1
Group randomized, controlled evaluation of yoga for adolescent mental health within a high school curriculum Jessica J. Noggle & Sat Bir S. Khalsa, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School Background Yoga – a multi-component mind-body practice including: Physical postures Breathing exercises Relaxation techniques Meditation techniques Traditional goals – optimal physical, emotional and cognitive functioning; ultimately higher states of consciousness similar to other meditation techniques Modern application – to prevent/treat stress- related mental and physical ailments 1 Yoga reduces psychophysiological arousal in adults 2-4 Initial studies on youth suggest similar results, e.g. better mood & reduced stress, anxiety 5,6 ; need for: Randomized, controlled trials School setting to reach most youth In 2007, 2.1% youth <18 practicing yoga 7 Objective To evaluate feasibility & efficacy of yoga for adolescent mental health using a group randomized, controlled trial within a school curriculum Conclusions Yoga prevented deterioration of affect, anxiety & confusion over the semester relative to physical education For students attending yoga regularly, anger control was also maintained Kripalu yoga was feasible with older adolescents – 11 th & 12 th graders Suggestions for future studies: Larger sample size More balanced groups Younger adolescents Academic performance (grades) Cognitive behavioral testing More representative student body Acknowledgements Yoga teachers Janna Delgado & Iona Brigham, project leader Debbie Cohen, research & teaching assistants at Kripalu Monument Mountain Regional High School Funded by the Institute for Extraordinary Living, Kripalu Center for Yoga and Health Yoga Intervention 10-wk progressive program, 2 to 3 Kripalu yoga classes/wk lasting 30 to 40 min each ~25 yoga classes/student 2 senior Kripalu yoga instructors & 5 assistants 1 teacher + 1 assistant/class Key Kripalu yoga principles: – Self-inquiry Compassionate awareness Emotion regulation Each class consisted of: 5-min centering Including breathing techniques 5-min warm-up 15 to 25-min postures 5-min relaxation References 1 - Khalsa SBS, 2004 Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 48:269-85 2 - Jevning et al., 1992 Neurosci Biobehav Rev 16:415-24 3 - Ray et al., 2001 Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 45:37-53 4 - Pal et al., 2004 Indian J Med Res 120:115-21 5 - Galantino et al., 2008 Pediatr Phys Ther 20:66-80 6 - Birdee et al., 2009 Acad Pediatr 9:212-20 7 - Barnes et al., 2008 National Health Statistics Report 12:24pp Study Profile Do you think the yoga was valuable enough that you would recommend it to your friends? Average Visual Analog Score 0 20 40 60 80 100 Number of Subjects 0 5 10 15 20 Not at all Very much so Did you find that the yoga was helpful for you in general? Average Visual Analog Score 0 20 40 60 80 100 Number of Subjects 0 5 10 15 20 Not at all Very much so Acceptability Baseline End Program Average STAXI Score 20 21 22 23 24 25 Yoga Control p<0.05 Anger Control Yoga Control Average Difference Score -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 Total Mood Disturbance Tension-Anxiety Depression-Dejection Anger-Hostility Vigor-Activity Fatigue-Inertia Confusion-Bewilderment Improving Worsening * * * p<0.05 * * Mood Baseline End Program Baseline End Program Average PANAS-C Score 30 35 40 45 50 Control Control Yoga Yoga Positive Negative n.s. p<0.05 Affect 73% of students rated yoga as more than helpful for them in general (60 to 100 VAS) 31% of students gave highest rating (90-100 VAS) for recommending yoga to their friends Positive affect remained unchanged in both groups after one semester (ANCOVA controlling baseline) Negative affect worsened in controls while remaining stable in the yoga group Negative mood states improved in yoga group & worsened in control group (2 significant & 3 trends) Exceptions: Vigor-Activity & Fatigue-Inertia improved in both groups (trends) Ability to control expression of anger worsened in control group & remained stable in yoga group Students attending 25% or more yoga classes Eligibility 15 3 excluded 1 previous yoga 2 dropped PE 21 16 16 16 Enrollment 15 20 16 16 14 Random Cluster Allocation 15 20 16 16 14 Intervention 15 20 15 15 13 Analysis 15 58 3 dropped 1 medical leave 2 left study 5 attended <25% 5 PE class periods cluster randomized to: PE (yellow) Yoga (green) # students/class period in boxes

Group randomized, controlled evaluation of yoga for ... · Yoga Yoga Positive Negative n.s. p

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Group randomized, controlled evaluation of yoga for ... · Yoga Yoga Positive Negative n.s. p

Group randomized, controlled evaluation of yoga for adolescent mental health within a high school curriculum

Jessica J. Noggle & Sat Bir S. Khalsa, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School

Background• Yoga – a multi-component mind-body practice

including:– Physical postures– Breathing exercises– Relaxation techniques– Meditation techniques

• Traditional goals – optimal physical, emotional and cognitive functioning; ultimately higher states of consciousness similar to other meditation techniques

• Modern application – to prevent/treat stress-related mental and physical ailments1

• Yoga reduces psychophysiological arousal in adults2-4

• Initial studies on youth suggest similar results, e.g. better mood & reduced stress, anxiety5,6; need for: – Randomized, controlled trials– School setting to reach most youth

• In 2007, 2.1% youth <18 practicing yoga7

ObjectiveTo evaluate feasibility & efficacy of yoga

for adolescent mental health using a group randomized, controlled trial

within a school curriculum

Conclusions• Yoga prevented deterioration of affect, anxiety

& confusion over the semester relative to physical education

• For students attending yoga regularly, anger control was also maintained

• Kripalu yoga was feasible with older adolescents– 11th & 12th graders

• Suggestions for future studies:– Larger sample size– More balanced groups– Younger adolescents– Academic performance (grades)– Cognitive behavioral testing– More representative student body

Acknowledgements• Yoga teachers Janna Delgado & Iona Brigham, project

leader Debbie Cohen, research & teaching assistants at Kripalu

• Monument Mountain Regional High School• Funded by the Institute for Extraordinary Living, Kripalu

Center for Yoga and Health

Yoga Intervention• 10-wk progressive program, 2 to 3 Kripalu yoga

classes/wk lasting 30 to 40 min each– ~25 yoga classes/student

• 2 senior Kripalu yoga instructors & 5 assistants– 1 teacher + 1 assistant/class

• Key Kripalu yoga principles:– Self-inquiry– Compassionate awareness– Emotion regulation

• Each class consisted of: – 5-min centering

• Including breathing techniques– 5-min warm-up– 15 to 25-min postures– 5-min relaxation

References1 - Khalsa SBS, 2004 Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 48:269-852 - Jevning et al., 1992 Neurosci Biobehav Rev 16:415-243 - Ray et al., 2001 Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 45:37-534 - Pal et al., 2004 Indian J Med Res 120:115-215 - Galantino et al., 2008 Pediatr Phys Ther 20:66-806 - Birdee et al., 2009 Acad Pediatr 9:212-207 - Barnes et al., 2008 National Health Statistics Report

12:24pp

Study Profile

Do you think the yoga was valuable enoughthat you would recommend it to your friends?

Average Visual Analog Score0 20 40 60 80 100

Num

ber o

f Sub

ject

s

0

5

10

15

20

Notatall

Verymuch

so

Did you find that the yogawas helpful for you in general?

Average Visual Analog Score0 20 40 60 80 100

Num

ber o

f Sub

ject

s

0

5

10

15

20

Notatall

Verymuch

so

Acceptability

Baseline End Program

Ave

rage

STA

XI S

core

20

21

22

23

24

25

Yoga

Controlp<0.05

Anger Control

Yoga Control

Ave

rage

Diff

eren

ce S

core

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

Total Mood DisturbanceTension-AnxietyDepression-DejectionAnger-HostilityVigor-ActivityFatigue-InertiaConfusion-Bewilderment

Improving

Worsening

*

*

* p<0.05

*

*

Mood

Baseline End ProgramBaseline End Program

Ave

rage

PA

NA

S-C

Sco

re

30

35

40

45

50

Control

Control

Yoga

Yoga

Positive Negativen.s. p<0.05

Affect

• 73% of students rated yoga as more than helpful for them in general (60 to 100 VAS)

• 31% of students gave highest rating (90-100 VAS) for recommending yoga to their friends

• Positive affect remained unchanged in both groups after one semester (ANCOVA controlling baseline)

• Negative affect worsened in controls while remaining stable in the yoga group

• Negative mood states improved in yoga group & worsened in control group (2 significant & 3 trends)– Exceptions: Vigor-Activity & Fatigue-Inertia

improved in both groups (trends)

• Ability to control expression of anger worsened in control group & remained stable in yoga group

Studentsattending25% ormoreyoga

classes

5 not analyzed

Eligibility 15

3 excluded − 1 previous yoga− 2 dropped PE

21 16 16 16

Enrollment 15 20 16 16 14

RandomCluster

Allocation15 20 16 16 14

Intervention 15 20 15 15 13

Analysis 15 58

3 dropped − 1 medical leave− 2 left study

− 5 attended <25%

• 5 PE class periods cluster randomized to:

– PE (yellow)

– Yoga (green)

• # students/class period in boxes