1
1. Background: NIST Urban Testbeds and the NEC The NIST urban dome program currently funds three urban testbeds, designed to develop and test methods for greenhouse gas emissions estimation in urban regions: Indianapolis (INFLUX, influx.psu.edu), Los Angeles, (megacities.jpl.nasa.gov), and the North- East Corridor: Baltimore/Washington (NEC-BW). All three testbeds include continuous in-situ measurements of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane (CH 4 ) from towers and rooftops in the urban areas. The LA and NEC-BW networks use identical data processing, data flagging and filtering, calibration, and uncertainty estimation techniques, in an effort to standardize these operations (Verhulst et al, 2016; Welp et al., 2013). The NEC-BW project is a collaboration between NIST, the University of Maryland, Arizona State University, Earth Networks, NOAA, and others, and includes airborne campaigns in the region (FLAGG-MD, http://aosc.umd.edu/~flaggmd/), meso-scale and inverse modeling, inventory development (Hestia), and in-situ observations. Here we present some initial results from the in-situ NEC-BW network. Currently this network consists of 2 existing long-term Earth Networks sites (BUC and AWS) and 6 sites that have been established since Oct. 2015. Three of these (HAL, ARL, and NDC) have been operational for > 1 year. 6 additional urban sites are planned in the DC area, along with 4 sites to help establish background conditions. (maps from Google) Greenhouse gas observations in the North-East Corridor (Baltimore-Washington DC) NACP All-Investigators Meeting March 2017 CARVE BUC Code EN Code Location Name Lat Lon Top inlet height (agl) BUC GHG01 Bucktown, MD 38.46 -76.04 105 m AWS AWSHQ Germantown, MD 39.20 -77.26 40 m (roof) HAL GHG48 Halethorpe, MD 39.26 -76.68 58 m ARL GHG55 Arlington, VA 38.89 -77.13 92 m NDC GHG56 Northwest, Washington, DC 38.95 -77.08 91 m NEB GHG58 Northeast Baltimore, MD 39.34 -76.69 55 m NWB GHG59 Northwest Baltimore, MD 39.32 -76.58 67 m JES GHG60 Jessup, MD 39.17 -76.78 91 m JES AWS ARL NDC NEB NWB HAL 6. Diurnal Cycles & Vertical Gradient BUC 2. Network Design Study: Urban sites Sensitivity (monthly average footprint from network) Figure 2: Monthly average sensitivity to fluxes (top) and uncertainty reduction (bottom) of the optimized 12 tower locations in February (left) and July (right) 2013. February July 4. CO 2 and CH 4 Observations Figure 5: Monthly average CO 2 (top) and CH 4 (bottom) at NEC-BW network sites (top level, all hours). See Fig. 1 and Table for site locations. Figure 6: Monthly means were averaged together for 2012-2016 (after subtracting the annual global growth rate from NOAA) to obtain average annual cycles for CO 2 (top) and CH 4 (bottom) from Bucktown, MD (BUC), and the rooftop of Earth Networks Headquarters in Germantown, MD (AWS). Germantown (AWS) is a suburb of Washington, DC and close to a major highway. Bucktown (BUC) is on the rural Eastern Shore of Maryland, ~100 km from Washington DC but near the Chesapeake Bay and next to the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, a low-elevation wetland area with many ponds and streams. High CH 4 at BUC in summer months (Fig. 6) is likely indicative of local wetland emissions. Otherwise, CO 2 and CH 4 mole fractions are consistently lower at BUC than other sites. The more recently established sites in the urban network show monthly means that are similar to those at AWS. For more information or access to data from NEC- BW, please contact [email protected] References Verhulst, K. et al., “Carbon Dioxide and Methane Measurements from the Los Angeles Megacity Carbon Project: 1.Calibration, Urban Enhancements, and Uncertainty Estimates”, Atmos. Chem. And Phys. Discuss., doi:10.5194/acp-2016-850, 2016. Lopez Coto et al., 2016, “Tower-Based Greenhouse Gas Measurement Network Design”, doi 10.1007/s00376- 017-6094-6. This work was supported by the NIST Greenhouse Gas Measurements Program. Figure 7: Average diurnal cycle (averaged over 2016) from each level. All the NEC-BW sites, with the exception of the rooftop at AWS, sample at two inlet heights (levels). Here we look at the diurnal cycle (averaged over 2016) from each level. At most sites, the vertical gradient is very small or close to zero during the period from 12-16 local standard time. This indicates that despite their close proximity to CO 2 and CH 4 sources, the towers are generally high enough to observe a relatively well- mixed signal during the mid-afternoon hours of the day. Figure 1: Map of Northeast Corridor-Baltimore/Washington tower network. Anna Karion 1 , Israel Lopez Coto 1 , Kimberly Mueller 1 , Subhomoy Ghosh 1 , Kuldeep Prasad 1 , Sharon Gourdji 1 , Tamae Wong 1 , James Whetstone 1 , Cory Martin 1,2 , Chris Sloop 3 , Bill Callahan 3 , Steve Prinzivalli 3 1 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 2 University of Maryland, College Park, MD 3 Earth Networks, Inc., Germantown, MD Network design study (OSSE) for locating 12 urban tower sites Fossil CO 2 emissions were sampled using WRF-STILT footprints from candidate tower sites to create synthetic observations. Clustering approach was used to place the towers by maximizing differences between signals (Lopez Coto et al., 2016). An OSSE was conducted to identify optimal location for towers that characterize incoming air flow (i.e. Background), shown as gray triangles in Figure 1. Analysis showed the need for a more sophisticated background analysis than has been established in previous urban studies. If the background tower data is used alone, the variability will not be captured due to strong upwind sources in this region (Mueller et al., in prep). 3. Network Design Study: Background sites Figure 4: Predicted CO 2 signal from sources outside the innermost domain as advected to three of the urban towers, showing large variability of this “background” signal. Figure 3: Vulcan (Gurney et al) fossil CO 2 emissions shown along with NEC-BW flux estimation domain (inner red square) and outer domain of influence (larger red square) considered in this study. In the OSSE, CO 2 fluxes in the outer domain were sampled by WRF-STILT footprints for towers inside the innermost domain to replicate a “background” signal. Sites surrounding the inner domain were chosen based on their ability to sample this variability. NEC inner domain DCO 2 (ppm) JES ARL HAL (mid-afternoon hours only) February 2013 Uncertainty reduction from inversion using synthetic observations from 12 ideal candidate sites under a conservative assumption on model errors (5 ppm).

Greenhouse gas observations in the North-East Corridor … · 2017. 6. 6. · MD (BUC), and the rooftop of Earth Networks Headquarters in Germantown, MD (AWS). Germantown (AWS) is

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Greenhouse gas observations in the North-East Corridor … · 2017. 6. 6. · MD (BUC), and the rooftop of Earth Networks Headquarters in Germantown, MD (AWS). Germantown (AWS) is

1.Background:NISTUrbanTestbedsandtheNECTheNISTurbandomeprogramcurrentlyfundsthreeurban

testbeds,designedtodevelopandtestmethodsforgreenhousegasemissionsestimationinurbanregions:Indianapolis(INFLUX,influx.psu.edu),LosAngeles,(megacities.jpl.nasa.gov),andtheNorth-EastCorridor:Baltimore/Washington(NEC-BW).Allthreetestbedsincludecontinuousin-situmeasurementsofcarbondioxide(CO2)andmethane(CH4)fromtowersandrooftopsintheurbanareas.TheLAandNEC-BWnetworksuseidenticaldataprocessing,dataflaggingandfiltering,calibration,anduncertaintyestimationtechniques,inanefforttostandardizetheseoperations(Verhulst etal,2016;Welp etal.,2013).

TheNEC-BWprojectisacollaborationbetweenNIST,theUniversityofMaryland,ArizonaStateUniversity,EarthNetworks,NOAA,andothers,andincludesairbornecampaignsintheregion(FLAGG-MD,http://aosc.umd.edu/~flaggmd/),meso-scaleandinversemodeling,inventorydevelopment(Hestia),andin-situobservations.Herewepresentsomeinitialresultsfromthein-situNEC-BWnetwork.Currentlythisnetworkconsistsof2existinglong-termEarthNetworkssites(BUCandAWS)and6sitesthathavebeenestablishedsinceOct.2015.Threeofthese(HAL,ARL,andNDC)havebeenoperationalfor>1year.6additionalurbansitesareplannedintheDCarea,alongwith4sitestohelpestablishbackgroundconditions.

(mapsfromGoogle)

GreenhousegasobservationsintheNorth-EastCorridor(Baltimore-WashingtonDC)

NACPAll-InvestigatorsMeetingMarch2017

CARVE

BUC

Code EN Code Location Name Lat Lon Top inlet height (agl)

BUC GHG01 Bucktown, MD 38.46 -76.04 105 m

AWS AWSHQ Germantown, MD 39.20 -77.26 40 m (roof)

HAL GHG48 Halethorpe, MD 39.26 -76.68 58 m

ARL GHG55 Arlington, VA 38.89 -77.13 92 m

NDC GHG56 Northwest, Washington, DC 38.95 -77.08 91 m

NEB GHG58 Northeast Baltimore, MD 39.34 -76.69 55 m

NWB GHG59 Northwest Baltimore, MD 39.32 -76.58 67 m

JES GHG60 Jessup, MD 39.17 -76.78 91 m

JES

AWS

ARL

NDCNEB

NWB

HAL 6.DiurnalCycles&VerticalGradient

BUC

2.NetworkDesignStudy:Urbansites

Sensitivity (monthly average footprint from network)

Figure2:Monthlyaveragesensitivitytofluxes(top)anduncertaintyreduction(bottom)oftheoptimized12towerlocationsinFebruary(left)andJuly(right)2013.

February July

4.CO2 andCH4 Observations

Figure5:MonthlyaverageCO2 (top)andCH4(bottom)atNEC-BWnetworksites(toplevel,allhours).SeeFig.1andTableforsitelocations.

Figure6:Monthlymeanswereaveragedtogetherfor2012-2016(aftersubtractingtheannualglobalgrowthratefromNOAA)toobtainaverageannualcyclesforCO2 (top)andCH4 (bottom)fromBucktown,MD(BUC),andtherooftopofEarthNetworksHeadquartersinGermantown,MD(AWS).

Germantown(AWS)isasuburbofWashington,DCandclosetoamajorhighway.Bucktown(BUC)isontheruralEasternShoreofMaryland,~100kmfromWashingtonDCbutneartheChesapeakeBayandnexttotheBlackwaterNationalWildlifeRefuge,alow-elevationwetlandareawithmanypondsandstreams.HighCH4 atBUCinsummermonths(Fig.6)islikelyindicativeoflocalwetlandemissions.Otherwise,CO2 andCH4 molefractionsareconsistentlyloweratBUCthanothersites.ThemorerecentlyestablishedsitesintheurbannetworkshowmonthlymeansthataresimilartothoseatAWS.

FormoreinformationoraccesstodatafromNEC-BW,[email protected]

References• Verhulst,K.etal.,“CarbonDioxideandMethaneMeasurementsfromtheLosAngelesMegacityCarbonProject:1.Calibration,UrbanEnhancements,andUncertaintyEstimates”,Atmos.Chem.AndPhys.Discuss.,doi:10.5194/acp-2016-850,2016.

• LopezCoto etal.,2016,“Tower-BasedGreenhouseGasMeasurementNetworkDesign”,doi 10.1007/s00376-017-6094-6.

ThisworkwassupportedbytheNISTGreenhouseGasMeasurementsProgram.

Figure7:Averagediurnalcycle(averagedover2016)fromeachlevel.

AlltheNEC-BWsites,withtheexceptionoftherooftopatAWS,sampleattwoinletheights(levels).Herewelookatthediurnalcycle(averagedover2016)fromeachlevel.Atmostsites,theverticalgradientisverysmallorclosetozeroduringtheperiodfrom12-16localstandardtime.ThisindicatesthatdespitetheircloseproximitytoCO2 andCH4 sources,thetowersaregenerallyhighenoughtoobservearelativelywell-mixedsignalduringthemid-afternoonhoursoftheday.

Figure1:MapofNortheastCorridor-Baltimore/Washingtontowernetwork.

AnnaKarion1,IsraelLopezCoto1,KimberlyMueller1,Subhomoy Ghosh1,Kuldeep Prasad1,SharonGourdji1,TamaeWong1,JamesWhetstone1,CoryMartin1,2,ChrisSloop3,BillCallahan3,StevePrinzivalli3

1NationalInstituteofStandardsandTechnology,Gaithersburg,MD2UniversityofMaryland,CollegePark,MD3EarthNetworks,Inc.,Germantown,MD

• Networkdesignstudy(OSSE)forlocating12urbantowersites• FossilCO2 emissionsweresampledusingWRF-STILTfootprintsfromcandidatetowersitestocreatesyntheticobservations.

• Clusteringapproachwasusedtoplacethetowersbymaximizingdifferencesbetweensignals(LopezCotoetal.,2016).

AnOSSEwasconductedtoidentifyoptimallocationfortowersthatcharacterizeincomingairflow(i.e.Background),shownasgraytrianglesinFigure1.Analysisshowedtheneedforamoresophisticatedbackgroundanalysisthanhasbeenestablishedinpreviousurbanstudies.Ifthebackgroundtowerdataisusedalone,thevariabilitywillnotbecapturedduetostrongupwindsourcesinthisregion(Muelleretal.,inprep).

3.NetworkDesignStudy:Backgroundsites

Figure4:PredictedCO2signalfromsourcesoutsidetheinnermostdomainasadvectedtothreeoftheurbantowers,showinglargevariabilityofthis“background”signal.

Figure3:Vulcan(Gurneyetal)fossilCO2emissionsshownalongwithNEC-BWfluxestimationdomain(innerredsquare)andouterdomainofinfluence(largerredsquare)consideredinthisstudy.IntheOSSE,CO2 fluxesintheouterdomainweresampledbyWRF-STILTfootprintsfortowersinsidetheinnermostdomaintoreplicatea“background”signal.Sitessurroundingtheinnerdomainwerechosenbasedontheirabilitytosamplethisvariability.

NEC inner domain

DC

O2

(ppm

)

JESARLHAL

(mid-afternoon hours only)

February 2013

Uncertainty reduction from inversion using synthetic observations from 12 ideal candidate sites under a conservative assumption on model errors (5 ppm).