49
Graph Fourier Transform Prof. Luis Gustavo Nonato SME/ICMC - USP August 29, 2017

Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform

Prof. Luis Gustavo Nonato

SME/ICMC - USP

August 29, 2017

Page 2: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform

From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of agraph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivatingthe development of graph-based Fourier analysis theory.

A major obstacle to the development of a graph signalprocessing theory is the irregular and coordinate-free nature ofa graph domain.

For instance, signal translation is basic operation for signalprocessing. However, that operation is not naturallyimplemented in graph domains.

Page 3: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform

From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of agraph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivatingthe development of graph-based Fourier analysis theory.

A major obstacle to the development of a graph signalprocessing theory is the irregular and coordinate-free nature ofa graph domain.

For instance, signal translation is basic operation for signalprocessing. However, that operation is not naturallyimplemented in graph domains.

Page 4: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform

From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of agraph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivatingthe development of graph-based Fourier analysis theory.

A major obstacle to the development of a graph signalprocessing theory is the irregular and coordinate-free nature ofa graph domain.

For instance, signal translation is basic operation for signalprocessing. However, that operation is not naturallyimplemented in graph domains.

Page 5: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform

Let G = (V, E) be a weighted graph, L be its correspondinggraph Laplacian, and f : V → R a function defined on thevertices of G.

Graph Fourier TransformThe Graph Fourier Transform of f is defined as

GF [f ](λl) = f (λl) =< f , ul >=n

∑i=1

f (i)ul(i)

Inverse Graph Fourier TransformThe Inverse Graph Fourier Transform is given by

IGF [f ](i) = f (i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (λl)ul(i)

Page 6: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform

Let G = (V, E) be a weighted graph, L be its correspondinggraph Laplacian, and f : V → R a function defined on thevertices of G.

Graph Fourier TransformThe Graph Fourier Transform of f is defined as

GF [f ](λl) = f (λl) =< f , ul >=n

∑i=1

f (i)ul(i)

Inverse Graph Fourier TransformThe Inverse Graph Fourier Transform is given by

IGF [f ](i) = f (i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (λl)ul(i)

Page 7: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform

Let G = (V, E) be a weighted graph, L be its correspondinggraph Laplacian, and f : V → R a function defined on thevertices of G.

Graph Fourier TransformThe Graph Fourier Transform of f is defined as

GF [f ](λl) = f (λl) =< f , ul >=n

∑i=1

f (i)ul(i)

Inverse Graph Fourier TransformThe Inverse Graph Fourier Transform is given by

IGF [f ](i) = f (i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (λl)ul(i)

Page 8: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform

f (λl) =n

∑i=1

f (i)ul(i)

The eigenvalues of L play the role of frequencies and theeigenvectors the Fourier basis.

The graph Fourier transform (and its inverse) gives a way torepresent a signal in two different domains: the vertex domainand the graph spectral domain.

Page 9: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform

f (λl) =n

∑i=1

f (i)ul(i)

The eigenvalues of L play the role of frequencies and theeigenvectors the Fourier basis.

The graph Fourier transform (and its inverse) gives a way torepresent a signal in two different domains: the vertex domainand the graph spectral domain.

Page 10: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Synthesizing Signals

f (i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (λl)ul(i)

Page 11: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Synthesizing Signals

f (i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (λl) ul(i)⇒ f (i) =n−1

∑l=0

g(λl)ul(i)

We can generate signals in the graph domain by using a kernelin the spectral domain.

Page 12: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Synthesizing Signals

f (i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (λl) ul(i)⇒ f (i) =n−1

∑l=0

g(λl)ul(i)

We can generate signals in the graph domain by using a kernelin the spectral domain.

Page 13: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Filtering

In classical signal processing, frequency filtering is given byamplifying or attenuating the contributions of some FourierBasis.

L[f ] = f ∗ h→ F [f ∗ h] = f h

Taking the IGFT

L[f ](i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (λl)h(λl)ul(i) (1)

Suppose h(λl) = ∑Kk=0 akλk

l (polynomial on the spectral domain)

Replacing h(λl) and the definition of f (λl) in Eq. (1) we get

L[f ](i) =n

∑j=1

f (j)K

∑k=0

ak

n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

Page 14: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Filtering

In classical signal processing, frequency filtering is given byamplifying or attenuating the contributions of some FourierBasis.

L[f ] = f ∗ h→ F [f ∗ h] = f h

Taking the IGFT

L[f ](i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (λl)h(λl)ul(i) (1)

Suppose h(λl) = ∑Kk=0 akλk

l (polynomial on the spectral domain)

Replacing h(λl) and the definition of f (λl) in Eq. (1) we get

L[f ](i) =n

∑j=1

f (j)K

∑k=0

ak

n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

Page 15: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Filtering

In classical signal processing, frequency filtering is given byamplifying or attenuating the contributions of some FourierBasis.

L[f ] = f ∗ h→ F [f ∗ h] = f h

Taking the IGFT

L[f ](i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (λl)h(λl)ul(i) (1)

Suppose h(λl) = ∑Kk=0 akλk

l (polynomial on the spectral domain)

Replacing h(λl) and the definition of f (λl) in Eq. (1) we get

L[f ](i) =n

∑j=1

f (j)K

∑k=0

ak

n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

Page 16: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Filtering

L[f ](i) =n

∑j=1

f (j)K

∑k=0

ak

n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

(Lk)ij =n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

It can be shown that (Lk)ij = 0 when the shortest distancebetween nodes i and j is greater than k.Defining

bij =K

∑k=0

ak Lkij

L[f ](i) =n

∑j∈Nk(i)

bijf (j)

Therefore, when the filter is a polynomial in the spectral domain, the filteredsignal in each node i is a linear combination of the original signal in theneighborhood of i.

Page 17: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Filtering

L[f ](i) =n

∑j=1

f (j)K

∑k=0

ak

n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

(Lk)ij =n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

It can be shown that (Lk)ij = 0 when the shortest distancebetween nodes i and j is greater than k.Defining

bij =K

∑k=0

ak Lkij

L[f ](i) =n

∑j∈Nk(i)

bijf (j)

Therefore, when the filter is a polynomial in the spectral domain, the filteredsignal in each node i is a linear combination of the original signal in theneighborhood of i.

Page 18: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Filtering

L[f ](i) =n

∑j=1

f (j)K

∑k=0

ak

n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

(Lk)ij =n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

It can be shown that (Lk)ij = 0 when the shortest distancebetween nodes i and j is greater than k.

Defining

bij =K

∑k=0

ak Lkij

L[f ](i) =n

∑j∈Nk(i)

bijf (j)

Therefore, when the filter is a polynomial in the spectral domain, the filteredsignal in each node i is a linear combination of the original signal in theneighborhood of i.

Page 19: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Filtering

L[f ](i) =n

∑j=1

f (j)K

∑k=0

ak

n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

(Lk)ij =n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

It can be shown that (Lk)ij = 0 when the shortest distancebetween nodes i and j is greater than k.Defining

bij =K

∑k=0

ak Lkij

L[f ](i) =n

∑j∈Nk(i)

bijf (j)

Therefore, when the filter is a polynomial in the spectral domain, the filteredsignal in each node i is a linear combination of the original signal in theneighborhood of i.

Page 20: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Filtering

L[f ](i) =n

∑j=1

f (j)K

∑k=0

ak

n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

(Lk)ij =n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

It can be shown that (Lk)ij = 0 when the shortest distancebetween nodes i and j is greater than k.Defining

bij =K

∑k=0

ak Lkij

L[f ](i) =n

∑j∈Nk(i)

bijf (j)

Therefore, when the filter is a polynomial in the spectral domain, the filteredsignal in each node i is a linear combination of the original signal in theneighborhood of i.

Page 21: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Filtering

L[f ](i) =n

∑j=1

f (j)K

∑k=0

ak

n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

(Lk)ij =n

∑l=1

λkl ul(j)ul(i)

It can be shown that (Lk)ij = 0 when the shortest distancebetween nodes i and j is greater than k.Defining

bij =K

∑k=0

ak Lkij

L[f ](i) =n

∑j∈Nk(i)

bijf (j)

Therefore, when the filter is a polynomial in the spectral domain, the filteredsignal in each node i is a linear combination of the original signal in theneighborhood of i.

Page 22: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Convolution

The definition of convolution between two functions f and g is

(f ∗ g)(x) =∫ ∞

−∞f (x− t)g(t)dt

Such definition can not be directly applied because the shiftf (x− t) (or singal translation) is not defined in the context ofgraphs.

However, convolution can be defined as:

(f ∗ g) = IGF [GF [(f ∗ g)]]

(f ∗ g)(i) =n

∑l=1

f (λl)g(λl)ul(i)

Page 23: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Convolution

The definition of convolution between two functions f and g is

(f ∗ g)(x) =∫ ∞

−∞f (x− t)g(t)dt

Such definition can not be directly applied because the shiftf (x− t) (or singal translation) is not defined in the context ofgraphs.

However, convolution can be defined as:

(f ∗ g) = IGF [GF [(f ∗ g)]]

(f ∗ g)(i) =n

∑l=1

f (λl)g(λl)ul(i)

Page 24: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Convolution

The definition of convolution between two functions f and g is

(f ∗ g)(x) =∫ ∞

−∞f (x− t)g(t)dt

Such definition can not be directly applied because the shiftf (x− t) (or singal translation) is not defined in the context ofgraphs.

However, convolution can be defined as:

(f ∗ g) = IGF [GF [(f ∗ g)]]

(f ∗ g)(i) =n

∑l=1

f (λl)g(λl)ul(i)

Page 25: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Convolution

The definition of convolution between two functions f and g is

(f ∗ g)(x) =∫ ∞

−∞f (x− t)g(t)dt

Such definition can not be directly applied because the shiftf (x− t) (or singal translation) is not defined in the context ofgraphs.

However, convolution can be defined as:

(f ∗ g) = IGF [GF [(f ∗ g)]]

(f ∗ g)(i) =n

∑l=1

f (λl)g(λl)ul(i)

Page 26: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Convolution

The definition of convolution between two functions f and g is

(f ∗ g)(x) =∫ ∞

−∞f (x− t)g(t)dt

Such definition can not be directly applied because the shiftf (x− t) (or singal translation) is not defined in the context ofgraphs.

However, convolution can be defined as:

(f ∗ g) = IGF [GF [(f ∗ g)]]

(f ∗ g)(i) =n

∑l=1

f (λl)g(λl)ul(i)

Page 27: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Convolution

Some properties of the convolution:

f ∗ g = f gf ∗ g = g ∗ ff ∗ (g + h) = f ∗ g + f ∗ h

∑ni=1(f ∗ g)(i) =

√n f (0)g(0)

Page 28: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Convolution

Some properties of the convolution:

f ∗ g = f g

f ∗ g = g ∗ ff ∗ (g + h) = f ∗ g + f ∗ h

∑ni=1(f ∗ g)(i) =

√n f (0)g(0)

Page 29: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Convolution

Some properties of the convolution:

f ∗ g = f gf ∗ g = g ∗ f

f ∗ (g + h) = f ∗ g + f ∗ h

∑ni=1(f ∗ g)(i) =

√n f (0)g(0)

Page 30: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Convolution

Some properties of the convolution:

f ∗ g = f gf ∗ g = g ∗ ff ∗ (g + h) = f ∗ g + f ∗ h

∑ni=1(f ∗ g)(i) =

√n f (0)g(0)

Page 31: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Convolution

Some properties of the convolution:

f ∗ g = f gf ∗ g = g ∗ ff ∗ (g + h) = f ∗ g + f ∗ h

∑ni=1(f ∗ g)(i) =

√n f (0)g(0)

Page 32: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Translation

The classical translation

(Tt f )(x) = f (x− t)

can not be directly generalized to the graph setting.

However, translation can be seen as a convolution with thedelta function

(Tt f )(x) = (f ∗ δt)(x)

Recalling that F [δ(t− a)](λ) = e−i2πλa, we define translation toa vertex j as

(Tj f )(i) =√

n(f ∗ δj)(i) =√

nn−1

∑l=0

f (λl)ul(j)ul(i)

The normalizing constant√

n ensures that the translationoperator preserves the mean of a signal, i.e.,∑n

i=1(Tj f )(i) = ∑ni=1 f (i)

Page 33: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: TranslationThe classical translation

(Tt f )(x) = f (x− t)

can not be directly generalized to the graph setting.

However, translation can be seen as a convolution with thedelta function

(Tt f )(x) = (f ∗ δt)(x)

Recalling that F [δ(t− a)](λ) = e−i2πλa, we define translation toa vertex j as

(Tj f )(i) =√

n(f ∗ δj)(i) =√

nn−1

∑l=0

f (λl)ul(j)ul(i)

The normalizing constant√

n ensures that the translationoperator preserves the mean of a signal, i.e.,∑n

i=1(Tj f )(i) = ∑ni=1 f (i)

Page 34: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: TranslationThe classical translation

(Tt f )(x) = f (x− t)

can not be directly generalized to the graph setting.

However, translation can be seen as a convolution with thedelta function

(Tt f )(x) = (f ∗ δt)(x)

Recalling that F [δ(t− a)](λ) = e−i2πλa, we define translation toa vertex j as

(Tj f )(i) =√

n(f ∗ δj)(i) =√

nn−1

∑l=0

f (λl)ul(j)ul(i)

The normalizing constant√

n ensures that the translationoperator preserves the mean of a signal, i.e.,∑n

i=1(Tj f )(i) = ∑ni=1 f (i)

Page 35: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: TranslationThe classical translation

(Tt f )(x) = f (x− t)

can not be directly generalized to the graph setting.

However, translation can be seen as a convolution with thedelta function

(Tt f )(x) = (f ∗ δt)(x)

Recalling that F [δ(t− a)](λ) = e−i2πλa, we define translation toa vertex j as

(Tj f )(i) =√

n(f ∗ δj)(i) =√

nn−1

∑l=0

f (λl)ul(j)ul(i)

The normalizing constant√

n ensures that the translationoperator preserves the mean of a signal, i.e.,∑n

i=1(Tj f )(i) = ∑ni=1 f (i)

Page 36: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: TranslationThe classical translation

(Tt f )(x) = f (x− t)

can not be directly generalized to the graph setting.

However, translation can be seen as a convolution with thedelta function

(Tt f )(x) = (f ∗ δt)(x)

Recalling that F [δ(t− a)](λ) = e−i2πλa, we define translation toa vertex j as

(Tj f )(i) =√

n(f ∗ δj)(i) =√

nn−1

∑l=0

f (λl)ul(j)ul(i)

The normalizing constant√

n ensures that the translationoperator preserves the mean of a signal, i.e.,∑n

i=1(Tj f )(i) = ∑ni=1 f (i)

Page 37: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Translation

Some properties of translationTj(f ∗ g) = (Tj f ) ∗ g = f ∗ (Tj g)

Tj Tk f = Tk Tj f

∑ni=1(Tj f )(i) =

√n f (0) = ∑n

i=1 f (i)‖Tj f‖ 6= ‖f‖ (the energy of the signal is not preserved)

Page 38: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Translation

Some properties of translationTj(f ∗ g) = (Tj f ) ∗ g = f ∗ (Tj g)Tj Tk f = Tk Tj f

∑ni=1(Tj f )(i) =

√n f (0) = ∑n

i=1 f (i)‖Tj f‖ 6= ‖f‖ (the energy of the signal is not preserved)

Page 39: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Translation

Some properties of translationTj(f ∗ g) = (Tj f ) ∗ g = f ∗ (Tj g)Tj Tk f = Tk Tj f

∑ni=1(Tj f )(i) =

√n f (0) = ∑n

i=1 f (i)

‖Tj f‖ 6= ‖f‖ (the energy of the signal is not preserved)

Page 40: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Translation

Some properties of translationTj(f ∗ g) = (Tj f ) ∗ g = f ∗ (Tj g)Tj Tk f = Tk Tj f

∑ni=1(Tj f )(i) =

√n f (0) = ∑n

i=1 f (i)‖Tj f‖ 6= ‖f‖ (the energy of the signal is not preserved)

Page 41: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Dilation

(Ds f )(x) =1s

f (1s) =⇒ (Ds f )(λ) = f (sλ)

in the graph setting, ts is not well defined, impairing the direct

generalization of dilation in the graph domain.

An alternative is to define dilation via GFT:

(Ds f )(i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (s · λl)ul(i)

Notice that f (s · λl) might not be in the interval [0, λn].Therefore, dilation can only be used when f is generated from akernel defined in the whole spectral domain.

Page 42: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Dilation

(Ds f )(x) =1s

f (1s) =⇒ (Ds f )(λ) = f (sλ)

in the graph setting, ts is not well defined, impairing the direct

generalization of dilation in the graph domain.

An alternative is to define dilation via GFT:

(Ds f )(i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (s · λl)ul(i)

Notice that f (s · λl) might not be in the interval [0, λn].Therefore, dilation can only be used when f is generated from akernel defined in the whole spectral domain.

Page 43: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Dilation

(Ds f )(x) =1s

f (1s) =⇒ (Ds f )(λ) = f (sλ)

in the graph setting, ts is not well defined, impairing the direct

generalization of dilation in the graph domain.

An alternative is to define dilation via GFT:

(Ds f )(i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (s · λl)ul(i)

Notice that f (s · λl) might not be in the interval [0, λn].Therefore, dilation can only be used when f is generated from akernel defined in the whole spectral domain.

Page 44: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Dilation

(Ds f )(x) =1s

f (1s) =⇒ (Ds f )(λ) = f (sλ)

in the graph setting, ts is not well defined, impairing the direct

generalization of dilation in the graph domain.

An alternative is to define dilation via GFT:

(Ds f )(i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (s · λl)ul(i)

Notice that f (s · λl) might not be in the interval [0, λn].

Therefore, dilation can only be used when f is generated from akernel defined in the whole spectral domain.

Page 45: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Dilation

(Ds f )(x) =1s

f (1s) =⇒ (Ds f )(λ) = f (sλ)

in the graph setting, ts is not well defined, impairing the direct

generalization of dilation in the graph domain.

An alternative is to define dilation via GFT:

(Ds f )(i) =n−1

∑l=0

f (s · λl)ul(i)

Notice that f (s · λl) might not be in the interval [0, λn].Therefore, dilation can only be used when f is generated from akernel defined in the whole spectral domain.

Page 46: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Modulation

Continous case:Mλ f (t) = e−(2πiλt) f (t)

In the graph setting we can define

Mλl f (i) =√

n ul(i)f (i)

In contrast to the continous case, modulation in the graphsetting does not correspond to a translation in the spectraldomain.However, if f is generated from a kernel localized in 0, thanMλl f (i) is concentrated in λl.

Page 47: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Modulation

Continous case:Mλ f (t) = e−(2πiλt) f (t)

In the graph setting we can define

Mλl f (i) =√

n ul(i)f (i)

In contrast to the continous case, modulation in the graphsetting does not correspond to a translation in the spectraldomain.However, if f is generated from a kernel localized in 0, thanMλl f (i) is concentrated in λl.

Page 48: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Modulation

Continous case:Mλ f (t) = e−(2πiλt) f (t)

In the graph setting we can define

Mλl f (i) =√

n ul(i)f (i)

In contrast to the continous case, modulation in the graphsetting does not correspond to a translation in the spectraldomain.

However, if f is generated from a kernel localized in 0, thanMλl f (i) is concentrated in λl.

Page 49: Graph Fourier TransformGraph Fourier Transform From previous classes we learned that the eigenvectors of a graph Laplacian behave similarly to a Fourier basis, motivating the development

Graph Fourier Transform: Modulation

Continous case:Mλ f (t) = e−(2πiλt) f (t)

In the graph setting we can define

Mλl f (i) =√

n ul(i)f (i)

In contrast to the continous case, modulation in the graphsetting does not correspond to a translation in the spectraldomain.However, if f is generated from a kernel localized in 0, thanMλl f (i) is concentrated in λl.