29
Globular cluster Messier 2 by Hubble Space Telescope.. Located in the constellation of Aquarius, also known as NGC 7089. M2 contains about a million stars and is located in the halo of our Milky Way galaxy. Granularity effects Marieke de Loos Steinar Wouters Edgar Vredenbregt Jom Luiten Eindhoven University The Netherlands Bas van der Geer

Granularity effects

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Granularity effects

Globular cluster Messier 2 by Hubble Space Telescope.. Located in the constellation of Aquarius, also known as NGC 7089.M2 contains about a million stars and is located in the halo of our Milky Way galaxy.

Granularity effects

Marieke de LoosSteinar WoutersEdgar VredenbregtJom Luiten

Eindhoven UniversityThe Netherlands

Bas van der Geer

Page 2: Granularity effects

Ultracold Electron/Ion Source

2

Trap & CoolMagneto-optical trapDensity ≈ 1016 / m3

RMS size ≈ 1 mmT = 100 µK

IonizeUltracold plasmaIonization radius ≈ 50 µm

AccelerateUltracold sourceBunch energy E = 15 keV

Killian et al., PRL 83, 4776 (1999)

Luiten et al., PRL 95, 164801 (2005)McCulloch et al.,Nat. Phys. 7, 785 (2011)

Page 3: Granularity effects

Application: Ultrafast electron diffraction

• Structural dynamics• Resolve atomic length and time scales: ~1 Å, ~100 fs

Page 4: Granularity effects

Application: Focused ion beams (FIB)

SIM

SEM

Cross Section ImagingTEM sample preparation

Machining, sputtering/milling

Beam-induced deposition

Channeling contrast for crystalline grain analysis

(Logo) engraving

http://www.s3.infm.it/fib.html

Page 5: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nlLaser-cooled ion source

V

Ionization

Ultra-coldion beam

ExcitationR

a

d

σL

MOT parametersTemperature: 200 µKvth 0.22 m/sn 1018 m–3

Typical current: 10 pAR 13 µmσL 1.4 µm

GeometryV 2 kVd 20 mma 1 mm

Simple theory predicts total collapse of brightnessBut that is without acceleration…

Coulombinteractions

Page 6: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nlLaser-cooled ion source

MOT parametersTemperature: 200 µKvth 0.22 m/sn 1018 m–3

Typical current: 10 pAR 13 µmσL 1.4 µm

GeometryV 2 kVd 20 mma 1 mm

E1=1 MV/m

500 kV/m

200

100

50

2010 kV/m

E1=1 MV/m

500 kV/m

200 kV/m

100 kV/m

50 kV/m

20 kV/m

10 kV/m

Atomic beam limited

Disorder induced heating

Brig

htne

ssE

nerg

y sp

read

[eV

]

Page 7: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nlCoulomb interactions

x

pxSpace charge

Disorder induced heating

GPT simulations: n=1018 m–3

t=0

t=10 ps

t=20 psAll interactions

Ideal particle-in-Cell

Page 8: Granularity effects

Analogy of a cold beam

Rhône Glacier 2012: Bas van der Geer

Page 9: Granularity effects

We need to go inside

Page 10: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nlCoulomb interactions

Macroscopic (mean field):• Space-charge• Average repulsion force• Bunch expands• Deformations in phase-space• Governed by Poisson’s equation

Microscopic:• Disorder induced heating• Neighbouring particles ‘see’ each other• Potential energy → momentum spread• Stochastic effect• Governed by point-to-point interactions

Nature PhotonicsVol 2, May 2008

M. Centurion et. al.

And many others…

PRL 93, 094802O.J. Luiten et. al.

GPT simulations

JAP 102, 093501T. van Oudheusden et. al.

PRST-AB 9, 044203S.B. van der Geer et. al.

PRL 102, 034802 M. P. Reijnders et. al.

JAP 102, 094312 S.B. van der Geer et. al.

Page 11: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nlDisorder induced heating

Excess potentialenergy U

Momentumspread

Temperature ↑Brightness ↓

Randomprocesses

Coulombinteractions

High U Low U

x

px σpx

Page 12: Granularity effects

Nearest neighbor

w(r) dr: Probability that the nearest neighbor is between r and r+dr.

assuming a uniform random distribution with number density n.

Hence:

Stochastic problems in Physics and astronomy,Reviews of Modern Physics 15Chandrasekhar, 1943.

Page 13: Granularity effects

Where are my neighbors?

Average distance:

Most likely position:

Wigner-Seitz radius:

Page 14: Granularity effects

Potential energy

Average potential energy:

Potential energy at average position:

It’s the difference that matters:

GPT simulations

Simple theory

Tem

pera

ture

[K]

Page 15: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nlParadigm shift

Photo/thermionic emission

Space-charge• ‘Shaping’ the beam• Ellipsoidal bunches

Particle-in-Cell• Macro-particles• One species• Fluid assumption• Liouville holds• Convergent rms values

Laser cooled sources

Disorder induced heating• Fast acceleration• Breaking randomness

Tree-codes (B&H, FMM, P3M)• Every particle matters• Ions and electrons• Ab initio• No Liouville to the rescue• Divergent rms values

k Tphotogun >> 0.02 n1/3 q2 / ε0 >> k Tlaser-cooled

Page 16: Granularity effects

Application: Focused ion beam

• Aim: Lots of current at nm spotsizes• Design disaster: Beams heats up during acceleration

Page 17: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nl‘Typical’ simulation code: GPT

Tracks sample particles in time-domain• Relativistic equations of motion• Fully 3D, including all non-linear effects

• GPT solves with 5th order embedded Runge Kutta, adaptive stepsize• GPT can track ~106 particles on a PC with 1 GB memory• Challenge: E(r,t), B(r,t), flexibility without compromising accuracy

Analytical expressions Field-maps

External fields Coulomb interactions

Particle in Cell All interactions

{E,B}=f(x,y,z,t)

Page 18: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nlAlgorithms…

All interactions O(N2):• PP Particle-Particle → slow• P3M Particle-Particle Particle-Mesh Accuracy traded for speed:• B&H Barnes&hut tree: O(N log N)• FMM Fast-Multipole-Method: O(N)

• …

Imaga credit:Southern European observatory

Page 19: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nlBarnes-Hut

Hierarchical tree algorithm:• Includes all Coulomb interactions• O(N log N) in CPU time• User-selectable accuracy

Division of space Tree data structure

J. Barnes and P. Hut, Nature 324, (1986) p. 446.

Page 20: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nlGPT hardware requirements

GPT kernel:• Programming language: C and C++• Multi-core functionality: openMP• Distributed scans: MPI

If you can run Microsoft Office, you can track ~1M particles

Mac mini

HP blade server: 16 servers, 128 cores, 1.2 kW of GPT power!

1.2 kW

Page 21: Granularity effects

Application: Focused ion beam

• Aim: Lots of current at nm spotsizes• Design disaster: Beams heats up during acceleration• Multi-objective global optimization

Kalyanmoy Deb et. al., A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions On Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6, No. 2, A

Page 22: Granularity effects

Spo

tsiz

e [n

m]

Vobj

ectiv

e [k

V]

Page 23: Granularity effects

Spo

tsiz

e [n

m]

Vobj

ectiv

e [k

V]

Page 24: Granularity effects

Spo

tsiz

e [n

m]

Vobj

ectiv

e [k

V]

Page 25: Granularity effects

Spo

tsiz

e [n

m]

Vobj

ectiv

e [k

V]

Page 26: Granularity effects

Further slides are intentionally removed.

Page 27: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nlLaser-cooled e– source

Fields:Cavity field 20 MV/m rf-cavityDC offset 3 MV/m

Particles:Charge 0.1 pC (625k e-)Initial density 1018 / m3Ionization time 10 psInitial Temp 1 K

GPT tracking:- All particles- Realistic fields- All interactions

Page 28: Granularity effects

www.pulsar.nlLaser cooled e– diffraction

GPT results:εx 20 nm (rms)10% slice ~1 nm

Energy 120 keV Spread 1%εz 60 keV fs

Charge 0.1 pC (625,000 e–)

Ultracold Electron Source for Single-Shot, Ultrafast Electron DiffractionMicroscopy and Microanalysis 15, p. 282-289 (2009).S.B. van der Geer, M.J. de Loos, E.J.D. Vredenbregt, and O.J. Luiten

Page 29: Granularity effects

Conclusion

Granularity effects are becoming increasingly relevant• Physics: Nearest neighbor interaction

Design simulations need:• Sub-nm precision• Lots of particles for good statistics• All pair-wise Coulomb interactions• Start-to-end in 3D in complicated fields• Multi-objective optimizations

TODO! Break randomness in either space or time

✓ww

w.pu

lsar

.nl/g

pt