Group 37 Take Home Quiz

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Group 37 Take Home Quiz

    1/6

    School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering

    Division of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Plant Safety Take Home Quiz

    -Page | 1

    Nanyang Technological University

    SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING

    Division of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering

    CH 4101 Chemical, Biological and Plant Safety

    Take Home Quiz

    Name: : Amanda Oh U1120828

    Goh Jun Xian U1121414A

    Lim Jun Jie U1121458C

    Liu Jia Wei U1121611C

    Ng Yi Jun U1122180G

    Group: 37

  • 8/10/2019 Group 37 Take Home Quiz

    2/6

    School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering

    Division of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Plant Safety Take Home Quiz

    -Page | 2

    (a)Calculate the mass discharge rate of ETO for the following release incidents:

    (i) The pipeline is sheared off completely very close to T501

    Assumptions:

    Pipeline is sheared off at orifice

    Orifice is well-rounded, hence C0= 1

    Temperature and vapour does not change when passing through orifice

    Pipeline is at ground level

    Raw Data:

    Ratio of heat capacities,

    at 566 R

    Conversion factor, gc= 32.174 lbm-ft/lbf-sec2

    Ideal gas constant, Rg = 1545 ft lbf R-1

    lb-mol-1

    Molar mass of ETO, M = 44.05 lb/lb-mol

    Upstream temperature, T0= 566 R

    Upstream pressure, P0= 20 psia

    Ambient pressure, P = 14.7 psia

    Calculation:

    To determine whether flow through the orifice is choked or not, we use equation 4-49

    Hence flow is not choked.

  • 8/10/2019 Group 37 Take Home Quiz

    3/6

    School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering

    Division of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Plant Safety Take Home Quiz

    -Page | 3

    We then use equation 4-48 to calculate the mass discharge rate of ETO for a non-choked

    pipe:

    (ii) The pipeline is sheared off completely at the position of valve V503 while C502 is

    operating.

    Assumptions:

    Since the fluid path length through the release is greater than 10 cm(through a pipe),

    equilibrium flashing conditions are achieved and the flow is choked.

    Pressure of liquid (200psia) is greater than the saturation vapor pressure(25psia).

    At T501: At C502 discharge:

    To determine whether flow through the orifice is choked or not, we use equation 4-49

  • 8/10/2019 Group 37 Take Home Quiz

    4/6

    School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering

    Division of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Plant Safety Take Home Quiz

    -Page | 4

    Hence flow is choked.

    At C502 discharge, the density and viscosity are obtained from the graphs provided

    (b)For the larger of the two discharge rates in part (a) and a 1-hour incident time, what is

    the maximum downwind distance from the release point at which a potential life-

    threatening hazardous condition could exist at ground level for wind-weather

    conditions corresponding to 1.5m/s and stability class F?

    Assumptions:

    Pipe is at ground level, z = 0

    Wind is one-directional, y = 0

    Continuous release of material from pipe, hence gas release is in plume form

    Assume heat of vapourisation does not change over the temperature range

    Raw data:

    Wind speed, u = 1.5 m/s

    Depressurized boiling temperature, Tb= 283.8 K

    Upstream temperature, T0= 358.9 K

    Standard molar heat capacity of ETO, Cp = 48.19 J/(mol.K)

    Heat of vapourisation, Hv= 23671.13 J/mol

  • 8/10/2019 Group 37 Take Home Quiz

    5/6

    School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering

    Division of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Plant Safety Take Home Quiz

    -Page | 5

    Pasquill-Gifford stability

    classy(m) z(m)

    Rural conditions

    F 0.04x(1 + 0.0001x)

    -1/2

    0.016x(1 + 0.0003x)

    -1

    Urban Conditions

    E-F 0.11x(1 + 0.0004x)-1/2

    0.08x(1 + 0.0015x)-1/2

    Table 1. Values of Sigma at different conditions

    To determine the life-threatening hazardous concentration, we refer to the emergency

    response planning guidelines (ERPG).

    Classification of ERPG:

    ERPG-1 is the maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed nearly allindividuals could be exposed for up to 1 hr without experiencing effects other than

    mild transient adverse health effects or perceiving a clearly defined objectionable

    odor.

    ERPG-2 is the maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed nearly all

    individuals could be exposed for up to 1 hr without experiencing or developing

    irreversible or other serious health effects or symptoms that could impair their

    abilities to take protective action.

    ERPG-3 is the maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed nearly allindividuals could be exposed for up to 1 hr without experiencing or developing life-

    threatening health effects

    Chemical ERPG-1 ERPG-2 ERPG-3

    Ethylene oxide NA 50 ppm 500 ppm

    Table 2. Different ERPG values of ethylene oxide

    We determine ERPG-3 to be the life-threatening hazardous condition and hence the

    concentration is 500 ppm.

    Concentration, = 500 ppm = 915 mg/m3

    Amount of liquid vapourised,

  • 8/10/2019 Group 37 Take Home Quiz

    6/6

    School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering

    Division of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Plant Safety Take Home Quiz

    -Page | 6

    We use equation 5-48 to calculate for plume with continuous steady-state source at ground

    level and wind moving in x direction at constant velocity u.

    For rural condition,

    Using excel solver, x = 11.02 km for rural conditions.

    For urban condition,

    Using excel solver, x = 1.927 km for urban conditions.