Upload
clarissa-wilkins
View
218
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and
Evaluation (GRADE) Methodology
Strength of Evidence
A (high) RCT
B (moderate) Downgraded RCT or upgraded observational studies
C (low) Well-done observational or cohort studies with controls
D (very low) Case series or expert opinion
BMJ 2008;336:924
Downgrading and Upgrading Evidence
RCT
• Poor quality of planning and implementation
• Inconsistency of results • Indirectness of evidence • Imprecision of results• High likelihood of reporting bias
ObservationalStudies
• Start with “low-quality” rating• Magnitude of effect is very large • Dose-response relation • All plausible biases would
decrease magnitude of apparent treatment effect
Strength of Recommendation
• Strong– Recommend– when virtually all informed patients would
choose the same management strategy• Weak (conditional)
– Suggest– imply that choices will differ across the range
of patient values and preferences
Factors That Influence Strength of Recommendation
What should be considered Recommended process
High or moderate evidence The higher the quality of evidence, the more likely is a strong recommendation
Certainty about the balance of benefits versus harms and burdens
The larger the difference between the desirable and undesirable consequences and the certainty around that difference, the more likely a strong recommendation. The smaller the net benefit and the lower the certainty for that benefit, the more likely is a weak recommendation.
Certainty in or similar values The more certainty or similarity in values and preferences, the more likely is a strong recommendation.
Resource implications The lower the cost of an intervention compared to the alternative and other costs related to the decision – that is, fewer resources consumed – the more likely is a strong recommendation.