(GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & …forestsclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Addinfo/0_0_51111121112171... · Thoughts Consultants Jaipur Pvt. Ltd. National Highways

Thoughts Consultants Jaipur Pvt. Ltd.

National Highways Authority of India

(GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS)

Construction of 4‐lane Road on NH‐12 (NewNH‐52) from Km 299/000 to 346/540

(Darah‐Jhalawar‐Teendhar section) in theState of Rajasthan under NHDP Phase-III on

Hybrid Annuity Mode Length 48.880 Km.)

Package-II

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

May, 2015

Prepared by

1 DA 15, JawaharNagar,Jaipur- 302004Phone: 0141- 4049864, 9829055330E mail: [email protected]

VOLUME IEXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Construction of 4‐lane Road on NH‐12 (New NH‐52) from Km 299/000 to346/540 (Darah‐Jhalawar‐Teendhar section) in the state of Rajasthan underNHDP Phase-III on Hybrid Annuity Mode

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Thoughts Consultants Jaipur Pvt. Ltd. Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 0.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................1

0.1 ABOUT NATIONAL HIGHWAY-12 (NEW NH 52) ......................................... 10.2 NEED OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................... 20.3 PROJECT ROAD .................................................................................................. 20.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF EXISTING PROJECT ................................................. 20.5 PRESENT TRAFFIC ............................................................................................. 60.6 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS .................................................................................... 7

0.6.1 Adopted Mode-Wise Growth Rates ............................................................ 7

0.6.2 Projected Total Traffic Volume on Homogeneous Sections ...................... 7

0.6.3 Capacity Analysis of the Homogeneous Sections ...................................... 7

0.7 SELECTION OF PROJECT ALIGNMENT ......................................................... 70.7.1 Package-I: Darah ROB to Amjhar river bridge (From Chainage289/500 Km. To 299/000 Km).................................................................................... 8

0.7.2 Package-II: From Amjhar bridge to Teendhar (From Chainage299/000 Km. To 346/540 Km).................................................................................... 8

0.8 COMPARISION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED ALIGNMENT OFPACKAGE-II ...................................................................................................... 10

0.9 ENGINEERING SURVEYS & INVESTIGATIONS FOR PACKAGE-II .......... 110.9.1 Topographic Surveys .................................................................................. 11

0.9.2 Sub Grade Investigations ........................................................................... 12

0.10 DESIGN PARAMETERS .................................................................................... 120.11 IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALS for package-II ................................................ 12

0.11.1 Proposed Cross Sections ............................................................................ 13

0.11.2 Flyovers /Vehicular Underpasses/ Overpasses ...................................... 28

0.11.3 Pedestrian Underpasses ............................................................................. 28

0.11.4 Service Road/ Slip Road ............................................................................ 29

0.11.5 Cross Drainage Structures ......................................................................... 30

0.11.6 Rail over Bridge (ROB)/ Rail under Bridge.............................................. 31

0.11.7 Flyover ......................................................................................................... 31

0.11.8 Pavment Design .......................................................................................... 32

0.11.9 Intersections and Grade Separators .......................................................... 32

0.11.10 Drainage ...................................................................................................... 32

0.11.11 Protections Works ....................................................................................... 33

0.11.12 Retaining Wall/ Breast Wall ...................................................................... 33


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Thoughts Consultants Jaipur Pvt. Ltd. Page ii

0.11.13 Project Facilities .......................................................................................... 33

0.12 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL ......................................................................... 340.13 ENVIRONMENTAL FOREST & WILDLIFE ISSUES ...................................... 340.14 LAND ACQUISITION & RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN ........................ 350.15 PROJECT COST ESTIMATES............................................................................ 35

0.15.1 Rate analaysis .............................................................................................. 35

0.15.2 Quantities .................................................................................................... 35

0.15.3 Cost Estimates ............................................................................................. 35

0.16 IMPLEMENTATION OPTIONS ....................................................................... 36


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Thoughts Consultants Jaipur Pvt. Ltd. Page iii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 0-1: Details of NH 12 in State of Rajasthan 2

Table 0-2: Location of Built-Up Sections Along existing NH-12 1

Table 0-3: Salient Features of Existing Road 2

Table 0-4: Annual Average Daily Traffic 6

Table 0-5: Traffic Compositions (By Number) 6

Table 0-6: Summary of Projected Total Traffic Volume 7

Table 0-7: Design Service Volume of Four Lane Highway 7

Table 0-8: Comparison of Existing and Proposed alignment of Package-II10

Table 0-9: Design Parameters 12

Table 0-10: Summary of Proposed Cross Sections 13

Table 0-11: Summary of Proposed Cross-sections 15

Table 0-12: The proposed location of the VUP/LVUP Flyover inPackage-II 28

Table 0-13: The proposed location of the PUP in Package-II 29

Table 0-14: Details of locations of the proposed slip Road 29

Table 0-15: Details of Connecting Road 29

Table 0-16: Details of Proposed Major Bridges 30

Table 0-17: Details of Proposed Minor Bridges 30

Table 0-18: Details of new Box Culverts under Project Scope 30

Table 0-19: Details of New Pipe Culverts under Project Scope 31

Table 0-20: Proposed Pavement Composition for Main Carriage way 32

Table 0-21: Proposed Pavement Composition for Slip Roads & CrossRoad 32

Table 0-22: Summary of Cost Estimates 35


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Thoughts Consultants Jaipur Pvt. Ltd. Page iv

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 0-1: Index Map of National Highway 52 1

Figure 0-2: Index Map of National Highway 12 in Rajasthan 2

Figure 0-3: Index Map of Project Road 1

Figure 0-4: The existing NH-12 Darah-Jhalawar-Teendhar Section of NH-

12 1

Figure 0-5: The photographs of existing road 3

Figure 0-6: Poor Geometric Conditions 3

Figure 0-7: Pavement Condition of Project Road 4

Figure 0-8: Photos of Bridges & Cross-Drainage 5

Figure 0-9: Map of Approved Alignment 10

Figure 0-10: Proposed Cross Section DetailsError! Bookmark notdefined.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Thoughts Consultants Jaipur Pvt. Ltd Page 1

CHAPTER 0.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

0.1 ABOUT NATIONAL HIGHWAY-12 (NEW NH 52)

The old National Highway 12 runs through two big states Rajasthan and MadhyaPradesh.The total length of the old NH- 12 was 897/00 Km. The length of Old NH 12was 408/700 Km in the state of Rajasthan. Recently MORTH has amended thenumber and length of the National highways. The old NH 12in the state of Rajasthanhas become the part of the New National highway 52. The New NH 52 starting fromits junction with NH-7 near Sangrur in the state of Punjab connecting Narwana, Hisarin the state of Haryana, Fatehpur, Jaipur, Tonk, Kota, Aklera in the state ofRajasthan, Rajgarh, Biora, Dewas, Indore, Sendhwa in the state of Madhya Pradesh,Dhule, Aurangabad, bed, Osmanabad, Solapur in the state of Maharastra, Bijapur,Hubli and terminating at its junction with NH-66 near Ankola in the state of Karnatka.The map of New NH 52 is given in the following figure

Figure 0-1: Index Map of National Highway 52The Project stretch Darah-Teendharis connected to Jaipur at one end and it isconnected to Bhopal at the other end. The project highway is very important highwayas it connects the Capital of Rajasthan states and National capital of country throughJaipur- Delhi Highway. The map of the Old NH-12 is given in figure below.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Ministry of Road Transport and Highway (MORTH) has taken up the expansion andwidening of NH-12 in the State of Rajasthan. The development of NH-12 (New 52)has been taken-up in five parts.

Table 0-1: Details of NH 12 in State of Rajasthan

Sr.No.

Stretch Length ( Km.) Present Status

1 Jaipur-Devli 163.00 The link has already beendeveloped on BOT basis andcommercial operation hasalready started

2 Devli-Kota 82+12 KmBypass.

The link has already beendeveloped on BOT basis andcommercial operation hasalready started. The 12 Km. linkfrom Kota bypass to Jhalawarroad has already developed aspart of East-West Corridor.

3 Kota –Darah 33.00 The link under constructionstage.

4 Darah-Teendhar 57.04 The preparation of DPR of thislink has given under thisconsultancy

5 Teendhar –StateBorder

62.16 The link has already beendeveloped on EPC basis andcommercial operation hasalready started.

0.2 NEED OF THE PROJECT

The project highway is very important highway as it connects to two state Rajasthanand Madhya Pradesh. The Darah-Jhalawar-Teendhar section of National Highwayhas moderate traffic density. In addition to this there are few sections wherealignment needs geometric improvements to maintain riding quality of highway andsafe movement of vehicles. Apart from this the present alignment of NH is passingthrough various congested towns and villages. All of the above factors aredemanding the 2-lane existing highway need to be developed as 4-lane dividedcarriageway with bypass provisions in congested towns/ villages.

0.3 PROJECT ROAD

The Project Highway traverses through two districts viz. Kota and Jhalawar inRajasthan State. The project study corridor starts at the end of ROB approach nearto Darah at km 289+500 and passes through five major towns Darah, Sarvada,Dabadeh, Suket and Jhalawar, and It ends at the Teendhar at Existing km 346.540Km. Existing road width is 2 lane standard. The Project Highway passes throughDarah Wildlife Sanctuary where the terrain is Hilly. The Existing ROW varies from 15m to 30 m. The detailed study for Project highway has been carried out in Packages.These packages are described as under.

Construction of 4‐lane Road on NH‐12 (New NH‐52) from Km 299/000 to 346/540 (Darah‐Jhalawar‐Teendhar section) inthe state of Rajasthan under NHDP Phase-III on Hybrid Annuity Mode EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


DARAH @ km289+500 NH12

TEENDHAR @km 346+500NH12



Figure 0-2: Index Map of National Highway 12 in Rajasthan








EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Stretch-I; From Chainage 289+500 to 318+500 of NH-12 (Ahu River bridge, nearSuket Town). The stretch is passing through the Darah Wildlife. .

Stretch-II; From Chainage 318+500 to 346+540 of NH-12 (Teendhar). Thestretch is passing through Jhalawar Town and Jhalarapatan town.

Figure 0-3: Index Map of Project RoadThe Project Highway passes through Dabadev, SahrawadaSuket, Jhalarapatan&Jhalawar towns and various villages. The whole of the project is coming under theadministrative control of PIU Kota. The map of project road is given in Figure below.The details of the habitations are given in table 0-1.

Figure 0-4: The existing NH-12 Darah-Jhalawar-Teendhar Section of NH-12Table 0-2: Location of Built-Up Sections Along existing NH-12

S.No. Built-up area Chainage Population asper census 2011

1 Darah 288+500

DARAH @ km289+500 NH12

TEENDHAR @km 346+500NH12


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


2 Mukandara 290+500 17383 Amjhar 296+800 4064 Jalimpura 300+900 7325 Sahrawada 302+300 32206 Kheemuch 306+000 24387 Atraliya 308+900 4498 Suket 314+100 223199 Sahipur 317+800 281

10 Junapani 322+50011 Rayalati 327+900 51012 Jhalrapatan 332+300 3750613 Bhavrasa 342+100 96414 Rooparel 345+300 756

0.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF EXISTING PROJECT

The Existing road is 2-lane carriageway with/without earthen shoulder. Theexisting road is deficient horizontal and vertical alignment, degraded earthenor no shoulder in most stretches, inadequate and damaged cross drainagestructures and absence of side drains, safety installations, protection worksand road furniture. The photographs of existing road, and other componentsare given in Figures below. A salient feature of existing Project has beensummarized in Table below.

Table 0-3: Salient Features of Existing RoadParticulars DetailsTerrain Plain & rolling. Landuse is predominantly irrigated

Agricultural land and Forest landROW Average 20—30 m availableCarriageway Configuration 2-lane BT roadNumber of Junctions Major=3 and Minor =32Embankment height 0.5 to 1.0 m

Geometry Horizontal and vertical alignment of project corridorhas lot of deficiencies

Pavement Condition Mostly fair to poor, some stretches are damaged.Crust: Avg. 190 to 306 mm

Bridge/Culverts

Major Bridge = 3Minor Bridge = 3Box Culvert = 17Pipe Culverts=42Slab Culverts =2

Side Drains Not Exists in built-up stretchesRoad-Rail Structure RUB=2

Road Facility/SafetyFeature

There are no bus bays/ Truck lay-byes, serviceroad, underpass or any other road side furniture.Safety installations are limited to speed breakersand signages at very little location.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Figure 0-5: The photographs of existing road

Figure 0-6: Poor Geometric Conditions


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Figure 0-7: Pavement Condition of Project Road


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Figure 0-8: Photos of Bridges & Cross-Drainage


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


0.5 PRESENT TRAFFIC

A summary of the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) at two count stationsis presented in Table below for Seven days volume counts.

Table 0-4: Annual Average Daily Traffic

Location Vehicles PCUMT NMT Total MT NMT Total

At Ch.301BalajiBhojnaliyaBetween Darah-Suket

6191 0 6191 12956 0 12956

At K.M.StonPadmawatiHotel Between Suket-Teendhar

5398 0 5398 8772 0 8772

As per survey between Darah to Sukat at Ch.301 BalajiBhojnaliya, the predominant vehicles by number are cars (1903) followed by Muilt-Axles (1963)and LCVs (704).As per survey between Jhalawar to Aklera at K.M.StonPadmawati Hotel, thepre dominant vehicles by number are cars (1803) followed by Multi Axle (840)and LCVs (628).

Table 0-5: Traffic Compositions (By Number)

Sr.

No.

Type ofVehicle At Ch.301 BalajiBhojnaliya At K.M.StonPadmawati Hotel

between Jhalawar to Aklera

% weight No. Vehicles % weight No. Vehicles

1 Two wheeler 12% 689 25% 1301

2 Three wheeler 0% 23 1% 55

3 Car 32% 1903 35% 1805

4 Mini Bus 0% 8 0% 2

5 Bus 3% 176 4% 204

6 LCV 12% 704 12% 628

7 2 Axle 9% 503 4% 208

8 Multi Axle 32% 1863 16% 840

9 Tractor withTrailer

0% 27 2% 123

10 Two wheeler 0% 6 0% 6

Total 100 % 5209 100 % 5172


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


0.6 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS

0.6.1 ADOPTED MODE-WISE GROWTH RATES

The Consultant has made an assessment of the traffic demand for the ProjectHighway for a period of 10 years, 15 years, 20 years and 25 yearsrespectively based on analysis of traffic counts, trend growth and growth inthe influence area of the Project. An annual growth rate of 5% has beenassumed for fast moving traffic and slow moving vehicles both for the trafficprojections. At this stage no induced and diverted traffic has been considered.

0.6.2 PROJECTED TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUME ON HOMOGENEOUS SECTIONS

As per the base year (2015-16) data, classified traffic volume has beenprojected up to the horizon year (2040-41) for all the homogenous sections.The growth was estimated on an unconstrained capacity scenario in order toassess the maximum extent of traffic flow in the corridor under consideration.The summaries of total projected traffic volume for each of the homogeneoussection of the project corridor are given in Table below.

Table 0-6:Summary of Projected Total Traffic Volume

S.No. Year

Darah-Suket Suket-TeendharNo. Vehicles PCU”s No.

Vehicles PCU”s1 2015 6191 12956 5398 87722 2020 7902 16606 6933 112973 2025 10125 21297 8889 145074 2030 12962 27274 11378 185855 2035 16582 34899 14563 238096 2040 21201 44643 18627 304857 2045 27095 57059 23809 389898 2050 34622 72931 30427 49848

0.6.3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF THE HOMOGENEOUS SECTIONS

As per the clause 2.18" Capacity of Four land Highway" of the Manual ofSpecification and Standards IRC SP 84, 2014 the design service volume of 4-lane highway for different type of terrain is as given in table below:

Table 0-7:Design Service Volume of Four Lane HighwayNature of Terrain Desgin Service Volume in PCU's per day

Level of Service'8' Level of Service'C'Plain and Rolling 40,000 60,000Mountainous and

Steep20,000 30,000

As per the traffic projections it emerged that traffic in section-I Darah-Suketand section-II Suket-Teendhar will cross the 40000 PCU's in the year 2038-39and 2046-47 respectively. Average sectional traffic load crosses 40000 PCU'sin year 2041-42.

0.7 SELECTION OF PROJECT ALIGNMENT

The Existing road alignment passes through Mukandra Hills Tiger Reserve


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


and Darah wild life sanctuary from km 291 to km 298. The alignment passesthrough several town and villages areas of which some have built-upconglomerations in close proximity of the road. Some of important towns suchas Sarvada, Dabadeh, Suket, Jhalawar and Jhalarapatan towns shall requirethe bypasses due to the congestion.After the detailed studied of the project alignment options, site visits anddetailed discussion with forest and wildlife officials the project alignment hasbeen identified. Based on these the development of project road has beendivided into two packagesPackage-I: Darah ROB to Amjhar river bridge (From Chainage 289/500 Km.To 299/000 Km)Package-II: From Amjhar bridge to Teendhar (From Chainage 299/000 Km.

To 346/540 Km)

0.7.1 PACKAGE-I: DARAH ROB TO AMJHAR RIVER BRIDGE (FROM CHAINAGE289/500 KM. TO 299/000 KM)

The Existing road alignment passes through Darah wild life sanctuary from km291 to km 298. The sanctuary spreads on both side of existing road fromGagron fort (Kalisindh River) on LHS to Rawatbhata (Chamble River) on RHS.The railway track is also parallel to the existing road alignment & crosses theexiting road twice. As per the discussion with Forest and wild life officials, it isemerged that at grade widening is not possible along the existing road, itdivides the forest into the part and hinder the movement of animals. So, tominimize any disturbance to wild life due to increased traffic after upgradationof 2 Lane road to 4 Lane Road, it is proposed that road in the wild life areawill be elevated one.The proposed Alignment of this package starts from existing chainage289/500 of NH-12 and run of east side along existing NH -12 as new bypassand will again join at chainageof 291/00 of existing NH-12. The total length ofthis bypass is 2.5 Km. The bypass alignment is passing from Morukalanvillage.After this the proposed new alignment will run as elevated corridor on existingNH-12, from chainage 291/000uptochainage 296/200, then it moves awayfrom east side of existing road and cut the hill in some portion. Aftertraversing in the length of 1500 m as green field alignment, it again joins onexisting NH-12 at chainage 297/800. Then corridor runs on along existing NHuptoAmjhar River. The proposed elevated road is passing through fromMorukalan, Mukandara and Amjhar villages. The total length of elevated roadis about 6.5 Km. The approach of Amjhar River Bridge on south side hasbeen taken in this package and it ends at chainage 299/00.

0.7.2 PACKAGE-II: FROM AMJHAR BRIDGE TO TEENDHAR (FROM CHAINAGE299/000 KM. TO 346/540 KM)

The proposed Alignment of Four-Lane Project Highway starts from chainage299/000 of existing NH-12 and run on existing NH -12 upto existingchainage301/255. The alignment of Four-Lane Project Highway is passing fromKamalpura and KookaraKhurd villages. After that the proposed alignment of Four-Lane Project Highway leaves the existing NH and takes the combined bypass ofSaahrawada and Dabadeh of west side and it meets again on chainage 308/205on existing NH-12. The proposed bypass of is passing through KookaraKhurd,


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Manpura, Zalimpura, Sahrawada, TelyaKheri, Askali, HiriyaKheri and Kheemachvillages.

The combined bypass on west side of existing National Highway and avoidsreserved forest. Apart from this heavy traffic coming from Major town Modakwhich is situated on west side, will directly go to new alignment without enteringinto Dabadeh village. It will give relief to residents of Dabadeh village.

After this the alignment of proposed Four-Lane Project Highway runs on 875 mon existing NH uptochainage 309/079, then new alignment leave existing NH andmove west side to bypass the Atraliya Village and joins at existing NH atchainage 310/007, then run on existing NH uptochainage310.444, then againrealigned uptochainage 310.789.

After the chainage of 310/789 existing NH, the alignment of proposed Four-LaneProject Highway follows the NH-12 uptochainage 313/535. The alignment ispassing through Atraliya, Gordhanpura, Pamakheri, Deengsi villages. From thechainage 313/535 the alignment of proposed Four-Lane Project Highway takesthe bypass route on west side and it avoid the Suket, Jhalawar and Jhalarapatantowns and Joins again on NH-12 at chainage 342/895. The proposed bypass ispassing from Deengsi, Umedpura, Rampuriya, Suket, Beermandi, ArnyaKhurd,Surera, BansaHedi, Arnya Kalan, Gola, Kalamandi Kalan, Harishpura,KalmandiKhurd, Ralayti, Ralayta, Jhalrapatn, Madhopur, Haripura, Banjari andBhanwarsa. he proposed bypass alignment is avoiding of reserved forest in majorpart, however at the end of the proposed bypass approximately in the 1.5 kmlength of near village Banjari and Bhanwarsa is passing through reserved forest ofJhalawar District, which is unavoidable. .

Major town Ramganjmandi is situated on west side of proposed alignment, soheavy traffic will directly go to new alignment without entering into Suket TownThe proposed alignment is crossing Ahu River and two Railway lines.

After the bypass the new alignment run on existing NH from chainage 342/895 to346/540. It is passing from Bhanwarsa and Rooparel Village. The proposed Four-Lane Project Highway is crossing the Kalisindh River. The Proposed length of theproject highway is 48.880 km.

A meeting was held on 27/01/2017 at the CMO under chairmanship of Hon’blePublic Work Minister for finalization of alignment and obtain the consent of stategovernment. The proposed alignment was deliberated in the meeting. All theofficials of the state government were agreed with proposed alignment.

After selection of alignment options in the forest and bypasses it can beconcluded that the existing alignment and proposed alignment of NH-12 in Darah–Teendhar section has quite different. The proposed alignment is only smallportion of existing alignment is following. Looking this all engineering surveys andinvestigation are being done along the proposedalignment.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Figure 0-9: Map of Approved Alignment

0.8 COMPARISION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED ALIGNMENT OF PACKAGE-II

The Comparison of Existing and Proposed alignment of Package-II are given inthe following table

Table 0-8:Comparison of Existing and Proposed alignment of Package-II

SR.NO.

ExistingChainage (Km)

DesignChainage (Km)

Design

Length(Km)

ExistingRight of Way

(ROW) in(m)

Name ofRevenue Village

To From To From1 299.000 299.340 9.860 10.200 0.340 10 KAMALPURA2 299.340 299.740 10.200 10.600 0.400 9 KAMALPURA3 299.740 300.140 10.600 11.000 0.400 14 KAMALPURA4 300.140 300.440 11.000 11.300 0.300 13 KAMALPURA5 300.440 300.778 11.300 11.638 0.338 12 KOOKARA KHURD6 300.778 301.255 11.638 12.115 0.477 12 MANPURA7 Dabadeh&Sahrawad 12.115 12.300 0.185 Dabadeh&Sahr MANPURA


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


8 a Bypass 12.300 13.028 0.728 awada Bypass ZALIMPURA9 13.028 14.200 1.172 SAHRAWADA10 14.200 15.661 1.461 TELYA KHERI11 15.661 17.242 1.581 ASKALI12 17.242 19.273 2.031 HIRIYA KHERI13 19.273 19.788 0.515 KHEEMACH14 308.203 308.515 19.788 20.100 0.312 15 KHEEMACH15 308.515 308.715 20.100 20.300 0.200 19 KHEEMACH16 308.715 308.915 20.300 20.500 0.200 7 ATRALIYA17 308.915 309.079 20.500 20.664 0.164 7 ATRALIYA

18 Atraliya Realignment 20.664 21.682 1.018 AtraliyaRealignment ATRALIYA

19 310.007 310.125 21.682 21.800 0.118 10 ATRALIYA20 310.125 310.325 21.800 22.000 0.200 11 ATRALIYA21 310.325 310.444 22.000 22.119 0.119 11 GORDHANPURA

22 Atraliya Realignment 22.119

22.464 0.345 Atraliya

RealignmentGORDHANPURA &

PAMA KHERI23 310.789 311.125 22.464 22.800 0.336 16 PAMA KHERI24 311.125 311.494 22.800 23.169 0.369 13 PAMA KHERI25 311.494 311.625 23.169 23.300 0.131 12 PAMA KHERI26 311.625 311.776 23.300 23.451 0.151 13 PAMA KHERI27 311.776 312.025 23.451 23.700 0.249 17 PAMA KHERI28 312.025 312.725 23.700 24.400 0.700 14 DEENGASI29 312.725 312.925 24.400 24.600 0.200 14 DEENGASI30 312.925 313.025 24.600 24.700 0.100 15 DEENGASI31 313.025 313.125 24.700 24.800 0.100 15 DEENGASI32 313.125 313.370 24.800 25.045 0.245 12 DEENGASI33 313.370 313.535 25.045 25.210 0.165 15 DEENGASI34

Suket,Jhalawar&Jhalrapatan

Bypass

25.210 25.254 0.044

Suket,Jhalawar&Jhalrapatan Bypass

DEENGASI35 25.254 26.124 0.870 UMMEDPURA36 26.124 27.000 0.876 RAMPURIYA37 27.000 27.358 0.358 SUKET38 27.358 27.854 0.496 BEER MANDI39 27.854 28.000 0.146 SUKET40 28.000 29.571 1.571 ARANYA KHURD41 29.571 31.212 1.641 SURERA42 31.212 33.617 2.405 BANSYA HERI43 33.617 35.565 1.948 ARANYA KALAN44 35.565 36.100 0.535 GOLA

45 36.100 38.000 1.900 KALMANDIKALAN

46 38.000 38.537 0.537 HARISH PURA

47 38.537 40.343 1.806 KALMANDIKHURD

48 40.343 41.784 1.441 RALAYTI49 41.784 44.224 2.440 RALAYTA50 44.224 49.800 5.576 JHALRAPATAN51 49.800 51.434 1.634 MADHOPUR52 51.434 52.516 1.082 HARIPURA

53 52.516 54.200 1.684HARIPURA,

BANJARI &BHANWARSA

54 54.200 54.565 0.365 BHANWARSA55 342.895 343.673 54.565 55.343 0.778 12 BHANWARSA

56 343.673 347.127 55.343 58.740 3.397 37 BHANWARSA &ROOPAREL

48.880

0.9 ENGINEERING SURVEYS &INVESTIGATIONS FOR PACKAGE-II

0.9.1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS

Topographic surveys were carried out from in the month of November andDecember 2016 and January2017. Survey has been carried out using DGPS& Total Station.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


0.9.2 SUB GRADE INVESTIGATIONS

Sub-grade investigations are conducted by making the test pits along theproject highway. The subgrade investigations are carried out from thecollected the samples. The analysis of existing sub-grade material shows, theCBR values are in the range of 7-9% and the borrow soil also has CBR of 8-10%.

0.10 DESIGN PARAMETERS

The Project road improvement will broadly follow special codal provisionsrelevant to National highways prescribed by Indian Road Congress (IRC: SP:84-2014) and Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) Guidelines.In case of any compromise with these guidelines, has been specificallymentioned with reasons. All efforts have been made to maintain theconsistency of design criteria for all sub-projects barring few exceptionalcases due to limiting factors for the reason that of ground conditions. Designcriteria adopted for the project is summarized in Table below.

Table 0-9: Design ParametersS. No Parameters Detail

1 Geometric designstandards

IRC codes, guidelines and special publications.IRC:84-2014 “Four-laning of highways throughPublic Private Partnership” Manual of specificationsand standards published by Planning Commissionand orders issued as per NHAI

2 Design Speed (Km/hr) Ruling -100 Km/Hr

3 Roadway Elements

Carriageway: 2 x 7.0 mPaved shoulder- 2 x 1.5 mEarthen shoulder-2 x 2.0 mMedian -5.0 M including 0.5 m Shyness strip bothsides

4 Service Road Width Not providedSlip Road Width 5.5 M and 7.0 M

5 Embankment Slope In filling- 1V: 2 HIn cutting- 1V:1H

6 Ditch Slopes (H:V) 1:1 (Fore slope or back slope)

7 Camber Carriageway/Paved Shoulder- 2.0 %,Unpaved/Hard Shoulder-3.0.%

8 Super-elevation Maximum 7%

9 Min Radii for HorizontalCurves

400 m for speed of 100 km/hr,

10 Gradient Maximum 2.5 %/

11 Design FloodFrequency

Bridges: 50 years, with anticipated risk of rarer floodof next higher frequency i.e. 100 year return periodflood on the structure

12 Free board 0.6 m to 1.5 m depending on discharge

0.11 IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALS FOR PACKAGE-II

In order to meet future traffic requirement the existing carriageway isproposed for up gradation to 4-lane divided carriageway with paved shoulders


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


to achieve high speed of travel with comfort and safety. The forest and heavybuilt-up area along the existing road. Two-lane to Four-lane widening shallrequire the large amount of forest and no. of the commercial and otherstructures. As per the alignment approval it is cleared that about 38.391 km.alignment length is passing through the green field site.Wherever the existing road has been used,concentric widening is adopted torestrict land acquisition to minimum. The existing geometry has few curvesrequiring geometric improvement. The deficient sections have been improvedto designstandards. The proposed Project Highway shall be of Four-lanedivided carriageway with paved shoulder & earthen shoulder and six lanestructures and their 6-lane carriageway approaches.

The Full length of Project Highway is proposed with new rigid pavement formain carriageway including reconstruction of existing Two-lane road. Facilitiesin the form of underpasses and grade separator are considered at reasonableinterval for local traffic including pedestrian movement.

0.11.1 PROPOSED CROSS SECTIONS

The Summary of the proposed Typical Cross Section along the Project Highway aregiven in the following table.

Table 0-10: Summary of Proposed Cross Sections

Sr.No.

StartChainagei

Km.

EndChainage in

Km.

DesignLength in

KmProposed C/S Type

Reference asIRC SP 84

1 9.860 11.600 1.740 TCS-I-A and TCS-I-B TCS A-3 Figure2.4

2 11.600 11.790 0.190 TCS-II-D Transition

3 11.790 12.355 0.565 TCS-II &TCS-II-B (VUP) Figure 7.8


5 12.545 15.235 2.690 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4




9 16.255 16.820 0.565 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4


11 17.010 17.605 0.595 TCS-II &TCS-II-A (LVUP) Figure 7.8


13 17.795 19.470 1.675 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4




17 20.720 21.750 1.030 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4

18 21.750 22.100 0.350 TCS-I-A TCS A-3 Figure 2.4

19 22.100 22.520 0.420 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4



22 23.320 24.320 1.000 TCS-II-C Developed As Per


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Sr.No.

StartChainagei

Km.

EndChainage in

Km.

DesignLength in

KmProposed C/S Type


Site

23 24.320 25.480 1.160 TCS-II &TCS-II-A &TCS-II-B LVUP & VUP

Figure 7.8

24 25.480 25.670 0.190 TCS-II(D) Transition

25 25.670 26.390 0.720 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4


27 26.580 27.355 0.775 TCS-II &TCS-II-B LVUP Figure 7.8


29 27.545 28.400 0.855 Toll Plaza

30 28.400 29.490 1.090 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4




34 30.615 33.535 2.920 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4

35 33.535 33.635 0.100 TCS-VI and TCS VI-A Figure 7.8(RUB)

36 33.635 35.845 2.210 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4

37 35.845 36.300 0.455 TCS IV ( Ahu River MajorBridge

Figure 7.3

38 36.300 36.640 0.340 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4




42 37.465 40.580 3.115 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4



45 41.580 41.935 0.355 TCS--II-C Developed As PerSite



48 42.700 43.645 0.945 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4

49 43.645 44.106 0.461 TCS-III-C Figure 7.8

50 44.106 44.131 0.025 TCS-III-A Figure 7.8

51 44.131 44.169 0.038 TCS-III-B Railway Span As Per RDSO

52 44.169 44.194 0.025 TCS-III-A Figure 7.8

53 44.194 44.855 0.661 TCS-III-C Figure 7.8

54 44.855 45.335 0.480 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4




58 46.220 46.540 0.320 TCS-V-C Developed As PerSite

59 46.540 46.900 0.360 TCS-V-B Figure 7.8

60 46.900 47.000 0.100 TCS-V-A Figure 7.8

61 47.000 47.650 0.650 TCS-V-B Figure 7.8


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Sr.No.

StartChainagei

Km.

EndChainage in

Km.

DesignLength in

KmProposed C/S Type


62 47.650 48.150 0.500 TCS-V-A Figure 7.8

63 48.150 48.340 0.190 TCS-V-B Figure 7.8

64 48.340 49.020 0.680 TCS-V-C Developed As PerSite



67 50.520 52.710 2.190 TCS-I TCS A-3 Figure 2.4

68 52.710 53.210 0.500 TCS-I-D TCS A-3 Figure 2.4

69 53.210 53.470 0.260 TCS-I-E TCS A-3 Figure 2.4

70 53.470 54.000 0.530 TCS-I-D TCS A-3 Figure 2.4




74 55.200 56.300 1.100 TCS-I-A TCS A-3 Figure 2.4

75 56.300 56.880 0.580 TCS-I-C TCS A-3 Figure 2.4

76 56.880 57.310 0.430 Type-IV-A Figure 7.4A

77 57.310 57.565 0.255 TCS-I-C TCS A-3 Figure 2.4



80 58.560 58.740 0.180 TCS-VII Developed As PerSite

48.880

All the above schemes are general policy decisions; these will be dependenton the precise geometric configuration, realignment, re-sectioning,reconstruction, exact land widths available etc. Details of the proposed crosssections are as follows.

Table 0-11: Summary of Proposed Cross-sections

Sr.No. TCS Description1 TCS-I New 4 lane divided carriageway with paved

and earthen shoulders with raised median

2 TCS-I-ANew 4 lane divided carriageway withpaved and earthen shoulders with LHSside widening with raised median

3 TCS-I-BNew 4 lane divided carriageway withpaved and earthen shoulders with RHSside widening with raised median

4 TCS-I-CNew 4 lane divided carriageway withpaved and earthen shoulders and variablewidth of median

5 TCS-I-D

New 4 lane divided carriageway withpaved and earthen shoulders with raisedmedian in high embankment section inforest area within 45 m ROW

6 TCS-I-ENew 4 lane divided carriageway withpaved and earthen shoulders with raisedmedian in hill cutting sec section in forest


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Sr.No. TCS Descriptionarea within 45 m ROW

7 TCS-II 6-lane approach road (RE Wall) for VUPand LVUP with slip road on both sides

8 TCS-II-A 6-lane LVUP9 TCS-II-B 6-Lane VUP

10 TCS-II-C 6-lane carriageway with Slip Road on bothsides

11 TCS-II-DTransition Section between 4-lane road to6-lane road with provision of slip road onboth sides

12 TCS-III-C 6-lane carriageway for ROB approaches insolid fill

13 TCS-III-A 2x3-lane Viaduct on ROB

14 TCS-III-B 2X3-Lane Viaduct in railway boundary withfootpaths

15 TCS-IV 2x3-lane new bridge on river on Ahu

16 TCS-IV-A 3-lane new bridge with existing 2-lanebridge on Kalisindh River

17 TCS-V-A 2X3-lane viaduct structures on MelaGround and Chandrabagha River

18 TCS-V-B 6-lane flyover approaches19 TCS-V-C 6-lane carriageway20 TCS-VI 6-lane carriage way approach for RUB

21 TCS-VI-A RUB section 2x13.5 m x5.5m boxes in 50m length

22 TCS-VII Transition Section from 4-lane to 2-lanewith paved shoulders



Figure 0-10: Proposed Cross Section Details





















Construction of 4‐lane Road on NH‐12 (New NH‐52) from Km 299/000 to 346/540(Darah‐Jhalawar‐Teendhar section) in the state of Rajasthan under NHDP Phase-III onHybrid Annuity Mode

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Thoughts Consultants Jaipur Pvt. Ltd. Page 28

0.11.2 FLYOVERS /VEHICULAR UNDERPASSES/ OVERPASSES

The proposed alignment is crossing the various State Highways, Major District Road, andother mining roads. Apart from these the project is also crossing the Mala Ground inJhalarapatan. The Flyovers / Vehicular Underpasses need to be provided all State Highwayand Major District Roads. As per the discussion and directions of NHAI officials all Majorstructures are proposed with 6-lane configurations. The proposed location of the VUP/LVUPand Flyover are given in the following table.

Table 0-12: The proposed location of the VUP/LVUP FlyoverinPackage-II

S.No.Design Span/

VerticalClearance (m) RemarksChainage

(Km)Opening

(m)

1 12+125 24 5.5 VUP of 6-Lane

2 15+725 24 5.5 VUP of 6-Lane

3 17+353 10.5 4.5 LVUP of 6-Lane

4 19+965 24 5.5 VUP of 6-Lane

5 23+065 10.5 4.5 LVUP of 6-Lane

6 24+547 10.5 4.5 LVUP of 6-Lane

7 25+100 24 5.5 VUP of 6-Lane

8 27+025 24 5.5 VUP of 6-Lane

9 30+075 24 5.5 VUP of 6-Lane

10 37+050 10.5 4.5 LVUP of 6-Lane

11 41+095 24 5.5 VUP of 6-Lane

12 42+258 10.5 4.5 LVUP of 6-Lane

13 43+825 10.5 4.5 LVUP of 6-Lane

14 45+875 10.5 4.5 LVUP of 6-Lane

15 49+330 24 5.5 VUP of 6-Lane

16 50+095 3x24 5.5 VUP of 6-Lane

17 54+500 24 5.5 VUP of 6-Lane

18 58+125 3x24 5.5 VUP of 6-Lane

19 46+900 to47+000 4x25 5.5 Viaduct of 2X3-lane

20 47+650 to48+00 14x25 4.5 Viaduct of 6-lane in

Mela Ground

Note: 1) All VUP and LVUP are 6-lane Carriageway with Slip roads, except *LVUP @ km.43.825:Approaches of ROB (No Slip road)

23) LVUP @ km.45.875: On the re-alignment

0.11.3 PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASSES

The Pedestrian underpasses are provided at the following locations.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Table 0-13: The proposed location of the PUPin Package-II

S.No.Design Span/ Vertical

Clearance(m)

RemarksChainage(Km)

Opening(m)

1 12.450 7.00 3.00 PUP of 4-lane2 21.180 7.00 3.00 PUP of 4-lane3 23.695 7.00 3.00 PUP of 6-lane4 31.200 7.00 3.00 PUP of 4-lane5 37.900 7.00 3.00 PUP of 4-lane6 38.545 7.00 3.00 PUP of 4-lane7 39.525 7.00 3.00 PUP of 4-lane8 41.465 7.00 3.00 PUP of 6-lane9 51.762 7.00 3.00 PUP of 4-lane10 53.650 7.00 3.00 PUP of 4-lane

Note: 1) All PUP are of 4-lane configuration except PUP at km.23.695 & km.41.465 are of 6-laneconfiguration with Slip roads

0.11.4 SERVICE ROAD/ SLIP ROAD

The Service Road / Slip Roads are proposed mainly along the VUP’S and LVUP’s. Thelocation of the slip roads and connecting roads are given in following table.

Table 0-14: Details of locations of the proposed slip Road

Sr.No.

Location of Slip road (fromDesign km to km) Length (m) of

service roadRight hand side (RHS)/Left hand

side (LHS)/ or Both sidesWidth(m)Start Chainage End Chainage

1 11+790 12+355 0.565 Both Side 5.52 15+425 16+065 0.64 Both Side 5.53 17+010 17+605 0.595 Both Side 5.54 19+660 20+530 0.87 Both Side 5.55 22+710 25+480 2.77 Both Side 5.56 26+580 27+355 0.775 Both Side 5.57 29+680 30+425 0.745 Both Side 5.58 36+830 37+275 0.445 Both Side 5.59 40+770 42+510 1.74 Both Side 5.510 45+525 46+125 0.6 Both Side 5.511 49+020 50+330 1.31 Both Side 7.012 54+190 55+010 0.82 Both Side 5.513 57+755 58+560 0.805 Both Side 7.0

Note: 1) Total slip road length = 25.360 km on both sides.

2) Slip road length excluding merging & diverging length.3) At VUP/LVUP/Flyover & PUP location existing road has been tie-in with slip road.4) Any Junction with Slip road and cross-road need to be properly developed and carryout up- gradation ofcross road.

Table 0-15: Details of Connecting RoadSr.No. Location of connecting roads (from km to km) Right hand side (RHS)/Left hand

side (LHS)Length(km)

1 Construction of parallel to approach of VUP of ProjectHighway @19+965 LHS 0.2*

2 Chainage 43+600 to 43+830 LHS 0.33**3 Chainage 45+875 RHS 0.2***


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Note: The width of the connecting road is 7+2x1.5 mtr.

*Existing NH realignment for joining VUP of Project Highway @19+965

** Realignment of Existing Local Road to cross the Project Highway at 43+830

*** Cross Link of LVUP at 45+ 875 with Parallel Road

0.11.5 CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES

All the proposed Major, Minor bridges and Culverts are new. The Summary of the proposedMajor, Minor bridges and Culverts are given in the following tables

Table 0-16: Details of Proposed Major Bridges

SI.No.Design

ChainageofBridge at (Km)

SpanArrangementNo of Span xSpan (m)

Width of carriageway andcross-sectional features

1 36.105 13x25.0 2x3-lane carriageway2 48.025 6x25.0 2x3-lane carriageway3 57.100 13x31.6 1x3-lane carriageway

Note:Major Bridge @km.48.025 (From Km. 48.000 to Km. 48.150) is a part of 2x3-lane Flyover

Table 0-17: Details of Proposed Minor Bridges

SI.No.Design Chainageof Minor Bridge (

Km)

No. of box x Size of Box (m xm)

1 12+400 3x8x52 16+050 5x8x53 17+880 3x(8x5)4 17+950 3x8x55 33+200 1x8x56 34+350 1x8x57 44+900 1x8x58 49+775 5x8x59 53+900 1x8x5

Note: All minor Bridge shall be constructed as box Culverts

Table 0-18: Details of new Box Culverts under Project Scope

SI.No.Design Chainage

of CulvertLocation( Km)

No. x Size of Box (mxm)

1 11+605 1x4.0x3.0

2 13+400 1x2x23 13+980 1x2x24 14+980 1x3x25 16+600 1x4x36 22+450 1x4x37 24+610 1x6x38 25+800 1x6x3


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


SI.No.Design Chainage

of CulvertLocation( Km)

No. x Size of Box (mxm)

9 29+000 1x6x410 29+900 1x3x211 32+050 1x6x412 32+300 1x6x413 35+250 1x5x414 36+750 1x6x415 37+550 1x4x316 38+100 1x6x317 39+180 1x6x318 55+820 1x6x4

Table 0-19: Details of New Pipe Culverts under Project Scope

SI.No. Design Chainage ofCulvert Location ( Km) No. XDia. Of pipe (m)

1 9.925 2x1.22 10.425 2x1.23 10.595 3x1.24 10.825 1x1.25 11.030 1x1.26 23.670 1x1.27 55.120 1x1.28 21.700 2x1.29 22.850 3x1.210 45.800 2x1.211 48.220 3x1.212 48.345 2x1.213 48.645 2x1.214 48.875 1X1.215 51.750 4x1.2

0.11.6 RAIL OVER BRIDGE (ROB)/ RAIL UNDER BRIDGE

Road over-bridges (road over rail) shall be provided at the following level crossings,

SI.No.Location of Level

crossing(chainage km)

DesignChainageViaduct (

Km)

SpanArrangement Length of bridge (m)

1 44.150 44.150 1x25x37.28+1x25.0

1210 (Including theapproaches and the viaducts)

Road under-bridges (road under railway line) shall be provided at the following levelcrossings,

SI.No. Location of Level crossing(chainage km)

Number andLength of span (m)

Remarks

1 33.585 2x25.0 2x3-lane ( 13.5mx5.5 m) Size Box

0.11.7 FLYOVER

A flyover has been proposed at the Melaground.

SI.No.

DesignChainage ofstructure (

Km.)

Length (m)

Number and lengthof spans (m)

ApproachGradient

Remarks , ifany


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


1 46.220 to49.020 2800

320 at Grade+360 msolid approach 4x25Viaducts +650 solidapproach+20x25Viaduct+190 solidapproach+680 at grade

2.50% 6-Lane

Note:Includes solid portion of 1200 mtrand approaches of 1000 mtr.

0.11.8 PAVMENT DESIGN

Rigid pavement has been proposed for main carriageway. Flexible pavement is proposed for Sliproads. The rigid pavement design for has been carried out following the guidelines of IRC 58-2015. The following input parameters have been used in designing the rigid pavements:

Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete : 30000 Poisson’s Ratio: 0.15 Coefficient of thermal Ex0pansion of Concrete 10X10-6 Tyre Pressure 8 Kg/Cm2 Subgrade CBR 8% Design Life (yrs.) 30

Pavement composition proposed in different sections is given in following Table.

Table 0-20: Proposed Pavement Composition for Main Carriage wayParticular Thickness in mm

Thickness of Pavement Quality Concrete (PQC) of M40grade (mm) 300Thickness of Dry Lean Concrete (DLC) of M15 grade (mm) 150Drainage Layer 150GSB as Separation Layer 200Sub grade with min CBR 8 500

The pavement design proposed is flexible pavement for the slip road has been designedfor 10 MSA traffic with Bitumen grade of VG 40 and effective design CBR of 9%.

Table 0-21: Proposed Pavement Composition for Slip Roads & Cross RoadParticular Thickness in mm for Slip

RoadThickness in mm for

Cross RoadBC, 40 40DBM 50 50WMM 250 250GSB 200 150

0.11.9 INTERSECTIONS AND GRADE SEPARATORS

Junctions has been provided where major roads, cross or join the project road. There is no at-grade intersection with a major road. However, Cross roads at the location of Flyover, VUP,LVUP Underpass to be improved and constructed as per manual.

0.11.10 DRAINAGE

Effective drainage systems are provided for entire project highway including structuresand facilities to avoid water logging. The water from road and adjacent areas has beenintercepted and carried through road side drains to natural outfalls. Only (rectangular


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


covered, open lined rectangular drain have been proposed along the project road at someof built-up sections.

0.11.11 PROTECTIONS WORKS

The side slopes have provided using suitable slope protection measures; drainage Chutesusing NP-2 300mm dia RCC semicircular pipes; energy dissipation basin at toe of chutes;wherever required along the Project Highway confirming to IRC guidelines and standardspecifications have been provided.

0.11.12 RETAINING WALL/ BREAST WALL

Retaining wall / breast wall have been provided as per site requirements and Crosssections given to accommodate in the proposed ROW. The Retaining wall have beenprovided at all the approaches to grade separators, underpasses, interchanges, ROBs andhigh embankment where the height of embankment is more than 6.0m.

0.11.13 PROJECT FACILITIES

The following Project facilities have been included in the Project.

Toll Plazas

At 28.000 Km. the 16-lane has been proposed with ETC, WIM, SWM and toilet block.

Roadside Furniture

Traffic Signs and Pavement Markings: The project road have been provided with allsafety features such as elaborate system of signs and markings, cat’s eyes, delineators,object markers, hazard markers, safety barriers at hazardous locations, pedestrianguardrails, etc. Guidelines given in IRC: 8, IRC: 25, IRC:26, IRC:35, IRC:67, IRC:103and Section 800 of MoRTH Specifications have been used for providing these items.

Boundary fencing

Boundary Stones

Hectometre / Kilometre Stones

LED Traffic Beacons:

Street Lighting

The Lighting has been provided as per the 12.3 of the IRC: SP 84-2014, Four LaneManual guidelines,

High mast lighting Street lighting: Toll Plaza, Rest Area, Truck Lay-bye, Bus Bay and Bus shelter Locations,

Grade separated Structures, Interchanges, Flyovers, Underpasses (vehicular (VUPand LVUP)/ pedestrian) and Overpasses, all the Slip roads etc.

Pedestrian Facilities

Pedestrian guardrail: Provide pedestrian guardrail at each bus bay locations,Truck Lay byes, near School/Hospital and at major junctions.

Pedestrian walkway: Provide pedestrian walkway as in all urban areas alongfootpath.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Pedestrian Crossings: Provide pedestrian crossing facilities atJunctions/VUP/Flyover.

Truck Lay-Byes

Truck lay byes shall be provided at the following locations for a capacity of 5 bays,S.No. Design Chainage (Km) Side Village

1 Km. 18+100 Both Hiriya-Kheri

Bus-bays and Passenger Shelters

Locations of Bus Shelters are provided infollowing Table.

S.No. DesignChainage (Km) Side Location Name

1 13.400 Both Sides Sahrawada2 21.900 Both Sides Atraliya3 27.500 Both Sides Beer Mandi4 37.350 Both Sides Kalmandi Kalan5 48.250 Both Sides Jhalrapatan

Others

These may include Traffic Aid Posts, Medical Aid Posts, Vehicle Rescue Posts, HighwayPatrol Unit, Ambulances, Cranes, Advance Traffic Management System (ATMS), TelecomSystem, Operation and Maintenance Centre, Landscaping and tree plantation, Rainwaterharvesting system and utilities ducts

0.12 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL

Due to favorable topography (rolling/undulating), earth mater ial for the project is available inabundant close to the project road. Soil samples of identified borrows areas mostlyconforms to MoRTH specifications and will be operated and rehabilitated as per IRC: 10-1961. Stone aggregates will be sourced from existing licensed quarries. However,contractor may use any source subject to compliance of statutory/legal requirements. Sandis also available in plenty in nearby the project road. Water requirement for construction willbe met through surface water sources as far as possible.Fly ash utilisation is mandated by notifications under Environment Protection Act, 1986.Ministry of Environment & Forest, Govt. of India have brought out Fly Ash Notifications S.O.763(E) dated 14 Sept 1999, its amendment notification on S.O 979(E) dated 27 Aug 2003and notification S.O 2804(E) dated 3 Nov 2009.Clause 5 of the said Notification stipulatesuse of fly ash in road making. The project is located within 100 km distance fromoperational thermal power plants such Kota thermal and Kalisindh thermal power plant andhence fly-ash utilization is mandatory. Some has been considered.

0.13 ENVIRONMENTAL FOREST & WILDLIFE ISSUES

As per MoEF&CC notification dated 22 August 2013, " Projects to expand nationalhighways by up to 100 kilometers, which involve additional right of way or land acquisitionup to 40 meters on existing alignments and 60 meters on re-alignments or by-passes, willno longer come under the purview of the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification ,2006". Thus the project road does not require Environmental Clearance because theproposed National highway-12 in Darah-Jhalawar-Teendhar section package-II havinglength of 48.880 Km.The Project road is located within the 10 Km. buffer Zone of Mukandra Tiger Reserve Hill,Mukandra National park andDarah wildlife sanctuary,all these are protected area. Thus theapproval of National wildlife Board shall be required.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Approximately 7.336 Ha forest land is required under the project. The forest land needs tobe diverted under the Forest Conservation act, 1980. However, no loss ofrare/threatened/endangered species of flora is envisaged. All impacts are site-specific andcan be addressed through proven mitigation measures. Hence, the project is warranting aninitial environmental examination (IEE). The EIA & EMP report has been prepared as perMOEF & CC Guidelines

0.14 LAND ACQUISITION & RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN

The existing road has 20-30 m ROW. The 60 m ROW has been proposed for realignmentand bye passes. Total 260 Ha of land shall be acquired..

0.15 PROJECT COST ESTIMATES

0.15.1 RATE ANALAYSIS

The basic rates for labour, material and cartage have been taken from the SOR of KotaCircle NH latest Schedule of 2016-17. For labour minimum wages has been taken fromnotification of Labour Commissioner GoR. The leads/haulage of different constructionmaterial has been worked out based on material investigation for location of borrow area,quarry of Stone Aggregates, Sand etc.The basic rate of Bitumen and Steel has been taken from websites. The basic rate ofcement has been taken from “NAMPro”MORTH website as per the MOU with cementcompanies. On the basic rate of bitumen taken from the Mathura Refinery and an exciseduty @ 14.42% has been added and CST/VAT and Cartage cost is further added to arriveat the current rate of Bitumen. The lead and other charges have been added.In Granular Sub Base, Mix in place Method is used while analyzing and putting the rate ofCost Estimation. The format for working out rate for different items of bill of quantities havebeen taken from The Standard Data Book of MORT&H.

0.15.2 QUANTITIES

As per the detailed design the quantities of various items has been worked out for variouscomponents. After that the various same type of the items have been added to a rrive theparticular bill as per NHAI guidelines.

0.15.3 COST ESTIMATES

The civil cost estimates has been worked out as per the various circular issued byNHAI.The total civil cost of Package-II has been worked out Rs. 853Cr.Total project costhas been worked out Rs.1217 Cr. The summary of civil cost and total project cost forpackage-II is given in following table.

Table 0-22: Summary of Cost Estimates

PARTICULAR Amount (INR) Amount in Cr

BILL NO: 1 Site ClearanceAndDismantling 13587360 1.36BILL NO: 2 - Earthwork 906315680 90.63BILL NO: 3 - Sub-Base and Base Courses 322917295 32.29BILL NO: 4 (A) - Bituminous Works - Flexible Pavement 94645258 9.46


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


PARTICULAR Amount (INR) Amount in Cr

BILL NO: 4 (B) - Rigid Pavement 2128523212 212.85BILL NO: 5 CulvertsBoxCulverts 38590844 3.86Pipe Culverts 17375099 1.74BILL NO:6 BridgesMinorBridges 243187749 24.32MajorBridges 502852278 50.29PUP 98569416 9.86VUP 729153302 72.92LVUP 182864231 18.29Elevated Portion 538210114 53.82ROB 197015649 19.70RUB 114366838 11.44Repair andRehabilitationof Existing Bridges 615770 0.06BILL NO: 7 Drainage& Protection Work 1799700469 179.97BILL NO: 8 Junction 8513216 0.85BILL NO: 9 - Traffic Signs, RoadMarkingsandAppurtenances 172868867 17.29

Bill NO:10 Miscellaneous 397722185 39.77BILL NO: 11 - Maintenance 6765694 0.68

TOTAL CIVIL COST 8514360526 851.44CENTENGES @ 15 % 1277154079

TOTAL PROJECT COST 9791514605 979.15COST PER KM IN CRORES (ON CIVIL COST) 17.45COST PER KM IN CRORES (ON TPC ) 20.06

UTILITY SHIFTING 300000000 30.00LAND ACQUISITION, R & R & FOREST DIVERSIONCOST

2050000000 205.00

ENVIRONMENTAL COST @ 0.30% 25543082 2.55TOTAL PROJECT COST 12167057686 1216.71

The Civil cost per km. of this package is more than as compare to the cost norm of theNHAI and MORTH. The reasons may be following

More than 75 % length of the proposed project alignment is green field. The project is passing through the Water logged area. The project include the 11 VUP, 7 LVUP, 3 High level River bridge, One ROB,

one RUB, and elevated road in the Mela ground.

0.16 IMPLEMENTATION OPTIONS

It can be concluded that the project may be taken up on Hybrid Annuitymode.

Documents

(GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & …forestsclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Addinfo/0_0_51111121112171... · Thoughts Consultants Jaipur Pvt. Ltd. National Highways