Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Group Assessment Feedback: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
December 09
Roger EmeryAccalia Atkinson
The Good, the Bad, the Ugly.
The Good, the Bad, the Ugly.
A Word In Your Ear - 2009Group Assessment Feedback…
Group Assessment Feedback…
Group Assessment Feedback: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
December 09
Hello!
Solent’s Experience Methodology Aims Objectives
Group Feedback Paper Good Bad Ugly
Roger EmeryLearning Systems Developer
Accalia AtkinsonLecturer in Law
Group Assessment Feedback: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
December 09
The Good…Case Study 2
Built Environment Programme
Level 2
Higher National Group Project
Formative and Summative
Individual Feedback on Group Work
Group Assessment Feedback: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
December 09
The Good…Case Study 2
STAFF“you are giving far more detailed feedback than you could possibly do with written!...the quality of the feedback is impressive!”
Phil Brown on the group project:
Tutor ConcernsUniversity AcceptanceExternal Examiners
STUDENTS
“excellent means of saying what needs to be said. Written remarks can be misinterpreted – orals can not”
“as there was 9 minutes of feedback it was much more helpful than the usual few sentences we receive”
“great quality feedback, has certainly given me something to think about”
Student preference63% audio 9% written 28% no preference.
Group Assessment Feedback: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
December 09
The Good…Case Study 4
HND Law
Level 2
Alternative Dispute Resolution Group Presentation
Summative
Group Feedback on Group Work
Example of conversation:
Group Assessment Feedback: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
December 09
The Good…Case Study 4
STAFF
Saved time
“quality of feedback had definitely improved… it allowed for greater depth and clarity”
ACCALIA QUOTES???
Benefitted from being able to listen to the first and second marker
STUDENTS
“I feel that the two lecturers recording together helped incorporate both opinions to provide better overall guidance and feedback”
“Much easier to understand than written feedback, which is often hard to read. This is much clearer, giving the lecturers an opportunity to provide a detailed evaluation of our work”
Alex:Rich:
Group Assessment Feedback: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
December 09
The Bad…Case Study 3
BAFPT
Level 3
Personal Training for Special
Conditions
Formative
Client Interviews
STUDENTS
Distracting Background Noise”
STAFF
Groups too large
More training required
Other uses
Group Assessment Feedback: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
December 09
The Ugly
Secure DeliveryTo IndividualsTo Groups
Group Assessment Feedback: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
December 09
The Ugly
Group Assessment Feedback: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
December 09
Conclusion
Can be effective in the right group environment Modes of delivery are secure Students engagement measured by discussion for a Students liked it!Reasonably straightforward process provided support given Can be time saving over time (and with practice)Accepted by external examiners
Adopted across a variety of disciplines
Group Assessment Feedback: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
December 09
Thank You
Roger EmeryLearning Technology [email protected]
Accalia AtkinsonFaculty of Business, Sport and [email protected]
http://tinyurl.com/o2zjss
