Upload
rhea-p-bingcang
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
1/48
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
2/48
Development of assessmentDevelopment of assessmentToolsTools
}Assessment tools in the affectivedomain, in particular, those which are
used to assess attitudes, interest,motivations, and self-efficacy, have
been developed.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
3/48
Development of assessmentDevelopment of assessmentToolsTools
}Rating Scales
}Sematic Differential technique}Self-report
}Free response & opinionnaire methods
}
Simple projective techniques}Self-expression techniques
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
4/48
Rating ScalesRating Scales
} Is a device for recording observationeither quantitatively or qualitatively
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
5/48
Types of Rating ScalesTypes of Rating Scales
}Numerical Rating Scale
}Descriptive Rating Scale}Graph line Rating Scale
}Attitude Scale
} Thurstone Scale
} Likert Scale} Gutlman Scale
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
6/48
Numerical Rating ScaleNumerical Rating Scale
} Somewhat called a score card
} Example:
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
7/48
Descriptive Rating ScaleDescriptive Rating Scale
} Presents a number of phrases descriptiveof varying degree of a trait or
characteristic
} Example:
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
8/48
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
9/48
Attitude ScalesAttitude Scales
} The student is presented with a statementor series of statement relating to feelings
and emotions and is asked to take apositions on it ranging from a level ofagreement to a level of disagreement
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
10/48
ThurstoneThurstone ScaleScale
} Thurstone is considered the father ofattitude measurement.
} He addressed the issue of how favorablean individual is with regard to a given
issue.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
11/48
ThurstoneThurstone ScaleScale
}On the next slide is an example of a
Thurstone scale of measurement
}Example (from Thurstone, 1931):
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
12/48
Directions. Put a check mark in theDirections. Put a check mark in the
blank if you agree with the item.blank if you agree with the item.
_____1. Blacks should be considered the lowest
class of human beings. (scale value= 0.9)
_____2. Blacks and whites must be kept apart in all
social affairs where they might be taken asequals. (scale value= 3.2)
_____3. I am not interested in how blacks ratesocially. (scale value= 7.9)
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
13/48
Directions. Put a check mark in theDirections. Put a check mark in theblank if you agree with the item.blank if you agree with the item.
_____4. A refusal to accept blacks is not based onany fact of nature, but on a prejudice which
should be overcome. (scale value= 5.4)
_____5. I believe that blacks deserve the same
social privileges as whites. (scale value= 3.2)
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
14/48
Method of summated rating orMethod of summated rating orLikertLikert scalescale
}Rensis Likert- developed the
method of summated ratings (orLikerts scale), which is still widelyused.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
15/48
Method of summatedMethod of summatedrating orrating or LikertLikert scalescale
}
Likert-type attitude scales are quitereliable and valid instruments for themeasurement of attitude.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
16/48
Method of summated rating orMethod of summated rating or
LikertLikert scalescale
}Likert Scales are derived as follows:
} First, you pick individual items to include;
} Second, you choose how to scale eachitem;
} Third, you ask your target audience tomark each item; and
} Fourth, you derive a targets score byadding the values that target identifiedon each item
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
17/48
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
18/48
Method of summated
Method of summatedrating orrating or LikertLikert scalescale
} Example:
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
19/48
GutlmanGutlman ScaleScale
}Attitude should be measured bymultidimensional scales as offered to one-
dimensional scales such as thoseThurstone and Likert Scales
} Example:
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
20/48
Sematic Differential techniqueSematic Differential technique(SD)(SD)
} To assess an individuals reaction tospecific words, ideas or concepts in terms
of ratings on bipolar scales defined withcontrasting adjectives at each end. Anexample of an SD scale is:
Good Bad
3 2 1 0 1 2 3
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
21/48
GoodGood Bad Bad3 2 1 0 1 2 33 2 1 0 1 2 3
}0 neutral
}1 slightly
}2 quite
}3 extremely
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
22/48
Semantic DifferentialSemantic DifferentialMethodologyMethodology
} Bipolar adjective scales are simple,economical means for obtaining data on
peoples reaction.
} Ratings on bipolar adjectives scales tend
to be correlated, and three basic
dimensions of response account for mostof the co-variation in ratings.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
23/48
Semantic DifferentialSemantic DifferentialMethodologyMethodology
} Some adjectives scales are almost puremeasures of the EPA dimensions; for
example, good-bad for Evaluation,powerful-powerless for Potency.
} EPA measurements are appropriate when
one is interested in affective responses.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
24/48
Semantic DifferentialSemantic DifferentialMethodologyMethodology
}
The SD has been used as a measure ofattitude in a wide variety of projects.Osgood, et,al., (1957) report exploratorystudies in which the SD was used to assessattitude change as a result of mass media
programs and as a result of messagesstructured in different ways.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
25/48
SelfSelf--reportreport} The most common measurement tool in
the effective domain.
} Self-reports are also sometimes calledwritten reflections
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
26/48
SelfSelf--reportreport
} Is a type of survey, questionnaire, or poll inwhich respondents read the question and
select a response by themselves w/oresearcher interference.
} Example
} Why I Like or Dislike Mathematics?
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
27/48
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
28/48
DisadvantageDisadvantage}Results from self report questionnaires may
differ from how other people perceive a
person because the self report assessmentsonly measures the assessment takers' self
perceptions. Other personality assessment
tools, like behavior analyzing and inkblot
testing, can help a person realize thedifferences between his own personality
perceptions and others' perceptions.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
29/48
Free Response and Opinionnaires
Methods
}What is Free Response?
} Free response is a type of question used intests in education, workplace, andgovernment.
}Most free response questions ask a requirethe test-taker to state a belief, opinion, or
write a short essay and back it up withfacts, examples, or other evidence.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
30/48
Free Response and Opinionnaires
Methods
}What is Free Response?
}
Free response questions generally testmore than straight knowledge and askfor a "big picture" type of response. Also,they usually allow the taker to choosean area in which they are familiar.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
31/48
Free Response and Opinionnaires
Methods
}What is Free Response?
}
Supporters argue that this type ofquestion on tests is that it gives a betterindication of the competence andintelligence of the test taker than othermore standardized responses, which are
claimed to often only measure test-taking ability.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
32/48
Free Response and Opinionnaires
Methods
}What is Free Response?
}
However, critics charge that the qualityof a free response answer is oftendetermined more by ability with thelanguage in which it is given thancompetence or intelligence.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
33/48
Free Response and Opinionnaires
Methods}What is Free Response?
} Example:
} Choose two of the following areas and write awell-developed essay in which you analyze
change over time and continuities on howtechnological advances affected the regions
between 1914 and 1945:
China
United StatesRussia (Soviet Union)
Middle East
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
34/48
Free Response and Opinionnaires
Methods
}Opinionnaires
} The opinionnaires are used to measurethe attitude and the belief of therespondents.
}Opinionnaires are also a type ofinformation forms, also known as
attitude scale.
} The opinionnaires are devised with viewto probing into the minds of thepeople.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
35/48
Free Response and Opinionnaires
Methods
}Opinionnaires
}
The researchers analyze the responsesand reach to a conclusion about thebeliefs or attitude pattern of therespondents. The expressed reactionsto a statement show their attitude
towards the matter in the question.However, it is not always possible to getto the real feelings of the people merelyby what they say.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
36/48
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
37/48
SimpleSimple PProjectiverojective TTechniquesechniques
}Allow respondents to project their subjective or true opinions and beliefs onto
other people or even objects. Therespondents real feelings are then inferredfrom what s/he says about others.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
38/48
} are normally used during individual or
small group interviews. They incorporate anumber of different research methods.
Among the most commonly used are:
}Word association test
}Sentence completion test
} Thematic apperception test (TAT)
} Third-person techniques
SimpleSimple PProjectiverojective TTechniquesechniques
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
39/48
Simple ProjectiveSimple ProjectiveTechniquesTechniques
}Word Association Test: An individual isgiven a clue or hint and asked to respond
to the first thing that comes to mind. Theassociation can take the shape of apicture or a word.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
40/48
Simple ProjectiveSimple ProjectiveTechniquesTechniques
}Completion Test: In this the respondentsare asked to complete an incomplete
sentence or story. The completion willreflect their attitude and state of mind.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
41/48
Simple ProjectiveSimple ProjectiveTechniquesTechniques
}Construction Test: This is more or less likecompletion test. They can give you a
picture and you are asked to write a storyabout it. The initial structure is limited andnot detailed like the completion test.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
42/48
Simple ProjectiveSimple ProjectiveTechniquesTechniques
} Expression Techniques: In this the peopleare asked to express the feeling or
attitude of other people.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
43/48
Simple ProjectiveSimple ProjectiveTechniquesTechniques
}Disadvantages of Projective Techniques
}
Highly trained interviewers and skilledinterpreters are needed.
} Interpreters bias can be there.
} It is a costly method.
}
The respondent selected may not berepresentative of the entire population.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
44/48
Making use of AssessmentInformation
}Activities which are designed to be assessedshould provide information about what
further experience pupils need and whatthey need to practice, as well as what theycan do already.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
45/48
Making use of Assessment
Information} Ofsted recommends the following methods:
} Providing feedback on aspects of learningthrough marking, questioning of individuals andplenary sessions;
} Listening and responding to pupils, encouragingand, where appropriate, praising them;
} Recognizing and handling misconceptions,
building on pupils' responses and steering themtowards clearer understanding, for example, byhelping them to apply new learning to differentsituations;
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
46/48
Making use of AssessmentInformation
}Ofsted recommends the following methods:
} Encouraging pupils to judge the success of theirown work and setting targets for improvement;
} Regularly sharing information about pupils'needs and achievements with parents/careers;
} Taking full account of the targets set out in
individual education plans for pupils withspecial educational needs.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
47/48
Making use of AssessmentInformation
}More formally, assessment information mightalso be used to:
} Plan the next stage of a class's work, taking
account of the mix of ability within the class, andof the need to challenge all pupils to make
progress;
} Report on pupils' attainment and progress, using alist of simplified level statements as a bank of
comments to guide pupils' learning.
8/3/2019 Group 5-Development of Assessment Tools
48/48
DevelopmentO
f AssessmentDevelopmentO
f AssessmentTools and Utilizing InformationTools and Utilizing Information
} Leader:
} Uphoff, Meizel
}Members:
} Bingcang, Rea
} Esteban, Theresa
} Manalo, Lawrenze
} Raquepo, Philip