Group 10 - Sport Obermeyer

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/24/2019 Group 10 - Sport Obermeyer

    1/5

    Case Analysis

    Sport Obermeyer

    Group 10

    Reg No. Student Name

    M005-14 ABHISHEK GUPTA

    M122-14 SHAHZEB FEROZ

    M024-14 CHETAN SEHGAL

    M007-14 ABHISHEK SAHU

    M084-14 AZFER SAJJAD

    M032-14 KAUSTAV PAL

    M006-14 ABHISHEK PRAVEEN

    M085-14 BALIBOYANA SRIHARSHA

  • 7/24/2019 Group 10 - Sport Obermeyer

    2/5

    A1) Production Units for different Style (Hong Kong):

    Taking the benchmark of 0.2 for the coefficient of Variance. In the cases where the COV is

    below 0.2 is considered to be a low risk item.

    For low risk items 80 % of the order can be given in the 1stphase itself while for high risk items

    only 20% of the order should be made rest 80% can be order after the Vegas show when there

    is high certainty.

    Now when the order quantity falls below 600 it has be scaled up to 600 since that is the

    minimum order size for Hong Kong.

    A2) Risk Measures associated with Ordering Policy:

    In case of the ordering policy of Sports Obeymeyer there is an associated risk attached to it

    which has its root from the following reasons:

    Stock outs (-24 % whole sale price)wherein the demand is more than the stock and

    hence lost sales takes place

    Market downs( -8% of wholesale price)- wherein the demand is less than the stock and

    hence overstocking loss takes place

    Old designs- since these are fashion based product once the design is old no sales takes

    place and hence the risk of old stock exists

    High inventory holding costif higher inventory exist to cater the demand there always

    exist an inventory holding cost risk associated with it

    Unable to fully profit from hit productsthere are times wherein due to stock out of a

    hit product one cannot fully profit from the hit productsAll these risk occur because of the uncertainty in the forecast of demand

    Demand

    Standa

    rdSde

  • 7/24/2019 Group 10 - Sport Obermeyer

    3/5

    We can assess the forecast certainty as follows:

    1. Based on historical data such as past forecast error and variability of demand

    2. The coefficient of variation which is standard deviation / mean is a good estimator of forecast

    reliability

    Form the table we can see that Stephanic has higher risk whereas Assault has the lower risk so

    according to this we can go in for planning the production.

    A3) Difference between production commitments in China & Hong Kong:

    The comparison of operations in China and Hong Kong brings out the following points:

    i) The plants in China are not as fast as Hong Kong in ramping up the production.

    ii) The Chinese workers were not trained to do a broader range of tasks as compared

    to workers in Hong Kong.

    iii) The minimum production quantity in China was twice as compared to Hong Kong

    for a particular unit (1200 units in China vs 600 units in Hong Kong)

    iv) The output/worker was higher in Hong Kong compared to China.

    As a result of this the production commitments required to be made to China would

    definitely consist of twice the number of units. For these reasons it is better to produce only

    those SKUs in China for which the forecasts are more accurate so that the economies of

    scope can be realized by ordering larger quantities.

    Taking the benchmark of 0.4 for the coefficient of Variance. In the cases where the COV is

    below 0.2 is considered to be a low risk item. For low risk items 80 % of the order can be given

    in the 1stphase itself while for high risk items only 20% of the order should be made rest 80%

    can be order after the Vegas show when there is high certainty. Now when the order quantity

    falls below 1200 it has be scaled up to 1200 since that is the minimum order size for Hong

    Kong.

  • 7/24/2019 Group 10 - Sport Obermeyer

    4/5

    A4) Operational changes to improve performance:

    Some of the operational issues which Sport Obermayer faces at the moment are:

    Difficulty in forecasting demand due to variability in fashion preferences and also

    because of a wide product line with a large number of SKUs

    Sourcing, i.e. allocation of production between the Hong Kong and China plants. While

    the China plant is more suited to large scale production orders, it is inefficient in terms

    of handling a wide variety of products

    Large lead times for manufacturing by sub contractors. Given the variability in forecasts

    with lack of sales data, early production orders to sub contractors because of the large

    lead times is a source of major risk as it can lead to over or under stocking of different

    product varieties.

    Logistics is another challenge for Sport Obermayer as the company has to provide

    matching products well ahead of the season which not only put pressure on the

    production process but also on the logistics process as well.

    In lieu of these operational challenges, the following changes are proposed to improve the

    operational performance of Sport Obermayer

    The company should consider reducing the variety in its product line especially in the

    Adult Segment. The product-process matrix for the adult segment is inefficient.

    Columbia Sportswear with a high volume -low cost approach has proven to be a lot

    more successful as compared to Sport Obermayer. Reducing the product line in the

    adult segment would significantly ease the forecasting process.

    The company should allocate the high volume-low cost product lines to the China plant

    which due to easier forecasting can be done considerably early and allocate the

    production of the other varied products primarily to the Hong Kong plant which is more

    skilled and more efficient in term of speed of production. Thus the production order to

    the Hong Kong plant can be delayed (the Hong Kong plant operates almost twice as

    efficient as the China plant) and the order can be based on the updated forecast which

    incorporates additional sales data.

    In terms of managing the lead times of the suppliers, the company should in the longrun consider vertical integration especially into finished shell and lining fabric which

    has very long lead times. The company should ideally attempt to open a plant in China

    where the labour costs are low and these operations do not require considerable skill

    levels. This can significantly reduce the lead times as the company can now control the

    process. Decreased lead times imply additional time availability for delayed production

    based on a more well informed forecasting process.

  • 7/24/2019 Group 10 - Sport Obermeyer

    5/5

    A5) Sourcing Policy

    Short-term Operational Changes

    The maximum production of 20,000 set by Wally should be increased. For example, because

    there is a maximum of 21,000 available units for the production period (3,000 production

    capacity x 7 months), extra quantity of Gail could be produced without having to cut into

    production of other styles. This would be preferable because sourcing Gail from China would

    require 813 more units to be produced than what is forecasted to be sold. However the cost

    savings of producing them in China outweigh the cost of selling the extra at an 8% loss. For

    our recommendations, Gail was produced in Hong Kong in order to adhere to Wallys 20,000

    maximum production guidelines. In reality, the company produces about 200,000 parkas

    yearly and has production capacity of 210,000 parkas; therefore, it is more cost efficient to

    overproduce from China in cases such as Gail.

    Long-term Operational Changes

    Train Chinese employees to increase production in China as labour is cheaper in China and

    they so accept large orders.