Google The Handle System ⓡ Dublin Core OAI-PMH OpenURL arXiv Dspace LOCKSS

Napoli, 21 febbraio 2006

"Saperi storici e nuove tecnologie" - Giovanni Bruno

1

• Google• The Handle Systemⓡ

• Dublin Core• OAI-PMH• OpenURL• arXiv• Dspace• LOCKSS

• Carl Lagoze, Dean B. Krafft, Sandy Payette, Susan Jesuroga, What Is a Digital Library Anymore, Anyway?. Beyond Search and Access in the NSDL, D-Lib Magazine November 2005, Volume 11 Number 11



2

The Handle System is a general-purpose global name service that allows secured name resolution and administration over networks such as the Internet. The Handle System manages handles, which are unique names for digital objects and other Internet resources.



3

The Digital Object Identifier System • Unique identifiers are essential for the management of

information in any digital environment.• Identifiers assigned in one context may be encountered,

and may be re-used, in another place (or time) without consulting the assigner.

• The necessity of allowing interoperability adds the requirement of persistence to an identifier: it implies interoperability with the future.

• The DOI system provides a ready-to-use packaged system of several components: – a specified standard numbering syntax; – a resolution service (based on the existing Handle System); – a data model incorporating a data dictionary (based on the

indecs Data Dictionary); and – an implementation mechanism through policies and

procedures for the governance and application of DOIs.



4

• arXiv• Started in Aug 1991, arXiv.org (formerly

xxx.lanl.gov) is a fully automated electronic archive and distribution server for research papers.

• Users can retrieve papers from the archive either through an world wide web interface, or by sending commands to the system via e-mail. Authors can submit their papers to the archive using the world wide web interface. Authors may update their submissions if they choose, though previous versions remain available.



5

MIT – HP: DSpace™ a repository for the digital research and educational material produced by members of a research university or organizationDSpace is designed to make participation by depositors easy



6

Stanford University Library-Sun Microsystem Laboratories

LOCKSS (Lots Of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) is a tool designed for libraries to use to ensure their community's continued access to web-published scientific journals. LOCKSS allows libraries to take custody of the material to which theysubscribe, in the same way they do for paper, and to preserve it.

LOCKSS' key goal is to preserve a reader's access to content published on the web.



7

• Google and OAI-PMH Down Under. Google is using OAI-PMH to harvest information from the National Library of Australia (NLA) Digital Object Repository. http://www.nla.gov.au/digicoll/oai/ (03/05)

Open Archive Initiative –Protocol for Metadata Harvesting 2.0

• item• record

• identificativo• metadata

• richieste• codifica XML



8

OAI-PMH: Data Provider – Service Provider



9

scenari

• evoluzione tecnologica e diffusione della rete– Internet non è più solo un grande

contenitore di informazioni– diventa un condiviso ambiente di lavoro– armonizzazione delle tecnologie– condivisione delle informazioni

• si afferma un modello decentrato– garantire le differenze e le esigenze

specifiche– ridurre le immobilizzazioni materiali– esternalizzare i servizi (soluzioni ASP)



10

decentramento / servizi - prodotti

metadata databasedigital

objects repositor

ybackoffice procedure

s

multichannel delivery servizi all’utenza

Multirepository Access Portal

metadata database digital

objects repositor

ybackoffice procedure

s

multichannel delivery servizi all’utenza

HarvesterCrawler

utenti utentiutenti



11

The Application Service Model

One fundamental benefit of ASP technology for cultural heritage sector institutions is that it offers the advantages of a fully integrated client/server architecture without theresponsibilities and costs of running an in-house system. In addition to this, while datasecurity can never be taken for granted, a competent and experienced ASP is likely to ease such concerns, and the staff are freedto concentrate on other, less technicalactivities. Essentially, ASPs give smaller cultural heritage organisations access to advanced resources, thus allowing them to offer services that they would not beable to offer individually.

DigiCULT TWR 2, February 2004, The Application Service Model, p. 15



12

content providers

service providers

educational and cultural operators

network providers

final beneficiaries

la catena del valore larger institutions and cultural networks have begun to understand that ‘access’ alone is not enough, perhaps even the wrong mind-set and approach to moving forward. People with an interest in culture, history, arts and sciences do not really benefit from simply accessing online collections. For example, there is no real benefit in gazing at images online, just as there is little acquisition of cultural knowledge when reading some descriptive information (metadata) attached to images. However, there are millions of Euros being spent on digitising heritage resources, with little likelihood of an educational, social or economic return on investment because the next step towards creating engaging cultural experiences with these resources is not being considered “From digital collections to cultural experience, learning, and knowledge”, in The Future Digital Heritage Space An Expedition Report, Digicult

Thematic Issue 7 December 2004



13



14



15

• accesso a contenuti di qualità da parte un vasto pubblico di utenti– organizzazione e presentazione dei contenuti– usabilità e qualità (progetto Minerva)

• European Cultural Website Quality Ptinciples http://www.minervaeurope.org/userneeds/qualityprinciples.htm

• Quality Principles for Cultural Web Sites http://www.minervaeurope.org/publications/qualitycommentary_en.htm

– integrazione e servizi per i beni culturali digitali• MICHAEL: Multilingual Inventory of Cultural Heritage in

Europe http://www.michael-culture.org – accessibilità degli strumenti di navigazione e fruizione

• WAI (Web Accessibility Initiative), Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 - http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

• The Museums Libraries and Archives Council: Access for All – Social Inclusion - http://www.mla.gov.uk/action/learnacc/00access_04.asp

• MLA’s We Accessibility Report - http://www.mla.gov.uk/information/publications/00pubs.asp

– utilizzazione di una pluralità di canali di erogazione



16

i task progettuali

• modalità di accesso alle risorse in formato digitale

• possibilità e regole di utilizzo delle risorse digitali

• identificazione degli utenti (chi sono, quanti sono, quali richieste esprimono)

• definizione degli obiettivi del progetto



17

il progetto

contenutimetadati

strumentitecnologie

obiettiviservizi

attoriutenti

contenutimetadati

strumentitecnologie

obiettiviservizi

attoriutenti

requirements

flussi



18

opportunità e vincoli

• lo sostenibilità finanziaria dei programmi di digitalizzazione

• la possibilità di facilitare l’accesso ai contenuti e quindi sviluppare l’utilizzo dei materiali

• l’opportunità di diversificare i prodotti e i servizi offerti, attraverso il Web e i nuovi canali di erogazione

• nuovo ruolo per gli operatori del settore



19

l’architettura dei dati



20

un modello di navigazione



21

esperienze

• l’amministrazione archivistica (www.archivi.beniculturali.it)– Siusa– Sias– la Guida generale degli archivi di Stato

• i portali nazionali– Internet culturale– Cultura Italia

• portali locali– Archivi storici della Lombardia, Plain (plain.unipv.it)– Archivi del Novecento (www.archivionline.senato.it)



22

alcuni case studies

• Archivio storico della Camera dei deputati

• Archivi digitali Enel• Archivio storico Istituto Luce• Bibliomediateca Accademia

nazionale di Santa Cecilia• Archivio di Stato i Firenze• Archivio di Stato di Napoli

Documents

Google The Handle System ⓡ Dublin Core OAI-PMH OpenURL arXiv Dspace LOCKSS