Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    1/48

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    2/48

    Development of assessmentDevelopment of assessmentToolsTools

    }Assessment tools in the affectivedomain, in particular, those which are

    used to assess attitudes, interest,motivations, and self-efficacy, have

    been developed.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    3/48

    Development of assessmentDevelopment of assessmentToolsTools

    }Rating Scales

    }Sematic Differential technique}Self-report

    }Free response & opinionnaire methods

    }

    Simple projective techniques}Self-expression techniques

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    4/48

    Rating ScalesRating Scales

    } Is a device for recording observationeither quantitatively or qualitatively

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    5/48

    Types of Rating ScalesTypes of Rating Scales

    }Numerical Rating Scale

    }Descriptive Rating Scale}Graph line Rating Scale

    }Attitude Scale

    } Thurstone Scale

    } Likert Scale} Gutlman Scale

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    6/48

    Numerical Rating ScaleNumerical Rating Scale

    } Somewhat called a score card

    } Example:

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    7/48

    Descriptive Rating ScaleDescriptive Rating Scale

    } Presents a number of phrases descriptiveof varying degree of a trait or

    characteristic

    } Example:

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    8/48

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    9/48

    Attitude ScalesAttitude Scales

    } The student is presented with a statementor series of statement relating to feelings

    and emotions and is asked to take apositions on it ranging from a level ofagreement to a level of disagreement

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    10/48

    ThurstoneThurstone ScaleScale

    } Thurstone is considered the father ofattitude measurement.

    } He addressed the issue of how favorablean individual is with regard to a given

    issue.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    11/48

    ThurstoneThurstone ScaleScale

    }On the next slide is an example of a

    Thurstone scale of measurement

    }Example (from Thurstone, 1931):

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    12/48

    Directions. Put a check mark in theDirections. Put a check mark in the

    blank if you agree with the item.blank if you agree with the item.

    _____1. Blacks should be considered the lowest

    class of human beings. (scale value= 0.9)

    _____2. Blacks and whites must be kept apart in all

    social affairs where they might be taken asequals. (scale value= 3.2)

    _____3. I am not interested in how blacks ratesocially. (scale value= 7.9)

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    13/48

    Directions. Put a check mark in theDirections. Put a check mark in theblank if you agree with the item.blank if you agree with the item.

    _____4. A refusal to accept blacks is not based onany fact of nature, but on a prejudice which

    should be overcome. (scale value= 5.4)

    _____5. I believe that blacks deserve the same

    social privileges as whites. (scale value= 3.2)

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    14/48

    Method of summated rating orMethod of summated rating orLikertLikert scalescale

    }Rensis Likert- developed the

    method of summated ratings (orLikerts scale), which is still widelyused.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    15/48

    Method of summatedMethod of summatedrating orrating or LikertLikert scalescale

    }

    Likert-type attitude scales are quitereliable and valid instruments for themeasurement of attitude.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    16/48

    Method of summated rating orMethod of summated rating or

    LikertLikert scalescale

    }Likert Scales are derived as follows:

    } First, you pick individual items to include;

    } Second, you choose how to scale eachitem;

    } Third, you ask your target audience tomark each item; and

    } Fourth, you derive a targets score byadding the values that target identifiedon each item

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    17/48

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    18/48

    Method of summated

    Method of summatedrating orrating or LikertLikert scalescale

    } Example:

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    19/48

    GutlmanGutlman ScaleScale

    }Attitude should be measured bymultidimensional scales as offered to one-

    dimensional scales such as thoseThurstone and Likert Scales

    } Example:

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    20/48

    Sematic Differential techniqueSematic Differential technique(SD)(SD)

    } To assess an individuals reaction tospecific words, ideas or concepts in terms

    of ratings on bipolar scales defined withcontrasting adjectives at each end. Anexample of an SD scale is:

    Good Bad

    3 2 1 0 1 2 3

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    21/48

    GoodGood Bad Bad3 2 1 0 1 2 33 2 1 0 1 2 3

    }0 neutral

    }1 slightly

    }2 quite

    }3 extremely

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    22/48

    Semantic DifferentialSemantic DifferentialMethodologyMethodology

    } Bipolar adjective scales are simple,economical means for obtaining data on

    peoples reaction.

    } Ratings on bipolar adjectives scales tend

    to be correlated, and three basic

    dimensions of response account for mostof the co-variation in ratings.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    23/48

    Semantic DifferentialSemantic DifferentialMethodologyMethodology

    } Some adjectives scales are almost puremeasures of the EPA dimensions; for

    example, good-bad for Evaluation,powerful-powerless for Potency.

    } EPA measurements are appropriate when

    one is interested in affective responses.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    24/48

    Semantic DifferentialSemantic DifferentialMethodologyMethodology

    }

    The SD has been used as a measure ofattitude in a wide variety of projects.Osgood, et,al., (1957) report exploratorystudies in which the SD was used to assessattitude change as a result of mass media

    programs and as a result of messagesstructured in different ways.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    25/48

    SelfSelf--reportreport} The most common measurement tool in

    the effective domain.

    } Self-reports are also sometimes calledwritten reflections

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    26/48

    SelfSelf--reportreport

    } Is a type of survey, questionnaire, or poll inwhich respondents read the question and

    select a response by themselves w/oresearcher interference.

    } Example

    } Why I Like or Dislike Mathematics?

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    27/48

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    28/48

    DisadvantageDisadvantage}Results from self report questionnaires may

    differ from how other people perceive a

    person because the self report assessmentsonly measures the assessment takers' self

    perceptions. Other personality assessment

    tools, like behavior analyzing and inkblot

    testing, can help a person realize thedifferences between his own personality

    perceptions and others' perceptions.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    29/48

    Free Response and Opinionnaires

    Methods

    }What is Free Response?

    } Free response is a type of question used intests in education, workplace, andgovernment.

    }Most free response questions ask a requirethe test-taker to state a belief, opinion, or

    write a short essay and back it up withfacts, examples, or other evidence.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    30/48

    Free Response and Opinionnaires

    Methods

    }What is Free Response?

    }

    Free response questions generally testmore than straight knowledge and askfor a "big picture" type of response. Also,they usually allow the taker to choosean area in which they are familiar.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    31/48

    Free Response and Opinionnaires

    Methods

    }What is Free Response?

    }

    Supporters argue that this type ofquestion on tests is that it gives a betterindication of the competence andintelligence of the test taker than othermore standardized responses, which are

    claimed to often only measure test-taking ability.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    32/48

    Free Response and Opinionnaires

    Methods

    }What is Free Response?

    }

    However, critics charge that the qualityof a free response answer is oftendetermined more by ability with thelanguage in which it is given thancompetence or intelligence.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    33/48

    Free Response and Opinionnaires

    Methods}What is Free Response?

    } Example:

    } Choose two of the following areas and write awell-developed essay in which you analyze

    change over time and continuities on howtechnological advances affected the regions

    between 1914 and 1945:

    China

    United StatesRussia (Soviet Union)

    Middle East

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    34/48

    Free Response and Opinionnaires

    Methods

    }Opinionnaires

    } The opinionnaires are used to measurethe attitude and the belief of therespondents.

    }Opinionnaires are also a type ofinformation forms, also known as

    attitude scale.

    } The opinionnaires are devised with viewto probing into the minds of thepeople.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    35/48

    Free Response and Opinionnaires

    Methods

    }Opinionnaires

    }

    The researchers analyze the responsesand reach to a conclusion about thebeliefs or attitude pattern of therespondents. The expressed reactionsto a statement show their attitude

    towards the matter in the question.However, it is not always possible to getto the real feelings of the people merelyby what they say.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    36/48

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    37/48

    SimpleSimple PProjectiverojective TTechniquesechniques

    }Allow respondents to project their subjective or true opinions and beliefs onto

    other people or even objects. Therespondents real feelings are then inferredfrom what s/he says about others.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    38/48

    } are normally used during individual or

    small group interviews. They incorporate anumber of different research methods.

    Among the most commonly used are:

    }Word association test

    }Sentence completion test

    } Thematic apperception test (TAT)

    } Third-person techniques

    SimpleSimple PProjectiverojective TTechniquesechniques

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    39/48

    Simple ProjectiveSimple ProjectiveTechniquesTechniques

    }Word Association Test: An individual isgiven a clue or hint and asked to respond

    to the first thing that comes to mind. Theassociation can take the shape of apicture or a word.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    40/48

    Simple ProjectiveSimple ProjectiveTechniquesTechniques

    }Completion Test: In this the respondentsare asked to complete an incomplete

    sentence or story. The completion willreflect their attitude and state of mind.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    41/48

    Simple ProjectiveSimple ProjectiveTechniquesTechniques

    }Construction Test: This is more or less likecompletion test. They can give you a

    picture and you are asked to write a storyabout it. The initial structure is limited andnot detailed like the completion test.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    42/48

    Simple ProjectiveSimple ProjectiveTechniquesTechniques

    } Expression Techniques: In this the peopleare asked to express the feeling or

    attitude of other people.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    43/48

    Simple ProjectiveSimple ProjectiveTechniquesTechniques

    }Disadvantages of Projective Techniques

    }

    Highly trained interviewers and skilledinterpreters are needed.

    } Interpreters bias can be there.

    } It is a costly method.

    }

    The respondent selected may not berepresentative of the entire population.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    44/48

    Making use of AssessmentInformation

    }Activities which are designed to be assessedshould provide information about what

    further experience pupils need and whatthey need to practice, as well as what theycan do already.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    45/48

    Making use of Assessment

    Information} Ofsted recommends the following methods:

    } Providing feedback on aspects of learningthrough marking, questioning of individuals andplenary sessions;

    } Listening and responding to pupils, encouragingand, where appropriate, praising them;

    } Recognizing and handling misconceptions,

    building on pupils' responses and steering themtowards clearer understanding, for example, byhelping them to apply new learning to differentsituations;

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    46/48

    Making use of AssessmentInformation

    }Ofsted recommends the following methods:

    } Encouraging pupils to judge the success of theirown work and setting targets for improvement;

    } Regularly sharing information about pupils'needs and achievements with parents/careers;

    } Taking full account of the targets set out in

    individual education plans for pupils withspecial educational needs.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    47/48

    Making use of AssessmentInformation

    }More formally, assessment information mightalso be used to:

    } Plan the next stage of a class's work, taking

    account of the mix of ability within the class, andof the need to challenge all pupils to make

    progress;

    } Report on pupils' attainment and progress, using alist of simplified level statements as a bank of

    comments to guide pupils' learning.

  • 8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools

    48/48

    DevelopmentO

    f AssessmentDevelopmentO

    f AssessmentTools and Utilizing InformationTools and Utilizing Information

    } Leader:

    } Uphoff, Meizel

    }Members:

    } Bingcang, Rea

    } Esteban, Theresa

    } Manalo, Lawrenze

    } Raquepo, Philip