308 Heyuan China 0.5640 811
Surabaya Indonesia 0.7103 309 Baise China 0.5638 812
Villahermosa Mexico 0.7103 310 Rajkot India 0.5636 813
Wuhu China 0.7100 311 Kerman Iran 0.5623 814
Ordoss China 0.7100 312 Agadir Morocco 0.5622 815
Guadalajara Mexico 0.7099 313 Patna India 0.5621 816
Joinville Brazil 0.7085 314 Faisalabad Pakistan 0.5617 817
Zagreb Croatia 0.7085 315 Jaipur India 0.5616 818
Tucson U.S.A. 0.7075 316 Sana'a' Yemen 0.5612 819
Taizhou(ZJ) China 0.7070 317 Vellore India 0.5605 820
Almaty Kazakhstan 0.7062 318 Sanliurfa Turkey 0.5603 821
Zhoushan China 0.7053 319 Jodhpur India 0.5602 822
Amman Jordan 0.7052 320 Brazzaville Congo 0.5596 823
Panjin China 0.7046 321 Kumasi Ghana 0.5595 824
McAllen U.S.A. 0.7041 322 Kathmandu Nepal 0.5595 825
Curitiba Brazil 0.7035 323 Hamah Syrian 0.5594 826
Lagos Nigeria 0.7025 324 Zhangjiajie China 0.5591 827
Santo DomingoDominican
Republic0.7024 325 Safaqis Tunisia 0.5589 828
Cordoba Argentina 0.7022 326 Baiyin China 0.5588 829
Samarinda Indonesia 0.7017 327 Erode India 0.5587 830
Ipoh Malaysia 0.7016 328 Hyderabad India 0.5583 831
Weifang China 0.7015 329 Pingliang China 0.5579 832
Manila Philippines 0.7011 330 Salem India 0.5576 833
Havana Cuba 0.7009 331 Tiruchirappalli India 0.5573 834
Beirut Lebanon 0.7008 332 Anshun China 0.5571 835
Pekanbaru Indonesia 0.7001 333 Kinshasa Congo 0.5569 836
Be'er Sheva Israel 0.7001 334 Vijayawada India 0.5567 837
Ufa Russian 0.6997 335 Qingyang China 0.5565 838
Asuncion Paraguay 0.6986 336 Bahawalpur Pakistan 0.5560 839
Medellin Colombia 0.6973 337 Zhongwei China 0.5560 840
Hohhot China 0.6972 338 Nashik India 0.5560 841
Sorocaba Brazil 0.6969 339 Nasiriyah Iraq 0.5559 842
Recife Brazil 0.6961 340 Srinagar India 0.5554 843
Taiyuan China 0.6959 341 Meerut India 0.5554 844
Quito Ecuador 0.6951 342 WuZhong China 0.5553 845
Hufuf-Mubarraz Saudi Arabia 0.6950 343 Yerevan Armenia 0.5552 846
Leon Mexico 0.6943 344 Jambi Indonesia 0.5552 847
Guatemala City Guatemala 0.6936 345 Shangluo China 0.5551 848
Seville Spain 0.6929 346 Jamnagar India 0.5550 849
Harbin China 0.6922 347 Kolhapur India 0.5549 850
Bursa Turkey 0.6921 348 Santa Marta Colombia 0.5547 851
Mar Del Plata Argentina 0.6920 349 Lucknow India 0.5536 852
Rizhao China 0.6916 350 Vientiane Lao 0.5531 853
Tijuana Mexico 0.6915 351 Kermanshah Iran 0.5531 854
Ta'if Saudi Arabia 0.6905 352 Tirupati India 0.5530 855
Yingkou China 0.6903 353 Najaf Iraq 0.5527 856
Cape Town South Africa 0.6902 354 Aleppo Syrian 0.5525 857
Samara Russian 0.6894 355 Rawalpindi Pakistan 0.5522 858
Benghazi Libya 0.6893 356 Maiduguri Nigeria 0.5519 859
Wenzhou China 0.6882 357 Zamboanga Philippines 0.5517 860
Huizhou China 0.6882 358 Khulna Bangladesh 0.5514 861
Cali Colombia 0.6874 359 Bhubaneswar India 0.5509 862
Wuhai China 0.6873 360 Raurkela India 0.5507 863
Merida Mexico 0.6868 361 Cherthala India 0.5507 864
Izmir Turkey 0.6866 362 Sokoto Nigeria 0.5506 865
Yancheng China 0.6865 363 Ardabil Iran 0.5506 866
Nairobi Kenya 0.6865 364 Jamshedpur India 0.5504 867
San Luis Potosi Mexico 0.6863 365 Ankang China 0.5499 868
Yichang China 0.6858 366 Mysore India 0.5499 869
Bangalore India 0.6843 367 Bacolod Philippines 0.5497 870
Jinhua China 0.6843 368 Sylhet Bangladesh 0.5495 871
Valparaiso Chile 0.6841 369 Baoshan China 0.5492 872
Xuchang China 0.6833 370 Kharkov Ukraine 0.5488 873
Luoyang China 0.6833 371 Dnipropetrovs'k Ukraine 0.5485 874
Ankara Turkey 0.6823 372 Yazd Iran 0.5476 875
Perm Russian 0.6817 373 Islamabad Pakistan 0.5475 876
Binzhou China 0.6817 374 Jiuquan China 0.5465 877
Zhuzhou China 0.6811 375 Bazhong China 0.5462 878
Belgrade Serbia 0.6808 376 Siliguri India 0.5460 879
Xinyu China 0.6801 377 Durango Mexico 0.5459 880
Huzhou China 0.6798 378 Salta Argentina 0.5459 881
Dezhou China 0.6797 379 Kurnool India 0.5459 882
Baoding China 0.6794 380 Hechi China 0.5454 883
Balikpapan Indonesia 0.6791 381 Chandigarh India 0.5453 884
Taian China 0.6787 382 Rangoon Myanmar 0.5446 885
Cancun Mexico 0.6786 383 Aurangabad India 0.5445 886
Kunming China 0.6786 384 Lome Togo 0.5444 887
Jiangmen China 0.6785 385 Zaporizhzhya Ukraine 0.5440 888
Karamay China 0.6782 386 Gujranwala Pakistan 0.5440 889
Torreon Mexico 0.6766 387 Banjarmasin Indonesia 0.5425 890
Jilin China 0.6758 388 Warangal India 0.5423 891
Ma'anshan China 0.6753 389 Lincang China 0.5422 892
Nanning China 0.6749 390 Sekondi Ghana 0.5421 893
San Miguel de Tucuman Argentina 0.6748 391 Lvov Ukraine 0.5419 894
Durban South Africa 0.6743 392 Zhangye China 0.5418 895
Maturín Venezuela 0.6737 393 Wuwei China 0.5418 896
Benin City Nigeria 0.6734 394 Pontianak Indonesia 0.5413 897
Kiev Ukraine 0.6733 395 Vadodara India 0.5409 898
Riga Latvia 0.6732 396 Sangali India 0.5409 899
Algiers Algeria 0.6729 397 Hubli-Dharwad India 0.5408 900
Urumqi China 0.6727 398 Tianshui China 0.5407 901
Xiangyang China 0.6726 399 Odessa Ukraine 0.5405 902
Yaroslavl Russian 0.6725 400 Tashkent Uzbekistan 0.5399 903
Batam Indonesia 0.6717 401 Indore India 0.5394 904
Antalya Turkey 0.6699 402 Zhaotong China 0.5393 905
Londrina Brazil 0.6695 403 Nyala Sudan 0.5386 906
Adana Turkey 0.6694 404 Peshawar Pakistan 0.5383 907
Port Harcourt Nigeria 0.6691 405 Heihe China 0.5380 908
Wroclaw Poland 0.6688 406 Bien Hoa Viet Nam 0.5375 909
Lianyungang China 0.6685 407 Solapur India 0.5370 910
Chennai India 0.6681 408 Sialkot Pakistan 0.5370 911
Queretaro Mexico 0.6677 409 Ranchi India 0.5368 912
Huangshi China 0.6674 410 Yichun(HLJ) China 0.5364 913
Maoming China 0.6668 411 Gwalior India 0.5361 914
Matamoros Mexico 0.6668 412 Kigali Rwanda 0.5344 915
Manaus Brazil 0.6667 413 Al-Raqqa Syrian 0.5344 916
Misratah Libya 0.6663 414 Freetown Sierra Leone 0.5343 917
Toluca Mexico 0.6661 415 Guntur India 0.5342 918
Santiago de Los Caballeros U.S.A. 0.6661 416 Bhopal India 0.5340 919
Uberlandia Brazil 0.6657 417 Bokaro Steel City India 0.5332 920
Pingdingshan China 0.6656 418 Lubumbashi Congo 0.5329 921
Yulin(SX) China 0.6653 419 Saharanpur India 0.5329 922
Songyuan China 0.6652 420 Varanasi India 0.5322 923
Osaka Japan 0.6652 421 Sukkur Pakistan 0.5318 924
Zaozhuang China 0.6649 422 Kanpur India 0.5307 925
Goiania Brazil 0.6645 423 Agra India 0.5307 926
Putian China 0.6643 424 Kayamkulam India 0.5301 927
Zhaoqing China 0.6640 425 Bhavnagar India 0.5296 928
Tongling China 0.6639 426 Bulawayo Zimbabwe 0.5293 929
Guayaquil Ecuador 0.6631 427 Tirunelveli India 0.5282 930
Jiaozuo China 0.6628 428 Amravati India 0.5279 931
Cangzhou China 0.6625 429 Jammu India 0.5277 932
Dhaka Bangladesh 0.6624 430 homs Syrian 0.5272 933
Kuching Malaysia 0.6618 431 Pu'er China 0.5270 934
Huaian China 0.6610 432 Lijiang China 0.5268 935
Tolyatti Russian 0.6606 433 Bogra Bangladesh 0.5265 936
Fortaleza Brazil 0.6595 434 Guyuan China 0.5257 937
Qinhuangdao China 0.6592 435 Malegaon India 0.5254 938
Cairo Egypt 0.6591 436 Addis Ababa Ethiopia 0.5246 939
Puyang China 0.6581 437 Suez Egypt 0.5240 940
Baghdad Iraq 0.6578 438 Zahedan Iran 0.5232 941
Longyan China 0.6578 439 Dhanbad India 0.5232 942
Ezhou China 0.6578 440 Multan Pakistan 0.5231 943
Langfang China 0.6577 441 Cuttack India 0.5230 944
Erbil Iraq 0.6572 442 Namangan Uzbekistan 0.5228 945
Handan China 0.6568 443 Bareilly India 0.5224 946
Guiyang China 0.6564 444 Aden Yemen 0.5221 947
Jinzhou China 0.6563 445 Aligarh India 0.5219 948
Shuozhou China 0.6563 446 Longnan China 0.5213 949
Belem Brazil 0.6557 447 Nellore India 0.5210 950
Saratov Russian 0.6555 448 Belgaum India 0.5209 951
Saltillo Mexico 0.6555 449 Niamey Niger 0.5209 952
Concepcion Chile 0.6552 450 Allahabad India 0.5208 953
Cartagena Colombia 0.6549 451 Cotonou Benin 0.5205 954
Jieyang China 0.6548 452 Dingxi China 0.5203 955
Liaocheng China 0.6545 453 Muzaffarnagar India 0.5202 956
San Salvador El Salvador 0.6542 454 Moradabad India 0.5199 957
Yuxi China 0.6535 455 Yaounde Cameroon 0.5196 958
Juarez Mexico 0.6534 456 Jabalpur India 0.5180 959
Shantou China 0.6531 457 Bishkek Kyrgyzstan 0.5168 960
Fushun China 0.6530 458 Nnewi Nigeria 0.5164 961
Anyang China 0.6529 459 Ajmer India 0.5151 962
Bandung Indonesia 0.6527 460 Nanded Waghala India 0.5144 963
Haikou China 0.6525 461 Quetta Pakistan 0.5130 964
Lanzhou China 0.6521 462 Mwanza Tanzania 0.5126 965
Benxi China 0.6515 463 Zanzibar Tanzania 0.5124 966
Liaoyang China 0.6514 464 Gulbarga India 0.5118 967
Xiangtan China 0.6510 465 Ujjain India 0.5112 968
Zhangzhou China 0.6506 466 Durgapur India 0.5100 969
Owerri Nigeria 0.6500 467 Bamako Mali 0.5066 970
Sanming China 0.6499 468 Imphal India 0.5061 971
Yinchuan China 0.6498 469 Jhansi India 0.5055 972
Port Elizabeth South Africa 0.6493 470 Firozabad India 0.5048 973
Salvador Brazil 0.6491 471 Ouagadougou Burkina Faso 0.5047 974
Pingxiang China 0.6478 472 Mogadishu Somalia 0.5026 975
Grande Sao Luis Brazil 0.6477 473 Antananarivo Madagascar 0.5026 976
Linyi China 0.6475 474 Bikaner India 0.4990 977
Yueyang China 0.6472 475 Nay Pyi Taw Myanmar 0.4961 978
Barnaul Russian 0.6469 476 Conakry Guinea 0.4957 979
Colombo Sri Lanka 0.6461 477 Raipur India 0.4943 980
Suqian China 0.6460 478 Blantyre-Limbe Malawi 0.4941 981
Tunis Tunisia 0.6456 479 Bouake Cote d'ivoire 0.4914 982
Shiraz Iran 0.6450 480 Djibouti Djibouti 0.4910 983
Aba Nigeria 0.6446 481 Mandalay Myanmar 0.4887 984
Liuzhou China 0.6441 482 Maputo Mozambique 0.4885 985
La Plata Argentina 0.6439 483 Matola Mozambique 0.4879 986
Chenzhou China 0.6439 484 Mathura India 0.4878 987
Hebi China 0.6438 485 Sargodha Pakistan 0.4850 988
Zigong China 0.6437 486 Gorakhpur India 0.4850 989
Jiayuguan China 0.6436 487 Abomey-Calavi Benin 0.4847 990
Uyo Nigeria 0.6434 488 Hargeysa Somalia 0.4841 991
Krasnodar Russian 0.6434 489 Monrovia Liberia 0.4827 992
Luohe China 0.6430 490 Mbuji-Mayi Congo 0.4817 993
Tomsk Russian 0.6424 491 Taiz Yemen 0.4814 994
Semarang Indonesia 0.6424 492 Hodeidah Yemen 0.4755 995
Barquisimeto Venezuela 0.6420 493 N'Djamena Chad 0.4730 996
Reynosa Mexico 0.6419 494 Bobo Dioulasso Burkina Faso 0.4711 997
Samsun Turkey 0.6416 495 Lilongwe Malawi 0.4686 998
Arequipa Peru 0.6414 496 Bujumbura Burundi 0.4682 999
Ryazan Russian 0.6410 497 Dushanbe Tajikistan 0.4661 1000
Veracruz Mexico 0.6409 498 Kananga Congo 0.4620 1001
Aguascalientes Mexico 0.6409 499 Bangui Central African 0.4554 1002
Kazan Russian 0.6408 500 Tshikapa Congo 0.4475 1003
Quzhou China 0.6407 501 Bukavu Congo 0.4373 1004
Jingmen China 0.6406 502 Nampula Mozambique 0.4348 1005
Huaibei China 0.6399 503 Kisangani Congo 0.0000 1006
![Link to VoR: Angewandte Angew. Chem. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed ...liuyi-group.dlut.edu.cn/yjcg/28.2018-Angewandte_In... · [9a,9b] Second, microwave-assisted hydrothermal Figure 1. Schematic](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/5f926cbb573a2573600d1a2e/link-to-vor-angewandte-angew-chem-angew-chem-int-ed-liuyi-groupdluteducnyjcg282018-angewandtein.jpg)
![Abhishek Industries Annual Report 202008 9[1]](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/5526b48b5503462a6f8b4e7c/abhishek-industries-annual-report-202008-91.jpg)
![ECSS%202008 TR[1]](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/577dae2d1a28ab223f90144f/ecss202008-tr1.jpg)
