198
ACTIVITY IN CASE 2:12-CV-02997-MCE-DAD GRINOLS ET AL V. ELECTORAL COLLEGE ET AL MINUTE ORDER Inbox x [email protected] 12:41 PM (1 hour ago) to CourtMail This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Eastern District of California – Live System Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 12/20/2012 at 12:40:04 PM PST and filed on 12/20/2012 Case Name: Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al Case Number: 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Filer: Document Number: 13 (No document attached) Docket Text: AMENDED MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Chief District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court’s own motion, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [12] is set for hearing on January 3, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7. Oppositions are to be filed not later than December 26, 2012 and a reply, if any, by December 28, 2012. Plaintiffs’ counsel is ordered to give notice of this minute order to Defendants by 4:00 p.m., December 20, 2012. (Deutsch, S) Modified on 12/20/2012 (Deutsch, S). 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to: Orly Taitz [email protected], [email protected] 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to: The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: This is a re-generated NEF. Created on 12/20/2012 at 12:41 PM PST

Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Legal filings concerning a lawsuit against the Electoral College to stop confirmation of vote for Obama for President because of massive identity fraud crimes by Obama.

Citation preview

Page 1: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

ACTIVITY IN CASE 2:12-CV-02997-MCE-DAD GRINOLS ET AL V. ELECTORAL COLLEGE ET AL MINUTE ORDER Inbox x

[email protected]

12:41 PM (1 hour ago)

to CourtMail

This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access

fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.

U.S. District Court

Eastern District of California – Live System

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered on 12/20/2012 at 12:40:04 PM PST and filed on 12/20/2012

Case Name: Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al

Case Number: 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD

Filer:

Document Number: 13 (No document attached)

Docket Text: AMENDED MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Chief District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court’s own motion, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [12] is set for hearing on January 3, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7. Oppositions are to be filed not later than December 26, 2012 and a reply, if any, by December 28, 2012. Plaintiffs’ counsel is ordered to give notice of this minute order to Defendants by 4:00 p.m., December 20, 2012. (Deutsch, S) Modified on 12/20/2012 (Deutsch, S).

2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Orly Taitz [email protected], [email protected]

2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to: The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:

This is a re-generated NEF. Created on 12/20/2012 at 12:41 PM PST

Page 2: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Case ?'.L2-cv-A2997-MCE-DAD Document 7 Frled LZl13l12 Paoe t of 2UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRTCT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES GRINOLS, ET AL. ,

V.

ELECTORAL COLLEGE, ET AL.,

ISSUED as to days afterservice of this sufiunons on you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by

default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. Any answer that you serve

on the parties to this action must be filed with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable period

of time after service.

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE

CASE NO: 2 : 12-CV -02997'MCE-DAI)

TO:Defendant's Address: Cnroc/ /{,'etera [6&*? c?

4t-/- |

VICTORIA C. MINORCLERK

/s/ A. Meuleman

ISSUED ON 2012-12-13 08:34:31.0, ClerkUSDC EDCA(By) DEPUTY CLERK

Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 11 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 5

Page 3: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

case 2:L2--.-v{!p97-reEaaq -Dpqur-ert-"7_ Eiled rzrlst].} paqe L at ZUNITED STATES DISTRICT COUiiT'-' ' gVU T V '

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES GRINOLS, ET AL. ,

V.

ELECTORAL COLLEGE, ET AL. ,

TO:Defendant's Address:

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE

CASE NO: 2 : 12-CV -02997 -MCE-DAD

(/pL{S (r^f'{€t)

Lt'S fr H"r*'so/ Ttf, A

6rr..r^*J,, {' c/+/- 2- (2 c-)

-z t{/7YOU ARE IIEREBY SUMMONED and reqgirefl to serve on f,h- t/#{ -.,1, **.,G. ny'dS , ,4.ofn f: O.L{:e o , 2o'(l*Z1a{"r- fr/gcs/7 {ia /+,*-'--yfia;

^'o'i"-" lAc ( / rr...2 /G-rt J.r/./with answbr to complainl due within .- - ,

- /

Ac;;.';ffi; p-/Z 6,6/-?f ,? { r'1"'v*,i *"/oc:;/a-o &- fa*"d,. fi;;'"'/'

c4 ?2(3/an answer to the complaint which is served on you with this summons, within . (Meuleman, A)SUMMONSISSUED as to days afterservice of this summons on you? exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment bydefault will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. Any answer that you serveon the parties to this action must be filed with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable periodof time after service.

VICTORIA C. MINORCLERK

/s/ A. Meuleman

ISSUED ON 2012-12-13 08:34:31.0, ClerkUSDC EDCA(By) DEPUTY CLERK

Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 11 Filed 12/18/12 Page 2 of 5

Page 4: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Case 2:L2_:_c:t-923{:$4gFeAD^ *D_oqryqept_L Fjted LZttBtI2 paoe 1, at 2UNITED STATES DTSTRICT COUFTT --EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES GRINOLS, ET AL. ,

V.

ELECTORAL COLLEGE, ET AL. ,

SUMMONS IN A CIVI CASE

CASE NO: 2:12-CV -02997-MCE-DAI)

service of this surnmons on you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment bydefault will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. Alry answer that you serveon the parties to this action must be filed with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable periodof time after service.

VICTORIA C. MINORCLERK

isl A. Meuleman

ISSUED ON 2012-12-13 08:34:31.0, ClerkUSDC EDCA

(By) DEPUTY CLERK

Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 11 Filed 12/18/12 Page 3 of 5

Page 5: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

vqJL L.LL-VV-\JZ-;V r -tvl\/

RE,TURN OF SERVICEService of the Summons and complaint was made by m",r) IDA* l; I ii' I t-> 17-*o* o,

"r*uu* rr**rl c/ /u fr ,,

Check one box below to indicate appropriate method of seruice

Served personally upon the defendant. Place where served:

Left copies thereof at the defendant's dwelling house or usual place ofbode with a person of suitable age anddiscretion then residing therein.

Name of person with whom the summons and complaint were left:

Retumed unexecuted:

STATEMENT OF SER\TICE FEESrrevel lsgnvrcrs Tffiffivsn i

-I declare under penalty of pe{ury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information

Executed on/Lt['

Date

't'N 3? '5"P ' tI /':'i'{'};'-'''{?Aditresi ofServer

; /e fii.-) .4

f,* ,. tI:',, Scr . /'' r(" {)'it /r/'' ,/'t ( ;') ( &' C'L /-1

Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 11 Filed 12/18/12 Page 4 of 5

Page 6: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Hl(. tl{fsft.rgrExpress U; AfUil

Fed&Irackins 801,5 qg10 ?bee

1 lfim Ptease pddand prcshard.

9a2 Your lntemal Billing Re{ercnce

Fd24 chacdsE wll appear on inrcice.

Delt/Floor,Suib/Room

4 Express Package Service .romrdmNoTE: Seilice oder has chaqed. Please seledcaretully.

Packages4htp&tuwowfrl

ffiEp@fr

reT@ENn FedEx2DavAM.Ll Secondbu$nejsmominsl

Stuft y Deliwv NoT available.

n FedFx2DavL--l Second busineis sfromoon.*ftuEdayshipm

illl be d€lirered0n Mondayunls$SruRDAYDslturyiss€leftd.

n FedExExoressSaverL-.1 ftnd busines dar'

SaturdaV Deliv€ry N0T available.

n FedExFirst0verniohtL--.1 Eadi€snMbudnesmofiinqdeluerybseled

locdoffi. ftidayshipme6dll be ddtured onMondov unl€$ SATUBDAY Dsltury is s€left d.

rf r-ldEx Prioritv overn io htLlI n* tusines moririnq.* Hdsishipme6 ilrl be

ddtusrcd on Mondayunle$ $ruRDAY Ddirery

1 FedEx Standard 0vernightL I Nsnbusinsss ftmoon.*

Smday Ddtuv Nfr awilsue.

5 Paekaging .Dmhdwrmridso.

L/

l\.,,1'FedEx Envelope* | FedEx Pak* f l FedEx -

FedEx! Bo* u Tube

o"" /,1 /{- lo O- ',ii"Y"#!ilh", '

omc?co@IoO

UEoIoC,oaEoqxo)E'(D {r; f -T t{-

I A//on3To

Recipient'sName

6 SpecialHandlingandDeliverySignaturc0ptions

T-l SATIJRDAYDeliveruL---.1 iloT awilatle lor Fed& $dndad 0vemistt Fed& Day AM., or tudk kpress S6ver

- NoSignatureRequired,[-lr..tsignrtur. -N'J"t"?JflfljLXgL l Pacbsemryhlffiffiod l:l Sonsons€tccipisdsaddrc$ | laddresqmmeone*r

.mrnm, a sqmtu€Dr.€N.ry' mar son Dr.sru€ry ruPa #,11:*:li[ilfl]g:

Docs lhis shipment contain dangemus gmds?one hox must he checked.* / _-;;; --'--- _-,*[y'o tr3g]i;:psr***"" tr $[ft;,,",9;*,*" E Pfl"19,9u^,*u

Danlom$0oo&lincludimdryice)canndbeshippsdintukpacbsing ! CargoAirCraft0nltr placed in a ted& &prN Drcp Bu

7 P4ymem arzra;I

-

awane

#+$:l** il,*,T "'"E H,Tf -il,;; r

hdBAcdNo. EqHTMM, D6

TotalPackags ToblWeight TotslDeclaredValuet

lbs. $ .m

iou liabiliry is hmhed bUsslmunlesspudeclae a highervalue. See bsckhrdMils. ByudnghisAdillFuagrebhesMcecoddomonhebackdhsA6illandrnSecumfl todhSeMceGude.includingbmffd [mn our lhbility.

fieu D.t€ 1/12. Pad*16ru2.@012 F6d&. Pfl INTED lN U S A SBF

D€plfroorAufrqfrmm

H0tD WeekdayFedklocdon addreas

T--] BE0U|RED ilfr aEilshlo hru feduhduwrntarc

H0LD Saturdayhdk lmdnn rddlN

- RmuFm_Ml#oilLYtor

L-l todePidivowmhmsdkdkDrybsledhcdns";Y;Hr""""

,o*

Address

E

Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 11 Filed 12/18/12 Page 5 of 5

Page 7: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Phone 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

[email protected]

Counselor for the Plaintiffs

US District Court

For the Eastern District of California

James Grinols, Robert Odden, in their capacity )Case # 12-cv-02997

as Presidential Electors )MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

Edward C. Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, ) RESTRAINING ORDER

Keith Judd in their capacity as )

candidates for the U.S. President )

v Electoral College, President of the Senate, )

Governor of California, Secretary of State )

of California, U.S. Congress )

)

)

)

INTRODUCTION

Page 8: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Plaintiffs bring this action as Presidential Electors and as candidates for U.S.

President, who, having been deprived of lawful process in the statewide election

for the national office of U.S. President held in California on November 6, 2012, as

a direct and proximate result of the mispersonation and elections fraud perpetrated

by defendant Obama, seek redress from this court to enjoin:

1. Secretary of State and Governor from certifying the Certificate of Ascertainment

due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the citizen of Indonesia

Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama

Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position of the Commander

in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged long form birth

certificate, forged Selective Service certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social

Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office

2. The Electoral College from tallying their votes due to lack of legitimacy for

office and fraud committed by the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka

Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for

the U.S. Presidency and position of the commander in-Chief, while using a forged

short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective

Service certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425

as a proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office

Page 9: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

3. governor of CA from forwarding the Certificate of Electoral Vote to the US

Congress due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the citizen

of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack

(Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position of

the commander in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged

long form birth certificate, forged selective Service certificate and a stolen

Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and

fitness for office

4. President of the Senate from presenting the Certificates of the Electoral Vote to

the U.S. Congress due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the

citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka

Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and

position of the commander in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth

certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective Service certificate

and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his

legitimacy and fitness for office

Page 10: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

5. U.S. Congress from confirming the elections results due to lack of legitimacy for

office and fraud committed by the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka

Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for

the U.S. Presidency and position of the commander in-Chief, while using a forged

short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective

Service certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425

as a proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office

6. Defendant Barack Hussein Obama from taking the oath of office as a U.S.

President on the inauguration day due to his lack of legitimacy for office and fraud

committed by him, as the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack

(Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S.

Presidency and position of the Commander in-Chief, while using a forged short

form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective Service

certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a

proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office.

Plaintiffs, who are Presidential electors and Presidential candidates have standing

to raise these claims as directly interested parties. These claims are justiciable, and

as this court has one last opportunity to act, the claims are not moot. Jacobs v.

Clark County Sch. Dist., 526 F.3d 419, 425 (9th Cir. 2008). Plaintiffs incorporate

Page 11: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

herein the complaint and petition for injunctive relief filed herein on 12.12.2012

and exhibits pp1-107 to aforementioned complaint and petition for injunctive relief

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiffs incorporate herein the complaint and petition for injunctive relief filed

herein on 12.12.2012 and exhibits pp1-107 to aforementioned complaint and

petition for injunctive relief.

Defendant Obama is not qualified for the office of U.S. President, as he is a

citizen of Indonesia operating under an alias.

Defendant Obama is using a forged birth certificate to validate his claim of

an American birth. In proffering false documents in order to obtain a federal

position, Defendant Obama (in this case, the Presidency) has violated 18 USC §

911 (falsely representing that he is a US citizen); and 18 USC § 1001 (June 25,

1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13,

1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–292, § 2, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3459; Pub. L.

108–458, title VI, § 6703(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766; Pub. L. 109–248, title I,

§ 141(c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 603.) in falsifying his identity as a member of the

executive branch of the federal government.

Page 12: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Defendant Obama is using a forged Selective Service Certificate to

demonstrate his claim of a lawful registration for the draft, when no such

registration occurred. In proffering a falsified draft registration, Defendant

Obama has violated 18 USC § 1001, and is further disqualified from holding any

position within the Executive branch of the United States government pursuant to

5 USC § 3328.

/ / /

Defendant Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number which was

never assigned to him as a proof of his identity. In proffering a false social security

number, Defendant Obama, is in criminal violation of 42 USC § 408, which

provides as follows:

(a) In general

Whoever - (6) willfully, knowingly, and with intent to deceive the

Commissioner of Social Security as to his true identity (or the true identity

of any other person) furnishes or causes to be furnished false information

to the Commissioner of Social Security with respect to any information

required by the Commissioner of Social Security in connection with the

establishment and maintenance of the records provided for in section

Page 13: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

405(c)(2) of this title; shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction

thereof shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned for not more than five

years, or both.

Defendant Obama is not a natural born citizen and is ineligible to hold the

office of the Presidency, pursuant to Article II, Section 1, clause 5, which states

that “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at

the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of

President.”

The crimes are egregious violations which vitiated the ability of the

plaintiffs in this case to lawful process in the furtherance of the November 6, 2012

election.

In addition, the November 6, 2012 election in California was marked with

substantial voter fraud. Over one and a half million invalid voter registrations in

California have been discovered, in violation of elections statute 2150. 756,213

records were without a birth place, 685,739 records where instead of a required

name of the state of birth, U.S. or U.S.A was entered, there were as many as

141,851 possible duplicate records, 130,019 records with birth date over 100, 757

records without a birth date, and 898 records without a first name. (Exhibit 11,

Page 14: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

12). Employees of the Registrar's office from Orange County and Los Angeles

County have admitted in e-malls to falsification of voter data by entering date

1900, when they found no date, and entering USA or US when the name of the

state of birth is missing. (Exhibit 19). The number of registered voters in

California went up by over a million since the last Presidential election in 2008

and most of the increase came from on line registration.

EVIDENCE UPON WHICH PLAINTIFFS RELY

Plaintiffs rely on the following evidence, all of which has been provided to

this court:

1. Certificate of Nomination for Edward C. Noonan as candidate for the

office of President; (Ex. 1).

2. Affidavit of Michael Zullo; (Ex. 2).

3. Affidavit of Douglas B. Vogt; (Ex. 3).

4. Affidavit of Timothy Lee Adams; (Ex. 4).

5. Affidavit of Felicito Papa; (Ex. 5).

6. Affidavit of Felicito Papa; (Ex. 6).

7. Affidavit of Linda Jordan; (Ex. 7).

8. Affidavit of Dr. Ronald J. Polland; (Ex. 8).

Page 15: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

9. Affidavit of John N. Sampson; (Ex. 9).

10. Social Security Number Verification System report; (Ex. 10).

11. Affidavit of David Yun; (Ex. 11).

12. Affidavit of David Yun; (Ex. 12).

13. Registration of Barry Soetoro in Indonesia; (Ex. 13).

14. Declaration of Christopher-Earl Strunk; (Ex. 14).

15. Affidavit of Susan Daniels; (Ex. 15).

16. Official Report of the National Assembly of Kenya, Mar. 25, 2010; (Ex.

16).

17. Report: The Vetting – Exclusive – Obama’s Literary Agent in 1991

Booklet: ‘Born in Kenya and Raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.’ (Ex. 17).

18. Affidavit of Maricopa County Sheriff, Joseph M. Arpaio; (Ex. 18).

19. Emails: Public Records LA County; (Ex. 19).

20. Certificate of Live Birth (Hawaiian exemplar); (Ex. 20).

21. Certificate of Live Birth of Defendant Obama (White House file); (Ex. 21).

POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

The United States Supreme Court revisited the requirements for obtaining a

preliminary injunction in Winter v. NRDC, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008). "A plaintiff

seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the

Page 16: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

merits; that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary

relief; that the balance of equities tips in his favor; and that an injunction is in the

public interest."

There is a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the case.

A candidate for office is presumed to hold the qualifications to seek and

hold that office, unless and until a party proves to a court of competent

jurisdiction that the candidate is not qualified. Dumas v. Gagner, 137 Wn.2d 268,

285, 971 P.2d 17 (1999). The burden of demonstrating that Obama is not eligible

to hold the office of the Presidency is on plaintiffs. Baldwin v. Sisters of

Providence, 112 Wn.2d 127, 135, 769 P.2d 298 (1989); see also Ankeny v.

Governor of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678, 681 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). Plaintiffs rely

exclusively on the fact record contained herein; namely the Birth Certificate of

Barack Hussein Obama (Ex. 21) as posted on the White House website, and

expressly adopted by Obama.

Here is the official statement from the White House website:

In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. The state sent the campaign the President’s birth certificate, the same legal documentation provided to all Hawaiians as proof of birth in state, and the campaign immediately posted it on the internet.

Page 17: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

When any citizen born in Hawaii requests their birth certificate, they receive exactly what the President received. In fact, the document posted on the campaign website is what Hawaiians use to get a driver’s license from the state and the document recognized by the Federal Government and the courts for all legal purposes. That’s because it is the birth certificate. This is not and should not be an open question.

The President believed the distraction over his birth certificate wasn’t good for the country. It may have been good politics and good TV, but it was bad for the American people and distracting from the many challenges we face as a country. Therefore, the President directed his counsel to review the legal authority for seeking access to the long form certificate and to request on that basis that the Hawaii State Department of Health make an exception to release a copy of his long form birth certificate. They granted that exception in part because of the tremendous volume of requests they had been getting.

Here is the comment of Barack Hussein Obama concerning the release of

this Birth Certificate:

We've posted the certification that is given by the state of Hawaii on

the Internet for everybody to see. Transcript of President’s remarks

following the release of the long form Birth Certificate, The White House,

Office of the Press Secretary, April 27, 2011 at 9:48 a.m. PDT.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/remarks-

president.

Federal Rules of Evidence, 804(3) provides for the admissibility of this

evidence, and plaintiff submits that judicial notice should be taken thereof:

Page 18: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

(3) Statement Against Interest. A statement that:

(A) a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have made only if the person believed it to be true because, when made, it was so contrary to the declarant’s proprietary or pecuniary interest or had so great a tendency to invalidate the declarant’s claim against someone else or to expose the declarant to civil or criminal liability; and

(B) is supported by corroborating circumstances that clearly indicate its trustworthiness, if it is offered in a criminal case as one that tends to expose the declarant to criminal liability.

Because Plaintiffs have granted standing to bring this charge, and because

the issue is justiciable in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

California, (see Marbury v Madison, op. cit.), this court must therefore consider

the law regarding the precondition of facts as admitted by Barack Hussein Obama

and consider whether he is actually able to hold the office of the Presidency.

a. Standing

Article III standing means an injury in fact that is fairly traceable to the

challenged conduct and has some likelihood of redressability. Fleck and Assocs.,

Inc. v. City of Phoenix, 471 F.3d 1100, 1103-04 (9th Cir. 2006). Lujan v. Defenders

of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 556-61, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). The

Supreme Court has also recognized third-party standing in cases involving jury

composition. See, e.g., Campbell v. Louisiana, 523 U.S. 392, 397-400 (1998)

(allowing a litigant to raise a claim on behalf of third parties where (1) the litigant

Page 19: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

has suffered an “injury in fact”; (2) he has a “close relationship” to the third

parties; and (3) there is some hindrance to the third parties asserting their own

rights); Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 410-15 (1991).

Plaintiffs have standing to raise this claim. Plaintiffs James Grinols and

Robert Odden are Presidential Electors who have been deprived of their ability to

cast a lawful vote for the Presidency, and Edward C. Noonan, Thomas Gregory

MacLeran, and Keith Judd have been deprived of a lawful election for the office of

the Presidency. Their claims are distinct, and the remedy sought herein will

redress these claims by preventing the codification of an unlawful election.

b. Justiciability

The integrity of the election system in the state of California is not non-

justiciable or purely a political issue. The Governor of California and its Secretary

of State have a mandatory duty to discharge the office by supporting both the

United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of California.

“It is emphatically the duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law

is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and

interpret the rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the Court must decide on the

operation of each.

Page 20: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

If courts are to regard the Constitution, and the Constitution is superior to

any ordinary act of the legislature, the Constitution, and not such ordinary act,

must govern the case to which they both apply.” Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 1

Cranch 137, 137 (1803).

Furthermore, it is the duty of the Governor and the Secretary of State of

California, and all members of the Legislature, all public officers (including

Electors) and employees, all executive, legislative, and judicial officers, to apply

constitutional regimen in the governance of a statewide election, pursuant to

their oath of office set forth here:

"I, ___________________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm)

that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the

Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and

domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the

United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this

obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion;

and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am

about to enter.

"And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a

member of any party or organization, political or other- wise, that now

Page 21: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the

State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within

the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation)

I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or other-

wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United

States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful

means except as follows:

(If no affiliations, write in the words "No Exceptions") and that during

such time as I hold the office of

_____________________________________________ I will not advocate

nor become (name of office) a member of any party or organization,

political or otherwise, that advocates the overthrow of the Government of

the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other

unlawful means." Article 20, Section 3, Constitution of the State of

California.

Because the Governor of the State of California, the Secretary of State, and

the Electoral College have a duty to preserve the integrity of the election system

under the United States Constitution; because Obama is in criminal violation of

Page 22: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

federal laws concerning his identity, and because he has failed to establish 1)

lawful citizenship; 2) a lawful name; 3) a lawful social security number

identification; 4) a lawful registration for the selective service system; 5) natural

born citizen status are required under Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the US

Constitution: plaintiffs have been deprived in 1) their ability to cast a lawful vote

for the Presidency (elector plaintiffs) and 2) their candidacies for President. This

can be redressed by this court when the court enjoins the Electoral College from

certifying its vote.

c. Mootness

The basic question in determining mootness is whether there is a present

controversy as to which effective relief can be granted. Feldman v. Bomar, 518

F.3d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 2008). In this case, this court is the last bulwark between

the life of the constitutional republic of the United States, and its demise. This

court can and should fashion relief, and because such an opportunity exists for

this court to enjoin the Electoral College from moving forward with the election of

a candidate for President who cannot lawfully hold the post, the issue before the

court is a present controversy and is not moot.

Page 23: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

The cause of action is one which “arises under” the Federal Constitution.

This complaint alleges that the certification of an ineligible candidate to the office

of the Presidency deprives Plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws in

violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Dismissal of the complaint upon the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the

subject matter would is not justified, because the case can only be dismissed if

the claim were “so attenuated and unsubstantial as to be absolutely devoid of

merit,” Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 579, or “frivolous,”

Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678, 683. That the claim is unsubstantial must be “very

plain.” Hart v. Keith Vaudeville Exchange, 262 U.S. 271, 274, 369 U.S. 186.

Furthermore, this court has a duty to enjoin an unlawful election in any

manner it deems appropriate. Pursuant to 28 USC § 453, all members of the

federal judiciary are required to take the following oath:

“I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer

justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to

the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all

the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the Constitution and laws of

the United States. So help me God.”

Page 24: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

At stake here is the Constitution and the laws of the United States. It is that

simple. Defendant Obama is in criminal violation of statutes governing the

identity of federal officers (18 USC § 1001), as this record amply demonstrates.

There is one last opportunity to arrest the destruction of the constitutional

republic, and it rests with this court.

Obama’s failure to properly register for the selective service system

disqualifies him from every holding a position in the Executive branch of the

United States, pursuant to 5 USC § 3328. This court has a duty to uphold the

federal law concerning this claim.

Plaintiffs face a substantial threat of irreparable damage or injury should an ineligible candidate be certified to the office of President.

It is the very essence of things American that the Presidency be occupied by

a person who is not just an American citizen, but who can establish that he is in

fact a lawful American and a natural born citizen of the United States. However,

the critical harm here is the harm to the rule of law under the Constitution of the

United States, the Constitution of the State of California, and the mandatory oath

of office required by the statutes of the State of California for the Secretary of

State, and the oath of office associated with this court.

Page 25: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

All of these oaths will be violated if a candidate who is acting criminally to

disguise his identity and who is not constitutionally authorized to hold the office

of the Presidency is nonetheless certified by the Electoral College as duly elected.

If Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the United States Constitution has no meaning,

than any and every clause of the Constitution is at risk. That is a substantial

threat of irreparable damage and injury.

Plaintiffs as electors (the Elector Plaintiffs) have a duty imposed on them to

act lawfully in the casting of votes for the Presidency, and their lawful vote is

vitiated entirely by electors who have voted for an illegal candidate for the office

of President. Plaintiffs as candidates for the office of President, have been

deprived of equal protection under the law and a free and fair election for the

office that has been usurped by Defendant Obama who is acting in criminal

violation of federal law and in violation of applicable constitutional provisions to

assert a claim for the office of the President.

Even the President must be accountable to the laws of the land, particularly

the eligibility clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Page 26: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

The vision that the founding fathers had of rule of law and equality

before the law and no one above the law, that is a very viable vision, but

instead of that, we have quasi mob rule. James Bovard.

The bedrock of our democracy is the rule of law and that means we

have to have an independent judiciary, judges who can make decisions

independent of the political winds that are blowing. Caroline Kennedy.

When freedom does not have a purpose, when it does not wish to

know anything about the rule of law engraved in the hearts of men and

women, when it does not listen to the voice of conscience, it turns against

humanity and society. Pope John Paul II.

Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under

God is acknowledged. Ronald Reagan.

We either believe in the dignity of the individual, the rule of law, and

the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, or we don't. There is no

middle ground.

Leon Panetta.

Page 27: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

The American people have a right to except that the rule of law will

guarantee that even if we don't like the policy, that it's done properly.

Darrell Issa.

I firmly believe in the rule of law as the foundation for all of our basic

rights.

Sonia Sotomayor.

A judge can't have any preferred outcome in any particular case. The

judge's only obligation - and it's a solemn obligation - is to the rule of law.

Samuel Alito.

One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with

complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s presidential

election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the nation’s

confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law. John

Paul Stevens.

Judges rule on the basis of law, not public opinion, and they should be

totally indifferent to pressures of the times. Warren E. Burger.

Page 28: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on

Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only

to have the law of nature for his rule. Samuel Adams.

The clearest way to show what the rule of law means to us in

everyday life is to recall what has happened when there is no rule of law.

Dwight D. Eisenhower.

A resilient people cherishing liberty and equality and the rule of law

will endure. Nick Rahall.

I am convinced that the majority of American people do understand

that we have a moral responsibility to foster the concepts of opportunity,

free enterprise, the rule of law, and democracy. They understand that these

values are the hope of the world. Richard Lugar

We stand in the shadow of Jefferson who believed that a society

founded upon the rule of law and liberty was dependent upon public

education and the diffusion of knowledge. Matt Blunt.

Unfortunately, the true force which propels our endless political

disputes, our constant struggles for political advantage, is often not our

Page 29: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

burning concern for democracy, it is often of our dedication to the principle

of the rule of law. Olusegun Obasanjo.

The United States and the European Union do want to have a rule of

law, and that rule of law should be for a fair trial. And that fair trial needs to

have an impartial jury. Maria Cantwell.

The rule of law should be upheld by all political parties. They should

neither advise others to break the law, nor encourage others to do so even

when they strongly disagree with the legislation put forward by the

government of the day. James Callaghan.

The balance of harms weighs in favor of Plaintiff.

Plaintiffs have a right as electors and candidates for the Presidency to a free

and fair election between eligible candidates, and this is a due process right

guaranteed under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The

right to vote is regarded as a fundamental political right, because it is preservative

of all rights.” Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886). An ineligible candidate

to an office has no articulable right in law or equity to that office, even if

unanimously elected by the general population.

Page 30: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Plaintiffs, in strict reliance on the admissions against interest of Barack

Hussein Obama as disclosed herein, and the record disclosed herein, have

demonstrated that as a matter of law, that Defendant Obama has acted criminally

to hide his true identity, that Defendant Obama has violated applicable federal

law governing the identity of federal officers, that Defendant Obama has

completely failed to demonstrate 1) lawful citizenship; 2) a lawful name; 3) a

lawful birth site; 4) a lawful selective service registration; 5) a lawful social

security number; and 6) natural born citizenship. As a consequence, Defendant

Obama does not meet the constitutional standards for eligibility. Therefore,

Defendant Obama has no articulable harm as a matter of law. He simply returns

to being a civilian.

The Court has more than once recognized the close nexus between the

freedoms of speech and assembly. De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353, 364 ;

Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516, 530 . It is beyond debate that freedom is an

inseparable aspect of the "liberty" assured by the Due Process Clause of the

Fourteenth Amendment, which embraces freedom of speech. See Gitlow v. New

York, 268 U.S. 652, 666 ; Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 324 ; Cantwell v.

Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 303 ; Staub v. City of Baxley, 355 U.S. 313, 321 . Of

course, it is immaterial whether the beliefs sought to be advanced pertain to

Page 31: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

political, economic, religious or cultural matters, and state action which may have

the effect of curtailing the freedom to associate is subject to the closest scrutiny.

NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449, 460-461 (1958).

In the domain of these indispensable liberties, whether of speech, press, or

association, the decisions of this Court recognize that abridgment of such rights,

even though unintended, may inevitably follow from varied forms of

governmental action. NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449, 461 (1958).

The furtherance of an election that is fraudulent is violative of all liberty

interests protected under the United States Constitution and creates an

unimaginable harm to all political interests which have been protected in this

nation since its founding, including the class of litigants sought to be certified

hereunder.

The grant of an injunction would serve the public interest.

The public is served by having free and fair elections; elections where

registered voters in California lawfully chose between candidates who are eligible

to hold office.

Page 32: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS AND THIS COURT WILL BE GUILTY OF TREASON

AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA AND THE US CONSTITUTION, IF THE CETIFICATE OF VOTE IS CERTIFIED

AND CITIZEN OF INDONESIA BARACK OBAMA IS ALLOWED TO BECOME THE US

PRESIDENT

In 2008 the Plaintiffs did not have all the evidence which became available

recently, however recently obtained information shows that

1. according to Obama's school records he is a citizen of Indonesia.

2. according to his mother's passport records his last name is Soebarkah

3. he is using a forged birth certificate

4. he is using a forged Selective Service Certificate

5. he is using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 which was

never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS

6. available school pictures and documents from Kaelani school in Hawaii show

him residing in Hawaii at least until January 1969. his School records from Assissi

School in Jakarta, Indonesia, show him under name Barry Soetoro residing in

Indonesia from January 1967. As one human being cannot reside in two countries

Page 33: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

at the same time for a period of two years, it is clear that there are two distinctive

individuals: Barry Obama, who resided in Hawaii and Barry Soetoro, who resided

in Indonesia between 1967 and 1969. We have no idea which one of the two

came back to the United States of America in and around 1971. Since all the IDs

represent forgeries, all of the defendants and this court will be committing HIGH

TREASON, if they certify as the legitimate President and Commander in Chief a

foreign citizen with all forged IDs and a stolen/ fraudulently obtained Social

Security number

IF THE DEFENDANTS AND THIS COURT CERTIFY OBAMA AS A LEGITIMATE

PRESIDENT, WHILE POSSESSING ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS AT HAND, THEY MAY

BE LATER PROSECUTED AS BEING A PART OF A RICO, RACKETEERING

CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD AMERICAN CITIZENS AND COMMIT FOLLOWING

PREDICATE ACTS:

18, United States Code: section 1028 (relating to fraud and related

activity in connection with identification documents, section

1341(relating to mail fraud),section 1343 (relating to wire

fraud},section 1425 (relating to the procurement of citizenship or

nationalization unlawfully}, section 1426 (relating to the reproduction

of naturalization or citizenship papers), section

Page 34: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

1427 (relating to the sale of naturalization or citizenship papers},

section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice}, section 1510

(relating to obstruction of criminal investigations}, section

1511(relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement),

section 1542 (relating to false statement in application and use of

passport), section 1543 (relating to forgery or false use of passport},

section 1544 (relating to misuse of passport),section 1546 (relating to

fraud and misuse of visas, permits and other documents, section 1952

(relating to racketeering), sections 2314 and 2315 (relating to

interstate transportation of stolen property},section 2320 (relating to

trafficking in goods or services bearing counterfeit marks), (F) any act

which is indictable un_der the Immigration and Nationality

Act,section 274 (relating to bringing in and harboring certain

aliens),section 277 (relating to aiding or assisting certain aliens to

enter the United States).

This Court should act AS TO THE DEFENDANTS from making an

election where the candidate who prevailed is ineligible to serve. The

preservation of the integrity of the voting system requires it.

CONCLUSION

Page 35: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

The record before the court amply demonstrates that Defendant Obama is

not eligible/not legitimate for the position of the U.S. Presidency.

Plaintiffs have met their burden to demonstrate that the evidence

proffered by Defendant Obama to date is falsified, and amounts to criminal

falsification under applicable federal law as set forth herein. Plaintiffs have also

demonstrated that Obama’s failure to properly register for the selective service

system has disqualified him from every holding the office of the President.

Plaintiffs have demonstrated and met their burden of proof to establish that

Defendant Obama is operating under a fraudulent Social Security number. As a

consequence, Defendant Obama does not meet the constitutional standards for

eligibility. Therefore, Defendant Obama has no articulable harm as a matter of

law. He simply returns to being a civilian.

Plaintiffs ask this court for extraordinary relief, in what can only be called

extraordinary times. Never before has the nation faced such an audacious

usurpation of its offices, it laws, its constitutional protections, its rights, its

freedom, even its very life as a Constitutional Republic. While it is an

extraordinary demand for relief, the times call for such extraordinary acts by this

court as the very last bulwark of freedom in this country.

Page 36: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al
Page 37: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Phone 949-683-541,I f ax 949-7 66-7 603

Orlv.ta itz@ sma il.com

Counselor for the Plaintiffs

US District Court

For the Eastern District of California

James Grinols, Robert Odden, in their capacity )Case # 12-cv-02997

as Presidential Electors )MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

Edward C. Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, ) RESTRAINING ORDER

Keith Judd in their capacity as )

candidates for the U.S. President )

v Electoral College, President of the Senate, )

Governor of California, Secretary of State )

of California, U.S. Congress )

)

)

)

INTRODUCTION

Grinols et alv ElectoralCollege et al Petition forTRO 1

Page 38: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Plaintiffs bring this action as Presidential Electors and as candidates for U.S.

President, who, having been deprived of lawful process in the statewide election

lor the national office of U.S. President held in Califomia on November 6, 2012, as

a direct and proximate result ofthe mispersonation and elections fraud perpetrated

by defendant Obama, seek redress from this court to enjoin:

[. Secretary ofState and Governor from certifying the Certificate of Ascertainment

due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the citizen oflndonesia

Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama

Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position ofthe Commander

in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged long form birth

cerlificate, forged Selective Service certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social

Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office

2. The Electoral College from tallying their votes due to lack of legitimacy for

office and fraud aommitted by the citizen oflndonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka

Barack (BaIry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for

the U.S. Presidency and position ofthe commander in-Chief, while using a forged

short fonn birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective

Service certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425

as a proofofhis legitirnacy and fitness for olfice

crinols et alv ElectoralColleee et al Petition forTRO

Page 39: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

5. U.S. Congress from confirming the elections results due to lack of legitimacy for

office and fraud committed by the citizen oflndonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka

Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for

the U.S. Presidency and position ofthe commander in-Chief, while using a forged

short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective

Service certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx4425

as a proof ofhis legitimacy and fitness for offrce

6. Defendant Barack Hussein Obama from taking the oath of office as a U.S.

President on the inauguration day due to his lack of legitimacy for office and fraud

committed by him, as the citizen oflndonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack

(Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S.

Presidency and position ofthe Commander in-Chief, while using a forged short

form birth cerlificate, forged long form bidh ceftificate, forged selective Seruice

certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a

proofofhis legitimacy and fitness for office.

Plaintiffs, who are Presidential electors and Presidential candidates have standing

to raise these claims as directly interested parties. These claims arejusticiable, and

as this court has one last opportunity to act, the claims are not mool Jacobs v.

Clark County Sch. Dist., 526 F.3d 419, 425 (9'h Cir. 2008). Plaintiffs incorporate

Grinols et alv ElectoralCollege et alPetitionforTRO

Page 40: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

herein the complaint and petition for injunctive relief filed herein on 12.12.2012

and exhibits ppl-107 to aforementioned complaint and petition for injunctive relief

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiffs incorporate herein the complaint and petition for injunctive relieffiled

herein on 12.12.2012 ad evhibits ppl-107 to aforementioned complaint and

petition for injunctive relief.

Defendant Obama is not qualified for the office of U.5. President, as he is a

citizen of lndonesia operating under an alias.

Defendant Obama is using a forged birth certificate to validate his claim of

an American birth. ln proffering false documents in order to obtain a federal

position, Defendant Obama (in this case, the Presidency) has violated 18 USC 5

91.1 (falsely representing that he is a US citizen); and 18 USC 5 1001 (June 25,

1948, ch. 645, 62 Sta\.7 49; Pu b. L, r.03-322. title XXX |, S 330016(1XL), Sept. 13,

7994, 1-08 Stat. 21-47; Pub. L. 'J.O4-292,5 2, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 stat. 3459; Pub. L.

108-458, title Vt, 5 67O3(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766; Pub. L. 109-248. title t,

E ML(cl, )uly 27,2006, 120 Stat. 603.) in falsifying his identity as a member of the

executive branch of the federal government.

Grinols et alv ElectoralCollege et alPetitionforTRo 5

Page 41: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Defendant Obama is using a forged Selective Service Certificate to

demonstrate his claim of a lawful registration for the draft, when no such

registration occurred. ln proffering a falsified draft registration, Defendant

obama has violated 18 Usc 5 1001, and is further disqualified from holding any

position within the Executive branch of the United States government pursuant to

s usc s 3328.

Defendant Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number which was

never assigned to him as a proof of his identity. ln proffering a false social security

number, Defendant Obama, is in criminal violation of 42 USC 5 408, which

provides as follows;

(a) ln general

Whoever - (6) willfully, knowingly, and with intent to deceive the

Commissioner of Social Security as to his true identity (or the true identity

of any other person) furnishes or causes to be furnished false information

to the Commissioner of Social Security with respect to any information

required by the Commissioner of Social security in connection with the

establishment and maintenance of the records provided for in section

Grinols et al v Electoral College et al Petition for TRo 6

Page 42: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duty, and so bear ourselves that if

the Republic of the United States of America lasts for a thousand years, men will

still say, this wos their linest hour,

Respecrfrlly submitted this i9 day of bcnnber,2012.

DR. ORLYTAITZESQAttomey for Plaintif&

Grinols et alv Ehctoral College et al Petluon for TRO 30

Page 43: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Proposed order

Grinols et alv Electoralcollege et al Petition forTRO 3L

Page 44: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

US District Court

For the Eastern District of California

iames Grinols, Robert Odden, in their capacity )Case# 12-cv-02997

as Presidential Electors )MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

Edward C. Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, ) RESTRAINING ORDER

Keith Judd in their capacity as )

candidates for the U.S. President )

v Electoral College, President ofthe Senate, )

Governor of California, Secretary of State )

of California, U.S. Congress l

)

)

Upon consideration ofthe Motion for TRO, Complaint, petition for

Declaratory Relief and Injunctive relief incorporat€d by reference, attached

exhibits and responsive pleadings

Hearing on

this court ORDERS as follows

To Grant Temporary Restraining Order pending adjudication on the merits as

follows: To ENJOIN:

l. Secretary of State and Govemor l}om certifuing the Certificate of Ascertainment

due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the citizen oflndonesia

Grinols et alv Electoral College etal Petition forTRo 32

Page 45: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama

Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position ofthe Commander

in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged long form bifth

certificate, forged Selective Service certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social

Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proofofhis legitimacy and fitness for office

2 . The Electoral College from tallying iheir votes due to lack of legitimacy for

office and fraud committed by the citizen oflndonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka

Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his mn for

the U.S. Presidency and position oftlre commander in-Chief, while using a forged

short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective

Service certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425

as a proofofhis legitimacy and fitness for office

3. govemor ofCA from forwarding the Certificate ofElectoral Vote to the US

Congress due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the citiznn

oflndonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack

(Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position of

the commander in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged

long form birth certificate, forged selective Service certificate and a stolen

Grinols et al v Electora I college et al Petition for TRo 33

Page 46: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and

fitness for office

4. President ofthe Senat€ from presenting the Certificates ofthe Electoral Vote to

the U.S. Congress due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the

citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka

Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and

position ofthe comrnander in-Chiell while using a forged short form birth

certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective Service certificate

and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number rco<-xx-4425 as a proofofhis

legitimacy and fitness for office

5. U.S. Congress from confirming the elections results due to lack of legitimacy for

office and fraud committed by the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obarna, aka

Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for

the U.S. Presidency and position ofthe commander in-Chief, while using a forged

short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective

Service certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxr-xx-4425

as a proof ofhis legitimacy and fitness for office

Grinols et alv Electo.al College et al Petition for TRo 34

Page 47: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

6. Defendant Barack Hussein Obama from taking the oath ofoffice as a U.S.

President on the inauguration day due to his lack of legitimacy for office and fraud

committed by him, as tle citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack

(Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S.

Presidency and position ofthe Commander in-Chiei while using a forged short

form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective Service

certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a

proofofhis legitimacy and fitness for office.

Further adjudication on the merits will take place

on

So ordered and adjudged

Honorable Morison C. England

Chief Judge U.S. Disfiict Court Eastem District of Califomia

Dated

Grinols et alv Electoral College et al Petition forTRO 35

Page 48: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Affidavit of of Notice

I Orly Taitz, counsel on the case attest

l. complaint, summons and exhibits were served on the defendants by

sending aforementioned documents by ovemight Federal express on

12.18.2012

2. Motion for TRO and attached Check list forms were served on the

defendants by sending aforementioned documents by ovemight Federal

express on 12.19.2012

/s/ Dr Orly Taitz ESQ .//

t2.lg.2ol2 ) " n'JAFFIDAVIT OF IRREPARABLf, HARM

Plaintiffs herein are Presidential Candidates and Presidential Electors.

P residential elections are being certified within days.

Oath of office ofthe new President will be taken next month.

Plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm ofa lost el€ction and hability to

exercise a right to vote by the Presidential electors-

,'a -

._.- / /.l . ,1,/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

counsel for Plaintifs

Grinols et alv Electoral Colleae etalP€tition for TRO 36

Page 49: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Grinols et alv ElectoralCollege et al Petition forTRO 31

Page 50: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTEASITERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TEITPORARY RESTRANING ORDER(rRo)

CHECKLIST

NOTE: When filing a Motion for a TRO with the court, you must choose Motjon for TRO. you mustcomplete this document and attach is to your mo on as an attachment in CM/ECF. lf you havequ€stions, please calt th€ CiTECF Holp Desk at 1-866-884-5525 (Sacramento) or1 -866-884-5444 (Fresno).

(A) Check one. Filing party is represented by counsgl AFiting party is acling in pro se n

(B) Has there been acfual notice, or a sufficient showing of efforts to provide notice to the affected party?See Local Rule 61231 and FRCP 6S(b).

Did applicant discuss alternatives to a TRO hearing?

Did applicant ask opponent to stipulate to a TRO?

Opposing Party: U.S. anomcy .epre6en$ng Feablal detcndants, AG ropresentlng stato dofendents

Telephone No.: US Attomey 918-554-2700 AG of CA 9t6i22n360

(C) Has there been undue delay ln bringing a TRO?

Could lhis have been brought earlier?

Yes: E No: A

Page 51: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

TRO Checklist - P€ge 2

(D) What is the irreparable injury?

lnabilily by th€ Pre3idontial Electors to vote and have their voL ceralfiod for a logftim.te candldai€, lossofa contest for U.S. prcsldent, dgprivation ofrlghls rolated to voting by the Preildonllal €leclors

Why the need for an expedited hearing?

immedlate Imp6nding u6urpation of lhe U.S. Presldency due to Dotendant Obame's use gf forg€d lDs andu3e of a CT Social Socurity numb.r xxx-rx.4425 which waa hever assigned lo hirh accordlng to E.vedtand ssNvs

(E) Documents to be itled and (unless impossible) sqved on affectd pafties/counsel:

A (\ complaint

@ (2) Motion for TRo

E (3) Brief on ail legal issued pres€nted by the motion

A @ Affidavit detailing notice, or efforts to effect notice, orshowjng why it should not be given

g (5) Affidavit in support of exigtence of irreparable harm

E (6) Proposed order wjlh provision for bond

A 0 Proposed order with blanks for fixing:

E lime and date of hearing for motion for preliminary injunction

! Dale for filing responsive papers

D Amount of bond, if any

C Date and hour of issuanc€

n (B) For TROS requested €xpart6, proposed order shall notify affected parties then canapply to the court for modification/dissolution on 2 days notic€ or such shorter notic€ asthe court may allow. See Local Rulo 61231 and FRCP 65(b)

Page 52: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

r .{er€d a 6py d the empr.int o0 FgE) add e0,uc ( ro7 e,96) G

Nek to subDr mo (r.F dary astcn,rc ordei)

-vent lnd ssNvs, due ro.vden.e!r ro46ryf s

dlega|lvh'''lun@'dlh'taai$ne rea<dis (conprai'r and o'der by rldqe dFrrer spoftd or o yracEsa.@)

*purateGoEa)iorRoofcedf&to n bo h.rrd di the md ts by the q 6nd'nq ,!dqe& oot 3!pd.re(do d rcr*) b rno

2 42 PM (ro hrndes a9o)

d .me.r h!td.3(@cd leuc.cry

Notice of Electronic Filingon r 2/r4l20r? at 2:r2 B PSr .nd id 6 \21t.t20\2

"..-*,*, ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 121'14112DENYING Plaintiffs' [2] Request. lf the parties wish to proceed with theirrequest for a temporary restraining order, they are hereby ordered to filethe documents listed in this order by 12121112, (Manzer, C)

*h*nd*rrc criyfrdl.dbl

ov..tonart bt th. nbr b:rh. fori@,'e eumen(sl .e .!*

t d4ln€Dt $6r' tsrauP ldsr!hp-rD- to51e43517 ID.b=12/1./20121lF r.Nuner-s37534e. 0l l7d5r7a51

Page 53: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Certificate of service

I, Lila Dubert, attest that I am over l8 years old, not a parry to this case and

that I served attached pleadings to all the parties in this case on December

19,?012 by first class mail

i

/V Lila Dubert {r.' *i:,'*^_,--cc u.s. and lnternat;onal media

cc Congrcssnan Gregg Harper (R-MS)

Chairman

United State House Administration Subcommittee on Eledion

307 House Office Building

Washington DC 20515

ph 202-225-5031

fax 202-22s-5797

ccGregg Harper, Mississippi, Chairman

Aaron Shock, Illinois

Rich Nugent, Florida

Todd Rokita, lndiana

Bob Brady, Pennsylvania, Ranking Member

CharliE Gonzalez, Texas

Grinols et al v Electoral College et al Pelitlon for TRO 1

Page 54: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

cc Congressman Darrell Issa

Chairman

House Oversight Committee

2347 Raybum House Building

Washington DC, 205 I 5

cc Congressman Mike Rogers

Chainnan

House Intelligence Committee

133 Cannon House Office building

Washington DC 20515

cc Congressman Sam Johnson

Chairman

House Subcommitte.e on Social Security

House Ways and Means Committee

2929 N Central Expy, 240

Richadso'n, TX 75080

cc Congressman Dana Rohrbacher

Grlnols et al v Electoral College d al Petition for TRO

Page 55: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Chairman

House Subcommitdee on Oversight and Investigations'

House Committee on Foreign Affairs

2300 Raybum House Building

Washington DC 20515

US Commission

on Civil Rights

624 Ninth Street, NW

\lrashington, DC 20425 C

Public Integrity Section

Department ofJustice

950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington DC 20530-0001

Int€r -American Commission on Human Rights

1889 F Street, N.W.. Washington, D.C., 20005 U.S.A..

Tel.: 202-458{002, 202458-6002. Fax: 202458-3992.

Grinols et al v Electoral Colle8e et al Petltlon for TRo 3

Page 56: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

Special Rapporteur on the Situation ofHuman Rights Defenders

The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya

Pa.lais des Nations

CH-121I Geneva 10, Switzerland

Intemational Criminal bar Hague

BPI-ICB.CAPI

Head Offrce

Neuhuyskade 94

2596 XM The Hague

The Netherlands

Tel :0031 (70)3268070 0031 (70)3268070

Fax : 0031 (70) 3353531

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.bpi-icb.org

Regional Office - Arnericas / Bureau rdgional - Am6riques / Oficina regional -

Amdricas

137, rue St-Piene

Montrdal, Qudbec, Canada, lI2Y 3T5

Grinols et alv Electoral College et al Petition forTRO 4

Page 57: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Tel : 001 (514) 289-8757 001(s14)289-87s7

Fax : 001 (514) 289-85m

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.bpi-icb.org

Laura Vericat Figarola

BPI-ICB-CAPI

Secretaria Barceiona

[email protected]

Address: Avenida Diagonal!29 12'

08029 Barcelonq Espafla

tel/fax 0034 93 405 14 24

United Nations Commission for

Civil Rights Defenders

Orsolya Toth (Ms)

Human Rights officer

Civil and Political fughts Section

Special Procedures Division

Office of the Hieh Commissioner for Human Rights

Grinolset alv Electoral College et alPetition for TRO 5

Page 58: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

tel: + 41 22917 91 51

email: [email protected]

Grinols et alv ElectoralCollege et alPetitionforTRO 6

Page 59: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

:e&, NIP ?:;:1.'7u{;'':,,,,"";r;

Express {.-l# r--iff :"liij Number 80aa lEEn e&714 ftpress Package Service *Tomdrodom

I{OTE: Sewice order has chansed. Please selod carelully

Packages up to 150 lbsht rehawowffilb.Mturcw

htu Epffi tuisHUS frfiiil

wfffir*q1wn FedEx2DavA.M.I I secondbusnedsmonrnq-

Saturday Delivery N0T available.

n FedEx2DavI I SecondOusnessatomoon.'Thu6davshipmenb

- wll he del ve.ed on Mondav unless SATUBDAY

Deliveryh selecbd-

n FedExExoressSaverI frndbusinedsdav'

Satudav Delivery N0T availab e

5fr4Your lnternal Billing RelerenceFl$ 24 chatac@rs will appear on invoice.

5 Packaging rDd'Ed€ru€ridsm.

I FedExEnvelope* fl f.of"euf fl FedEx ; ledEx l=l gt'er! Box L lube

ToRecipient'sName

6 Special Handling and Delivery Signature Options

r_] SAT|RDAYDeliverv' I iloT.vail.blclor'edu srindarc 0!enqht FedbAavA V o kdu &p'€ss savea

I-

No Sionature Reouired \-/Direct SignatureI Packdo;mavoe efrffiou \ ,f Soreol"atrecipiedsadd'ess! ohan;q.siarar-'e'o'de..ery v TavssnrcrdeNeryturyrra

Dopsttis shipmemcontain dangerous goods?

, J One box must be checked.*/

-Yes -YesVt'lo L l $;ffiliyo:Ti,o" L-_1 -s3;t6,'0"*u"*- L lDaro€r0ussoodslincludinq dryice) canndbe shipped ln Fede packagins

or placed in a FedAtuprcss Drop Bor

lndirect Siqnature

- lf no one h alailable d recipredsaddre$,someone il a neqhboring

- addr€ss mavsonlordelvery For

resLdemal deltuedes only tu ryPlta

H0LD Saturdaytodabcdnaddres

- R€0U|RD A€ibile oNUh

I tod&PnoryovemiqfrandFed&Dayb$ledlocatons

Drv lceDrylce,9,UN r&5

-

(- ks

I CargoAircraft0nly

Billto:

-

EfierFedExAcdl{o.orCreditcardl{o.below --

--

$"]jru**" !Fecipient !triroearty f CreditCard f Cash/Check

bs. S

-.S

l0,trlbdNsrmneotoUSImrn'€ssvo-de!lar€.h(lervaLeSeebasooeDhBvus{tisAdiltru*^". m # seru.ce conltons on me oih ol fE Atroi aro n tre c -rel ledb serc€ Cu d" nt lJdins brsm:d [mfr our ]iability.

Fev oate 1/r2.Pad#r67002.O20r2FedEx.PfiLNTEo lN US.A. S8r

NEW ::':.:':!:ta;rrS.&r jxil

FedATrackinqNumber

gIee lee[ 7131 rs,: EEBt]

?rr: {&:r// ffi,

-

locabonslrda!snromeGwllbederve'€dor

t2 ,f) i' '-T / Mondsvunes'sAruRDA!Derveryss€rec€dY L/a 7 .Ft h' n t:l*ffs:g*?nielrl,""*- ,"-' -f

7-- - oerve'€do-Monoavl.lesssAru8DA\Deltuery

,e.a {s* rr f fu r lft1ff ii"#"ifl"il4ir::::l *,

Total Packages TotalWeight Tcrtal Declared Valuet

1 ttom Plea* ptit tandgess hard.'La{}-';:""Y;'i:,ft"

4 ExpressPackageService'romdredonsNoTEi Sewice 0tderftas changed. Please selectctrefuily

Packages up to 150 lbs.ht ,ackq* ow\fl ltu . M ke naw

kd& bpw tuigtr US frfrilt.ffi-{rsr* lffi# " Hl*l;.iil;i:J,'f,ffiitilih!ts::[i | " i3i"1iii;xr;ii'T?n!r",'"

^ ryndavJlesssAluHUAvuehvefrrsse€creo l

V^:**,r,,*:yp,ytiisl$m,,*""; I r [4iH:i?lY6,,,;l,",jrr,iri"dri*ll.liJ""':J"iii^il"ijvii' i'iii'tillidrv 0"i""ry | d rm e iveed.on vmdavm 'hseeded. I u€rveryrsseecreo

FedExstandardOvernight | 1 FedExExpres,sSaverNef0u$nessafiernoon.' " I L,l frrdb-sine$daY-'SauroayDdNen \0- ava ldbre. I SatfdavDelveryNOI ava lab'e

6sr"n,mr#dffiztp / Z4 dC 5 Packaging 'Decrarcdvaruerinilsn

q

Your lnternal Billing RelerenceFd24 charac@rsffll appearon invobe

n FedExEnverope* @ t"ootuo. tl FB'.XE- tr l:i!^ [ ott.,

I Cash/Check

hp.

Total Packages Total Weiglrt Total DeclaredValuel

--lbs

$-- m

louriabilrybhmfldoJ$lmJlessyouoec,a.eanglevalu€.Seebarkforo€ta[-Byusirgh\Adillrcuao,cetnhpscto,.€conddonsonSeDdckolSsAfril andilhe(.roll FduseMceuu6€ ncr_orgBms

h:d imil ou llabilrty.

Rev Dare r/12. P6rt*r67m2.02012 FedEx. PB NTED lN U S A SFF

3ToBecipient's

Address

€4zP-

Dept,froor/Sutunoom

H0LD WeekdayFedklocaton addrcss

a l FE0UIRED NoTalail.blelo'L l Fedb Frn0vernqht.

H0LD Saturdaytudtu Ln.fr.nrddres

6 Special Handling and Delivery Signature Options

. r SATUBDAYDeliverut l M.;il.;btor dAstinoa d ovenshtFedb 20avAM or reob bp ess Save-

I tndirect Sionature

- No Sionature Reouired [

-4irectSignature - {nooneravafabealreciois{s

I p"..aoelm,voe'enffiiu '\-/1 Soneo'eaI+crpedsaddess addr.ss soreo-ealaneisiborils! 0h;ri0rii!"il-?iorerea : -dvssnro oeivpatu4d,b - r"%"fi$11,il'JlfJ::1,:"#r,h*

Does tris shipment contain dangelous goods?

Ono box mustbschecked- / -t-"

-vocN//6 D di*py,:u,","" L iiict;l3f"-*" L l 3,#,!l'9,n,*o -' -,sDans€rcusso9ds{includinsdryice)canndbeshipp€dhFed&Fckasins ! CargoAirCraft0nlyor obced ln a Fedk &prcss omp Box.

7 Prymefi. Bilttu:

t / ErertedbAcdNo orcEditcadlo below

M#$tJtt*. I Recipienr Ittriroearty ! creditcard

todePrr&' 7tP

Page 60: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Phone 949-683-54Lt f ax 949-7 66-7 603

[email protected]

Counselor for the Plaintiffs

US District Court

For the Eastern District of California

James Grinols, Robert Odden, in their capacity )Case #

as Presidential Electors ) Declaratory and lnjunctive

Edward C. Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, ) Relief

Keith Judd in their capacity as )Petition for

candidates for the U.S. President ) Extraordinary Emergency Writ of

v Electoral College, President of the Senate, )Mandamus/ Stay of Certification

Governor of California, Secretary of State ) of votes for Presidential

of California, U.S. Congress, Barack Hussein ) Candidate Obama due to

Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka )elections fraud and his use of

Barack Obama Soebarkah, in his capacity as a I invalidfiorged/ fraudulently

Candidate for the U.S.President in 2012 )obtained lDs

(petition for permanent injunction is pending)

Grinolsetalvelectoralcollege2012,PresidentoftheSenateetal Petition for STAY 1

Page 61: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Petitioners are seeking certification as class representatives and class action

certification

PARTIES

Edward Noonan, Hereinafter "Noonan", winner of the California American

Independent Party Primary for the U.S. President. Edward Noonan's Certificate ofnomination as the American lndependent party candidate for the U.5. President is

attached as exhibit 1. Noonan resides at 1213 11th Ave, Olivehurst, CA 95961.

Keith Judd, Hereinafter "Judd" -Democratic Party candidate for the U.5. President,

a runner up in the Democratic party primary in West Virginia, received 40% of the

vote, more than any other Democratic party challenger to Obama, would be a

Democratic party nominee, if it is found that Obama was not eligible due to

elections fraud and use of forged lDs.

Thomas Gregory MacLeran, {Hereinafter "MacLeran") Candidate for the US

President, registered with the FEC, would be affected if it is found by the court

that obama as not a legitimate candidate for the U.5. President due to elections

fraud committed by him and due to his use offorged lDs. ln case a stay is issued

and a new election is scheduled, MacLeran's rights will be affected.

James Grinols is a Republican party elector who was deprived of his right toparticipate in the electoral college 2012, due to the fact that Democratic party

electors representing candidate Obama were seated based on fraud and use of

forged lDs by Obama. Grinols is seeking a certification as a representative of a

class of Republican party Electors and electors in general seeking to stop Electoral

college 2012 from certifying electoral votes obtained by fraud and forgery

Robert Odden is a Libertarian party elector, who was deprived of his right topa rticipate in the electoral college 2012, d ue to the fact that Democratic party

electors representing candidate Obama were seated based on fraud and use offorged lDs by Obama. Grinols is seeking a certification as a representative of a

class of Libertarian party Electors and electors in general seeking to stop Electoral

college 2012 from certifying electoral votes obtained by fraud and forgery

Grinols et alvelectoralcollege 2012, President ofthe senate et al Petition forSTAY

Page 62: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Electoral College 2012 - 20L2 Electoral College is sued as a governmental agency

that was elected as a result of 2012 general election and which convenes only

once, on Decembe r 17 ,2072 - Electoral college is sued to STAY certification of

electoral votes 2012 due to fraud and use of forged lDs by Candidate Obama.

ln case the court finds that it is not willing to adjudicate against the electoral

college as one governmental agency, Plaintiffs are seeking adjudication against 55

California electors, who are subject to the jurisdiction ofthis court and joining

258 remaining Democratic Party electors from 26 other states, who are pledged

to Candidate Obama, based on pendent party jurisdiction as the claim arose froma common nucleus of operative fact and under Exxon Mobil v Alapatah services

545 U.5. 546 and under 28 USC 1367.

President of the Senate - Joseph Biden, President of the Senate is sued in his

official ca pacity to Stay/enjoin presentment by the President of the senate to thejoined session of Congress the results of 2012 electoral college elections and in his

capacity as a representative of Congress enjoining Congress from certifying the

results of 2012 electoral college elections due to fraud and use of forged/fraudulently obtained lDs and fraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security

numberxxx-xx-4425 by Candidate Barack Hussein Obama

U.S. Congress is sued as a governmental agency in it's capacity and ministerial

duty to vote and confirm the results of the electoral college election of the U.s.

President. Plaintiffs are seeking to enjoin the U.S. congress from voting forCandidate Obama due to fraud committed by Obama and his use of forged lDs as

a basis of his eligibility for the U.5. Presidency

Governor of California and Secretary of State of California are sued in their official

ministerialduty as state officials certifying results of 2012 elections and

presenting the certificate of ascertainment to the electoral college.

Barack Hussein Obama- candidate for the U.S. President

VENUE AND JURISDICTION

Grinols et al v electoral college 2012, President of the Senate et al Petition for STAY 3

Page 63: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

This court has Jurisdiction as the U.S. Federal agencies are defendants, and

controversy involves federal question 28 U.S.C. g 1331 (federal question)

Venue is proper as defendants Governor of California and secretary of state ofCalifornia are located in the Eastern District of California

LEGAL BASIS

The United States Electoral Coll€ge is the institution that oilicially elects the President and

Vice Presjdent of the United States every lour years. The President and Vice President arc flot

elected directlyby the voters. Instead, they are elected indircctly by "electors" who are elected by

populirl vote on a state by state basis. Eleclors are apportioned to each state and the District of

Columbia, but not to territorial possessions of the United States, sLrch as Puerto Rico and GLla$.

The number olelectors in each state is equal to the number of members of Congress to which the

state is entitled. The Twenty-third Amendment has always resulted in the District of Columbia

having three elcctors. There are 538 electo$, based on there being 435 representatives and 100

senators, plus the three electors from the District of Columbia. Electors chosen on Election Day

meet in their respective state capitals (or in the case of Washington, D.C., within the Distdct) on

the Monday after rhe second wednesday in December, at which time they cast their electoral

votes on separate ballots for President and Vice President.

The Electoral College never actually meets as one body. Although procedures in each state vary

slightly, the electors generally follow a similar series of steps, and the Congress has

constitutional authority to regulate the procedures the states tbllow. The meeting is opened by

the election ce ification official-often that state's secretary of state or equivalent-who reads

the CERTIFICATE OF ASCERTAINIIENT. This documcnt sets forth who was chosen to

Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, President of the Senate et al Petition for STAY

Page 64: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

cast the electoral votes. Each elector submits a w tten ballot with the name of a candidate for

President. The next step is the casting of the vote lbr Vice President, which follows a similar

Pattern.

Each state's electors must complete six CERTIFICATES OF VOTE. Each Certificate of Vote

must be signed by all of the electors and a CERTIFICATE OF ASCERTAINMENT must be

attached to each of the Certificates of Vote. Each Certificate of Vote must include the names of

those who received an electoral vote for either the office of President or of Vice President. The

electors certify the CERTIFICATES OF VOTE and copies of the Ceftificates are then sent in

the following fashion

One is sent by registered mail to the President of the Senate (who usually is the Vice President);

Two are sent by registered mailto the Archivist ofthe United States;

Two are sent to the state's Secretary ofState; and

One is sent to the chiefjudge ofthe United States district court where those eledors met.

A staff member of the PRESIDENT OF TIIE SENATE collects the Ceftificates of vote as

they ar.ive and prepares them for the joint session of the Congress. The Certificates are

arranged-unopened-in alphabetical order and placed in two special mahogany boxes.

Alabama tluough Missouri (including Washington, D.C.) are placed in one box altd Montana

through Wyoming are placed in the other box. The Twelfth Amendment mandates that the

CONGRESS assemble injoint session to count the electoral votes and declare the \{inners ofthe

election.l6l The session is ordinarily required to take place on January 6 in the calendar year

immediately following fte meetings of the presidential electors. Si[ce the Twentieth

Grinols et alv electoral college 2012, President ofthe Senate et al Petition for STAY

Page 65: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Amendment, the newly elected House declarcs the winner of thc election; all elections before

1936 were determined by the outgoing House instead.

The meeting is held at I:00 pm in the Chamber of the U.S. House of Reprcsentatives. Thc sitting

Vice President is expected to preside, but in several cases the President pro tempote of the

Senate has chaired the proceedings instead. Results of the electoral vote can be challenged by at

least one Reprcsentative and one senator.

REQT]EST FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION AND FOR

CERTIFICATION OF PLAINTIFFS AS REPRESENTATIVES OF A

CLASS

Plaintifls are seeking a class certification and a certification of a class

representativc herein.

Plaintif'f Grinols is seeking certification as a representative of a class of

Republican Party electors and electors in general.

Plaintiff Odden is seeking certification as a representative of a class of

Libertarian Party electors and electors in general.

Plaintiff Judd is seekng certification as a representative of a class of the

Democratic Party Presidential candidates and Presidential candidates in general

PlaintilT Macleran is seeKng certit'ication as a reprcsentative of Republican

party candidates and Presidenl.ial candidatcs in general

Grinolsetalvelectoralcollege2012,PresidentoftheSenateetal Petition for STAY 6

Page 66: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Plaintiff Noonan seeks certification of a representative of a class of minor

party Presidential candidates and Presidential candidates in general

This action can be maintained as a class action under FRCP Rule 23, which

states as follow:

(a) Prerequisites. One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as

representative parties on behalf of all members only if:

(l )The class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable;

(2)There are questions of law or fact cornmon to the class;

(3)The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the

claims or defenses of the class; and

(4) The representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests

of the call.

(b) Types of Class Actions. A class action may be maintained of Rule 23(a) is

satistied arrd if:

(l) Prosecuting separate actions by or against individual class members

would create a risk of:

(A) Inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual class

members that would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the

party opposing the class; or

Grinols et alv electo ra I college 2012, President ofthe Senate €t al Petition for STAY 7

Page 67: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

(B) Adjudications with respect to individual class members that, as a

practical matter, would be dispositive of the interests of the other

members not parties to the individual adjudications or would

substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests;

(2) The party opposing the class had acted or refirsed to act on grounds

that apply generally to the class, so that final injunctive relief or

corresponding declaratory relief is appropriate respecting the class as a

whole; or

(3) The court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class

members predominate over any questions affectin-a only individual

members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for

fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy. The matters pertinent to

these findings include:

(A)The class members' interests in individually controlling the prosecution

or defense of separate actions;

(B)The extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy

already begun by or against class members;

(C)The desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation of the

claims in panicular lorum: and

(D) The likely diffrculties in managing a class action.

Grinols et al v electora I college 2012, President ofthe Senate et al Petition for5TAY

Page 68: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

The members of the class are so numerous that it is impossible and impracticable

to bring all of them to this court as named plaintiffs.

Damage to Plaintifts is similar to damage of other class members.

Not certifying this legal action as a class action can lead to conllicting rulings and

judgments;

There are questions of law or fact common to the class;

The claims or defenses of the representative panies are typical of the claims or

defenses of the class; and

Plaintifti will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.

R,EQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL

Due to the fact that high level officials are Defendants in this case, and due

to high probability of pressure on the presiding judge, 7th Amendment right to jury

trial is asserted and jury determination of all issues, facts and law is demanded in

the hearing.

1. Plaintiffs have uncovered one and a half million invalid voter registrations

in the state of California

Grinolsetalvelectoralcollege2012,PresidentoftheSenateetal Petition for STAY 9

Page 69: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

2 Evidence shows that one of the leading candidates for the U.S. Presidency,

Barack Obama, is not qualified for office, as he is a citizen of lndonesia and is

using a forged birth certificate, forged Selective Service Certificate and a Social

Security number which was never assigned to him as a proof of his identity and

eligibility to the U.S. Presidency.

3. The issue of one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the voter

rolls of California represent an issue of great public importance.

According to California elections statute 2150 in order for a voter

registration to be valid, a perspective voter had to provide information in

some eight areas, such as name, address, birth date, state, where he was

born, evidence of prior voter registration and so on. PLAINTIFF'S

COU NSEL Taitz requested from the secretary of State Bowen an official

DVD of voter rolls. She forwarded this DVD to several computer analysts.

Plaintiffs are attaching as an exhibit verified affidavit of a Computer

engineer David Yun, who analyzed the voter rolls and found over one

and a half million invalid voter registrations in California, in violation of

elections statute 2150. Mr. Yun foun d 756,21.3 records without a birth

place, 685, 739 records where instead of a required na me of the state of

birth, U. S. or U.5.A was entered, 141,851 possibly duplicate records,

Grlnols et a I v electoral college 2012, Presidentofthe Senate et al Petition for STAY 10

Page 70: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

130,019 records with birth date over 100, 757 records without a birth

date,898 records without a first name. (Exhibit 11,12)Additionally,

Exhibit 1.9 shows e-malls from orange county and Los Angeles County,

where employees of the Registrar's office admit to falsification of voter

data by entering date 1900, when there is no date or entering USA or Us

when the name of the state of birth is missing. Moreover, it was reported

that the number of registered voters in California went up by over a

million since the last Presidential election in 2008 and most ofthe

increase came from on line registration. The problem with this, is that

nobody checks voter lDs, when one registers on line, Secretary of State

Bowen issued directives, where attendants at precincts are not allowed

to check identifications at the precincts, can lead to even more voter

fraud, whereby the one and a half million invalid voter registrations

might be only a tip of the iceberg

4. An issue of legitimacy to the U.S. Presidency of Barack Obama, citizen of

lndonesia usurping the U.S. Presidency with the aid of forged lDs and a

stolen Social Security number, which was never assigned to him, is the

number one issue in the natlon in terms of its' importance.

Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, Preside nt of the senate et al PetitionforSTAY 11

Page 71: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

5. According to Article 1, section 2 ofthe U.S. Constitution U.S. President is

supposed to be a natural born U.5. citizen

6. Millions of U.S. citizens wrote to their elected officials and Secretaries of

State seeking confirmation of Obama's eligibility.

On April 27,2011 just 4 days prior to scheduled hearing

in the gth Circuit Court of Appeals of a challenge Keves. Barnett et al v Obama 09-

56a27 and 10-55084. brought by under signed counsel, Obama released, what he

claimed a copy of his original birth certificate. Within hours there was a

mou nta in of evidence to show that the a lleged copy of the birth certificate was a

computer generated forgery, not a document created with a typewriter in 1961.

Evidence will be discussed later.

7. ln the last four years hundreds of desperate U.S. citizens filed legal

actions in state and federal courts challenging Obama's legitimacy for the

U.5. Presidency. As of now there was a systemic and egregious denial of

7th amendment right to a jury trial on this issue of paramount importance

to the nation. There was a systemic jury nullification. Judges presiding in

Obama's eligibility challenges routinely dismissed the cases based on

technicalities. As of today not one single judge in the nation of 314

Grinolsetalvelectoralcollege20l2,PresidentoftheSenateetal PetitionforSTAY 12

Page 72: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

million people saw any original ldentification papers for Obama. Obama's

original birth certificate is sealed, original application for Selective Service

was never found and supposedly destroyed, his mothe/s passport

records prior to 1.965 are claimed to be destroyed, immigration records

for August 1961 are missing from National Archives, his college records

that could show citizenship in application and registration are sealed,

Student Clearing House shows him only 9 months in Columbia instead of

claimed 2 years, E-verify and SSNVS show that he is using in his tax

returns a Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-2225 which was

never assigned to him.

8. After four years and hundreds of legal actions not one single judge or

jury in the nation has seen the original application to the Social Security

by Obama and ruled that he has a valid Social security number, not one

single judge or jury saw a n origina I birth certificate for Obama and ru led

it to be genuine. The level of lawlessness and corruption in the highest

echelons of power in relation to Obama's forged IDs exceeded the

Watergate by far.

9. Evidence of fraud and forgery in Obama's records is as follows:

Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, President ofthe Senate et al petjtion forSTAY 13

Page 73: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

10. Barack Hussein Obama (Hereinafter Obama) never provided any valid

documentary evidence of his natural bom status, which is requircd fbr one

to be a candidate for the U.S. Presidency according to the Article 2,

section I of the U.S. Constitution.

11. Obama placed his candidacy on the ballot claiming to be a natural-bom

citizen based on forged identiflcation papers. Exhibit 8 Allidavit of

Ronald J. Polland PhD states "With my experience and specialization

in digital and film imaging, my findings are conclusive, as outlined in

exhibit "1", that the PDF image submitted to the public by its posting

on the White House website is a fabricated forgery created with the

intention to defraud and disenfranchise the American People into

trelieving that Barack Obama was a legal U.S. citizen and a fully

qualifred candidate for President."

12. A natural bom citizen would be expected to have valid U.S. identification

papers, such as a valid long lbrm birth certificate and a valid Social

Security number, lawfully obtained by presenting a valid birth certificate

to the Social Security Administration and which can be verified through

ofhcial U.S. Social Security verification services, such as E-Verify and

SSNVS.

Grinols et al v electoral college 2012, President of the Senate et al Petition for STAY 14

Page 74: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

13. The most glaring evidence of Obama's lack of natural bom status and

legitimacy lbr the US Presidency, is Obama's lack of most basic valid

identification papers, such as a valid Social Security Number ("SSN") and

his use of a liaudulently obtained Social Security Number from the state

of Connecticut, a state where he never resided, and which was never

assigned to him according in part to SSN verification systems "E-Verify"

and SSNVS. (Exhibit 7, l0 to Affidavit of elections challenge-a{fidavit

of Linda Jordan and printout from E-Verify and SSNVS, showing

that Connecticut Social Security used by Obama, was never assigned

to him)

14. Reports from licensed investigator Susan Daniels ("Danicls") show

that for most of his life Obama used a Connecticut Social Security

Number xxx-xx-4425 issued in 1977, even though he was never a

resident of the State of Connecticut. ln 1977 Social Security numbers

were assigned according to the state where the Social Security

applications were submitted. The first three digits of the Social Security

number assigned prior to 2011 signified a state, where an individual

applied for his SSN and where it was issued. Obama is using a SSN

starting with 042, which signifies the state of CT. In 1977 Obama was

nowhere near Connecticut, but rather a young student at the Punahoa

crinolsetalvelectoralcollege2012,Presidentofthesenateetal PetitionforSTAY 15

Page 75: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

school in Hawaii, where he resided. (Exhibit 15, Sworn Affidavit of

Susan Daniels, att€sting to the fact that Obama is fraudulently using a

Connecticut Social Security number, which was nev€r assigned to

him)

15. Additionally, according to the review performed by licensed investigxtors

Sankey and Daniels, and as publicly available, national databases revealed

another bifth date associated with this number, a bifih date of 1890. In or

arowi 1976-71, due to changes in the Social Security Administmtion,

many elderly individuals who never had Social Security numbers before,

had to apply for their Social Security numbers fbr the fust time in order to

obtain Social Security Benefits. It appears that the number in question was

assigned to an elderly individual in Connecticut around March of 1977.

The death of this elderly individual was never repofted, and from around

1980 this number was fraudulently assumed by Barack Obama. (See

Exhibit 15 atturched hereto, Affidavit of Susan Daniels.)

16. Scnior Deportation Officer fiom the Department of Homeland

Security ("DHS"), Mr. John Sampson ("Sampson") provided an afhdavit

attesting to the f'act that indeed, according to national databases, Obama is

using a Connecticut SSN even though there is no reasonable justification

or explanation for such use by one who resided in Hawaii in and around

Grinols et alv electoral colleee 2012, President of the Senate el al Petition for STAY

Page 76: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

the time the Social Security number in question was issued. (Sez

Declaration of elections chalLenge, Exhibit 9, Affidavit of senior

Deportution officer John Scunpson, attesting to.frqu(l in Obama's SSN)

17. In 2010 Obama posted online on WhiteHouse.gov his 2009 tax

retums. He originally did not "flatten" the PDF file thereof, so all the

layers of modilication of the file became visible to the public. One of the

pages contained Obama's full SSN xxx-xx-4425. Taitz received an

affidavit from Adobe Illustrator program expert Mr. Felicito Papa

("Papa") attesting to the fact that the tax retums initially posted by Obama

contained the full Connecticut SSN xxx xx-4425. While the file was later

"flattened" and the SSN can no longer be seen, thousands of U.S. Citizens

and individuals around the world were able to obtain the original file with

the full SSN. (See Alfrdavit of Elections Challenge Exhibit 6 attached

hereto, Affidavit of Felicito Papa.)

18. Taitz received an affidavit from a witness Linda Jordan (Hereinafter

"Jordan"), who ran an E-verify check for the aforementioned Social

Security number, which was posted by Obama on line as his number.

According to E-Verify, there is no match between Obama's name and

the SSN he used on his tax returns and Selective Service application.

(See Af{idavit of elections challenge, Exhibit 7 attached hereto,

Grinols et al v electoral college 2012, President of the Senate et al Petition for STAY 77

Page 77: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Affidavit from Linda Jordan). Obama's close associate, William Ayers,

in his book Fugirive Days, admitted to creating over a hundred fraudulent

Social Security Numbers using names of deceased inlants who did not get

their Social Security numbers before their deaths. As he states in Fugitive

Days, "After the Baltimore fiasco, stealing ID was forbidden. Instead we

began to build lD sets around documents as tlimsy as a lishing license or a

laminated card available in a Times Square novelty shop called ' Official

ID." We soon figured out that the deepest and most foolproof ID had a

govemment-issued Social Security card at its heart, and the best source of

those were dead-baby birth certificates. I spent impious days over the next

several months tramping through rural cemeteries in Iowa and Wisconsin,

Illinois and Norlh Dakota, searching for those sad little markers of people

bom between 1940 and 1950 who had died between 1945 and 1955. The

numbers were surprising: two in one graveyard, a cluster of fourteen in

another. Those poor souls had typically been issued binh certiticates-

available to us at any county courthouse for a couple of bucks and a

simple form with information I could copy tiom the death arnouncement

at the archive of the local paper-but they had never applied fbr a Social

Security card. Collecting those birth certificates became a small industry,

and within a year we had over a hundred. For years I was a paper-made

Grinolsetalvelectoralcolle8e2Ol2,PresidentoftheSenateetal PetitionforSTAY 18

Page 78: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Joseph Brown, and then an Anthony Lee, remarkably durable identities.

My on-paper ofhcial residences: a transient hotel in San Francisco and a

warehouse in New York." Willitun Ayers, Fugitit:e Days. Association and

close tiiendship with Ayers is an additional indication and circumstantial

evidence of Social Security fraud by Obama, nnd his lack of valid

identification documents to prove not only natural bom status, bul any

status .lor that matter. Additionally, two of Obama's rclatives, his aunt and

uncle, who came from Kenya and are residing in the U.S. illegally, were

able to obtains illegally Social Security numbers, which they are using to

get housing and employment, therefore there is a pattem of Obama's close

associates and family member either manufacturing fraudulent Social

Security cards and /or usin-g fraudulent Social Security cards.

20.For nearly three years after his inauguration Obama refused to provide to the

public his long form bifth certiticate. On April 27,2011, when Obama posted

his alleged long lbrm birth certificate online, just as with his tax retums, he

originally did not flatten the file, which mcans that anyone with an Adobe

Illustrator program on his computer could see layers of alterations in this

alleged "birth certificate" which looked like a complete fraud and hoax.

Multiple long form birth certiflcates from 196l are available. In those years

green sat'ety paper was not available and was not used. Other bifih cefiit'icates,

Grinols et a v electoral college 2012, President of the senate et al Petition for STAY 19

Page 79: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

as one for Susan Nordyke, bom the next day on August 5, 1961, in the same

hospital, and signed by the registrar on August 11, 1961, show white paper with

yellow aging stains, clear borders, raised seal and a lower serial number.

(Exhibit 20) Obama's alleged birth certificate is on a safety paper, which was

not used in 1961, docs not have a clcar paper, no raised seal, and the serial

number is higher than the numbers issued later by the same Registrar. S€e

Exhibit 21. In July of 2012 Sheriff Joe Aryaio of Maricopa County, Arizona

released results of his 6 months investigation. Arpaio released a swom affidavit,

attesting to the fact that Obama's alleged bifih certificate posted by Obama on

line represents a computer generated forgery, additionally he found Obama's

Selective service certificate and Social security card to be forged. (See Affidavit

of elections challenge Exhibit 18 Afidavit of Sheriff Joseph Arpaio attesting to

for-sery in Obama's birrh certificate, Selective service certificate and Social

Security number ). Similady, invesdgator Michael Zullo of Maricopa county,

AZ provided a 16 page affidavit (Exhibit 2.A) where he attests to tbrgery in

Obama's IDs and systematic obstruction of Justice and evasion of law

enforcement by corrupt govemmental officials who are compJicit in this cover

up.

2l- According to the affidavit from Adobe Illustrator expert Papa

(Affidavit of elections challenge Exhibit 5 affidavit of Felicito Papa

Grinols et al v electoral college 2012, President ofthe Senate et al Petition for STAY 20

Page 80: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

attesting to forgery in Obama's birth certificate), the released image

digital file showed layers of alteration of the alleged birth certificate. It

showed a signature of Obama's mother, Stanley Ann D. Soetoro (hcr married

name by her second husband), where it looks as though "Soetoro" was

erased, whiten out and computer graphics used to add "unham Obama" and a

signature "Stanley Ann Dunham Obama" was created by pasting and filling

the blanks with computer graphics.

22. An affidavit from an elections clerk in Honolulu, Hawaii Tim Adams, who

checked in both Honolulu hospitals and there are no birth records for Barack

Obama in either of them. (Election challenge Exhibit 4 affidavit of Timothy

Adams)

23. Taitz received an affidavit from scanning machines expert Douglas Vogt.

("Vogt") (See ffidavit o;f Elections chalLenge Exhibit 2 hereto Affidavit of

Douglas Vogt.) vogt attests to funher evidence of fbrgery, such as diff'erent

colors of ink used. Some of the document shows as "gray scale" scanning, some

as black and white scanning, and some as color scanning. It shows difl'erent types

of letters and variations in keming, meaning some letters are encroaching into the

space of other letters which is possible only with computer graphics, not with a

typewriter used in 1961. Numerous other parameters lead to the same conclusion,

that the documcnt in question is not a copy of a 196l typewritten document, but a

Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, PresidentoftheSenateetal Petition for STAY 2I

Page 81: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

computer-generated forgery, created by cutting and pasting bits and pieces f'rom

different documents and filling in the blanks with computer graphics.

24. Affidavit of Chris Strunk (Exhibit 14) shows that in Obama's mothers

passport records received by Strunk in response to his FOIA request

submitted to the Department of State, Obama is listed under the name

Barack Obama Soebarkah. There is no evidence of Obama ever legally

changing his name.

25. Aftidavit and an attached article of typesetting expert Paul Irey (Elections

challenge exhibit 3 ) provide additional evidence of forgery in Obama's

allegcd bifth certit'icate, as difl'erent parts of the document in question are typed

using different fonts and sizes of letters and are cut and pasted from different

documents. Irey, who has 57 years of experience in typesefting, tlping, printing

and over 20 years of experience in compuler graphics, is stating that the alleged

birth certillcate is a computer generated forgery and that a document created by

typing with a typewriter cannot have different spacing between letters, keming,

different shapes and sizes of letters and a white halo around letters and lines.

26. ExhibiL l6 Cover page and page 31 of the transffipt of March 25th 2010

session of the assembly of Kenya conlain part of the speech of minister of

Grinols et alv electoral college 2012, President ofthe Senate et al Petition for STAY 22

Page 82: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Lands of Kenya, James Orengo. In his speech Orengo clearly states that

Obama was bom in Kenya and not a native U.S. citizen.

27. Exhibit 17 represents Obama's biography, which he submitted to his

literary agent Acton Dystel, which was published in 1991 and was posted

on the agency website until 2007, states "Barack Obama, first African-

American President of the Harvard Law review, was born in Kenya and

raised in Indonesia and Hawaii." In 2007, when Obama startcd to run for

the U.s. Presidency and decided that he needs to be born in the U.S. and needs

to be a natural bom U.S. citizen, the biography was scrubbed from the offrcial

web site of Acton Dystel, but was found in archives and on Wayback

machine.

28.Additionally, in his school records in Indonesia Obama is listed under the

name Soetoro and citizenship lndonesian (Affidavit of Elections challenge

Exhibit 13 Obama's registrtttion in Assissi schooL in Jqkarta Indonesia,

shotving hin using his stepfcuher's last name Soetoro &nd citizenship

Itrtlonesian ). Exhibit 1l represcnts a DVD of the swom testimony of

witnesses Papa, Jordan, Sampson, Vogt, Strunk, Daniels, Taitz attesting to

fraud and forgery in Obama's identilication records during trial Farrar et al v

Obama OSAH-SECTSTATE-CE- t2 1 5 136-60-MALIHI in the administrative

court of Georgia.

Grinolsetalvelectoralcollege20l2,PresidentoftheSenateetal PetitionforSTAY 23

Page 83: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

DECLARATORY RELIEF

Plaintiffi incorporate all prior paragraphs as if fully pled herein

29. All of the above evidence showed Obama to be using forged

Identification papers and a Social Security number, which was never

assigned to him. Aforementioned document show Obama's citizenship to be

Indonesian. There are no valid identification papers to show Obama to be a

natural bom U.S. citizen.

30. Obama is running fbr the U.S. Presidency in 2012 election comrnitting

fraud, claiming to be a natural born U.S. citizen, and using forged and

lraudulently obtained IDs as a basis for his natural born U.S. citizen status

31. Based on the above presented evidence Plaintifs are seeKng

DECLARATORY RELIEF that candidate Obama lacks the constitutional

requirements to become the U.S. President due to the fact that Obama is not a

natural-bom citizen of United States and was placed on the ballot by virtue of

fiaud, and his use of lbrged and liaudulently obtained identification

documents-

32. Secretary of State of California and Govemor of Califomia are the state

officials, who have the ministerial duty of Presenting the Certificate of

Ascertainment to the members of the Electoral College

Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, President ofthe Senate et al PetitionforSTAY 24

Page 84: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

33. Members of the Electoral College 2012 are electors, who are required to

vote for their pledged candidates. absent a court order of STAY or

INJUNCTION the members of the electoral college will have to vote for

Obama in the jurisdictions, where he won the popular vote or they may be

subject to penalties even if they are lbrced to violate the law and violate their

oath of office to uphold the Constitution.

President of the Senate has a ministerial duty of presenting the Certificates of

Vote to the U.S. Congress.

U.S. Congress has a ministerial duty of voting to confirm or refuse to confirm

the rcsults of the Electoral College vote.

EQUITABLE RELIEF

EMERGENCY STA Y/MANDATE FOR STAY/PRELIMINARY

IN.TUNCTION

Plaintiffs incorporate all prior paragraphs as if fully pled herein.

34. Equitable remedy is warranted as economic remedy is not sufflcient.

Plaintiffs who are candidates for the U.S. President and loss of election cannot

be cured wil.h economic damages. Plaintifts, who are electors, lost their right

to participate in 2012 Electoral College. Plaintiffs are stating that they are

Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, President ofthe Senate et al Peiition for STAY 25

Page 85: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

improperly prevented from competing in the general election. Additionally,

they are alleging that Candidate Obama is improperly allowed to compete in

the general election, even though he is a foreign national, he is using a last

name, which is not legally his and he is using forged/ fraudulently obtained

identification papers as a basis of his identity. Plaintiffs have suffered and

continue to suffer an undue hardship.

35. Secretary of State will not suffer any hardship if the Petition for a Writ of

Mandamus/ stay is granted.

36.In balancing the hardships, the hardship suffered by the Plaintiffs

outweighs the non-extant hardship to the defendant.

37. Granting Petition for Writ of Mandamus/ Stay is in Public Policy, as it will

ensure integrity of elections and will protect the public from the elections

fraud.

38. Precedent of McCarthy v Briscoe 429 US l3l7,97 S Ct 10; 50 L Ed 2d

49; 1976 U.S. Lexls 4129 states that a stay can be granted by a single justice

to either add or remove a candidate.

39. Rqcqnt precedelt gf Miller v Campbell 3:10-cv-252 RRB U.S. DistrictDrovlded srmrlar relrel1'Therefore, for the reasons articulat-ed above and byDefendants

Grinols et al v electoral college 2012, President ofthe Senate et al Petition forSTAY 26

Page 86: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

in thelr Motion Lo D.ismiss for Lack of Federal

Question JurisdicLlon or in the Alternative to Abstain

at Docket 17, which Plaintiff responded to at Docket

20, this matt.er is hereby STAYED so that the parties

may lrring this dispute before the appropriate State

tribunal . The court shal1 retain jurisdiction

pursuant to Puflman and will remain available to

review any constitutional issues that may exist once

the State remedies have been exhausted, In order to

ensure that these serious StaLe law issues are resolved

prlor to cert.ification of the election, the

Court hereby condilionally GR ANTS Plaintiff's motion

to enjoin certification of the eleccion. If an action

is filed in State Court on or before Novenber 22,

2010, the results of this election sha11 not be

certified unLil the 1ega1 issues raised therein have

been fuLly and finally resolwed. " jd

Additionally, allowing Mr. Obama to be certified would violate California

Election Code Section 1203, which states "Anyone who files or submits for

filing a nomination paper or declaration of candidacy that it or any part of it

has been made falsely is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand

Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, Presidentotthe Senate etal PetitionforSTAY Z7

Page 87: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment in the state for 16 months or two or

three years or by both line and imprisonment" and California Elections

Code Section 18500 that states, "Any person who commits f raud and

person who aids or abets fraud or attempts to aid or abet fraud, in

connection with any vote cast to be cast or attempted to be cast is guilty of

a felony, punishable by imprisonment for 16 months or two or years".

Since in his official School Registration #206 from Assisi School in Jakarta

lndonesia, Obama is listed is citizen of lndonesia, not U.S. citizen,

Delendants and this court might be subject to a charge of treason by

allowing a foreign national, citizen of lndonesia, Barack Obama, aka

Barack (Barry ) Soetoro aka Barack Obama Soebarkah to usurp the U.S.

presidency and the position of Commander in Chief by virtue ol fraud and

use of lorged lDs.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Wherefore Plaintiffs respectf ully pray for:

1. Declare Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka

Barack Obama Soebarkah ineligible/illegitimate for the position of the

U.S. President due to the fact that he is not a Natural Born U.S.

citizen and that his eligibility lor office claims are based on forged and

f raudulently obtained identif ication papers.

Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, President of the Senate et al Petition forSTAY 2A

Page 88: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

2. STAY ol Presentment of CERTIFICATE OF ASCERTAINMENT by

the Governor and the Secretary of State with votes for candidate

Obama pending resolution of the issue of his legitimacy for the U.S.

Presidency in light of his lndonesian citizenship, due to the fact that

according to his mother's passport records his last name is

Soebarkah and he is seeking to become a U.S. President under a

name that is not legally his and due to his use of forged lDs,

specifically a forged birth certificate, forged Selective Service

Certificate and a fraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security

number as proof of his identity.

2. STAY of vote by the ELECTORAL COLLEGE for candidate Obama

pending resolution of the issue of his legitimacy for the U.S. Presidency in

light of his lndonesian citizenship, due to the fact that according to his

mother's passport records his last name is Soebarkah and he is seeking to

become a U.S. President under a name that is not legally his and due to his

use of forged lDs, specifically a forged birth certificate, forged Selective

Service Certificate and a fraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security

number as proof ot his identity.

Grinolset alvelectoralcollege 2012, Presidentofthe Senateet al Petition forSTAY 29

Page 89: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

3. STAY OF PRESENTMENT OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ELECTORAL

VOTE BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE for candidate Obama

pending resolution ol the issue of his legitimacy for the U.S. Presidency in

light of his lndonesian citizenship, due to the facl that according to his

mother's passpon records his last name is Soebarkah and he is seeking to

become a U.S. President under a name that is not legally his and due to his

use of forged lDs, specilically a forged birth certificate, forged Selective

Service Certificate and a f raudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security

number as proof of his identity.

4. STAY OF VOTE BY THE U.S. CONGRESS for candidate Obama

pending resolution of the issue of his legitimacy for the U.S. Presidency in

light of his Indonesian citizenship, due to the fact that according to his

mother's passport records his last name is Soebarkah and he is seeking to

become a U.S. President under a name that is not legally his and due to his

use of forged lDs, specifically a forged birth certificate, iorged Selective

Service Certificate and a lraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security

number as proof of his identity.

5. Costs, attorney's fees and any other reliel courl finds just and proper.

Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, PresidentoftheSenateetal Petition forSTAY 30

Page 90: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

I hereby certify that foregoing is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge and informed consent.

Respectf ully Submitted,

-{rz (art/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

Counsel for Plaintiffs

12.10.2012

Grinols et al v electoral college 2012, President of the Senate et al Petltion for STAY 31

Page 91: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 1

Page 92: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

)"^- E*'r*-Debra BowenSecretary ot Slate

i'

'|

:

t:

I

\d

ilx{,l

''.

CERTIFICATE OF NOMINATION

I, Oebla Bolvon, Secretary of State ot th6 State ol Californira, hsreby cerliry:

That acaording io the final olfcial retums oI lhe Prirnary Eledion h€ld on the5th day of June, 2012, and the statement oI the .*ult lhereof on fle in myofiice,

Edward. C. Noonqnwas nominalod a6 lhe America lndependent Party's c€ndidat€ for the oflic€ of

Presldent

lN WTNESS WHEREOF. I h€reonlo set my hand andaffix lhe Great Seal of the Stst6 of CelifomiE, atSacrarnento, fris 10h day ol Jtttf,2012.

:=..=--_-=,.j{

Page 93: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 2

Page 94: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

STATE OF ARIZONACounty of Maricopa

AFFIDA\TTI, the undersigned, being first duiy srvorn, do hereby state under oath and underpenatty of perjury that the followiag facts are true:

1. I am ovet the age of 18 and am a resident of Arizona The inionnaiioncontained in this affidar'it is based upon rny ol'yn personal lool!'ledge and,

if cailed as a witness, I could testit' @mpetently thereto' I am a formersworn law enforcement officer and cdminal investitator. Since 2oo7 Ihave been duly appointed by the elected Sheriff of lttaricopa Countr',Arizona, Joseph Arpaio, as the chief investigator of his Cold Case Posse.

2. Under the Arizona Constitution and ArizoDa Revised Statutes, the Shedflhas the authoritl to request assistance from a volunteer posse ("the ColdCase Posse"), a speciai five member team of experienced in'estiSatorslocated in the cou[tJ', to assist him in the execution of his duties. Theindividuallr-selected tean deputized by the Sheriff includes former policedetectives and attorneys $'ho \^rork voluntarily and at virtually no el:pense

to the taxpa,yer u'henever the Sheriffauthodz€s an investigation to add'essaDy issue as the Sheriff deems appropriate.

3. In August 2011, a Sroup ol citizens ftom the Surpise Arizona Tea Partyorganization called upon the Sheriff in his office and preseoted a petitionsigned by approximately 25o residents of Maricopa CouDty, requesting theSheriffs Department to inr€stigate 1'!'hether a doclrment posted oD theofficial irebsite ofthe white House on 27 April 2011 and purpoting on itsface to be an electronic image of the "long-form" or original Har'r'aiian

bifth certificate ofPrcsident Barack Hlssein Obama $as Senuine

4. If the image of the bidh certificate $'ere not genuine, the question mightarise u-hether Mr Obama had been born within the jurisdiction o{ theUnited states and thereby complied utth the requirement under Article ilof the U.S. Constitution tltat the President be a "natural-bor[ citizen".

S. The petitioners expressed theil concern that, until that point' no la$'enforcement agency had e\,€r gode on record as indicating that it had

i$'estigated or u'as willing to investigate whether President Obama was

eligiblt to hold his office. The petitioners said that lack of resources andjurisdictional challenges had inhibited any such in\-estigation elsewhere.

6. Sheriff Arpaio con,missioned the Cold Case Posse to undertake lheinvestigation tequested b]' the petiticjners The principai focus of theinl'estigatio[ is the electronic document on the White House website tl-latPreside.llt Obama had presented as the inage of his long-form birth

Page 95: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

certificate to the American people and to citizens of Maricopa County at aWhite House press confereDce on April 27, zorr, u'hen he had said: "Weprovided additional information today atlout t}le site of my bifth. .., Yes, infact, I was borq in Hav/aii, August 4, 1961, in ]Gpi'olani Hospital."

7. For 17 ]€als {rom 1991 until the }.ear before the Presidential election of2oo8, the annually revised biography written by Mr Obama and circulatedby his litemry agents had contaiued tie uords "Barack Obama, the firstAfrican-American President of the Harvard Law Reuieru, was born inKenya and raised in Indonesia and Halraii,"

8. The official PolftcmentarA Debates of the Kenyan National Assembly for25 March 2o1o rccords tbat Mr Orengo, the Minister for l,ands, said: "IfAmerica ... did not see itself as a multiparB' state or nation, how could ayoung man borrl here iE Keuya, who is not even a natil€ Americarr,become tle President ofAmerica?"

9. The investigation has closely examined the procedures for registlation ofbirths at the Hawaii Department of Health and various statemelts madeby ofticials of the Hawaii govemment o!€r the last fii'e J€ars in connectionr.r'ith the authentici4' of Mr Obama's birth records. We have chronicled aseries ofinconsistent and misleading representations that urious officialsof tie government of Hawaii have made since 2oo7 or the question \^'hatoriginal birth records, if any, are held by the Ha\,\aii Department of Health.

1o.In February 2or2, I rcpofted to Sheriff Arpaio that there $?s probablecause to consider that the White House image of Mr Obama's birthcertificate w'as a forgery, and specifically that it $'as not a true and accdratephotographic image of a genuine birth record, I advised tlle Sheriff thatthe forgers had probably committed two crimes: first, frauclulentlycreating a forgery tiat the White House had charactetized, knowingly orunknowingly, as ao officially-produced tovernmental birth record; andsemndly, fraudu'lently presentint to the residents of Maricopa County andto the American public at large a forgery that the White House hadrepresented as "proof positire" of President Obama's authentic 1961Hawaiian long-form bidh cetificate,

11- These conclusions were reinforced by input flom numerous exlerts iD thefie1ds of typeu.ritingJ q?esettlng, computer-geDerated documentation,forensic document analysis and Adobe computer programs, as rvell ascomparisons with aumerous other tirth rccords and expert re!'iels ofHarvaii state law and of the regulations, policies and procedures o{ theHawaii Department of Health.

Page 96: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

12. The investigation further determined that the Hawaii Department ofHealth has engaged in what the Sheriffs investigators believe is asystematic effort to hide from ia$. eDforcement and the public $&ate\.etoriginal 1961 birth records t}le Hawaii Department of Health may have inits possession. The Posse also accumulated evidence that tie Hawaiigorernment and its agencies had changed their policies and pracedures ina manner calculated to hinder our law-enforcement investigation.

13. ln furtherance of the in'estigatioo, uhich has norv contiDued for morethan a 1'ear, I have twic€ r'isited Ha&?ii within tbe last six montis. On thefiIst occasion, a Maricopa County Sheriffs Of6ce Detective and Ipresented our credentials to the ofnces of the Hawaii Department ofHealti and requested to speak to Mr Alvin Onaka, the chief registrar ofLrirths, a simulacrum of $'hose signature-stamp had appeared on theelectronic document on the White House website. We had hoped to ask MrOnaka if he rrould verifi the authenticity of tie White House releaseddocument and to reri8 th€ legitimacy of the registrar's stamp bearinS hissignature. Additionally we hoped to ask him to allol\, us, for laq'-enforcemeDt .easons, to inspect the original document and, in due course,to subject it to forensic examination.

14. Ho$€\'er, r.hen r'r'e presented our credentials at the front desk of theHa$aii Depaftment of Health, much to our amazemeDt we i{ere infortnedthat Mr Onaka does not speak to the public. we explained that \\e werethere on official busincss. Ne1'ertheless, $e $€re not permitted access tox{r Onal€.

15. At our insistence \\-e did hare an oppoftunir-v' to speak \'\,ith Depu!'Attornel' General ,Iill NagamiDe. During our meeting Ms. Nagaminereftised to veri$ the autheuticit' of the PDF file released b1- the WhiteHouse. As a natter of {act Ms. Nagamine rvou}d not provide us r^'ith anyconfimlation that the document was created b1,the Harvaii Department ofHealth.

16, Ms. Nagamine accused us of trjing to get a \,elificatioq of a birth record$ithont legal authoriB to do so, eren though the docrmeDt has beenoffeled lbr public vielr'r'ia the World Wide Web. She constantiJ evadedaDs\,\-ering e\€n question about the legitimaq'of the document bl hidingbehind State statutes.

17. we also visited the Kapi'olani Hospital, which the document on the WhiteHouse lvebsite identifies as the place o{ Mr Obarna's birth. We haddiscovered as a result of oru enquides that the hospital, at tlle rcler?nttime, had maintaiDed a separate record-keeping system b1.'r,r'hich all birthsat the hospilal \\€re recorded, This document is stored in the hospitalarchives. These archives are accessible to the public by hospital

Page 97: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

permission. We asked to see the hospital's birth records for 1961 but wereless than politely rcfused. At no time did Kapi'olani Hospital e,i'er confirmthat Mr Obama was in fact born in the hospital. Nor did thet, confirm thatthey $€re in possession of his birth records,

18, Having regard to the elaborate non-cooperation we received from the Stateof Ha\!aii, and upon close examination of the evidenoe, it is myinvestigatioral opinion, shared by the Sherif, that forgery and fraud havebeen committed in key identig records, including President Obama'slong-form birth ceftificate; his computerized short-form birth abstract; hisSelective Service Registmtion card.

19. The Cold Case Posse has also noted that Mr Obama's first L{ecutive Order,issued on his first full day as Presidentr uras to seal all of his oun pastrecords fiom public scrutiny. Documentation that is not available for MrObama includes not only his odginal birth records but also his baptismrecords, his adoption records, his kindergarten records, his Punalouschool records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia UnivelsiBrecords, his Columbia Univemity thesis, his Harr,-ard Lau. School records,his Hanard Lan' Revier-r' articles, his scholarly articles from the Unh€rsityof Chicago, his passports, his medical records, his files from his years as anIllinois State Senator, and his Illinois State Bar Association records.

20. The then Republican Governor, Linda Lingle, stated during an inten,ie\^otr Nell YorK"s WABC radio il zoo8 that in an attempt to queU the BithCedificate issue she had the Birth Certificate inspected by the state'sdircctor of health, Chiyome Fukino.

21. Lingle is quoted "So I had ml health diredor, \!ho is a phpician bybackground, go personally viera' the birth certificate in the bifth records oftie Department of Hea.lti, and we issued a nervs release at that timesaving that the president I'as, in fact, born at lGpi'olani Hospital inHonolulu, Ha\a.aii. And that's just a fact and yet people cotrtinue to call upand e-mail and want lo make it an issue and I think it's again a horribledistmction for the countr_v by those people u'ho continue this."

22.On October 31, 2oo8, Dr. Chil,ome Fukino released the folio\\'ingstatement: "There have been uumerous requests for Sen. BaEck HusseinObama's official binh ceftificate. State law (Harai'i Revised Statutes€338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons rvhodo not have a tan8ible interest in tie f.ital record. Therefore, I as Directorof Health for the State of Hawai'i, along $ith the Regisbar of VitalStatistics, $'ho has statutory autho ty to oversee and maintain these tlpeof r'ital records, har,e personally seen and verified that the Hawai'i StateDepartmert of Healtl has Serl. Obama's original birth certificate oo record

Page 98: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

in accordance with state policies and procedures. No state offlcial,including Governor l,inda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital recordbe handled in a manner different frorn any other Yital record in thepossession ofthe State of Hawai'i."

23.Months later, in,Iuly zoo9, she added another comment: "1, Dr. ChilomeFukino, Director of the Hawaii State Departrnent of Health, hare seen theoriginal r,ital records maintained on filebythe Hal'\aii State Department ofHealth veri!'ing Barack Hussein Obama was bom in Ha}aii and is anatural-bom American. I have nothing further to add to this statement ormy original statement issued in October 2ooS over eight montln ago."

Significantly, Fukino changes the wording from rieuing Sen. Obama's"original birth certificate" to having "seen the original rital recordsmaintained on file by the Ha\,r'aii State Department of Health, r'eriflingBarack Hussein Obama r,!as born in Hawaii and is a aatural-bomAmerican".

24.The Golemor of Han'aii, Mr Neil Abercrombie, has said tlnt he rtasprcsent rvhen Mr. Obama \a?s born. laler, however, he letmcted thatstatement and aci<aorviedged that he did not see Obama's parents withtheir new born son at ary hospital, although he said he remembers seeingobama as a child n'ith his parents at social events. There is no evidence tosuppod that claim. No doctor or nurse $'ho attended his birth has comefon ,iud to say so.

2s.Abercrcmbie told the Honoiulu Star Advertiser he lvas searching rvithinthe Ha\{,aii Department of Healt}r to find definitive vital records thatrvould prove Obama was born in Harvaii, because the continuing eligibilig'controvercy could hurt the prcsident's chances of re-election in 2otz.

26.Abercrombie said the bilth certificate issue uould hare "politicalimplications" for ille presidential election ''that *-e sirrply cannot have. "

2T.Abercrombie did not report to the ner^Bpaper tiat he or the HaraiiDepartment of Health had found Obama's long-form, hospital-generatedbirth certificate. The governor oDly suggested his investigations to datehad identified an r.tnspecified listing or notation of Obama's birth dratsomeone had made in the state archives-

2S.Abercrombie did not say to the newspaper that he or the IlauaiiDepartment of Health had found Obama's long-form, hospital-generatedbirth certificate. Nor did he say to the neuspaper he had personalll,seenany birth record for Obama. Tbe governor onll' suggested hisinvestigations to date had identified an tLnspecified listing or notation ofObama's birth that someooe had made in the state archives.

Page 99: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

29.'lt was actually 1^'aitten, I arn told, this is what our iavestigation isshowing, it actually exists in the archives, wdtten dois\" Abercrombiesaid.

3o.Conceivably, the 1.et-undisclosed birth record in the state archives thatAbercrcmbie said had been discov-ered may hal€ come from theglandparents registering Obama's birth, an eveot that lvould automaticallyhave triggered both the newspaper birth aanouncements and availabilityof a Certification of Li\e Bifth, even if no long-form birth certificateexisted.

31. Our iN'estigation has revealed that in 196r, as Hawaiian 1a$, then stood,Obama's grandparents, Stanley and Madel,m Dunham, could lar.fully har'emade an in-person report of a Hawaiian birth even if the infant BaractObamaJr. had been foreign-born.

32.The ne\4'spaper announcements of Mr Obama's birth do not pro\€ he wasborn in Hau'aii, since they could have been triggered by tie grandparcutsregistering the bidh as Hawaiian. Thel might then have paid for theannouncement themselves.

33. However, we hal€ learned that it was not uncommon for local ner'r'spapersto publish birth announcement paid for by individuals reporting the birthin the local paper, e\€n if the child has bom elser,vhere. If so, theregistration of an out-of-countr-v birtb as Hawaiian would have beenreported in the same way as the registration of ar in-coutrt]' birth.Neither of the r**o advertisements states that Obama was born in aparticular hospital. Both give lery limited information.

34.To date the puryorted undisclosed birth record in the state archives thatAbercrombie has clairned to har.e discovered and has described as beiag"actually uritten" has never been nrade public. Being located in the statearchives, this document should be available for inspection by the gereralpublic &ithout restraidt.

35. Frcm Aber$ombie's admission, it is legitimate to infer that this record, ifit indeed exists, $as not iD the possession of the Ha\^aii Department ofHealth, $.hich may have had no record of the in-country birth of MrObama either in hard copy form, such as lont form birth certificate,presen'ed in its l?ult as described b;- Dr. Chilome Fukino. If such adocument had existed, Abererombie rvould have had it \^'itbin minutes ofhis lequest.

Page 100: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

36.Mr Obama's long-form birth certificate $'ould have been preserved in ahard-covered bound volume along witb the other long form birthcertificates of that period. 'l his record would have been easily accessible tothe Depafimeni of H€alth upo! the Covernofs request, had it existed.

37. Dr. Chiyome Fukino also gave an intervie$ to CNN otr Aprii 26, 2011, inuhich she stated that she simply werlt i[to the vault and inspededObama's original Birth Ceftificate. Iuferentially, it should have been thateasy for Governor Abercmmbie to locate it as well.

38.This circumstance also suggests that the birth record of Mr Obama wastrot at that time recorded in ttle Department of Health's computerizeddatabase that has been in use since 2oo1.

39.1n March zorz, Sheriff Arpaio held a Press Conference durirg which heand I presented an outlire ofthose aspects of the inr€stigation tiat $ouldnot conpromise the safety of witnesses or the integrity and future couseof the investigation. At that time, we had concluded that there wasprobable cause that tbrgery and fraud had been committed in rcspect offour documents: the long-form or original birth certificate Jor Mr Obama,lr'hich contained multiple errors ald anonalies, many of them serious; theshort-form computer-genel.ated abstract of Mr Obama's btth record thatthe Democratic Party had published in zoo7, u'hich was p nted using aform of words not cunent at the relevant date; the selective-senicedocument for Mr Obama, which contained a tlvo-digit year-stamp conhar,to specifications Mitten by the Department gf Defence to the effect thatthe y'ear of issue should be expressed as four digits on tie stamp, andcontmrl to any other selective-seFice registmtion document that \^€ havebeen able to examine; and we are awEre that the social security number,rvhicb has a prefix tlrat at the date of issue was unique to connecticut eventhough Mr Obama has never rcsided in that State.

40.In an attempt to verify whether Mr Obama and his mother had arrir.ecl inthe United States at or around the aileged date of his birth, \'\€ contactedthe National Archives to obtain micrcfilms of the I-94 immigrationlandilg records for the I'ear 196r. All such records lvere and are arailabiefor the entile year 1961, except for those on iie alleged date of Mr Obama'sbirth (August 4), three dals before that date, and thrce dat's after thatdate. The Archivist and his staff did not tell us how the missing recordshad come to b€ lost, and offered no hope tiat they rvould ever come tolight.

41. After three months of further investigation, the Sheliff held a second prcssconference to announce, with nly support, tiat it was no longer a questionof probable cause: it uas no\{ certain that the document on the White

Page 101: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

House website r.vas a forgery. The Sheriff also announced that theinvestigation would continue: and it has continued ever since.

42.The purpose of holding press conferences was and is to noti!' the publicthat ao investigation is in progress, with the aim of obtaining additionalinformation that might be helpful to the in€stigato$ in reaching thetruth. As a result of both press conferences, additional material of thiskind became arailable to us.

43.Our investigation concludes that P.esident Obama's long-form birthcertificate is a computer-generated document; that it was manufacturedpiecemeal and electronically; and tiat it did not originate as a cop,v of atrue paper record from a bound volume, as claimed by the white Houseand by the Governor of Halreii and by the director of tle IlealthDepartment, cited in a press release issued April 2Z 2orr, bythe Go1€morto coincide r{ith the publication of the document on the White Housewebsite.

44. Most importantl!, tie "registmr's stamp" iD the computer-generateddocument released by the white House and posted on the White House\'\'ebsite may have been imported from another unknour: sourcedocument. The fact that tie stamp cannot har€ beeu placed on thedocument pursuant to state and federal laws is one of many indicationsthat the document is a forgery and, therefore, tiat it cannot be relied uponas verification, legal or othelwise, of the date, piace or circumstances of MrObama's bifth.

45. The Registrar's date-stamp exhibited a similar grave anomaly, allowing itto be moved about electronically u'ithin the document - which wou'ld havebeen impossible ifthe document r'\"re tfle scanned ard certified cop,v thatofhcial statements profess it to be. The Registrais signature-stamp anddate-stamp vrer.e computer-generated inages tiat 1'r'ere imported into thedocurnent. Thel' l$ere not electronic images of actual rubber-stampimprints inked by hand or machine on to a papet documetrt, Accordingly,the document on the white House wetrsite is, at a minimum, misleading tothe public in that it ha.s no legal import and cannot be relied upon as alegal document carrying the full faith and credit of the State of Ha$?ii andveriling tie date, place and other circumstances of Mr Obama's birth. Aphotograph ofthe Registmr's date-stamp is exhibited and marked "M22".

46.These and numerous other e$ors and anomalies obsened after extensiveforensic scrutiny of the electrcnic irnage downloaded from the rt!'hite

House \,vebsite were inconsistent $'ith features to be erpected h-hen apape! document is placed on the glass plate of a scanner so that it can becaptured as an electro-photographic image, or whel it is scanned and then

8

Page 102: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

processd either to enharce the clariry- of the image b]' optical chalacterrccognitiou or to reduce file-size by file-compression or oPtimization,

47. Furthering the investigation, I returned to Har ?ii for a second time. I metMr Duncar Sunahal?, t}le brother of Virginia Sunahara, an infant born inHa\ aii on August 4, 1961, the alleged date of Mr Obama's birth there. MsSunahara died the foilowing day, August 5, after breathing difiiculties.when I met Ml Sunahara he had recently applied to the Departmert ofHealth in Ha\a"ii for a copy of his deceased sister's bith certificate. Hetold me the Department had gone to $eat lengths to deny him a copy ofthe origiml long-form birth certificate that a close relative is entitled bylaw to request and the Department is obliged by lau' to supply. The ColdCase Posse is compelled to consider the question why this litde girl's 1961

long-form birth certificate \azs so disconcerting to the Hawaii Depatmentof Health that it did not wish to issue a copy to Mr Sunalam upon request

48.I obtained from Mr Sunahara a copl' of proceedings in the Circuit Court ofthe First Circuit, State of Haw?ii, iB which the Depuq Attornel' General,Ms Nagamine, appeared before Judge Rhonda Nishimura on March 8,2012, to argue that Mr Sunaham i\as Dot entided under Hau'aiian statutela\a'to see, still less obtain, a certified copy of his deceased sister's original1961 lory-form birth certifi cate.

49. During the prcceedings, the Attorney General implied that Mr Sroahara'srequest arose flom an underb'iDg interest in obtaining evidencc that mightassist iD determiring whether the document on the White House websiteis indeed a forgery- Ms Nagamine said Mr Sunahara ought to be satisfiedwith a short-form extmct of the birth record rather than a long-formprinted image of the original copy in the bound volume for 196r in the\,?ults ofthe Health Department.

so.Ms Nagamine also said that the entirc vohime of birth certificatesinferentially coDtaining not only Ms Sunahara's lon6-form original birthcertificate but also those of mins bom at about the same date had beenrcmoved to a special, secure location rdth very iimited access. I do Dotknow u'hat purpose the Depa.rtment of Health had in presening theserecords at all, unless it rl'as to sho$, them upon request to family membersand otherc - such as law enforcement - $ith a legitimate and statutor"vinterest in seeing the documents.

Er. Ms Nagamine said that accessing the original birth records nas difficuital1d expensive. Holrcver, in Dr. Chiyome Fukino's intervieg'with CNN shestated ttrat she simpl]' \a€nt into the vault and inspected Obama's originalBirth Ceftificate. I arn told by Mr Sunahara that he u'as tilling to pay anyreasonable fee to coi-el the cost. Our inr-estigation indicates that the

9

Page 103: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Health Department's fee is not great attorneys for Obama had paid grofor a certified copy and g4 for a second certified cop}. Inferentiallr,. suchsmall fees are an indication that the difficulty of consulting the aichiresand genemting certified copies is not great. And I hare come across fuftherevidence that the diiiculty of consulting the records is not very great: forthey are normally kept in bound volumes on specially-designed streh,esloown to librarians as "stacks", A picture of Mr Onala pr ling out a bookof birth records from 1972, just ni;e years after the year that is of interestto our investigation, sho$'s how small the difnculqv in consulting therecords is likely to be. 'l'he pbotograph is marked ,'MZr,,, annexed andsiSned as rclati\€ hereto.

52.The reason ufiy la.u.-enforcement investigators u,ish to examine theoriginal long-form birth cetificate of I{s Sunahara relates to the practiceof the Health Departmelt to number each birth certificate sequeatiallyu4th the last t\lo digits of the lear follo$ed by a five-digit numberincremented sequentially by a date-stamp that advanc€d the counter by 1after every stamping. At that time, approximately 48 births occurred even,day in Tlawaii. and were required to 6e registered. They \\.ere sequentjsllystamped in order ofdate ofbirth.

53, Photostat images of the long-form original birth certificates of hr.indaughterc bom to Eleanor Nordyke at Kapi'olani Hospital August 5, 1961,one day after the alleg€d bifth of Mr Obama at the same hospital, har-ebeen dm\a'n to the Cold Case posse's attention. They had been p;blished inthe Honolulu Advertiser, As a result of examiuing these images, the ColdCase Posse has reason to suspect that the sequential number on thecomputer-genented short-form abstract that the Health Departmentreleased to the family is lot the same as that rdich appears on ihe long-form original birth certificate that was issued for Ms Sunahara.

54. Examinatio[ of the birth ertificates issued to the parcnts of the Nordyketwins -show-s that their registration numbers,, 61/10637 ancl ro63g,preceded tlre number on Mr Obama's short-form and long-foimcertificates, q'hich is sholra as 6Llto64t, e\€n though he was bom a dayearlier than they r.rere. Ms Sunahara u"as born August 4, r96t, and het.certificate was stamped by the Hawaii registmr August 8, but her numberwas no8o. The table summadzes tfie position:

Name ofchild Date and time born Registered Certificate #Barack Obama

Virginia SunaharaSusan Nordl'ke

Gretchen Nordvte

AnZ 4 al T24 pmAug 4 at 9:16 pmAug 5 at 2:P pmAug S at 2:17 pm

Aug 8Aug 10

Aug 11

Aug 11

10641.

1108O

ro6371o638

l0

Page 104: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

SS. Mr Obama's birdl cedificate was registered August 8, 1961. The Nordyketlvins' birth certificate was registered August 11, 1961. Even if thesequential nurnbedng had follor,"ed the date of redstration mther tJran thedate of bidh, IVlr Obama's cedificate should have been automaticallyassigned a number lower, not higher, than the numbers allocated to thecertificates of the Nordyke hvins. Ald the Dumber currently assigned toMs Sunahara is entirely out of scquence.

56.One possible explanation for the out-of-sequence serial numbers mighthave been that several serialized piles of birth certificates n€re registeredat different hospitais. Holr'rer'er, Ms Verna K. Lee, an ofiicial respolsiblefor the recording of bifths in Honolulu in 1961, $'hen inten iebed b)' arepoter for $ nd.com, said that this $?s not the case. Ms Lee rlas the localregistrar u'ho apparently signed the documeni on the White House \^'ebsite

{it is possible that the forgers lifted her sigr'lature from anotier bidhceRificate and inserted it electronically into the computerized compilationthat is nou'on the white House \ '€bsite).

57. Ms, l€e irEs surpdsed that the numbels \,\ere out of sequence. Ms. Leemade recorded statements to a wND reporter during a phone intenierv. Ihave persolally listened to those record.ings. On the recordedconversation Ms. l,ee said that all of lhe birth certificates received in a

month $er€ ordeled chl:nologically by date and time of birth andrumbered sequentially at the end of each month. The only exception - notrelevant in the present case - 14as that binh certificates received from theislands and tiom one local out-station iir Oahuu€re grouped separately, soas not to under-represenl births outside Honolulu or unattended birlhsoccuffing at home in the 50% statistical samples b1'u'hich only evet-numbered births w'erc reported to the Federal Gor€mment as mandatedb1 r he U.S. oflir e of \ iral Statistics.

SB. Ms Lee has said that birth ceftificates ftom the hospitals ir Oaht $.ete sentdirecily to the centrzrl office of the Depa ment of llealth in Honolulu. Thebi.th cedificates rvere all numbered at the end of each monih by oneperson. lvhen Ms Lee ras asked whether there might have been mistakesiil numbering Lhe birth certificates, she insisted that they were numbetedcouectly and in sequence. The long-form o ginal certificates $ereinspected trvice for accuacy by t\i/o difierent clerks and then signed by theregistrar. The]'\rere kept together secured in a certain room until theyrere all numbered at the end of the mooth. They were not allowed tobecome out of order and they $'ere not numbered incorrectly. (lt should benoted that the Nord]*e t\4'ins werc born minutes apart and their respectivecertificate numbering uas based not only on date but on tinte as *ell. Thisindicates the clerk scrutinized the documents pr-iot to placing them inchronological order for proper numbering.) Based on Ms l€e'srepresentation, I consider it highly unlikely that a birth certificate so far

l1

Page 105: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

out of sequence as that \\,hich norv appears on Ms Sunahara's sholt-formbirth abstract could have been accepted at a registrur's of{ice managed byVema K l€e.

59.1t is also possible tlat i$,estigatorc are being misled into de!'otillgattentioD to the number on Ms Sunahara's odginal long-fom bidhcertificate, which may after all turn out to be different from that of MrObama and identical to that which appearc on her short-fom comput€rabstract. For that reason among otheE, inl€stigators would like to inspectand, in due course, forensicaily to examine the lolumes of long'formcertificates for' 1961, and specifically the long-form original birthceftificates for Mr Obama, for Ms Sunahara, and for the Nord)&e t$'ids.

60.A possibility that the investigators are constrained to bear in mind, giventhe lumercus other defects iE the document on tie White House website,is that the number on that document is Dot a genuine registation numberassigned to his birth certificate in 1961, but $as issued M'hen tie short-fonn document uas generated dur:ing the 2oo8 presidential campaign. ltis possible that the Health Department does not rlant the public to see theoriginal 196l birth r€cords because forensic examination might establisitthat the forgerc had made a mistake in assigning to the forged long-formdocument on the White House v-ebsite a number that \r'as out of sequenceand that may (or mal' not) be identical with the number on the long-formoriginal bidb certificate of Ms Sunahara. This is one reason $'hy thein!€stigatom have asked to see the original bound lolumes from thestaclG.

6r. I am additionalll concerned tlat tfie Ha$aii Department of Health has notoffered any testimotry that the modern computedzed data now used togenemte the short-form abstracts have been sa{eguarded from nurnericalor other data manipulation, Ail that the Attomey General of Hawaiioffered to the Maricopa Counq Sheriffs Office as proof that Mr Obamawas born in l{awaii uas a computer-generated list of birth rcgistutionsthat was contained in a ring-binder. Pages could easily be removed, added,or removed, altered and reinserted at .l .ill. There rvas no ler'rl of securityother than closing the rings ofthe binder holding the pages together,

62.The investigato$ have obtained an affidarit from an individual $'ho wentto the Department of Health h'hen some of the first questions r!€re b€ingraised about Mr Obama's birth certificate. That individual states that lr'heuhe first went to the main office of the Halvaii Department of Health inIlonolulu, Mr Obama's name did not appear in the computerizedregistmtion list irt the ring binder, but u,hel he went back approximatel]14 days later to re-examine tie same list he \1,as surprised to see that MrObaura's name now appeaed on it.

t2

Page 106: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

63. Notwithstanding this afiidar,it, it is plausible that an original birth recordfor Mr Obama exists in Harvaii. Our investigation has discovered that atttrat time Haraiian law contained a specific provision that permitted aHawaiian parelt of a child born anlwhere in the wrcrld or any adultpurporting to represent that parent, the fight to register the child asHanaiian-born. It is for this reason that two e ries in the "Btths" coiumnof the local ne\{spape$ at the time do not constitute evidence that MrObama lvas born in Ha$'aii. 'l'hey are merely evidence suggesting that abirth certificate was issued for him in Harr.aii, and they tell us nothingabout whether or not he wa$ born there. In particular they do not - as theWhite House document purports to do identii/ the hospital of birth.

64.If Mr Obama had not in fact been bortr in l-Iawaii, the long-form originalbirth certificate rould not have stated that he had been born in apalticular hospital at a particular time, and would not have borne thesignatures of the attending physician and registrar. The ner,\spaper entrieslr.ould have been identical whether he had been born in Hawaii orelservhele iu the world; but the birth records rvould not have beenidentical-

65. The existence of this law permitting out-of-counhl births to be registeredas though they were Haraiian births is a further reason why the Sherifiu'ishes his forensic investgators to be gi\€n access to the original boundvolumes of birth certificates for 196r, and to be pemitted to carry outforensic scrutiny o{ the volumes and of certain individual certificates,including that of Mr Obama.

66.For these reasons, it is necessalv fol tie inl'estigators to bear in mind thepossibility that the intention of the Ha\aaii Department of Health inrefusing to allou' Mr Sunahan to have a certified copy of the originai bifihcertificate ofhis deceased sister is to conceal forgery and fraud tithin theDepadment itself.

67. The Cold Case Posse's lalv-enforcement inl'estigation into Mr Obama'sbirth certificate continueq taking account of the additional informationobtained both as a result ofthe Cold Case Posse's own enquiries and as aresult oI assistance from the public following the publication of some ofor.rr results by the Sheriff at the March and July:orz press conferences.

68.The law-enforcement inestigatioo by and on behalf o{ t}re Sheriff ofMaricopa County, Arizona, nould be greatly assisted, and could bebrought swi{lly, inexpensivd, and decisively to an end, ifthe Departhentof Health and the matragement of the Kapi'olani Hospital n€re willing toallo$' court-recognized forensic experts selected by the Shedff of MaricopaCounqy to inspect aIId forensically examine the volumes of long-form

l3

Page 107: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

origind birth certificates for 196r and the birth records kept by theKapiolaui Hospital for that yea!. It should be noted tbat forensic erpertsare tEined il1 the malagement a.nd presewation of paper records, andwould cause lo damage to the records iB the course of their forensicexamination.

Executed ltris day of

irl Maricopa County, Arizona.

2012,

Swom to and subscribed before me

this

JAME$ C JACKSON

Comm. E4ift Jun 3 Z0t5

9,- a"y tf x.-l

t4

Page 108: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

MZI

This is the photograph of Mr onaka wilhdEwirrg a bound volune of long'fofln original birh cenificaleslor 1972 riom the shcks at dre Depanment of ll€altb in Hasaii- rcfcned to in my

^tfida\it in Sndhata '.,Il.n'dr: The sourc€ ofthe photograph is an irteNiew ol Rasa Foumier with M. Onaka, enlilled (?.rird

the Reco t Straight, published at midweek.com. Novenbe. I 6. 20 I L

': i

t5

Page 109: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

MZ2

t: .i

/./ -7 -.<

This is dle image, refered to tu my atidavit in Smar'la r ti.,an. ofthc "long-foln birth certificate' fortvlr Obama, witl the regismls signarure-stanrp and, separately. rh€ legislmr's dal€-stamp mov.d &omlheir o.iginal locaiions on the 'te.tificale", l+hich are indicaled by whire ghost imag€s towards the foot oftlte green recurity pap€r on io which the fabricared documenr had bccn elec!rcnically superimpos€d. Thatthe rcgist.ar's date stamp and tie r€gist ar's tcxthignatu.e stamp were both d€ated by links to extemalobjeds imponed inlo the Obama bi.ih cedifica(e ias aho confinned by tuming on the "Links' oplion inthe "Window" m€nu in ldobe llluslator.lhe ins€l inage at top right is $e ljsl ofiinks that appears whenthat oprion is activated. Evidence thar the rwo reg;stmr sramps ar€ cxrcmal obi€cls imported inlo tle Obama''binh documcnr" can b. se€n in rhat d!€ rcgisrar's date stamp and text^ignatur€ stamp can easiiy andsepamiely be electronically uoved. rorated a! *ill. turned sideways or even upsjde-down. and repositionedanywhere on rh€ document. None ofseveral hundred software suiGs designed for the automaled optical-chancter.ecognition. i'nage cnhanc€ment. file compression. or optimization olan electro-photographicim.g€ of& o.iginal paper docum.nr that $erc studicd ed tesred by expen consuliants to the invertigarivetead lts capable ol proccssing rhe electmnic data reprcsenting the image b such a maMer as to slore thedata representing either of the two stamps on a single "lay€f' so as lo allow lhe sramps to be moved aboutarwill.

16

Date

Page 110: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

R[SELI-ER5OI:

YNDE FOBMAI SCANNEFTS

ciEaKScAi!.iEFs] EAS|DOOCIMENI LMACINC SOI IW^FE

TItEREPostroRYrMARcttrvE INDEX SYsrEMs, INC.

P.O.60xrtrll:t€:LLEVUE. WASHINGTON 93015

i42s) 643 1131t F Ax l24A) 38a 7297F.r resoonse lo thls lettei

wEB P,rCtSww.a.chiveindex com

ww whoiesalech€.kscanners com

May 10, 2()11

Affidavit

l, I)ouglas B. Vogt. anl oYer I 8 year s old, do not suller 6 om alry mcntal impairnrent, have personal

knowledge in the lollowjng and atlest undcr penally ofperjury that I have knowledge and expertisein documents, inraging, scarurers ard docunlent imaging progl?ms. Based on my kr]owledge andexpcrtise the 1bllowjng is 1r'ue arld conect

I have a unique backgrouud lor analyzing this doclrmenr. I o*,ned a l)?eseti;ng company tbr 11

years so I know typ€ and ionrr design vcry well. I cunently own Archive index Systems since 1993,

which sells all types of docunlerL scanDers worldivide and also devcloped document imagingsoliwarc (IheRepository). i know how the scanners work. I have also soid other document irnagingprogra[rs, such as Laser Fiche, Libe.!y ard Alchemy. I have sold and insialied document imagingsyslems ir1 cily and courlty govertunents! so I k[ow their plocedures with ir]1aging systelns and

cver)1hing aboui the design ol sucb pmgranrs. Tlris will be impodant in undcrstanding \,"hai has

happened $jrh Obama's Ceflificate ol LiYe Birlh.

Flgurc 1 Tiii image ol lhe Obama s Ceiliiicale ot LiveBlrih daled Algust 8, 1961, presented on TV 4/2712011

Whol I Dircovered obout OboroS Certificdte of Live Bidh dnd whv rt ito Forqery'

What the Obama administraiion released is a PDF inage that they a]e trying to Fass ofi as a

Certificate l-ivc Bilth Long F'olnl plinted on green security paper by the County llealth Depanment-

lh( lo|r' i. d crc"tea lorS, ry lor lhe fol'o$ing easons

Figure 2. A6o1he. Persons microiilmed Cediiicaie oJ LiveBirth daled Augusl I1, 1961

Page 111: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

l. Curved and no -curvcd type. lhe irlage rve are looking at *as scanncd in grayscalc and somepal1 in binar] which cannot be on the sarDe inrage. The reason I knolv this is becausc of iheshadorving along the guucr (left+and sidc). It also nearrs that the count],eFployees who did tireoiginal scanning of all thc lbnrls. did not take the individual pages out oI-die posi birdets. The

result is that alL the pages in that book display a pzrailax distorted image ol the lines alld t}.pe. Theycu&c and drop down to thc lei1. ii you look at Iirre 2 (Figure 3) on lhe fbmr that sals .9e1- you willnotice the lcttcrs drop do\{r one pixel but the typed word i,ldle does not. AIso notice the line justbclo'w rtLrle drops down 3 pixcjs.

: Phcr of Bl|igurc 3. t-inc 2 oilhc fbrnl. Baseljne dilferenccs.

The second incident ofthis parallax prnblcm is scen in line 6c Nonc of HosPilal at lllslitttliotl(figure 4)- 'Ih€ wotd

^irrn, drops do\an 2 pixels, but ihe typed hospitai name, Kupidani, does not

drop down a1 all. And again ihe linc Just below drops dorvn 2 pixels, but nol lhc name Lali.)Lrri

m-Tirmc of Horpltd

KaniolsntI

rual Etrl CNCC O:

$Gx

I{e'L

! igLrrc 4. Line 6c ai 5007o. fhe ty pewriier name of the hospital does not drop down 2 p ixels

The conclusion you musi come {o is thal the lyped in forn was superimposed over txislingoriginal Ccnificate of l-ive Birth form liorn the county. In facl, silce I lound some ol the form

hcaclings scanncd in as binary and gralscaie. $e fonn ilself is a conposite but &e person who

creareJit clid not flaltened the inage of the blatk lotm and save it as one file belore they started

piacing the typewilel text on the composile form. lhe individuaL(s) who Perpellaled fiis forgery

could not evidcnlly find a blank tbrm h ihe clcrks iinaging database, so they were lorccd to clcan up

exisling foms and overiay lhe typewriler type we see herc' The folger was also iooking force(ifi;es with the concct slattped dates and thal is why I lhink thcy used note than ol]e odginal

foml- At fi$1 I \.vondcled why the forger didn'l just lypesei thc enlire lorm lrom scratch and overlay

the type and no1 have to wotay about lhe parallax problem Then I rcmeffbered thal i!] tlle early

Page 112: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

1960s there \ves no photo0,pcselling and this ibrm was set in hot nretal tiom a iirlol)pc nrachinc.Ihc tlpe tlesign is linrcs Rorran but they cou/d nercr repljlalc Lhe exac! dcsign.-ihcy \\,crc srrckhaving to use existing forns thal lvere scar)r)cd ;n usirrg binary and gtayscalc.

2.'l'here is a rvhite haloing around all thl' tl'pe on the form. Figure 5 is an examplc ofthis. lhiseflect should nol appear on a scanncd grayscal., ilnagc. Figurc 6 is a graysc^lc iillagc scanncd in a1

240 dpi. Yor \uill |otice tbat thcrc is qo haloing cllect arorilrd thc lyne and also the sccurity patlenris seen lhroudr the typc. Figure 7 is a color itlage \r4tcre you can clearly see the secu ty green colorlhrough lhe type ancl no haloing. Figurc 8 shows a Black and 'i/hile (binary) image ofrhc samc typc.lhc i]nfor1anl thing to renlelnbcr is that yotr can ol ha\'e gralscale and binarv on lhe sane scanLrnlcss 1he image is n conlpositc. llul nleuns that dill-crent colnponents ofthc \\,bolc imagc are nrrdcuo of srrl:rllcr par(s. Figurc 9 is tLn erlargcd version ol Figurc 6 sho*iDg what grayscale letlcrsshoukl look like conrpaled to birrary.

N!n. (TrF or prllr)

BA .ACK

lri! rtl e 5 Ohrma-s lbrni l:igurc 6. ( ir:r\'-scale

:- .li.l'i] ir: ''/,1;i:,. , ,', .- lr,-lilr]!:': -11 r. \/;. i:t'i llt i. : | .:iir jl_11, (:

|islre 7. ('ohr imagc.

!!gr!oi!9llgr:!!!!i!

SECURITY PACIIVentura & S€pulvel15165 Venlura Bc!Sherman Oirfts. Ca

Figu.. 8 l];iiaij' ;nrrgc.

ir"E1

. : i ,.i -., .-. - 1 . i-,i:- :.' -

Figur'e 9. r\,r: cnhrgerj .r0rcion ofFigure 6 shorving gra)'scale t,vpe.

-;. t i!.: Oi).ima acr iilicaig is ir,n.lcd iliiir bo{h binlry :l d grayscale icttcr. \ti,;.L is.iuii nrioli,ersnroking gur that lhis ibrm is a lcrrgcry. l( appears thc lincs and sone of thc boxcs \!crc scanncdLrsirg grar';calc, brl url)' sofie ol1ir. lorni hcadirgs *cle grayscule urrd sonreljn1cs il is olly sornc

lcllcrs- figure l0 and figure 4 gi\c one cxanlple. You \\ill roiicc that tire 1/and. .r/, in Hosp;141, lirrInstitulion. /11-and again the /, and 1Jn hospital werc gra)scale images, but lhe rcsr ofthe linc isbirury ]'hc lypewrilor line belolv \a'as scanncd nr as !l binarl inr0gc. I can.rlso tell yotr lor certaintythat the lbnn ryFc \\'as scann€d in al a lowcr'rcsolulion (:200 dpi). lhisisbccauseofrhcsizeofthcpixlls on the lcttcrs !\'ere such ll)at rhe opcnings on rhc.r arrd r on the l_irst linc a.c not visiDic and

tl lled in.

fiAFiiE-or tn-tion fif ;ot-In Eofftrnl-t

rlenl l{aternity & ftmecolrigure l0 showing tl Drixlurc ofgrayscalc and binary L),pe on thc sdme lir)c.

Page 113: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Anothcl example is lorurd in frtrm box la.gia)scalc iurage ard thc resr is hirrary (Irigutcand thc rest \vas nol Lnrtilit was added.

his nanre B,IRll(l^ For sonre reason the "R" is aI l). l hal nrearls the 'R" \\'as originally on lhc 1o!tl

I igure I i. Aaother eranrple ol gralscaic a d binar),olt the santc lille.

;\nolher cxample is lhe Ce iiicale Dunrber ilscll (Figure I2). Thc last "l'- on lhc lomr is agl'al'scalc inragc hut lhc resi oi thc rrnnbcrs irre nor. 'l his is.iusl rnolher cxamplc ol it cut and past

.lob. ItaL:ionrcanswc(lonotkuowwhatthereaiCcr'lilicatenunlberisifthereevc.isone. Ihel{i arcoiher tbrln boxes tbat display tltc samc Jtaturc. boxcs: 5b, 7c, I l, lll- 16. l8lr.

AFTIAENT OF HEALT6t to6*flIrigure 12. lhe lasl'l 'is gm)'scalo- but thc rest are binary.

.1. The Sequrntial Nunber is a fraud. I n'ould ]ike you ro lcfcr back to l'igLrrcs I and 2. You willDotice that Barack Obanra was slrpposed lo havc becn bor-n on Friday at 7j24 p.nr. August 4, l96land the local regislrar acceplcd it on lircsday Augusl 8, 196l and hal)d slanrped Lhe Celljficatcnumber "61 10641." Ih.n nolics that thc otiler Ccrriiicale of Susan E. Nordyke sas borlr on

Saturday nt 2:12 p.n1. AugUSl 5, 196l and anothcr rcgistr'ar dale slamped it on August t I, but her('erlificate nurnber is "6l 10617 " Keep in nrind drere $,ould bc only o c batcs slamp Ndchjnc in theolficc so ll1c nlrmbcrs \louid all b€ Lrrique. I here canDol bc any duplicales so cvery Ce ificale hds a

unique .ellnl nunher. OhaDa s Ceflific tc would have rnost likely beel nrailcd on thc follo*ing\1,,,.J.'i.il(:".r'r! r.rri,r.i i-,1 1i,JiiLiLl.(,dr)rlrclr'.SLr\d,)i',,,"11.c.C.,ti'i;attlo"Lslikcii\\as rnailed sonretimc carlier that rveek unrl nor Jcc(flc(i unlil the I llr'hut shc hils a (lerlilicalc 4nunrbc$ lcss than Obanra s- It is inrpossrblc to ha\,e Obrnra's Cer1ificrle numbcr to be ibur rumbcrshigber rha a Certilisate rhat can)c in 3 davs laler.

l'he lacts I havc shown 1'ou in #3 al1J ii lcll nrc sclelirl li)irgs aboLrl hou'Ibis fbrgery u'as

asscnblcd. l. Sorrc person(s) jn the Hcallh Depa(mcn!, who had access 1o Lhe docun)ent irr)3tsingprogram, search the database lbr' someonc close 10 lhe actual binh date ol Obama and foLrrrd

someone near the 4rr' ol- August. They nra) ha\,c crossed refercnced thc dcalh daldbase 1o findsomeore \!ho had died and had a bifth dale close to Obanra's. If you renlen1ber, lhe Federal

Covernnren! u,anted lhe Stales lo cross relerencc the biflh and dcath dalabascs so thc database wouldhu\.e iliai irformation.2. ihedalc stamps have lwo difi'erent colors and sizes (see #5 belos) whichindicates thal bolh dalcs came lionr differenl Cerlilicatcs. f. More Ihan onc pcrcon is involvcd in thc

llawaii Departnlent of l-lealth 10 assemble lhe clilfercnt componcnts that were used, do thc dalabase

searches 1() llnd the right Cerlilicalcs 10 crcallr Presidcnl Obaura-s liaudulent Ceiilicale of l,jveBi|th ancl firTalty sign thc haudulcDt certiilcale I bclieve that alicr all the con)poneols rverc

Page 114: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

xssenbled they \lcrc thcn givcn lo a graphic ar'tist to aclually assenrbie lhe wlole rhllg and crearethc iinishcd li)rgcry. In short rhjs wls a conspilacy to dctiaud rhe Ljnilcd Slatcs.

5. T\io (lifirrent colors and {ont sizes in Forlh box 22 and 20 D te,4cccptcl hj Rcg. Ce ctut.what is'ery rcrcaling aboul rhi:i box ilnd date cDtry is therc rc l.no differcnt colors on both lines.Bolh lincs \!cre scaoncd using binary m,,rJe. trLrr I rec trro drltcrcrrr cL,lrrrs lFrgurc li). What I thinkrlis is shortirg us is lhat thc person who pLrL this iraud logethcr was looking ao'a fum.r that had tlrcright datc nanrcl) "August 8 i9 l." As ),ou can see thc only (hings ftar arc prinled in dark green(l{-.71. (i=92, B=7:l) ar! "Dare A'arrd "AL'C -8 6 "fhe rest ofti.tc type is in black. lIisrcilsnrelha1tIreli\r8ll\asrvor.Lingirrcolor.nxxlc'@+.

f o+Ee{-tf iln-+he-.*{d}q}*r,e+il++t+Fltil+k-is--H$f j*eB@bee" t rted bl rl1t{€i jt+,€tHeee5:a}rd si-€fl tlreloft1-:it-t€'i+i+iifle.

tur r! Ihat nrarr]rufe*lceriJe?q1"?a11fElre{l+1Mi'effrlinrpr-

29,.

iri{urc i I TNo diliercnl colors. darl grecn and black.

The same lhlng is lbLrnd in form bo\ 20 "I)ate Accepled by Local Reg." FigLr|e 14 again shou,srhal lhc drtc has 1wo ditlcrcn{ colors. I bc 'AtJ(; -tt I96 - is irr da,l{ grcen (R-.{t7, (;-l I i. I}=87) andllrc' l ' ir in blnck Yct a!ir!ir) another irrclirrabtc prool rh;sli nis a tbrgcrJ. t,olm box I7a clisplaysthc sanrc l1vo color inrage in thc rvori "None'-. thc "Non" is in ciark grcen.

lO, Ilrte Acccptcd by t+d Hcg,

Il:igulc I4. Ar;othcr cramplc ol t\!o colors on ilrc sanrc linc

6. Muitiple lsycr-s ilr the Pl)F filo tr,]m the White ltous€. I am no! thc fitst one to flnd this factan(l they deseNe thc c|cdit 1o| discovering it. What they discovcrcd is lhat whcn you of'en up thcPt)li liic in Adobc Iilustralor.rnd you luirr on lay.fs. you see a long list ol nine diliercnt tayers thatconespo d 1() diflL'reDr sccrn)ns l)1 rhc tb'nr, includine rhc signalurcs on thc fbnn. ldiscovered usingiusl ln)' Adobe Acrobxt 8 Siandarci thal I could also sco thc diJfercr)t componcnls disall)car lvhen I

cnlargcd lhc inlagc 11).iusl 40{)o1o and uscd Ihe "hand" k)ol to quicl:ly movc around *rFimali. WhtnI nrovcd thc irnngc l'asl, lhe !:rrious lypc (o rponL' rs \\ould Llisapncrr firrn rhe llmr but thc linessril}ed.jusl as I had concludcd.

A Rebutloltoine Di,<overy ofth€ Multi LoyeB Found n the PDF F&.'rhc only rcbutlal 10 lhc Dinc laycN discovcrcd in lhc PBF filc relcuscd by the White,li(nrse u'as a

Ll-tfl.rfl,1 ,ioI).r r'rn.r,lir' g',rpl-ir rrri.rs frorr. QL,cr'cr bllhr namc,'iJcaa4ldtidc lre,nblal orrApril 29. lt ryas rcporlcd b1, l:ox N$vs an on thcir web site ati

Page 115: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

LIc trics b cxcuse ihc lnulli-laycrs as mcrcly an afiilact ol an OCR (Optical Chal?ctelIiecognition) enginc and lL1en sarcd ds a PDF. lhere arc 1wo ntajor reason Le is wrorg and I knowflonr his statenrent he kllows DolbinB about OCR engines and how thcy work aid thcir c shucture.Fircl oI ali lhc Oiranla l'l)l: cedilicate was supposed lo havc corte dllectly trc111 the HealiilDeparlnents otlicc. As stated belir!, llie records they havc \\,ould have absolutely no reason to beOCRcd ard il they were :rskecl to give the customei a PDf inragc ir would be lrom fieir cxisting'flFF irlage stored in Lheir docuncnt imaging plogl-anl on the serlrer. The program wor.rld havc doneno OCR processing at lhat t!nle-

N4y qualillcalions on OCR p.ogralns are considerable. Our own document imagrng pruglanl,'fheRel)ository, has an OCR option Aom Expervision thal is celled lypcRcader. Wc i le$ated'l'ypcReadcr into our program but ro do this we bad Io sign a non-d;sclosure statcnrent wilh lheln aDdthcn we goi lhcir Took Kit arrd APL When an OCR program saves a filc as a scarchablc PDl., thellle-corlains three lnain tilcs rvithin it. fhe first file is an image file, Lrsually a conrpressed Group4'lll.F. Thc sccond filc is a ASCII lext file aud the last filc is a malir file thet contains the X and Ycoordinates ol all lhc $,o|ds in the docunreDt. lhe Stalting pojnt 1br rhe image llle and the lnallix t'ilcis usually lhe upper righi left l1and comcr of rhe imagc tlteasured in pixels. 'l he tesl llle and m^trixllles worLlct ne\/er be scen as separate iryers and thctc is cettainly no oine laye6. The threc lileswould bc in a PD|'wrapper'- ard that's all. All OCR plog|ams r-vo|k on the same prjnciple.

Thc Celrificate o1'Live Bitlh Obanra ptesentod on television on Aril 27, 201 1 is a forgery.

l. \iu.L5.\\hcr,o r. n,1cr.o,- ni- lr.rrJ :,no .e, . _) -

t^rrrrc or ro,,.:24(1t{A :>. M€Bl^,Zbbe

r. -.4CXM.i 5-,-D!ad€a.ia6t - , a Norary Public of Kins County and thc State rl1'

Washinglon afbresaid, hereby ce(ify that Douglos B. VogL pcrsonally kno$'n 1lr me 1() be thc alliariin the loregoiDg alfidavil, personally appeared before ffe lhis day and having becn by nre dulys\iorn deposcs a d say that dle lact3 sei ibrth in lbc above affidavit a|e truc {rnd cLlirecl.

$'itncss mv hanrl and c'i'ficial seal this the 1OLr' diiy

My connission Expiru' $ tJ- no ll

@WkDouglas ll. Vogt

Page 116: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 3

Page 117: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Presentation & Report by Paul lrey - Typography ancl Type Face Expert. Copy Courtesy of: protectourliberty.org

?-

I

The American TS4leurritenHow a Young Computer Graphics Person Could Not Understand How

to Use a Computer to tr'orge a Typewritten Document.It s been some 50 years since we have used tJrpe-

wdters to produce docrments. Computers have replaced the tJrpewdter slld €liven us gtes"t advaJ]-

ta€es in document prepsration. There is no need tounderst€rd the old tjrpew?iter. Except when youneed to lorge a tJapewritten docmoni.

A computer in the haDds of a youJulll€rson who

ca,D crea,t a modern forgery rs no match for the oldstyle quiikf mechanica,l tj|rEvudter. The forger whoproduced the Obaroa Hawajja,n Lon€| Iorm Hea,ltir

Depari rent Birth Ceriilicate may have tho!€htthat all tJrpesvriter tJ/peface styles wer€ alike. Toget his letters he should have asstumed tirat heneoded only to m€,tch tjrllewrilten lett€rs lomd inthe old illes of Hawaii brlth certiflcat€s to scai] ...copy a,r1d paste into his new docunent. Those o1d

fi les should be a.11 a,iike haurlg been used to producet'irth certilicat€s in i,h6 1 96 I era.

He must have und€rstood that he needed tocopy the old iype\,'dter styles a.[d would lindthem in the files_

But underst€,nding scanners -.- he also had tokrow that scanjring a letter "t" one time aind

using it a.ll over his docu'metlt wou.Id be co]al/ic-tion assured. Because sca.n lines enga€le alett€r differenuy every tille it's done. go hescanned a bunch of old bdrth cerEncates andused a diflerent "t" each time.

The mistake was that ma.Dy of the letters iDthe old fi1es were from differelt typewTiterstyles aDd that's something he did Dotrealize.-.resulti[g in maE-y type\,rfitten letters on hisforgery that did not match each other'.

I hope this helps to exptain what might havehappened with thjs documeDt.

Paul Ir€y

Page 118: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Pr$€nlation & Report by Peul lrey - lypography and Type Face Expert. Copy Courtesy ol: Protocoutl-lberly.org

CERTIFICAIt OF LIVE IIRTHit.:i,.., r5r

DCPAITAITNI O' II€AIIX61. 106t1

t,L'/rn.i\+. lrrF / l!, )

f{lljj!,1 r..Erir:-i:ii' , rr,.- ;- -' r

" r-. * r,ryl.,. s.

n"d.:.4 r-,". _r^t: I rn I r,c: I I'd_ p.*hi.rr! r rh. T.ir!.r lr(rr r4io.

0'rlt]';!J

- t+, !9ht i

I ehr

tlonol ul u, HeHali

!(a!icldnJ. !:et+rrlty A /jt'iac{logical L(,cpit6I tJ 4, .r'. J"&r.l JdHlY-B ih El

i ( ;.rl-fi-:;;i; !,llDli.r(N.rqrn(.Rll.ll{dlDt

Hcnol,$Iu

6085 lta]Fnianaole !igLH.y

f,-q" ,i i;h.; lir, F.,hrr,r ,,.,;;";;;.;;", 1.-

25 lieriYar Dest ,t-[tlce :

iii;.J5EIti 0010,t[ I'fric.-$

Alr''!l

Studeri UD-lver:s-ity

Carca sia3rt'JllBr1.l4rr r;,i7-il., r i.d;rr-.,:, - L J'd-:;;";;;rr.

Ia ' hric[ite HcDeI dr,h lhn |nr llr* d{dr.a.,h.rl!, r, rr!, hn ro.fdl.. r[! 1,, .f nr lide]na..

r k.rlr ''jn' rr{ r}tr .l!trr"- l.F .ln. -" 'r.,li. -r

>t1 '[i-&;iI'..a**- 74/

& ;r i;,r;;iiL,iH;T?

I rEFrrFY rXrC rS A rfl TE aOFYORatl9lr:^ct cG r:E nEcoFo on i{.c rltftr! ,,rv^r slnff o[pnnfr.it{i oF rrE {]

f t'(/fii

^,*Drd rt *... G.M.'

;i. r - li jl6 t-

:r. r!i&r. .{ Irhr.n fl[tr. o' ^h..nh.

7t21, ?-r

ApR 25 20r l ,3.S;. -l C-*i".^-, .' L.D.STAI€ (EGISTF"'\R

Page 119: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

presentalion & Report by Paul lrey . Typography and Type Face Expert. copy coudesy of: ProtectourLiberty.org

BARACK HUSSETi{ 084+{4, 11MaleAu gu s L /+ il9 b'.t 7 2 (+?

Ironolulu 0aitr:Kapio J-ani Mpternity & Q:pT eco).ogical IIosplta1$opolrr Iu O atru llonol ul-u ; H Swaii608 5 Kalarri an aol,e I-{i ghryal'

FABAQ]S HISSPIN qBAMA AfYic-t"in2 | t(epyqr Eas t, {{yiqa $!.u dent U4i,veg q ilySTIIILEI ANN DUNHAM Cauca.eian16Wiqhitar$4nqqs Nqng

Every typewriter typed character is assigned a number in the order it is found in the document.

Page 120: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

P.esentation & Report by Paul liey - Typog6phy and Typg Face Expe.t Copy Court ay of: Protectourlibetty.org

The nro capital l€(€rs "A"s are

liom the $ord "BiL,\CK" on the

birth certilicale found at section 8 ofthe lbflL lhere is only one lelter

betNeeo them. why then is #144

sigrlilicantly bigger than #146 ifthesame lype-\r'riler kcy struck bo$.?

Fronr Section E

BARACK143 144 145't46 147 148

146144Nolice the olher di tlerences scen in

rhe same Nord from differenr loca.

tions on the birth cedficate. AII the

letten look differenr. Why?

The t\\o capital letters "R" are from the

same $ord "BAllA(lK" as abo\'e and

the o$er Nord'BA laACK" insection I ofthe lbnn. Why then is

#3 significantly shoner and N ider than

#145 if the same typeNriter key slruck

bolh? Note also the enclosed area in

#145 is smaller than the enclosed

area in #3 even though #145

is taller.

RBsffirfte two lower case letten " s" from

the word'Ilo\pilal" in s€clion 6c

and "tlniversity" in section l2b are

sho$,n to be difrsent because ofrhe

width ofrhe lcttels. TIle lower case

*s"#88 is wider than the loiver

case "s" ir #194 as sbown with the

grccn and purple color bars shorrr

ilnder tbe lettcrs.

Irrom Section 6c

196 197 198 199 20

Thc nr.o n mbers "2" are liom

"7:24" in scction 5b ard scction l0

oIfte fofm. why then is t40significa0tly Nider thm #168?

Norice also fie dilllrence inheight ol #168. Can you imagine

ho$' these nvo lypeNritten lel(ers

\rcrc typed \,ith ihe some

typewriter?

-Page 1 of 3

Fronr Section 5b

7t2lr39 40 41Frorl Section I0

25168 169

Page 121: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

P.es€ntation & Repon by Paul lrey - lypography and Type Face Exped Copy Court$y of: Protectourlibsrty.org

Fronr Section 2Th€ lwo loNer case lettcrs "s"Aom the \!ord "lhle" fourd in

section 2 aad the Nord "Kipiola "lbund in section 6c. Notice drat the

firsl (e" #23 is not as rvid€ as #56.

Also nole the ditrcrences of lhe

shape of the enclos€d areas and the

sedfs at the top left ofboih.

e22 23 24 25From Section (,c

Kapio55 s6 Jsz sa sg

The $o lo\\,er case le$e "i" from

the r,ord *UDirersiq " in section l:band "KopiolaDi" ir scction 6c ale

shorvn to be different becausc ofthe

dots over thc letters. The dot in #199

is higher that of #5a and shows more

spacc ov€r the lett€r. Also note the

color ban indicating the diference

in width bet*eei the l€tters.

I- ronr Section l2ba Iersl-196 197 198 199 20

Fronr Seclion 6c

DioIafsz se s9 60 61

Thc l\\o capilal lerters "S" are fronr

"HtrsSf,IN" rn section 8 nd

"SlANLf,Y" in scclioD l3 ofdre

fonn. Why rh!'n is fl5r signifi-

canlly more narfow than #2011

Nolice also lhe serifdilGrences

indicated \ilh the al]oNs sho\\'ing

that the s€rifon #l5l is placed

firther back to tho lefton the "S"tha as sho\\! on #201

Fronr Section

203 204205

149 150 151 152 153 154[:ronr Section l3

-

-.--"+r ST201 202

E206

Thc two lowcl casc 'n" lellcrs

are different in siz-e. #62 found

in section 6c is much shoner than

#193 found in section l2b. This

is a goodplace to inse.t a photo

ofa typewriter key to remind us

lhat th€ impression is struck by

an engmved letter that is steel

atrd incapablc of changing sizc.

tJ

T.l closc uD ora lrotn Seclton ()ctype*rirer -! ^-f ^---a

=*r-Key floppedfor clarity ]oranl-

n62PaEe

193

2al 3

Frorn Section l2b

Univer192 193194195 196197

636261605958

Page 122: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 4

Page 123: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

AFFIDAWT

h tne Sl"le cI K€nrlcky, Couniy ol Warren, lhis atiianl b€ing duly swom, d€pos€s and says rhal he b Timoihy Les Adans,

residirg at 1132 Fairview Avenue,Apl. F, aowlng Green, KY,12101 and fial the statemenis b€low are rle coscemiog his

employmerl al lhe Ctty and couniy oi Honrlulu Elections Divjsion in Horolulu, lhwafil

1 I was emp{oyed ai ihe City and County oJ Honoluu Eiectirrs Division lrom lday 2008 thrcugh September 2008,

2. My posidln ai lhe City ard County of Honolslu Eleciions Division was S€nior Eleclions CIed.

3- My responsirilities D€re lo ove.see the activities of he Absenbe aalbt Offic€.

4. Durinq lhe cou6e oi my emplo).rnenl, I became a$Ere that ntany r€quests wete being nade lo ths City and Cottr'ty

of HonolullJ Eleclions Division, A|e Hawaji Orae of Eleclions. and the H4warl Departsnetl of Heallh trcm around lhe

country to obiain a copy ot thensenalo. Baract ObaJna's long,iont, nospital-g€neral€d bi.tit cedntcale-

5. Senior ottice€ in rhe Ciiy and Colnty ot Honol'is Els€rions Ditjsnm bH rne ofl 'nuhiple

oc.casilns lhal no Hawaii

long.ioun, hospital-generaied b'ln] cedjn€ae s&ted &r Sendor Sdna h fie rbwaji Deparnner* ot Health a.d

thqe \ras no record i.hal any suct! do.rrh€nt had ever been on n!€ h lhe Haf,dii Depa.ti€nl ot HBnh or any olher

brdnch or d€parinent oi th€ ltawait gly€mdlen!

6- Senior oifrcers in r,te Gly and Courny ol lloootulu El€diorB Oilision turdiertd me m rnuhide occasions thal Haryaii

Stale govemmenl olficials llad rnad€ inquiri€s aboul Seiator Obamal birth recods lo otrcrals at Oussns Medical

Cenler and Kap'olani lvtedicat C€nler in Honolqls :nd rhat neilher hospilat had any reco.d oi Senalor Obama he!1ng

been boft &ere. eveo thouqh covemor trbe.crombi€ has as€erted and rd.jo s Hawaji govemment otficials connnue

lo assert Baraci< Clbama" Jr. was bom a{Gprorani iledcal Cetter on &rgKrst :1, 1961 -

7 Dirjng he course oi my emdoynent, I came to underslard ihat lot polli€t rcasotts, vanous oflicjah 'n

the

govemmeni ol Haul"ii, jncluding iherFcov€rnor Linda Ungb and radolls oftrcials ol the Hawari Depattnenl oi Heailh,

includinq Dr. Chryome FuKrc, lhe dircdor of the Halaii D€p3 trn€fit ot Hoa{n, w€re maBng tepresenianons fnat

senator obarna was bom in Hawaii, even rho0gh no govenunenl olltial ir Hasaii couH nnd a longFlom bifth

ceiificate tor Ssnalo. Obama fial had be6r issued by a Halllaii ho€pitat d trle tim€ o{ his binh.

a. guring fie couEe ol my employment I k. told by senior officers ifl lhe City dd Counly ol Honolulu Eleclions

Dvision to siop inquirirg abost Senalor Obamls Hauraii binh recordq evcn though it alas common l$orviedge

affong my tetlow efiploye€s $al ro Sar.aii lon$turrl hos{ttrt g€nerared bjnh conjflcaF exist€d br S€nator Obama

ln witness shereot he has he€to set his hand and s6al.

a Nota.y ft.t lic ol !h€ Cou,rty and Slal€ aforsald, hereby cenify $'al

-L$g!\+ -" +.L-,6 personally known to m€ ro b fte atfianr in t'le for€gohg atfidavil, peBonallv app€ar€d

betore ms this day ard havinq bsen ddy s1lom deposes a.td iiys the facls set torth h th€ above attrdavit are tle and correcL

wit'ess nry band and ofticial seal ftis .?lg

day ot ll4l4h . Zf) \2

Notary Publicb siEnalure:

W commission €xpi.€s;

liy 19' E014

Page 124: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 5

Page 125: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

rmdrvii

STATI, OF FLORIDA ))ss

COLI:\iTY OF DLn A1.l

I. lclicito Ps!'a arn ovcr l8 yclrs old and r*idcm of 7579 Walden Rctd- Jaclr.<onvillc.Fl- ll24a t|Jirb FL DI- 4P10S245.45-082 0. I do rIor suffgr frotrl liy Ecqtal impqirmenland can competcntly aRcst to &c folloqirg undcr thc pcratl-v of pdrjury:

L I am a profcssioaal *eb dcv.lopcr halin8 g.adu&tcd wi6 a bachclor's dcFG: inlI er l1-l Tcr:hnierl lcfitutc in lndirnapolis, N.

:. I halc ovcr len -'-aars of cxpcrierrcc o[ e,,cb dcsign-q rfld detelqpmes( snd ha\coften uscd softl 'ar. sucb as Adobc Photoshop add Adobc lltustator.

j I dor nlo:rdcd from the oifici8J $litehouse \rcbsrrc. rt::jt1'hj1s!gu$-ar, .\F:11

fr. '01 l. rhe nc* t'irth cerlificrtc rr_ Barai:k ()barna Il:l:f; t S:. lvhii+ouric.&q] lJ;!c.jle,r-aul|;l9s r$-:!+\,qrtrIl!r!tr-cq4,jc-a!i. j9,U-tilq; liJf

J. I obs6\e.l !h3t the bir& ccnifi€rc pdf fiic cou.ld bc o1^-ncd or'.b Adobe lll'r'-tr''rt,'t,nd lhc soft\sr. reveal.d thai lhis do,:un1cnt h&s many la)ers ofinapes o:': t.

This indicalcs ftrl the dilculnmr \ris not it trre copl of fic o.iSjnal binl:ccnlficatc, bul a rccr_ntll crcrt'd doculnLrrt usrng Adobe lllufi-itclr

-i. i f'.rtlrr: ,.bsc* eC that r$is docrunctll dccs no! havc an cmtels4d scll norrnril,.

efrlrel b tir il &'Sisttats to r'rcq :o ihc tdlctrticil.'- ot golcnuoanl iisuedJr'CUmcnLs,

A1ITH NO1.

jt\l ) S!'1OR\ T() t<forc me al. AF:l :t.:0ll

\() ;RI-IC

GooFF€Y C WllLls. J8.i.lorary PulrE. Stalr ol FbdoM; iorim. sx! Jrn.24,2fi4

ComFr. ilo 0C 955m

Page 126: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

l{ar€ "-p;.\ .-

CERTI'TTTE Of

,".- :,i: ' ri; I E,

LIVI IIITHL'il.... l5r

dt^aft.axt o, ftr!:xGt 10611

:r,::) - "' ""*' c,.lt :! ,'- Atl, .r

I si:"r:'. j. e;rr :iir; li'rc.r.l, $J'-*I ;: fdntr, 5il:

^ir::. j'"l:cr: .r:rarrrt]

tr..ilL6'-'kh| ?rx:!'- ,L\a arih:;r alrcr|i.i!.r !. r r.". 14 tr,r..r,- ..-l

Page 127: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

l!

T

Page 128: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 6

Page 129: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

AFI'IDAVIT

s I At E oF F t.(Jl{DA )

rs\co{ |NTY oF DHVAL)

l. F.licilo I'ipa, anr ?ver l8 years old and rcrident of7J79 Walden Road, Jacksonville, lrl 12244 *irh FI-DL 'rP 100-lr5-45.081-lr. I do n,,r suilir ftom :iry mcnlal irDpai.m.nt and I compcten(ly ltt€st to thcfollorving undcr lh. penaliy oltLrJUry:

L l a'n a profissional seb developer having g.aduared with a bachcloas dcgree in lT |rom I ITTshnicBl lftstirur. in lndranapolis.lN. I have overlen years of cxpe.ience of in web designs andJe!!lopm(iu and I havc o{ten uscd roriavar. such ns Adobe Pholoshop and Adobe Illustraror.

I On April lJ,2010. thc whitehoce wcbsire. www.whilehouse-qo!. releas€d rhe 2009 ro.rn lMoollncome l'a\ Rerurn ofPreidenr llarack rl. Obdna:hnp. //wrv elwh irclrousc.gov/sit({/de fault/fi los/pre5ident{bama-20 I O-co.np lete-Ietum pd f.

L I downloa&d rhis65-page pdffil€on my computer. I obs4rved thatall information about rhe

prBidcnt s and rhe fi.sr lady.' s soc'al tecuriry numbcn werc redacted. All blocks or spaces forso.ialsec liry numbcrs we.c brak. o. elir*our.'

a I sLibmir Erhibir A (auached herewifi, pagc 4l pan of2oo9 fom l04o) Form 709 tJ.S Cili TaxRebm of llres. aarack Obama. Thc sprce fo. his social security numbor is redacted or blank.

5. I submit top Exhib A (attach€d hercwilh, page 49 part of 2009 Form 1040) Fo.m 709 U.S. GiftT,r Retu.rloffirst Lady Michelle Ohafla The spsce for hcr social security number is r€daclcd or

6. Then throqgh Adobe lllusiralo. so{tware,1 opened ljxhibit A and A and found thal lhese two pdffiles havc qwo lale.s .eh. norjustone laye'. whdn fie rop layer i! n med oror dragged away,th( socral securr) numbe's olborh pcrsons are revcaled

1? lsubmilL*hibirAl(aftache'lherewirhjFormT09U-S.CiftTaxRctumofPres.BarackObamaw;th his sctial sccurity numbcr revoaled. The following informarion are reveai€d:

I

l. Barack Obamas SSN- 042{E-.14252] Michelle Obarna'$ SsN 3so-6o-2Jozl. An inirial MLo otr ftesideof rorm 709.lt L l .r rnch Jark souare wrth no!. ion on rr.ll Prepa(cr's SSI\ or PIN Plrtj5709?4

El\ i6-t700600Phond no. -l l21372.0440

Page 130: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

70s Un(ed Slates Gift iand Generation-Skipplng Transler) Tax ffelurn

JA_:-\ir,

20093 !.l.r ! t5r !l !.:i! rt'rr5.r

=,,:---45=*i€5 -.a: r:L-.: i:': :

r:Li';ll3]S

^f sHtY,-:'rar;. :l l-rlf l

I

.. t :,

: t.

.t t.

i.+-*------:

:-:::-:ti

--

-= -Tt i;-'ffi

Page 131: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

.._ 709 Unrted Siaies Gt{l {and ceneralion,Stjppirg Tra.sfer) tax fiei!m

> a:: r;!r,!:e rr-,:rolt 2009I ;3r1:::a. Bt5!.Jr:t i"nrer

-,:-i+-4;-!i* a

;i: si;li:;a:r, _l .:;l :I] IE} Si}.AES_ y.s : fio

:: : . :; :, :. t -.- _ . ..,,-. i,-. ,,, .. ,. - -----_

--

z

,". > l- 7-/,i\'.3 i.r 3 -*--------;

:

J:5,..J! '

: ,.. ".-:.) I',.;..|._ ::.-- itt:at

:j.;i:;:-i i;:, !ar41,. -8].P;-ar :i.

: i :.:::riii- :

!:2

iro, * -:,'"-{ . - -

; Fiere

a 1_-f i-1L:

Page 132: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

nrleC Siaies Gifi iand Gere.alron-Skipprnq Transfer) Ta: gel!rrr

> !:. ri!?:. 1+.! ! 2009I :)rr!3r. i,r4-'r',_:.:

ini-:!! s?-1-195

I

i::r.ar&,t:r:, ! 5 :ri:'t i,*4,rLlt, ; /r4na- -,.,, :/- 7-tu

'5

i09

Page 133: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

U.lied Slales Gaft iand ceneraijcn_sktpping Trsosrer) Tax Retu..

>:.!,::ifi:. ,.:r*.n 2A0s1 :'t10' a \i\ rt t- ! :t -r-j..

t :):....::. :, ::-... .

;ilst:lt.G:ttJ, :l !)at.:

.' i:.t.::.-r"...::l:1': ,i_ i

:':l ::.!i::6::'..!:39J

.!r j'i:iE:t :.:-/s";F

-1,C1 , :"- ,)62-

, Sign

.

:.: :r:ri::r*i(:::r-:ir r(,r.,r. ;;r._ ! :l r;;_;;;::-.r,_

Page 134: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 7

Page 135: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

I l||J.l l r.l.'l.ll 1,'\e' l\\(..r .t'ltl..l,,rr,' .tlli, 'li,lrr'lll\ lrlLlltJl,r'rI1:|rrrrr rl.lr.rrL p. r's,'rrirl lrr,r',,11.:, ''r Ill( lJ.l.' lisrecl .'-1,"r 'r,rtl tl.'l:rr'crrrLler trr rr. rlt r ntl|lcrirrrr

I

L,.(\l rlr. r,r\e,lrurlr ru:rI-\Liit\:\.,t(nrt,)\.fit\ IIt. tr'r1'Lrr111.'III

,l'ri 'i .rr ri.rU.ir':rtr llOh:rrrr.r t()b.rrr.rr.r,r.l i. ,''c.rluc:r "\,rt ier'lrtin::rt.l' l'cL\\].'rr) ( )hrnral : rrirne. lrirth cliie :rrd sociili \r.!rriI\ \rntl-.cr(\\\t L. ,l\.,-cll trr.lre irr|,'rrrrrrrit r tr'f \,..irl \r.ul''l\.\rrr"r't,'lr.'li,.tlrt:t-,',r ri l, l

I ..Ai t )hrrrrrr s $clcr'l r\ t 5Lr\ r!r ReSisL'.rtirri r S\lt ) litlrn \ hich \\ ir5

.'\ .r r.rl1l. ,,,, tlrr rr.l' :rr ,:r' rr ...,r =q' .il(l Lrr)r(ri tlrr SS\ ( )l'.rrrl.r t.:'r(l ,,rr

tlr.rrl,rrr I:r su lt..rl tlr<' r'' rrltr ,)l li(ru.c(i iir\, lirirt(lr's \t lSurtl.rt.\. ...I l)..r' , l, ri rl lrr 'lrr":i I. r't ,.(j ..rr:,'r .l.t,rrt-t.:.'r"',lijc. .'l 'lrc(i(|]i lnrrIr,'l ll('r]rrlxn.l SerIrrl,\ Jolln \xrnpsorr. lh.ll rhe SS\{)lr.lrr \\nsLr\in! \'irs ll:ruLlpl.rrl Ind;or nc\ cr issud(l tLr hirlr.

Itrr\ r. r,\':.,(:Fr j{ror.r'r\l \l-r.. jr.r .. I .u :r'rJrl '.re.ul r..rrr-:t '

..:(.llr'.r\,'r,LI Nt)l,J- \\,rh ih( l.-.r. r'..1rr'.il'ilrrr rr,l .r,.lh')ril\ L lr'\"i'lgi,l.r e :L ,,t ti,r'.--.1', ,r',rrttirt:. .rrrrl e .'. ti(,r, lirr.tl (i,lr\er',)rrr: r )r: )r., . l\'rlll:..,r:,Ir.r:r,I \\\ r.rll.rcllrrr<r I \l

i

li, (l.,lr r',,,,1. \\.llr I',J l(: rl r.il,ll.r' .l,tr ,rrrl .r,,rhU|i r l':r. rc"orrtlc.l ro

, \ ,r1 rr\ r..rrl\i-

I r'e,r,l lr:rr".,r lhr. ,ci ,rtt ,tt\ ,,1 \l.Il.rr't) r I ;r( rrrl',r;. lttor. lh. ( ,'r'rrrlilt.('. ll\\.,r. .,rrtr \l.-rn. Srrl, t,'rIr' l . i orr \". i:rl \L'..r lIn lr1. I l,rrr{ Ltl

It.,i,..: 'r.':.'el .1.,r..r \:'r'. I : lr'll \lr- .rr'r:ri l-.1 th.,r .. Si\ irr

(ortj!rncLlrrl\\iihrIr.l).ri([rrtit]clocLrrrl,irl!dclcr rrilc\\ilctLlcrilpcrsoltis.r'rr. rr_r"f(. r,, \Yr\rk Lr( ir)lrr .'sirid lh,rl r11. F-\ .'rrl\ *\ l, I I 11. I hl rl','ji'\:i: rr- lt :1,'1;..lr'r.r:ct '.r.e'l .-r.r.nrti:rt.r l, \\'Llr)lrl rr(l' l('..L..Lrori.xll\ r]cril\ the enrpior rrenr.li!iLrilit) ol llrcir urrrtloleci llrclr'r r'i. r',rt ,'r lifl,r.rtr.rIr(:( ,)IIt11,i .\.'l ,rl ltrS(1 r,\.lli ed.rll .llllrl.r\-r: r't

r, .lr tJr' r,lcr'i.t. .rr,r (rrl\1 ,\rr(n i, r"ilirr ,'t rll rr.r . r'rr'1,'re, 'r'. .rr.ll. ..'r.i:,2.r 'r.ii ,'rr).rr" '.:. rir'rr.

I trrnsitl, r'c<l ru\\t I t(r Le ()tlc i'l llte ctrrIlo]ers ol lllc Prcsitlcnt ol tlrc ltniLcd

Page 136: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

.' .,

.-'

':

.'

:,;a'-.--.. /

=--

, tt ) --

- :) - . -::l a -,.t \j

:/L\-.

--c.-.:/:-. ,. I

-!-

.:!

Page 137: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

I

\r,r, .,,r.'. ...r\r,{r(r,-,rr'\'J.,r\!,ffn{ \rnrd,,r rtr

dI

Notice of l\lisrnatclr wrth Social Security A(SSA) Records

hrt\ \lr(1,..1'.('\.rtr \rllt lt.Li l\.r{,!ri.\rlrr,

\'.}s"'b

m in istratio n

I

Bnrrg lhrs norrce v'Lth you when you vrsrt SSAFor SSA Ficki O-ttrce itatf. Do not usc EV.SlaR: Sce POMS nnlOZSO.dOOtt :

4,,,ll,o,'1'.,,rr1\ i'. L ^: -, ir.t 1 ,..- L.rsi i\'? r'i f..r'N '-ict.4t\

i:r;..',,.-,r:,. 3 "..1,.:/

\,.:,r1r: :iSr./,tl'r,:!t1ll.!:llirY(j.rse V.x,i c].rl o,r N,rr:x.-'r-t__P .t< rr I I r,. c \t.t .c

I

SSN cioes not matdh. lr1. jLrrl ijacurrly Nurnbcr iSSNI enter,jcl irr Srtt(lrreck rs vald.r'r.,r'r,- .,r'( ",..,,, rl,r..,u t.rrl, -nr. jeir!.,..u!r).{chSSA.c,:o,r:

I

SSN rs invalrd. lJrg So- Jl jLCrrrry NrrrihL,r rSSNI erilerr:d 'lr seli rl'r.rck j'rar lt'.,3ir.ia,r:il,Er

SSA ('tlablc to con]firm U.S. Cit;zcnshrp UJ,,no1 c,xrt,r..!r,ni ,r,e "-r!!!,re ,j u !r lr'.' 1.)

!!,,r1 oii ru<'r iIe 55/1 i.'ci)rds dc ri.rr sl('w triai rlr.'SSN l_ldldt, .\ a tl S rlnr,'en

1. SSA rcco.d does 4ol ve,rfy. Otlrer rerson ri.\'' ) I:.....ar"i.r ir" ,.r:..:

SSA 'r"ebla

lo probcss dala. i53i)uroIns,lnij:rncyrnolnandarJIrlh,'reril)ril

Self Checd

!ila]|;i?! llfr{e ci l,lsrlr.ii':n

)).12,\e.,1.12i

attachmcnt B

Page 138: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Exhibit I

Page 139: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

OFFICE OF STATE ADMIMSTRATNTE HEI\RINGSS'I ATE OF GEORGIA

DA\'ID FARRAR

Plaintitr,

BA,RACK OBAMA,

DefeDdant.

Docket Number: OSA-H-SECSTATE-CE-r2r5r36-6o-MALIHI

AFFIDAVIT OF DR. RONALD J. POLLAND

I, Dr. Ronald J. Polland. PhD, being duly sworn, depose and say under

penalty of perjury:

'1. lam a 64 year-old, natural-born citizen ofthe United States, a

permanent resident of the State of Florida for 52 years. I am over eighteen (18)

years of age and not a party to any legal action within. lf called to do so, I would

competently testify under oath as follows:

2. ln 1978,I received my PhD in lnstructional Systems from Florida State

University with a focus area in lnstructional Media. ln 1975, I graduated from

Florida State University with a dual-program Masters Degree from the

Department of Educational Research and Design with focus areas in Statistics

and Research Methods. I have also held certifications as a School Psyc+rologist,

Mental Health Counselor, and Psychometrist. For over40 years in the fulfillment

of my professional career, I have served the citizens of the State of Floida,

many of whom are low-income families and special-needs children. I have

authored and evaluated several dozen grants that have been funded at the local,

state, and national level. I have more lhan thitty (30) of years of postdoctoral

Affid.vi1ofDr. Ronald J- Polland

Page 140: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

experience in statistical research, program evaluation, data mining, computer-

assisted instruction. and computer programming.

3. ln fulfillment of my work responsibilities performed on a daily basis, I

have become proficient in programming and operating mainftame and oJfice

computer systems along with printers, plotters, scannerc, and other automated

input and output devices. I have over twenty-five (25) years of direct work

experience in the operaiion and application of mainframe and personal

computers, laser and inkjet printers, plotters, and digitalimaging.

4. I have held posilions as a Research Consultant, Program Evaluaior,

Research Manager, Statisticai Consultant, lnstructional Designer, Computer

Programmer, and Web Developer,. I have lestified as a Statistical Expert in

Governmental hearings over the last twenty (20) years.

5. l.eceived professional training in Adobe products such as Photoshop,

lnDesign, and Acrobat, and mastered virtually all ofthe oflice software packages

produced by Microsoft. Additionally, I have also mastered the use of many other

graphics and document publishing software that were required in performance of

my work.

6- of particular relevance is the expeience I have in scanning complex

documents, especially surveys requiring handwriting and optical character

recognltion. I estimate that, in my work lile, have scanned and analyzed over

250,000 documents.

AfidryirofDr, Ronald J. Polland

Page 141: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

7. My father was a professional photographer who taught me how to use

high-end film cameras when lwas eight (8) years old. He and my mother

invented the Statmaster, a revolutionary photostatic camera that I leamed to use

and to demonstrate at trade shows. The slogan, "So easy, an eight-year old can

use iI,'was originated at these shows. !n addition to using lllm cameras for over

fifty (50)years, lhave been using digital cameras in my work requirements for

the last fifteen (15) years.

8. Given my combined work experiences and education ln research,

multimedia photographic aris, and digital reproductions, along wiih an

exceptionally keen eye for detail, as well as lhe specialized knowledge acquired

from over 2,000 hours oi direct empirical analysis and reproduction of real and

fabricated Hawaiian birth certificates, I am more than capable of visually

distinguishing beh,veen the two. No person is more experienced in detecting and

empirically reproducing anomalies in digital images and photographs of what are

alleged to be genuine Hawaiian birth certiUcates, whether these anomalies were

naturally produced or man-made, as well as deconstructing how they were

created and for whal purposes.

9. With my experience and specialization in digital and film imaging, my

findings are conclusive, as outlined in EXHIBIT "1," that the PDF image

submitted to the public by its posting on the White House websile is a fabricated

forgery created with the intention to defraud and disenfranchise the American

People into believing that Barack Obama was a legal US citizen and a fully

qualified candidate for President.

Aflidalir ofD.. Ronlld J. Polled

Page 142: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

I declare under the penalty oi periury of the laws of the United Slates' that the

foregoing is true and correct

Dale. January 19,2012Ronald J. Polland

AffidavitolDr. Ronald J. Pollmd

Page 143: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Exhibit 9

Page 144: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 9

Page 145: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Rancbo Santa ]Iargarita C-\ 92688Tel: 19{9t 683-5J11: Far (9{9) 766-7 603

E-Ma il: [email protected]

LNITED STTES DiSTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Dr Orl,v Taitz, Esquire, Pro Se,

Plaintif

Civil Action:

Barack Hussein Obama,Delendant

Aflidavit ofJohr N. SamPson

1 . My name is Johtl N. Sampson. I am over 18 years of age, am of sound mind and free ofany mefial disease or psychological impairment of any kind or condition

2. 1am a crtizen of the Uoited States of America, I am 58 years old, and was bom in

Jacksor lleights, Queens, New York and lajsed in the State ofNew Yotk

3. I am th€ ChiefExecutive Officer, Owner, and Opeatot ofCSI Consultiog and

lnvestigations LLC, a consultidg and prlvate investigative firm registeied ijth the Sectetary ofState oiColorado as a timited iiability Company pu.suant to the iaws oft.he State ofColorado

The company was formed in the Statdofcolondo on January 2' 2009 and is in good standing

with the 3ecietary of State ofColorado. Colorado does not lrale any licensing requiremeds or

provisions for privale iovestigators.

4. I have persolal lcrowledge of all of the facrs and circumstances described herein below

and trill testify in open court to all ofthe same.

5 On, or about, November 16, 2009, Orly Tai?- the attomey who is prosecuting the above

captioned matter, requested that I access LocatePlus, a commercial database that I subscribe to'

Page 146: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

6. On, or about. Nolember 16, 2009, pu.suant 10 the aforementioned request by Orly Taitz,I requested from LocatePlus, any and all legall_v obtarnable inlormation relatine to SSN 0.12i8-4425.

7. As a result of this inquiry, I came to leam that Plaintiff Banack Hussein Obamq has usedthis Social Securitl number since at least Aom Jlne l, 1986 to plesent. A detailed repo.t wasgenerated showing family relationships, past residence history, real property owred by Mr.Obama, and other detailed information to include, but not limited to, ddver's license infomahon,telephone numbers associated with Mr. Obama, and people possibly related to Mr. Obama

8. This inforrnation was obtained pursuant to a legitimate and permissible search under theuser agreement I have with LocatePlus. This reciuest was made in connectior with a pendr'ngcivil action, which is one ofthe expressed permissible purposes 10 conduct such an inquirytkough LocatePlus, as well as a possible criminal violation ofunited Slates la% and possiblefraud.

9. As a result ofthis search and the results that we.e obtained, on or about November 17,2009, I accessed a public access database named "SSN Validator" athttp://\r,'\rlv.ssnvaijdator.cor"-/. The information this site provided me i{as that SSN 042-68-4425was issued by the Social Security Administration based upon aa applicafion filed for a SocialSecunty Number in the Stale of Comecticut betw€el the years 1976 ax.d 1977 .

I 0. Based upoa ioformation and beliel Plaintiff Baflack Hussein Obama has never had adrect conlection with th€ State of Couecticut and has never claimed residency in the State ofConnecticut.

11- I am a recently retired Sgnior Deportation O{trcer ofthe United States Departrnent ofHomeland Security, Immigation alrd Customs Enforcemeot (DHS ICE) having retired onAugust 30, 2008.

12. As a result ofmy formal tainirg as an immigation officer, conducted a1 the Fede.al LawEnforcement Traimng Center (FLETC), located in Brullswick, Georgia, a,r1d advanced trainingreceived at FLETC in Artesia, New Mexico and elsewh€re du.irg my 27 year career, as \aell as

my professional experience spannirg 27 years offederal law enfotcemen! it is my knowl€dgeard belief that Social Security Numbers can orly be applied for iri the State in which theapplicant habitually resides and has thei official residence.

13. During the penod betrveen January 1, 1976 and December 31, 1977 iaclusive, it is myL-nowledge and beliefthat Barrack Hussein Obama habitually resided solely withitr the State olHawaii aod was between the ag€s of 14 and 16 during the time period stated above. During thatperiod of time, based upon information and belief, Mr. Obama resided with his maternalgrardparenls, Madel),n and Stanley Dunham ir the Stale of Hawaii.

Page 147: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

N'LA, u I 91r, requestrng that I contact hlm regarding m) account.

15. On or about Iebruary i, 2010, I telephoned N4r. Russo at 978-921 -212'l , extension 319

and inquired as to uh), he *rshed to discuss m] accolnt. At tiat time, Mr. Russo stated that

LocatePlus had notic€d I had conducted what he called a "celebrity political figure" inquiry and

wadled to knorv *ht I had done so and which permissible reason pursuant to the user agreement

t was under with LocatePlus pertained to my making my inquiry.

16. I told N{r. Russo that I lvas a private investigator in the State ofcolorado, that I had been

tasked by D.. Orly Taitz. an attomey ir California who was prosecutitrg a civil suit tnvolvirg MrObama and that I had emails and olher documentation that I could send him ved&ing lhat fact.

Mr. Russo staled that he rvor.id appreciate it if I u'ould send that idormalion to him which I did

on or about Feb.uary 3. 2010. He assured me a't that time that ifl i{ere to provide thisinforrnation to hm it er'ould rcsolve any "issues" LocatePlus may have regarding my inquiry inloa "political celeb.ify".

17 ln the email I sent to Mr. Russo, I olTered to have Dl. Taitz send him an ernail as wellconfirming the fact that I had been tasked by her to conduct this inquiry pursuant to a pending

civil suit in the United States Dlstnct Court for the Cerfral District ofcalifo.nia He stated that

he would iike to receive such an email.

18. On or about February 4, 2010, Dr. Otly Taitz, at my request, sent Mr' Russo an email

irdicatrng that she had requested me, in co lection with the pending civil suit in Califomiaagainst Mr. Obama, to corduct research through the somm€rcial databases I habitualll' use as a

private irvestigator, related to SSN 042-6811425.

19 Numerous emails have been erchanged between me atld Mi- Russo due to the fact that as

ofFebruary 2, 2010, my account with LocatePlus has been frozen and I can no longer access this

database despite the fact that I responded to their inquiries and have provided evidence to them

indicatiog that I had followed t}le user agreement lve have entered into. I have repeatedly ask€d

that my account be unlocked, unfrozen, and made avaiiable to me.

20. Despite all ofthis, as ofMatch 8, 2010, m.v accol:nt remains frozen and I aln unable toconduct legitimate, Iegal database searches in cotn€ction with my buslness As a resuit, I am

being finaloially harmed, unable to conduct legal, lar'ful, legitimale investigations pursuant to

law, and unable to p.ovids to my clients, the seryices they have contracted with me to provide,

tl,ereby sub.jecting me to possible civil litigatioo for failing to provide coni?cted seryices.

21. Based upon information and belief, misuse ofa SocEl Secunty number is a ditectviolation ofTitle 42 Uaited States Code, Seclion 408(aX?XB), which is a federal lelonypunishable under Title i8 United States Code by filre or imprisonment ofup to five yea.s, orboth.

Page 148: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

z). r nare nor DeeD comp€osated lor making this affida\it.

Further, Affiant sayeth not.

Sigaed and execLrted ia Aurora, Colorado on this 8 day of March, 2010.

)-,#-r_John N Sampsoa

Page 149: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 10

Page 150: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

tts(, - s;\ !crrrrcalron Kesulls l'ase 101 I

ii' ' r'. \r:'\!i, I tll llli ir I .: i,...i. a:,1. ,.1 r. !i ,,,.

' {ilrr Social Security Number Verification SystemlssNVs)

SSN Verifi cation Results

1

'|

0

Tlre lollowmg rab e dlsplays yo!. submrned resllls The li6t corumn rndrca€s lhe submded .ecorcveifEd laied oremp€yee € dec€ased the i6l live d€its ol the SSN wllbe.nasked for [email protected] and re@rds eilh . vertielon reslns code ot 2 3 4 or 6

VerifY More 5_SNsWhat ro do il at9SILt4!!!qvslfoFreld Offrce Locator

faired ' oala d@s nor march sociarsecuitt AdmmEt.arons Gcords select WISI to do-rlan SSN Farls io Ve.rty ror mo€,nromamn

oeceased - Dala malches sooarsec!flly adnn'stonons €cords and our.ecor6 .drcale lhatlhe pe6on E d@ased For hore nlodalon please conlad our gener.l SsA nlornalon lrnear 1{0G772J 21 3 1TOD,'TaY 1 {0+3?fi77E ) or your r@l Soc6l seco.ny feld ofic€ 56€.1Freld Oifice Locator.to 0nd lhe o(ice ne.reslyou

Vs.i6od - OaIa marches SocrelSecrily Adnrnrslratons records

-tssn:*66urE J ssssessss I MMOOYYYY

SSN not n lile lneler rssued)

Have 6 quesnont Crll ! {00-7724270 Mon - Fi 7AM to 7PM Ea$em Tnre lo sp€at wdn Employer Cuslomer SeMce polson.el ForTDDTnY €l 1 .t 00-325{n 8

htrps: s.-curc-ssa-gor'rppsl lz-'SSNVS'inleractircVcritication.d,.,

Page 151: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Exhibit 11

Page 152: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

At'PIDAVIT OF Dfl,id yur}

l-D6\1J1ur!.rmorrrI8]crrsold.ha\cpcrsonjlkno\lcdgeolthctbrcgoin:mdc nandnn!'srtothel\)ll.a\ inS:

I I hrrc orer Ir) v!'ars di conrp.Jt.r iltlirr irti()n re.hn(,log) linaivlcdse_: I ilnr rLrn?nrlt r ron:purer Inromurion S\ n,jms rnal)sr.

' I pL4itrnr dxtxh:r<. rrl(l (ompur..r rLpJir scn rc'.:s.

-.1. i M\+ ri ciiu.rlronrl backs.ound ;n conrpulcr sci!'ncc I'ron De\^ L ni\e!."ir)a il,1tn(l Irulliplc indi!iduuls. sho rc 100 !curu old. lj0ruarsold,]00!carsold-\\hoffeduritirtl\

\oI;n! in !-i1.h xnii e\cn clc.licn.,\l()|n.\'Orl] Iaik. !rhi) rvasacandidale li'rrhc ti.S Scr latc in :{j I : prinlrr) conhcrcd I nc nnd

tr!!idqd \\ilh {hc l)\ l) ol th! CA loler r.gisiruri,nrt osl ing ro anal\'?-e rhc data.I p(rs{,nali} prrioE cJ thc ffirl} sir nl thc di]l.rb.ac pror ided lo nte b} rilomc\ Orh l !iz.I liruDd nruliinlc inrguinrki.i iD rlii'o.,1aincd darahas,].

I ti,und lhe liillo\\i,rg durics:\ iil)ll rctord,\ $;lhoul fl.sl namc

h r-S7 rccords \liftout binh d.1le

( . t5.r.ll r rc,ir)rds *irhoul pla':c ol birthl) i rccLrrds r ithuur an addrcss

1.. l1l.:{61 possible duplicarc records

l . I -r0.r)t 9.rcords !\ irh hinh datc oldcr than I lio )cal5.\ccordirg ti) 4,,\ !:lccrions cod.' :150 cver! ioter r!.!isrrlrtion is supposcd ro conuin a binh d{re ol'the\{llry- a5 \ell as otircr rniormtrt'on- such ,5 sou'rt4 oforisin- tir;t and last nrme- prior voter rcsiilraltun-addr.s:J. inlbmration disclosing whcther the pc pccti!e voler js u fclon or pflrolee. a drivers lic€'rsc. hstl;ur digiG ul!hc SociJ Securitt nlmber oran idcntilier nun1bcr.

ll&sed on mt personaldala aml)sis in onl! on. otS par.rmerers ofvcriiicalioll. binh datc, thcre ar*hLlndred\ otrhousands 0f r+ran!l) inralid !der rcgiskaliuns $hich nccd kr tri rern(^ed ll1nll lhcdlldbac and i io.ol't \{)tcr r€sisurions $ilh birth dale sho'^'in-q the {oier kr bc o\cr l0O 1c'rn ol<1.

\ hic,r ir rr suspi(ious \ olcr re{islrrtion- \!hich necd Io bc \crjlied.

6.

;8

]I

l{1.

I rrrrj lhar lrll ol thc inli)rmation heacin is trut and coffcct lo lhc Ltc$ ofmv kr1o$lc'de.e. l dcclarc this

un(lLr rhc pcnaltl ofncnur!-

NatrN l)avid Yun

,\Jllrc:rs j.l(ru $ l horrron !c. :\'!,hcin. CA 9ltl0+

Sr\om ro rnd sub{ribrd befirrc nc this

d ('f .:011.

Page 153: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Exhibit 12

Page 154: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

AFFIDAVIT OF D{vid Yun

I. David Yun, arn over I8 ycars oJd, have persoDal knowledge ofde loregoing and can and attest 1o lhelolJorvirrg:

1. I have over l0 years ol compuier infbmration techoology kno\\'lcdgc.2. I am cuFenlly a Conrpuler Information Systems analysr.I I p<rfofm JulabJsc and complrter reparr sen,ices..i. i have a'l educaaional background in computer scicnce liom Devry University5. I lbund multiple irrcgula.irics in the obtaired database.

6. I lbund rnt tiple individuals. \r'ho hav€ listed rheir place ofbirrlr as US o. USA. A valid place ofbirth isrequired ir I4 srates as stated in PTF Appcndix C.pdf of Cali{bmia vorer regisrrarion guide.

h(iptl$!vw.sos.ca.govlelect;ons/voterjrivacy_finat_repoft./pTi.'Appeodix_C.pdf

7. Attomey Orly Taitz. who was a candidate fbr the U.S. Senate in 2012 pritr'Iar-v., contacted mc Andprovided a DVD ol the CA voter registrdlions asking to analyze the dula.

8. I personally perlormed the analysis olrhe daubase provided to lne by arlornet Orly 'taitz9 i found mulliple irrcgulariries in ftc obtaincd darabnsc,10. I found &e lollowing resllt/ cnlric(s):

A- 685739 Records w,here Place of tlirril is lisred as US or i-iSA_

I L According to CA Elecrions code 2150 every voter regisrrafioo is supposed to contain a bir$ dare of rlrcvoler, as rvell as other information, such as country oforigin, first and last name, prior voter regisaation,addrrss, information disclosing whether lhe peaspective voter is a fllon or parolee, a drivers license, lastfour digits of the Social Security aumbcr or an ;denrifier number.

12, Based on my personal data analysis in only onc of8 parurnelers ofvcrification, birth dat€. thcre arehundreds ofthousands oi fiagrantly invalid voier regisrEtions which need to b€ removcd from thedatabase, which is a suspicious voier registralion, which need to be verified.

i a(tes! thal all of lhe information hcrein is true and correct to the besr rfml knowledge. I declare rbisunder the p€nalty ofpeliur_v.

\lrneal /! /::^t.

Nanie-- "-DtvifYun :-

Addrcss 3400 W TI IOtu\TON AVE. ANAHlitvl- CA 92804

Sw<Jm and subscribed befbrc me lhis day

'r.''t...t 2012.

Page 155: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 13

Page 156: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

rir6 trF? r-iP'e '

:;:r !r- ir '^r r .:q)

i t:Pl-! !.t..._ir r41 !t;!r4iY J

L. rrlrj qJ

i(Ft tq -.;.rl nnf rft r,!r qt$' rc' !o t1a0

: r:iJt r 'rt,.i! rr'c q

|.6r -t-. :lirrr'ir:rL:tr 4r

't

t

:-- -/-! . rI,:;trj:\r. "r''tr i

-r=d-r. --;i7-t

.li& .- : rjlr:'rt'q 1.;:ir5l a

^* ,/tt

a

'I

€ ! !5s*-1ir-j-:erJ-**" " .. ' ,. _-:-_::: -.: - _ --^

Page 157: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

tacrsrutlot or clA4lF(xr€.20:,.1. tlE.l.!a of th. D{/t'll: narry Saatao

2. rl. plrc. ard d.ra 6f Hrth: tb.Elllu a-t-1961

r. af <lrir.nrhlo: tdomsJ.b. rh fq.la. d!5c.d&tr:c. fte .dnli 9ro!P:

a. r'l. r.lleldl: lstat. addr.cs ot rh. poptlr x.ft€llo orlu dor/ndrt6. F.6 illlch 3.t'ool (rtov.d f.Oi) rnd hher cl.rr: ???

r. r. Drl. .cc.9r.d: l-r-I'oa (J.ru:ry l. r96t)b. Grdc: I (Flrrt gll.h)

E. .. fta na of th. er.rrta x../xr,: L. sro€tro x ^

(tolo Soato.o)b. o.cLoIio./lob: (???? G.ooraolrv ????)(n.r. ol rhr .oth.r -eill onli ba !r.d if f.thr" i5 dR6.d)c. rdrfGs: x.nr.ig o.l.r a@l/nro!

c, rlF dre ol rhe ou.rdlrnr(?? rs fillcc up. ,? p.'.rnr ot thc Pupil rtr. tpt .v.ll$le, .lrt'ty ???7 ???b.(ru!. 5o!hc. thln9 )!. ocauoatlon/rob:(. fi. idd.a3s: r..l}teno orll. Roovrool

ro- Lerr rhl. r.lEl :a. ? B5 flnlth.d. ostrldc fra tlE cLrstb. ?? r..l.vrd ?? th. d:r.:c, ?? the rahool to:

11. otts iifaratid:

Page 158: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBITl4

Page 159: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

CERTIFICATION DECLARATION OFChristopher-Earl: Strunk in esse

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, hereby declare and certif under penalty ofperjury with 28USC 1746, that:

I . I am the Plai iff in the case Stunk v US DOS USDC for the Dstrict of ColumbiaDocket 08-cv-2234 seeking the passport r€lated records of Stanley Am Dunham (a.k.aS. Ann Dunham Obam4 a.k.a. S. Ann Durham Soetoro) (deceased); aod

2. I am the Petitioner in the matter ofthe Freedom oflnformation Act Request for tiepassport related records of Stanley Ann Dunham et al. with cas€ coDtrol number:200807238.

3. On or about July 30,2010,I received a traosmittal of six individual records marked Plthrough P6 showing the ftont and back ofeach for a total pages of l2 plus tie two pagecover lener ofJuly 29, 2010, and

4. T"llot on htly 29,2010 all the recods marked Pl thrcugh P6 werc de€med all thoseavailable regarding the above referenc€d matter described in the cover letter by JonathanM. Robin, Dir€ctor for the Office ofLegal Affairs and Law Enforcement Liaison Bureauof Consu.lar Afairs Passpott Services (see the aftacbed).

5. Ofparticular interest is the "Amend to Include @xclude) Childreo" entry by Stanley AnnDuoham Soetoro who subscribed to on 13 August 1968 on page 2 ofthe Documentmark€d Pl showtr in her own hand*riting crossed out to mean to exclude "BardckHussein Obama (Soebarkrh)" ftorn her passport .enewal.

6. The attached documents plus cover l€lter oftwo pages for a total 14 pages received ftomthe U.S. Depaxtuent of State associated with my request for records of Stanley ArmDunham etc. with case conaol number: 200807238.

I do hereby declare and certiry thrt the rttNchcd records are a truo atrd rccurate copy ofthose rcceived by Declerrnt rtrd thrt I am .vril&ble to testify iD open court.s such.

Dated: Brooklyo New YorkItecember f7 .2oll7

593 Vandcrbilt Avetroe - 281BrooklyD, New York 11238Cell- 8,15-9015757 email: chris@strunkws

Attrched: Coverletter (2 pages)Six (6) Docum€nts Pl thru P6 (12 pages)

Page 160: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Llrriterl Statrs [)elarlmcnl o[ Statc

ll ushint:k \ b.1.. !o;!tt

-ttL29Um

In reply refer to:C NPPf /L/LE - Case Control Number: 200807238

Christopher E. Strunk593 Vandcrbilt Avenue. #28 I

Brookiyn, NY I1238

Dear lr,1r. Strunk:

The following is in response to your request to the Department ofState, dated November 22, ?008, requesting the release of material under theprovisions ofthe Freedom of Inlormation Act (5 U.S.C. g 552).

We have compleied a search tbr recqrds responsive to your request.The search resulted in the refrieval ofsix documeDts that are responsive toyour re.quest. After carehrl review ofthese documents, we have det€rminedthat all six documents may be released in fiill.

We did not locate a 1965 passpon applicatiou referenced in anapplication for amendment ofpassport that is included in the rcleascddocuments. Many passport applications and other non-vital records {iomthat period were destroyed during the 1980s in accordance with guidancefrom the Ceneral Seftices Admrnisrration.

Passpofi reaords twically coBsist ofapplications lcr United Statespasspons and supponing evidence of United Stat€s citizenship- Passponrecords do not include evidence oftrav€l such as enfance/exit stamps, visas,residencc pemrits. etc.- since this information is entered ioto the passportbook after issuance,

Page 161: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

This completcs the processing ofyour request.

Office ofLegal Alfairs and Law Enforcement LiaisonBueau of Consular Affairs

Passport Services

Enclosures:As stated

Jonathan M. Rolbin, Director

Page 162: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

?1

APPLICATTOX FORREflEWAL I A{ErlDr{€Nl --i EXJETTSION

OF

posr :.-i:Lr,,a) :r.ion-si,.-r FeFEiFEo ro oEe^FrMExr Foi a;r,6N= .:,r ',r--Ii:\: iENE"eo,srirheE r rI I aMENoeo as HEouEsrED

s :.oo FEE .ollEcrEo-No FEe co(EcrED

t.,., ro,A dc.o,rr eo RFvFRSF.J

d ciriz.n or tn6 Unirod 5rot5, J6 h..rgt.d dhoY.. {ll.d.ndr'..i

oarEoF Erirts irltdlr, d4, @JA/a. iq,//42 /|,/tt /= ,t f"t av n sal <

C' r,.(a "l' , J,,. l-rn"=,",uFrrEo 5r^r.r ltfiloeNcc tstpt eaeE.'l.hr. ..qtr, aaet d

!

zreiie

,wr e r.ve'. cr o; ^i' oprcc,oE"r ;oi'F- {t;-: i. r",rrrd;*q 'i-' iJZ;;-.it/ d t ,

\l^/n" A,-o.,- E-,./-,,,. 9,,1.{ r{,^a)i, ,4-,RfvE yo! EVEF 5.€u R€F r€A/itor As

^ cfr:E{ oF T

N1)

/N ALF//V/+fL - ,AtAP?/ED-7-a A^./ /N D o ^,/

Es '4 4",' L/r/ ZE:A/

/1

I hay. uo. (?id io ns.r p.oon r.lu,red .n 16 !c ji.l!d.A in |h. ras$D o! Jocu.ni ion [!s). srn.r a.qunils Uiit.J S.r.s cni-:6rhi* b.<! oztqrlii.d rr ..iri:.n oi 3 lor!'6R ra.: ak.n r onh.! r.& d .ftnnRid or dhn f6mt d.d{.rio. of.I!.ie..td . lociln .sr.: <nrc.<d or savlii in

'h..,n.J f.tci3 or r roleie .rnc .cc.ar.d cr r. ;n.d rt,. dlrics or m, orti.., po.,, ;r.Fprorh.or ud6 t!. s.rc6hdr ot r ror.iF rrlc or roltrjcat rqbdilirio' rh.!.dri yoEi ii r ,.rni.ar .l.c(io, in . to..iF sr.r. or pr.d.irtr.djad.l.cijooorpl.6i3cn.!oJaltDii.(h.loe.r.irtryov.r{oi.i!.r.ri'ory:6.d.!to6!ti.nucirddcrd'..'lisanh.rid rt l:oir.d SEr.r { s.te. ! lirlomltr or dd,el{ ofii..r i)t ri. trrir.t<u..! i! r {oFia,rarq.r.r sqrnr or d.j@4 rb. b.n.-ln! ol llc.!riooaltt dl riy ro!.'s. srrr.i dr L..n coDricr.d hr. cor.o. cosr d,di3l of conF.i.driurisdic.ior ol coMirii6 riy rcr

o! p de!.y by lor*, 'n.

ananlHr u{ d. U.ncd sr.r<!,4r qr of '[. otpvens'is.d o4' 6. ondrhl' rd. 5..r o-tt F.a 6r e. @p+ k th. *.r,co-,, or b ny.rtr.. p.Eq in<r!d.c

- rA. FrrF! q doa,''ta'lat.lli?dtpnl hr tA. Net l. *o!rd !. [email protected]!de, '[k @r,.;ro..)

To b. [email protected] by fartcat) i

", .' 6t l&',a.7 5 .o4

", tl:irar',a.. Ind6ildgtd'F *' "- *'aalic.id! lor *. oar.,i.!.'. d.cisioo. is aullr 3dit{i;;

,7,t :

Slbs..ib.d dd s'o6 ,o(,Jlirnld) b.lore n. ihir

'11,:.(Tt. Orar@eo' -ill r3ru.

'drr !h. coiiqln o(tc<.ldt*r

ro,i. rrpli@r'r d.onv !oL.si: !.'."or ro rhq c6onay '

ll

f"!M Fs-299

Page 163: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

.) l*'F!l1ru!6^ror

i. o'voR.e J o!^rH

- u !. cf,z.r f:t.L!.N.cnzEr 6F

OTHER ABENDM'{T$I IOESC

tsoat z ^iox lt l. -r<d'd oDtt i6 6"n <ao. itt .cr.' r'.n.A b D*rt

- c.io o.loEi yy tl !u6x.ED r! i Eoe.'rEo

(c..'et ot t\. u.n.a Sbr.' et ^n

tt<o)

IPreb ta'nr.d lo. i,.Iati6s)

OO NOT NTR F^CE

--

g

E

b. rrprerirAklr 7rj 5r ?tl itrclE! i. riz.i

d.*!l rrpli.r wi'h r plaii,ltrhr hr.L-s.oqnJt d lE*. b.!i 6!o ti,hh ? llaE

rh.o c.n..d.o6 n. ic-crqd.d ,h(y rhe n b( sheiiF " !@u, !ho-hs'!rn. TlLl cqi5ul {ill id. r.c. plLo(oJ

ihJr < io' r aFd l'I.n:rr. Cohr rirlo-

tL nt stq'lc t @,,1 fhab ^(eh

Ii c.ffin < .s +..iric .(l'orizatioi bv ri,. n.D.na,.i' ,;rl tL. r.nunql. l^ ri.rr .i3c! rn .b. r.eDa.n t plo rc.ciFr dl ri .rj ddurn b. Eonnrcd !i,h r f,d ln o{,h. s(iad rrr.q

Page 164: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

{VCIi] iHq LA5;-lllNj-tI E nusii * tPLi.rsE T /PE 0F pnrx i S ir,'ti T PUT IT OFF

tJ0 f

, '' q:'3:P" U

It,.,t': .)

rJ

'11

)r.xlf'

*r{|lilhfii-l.lLii,

: i )t'?

:!t : !rr. rr'r a-!-i-*

'. . -.:-::-. PStl

t-r 't 5i,:,jtsrL Nirri3rati

rr., ('. ,j. , , "".,'......, "t. 1s,.if|:, . :d ..i.4'.l.4 -'.:1 ,S4.":Jr7

* -l $*-r;, rgqa.6'-i t!.,4 : ^ lu r:lrii:-i:

t .rldt - ..

t:t"'

ttr}"'#LF..t A. ptn&'$Ae6 eAvtlEPPRCPOI€O TPAVE! PL !T: jr-/$n f*a{,rit .rrupFs.i nF rFrrft* /. .r\J ! U",- Lt P

:ri.lr:fr ,Ft Tc ga vL!r1 at

./*.*p*tg g :f "r.4I ttf 4E:a:t^: a+<>

o tr. i,Biv(,i.ri rq,re iakrr:

!,iFrilr!r,lrir'rtrlnrlun.;r,{!:4iiittr;:r.rr.rt,r'iirlrq,1)-qrde.firtr;,'r.jlxrali:.]tlri.i.,'. i, {li! rii.q'ri,,5, rL,r Lvr o rLr J!rr., !/i r.. ir itr4rird,1,i,iLJr rjt1r!1.

'; -. ,

' ." . .l,llii! 111: , lr,i !i.!!2iin,l

8[alArlri ] NJ!r.inl)\rn h.!errlrr

'l:rliri rir, /rl :.r' :ilti"i:r, j: i:::,1".ir,,,11!rnilriir|\l tt-t )t |ttt

'i t\r"t'.: ni4 h.i, L,r:;'.fi,i. :r

,rr1 :\'i 1 ,.r',ii,, . ,. r'r:irl rrr.;ffi:, ]i'

Page 165: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 15

Page 166: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Dr. Orly Taitz, Attomey-at-Inw(California SBN 223433)Orly Taitz Law Offices26302l aPaz, Suite 211Mission Viejo, Califomia 92691Telephone: (949) 683-541 1

E-Mail: dr [email protected]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE CENTRAL DISTzuCT OF CALIFORMASANTA ANA (SOUTHERN) DIVISION

Captain Pamela Barnett, et al., $Plaintiffs, $

sv. $ Civil Action:

$Barack Hussein Obama, $ SACV09-00082-DOC (Anx)Michelle L.R. Obama, $

Flillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary ol Srate. $

Roberi M. Gates, Secretarl of Defense. $

Joseph R. Biden, Vice-President and $

President of the Senate, $Defendants. $

Alfidavit of Susan Daniels

l. My name is Susan Elizabeth Daniels. I am over l8 years old, am of sound

mind and free ofany menlal disease or psychological impairment oiany kind or

condition.

2. Iant a citizen ofthe United States ofAmerica, I am 68 years old and I was

born and raised in the State ofohio.

3. I am licensed by the State of Ohio as a private investigator; I am president ofDaniels and Associates Investigations, Inc., incorporated in March 1995, license

number 65199565509.

4. I have penonal knowledge ofall the facts and circumstances described herein

below and will testiry in open court to all ofthe same.

5. I located a social security number for Barack Hussein Obama and found that itwas issued betwee n 1977-1979 inthe State ofConnecticut but as I investigated

Page 167: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

firther, I found an additional eight social security numbers. One ofthe numbers had

@eceased) behind it. I was able to find the name ofthe person the SSN actuallybelonged to and printed it fiom the Social Security Administration death index.

6. I researched social securify numbers for Michelle Obama. When I ran hername, two different social security numbers appeared for her, includimg one thatdoes not belong io her but is listed for her at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington,D.C.

7. The true and correct copies I personally obtained are attached.

8. I solemnly swear under penalty ofpe{ury that all the facts stated andcircumstances described above are true and correct stalements.

9. I have not received any compensation for making this affidavit.

Further, Affiant saithSigned and executed inOctober, 2009-

^,/ .aLtt onthisll"dlyof

Elizabeth

Page 168: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

NOTARY'S JURAT

Susan hlizabeth Daniels appeared belore mE in person on this /2 da> olOcrober, 100e. i" )/-',,'f . rciryl. 4Z ' C.-1 . r 7 aUctober, zUUy, ffr / /t4'.-&.! lclry L -fr.' 42.-z- . / / a(state), U < . ,4 (country) and having presented to me herdt{ver's license and

having been swom by me duly under oath and having been admonished that she did

so under penalty of perjury, she did then and there depose herselfand give the above-

listed statements in my presence in the form ofhis written affidavit.

Specifically but without limitation, Susan Elizabeth Daniels did in my presence

authenticate the documents attached here as a true and correct copy ofthe documents

she obtained and described in her af'fidavit.

Business Address of Notary: &4 q!01 n

My Seal Appears Above this line.

My prinred Name i s:j ! "'^E-5--L!j:lit92! ; my notarial commission or

license expires on: 2-t t!.E .ri,Li ]; r.SrLtEttbt

Page 169: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

BHhH

HHEH

BHtsH

HHtsH

HHEH

EHftF

1600 PENNSYLVANIA A\,'E I'IWWASH|NGTON DC 20500-0003

hnpsJ/secure.accurinl.com/app/bps/mai

I All FullNam€ AgE/DoB A.lds€s +*

Date Phone lnfomalion

EI*

6*

E*

tt*

eldt*

R*

E*

E*

E*

EIt

Er =? r= r-l /MlcrlELLE oBAMA

A Es r{]F / c.no". r"*eI 35o5Grtr

MICHELLE OB,AMA

BHtsR/ MICHELLE OBAMA

MICHELLE OBAMA

MICHELLE O64MA

MICHEILE OBAMA

BHtsF

5046 S GREENWQOO AVE

, CHICAGO 116061t2806 A!qos-A€()7

1 OLD STATE CAPIIOL PLZ APISPRINGFIELD lL 62701-l 512 M.y 0€ - Sep 09

Jun 08 - Se? @

MICHELLE OBAMA 505 CATI.IARINE ST

Ft E5 B.l4l P'rILADE' PHIA PA re ! :loos As oZ( 6E !ii;i c-nds Femb

5o3o ouENlrN sT 303 365-5697 ' MDT

DENVER CO 80239-4312 Jul@'Aus@

123 W NORTH AVECAROL STREAM lL 60188-2001 M 09-A!S@

936 4 [4ILE RD NWAPTGRANDRAPIDS M|495!4-1503 Jan0S-Jul09

3550 S RHOOES AVE APT 1 8!2cHtcAGo |L606511273

1901 COILEGE AVEFREDERICK llo 2i701 Jun 09-Sep09

1 PENNSYLVANNIABEVERLY Hll'LS CA 9021 0 Jan 09 - Sep 09

MICHELLE OBAMA

MICHELLE OBAMA

MICHEI.LE OBAMA

2of3 10/19/09 9:15 Alr

Page 170: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

SSN Verifier Plus

ssNID4425

'j":,i1sl ai,:: S :a:= :s.treC

Yea(s) lssued: 1977-1979

Sbb lssuedi Cooneclictd

:;a;al .1:i:.iiji i,r'. )tL::r !'lieiiSSN not found in Social Securior Death lndex

l,i.i:,1.i ,i r;r.ai;:iril :r::a ii.ai'j

OBAMA, BARACK

OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN

;.'". !, . | 2:: :, r!:r.'.:l:,::.i ir'j;,:: .! :l':1890

08/04/1961

04/08/1961

Page 171: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Tmce$ lnfornation Specialists, lnc. - Scandard People Seerch h(ps:/A}'1rr/.trdccrsinfocod/S€archcentral/vi.wr€lllrtlphp3?psrgs=..

Standard People Search

'lOS Fecoftle

Soarch Crllsrta

l,lane: OBAttlA BAFACK

Flags: Anests. Bankruptdes, Crlminal Faclrds, Evlctions, Protessbnal Lic€nsas. Wanants

Reports ilame

1930 WALLACE ST

OAAMABARACKH

OBAMABARACK

OBAMAMRACK

OBAMABAFACK

OBA' ABAMCK

OBAl,lABARACK

OBAMAAARACK

osAtVlABARACK

OBAMABARACKL

OBAMABARACK

OBA^/IAAARACK

lraeo

It

't

Mapt1

ll

f.4apIt

il+lVapIt

ss / Dog

295 HARVARD ST 1505 2xCAIVIBRIDGE lvll\ 021 39-23e2RePorted: 01/2o0s - 01/012009Cou.rty: i\rliddl-.ser

1600 PENN AVEVVASHI,\IGTON OC 20007REported: 12008 - 120$Count: Distnci oi Columbia

559 W GOLF RD lxARLINGTON HTS IL 6000'3904Roporbd: 1'U2008 - 11,/2@aCounty: Cook

56THORNTOI!FDNEEDHAU i/tA 02492-4330RsporH: O9l2008 - 'l t12mSCounty: NORFOLK

7.T 3 HART SENATE\./vASHINGTON DC 20510-0001Reported: tl20OS - 1llz{}imCo(,'lty: Dislricl Df Columbra

3535 OLIVE STDENVER CO 80207-1523Reported: 09r20o8 - 1112@Counly: Denver

810 E 13TH AVEEUGENE OR 9740r-3742(:tssr:rL: ]1lcji irsll)Rsported:092m8 - 1U2m8Couaro': Lane

1x

435 DALLAS AVELANCASTER TX 75146R.ported: 09,12008 - 11l2mgCollnly: Dallas

(24)336-7i22 N

N

Lardlin€:(215)235-3040

1x

N

lx

1,

lr

1x

2xPHILADELPH]A PA 19130-3220Rerorted: o9t172000 - 10r032oo8Counv: Philadelphia

1OOO NW 33 AVE AFORT WORTH TX 76180Report d: fi/zooa - 0S/2O04Co.tng: Tarranl

675-54-6554

123i\ilAlN STCHARLESTON SC 23464R6po.bd: 0e/20O8 -(Bl2mgCotnty: Ch6rjeston

of8

Reporf3 ssrl r ocF

IUA@ 9114 AN

Page 172: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Tmcers ldornation Sp€ciatists, ln€. - Sratdard PeoPle S€arch htlps://wwn.lm.e$info.cotlsearchcentral/viewrelurlphp3?pargs:

OAAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABARACK

E-mail: brbana@letmbg com

OBAMABARACK

OBAMAAqRACK

OBAMABARACK

OBAMABARACK

OEAMABAMCK

OBAMABARACK

OAAMABARACKHUSSEIN

5450 S EAST VI:W PARK PK 1X

c,!lcAGo rL 60615Reporred: 0a/'20l20o8 - 082012008County: Cook

1977 -1919 in CfDOB: 08104/1961 Age: 48

Landline:1773)5E.: 4809

Cell:(3121310-0C59

14 W ERIE ST 1XcHtcAco rL 00654(FO;: Br- | I -1: )Repori€d: 08,2012008 - 08/20/2008County: Cook

[42pIt

(No lP Address Reponed)

X'lapIt

Phoner (312)751-1170

130 N LASALLE 1xcNlcAGo lL 6c601(D' ::11 :' : )Report€d: 08/18/2OOa - 08/'18/2008Counly: Caok

NO ADDRESS REPORTEDcHtcAGo |L60615Reported: 08/'1812008 - 08/182008County: Ccok

83775 ATITES RDJACKSCi'.1 Ni 08527Repo.ted: {}2./2003 - 0812008Courfy: ocean

1C00 33R0 AVEiORr\,VORT1lTX761911Repo.ted: 08l20oa - 082008co!nty: Tairant

505 FARR CCOLUIT4BUS GA 3l907-6?75Reported: O1/20O8 - 042008Counly: lurscogL'e,!CO3 RUCKER R'AiP!IAREiTA GA 3OOO4 ]435Reporled: 08/2008 - 08l20ogCounty: FULTOi I

180 i\I LA SALL' ST 22OOci-ircAGo iL 606cr '261C{P-l-._: i r:al:.1 S:)Reported: 06/01/2007- 06/01,12008County: C.o(

Nlapt

4s"10-:15;( - -:'J S^tlssued:195,1-1955 in lA

42A-6i-2!45

R€pori.

19771979 in CTDOB: 08/04/1961 Ag€: 4a

ssil / DoB

-412519rZ-1979

'n c"l

Lardline:(773)634-4e09

OBAI'IA Li.lFRAi.I(L|N Wi 53132Report€d: 05/2004 - 06/2009County: Nljlwaukee

123 WF]iTE HOUSE

R€poned: 0612008 - 06/2004Cornfy: ORAi'lGE

15AIAI4ANALAPAN FL 33462Reported: 05/2ma - G5f2008County: Palm Beach

50aC S GREENIr\iOOD AVEcHrcAGo 1150615-2805{-l:S i.r.; :il nrsil)Repo.led: lZOl2AO7 - Mnln$)8Count: Cook

li#fr1-uuon *

OBAMABARACK

OAAMAAARACK

OBAMAAAR,CCKHUSSElN

It

5x

of8

DO€: 08/04/196'1 Age: 4{l

10U@ 9:14 AM

Page 173: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

TraceB lnfornarior Specialists, Inc. - Sbndard Pcople S€arch hdp6/*T!'w.ncrsinfo.corn/S€arcicenta/vi€*.r€tumphp3hrgs=..

5450 S EAST VI:W PARK 1

cHtcAGo tL 60615ReporEd: 03252008 - O3/25l20O8Countyr cook

NO ADORESS REPORTEI)CHICAGO IL O

40 TRANSFER STDEN\€R CO 80207R€porH: 03,/2m8 - 03i'2008

Ilapit

tx

i.4ap

(No lP Address Reported)

tP, ir?-'rr'n "r Pl*X";""""DOB: 08IW1961 Age: 48

t rdline:{303)545-0199

1xOBAMAMFACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABARACK

OBAN'ABARACK

OBAMA&ARACK

OBAtr,lABARACK

OBAMAAARACK

: Denver

111 PENNSYLVANIAAVEV/ASHINGION LiT 84780Repo.ted: 0S/'20O7 - 02,/2008

505 FARR CcoLU[18!S CA 31907ReporH:02l2ma - 02/2008Count: luuscogee

14 'V

ERIE STcHlcAGc lL 60610(rrosstEl: - cr r-t sli)Repo.bdt 01lttzf2$@ - Ollo2niAaCoung: Cook

423-29 2961ls!u6rt: 198&tS89 in AL

799-89-7090

l!

i\,1apIt

Landline:(312)751-1 170Cell:i312)310-tC69

E-nail: bobama@lawmbg com Phone. 13121751-1170

Repoal8 Add€aa SSN '

DOB

lf4azsbsu€d: lgn-1979 in CTDOB: 04/08/1961 Age: 48

651-234987

lraF

it

It

ti

l'/apIt

FhdE

OSAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABAFIACK

OAAMABARACK

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

MROBAMABARACKH

OBAt'lABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMA&qRACK

5450 S EAST V]EW PARK PK 8XcHtcAGo iL 6c615Reo6t@ : 01 lO2l2M - 01 MlzWCoutrty: Cook

PO BOX 1236PROVO Ui 846C3,1236Reported: 01/2tl08 - 01,r20o8County: ulan,I5 A1AT,ANALAPAN FL 33434ReporH: 0 l/2OOg. 01,/2008Co{nt: Palm B€ach

5450 S EAST V|EW PARK 1 8XcH!CAGO tL 60€15RepoftEd: 11nSnW7 - 11hl'12{n7

; Cook

5046 S GREENWOOD AVE 12xcHtcAGo iL 6061s-2806

R€po.ted: O720O5 - 11./1512007Co.rn!': Cook

. 1977-1979 in C-fDOB: 04/0€i/1S61 Age 48

197t-1979 in CTOOB: O8/O1,nS61 AEe 4a

Landline:t773)684-4809

Landline:i773)684,4809

Landllne:(773)684,4809

Landin€:17n)6444849

365 BROAD\r'r'AYSOiTIERVILLE MA 02145Repornsd: 0€v01/19€6 - 10rc1/r20o7Courty: frliddlesex

197-1979 in CTDOB: 08^X/1S61 Ase: 48

5

5

5oBAMA :1'" 919f?'ii I Bi^- .. 12'

f,0$glt a#*f?J#i5i1"0"'o*'918 BAINBRIOGE STPHILADELPHIA PA 19147Repord: O8/2m7 - Oa/20O7

1977-'t979 in cT

of8

Philadelphia

lxDOB: {X/@fi961 Age: 48

lOI?Jc, 9:14 AM

Page 174: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

'l mcers lnformation Specialisls, {tc - Shndatd People S'€rch hltpsJ/www.trEcersinio.co*'/Sea.€hc€nt al/viewel!.LPhp3?pargs=.

OBAiIABARACK

OBAMABARACKH

OBAMABARACK

OBAMABARACK

OBAMABARACK

OBAMAAARACKHUSSE$l

OBAMABARACKs

OSAMABAMCKHUSSEIN

OBAiUABAMCKHUSSEIN

OBAMABARACKH

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

lrlapLi

j\rlap

t

iliapIr

It

i,lapli

i

ivlapLi

Llapll

lvlaoli

Mapli

Itaps

!t

1'3 iNALN STLANS tiG l\4:48910F.epotl'.rj" 9712co7 - o7l2OO7

1€O N LA SALIE ST 22OONcH CAGC L 60601 2501(::'j:ili !,liGi =liii)Reported: O2l2007 - 06,12007County: Ccok

Zx

Reports

I+,:sl8u€d: 197-1979 in CT

ss / DoB

i 19r-1979 in CTDOB: 0e0411s61 Age: 4a

901,09 8765

l1o#-tntn'n ",DOB:08/04/1361 Age: 4e

5

Landline:(773)681 4309

Landline:l21t)492.5482

Landline:1773)684 4EC9

Landline:(773)684 48C9

Landline:'\773J6844849

Landline:!,773)684-4409

i 236 PC BO'{PROVO UT 6N603Reported: 06/2007 - 0612007

6r! - oLD 'riLLOr / RDFROSPECT HEI3NTS IL64070,1-.13Reporte& wl2oo1 - 0$2cn7County: cooil

2x

1x

1x5C5 CATi-]AR i\]E S;PHJLADELPH]A PA ] 9147 3O!9Repofted: o4l2clo7 - O4,2OO7Counly: Phlladelphia

545' S EAST VIEW PAR( 1

ch cAGo lL 506:s 5916Repotted: 07,2006 - 07/2m6Cotrnty: Ccck

6C7 E ADAI,IS STSPRTi.tGFIELD i, 62741 1 331{: -_:: :. r ' irr PlS i}Repord: 04/212CO5 - 05/O7/'20OcCounl]: Sangarron

3!C I\TASSACHL-rSrTTS AVE 5 1x1/,lAS q t\iGTci\i tc 200c 1

Reforted: 020112006 - 020112006County: Dislri.t di Co unbia

227 €Tr S',l 1xlrrAs ll lr.lGTOi'i l:C 20002Repo.redr 0zola2o06 - 0201,200€County: Disirict Dt Colrribia

300 IVIASSACHUSETTS AV 3xti/ASHTNGiON DC 20001-26.i0Reporled: 06./01/1986 - 920112006County: Disaid ol Col!mbia

227 6TFiS_l 8x]TIASN]NGTON CC 2OOI]2

Reported: 0201/2006 - 02101/2006County: Disirici of Columbia

N

N

3x

9x

340 ITiASSACHUSETTS AVE tox0BAMA \,vAs9 NGTON DC 2ooo1 2029

9ffi9i1, neportet' os Eaos - o2n1nocsiricl ai CoLu.nbra

lllt+zslasued: 1977-1979 in CTDOg: 04/08/196t Age: ,18

Esued:'1977-1979 in CTDOB: 08/04/1961 AEe: 48

'l9TI-1979 in C'fDOB: 0.U08/1961 Age: ,t'8

sst{ , Doa

Gfi*i"?*-,rr*n", 684-4r]oeDO€: 0€10#1961 Ase: 48

25

N

ReFor1s

OAAMABARACKH

OAAMABARACK

?27 6li.i Si'/VASHING

foi\i iC 20002 6057Reporterl: 06/0111986 - oz0lzoOGCounty: Cistricl oi Columbia

L\I lgn-1979 in CT

of8

DOB: 08/0411961 Age: 486A4-.a€O9

l0n09 9114 AM

Page 175: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Trac€ls Informadon Specialists, Inc. - Standard People Search https://w*,w.Ftr€ninfo.coi/Scarrhcentml/viei,retlfi .phP3?pargs=..

OBAMABARBACK

OBAN'ABARACK

E-mait bobama@iawmbg com

OBAMABARACK

14 W ERIE STcHrcAGo LL 606i0 5397(:O-!S;EL: rirG:_ ilSii)Re9orbdi 12n120,l4 - O112ffiCoorlty: Cook

l,lapIt

(No lP Addrees Reporbd)

li

li

ti

li

Ii

(No lP Addre6s Reporleo

ReporH: 07/2006 - 11/2005Coutlty: Cook

2x

Gx

5046 S GRE'N!^./OOD AVEcHtcAGo rL 6061s 2406(PC:SrBLE rlc :? sli)

Phoilei (312)751-1170

t-andllnel{312)751r 170

Landline:(773)884,4a09

Landline:(773)684-480S

lr.dline:(773)684-4809

Landline:(r;3)363,:!s6

Lardline:(3121751-117C

OBAMAgARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OAAMAAARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMAAARACK

OBAMABARACK

OBAMABARACK

E-rnail: bobama@lawfi bg.conr

7435 S EUCLID AVE 2 lxcHrcAGo rL 60649Report€dr 052612005 - 05/26/2005County: Cook

54501 SE \ /V lxcNrcAGo 1L 60515Reporbd: 05,2moo5 - 05/262005County: Cook

5450 E VIE\IJ PARK 1 ITcHraA,Go rL 606]5R€port6d: 0512612005 - 0526.2005County: Cook

5450 S FAST VI:W PARK ict-ilcAGc rL 60615 5916ReporH: 05/'2005 - 05/2005Courny: Cook

54501 F VIE\/\/ r-ARKcHlcAco rL 60615Reported: 06/01/1397 - 05426/2005Coung: Cook

1013 E 53RD STcHtuAGo i!_ 6c615,4311RaportFdr 1212112OO4 - 01haDA06County: cook

1 9Z-1979 in CT

1S77-'1979 in CTmB: 08/04r'1961 Aqe: ,18

19Zt-1979 in CTOOB: 08,1O{/1961 Age: 4a

425197/-1979 in CT

OOB: 08/04/1 961 Age: 4u

Itoii*-'rr.r", b-gril"; .---DoB: 08/0411961 Ag€:48 (/ Irroo4 +ouv

tard$ne:l7 73)684,4849

tx

14 W ERIE ST lxcHrcAGo L 60554 5397(-:::,r ::,: r::- : :r,:)Ragor'e& 12hnAO4 - 0110612005County: Cook

Phon€: (312)751-1170

Reporc

OBAMABARACK

OBAMAEARACK

OBAMABARACKSEN

ll?B ss}{, x)s

!1apli

lt

FIE|E ARAddeaa10131/ 53RO STcH CAGO lL 60615ReporH: 072003 - 072@3Coanrly: Cook

10131 53RD STcHrcAGo 1L 606r 5Report dl 072m3 - 072003Courry: Cook

1x

,,

landllne:(773)363-1996

Landllne:(773)363-1996

Landline:(773)363-1996

i74r E 71ST STcHtcAGo lL 60649Repo.bd: 02/01/2mg - 02/0112@3Colmty: Cook

Repo.ted:10l(

iof8

E-mail: jenmasondistl [email protected] lP add€ss: 194100,7€.133

l0rz09 9: 14 AM

Page 176: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Tracrls bformalion Spe€ialists, Ine. _ Standald P€ople S€arch httls Jh*.ww.tra.ersido.con/S€archc€ntrai/viewretufirphp3?pares=

OBAMABARACKH

OEAMABARACKH

OBAMABARACKH

OBAMABARACKH

OAAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABARACKH

OBAMABAMCKH

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABAMCKH

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBA 'ABARACK

HUSSEIN

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAi4AEARACKH

5,150 S EAST VIE\ / PARK 1

cHtcAGo lL 6c615 5916Reported: 10/1997 - 10/2002County: ccok

5450 S EASIVIEW PARK 1

aHicAGo tL 601iT5Repotled: O7r2OO2 - 07l2OD2Coung: Cook

1x

5450 S EAST VIEW PARI( 1

cH CAGO iL60615Repot€dt o7EN2 - o7l2w2

365 AROADWA\'SO|,IERVILLE i A 02145-2440Repo.t€d: 06/01/1S6 - 07/17l20O1Colniy: []iddles3x

7436 S EUCLID AVE 2 8xc!itcAGo L 60649R€poned: 11/13/2000 - 11/13/2000Count: Cook

7436 S EUCL]D AV 8XctiicA6c ii 50649 3€26Reponed: 06,10111986 - 11lt3120o0

lx

7x

IiCtczsb6u€d: 1977-1979 in CTOOB: 08/04/1961 Age: 48

lHl,oiii'-,,,"," .,

350 60-2302l*ued: 1s7t1976 in lL

#l'oii-,n,n,'".,DOB: 08/04/1961 Age: 4€

1977-1979 in C"fDOB: 04/08/1961 Agp: 48

lF,**"ir*-,rrr," "tOOB: 0a/0.t1961 AE€: 48

!f!,?#.,.,.,"",mB: 0410a/1961 Ase: 4a

t]fFifi-,,,","",DOB: 08104/196'l Ag€: 4a

f"^25l*ucd: 192-1979 in CTDOB: 0€L/04/1s61 ager 48

Landline:(773)484-4809i1

11146

684<a0g

684-.1809

5r5a !, E/, iAOBAMA r.q rrc; ' oootsEARACK Reborted: 1O/01/t999 _

HUSSEIN coi;nty; c )ok

8x

10/0'1/1999bndline:(773)644r809

Landline:(773)63;1'4309

684-4809Landline:(773)684-4809

kndine:(773)6E4 4809

l.,andline:i773)684 4609

ss , ooB

1Sit7-1979 in CT 6a4-480S

DOB' 08fi96'1 Age: 48

54501 SF VIEW PKailrcAGo LL 60615Repo.ted: 06/01/1s86 -County: Cook

5450i Sa Vr=W PKCI]!CAGO LL 6N6i5Reportedi 10101/1999 - 10,10111399Coung: Cook

5450 S =AST

\':E\^/ PA 1 5XcHtcAGo lL 60615-5916Repo.t6d: 06/01fi986 - 10/01llg9€County: Cook

5450 V EW PA 1xcHicAGo rL60615R€Po.ted: 1o/01/1S99 - 1On11199€County; ccok

49798 PO 3OX lxCHiCAGO !L 60649Reported: 09101/1999 - 09/01/199SCour$: cook

849798 POcHtcAGo tL 6c649Reported: 0e/01/1999 - 0€l0ll1999Courfy: caok

lxl,/lap

10/01/1999 li

tulap1t

Mapli

tulapt:

1x

44251977-'1979 in CT

DOg: 0a./&/1S61 Aga 4a

: lgrz-197e in CTEjOB: tr8l04,/1961 AE€: 4a

J]++zsksued: 1977-1979 in CTDOB: 08/0al1961 Ag€: ,{}

f]4425lsued: 192-1979

'n CT

849798 PC zxcFiicAco 11 60649R€pord: 09/1S99 - 09/199OCounty: Cook

ot8 1Ol2/89 9:t4 AM

Page 177: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Tracem lnfoniation Spetialis6, Inc _ Staddard P€xrple Sea$h https:/www-fac€lsinfo.cofi r/S€rchceMal/viewretunphP3?parg!='

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABARACKSEN

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAi'ABARACKHUSSEIN

OEAMABARACKH

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABARACKH

OBAMABARACKH

BARACKHUS9EIN

OBAiUAEARACK

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMAEARACKHUSSEIN

PO tsOX 49798CH]CAGC 1L 60G49R6port€d: 09/1999 - 09/199€Colnty: Coak

Gii#-'rrn,"",DO8: 04/0d1961 Age: 48

1977-1979 in CTDOB:08/02V1961 AgEi 4a

sslt / DoB

sslt t Do8

ris'red: 1977-1979 in CT

Landline:(773)684-4809

L3ndline:(773)363 1996

Lardline:(773)684-4809

2152 E 71ST STcHtcAGo lL 60649Reported: 05n1/1s99 - O5Ot/1999Counry: cook

1440 E 52ND SI', 8xcHlcAGo lL 60615Reported: 01/01,r1S99 - 01/01/1999Courty: Cook

T 440 E 52ND STcNlcAGo lL 60615Reponed: 01/01/1999 - 01/O1/1999

54501 E VjEW FARK ,ixcHicAGc li 605'15Reportod: 06./1397 - 06,/1997coui/ty: cook

54501 VIEW PAa -fcAGo tL 60s15Reporred: 10n1/1994 - 10/01/19S4Co{rr*y: cook

Reported; 06/0'U1986 - 1O/Ol/19S4County: Cook

5450r SE VlE4/ PA 5xcHicAGo !L 60615'594:R€porbd: 06/01/1946 - 10/01/1s9tCo{nty: Cook

5450 S ;AST Vl:lll PK 1 lxCH]CAGO LL 60O] 5

ll++zsl6sued: 192-1979 in CTDOB: 0a/04/1961 Ase: 4a

--4425lssued: 1977- t979 in CT

tio#*-',,""",DOB; O4/O8/19€1 Ager 4a

-"a25tsuiil: 1977 1979 in CTDOB' 08r'0d196'l Aqs 4€

t -4425bsued: 19i1-1S79 in CT

UOB: 08/1961 Age: 4a

#iifl-,rr",n"'DOB: 08/04/1s1 Age: 4a

tofiir',n ",,"'DOB: 08/0{/1961 AgB: 48

llq+zslssu€d: 192-1979 in cTDOB: O4/0&1961 Age: 4a

1x

1x

ap8

ItCounty: Cook

365 BROAD\^/AY BI 'IXSODIERV]LLE i!{A 02I43 t,,1ap

liRegoftedi 1111z1997 - 1111?J'tW7

tlqazslssued: 192-1979 in CT

Landline:(7731684 4e09

Landline:{773)684-4809

68-1-480S

Phere

(773)684 48C9

Landline:{517)623-1266

(773)684 480S

Landline:(773)6e4-4809

16x

l/lapIt

I

llap1i

N

5450]SEV]EWPA L<citaAGo 1L 60615Reported: 10/01/1994 - 10/01/1991Couly: Ccok

365 SROADIVAY ST 4XaosroN [,1A 02111(:-r-:-L;- I ': )Repo.ted: 08/01/1SS4 - 08/01/199'4Counq: Suiiolk

365 BROADTA/AI ST 'I]xBOSTON KIA 02111(rc;SiiL- H'Cll F:i5iJR€ported: 08/01/1934 - 08/81/1994County: Sufio k

5324 S KIMBARK AVE AxcHrcAGo rL 60615R€porH: 12./O1/1SS-3 - 12101/1993

ivlapti

It

llape

l,4apii

5324SKITIBARKAVEcHtcAGo iL60e1s

1x bndline:(773)684-4809

of8

Reports

12101119sB - 12n1j1 3 DoB: 08/04/1961 Aqs.$

lol?09 9.14 AM

Page 178: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Tmcers lnformation Spe(iaiisrs. lnc. - Slandad Rople S€arh hltpc//wyw.trrcersitfo.cotttls€atdfeilral/viewret ft .Php3?par8F..

OBAMABARACK

OBAMAAARACK

OBAN4ABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAI'AAAFACKH

OBAMAAARACKHUSSEIN

OsAlilABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAi'ABARACKH

OBAMABARACKHUSSEIN

OEAMASARACKH

OBAMABARACKH

OBAMABARACKH

OBANdABARACKHUSSEIN

OBAMABAFACKH

OBAII,IASARACKH

7436 S EUCLlD AVEcHrcAGo rL 60149 3626Report d: m/199:] - O8/19e3Cormt; Cook

365WBROAD\AAY 1TBOSTON irtA 02127{:f:3i?L= iiG rits:i)Reporl€d: o7A1/1s91 - 0Z!l/1s91Count: Suffolk

5324 S K:MBARK AVE 3XcHtcAGC lL 60615-5287Reporled: o6n1,n$6 - 121990Coung: Cook

5450 EASryIEVr' PK 1

cHtcAGo tL 60i15lx

Reported: 08/01/1993- 09/01/199i]Cormty: Cook

365 BROAD"ryA)'B1souERV!t LE tltA 02145R€Porbd: oarcifigaa - 0s/01/19€8County: Uiddlesex

rN fl 1xcrilcAGo rL 6c6i5Repotled: 01D1/19a8 - 01n1,fl988Cosnty: Cook

]\ i\lci{cAcc rL 6c6 r5R€portad: 01/1984 - fi/1984

5429 S HARPEF AVE 1NalicAGo iL 6c615R€pord: 1001,/'1986 - 1oDlfiSoCoung: Cook

2\

192-1979 in CT

In4425bsred: 192-1S7S ln CT

1t)4425bdred: 197-1979 in CTOOB: 0ar'04fi961 Ag€: 48

llqqzsksrd: 1977-1979 in CTDOS: 08[4/1961 Age: 48

N

ivlapti

la

lllapIt

MapIt

tulapli

: 192-1979 in CTDOE!: 0€/tX/1S61 Aoe: 4a

1977-1979 in CfDOB:1990

192l-1979 in CTDOB: 08/0.1,nS61 Ag€: 4A

5

k€l,€d: l9zl-1979 in cTDOB: O8,(X/1961 Age: 4a

5

tandline:(773)634-480S

LaMtne:1617)623-1235

Lendline:FnJA84-4eC9

LrfldlLiie:t773)664-4€09

N

1x

u

1x

J)4425

5429 S HARPER AVa IN 3xcHrcAGo iL 60615 5548R€potted: 06/01/1986 - 1CY1986County: Ccok

t)4425bs.ted: 192-1979 in CTDOB: 08/O4/1s61 Ag€: ,18

Repo.ts r@ ssll t DoB

frOB: 08/1S61 Age: ,{8

102/-1979 ln CTD@:08/1961 Aq€: 68

1977-1979 in CTDOB:1880

kslled: 1977-1979 in CT

lS77-1979 in CT

1 .140 E 52ND STcFlrCAGO lL 606'i5-4137ReporGd; 04/1986 - (X/19€6County: Ccok

5I5O EAST\,/IET]\' PARK 1

cHtcaco ]l 60ri15: Cook

365 BROADIVAY 41SOfuIERVILLE fulA 02145-2440

5450 E VIE\^/ PARK'1cHlcaGo rL 606r5

: Cook

54501 SE \'VVcHtcAGo tL 60615

of8

: Cook DOB: G/0,Y1S61 Aqe:.$6A4-4{n9

IOru@ 'A

AM

Page 179: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Scrial Securitv D€alh Index Search Resuks hnp:/Asd i r00l5web.ances!t .com/cgi-bi n/ssdi.. tr

tumbRdc.dm lrt:

.lri!.:r' tl/\ ituserch.a r,ressrga sorrJs

Type ln Your Name & Get Your lnstant Family Tree!

,fl*rSocial Security Death Index Search Results

85.156,7it2 Recolds /rhe tcy to you rcsachlast qpdaEd on 9-2&2009 ' Jo'n i\n.esrr\.com Tolla! |

The Mr full.fanucd SSDI l.4h 6Ci6 on in 'nt

n.t

Field Valre Records ResrllsssN 465405154 1 5ea' ch

H!..d.eds c1

vi.w:ne l-1 of I Thoutarcls

Nom€ ",",r,

o"",0 f;i!',..""" li"j"r,, ssn rlsred roors "l$il, ,.,n,.fr,".

22 ll S.o i0l40 \\ i L(u(rlYllli*,.- o." re98 Lbnoni. 'non"^ +85.q0-5ts+ to* rr"l*l - Flrst Name:ttAl-lAf{lY\ts-:lsoecrlred}letz tv) L!!!!lJ \-. _ch \.J(: ,\.., m

vi'Yinc l'l of I Last raame:

{V)<Verified) R.pon verificd rvith a family member or $Incore adidg on behalf of a fadily memb.r-(P)=(Pr@f) Death Certifi@tc Observed. (cerrhYou can nolv order the SS 5 Fom for dcca*d individlals directly from the Social Seclnly Adminisuationonlin.ar@

Middle Narle

ssN 485405154Last R€sidence

ziP

County

City

Birth

Exact

(innial)

Lasi a.ll.fia

lof 2 10/19/09 l0:0a Atu

Page 180: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 16

Page 181: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Case: 10-55C8,1 0811 1i201C Pacte: 1of69 lD 743F,277 D{iEntry: 16-3

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

OFFICIAL REPORT

Thursday, 25rh March, 2010

The House met at 2.30 p.m.

[Mr. Speaker in the Chair]

PRAYERS

PETITION

Dr. Khalwale: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I stand here to make a petition on behalf ofKiborowa squatten who are a group of squatters from Trans Nzoia District under anorganizalion called Kiborowa Squatters Alliance- The squatters reside in the rural andperi-urban slums within Trans Nzoia and like our forefathers, remain landless and livingunder deplorable conditions. Some of those squaners €lre temporary labouers on theformer colonial settler farms now popularly called Agricultural Development Corporation(ADC) farrns. Our girls and women are raped and forced into prostitution and earlyrnarriages, occasioning high instances of HIVIAIDS and gender biased violence. Thereare high poverty levels leading to early school dropouts and childhood labour. Despitethos€ squafters making several presentations to the Govemnent with assuances fromdistrict commissionerst permanent secretaries and Ministers for Land and Settlementsince Independence, our people have yet to see any positive action. We are, therefore,praying through this petitior for your humble intervention as a House, so that theGovemnent of the Republic of Kenya may immediately s€ttle all the squatters on thefollowing ADC farrns: Sabwani, Sekhendu and Olingatongo ADC farms. We are alsopraying that the Government rcstrains those Members of Parliament who are incitingmembers fiom non-squatter comnunities to invade those farms.

Mr. Speaker: Order, Dr. Khalwale! You caught my eye to present a petition, butI am in doubt as to whether or not you have, in fact, conplied with Standing OrderNo.204. At least,I have ro indication liom the Clerk ofthe National Assembly, which Inormally have as a matte! of practice, that you have complied with Standing OrderNo.204. Can yos satisry me that you bave done so?

Dr. Khalwale: Mr. Speaker, Sir, this petition was presented to the Offioe of theClerk. He went th(ough it and marked it to the Sp€aker of the National Assembly. TheOffice ofthe Speake. ofthe National Assembly marked it to Mr. Ndoobi wh6 is in thelegal arm of Parliament. Mr. Ndombi invited me to his office. We \ /ent through thispetition and I am glad to confirm that we have complied to the letter, to the requirementsofthat Staoding Order.

Mr. Speaker: Can you, please, let me have a look at the petition to b€ satisfiedthat those steps have been taken?

Dr. Khalwale: Mr. Speaker, Sir. after I conclude or before?

Thursday, 25!h March, 2010(P)

Page 182: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

C;rse 1055084 jBt14,i2o1A Page; 31 of69 la.7436277 DKtEntfy: 15-3

the way to look at devolution is about governance, lf at all we take this Con$itutionwithout lookilg at the elements ofdevolution properly, then I am afraid we have missed

the boa1, We should be very courageous and brave because in 1963, resources were going

to the regions. It was not by changing the Constitution that the regions went but bystarving the regions of funds and even the power to t.Lx the regions. That is how the

regions were kilLed. But uhen the regiors were working, even hon. Ngala was feelingbetter and safer as the president of the Coast region rather than being a Member ofParliament here.

The other thing that we are addressing through devolution is exclusion. What has

made us sufer as a lation is exclusioq. Once people feel excluded, even when you want

to employ a policeman or constable or you want to build a dispensary, it must come ftomthe centre. In the colonial days, these things were being done on the gound atrd they

could give bursaries and build roads- I corrunend devolution. Those who fear devolutionare living in the past. l hey arqleing guided by their etbnic consideration and objectives.

They are living in the past.llf America was living in a siluation where they feared

ethdcity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation how could a young man

bom here in Keny4 who is not even a native Americar! become the President ofAmerica? It is because they did away witb exclusiorl Wbat has killed us here isexclusion; that once Mr. Orengo b President, I know ofno other place than Ugenya. Thatis why we were fighting against these many Presidencies in the past. I hope that Kenyawill come ofage. This countty must come ofage. People want Aeedom and nations want

liberatior\ but countries want independence.I beg to suppofi.Prof. Kam.r: Thank you, Mr- Deputy Speaker, Sir, for giving me the opporturtty

to cortribute to this historic Motion- I would like to support it with amendments and Iwill be mentioning w'hich ones.

Mr. Depuy Speaker, Sir, allow me, first, to congratulate those who have

participated in the procass of Constitulion-naking in this country. I want to recognize the

vetemns - the Orengos and lmanyaras - past and present. I also }lant to remember 1o

rccognize the Bomas goup ofdelegates that gave us the lirst Draft (2004). I also want toremember the Comrittee of Experts (CoE) and our own Parliamentary SelectCofunittee. These people have done a cornmendable job. The Constitution makingprccess has been very long and tedious. Sometimes it has been acrimonious and tempers

have gone up and down. But all in all, the process has brought us this far and we must

thank God fo! that.Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is instruciive to note that while it has taken a very

long time, there axe some zre.is that have consistently rernained in all the &afts that we

have today. As we consider that, we are reminded of why Kenyans \r'anted to have a

Constitution, to begin witlr- In the preamble, there is a statement that says: "We, thepeople of Kenya adopt, enact and give to ourselves and our future generation thisConstitutiorL"

1\4r. D€puty Speaker, Sir, we must enstrle that Kenyans get a new Coostitution

that will serve them and the futule generalions- How do we ensule this? We must ensule

this by ensuring that the Proposed Constitution is good for all, fair to all and serves all.

This may require the spi.il of give and take, but it must all be inclusive and non

exclusive. The eyes ofthe nation are focused on this House. We must ris€ to the occasion

3t Thursday, 25'h March, 2010(P)

Page 183: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 17

Page 184: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama s Literary Agent in l99l Booklet: 'Bom in Kenya and Ia... Page I of2l

IITERABY AGENT 11{ 1991 B00K[ET: 'B0Rl{ lil

BarackObamaBaEok Qlir,l}ra, u@ lt9,AJria:] A:ner-x prcsid€DL oftre tla.a&tl: i,ri Reoew waq

bom u! Keilva a,rd rered inlndcnes,a drl Harvair 'I-h-" i5r

KEI{YA AI{D RAISED IN II{D{IIIESIA AIII! IaHAWAII'

THE UETTING - EXCLUSIUE - OBAMA'S

Note ham Senbt Manogetudt:

A^&eu Brettbad w6 neuer a "Bi.7het,' dftd Bt itbarr Neas is a

'te thot h@ n@er aduocute.l the natotiDe oJ "Bittherism." In

fact, A"drew beLtlee4 u w .lo, thdt I't6idqt Batuck Otunaluos born in Honolulu. HauaiL ona sust4,1961-

vet AtuIrcLo also believed that the @mpliot noinsieatu media

hdd rcJted to exanine Praident Obdnb's ,leologicaL pdst, ot the

caetu s.ruJtqtpe@no he ond his aAvi9m had s'^sn aedfor

u EJor that @'on thot w lonthed Ihe vpttins,- oq onsohgR&tr in uhiJh ue aplorc the ,Jeolosical backgtdn l oJP6i.lent obono (and oth6 prcidential @tulanvs\-rct to eUtigdte 2oo8, but beeue i.lss dnl actioLs huue co%eqrencs.

It is also in that spiit thot ue [email protected], dd n@ prent, th.booklet daecribe<l belou-ote L\at inalud6 a turketing pitchfot a

forth@mins book b! o then louns, otheruie u\k'turJoflne.lresrzal o/rhe Handd ta{ R*i..w.

II isdiden@ flot ol the P6ident st'Nisn onsin, but detBatuck obamd s ptbli. pqsona has pqhaps been prcsqleddife@tu at difretuat nn6.

REIATEII ]IEWS

"H{fr.* ,t**# s'Eus's\ srep)

ffi4""*it*

MOST P(}PUIAB

. 1lerJlrr q!{!r4-1r!!.&4-U!ls!: lirBirtberln-al,'er rhltd: / s\1! hrehbr.tumrBrs-cr^.mmcnr'!on/o8,h4lTcdD:Ohama Birther-ln-Chi.o

. BrandoaDarb!!rjd!!Ichr!!!la!!&!t}c lL\C: r3iie Dl^{n thr EtiS SFtcnl(htio:,//{\$r.bruitba.t..0nlBig-

. Gnemneni/2o12/o8/:r/B.!ndonDrrln oN.\.d(hist Plans'tu.rhe

BNCJDLI!ding-'fqknrs'Dor$-lh.-Cin-

w1l''Jl,@lorge9honKeM'fu

b.slMfuyfuhaje@fufunglhe@,)@,w,alre69acneGciA,@e

. !bn4da!d!tt Hr!.als!t'!!-sl!!\Rome\ Bcins !nder Soc.et Churclr

cllljelA$!.1-lr4${.b4i$!I!!ElErcitb4e1-l'l:a!rra8/?iMrl. r!:E4 iLlunrsnrrn-Slnhs-Ron!w-Bcnrq%20Under-secrel-\lornon ahurrh-

c!!!!D

ll' in://, \\ l,r!ith.r1.L,rm Bi!-Iloli!.\.od,i2c12loA1::,rBc{-Oaice-Ari.s:?i:rarei

&l;;tr;iE:]*

,-.1@4. E

;;ifiit#,-R; ' Ur Alt.rrb j-L-D!! jarr +G]:rlEEgr4salqsr:re&Rfi lhr, o",l

_"d"v'" @

httpr/wwwbreitbart,corn/Big-Govelnmenl/2012/O5llllThe-Yetting-Barack-Obarna-Litel3'...8126/2012

Page 185: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent in

Breitbrn N. s has obtaincd a !rcnoftnal booldet rrcduc€d in1991b,y 8a.ack Ol)ma r thenliterir_a agenc!,^cton & Dystcl,

whjch touts ob.ma as bom in (ent? and raised io indonesia .ndIiahzii.'

The booldet. \vhich was distribulcd to trusiness coU.aSues' in th€

publishing industrr', includG a briel bio8raphl' oi Obama amongthc bioglphies of ei8hty-nine other authoN reptusented br -{cbn

h also p.ohotes obda s dticipatcd fiBt bo.k, "Io!nc?s tn Alaclond tfl rf e-which Obrnrr ab4rrlg!re4.1:lrt!t!l\tr,-C!l!r!rl4!!t!.nui ri.s olliiils, r.roqrr :ir:&.[{rbrnrr]r.itipe-booiisrrriio-!r])!4.d!,r!!4!n4$l! :!!.rel, htcr publishjqs D.@D$lrcm M!/

obatu s biosraphy in th. b$klct is as fouoss (inuse and rext

l99l Booklet: 'Born in Kenya and ra... Page 2 ol21

_$Zq!' Bouf ( c?!P!l:iEi{Bf!e]]!:1l]:tirhc McO!b-!i!$ lrlbl]r1.qrlrr E]c.G!$:rj4!V?!r:ia8]:!lZq!!,!qq!!!:!:P!$!!r!gi!:!-&Lc-)

c@,!nrnt2o':/.1/'r!!

.+:Htg#*T BREIEABTVIOEOPICKS

,_^.* @

*xff*#i..**cwUPFORouRffi FBarackObama

,,'.],.*.. @brm n Ker\% lod Rirnj rrLi.irr:d f'r t..rajj t'h. r,:lc( :t. rrr!4.,6 . d,or .!f,iJF:srorC r R.r+dr JiJBio: nunsr'rl

rJlr,rr:rJ U(i :f,rP;*r 4 a

i;]..!'.'li..IJl'9]vals

Bradi ob. ma, the li6t Atiics-Amdi@ proidcnr of the!l ard br R.\jerr, s as bom in Kcnr! and !!i{d inlndonesia and Hawaii. rhc son of an Ameri@ anthftpologistand a Le.ru fin ce Einist€., he .ttended colebiaUnn€rsily and wo.kd as a lnancial jou.nalist d.d editor forBu.ind InterMtion.l copomrion. nc sen€d as prejcct

.oordimtor in Harlem lor the Neh Yo.k Ptrblic Intcrest

R6cNh Croup, and was Exemii\e DiJecto. of the DeleloPi!8con muitics Prcject in chicaso s South Side. Hiscommitnent io social and racili isstrG sill be qideDt in his

F,*tbtbl.Jottuus in Rl\ckand uthit .

.,,"'"_' E

http://&'\,w.breitbart.com,Big-Govemmentl20l2/05/17lThe-Yetting-Barack-Obama-Liter!'...8/26/2012

Page 186: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

The V€tting - Exclusive - Obama-s Literary Agent in 1991

The b@!let, which is thinv-sd pass long. is pdnted in blue inL

{dit, on the cover, silvey'srev inli), 6ins otrset iithogalhv Itpulpo.ts to @lebute the fiIteenth milesaiv of Acton & Dystel.

which {s lounded in 1s76-

Booklet: 'Bom in Kenya and m... Page 3 of21

rfont@ter(ottside) aate Baflck obdma llstedin alphabeti$lorder

F}ont @vet (insid.)

Jay Acton no longe. r€Prsmts Obatu. Ho{ever, Ja@ Drstel still

lists fttt': / /$av-d\srel.com/dient_lisv+ol ob@a as a client oo

Accorihng ro ihe bookl€t it*4 the te{t &rs edited bv Mi'imGoderich, who hu since beom€ Dvsiel s partnd at D\stel &

Codench {hlrp: /

^14ft-&stei..om/about/l an asencv foftded in

1994. Breiibad Ne6 ari€mpted to each codench bv telelhone

http:/A^,r v.breitbart.com,Big-Governmenv2 0l2l05l17lTirre-.letl;ng-Barack-Obama-Litera 812612012

Page 187: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent in

serem1 times oer soeral days. He. cals aie *reened by dauloroted s6ice tbat reqtris @lleN to state thet nam€ ddconpdy, which we did. she nfler dreNd.

The d6ign of the h@tl€t $E uddtaten by Richard Eelse', whohas since closed his bulnss. Bellsey, reached by telelhore, could

not rec.ll the eBt details ofthc booklet. but told Breitbart Nehs

rhat it "sounds likc one of oujobs, Iike I did for [A.to! & D]stelltw€nt! lrtrs a8o o. morc.r'

I 99 I Booklet: 'Bom in Ketrya and ra--. Page 4 of 2 1

E trrard t. ata!aDyat l

The parade ofauthoF alongside obam in the booklet includcspoliticutrs, sub as form€i speaker of the Houle Tip ONeill; sporisl%ends, ssh as J@ MontaD and KarEeh AbdulJabbar; ddnumercLrs Holbryood celeb.ities.

'l he Brrse side ofth. pa$ that f@tuB BaEck Obama includeslomer CMn Party pqidentul andidate Rrlph Nader dd elrb -r99G "bo! bald DoD *Ntion N6 Kiils On lhe Bloclc

BarackOballna

E!Itt.rk

HO'Ig6lll

P.

hnp://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govemmentl20l2/05/17/The-vetting-Bamck-Obama-Litera... 8/26/2012

Page 188: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent h l99l Booklet: 'Bom m Kenya and ra... Page 5 of21

EBdDrtlirdd

atoh!uqrlly

tg.r fftl| Onttr. Bloot

I

,i

Acto4 sto spoke to BEitbort |tI.6 by t€l€phonc, confrmedpEile details ofdE boo[et anil said tbat it cost thc asency teB oftlrcusand! of dol€$ to Drcd!.€.

He indi@ted that wlil€ 'alhost nobody" emte his or h€r o$rbiognphy, t!. noMrfttc6 in the booklet, wboa'the a8€dts dslttl *lth on a datly brsis,'rerE 'prcbabb/ appoach€d to app.orr

Drstel did not rerpohd to nlreroE Equett! for colDmt virenail.nd t€lephorF- rcrrsisteittoH BEithart Nes tbrt DyEt l"do€s not aiawe. qugtlons about obam."

The €nant Ob€ma bi('glrphy in the Acton & Dlslcl boold,et desmt corhsdict the suth€rticity of Oboma's birth c€rtificate.MorcorE, scE rl contemtutueoa aeounlrahttp://ircni6uneltism.@m/2o12lor/u/obea-looo-intef,.ieww@-Eoirt+cMbaw-bennirit€d-meri@n of Obernatbakgrcund dsclibe obo@ eE b,viry beeD ho, n in rlas.iirbttP: //m-.NtiF6.@p/106/o2lo6lus/f rst,bl!ct+1..t€d-tc

The biogEphy doe8, bos€ver, fit a pattem in which Obama{! thep€ople repr..s*ing ,nd supportiDg hin-E nipulate hn! Fblic

Dsvid Mrl3nb6:s ftrticolnilg bialapby of Obana hgrepodedv lqlosedrhftp: //m.r2nitdair.bm/9oliti6/to12lo6lwmq beack-obamu-in-lde david-maeisl. ntr exampl€, tlat a [email protected]€s!'bed iD D&mton !r! adE {!s, in faat,.rmahu of €wersl sepdate indiaiduels.

In addition, Obai!.l a.d bls h{ileB haE a hi*ory of r€definitrthis i&ntity when €{Fnient. Ir [aa{h 2oo8, for €r.rmpl€, hefdou$y dlllalElahttp://1.|w.hufdnetonp6t.6o/2ooa/oilr8/obaM-rrce-sPeech-read-th n azott htnD: "I c.n @ E or€ dtuo,.?E FeNdiahWlidtl thrn r cln disord th€ black cffmunity. I can no hor€dbown hiE thad r ca.! ry white glandsodler.'

http:/ Mww.breitbad.com,/Big-Govemment40 I 2/05/1 7fh+Vetting-Barack-Obama-Litera -.- 8126nO12

Page 189: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 18

Page 190: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

State ofArizona

County of Maricopa

)

) ss.

)

AFFIDA\-IT

{, the undersigned. being first duly s\om. do hereby'stale Lrnder oath and underperraltr of per.1ur1 lhat lhe lact' are lrue:

i. I am o\-er the age of iE and am a resident ofArizona. The information containedin this alfidavit is based upon ny orvn personal kno*ledge and, if called as a

witness. could testily conpeteutly tlrereto. I am the duly elected Sheriff ofMaicopa Count). Arizona. and I hal e been a ia$ en lorcement officer and olficial,in bofi state and f'ederal sovemrrrent- lor 51 vears.

).

4.

2

3.

In August of iasr year. a group of citizens lrorl the Surprise Arizona Tea Pary"organization met \\ith me in my office and presented a petltion signed byapproxinaiely 250 residents of \Iaricopa County. asking if I lvould investigate thecontroversy sirrrounding President Barrack Obama's birth certiflcate authentjcityand his eligibility to sene as the Prcsid€rt ofthe United States.

This group expressed its concen that. up until tllat point, no law enforcemenlagency in the country had cver gone on record indicating that they i'lad eitherlooked into this or that they *ere lvilling to do so. citing lack of resources andju sdicrional challenges.

The Maricopa County Sherilfs Olfice is in a rather unique position. Under theArizona Constitution and Arizona Reviied Statutes. as the elected Sheriff ofNlaricopa County. I have the autilo.ity to request the aid of the volunteer posse,located in the colLntt, to assist me in the execution of my drLties. Har'ingorganized a !olunteer posse ofapproxinately 1,000 members, I. as the Sherilfofthe Maricopa County Sherifls Office. can auihorize an investigation go fonvard toanswer these questions at virtuail! no eripense to the ta\ payer.

The Cold Case posse agreed to underlake the inrestigation requested by the 250cilizens of N{aricopa Count),. This posse consists of lonner police officers andattomeys who have rvorked invcstigating the controvers)/ sudounding BarackObama-

-fhe investigation mainly locused on the electronic documenl thar was

I

Page 191: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

presented as President Obanta s long tornt binh certificate to the American peopleand to citizens of \{alicopa Corurl b\ the \\'hite Holrsc on April 27. 20 i i.

6. Tl . i r r r e i r r :- . ' r r ' ' IcJ rn ,1 q19.g, c\rrrt IJltJIregistration ofbinhs ar rhe Hr\aii Departnentmade b1 11a*'aii go\emn'tenr ot'llcials regardin.sthe las( fi\e vears.

of the procedLrres regarding theof Health and various sntementsthe Obama birth controversv over

7. Lpon close exanrinrtion ofthe e\idence. it is nr) beliefthat folger)- and lrard waslikell' comrritted in ker idenrirr docLLIrlents inclLrding President Obanra s long-lornr birth ce11ificatc. his Selecrirc Ser|ice Registration card. and his SocillSecurit\, nunlhcr.

li.

9.

\lr investiuators and I belrerc tha! Presidenl Obanra-s long-lorm bifih ceniticaleis a co|nputer-generated docltnlent. \ai ntanLtl'actllred electroniaallj,. and diat itdid not originate in a paper tblnrat. ai clained b)- the \Vlrile House. Mostinrl)onantl\'. the regijtr-ar's stanlp in lhe coutpufer generated docLrment releasedbr" the \\'hire House and pojt.d on rhe \\'hile Houle \\ebsite. mav ha\e beeninlp()ned floln another unkno\n source docuntent. The eilect of the stamp notbeing placcd on the docunteu! plrrsuanr lo sttte and tederal lans nreans that thereis probahle cause that tlte documeni is a tbrger)-. and tltereibre. ir cannot be usedas a r erification. legal or olhetl\ iie- of the date. place or circuntstances of BarackObanra s birth.

Tire Cold Case Posse lau enforcement iu!esrigation iuto Berack Obana's bifihcenit-icate and his eliribilitl ro be plcsident rs on,going. The on-going narure ofrhe inrcstigaLion is duc lo additioltal inlbmtrtiolt that Ltas conra to light since lvelreld the press conlirerce in \larch. l0ll. -\s socrn as that inlbmlation has beenploperly rcrified br. the Cold Caie Poss.. I rill release thar inlonration to thepublrc-

E\ecLrted this iL da)'olJLrne.!laricopa Counr). Arizona-

\r orr r, ..d ..rb..r.b,d b<tur( r.r. ir .r\[l n ' or -.-JU4S_

]',.1'trq,.iu\,-\'rrL $',.\!Lt L,)

'j2l

Joseph \1. Arpaio. \laricopa County Sheriff

rbin' turac - 66 .aatsr..ri^flco$ cot wtY

Page 192: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT 19

Page 193: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

- ----- Forwarded message -----F.om Public Records <oare Thu. Aug 30.2012 ar 4 50 PMSubjecti FW: Request Voter Regrstralion NumberTo:!F4Er{*

G::.i a1.'"i,!i1:t.irenrs iial l n's :,i.i.: l,.t i'jit.' , : :.;; ::i it,i' 1:rsi.; :_: :r: !t :r.i,' r a'l ,i 'ir tlana-.-'r :' :,.1

Page 194: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

Frcm: Cot1d, (!y [Mdt :s€nt. ThuEd.y, ArSusr 09, 2012 9:11 pr'1

9rbiect RE: Direct nye6 corrd intonnat'o.

Page 195: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT2O

Page 196: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

l_ il ll t!

:'lll lt..lr lr:Yr

ct*lrflcaTt ot Ltvr BtnTHirlL.,. I5l

9t at&trt or lrlt!lx61 lrxi3?

t;;!T.?

, ili- .*pr r. I -: 11'r.

'

Ct!cra l r-.t'ttr r, !r l€r r l'.-'r

ri_:$

al ;i{{ll.r*, :l'.ifar..!r; :act{r f?!rtt{ fr:.tlc,'il t- !*- .* - sL.Ii.lli;r :(,'I;t :}: t: ::r-,a.$:.a

ll rn r ir*-, g iq r*,tr:r {* rd rr..-a3i i"<s lr;*rirr, irlti..rrrlt' h+r,

a;,*,* *. *"tr- \--; r,* - t!i..:^.--

i,ii( Irijiil. :l-lt ia ria'li.l\rl rit r.r tr\ t!t] !1 i..

,,,,.41i ::ia:

,trl l: ^

1it: r a\ir {t**rl:_ i t,.*{,1! li rl"-!,(ft irr i: {\\15r. a\:, {;ttl:ll{.;:

* i j!,{hf\i. \t !-t 1!Al_;11

i. "q ":'5.

t{,* L^.1l /J.*.*"st"",1\$.?i.,,. lt:r\; 1:r!1. I r rr, .!,.:r?

Page 197: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

EXHIBIT2l

Page 198: Grinols et al vs. Electoral College, Obama et al

BIRTHt!'"...I51

DlPlttA{iNT OF HIAIIX61 10641CERTIFICATE OF LIVE

IIJSSEII{ oB!!tA, li

4. 1

!.frtcdi{

BA:NC{

ILP,}

t'74/

Pt<rB

IPR 2$ 2011