Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Friday, 17 O
cto
ber 2008
Groundwater & Sustainable Development
Tools for Predicting Levels of Impact
Angelo
Papaio
annou
Slid
e 2
GW Level Contours &
Delineation of Capture Zones
Slid
e 3
Distribution of
European Features in
Relation to
Groundwater
Capture/Outflow
Zones
Slid
e 4
Zonal Drought Min. Flows & Total Lic. Q
uantities
Slid
e 5
Potential Risks and Level of Confidence in the Assessm
ent
Slid
e 6
Conclusion of Stage 2 for the NNC site
•The w
hole
site w
ill p
rogre
ss to S
tage 3
(A
ppro
priate
Assessm
ent)
•For th
e tw
o Z
ones c
onsid
ere
d to b
e a
t Very
Low
(or le
sser) R
isk n
o further
assessm
ent is
required. T
his
inclu
des:
–Zone 4
(W
ells
West Bank (part o
f H
olk
ham
NN
R))
Due to insignificant levels of abstraction.
–Zone 6
(W
are
ham
to S
tiffkey
Salt M
ars
hes)
Due to the absence of any significant freshwater pathway.
•For all
oth
er Zones, at Low
(or hig
her) R
isk, w
ithin
the s
ite
Sta
ge 3
enta
ils m
ore
Investigations a
nd A
ssessm
ents
Slid
e 7
Coverage
1.Evolution of Groundwater Licensing in England, W
ales & Scotland.
2.Principles of Groundwater Quantity Managem
ent.
3.Assessing Groundwater Im
pacts & Sustainable Yield.
4.Principles for Risk Based (Screening) Assessments.
5.Case Example –North Norfolk Coast (Stage 2 -Review
of Consents).
Slides
3-5
6-9
10-1
3
14-1
6
17-2
5
Slid
e 8
Key Legislative Drivers in England & Wales
EPA90
WIA
92
LGA58
CO
PA74
HR94
CR
OW
A00
S&FFA23
RBA48
RPPA51
CR
(E)6
0S&FFA75
W&C
A81
EA95
WFDR03
◄
◄ ◄ ◄
◄
◄
◄◄◄
◄◄
WA45
WA58
WRA63
WA73
WA89
WR
A91
WA03
☻ ◘
☻
◘
◘
■ ☻
Water Acts
Other Acts or SIs
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
Slid
e 9
GW Licensing/Managem
ent Trends in E & W
EPA90
WIA
92
LGA58
CO
PA74
HR94
CR
OW
A00
S&FFA23
RBA48
RPPA51
CR
(E)6
0S&FFA75
W&C
A81
EA95
WFDR03
◄
◄ ◄ ◄
◄
◄
◄◄◄
◄◄
WA45
WA58
WRA63
WA73
WA89
WR
A91
WA03
☻ ◘
☻
◘
◘
■ ☻
Special PWS Status
Local Derogation
Water Acts
Other Acts or SIs
Groundwater Licensing
∫ Catchment Managem
ent
Env. Allocation/Protection
Exemptions
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
Slid
e 1
0
Groundwater Licensing in Scotland
1.
Restric
ted to few
sele
ctive &
sig
nific
antly a
quifers
prior to
WEW
S/C
AR
.
2.
Wate
r Environm
ent & W
ate
r Serv
ices (Scotland) Act –
2003 (W
EW
S)
primary legislation enactm
ent for the W
ater Framework Directive.
3.
Wate
r Environm
ent (C
ontrolle
d A
ctivitie
s) (S
cotland) R
egs. –
2005 (C
AR
)
CAR (along with 2007 Amendment) now includes water environment
activities including Groundwater Abstractions which came in to effect in
April 2006.
4.
Inclu
des G
enera
l Bin
din
g R
ule
s p
lus 3
Tie
rs o
f Lic
ensin
g (tw
o o
fw
hic
h
exte
nded to d
rilling &
testing p
hases o
f new
abstraction d
evelo
pm
ent).
5.
SEPA/S
NIF
FER
have d
evelo
ped e
xte
nsiv
e g
uid
ance (som
e s
till
ongoin
g) fo
r
gro
undw
ate
r in
vestigation &
managem
ent and s
om
e a
re refe
rred to late
r.
Slid
e 1
1
Groundwater Quantity Managem
ent
Groundwater
Managem
ent
Local
Derogation
Catchment
Sustainability
Environmental
Standards
Regulatory
Policy
Monitor
Investigate
Hydrogeological
Conceptualisation
Baseline
or Natural
Regime
Impacted
Regime
Slid
e 1
2
S-P-R Local Derogation Conceptualisation
Aquifer
Dra
wdow
n
Gro
undw
ate
r
Abstraction
Aquifer
Chara
cte
ristics
Rip
arian,
Soilw
ate
r &
Geote
ch. R
egim
e
Gro
undw
ate
r
Abstracto
rs
Wetland S
ites
SurfaceW
ate
r
Abstracto
rs
SurfaceW
ate
r
Environm
ent
Arh
aeolo
gic
al
Herita
ge
Gro
und
Sta
bility
Source/Pressure
←←
←←
←←
←←
←←
←←
←←Pathway/Links→
→→
→→
→→
→→
→→
→→
→Receptor/Effects
Springflow
s
Soil M
ois
ture
for Agriculture
Land
Dessic
ation
Gro
undw
ate
r
Quality
Inte
rcept
Gro
undw
ate
r
flow
Slid
e 1
3
Sustainable GW Abstraction Regime
Y
NN
YY
N
Total
Groundwater
Abstraction
>
f(Recharge)
Cause Env.
Dam
age?
Feasible
Mitigation?
Unsustainable
Reduce GW
Abstraction
Sustainable Regime
Slid
e 1
4
Sustainable GW Abstraction Managem
ent
Y
1 A
quifer R
egim
eN
N2 E
nv. D
ependance o
n G
W
3 E
nv. Sensitiv
ity/Im
portance
YY
1 M
in. C
ontrols
2 A
LF
3 A
SR
4 C
onju
nctive D
ev
N
Mitigation
Key Factors
Total
Groundwater
Abstraction
>
f(Recharge)
Cause Env.
Dam
age?
Feasible
Mitigation?
Unsustainable
Reduce GW
Abstraction
Sustainable Regime
Slid
e 1
5
Predicting Im
pacts & Sustainable Yield
1.Simple Approaches
2.Catchment Based
Analytical
Assessments
3.Distributed
Groundwater Modelling
�Recharge Estimation
�Water Balance Assessments
�Analytical Drawdown Estimation
�Estimating Stream
-flow Reduction
�GW Resource Sustainable Yield/Management
�EA Resource Assessm
ent & Managem
ent (RAM)
Framew
ork
Slid
e 1
6
Simple/Analytical Approaches
1.Recharge Estimation/Routing
2.Water Balance Assessments
3.Analytical Drawdown Estimation
a.Borehole/Well Abstractions
b.Dew
atering Abstractions
4.Estimating Stream
-flow Reduction
5.GW Resource Sustainable
Yield/Management
6.EA Resource Assessm
ent &
Management (RAM) Framew
ork
�MOSES/MORECS (+ routing factors)
�EA R&D Technical Report W6-057/TR
�http://www.sniffer.org.uk/results.asp
(see WFD12 & WFD31)
�Rainfall routing to runoff and recharge for regional
groundwater resource models QJEGH 37, 113 –130
•EA RAM Framew
ork (R&D W6-066M)
�EA Science Report SC040020/SR2
�Aquifer Win32 User Manual (ESI)
�EA Science Report SC040020/SR1
�EA (R&D W6-046M)
IGARF2
�EA (R&D W6/i544/7)SPRW6-I544-7-E-E
�JoH–Vol202 (1997), The Use of Aquifer Response Rate in the
Assessment of GW Resources
�http://www.sniffer.org.uk/results.asp
(see WFD53)
�EA RAM Framew
ork (R&D W6-066M)
�http://www.sniffer.org.uk/results.asp
(see WFD48 which draws
upon the RAM framew
ork as a key WFD indicator)
QminBF= R *
f(SY*L
E**2/TE)
Slid
e 1
7
Distributed Groundwater Modelling
1.Generic
2.MODFLOW
3.MIKE-SHE
4.Many Others!
�EA R&D W213 Guidance-Briefing (GEHO0505BJEN-E-E)
�EA R&D W214 (Technical Report)
Slid
e 1
8
Hydro-ecological Prescriptions
•http://www.english-nature.org.uk/lifeinukrivers/summary/summary.html
for in-river Natura2000 species
•http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/search.asp?cx=010476233810196394646%3Aj3joeevl72k&q
=eco-hydrological+guidelines&sa=Search&cof=FORID%3A11#662
for; Lowland Wetland Plants; alluvial forest and bog woodlands; bog restoration -Peatland
Ecosystems; basin fens; & dune habitats.
•http://www.snh.org.uk/publications/samples/naturalHeritageM
anagem
ent/bogssam
ples.asp
for OmbrotrophicMires (Bog Habitats)
•http://publications.environment-
agency.gov.uk/epages/eapublications.storefront/46fcbcbc00229ffa273fc0a8029606e7/Product
/View/GEAN0205BIPZ&2DE&2DE
for Eco-hydrological Guidelines for Lowland Wetland Plant Communities
•http://publications.environment-
agency.gov.uk/epages/eapublications.storefront/46fcbcbc00229ffa273fc0a8029606e7/Search/
Run
for various wetland/hydrology publications
•http://www.sniffer.org.uk/results.asp
for imminent publications; WFD35 Wetland Framew
ork; WFD84 Groundwater Classification
Framew
ork; & WFD83 Freshwater Flows to Transitional Waters.
Slid
e 1
9
Risk Based Screening Assessm
ents
Conceptualisation
Slid
e 2
0
Fresh Groundwater Inflow to
Thornham‘Salt’Marsh
Freshwater Lagoon -HolmeNNR
Slid
e 2
1
High
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
Medium
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
Low
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
VERY LOW
Very Low
LOW
VERY LOW
LOW
LOW
NEGLIGIBLE
Negligible
NEGLIGIBLE
NEGLIGIBLE
NEGLIGIBLE
NEGLIGIBLE
NEGLIGIBLE
Medium
Low
High
Certain
Very Low
Assigning Overall Risk
Magnitude of Potential Effect
Likelihood of Occurrence
Slid
e 2
2
Level of Confidence
High
Medium
Low
Low
Very Low
Medium
High
Negligible
Risk
Managing Uncertainty
Slid
e 2
3
Case Example
Stage 2 –Review of Consents
for the North Norfolk Coast
SAC/SPA/Ramsar
under the Habitats Regulations/Directive
Slid
e 2
4
Hydrological Regime of North Norfolk Coast
Slid
e 2
5
NNC Designations/Characteristics
Designations
•SSSI
•North Norfolk Coast cSAC
•Wash and North Norfolk Coast cSAC
•North Norfolk Coast SPA
•Ram
sarSite
What is different about this site?
�It occupies 40km of coastline (between Hunstanton
and Weybridge)
�It includes a full spectrum of transitional habitats
from marine to reclaimed freshwater marsh
�It includes both distinct estuarine and groundwater
freshened inter-tidal (salt marsh and tidal creek)
habitats
Therefore, the approach to assessment is tailored to
suit the hydro-ecological regime. The flow regime
(gw& river) is critical and level regimes are of
secondary significance in terms of risk.
The flow regime is critical in terms of:
–freshening/flushing
–abating saline intrusion