40
1 GolfLogix: Measuring the Game of Golf By: Audra Ferguson Dave Gasvoda Brett Widner March 8, 2004

GolfLogix

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

as

Citation preview

Page 1: GolfLogix

1

GolfLogix:

Measuring the Game of Golf

By: Audra Ferguson Dave Gasvoda Brett Widner

March 8, 2004

Page 2: GolfLogix

2

Introduction

A golfer 30 years ago would not be able to foresee a product that had the

capabilities to measure the exact distance to the green, tell you which club to use, and

digitally track your process. Today, such a product exists. In fact, there are many

different varieties of such products. Some golfers may view this as a hindrance to the

tradition of golf, while others welcome it as a progression in the game. Golflogix

believed that they were offering a product that golf courses would desire and that would

offer utility to the golfer’s experience. They introduced the idea of their product to the

golf courses, and three years later were contemplating the release of the device to

consumers. However, there are many things to consider with such a decision. Not only

must the company decide if there is a market for this product, but they also decide if this

idea will be profitable in the long-run. In our paper, we will look at the company,

industry, product(s), competition, affordability, price, target market, and advertising. We

will also do an analysis of our opposing group’s recommendations for GolfLogix.

Assumptions

While writing this paper, we assumed the following points:

• The readers of this case have a general knowledge of the game of golf

• We believed all of the information in this case to be true, even though some of the

information may have changed since the release of the product.

• Golf courses have a real interest in leasing this product from Golflogix, even

though there was not very much data to support this point.

Page 3: GolfLogix

3

• Readers understand that this is a recreational product and not a professional

product used on the PGA Tour.

Company

The idea behind GolfLogix originated from a post-round discussion in a golf

clubhouse. Todd Kuta and Scott Lambrecht were contemplating their club selections and

distances to the green. They agreed that they both had a hard time determining this club

selection and distance. From this discussion, the two decided they were going to work on

producing a product that provided exact yardages to the center of the green. This idea

branched into a much more complex solution including more than just distance to the

green. Things like golfer statistics would be recorded on the device, and it would be able

to print out the results of the round (1, 3).

GolfLogix worked with Garmin International to develop Global Positioning

System (GPS) for golf courses. Garmin International is a leading producer of GPS

receivers in the United States. This technology is extremely accurate, but it also comes at

a high cost (1, 4). The idea was to help golfers eliminate the guessing of yardages

throughout the golf course.

GolfLogix did a very thorough job of testing the product. They combined user

feedback, golf course input, and professional knowledge into their distance finders. After

significant prototype testing, GolfLogix produced the first system for use in the market in

early 2001 (3).

Page 4: GolfLogix

4

Industry

GolfLogix began the production of GPS in 1999 for golf courses that would allow

golfers to obtain exact yardages from anywhere on the course to the middle of the green

(1, 1). GPS technology originates from the United States Defense, who used this to assist

troops and vehicles by satellite. Once this technology became available for public use in

the 1980’s, it was used for many other things (i.e. cars) to assist in navigation (1, 4).

The idea of laser or satellite assistance for golfers can be traced back to the PGA

tour, which is where almost all golf products originate. The public notices PGA touring

professionals playing with this new technology and then they decided that they must have

it. Although this technology is illegal in tournament use, professionals use it in practice

rounds to get exact yardages marked down in their yardage books.

Many companies have put out different types of distance finders in recent years.

Products range from Distance Only finders to enhanced systems that include detailed

layouts of the golf course on a computer screen.

Product

GolfLogix has developed two different types of GPS golf technology. Both are in

the form of a handheld GPS receiver, called an “xCaddie,” which produce distance to the

center of the green (1, 1). First, they have the Distance Only System. This only provides

the yardage to the middle of the green. The second is the Complete System. This is the

enhanced version that stores more detailed information such as club selection and results

from your round. After the round, players can print off their results to take home and

study. This information can act as a teaching device because players can see what clubs

they hit, how far they hit them, and how they putted (1, 5).

Page 5: GolfLogix

5

These systems are portable, simple to operate, and very accurate. GolfLogix also

feels that golf courses that try their product will see an increase in revenue because the

pace of play will increase. This will allow for an increase in the number of rounds played

on the courses. GolfLogix also boasts that they can adapt internationally by producing

their product in different languages. This will allow for global access to the world

market. The system also offers playing tips on the screen to aid golfers who are

unfamiliar with the course (3).

Distance Only System

The Distance Only System is their lower-end model that only produces yardage to

the middle of the green. A handheld GPS receiver produces accurate yardage to aid in

club selection. It is very easy to setup on a golf course—taking only about four hours to

setup 60 units. Those who setup the system have to map out the course and download the

yardage information into the xCaddie units (1, 5). Benefits of this particular product

include exact yardage to the center of the green, faster pace of play, affordability,

compact size, and ease of installation (1, 9).

The two main points emphasized by GolfLogix with this Distance Only System

are better golf resulting from exact yardages to the green and a faster pace of play. Even

though these two things seem like great advantages, there are potential problems with this

device. First, since this product takes the thinking or guessing out of the game, it may not

appeal to the more traditional golfers. Many golfers love the history of the game of golf

and do not want to change it. Golfers see the process of pacing off the yardage to the

green and pin an intricate part of the game. PGA Tour players are constantly viewed

stepping off their distance to the pin, and it is something that has been a part of the game

Page 6: GolfLogix

6

since it originated. Conservative golfers may find it difficult to transition to this new

technology.

In addition, though the pace of play should speed up with these exact

measurements at your fingertips, it can also work the other way around. It first thought

this would speed up play, but we know from experience on the golf course that these

things can also slow down the round. People are too caught up and fascinated with these

devices and want to measure the distance from every bunker, tree, and blade of grass.

They can also forget their distance tracker in the cart, or leave it behind if they are not

careful. This new technology will most likely speed up the pace of play, but it should not

be taken for granted.

The Complete System

The Complete System goes a step beyond the Distance Only System. It provides

more information than just the yardage to the center of the green, and it is more

expensive. With this system, the pro shop can record the progress of the golfer as they

move around the golf course. It can also provide numerous advantages to the player

including a recap of the statistics such as driving accuracy, greens hit, and putts taken. In

addition, the golfer can also receive a post-round printout of their statistics to take home

with them. This characteristic really sets the Complete System apart from other systems.

This information is taken from the xCaddie and sent to a color printer through a touch-

screen kiosk. Players can keep track of their progress on their own website, which is a

link from the GolfLogix website (1, 5-9). These personalized websites offer members a

chance to follow their golf statistics throughout the year. It is a great way to get feedback

on one’s play.

Page 7: GolfLogix

7

Setup for the Complete System takes a little bit longer than for the Distance Only

System. More people will be involved taking more pictures from many additional

locations throughout the course. The time involved to set a course up for this is about

double the time it takes for the other system (1, 5).

This information will allow players to take something with them from the round.

It provides information that can serve as a teaching lesson with the feedback it offers. A

player can diagnose the reason they shot 102 or 71. The detailed information it provides,

such as where the drives missed, allows the player to notice trends and make changes

based on these results. Continuous recording and tracking on the website is a helpful tool

for serious golfers.

However, there are also potential problems with this Complete System. First, the

same argument that was made for the Distance Only System can be made with this one.

Many golfers believe in preserving the history of the game. Therefore, they do not

believe in taking the shortcuts to getting the exact yardage. These people believe golf is a

game of strategy and feel.

Another potential weakness is that this system is too complex. The golfer has to

take the time to check his or her distance to the green with the xCaddie. The player must

then enter the club he or she is using for the particular shot. Once the player reaches his

next shot, he or she must representative at the process of checking the distance and

entering the club selection. When the player finally reaches the green, he or she must

select the “putter” icon and enter the number of putts needed to hole out the putt. All of

these steps are necessary for each hole to provide accurate results after the round. The

player can then print off the results and even study them on the personalized Web page

Page 8: GolfLogix

8

dedicated to the particular golfer (1, 6). These things can take away from the enjoyment

of the round by occupying significant time throughout the course. Relying on all of this

technology can also run into trouble if the technology were to malfunction.

We contacted a golf course that was listed in the case to inquire about the

GolfLogix system. We got in touch with Arizona Traditions Golf Club head pro Paul

Crow for a short discussion on the GPS system. The case says that the golf club in

Surprise, Arizona adopted the Distance Only System in February 2002 (1, 18). However,

the golf club no longer has the GolfLogix system at their course. Mr. Crow began by

telling us that they agreed to try the Distance Only System as a toy to experiment with for

the free trial of 30 days. He explained that it did not go over as well with his members as

he originally thought. Since the Distance Only System provides yardage to the center of

the green, and nothing more, he was not convinced that the members felt obligated to use

it. One reason for this is that the members are very familiar with the course, and they

know where other yardage markers to the center of the green are located throughout the

course (6).

However, Mr. Crow did say that GolfLogix worked fairly well with non-

members. He said that they added an additional $5 on the greens fee to use the Distance

Only System. He was pleased with the revenue created by this GPS technology, but did

not feel that this particular model was sophisticate enough to take on as a permanent part

of the course. He felt that the many sprinkler heads and yardage plates were sufficient in

presenting the golfer with accurate distance to the center of the green (6).

Another complaint that he had with GolfLogix was the life of the battery. He

explained that an xCaddie unit would sometimes not last the entire day on the golf

Page 9: GolfLogix

9

course. He said that if units were sent out in the morning and then again, in the

afternoon, some units would run out of charge. Therefore, the lengths of the batteries

were not long enough (6). This is an example of a malfunction that can cause problems

for both the golfer and the golf course.

We agree with Mr. Crow and the Arizona Traditions Golf Club staff that

GolfLogix should have produced a distance locator that was tailored to the exact pin

placement on the green. We will soon explain the many other distance markers that

almost every golf course has that can rival the GolfLogix technology that only measures

to the center of the green.

GolfLogix should have been more precise with their yardages. With this exact

distance to the pin in place, the golfer could get a more accurate reading of the actual

yardage they have into the hole. Pin positions are moved multiple times during the week

at almost every golf course, and the greens are large enough to make a difference on club

selection for a front pin compared to a back pin on a green. For example, if Tiger Woods

had his ball sitting next to a sprinkler head marked with 150 yards and the pin was in the

center, Tiger would go ahead and hit his 150-yard club. However, if he was lying in the

same position but the pin was in the front, he would have much less yardage to the actual

hole location. He could only have about 135 yards on an average sized green. Pin

position makes a huge difference in club selection. Many golf courses produce pin sheets

for golfers, or have color-coded pins, to provide more detail of the exact yardage to the

pin.

We do not think that measurement to the center of the green is accurate enough to

be producing GPS technology to read. We recommend that GolfLogix be more specific

Page 10: GolfLogix

10

and produce distance finders that will provide exact yardages to the pin placements on the

greens. There are many forms of GPS that provide this type of technology. If GolfLogix

produced more specific yardage finders, they could have earned more business and

revenue. The non-specific technology that they produced may be one reason for their

limited sales in 2001.

Competition

We are now going to look at other forms of distance markers that are on the

market. The Distance Only System and the Complete System have many competitors.

We will first look at the low-tech competition to the Distance Only System. The first

type of competition includes sprinkler heads marked with distances to the center of the

green (1, 11). These heads are evenly distributed throughout the golf course to disperse

water properly. Almost every golf course has a sprinkler system and most contain

yardages on them. Another competitor are yardage markers that are placed on golf

courses (1, 11). Almost every golf course has some form of these also. For example,

they could have colored plates, poles, or shrubs that signify distances to the center of the

green.

Yardage books are another form of competition to the Distance Only System (1,

11). These books can be carried around in one’s pocket and contain numerous yardages

on every hole. For example, PGA Tour pros carry these around during their tournaments.

They can often be seen pulling them out of their pockets when they are contemplating

club selection. Yardage books are usually found at resort courses, high-end public

courses, and private clubs. There are also rangefinders that provide distances to the

green. They vary in quality and price, but they can be used to locate the yardage to

Page 11: GolfLogix

11

almost any target. This type of assistance is illegal in United States Golf Association

tournament play (1, 11).

One of the most common rangefinders is the Bushnell Yardage Pro. The product

is a laser rangefinder that produces exact distances (2). This is different from GolfLogix

products because is uses a laser, and the golf course does not have to be specifically

adapted to it before usage. This product can be used anywhere because the laser can be

positioned to reflect off any target to produce an extremely accurate yardage reading.

Another type of competition to the basic Distance Only System is a laser gun.

These devices are very easy to use, because all one has to do is point it at the pin and

click the button. This provides exact distance to the pin. Since pin positions are

frequently moved around the green, the laser receiver on top of the stick also moves to

provide accurate distance to the pin. These handheld devices are gaining popularity

throughout the golf industry.

All of the things listed above are direct competition to the Distance Only System

because it only produces yardage to the center of the green. The competition is already in

place on many golf courses (i.e. sprinkler heads and yardage markers), and courses do not

feel that the new product will provide much more value than what they already have.

We will now move on to the competitors of the high-tech Complete System.

There are competitors such as cart-mounted systems and PDA-based systems. There are

many different types of cart-mounted systems available. However, not many PDA-based

systems are on the market to this point, and not a whole lot of information is available on

them. We do not consider them a strong competitor to the Complete System at this time.

Page 12: GolfLogix

12

The cart-mounted systems have video units attached to the roofs of the carts and

provide things including a visual of the hole, pin placement, distance to the pin,

communication with the pro shop, electronic score keeping, food ordering capability, and

the pro shop can keep track of a cart’s progress throughout the golf course (1, 11). These

computer systems are very detailed.

We contacted a golf course that had a cart-mounted system produced by Parview.

Though this system is mounted on the cart, it is still very comparable to the Complete

System by GolfLogix. We discussed the Parview system with Todd Smith of Rock

Hollow Golf Club in Peru, Indiana. He said that the golf course leased the systems for

about two years. He said they did have many problems with malfunctions of the system.

For example, the computer would produce a yardage to a pin that was not accurate. He

elaborated by saying he felt the company did not fix all of the glitches before the release.

After spending frequent time attempting to fix these problems, he and Rock Hollow

decided to send them back to Parview (7). Though this may have been a one-time error

for Parview, we feel that the risk is out there for this computer technology. Rock Hollow

Golf Club has since moved to laser guns that can get an exact reading to a pin location.

GolfLogix has the potential to separate themselves from these competitors.

Making more specific yardage finders will set them apart from things like sprinkler

heads, and it will provide more satisfaction to the golfer wanting exact yardages.

Affordability

Affordability is a main issue to look at when assessing whether this product will

sell. One must analyze if a golf course is able to put forth the expense to acquire

Page 13: GolfLogix

13

GolfLogix. To do this we will examine the operating and expense statements, the cost of

the setup and the product, and an analysis of each type of course.

Operating and Expense Statements for a Typical High-End Public Golf Course (in thousands) Operating Revenues (1, 22): Greens Fees $1,500 Golf Cart Rental $300 Driving Range Fees $200 Pro Shop Merchandise $200 Food and Beverage $300 Total $2500 Operating Expenses: Course operations/Maintenance $700 Golf Operations $400 Food and Beverage $300 General and Administrative $400 Total $1800 Net Operating Income $700 From this income statement, it is very clear that high-end golf courses are only

making a net income of about $700,000 per year. This is not very much when you

consider the other businesses that are making millions in net income a year. Therefore,

this leaves little room to be able to spend on other things. It is clear that the operation of

a golf course is very expensive and that product rental (i.e. golf cart rental) makes up only

a small portion of the revenues of a golf course. Now we will look at what happens to the

income statement when we add in the expense of GolfLogix. To do this, we are going to

consider the worst-case scenario. That is if they cannot rent any of the GolfLogix out to

golfers. We will consider that they have a Distance Only unit. It is renting at $1500 per

month.

Page 14: GolfLogix

14

Operating Revenues (1): Greens Fees $1,500 Golf Cart Rental $300 Driving Range Fees $200 Pro Shop Merchandise $200 Food and Beverage $300 Total $2500 Operating Expenses: Course operations/Maintenance $700 GolfLogix $180 Golf Operations $400 Food and Beverage $300 General and Administrative $400 Total $1980 Net Operating Income $520 The implementation of GolfLogix brought down the Net Operating Income by

$180,000. With a Complete System, the Net Operating Income would be decreased to

$460. However, this is the worst-case scenario. It is unlikely that a golf course would

not be able to rent out any of the units. However, this does show a concern that is in the

mind of the golf courses’. “What if we cannot rent them?” To ease this concern,

GolfLogix must be sure that they target the golf courses that feel that they will be able to

recover the cost of the product. This will be discussed in further detail when we discuss

the target market.

Cost of Setup

The cost of the setup should be a concern for the company. The cost of the setup

for the Distance Only unit is only about $500 per golf course and it takes one employee a

total of six hours (1, 5). However, the Complete System costs about $7,000 per golf

course and it takes a team of employees about twelve hours. It also costs about $100,000

per year to maintain the Web site that is necessary for the Complete System (1, 5). With

Page 15: GolfLogix

15

this in mind, GolfLogix must be sure that the consumer is satisfied with the Complete

System so that they will keep the system for a long period. If consumer keeps the

Complete System for only a trial period, GolfLogix just lost $7,000 not including the cost

of the Web site. Therefore when selling these systems, it is GolfLogix’s responsibility to

help ensure that the golf course will be satisfied with the product that they choose and

that they will be able to rent it out to their golfers. If they are not able to rent this product

out to their golfers, GolfLogix will lose out in the money already invested into that golf

course if they want to send the product back.

Analysis of Each Type of Course

As we could see from the net operating income of a high-end public golf course,

they could afford it. They will, however, lose money if it was implemented but could not

rent it out. Now we will look at the net operating income of a municipal course and

private course. A municipal course has a net operating income of $660,000 (10). They,

too, can afford it. However as mentioned earlier, it is more that just being able to afford

this product. GolfLogix must be sure that the golf course will be able to rent it out; if not,

they will cancel the product during the trial period and GolfLogix will be out the original

outlay cost.

A private course, on average, has a net operating income of less than that of a

municipal course. It has a net operating income of $440,000 (10). However, you must

also consider if a private course will be able to rent out the product more than a municipal

course. The target market will be discussed later in further detail.

Page 16: GolfLogix

16

Price

The price that is offered is a key component in decision making by a company.

When we analyze the price, we will analyze the type of payment form offered to the golf

courses, type of payment form suggested rent for the consumer, and any discounts and

allowances that will be offered.

However prior to investigating the type of price that is offered, we must look at

the price sensitivity of golf courses. There are a number of things that influence price

sensitivity. The first is substitute ways. In the golf industry, there are substitute ways to

measure distance. There are yardage markers, sprinkler headers, and yardage books (1,

11). Therefore, for this factor, they would be fairly price sensitive. The second

consideration is the ease of the golf courses to compare prices. It is easier for the golf

courses to compare prices for the substitutes listed, but it is difficult to compare prices of

a product exactly like GolfLogix because there is not a product exactly like it. The

greater the total expenditure is the greater the price sensitivity. This will be evaluated in

Price

Golf Course Payment Form

Consumer Payment Form

Discounts and Allowance

Page 17: GolfLogix

17

the lease versus buy discussion. Customers will also be less price sensitive if they

already have a sunk investment that is related to the purchase (11).

Golf Course Payment Form

When offering this product to a golf course, we must analyze the type of payment

form that will be offered. Currently, golf courses are allowed to lease the product only

(1, 1). However, there are more options than just to lease. We will look at all of the

options that could be available. These include continuing to offer a lease, having the golf

courses buy the system, or offering a lease with the option to buy.

Currently, golf courses are offered a standard lease. The golf courses pay to use

the system on a three-year lease, and when they are done with the system, they have no

further obligation. This has its pros and cons. This is good because it is easier for both

the golf course and GolfLogix. The golf course is obligated to only a set period, three

years. Therefore, there is not a big, long-term obligation. This is also bad because some

golf courses may be worried about obligating themselves to three years on a product that

they have not used before. However, it makes it better because if a golf course continues

to renew the lease then they have the potential to make more of their money back.

However, this is bad because it does not lock the golf course in. If the golf course is not

satisfied, then they can send the product back and GolfLogix is back to where they

started.

There is also the option to just sell the product. Instead of offering a lease,

GolfLogix would offer a set price and try to sell the system to the golf courses. This is

good because it locks in the golf course. They must buy the product. GolfLogix will not

have to worry about the golf course wanting to get out of buying the product. However,

Page 18: GolfLogix

18

this is bad because the product is new. Therefore, golf courses might be unsure if they

want to spend the money on a product that might not be successful. There is a definite

risk in investing your money into a product that has not proven its self to be successful.

There would also be a high cost involved in purchasing the product and golf courses

might not be able to forth that much money.

The payment form we suggest offering is a lease with the option to buy. This

would give the consumer and the golf course a medium between a lease and a purchase.

This would give the consumer the comfort of knowing that they have the ability to try the

product out before committing themselves. However, this also gives them the option to

purchase the product. If the golf course feels that this product is something that their

golfers really enjoy, then they can purchase the system. It does give the golf course a

time to try the product out with little risk. The risk is less than the lease and the purchase.

That is because they still have the ability to try it with only a set time commitment, but

they also have the ability to purchase it if they like it. If a golf course decides that they

do not want to purchase it when the option to buy comes up, then they can continue to

lease it. This is also good for the company because if the golf course does purchase the

product then they have committed themselves. This also helps to alleviate the price

sensitivity of the consumer, because as mentioned earlier, consumers will be les price

sensitive if they already have a sunken investment related to the purchase. Therefore, if

they have already been leasing they product, then they will be less price sensitive if they

choose to purchase the product.

Page 19: GolfLogix

19

Consumer Payment Form

To ensure that the golf courses continue to use GolfLogix, it is the responsibility

of the sales personnel to offer suggestions to the golf course as to how to rent the system

to their golfers. There are three options here. The golf course could include the cost in

the greens fees, charge individually, or do a combination of both.

If a golf course included the cost in the greens fees, they could be assured that

they would be able to make their money back because every customer would be paying

for the system whether or not they use it. However, a problem with this would be that the

golf course would offer the product “complimentary” to each golfer so they would have

to be sure that they have enough of the devices to give to each golfer that plays. They

would also be charging a higher price than other golf courses because the cost of the

GolfLogix system would be included in the fees. Therefore, some consumers who may

not want to pay the higher cost might go to another golf course. There would also be the

golfers who do not want to use the system but would still end up having to pay for it in

their greens fees. By charging it into the greens fees, this will also increase the overall

revenue of the golf course.

The golf course could charge each golfer individually. This would keep the

greens fees lower. It would also ensure that the golfers that are being charged are only

the ones that are using the system. The problem with this is that if not enough golfers try

the product then the golf course will be losing money on it. Many golfers would not be

willing to pay the extra amount on top of the greens fees either. This causes the problem

that some golfers might not even try the system because of the cost.

Page 20: GolfLogix

20

The payment that we suggest golf courses offer is a combination of the two. A

golf course should include half of the price in the greens fees and the other half should be

charged individually. This would help cover some of the costs and alleviate the problem

of charging everyone for use of the system. This would also keep the costs of renting the

system down so that golfers might be more inclined to try the system if it does not cost

very much. Then the golfers do not feel like they are out anything if they do not like the

system. If only half of the price of the system is charged into the greens fees, then

consumers will not notice the price difference as much because it will be minimal.

Overall revenues would be increased as well.

Actual Price

We would suggest that GolfLogix continue to charge a price of $1500 for the

Distance Only System. However, we feel that they should raise the cost of the Complete

System to $2500. This would help to cover the expense involved in setting up this

system and ensure that only serious customers get this system. This would mean that

they would be less likely to cancel the system after the first month.

For the consumer, GolfLogix was suggesting that the golf courses only charge

about $1 or $2. We feel this is not enough. With a price of $2 on a Distance Only

System, they would have to rent out 750 units a month to break even. This seems a little

unreasonable, especially in the beginning. We suggest that the golf courses charge an

average price of $2 per unit and increase the greens fees by $2 for a Distance Only

System and $5 per unit with an increase in the greens fees by $5 for a Complete System.

These would vary depending on the course type. A course, such as a private course,

would probably charge more. We would also suggest that the golf courses implement the

Page 21: GolfLogix

21

greens fee increase at the beginning of the year because golfers will be less likely to

notice a big change.

Discounts and Allowances

In order to help promote the product, GolfLogix would offer a discount to golf

courses. This would help to get golf courses to adopt the GolfLogix system more readily.

In order to do this, we suggest GolfLogix offer a quantity discount, a referral discount,

and a discount for trying the system.

By offering a quantity discount, they would be offering a price reduction to golf

courses that buy in large volumes (12, 310). The discount would be “[b] uy 6 months, get

the 7th month half off.” This would encourage commitment on the part of the golf course.

This would create an incentive for golf courses to commit to a lease further into the

future. This would help to relieve the problem of price sensitivity.

With a referral discount, a golf course would receive a discount if they refer

another golf course to the GolfLogix system and that golf course implements the system.

This would provide an incentive for golf courses to spread, by word of mouth, the

benefits of the GolfLogix system. If a golf course did refer the system to another golf

course, the original golf course and the golf course that was referred would receive a

certain percentage off one their monthly payment. We suggest a 10% off for one month.

The discount would create an incentive for golf courses to refer the system to their

competitors, other golf courses. We do not feel that golf courses would probably do this;

however, this would be available if golf courses chose to make a referral. Golf courses

would not want to recommend a successful product to their competitors, for fear of the

competitors stealing customers away.

Page 22: GolfLogix

22

GolfLogix was offering a one-month free trial to golf courses that tried out their

system (1, 1). This has many faults however. The system is very costly to setup.

Therefore, if they setup the free trial and at 30 days the golf course does not want the

system, then GolfLogix is out thousands of dollars. It also does not create an incentive

for the golf courses to keep it because they do not have any costs sunk into the product.

GolfLogix should offer 50% off for the first three months. This would be more costly to

GolfLogix if the golf course kept the product for three month. For a Distance Only

System, if would be equivalent to a discount of $2250. This is opposed to the one month

free where the discount is $1500. However, we feel this discount is better because it

forces the golf course to put some money into the product so they are less likely to send it

back.

Target Market The correct target market is the key to long-term success of any product.

GolfLogix must be able to determine who their customer is in order to develop an

advertising plan that will sell the customer on the benefits of their product. Currently,

GolfLogix is torn between targeting consumers or golf courses. If they target consumers,

the golf courses that they have secured may get upset and drop their product. If

GolfLogix decides to just target golf courses, there is a good possibility that they may

miss a significant amount of revenue that stems from consumers (1, 13).

To make the correct decision, it would be smart of GolfLogix to breakdown each

option and weigh the pros and cons. If GolfLogix decided to go straight to consumers

and bypass golf courses, a number of things would happen. First, GolfLogix would have

a good chance of making quick money. Consumers would purchase the product quickly,

Page 23: GolfLogix

23

thus exposing the product to everyone. There are obviously more consumers than golf

courses, meaning that sales growth is almost infinite if the company is able to continue

selling consumers on the idea and benefits of the product.

However, there are significant “cons” as well. GolfLogix may not want to roll

their product out this quick. A quick release could mean a “fad.” Fads go fast and hard.

They make a considerable amount of money very fast and then consumers get sick of the

product and move on. By releasing a product slowly, you “massage” the idea of the

product into the consumer’s life (or golf game). They begin to accept it as part of the

game and the product life cycle becomes significantly longer than if it were released

quickly. In addition, consumers are unable to use this product on courses that have not

been set up for it. GolfLogix does not want to get in a situation where consumers are

purchasing their product and getting upset because they are unable to use it.

Consumers Only Pros Cons

Make quick money Could be considered a fad More consumers than golf courses Short product life cycle Near infinite amount of revenue stream Golf course not set up

There are pros and cons to the idea of only selling the product to only golf courses

as well. If GolfLogix sold their product to just golf courses, they would take advantage

of rolling their product out slowly. Consumers would then only be able to use the

product at specific times in specific places. The golfing community would have the

ability to slowly adapt the product into their golf games and allow it to become

commonplace in their sport. GolfLogix would also be securing guaranteed revenue based

on rental contracts from golf courses. If GolfLogix were able to secure a number of

Page 24: GolfLogix

24

courses nationwide, they would not necessarily have to worry all that much about the

number of consumer rentals. The golf courses would be the ones having to always worry

if they are meeting their GolfLogix product breakeven point. GolfLogix would already

have their guaranteed cash flow.

However, it is a given that GolfLogix would not make the amount of revenue

through golf courses that they could potentially make with consumers. Selling to

consumers is a significant amount of revenue to look away from, and it is always a tough

decision to not sell to your potential.

Golf Courses Only

Pros Cons Consumers slowly adapt to product Loss of more potential revenue Secure guaranteed revenue stream Can only use product at course

Because GolfLogix is in a difficult position, we offer the following proposal of

who GolfLogix should sell to:

GolfLogix is torn between marketing their product to either golf courses or

consumers. We believe they should put almost all focus on upscale courses and a small

focus on consumers. This mixture is not in a general sense. It is very specific and must

be executed that way in order for this proposal to be as effective as possible.

We propose that GolfLogix should focus their products on these markets: the

high-end municipal courses, private courses, and resort courses (upscale) and consumers.

The main target market that GolfLogix should focus on is the upscale courses.

These courses are able to afford GolfLogix products because of high membership fees or

greens fees. Members to these courses pay a lot of money to play golf and expect only

Page 25: GolfLogix

25

the best. GolfLogix has a real opportunity to exploit this niche market if they are able to

convince the golf professionals who head-up these courses that their product is top of the

line. GolfLogix will have to focus their attention on each course’s golf pros. The head

professional typically makes golf course decisions. Whether it is player turnover, labor

decisions, or budget matters, the golf pro is always on top of it. GolfLogix will have to

be willing to spend time selling to these professionals on a personal basis. We suggest

that the personal sales representatives show the golf pros how the product works, the

benefits of its use, and the positive effect it can have on the attitudes of the members.

You must remember: membership fees pay for the course! Golf pros are open to any

ideas that will keep membership fees pouring in and members satisfied.

We believe that the top revenue generator should be the Complete System. The

Complete System offers the same features as the Distance Only product, but includes a

number of extra features as well (as explained in our section on the product). With

features that include distance to various landmarks on the course, a kiosk to keep track of

your specific shots, and a printout to further investigate your game strategy, this system

was built for high-end public courses, resort courses, and private courses. These three

types of courses are being built at a higher rate than any other type of course (1, 8). It is

imperative that GolfLogix exploit this market if they plan to have future success with this

product.

Consumers are a very small secondary market. These consumers are frequent,

avid golfers. They have low handicaps, are members at private courses, and are major

subscribers to both golf magazines and the Golf Channel. This consumer sect would be

considered the “innovators” of the game of golf. We believe GolfLogix could be

Page 26: GolfLogix

26

successful in this market for a number of reasons. First, these types of players have the

money and the curiosity to purchase this product. They spend a significant amount of

time on the course and are always looking to improve their game. These golfers also

travel to play famous and difficult courses. Having their own product will allow them to

play courses that have been set up for the GolfLogix distance product and save money

while doing it. They play so many rounds, that in the long run, these golfers will save

money. This consumer sect includes professionals as well. Golf pros run courses and

would be a solid revenue generator if GolfLogix were able to secure them as consumers.

Not only would the professionals purchase the product, but they might be more apt to

purchase the Complete System for their course as well.

It should be noted that consumer markets should not be GolfLogix focus. We are

suggesting this as a small option for those who are curious and/or hardcore golfers. The

product is very limited because courses must already be setup before they are able to use

it and we suggest that GolfLogix only sell this product through the golf courses that

have been set up for the product. In the end, if GolfLogix is able to introduce its product

onto a number of courses around the nation, there is a chance that the consumer market

for this product may grow. Until this happens, GolfLogix’s focus should be on selling to

the golf course.

Advertising Plan

One of the keys for growing marketing and sales numbers is a successful

advertising plan. A successful advertising plan carries out the manufacturers message to

the consumer and tells them why and how to purchase their product. GolfLogix finds

Page 27: GolfLogix

27

itself in this current situation. They must find a way to let the golf world know about

their latest product and advertising is the most effective way to do it.

Regional Marketing Because golf is an outside sport, the weather is always a factor. Some courses

may not be able to afford GolfLogix’s products because they are not open long enough to

sustain enough revenue to pay for it. We recommend that GolfLogix begin by focusing

on courses that are at least open for nine months out of the year. Resort and prestigious

courses are typically found in the south/ southwest regions of the United States. Since

these are GolfLogix’s focus, we recommend that GolfLogix send their initial sales

representatives to this region. In time, hopefully product awareness will allow GolfLogix

to move further north, but in the mean time, we suggest they start south.

Short and Long Term Advertising Plans

Since GolfLogix is introducing a relatively new product, we recommend a short-

term advertising plan, along with a long-term advertising plan. We suggest that

GolfLogix focus on the following categories: Budget, Market Focus, Media, and Goal.

Short Term (1 – 3 years) Budget

The first step that GolfLogix needs to take is creating an advertising budget. An

advertising budget is a good way to keep track of how much money is being spent on

advertising and keeps the company on track for future sales. GolfLogix should start by

determining a certain amount of money to spend on each specific category. The amounts

should be based on how much can they afford, how effective each specific outlet is going

Page 28: GolfLogix

28

to be at getting the company’s message out, and how effective each outlet is going to be

at securing on-going sales figures.

Market Focus Targeting the correct market during the short-term period is very important.

GolfLogix has a limited number of resources and must use them efficiently if they plan to

get high revenues. We recommend that GolfLogix target the golf professionals at high-

end municipal courses, private courses, and resort courses and there is a chance that the

hardcore golfer may fall into this category as well. The three types of courses should be

the focus, while the hardcore golfers would be considered a bonus. Expensive courses

have the money and interest in purchasing accessories. They will be much more willing

to spend their money on GolfLogix’s product, versus the small public courses that are

very attached to their budgets.

Media GolfLogix short term advertising plan should utilize the following outlets to

reveal their product message to the golf world: trade magazines, the Golf Channel and

TV commercials during golf tournaments, trade shows, a spokesperson, and personal

sales representatives.

Trade magazines are very specific in their consumer targets. We suggest that

GolfLogix purchase advertising space in golf magazines, like Golf Digest. A high

percentage of hardcore golfers and golf professionals are subscribers to this magazine and

magazines like this.

Our next suggestion would be to purchase advertising space on the Golf Channel.

This television channel is dedicated to hardcore golfers and would be a great place to get

Page 29: GolfLogix

29

GolfLogix’s product seen. Many times, you may find this channel on in the Pro Shops of

many courses, and it would be a very specific way to target the markets that GolfLogix

would be aiming for. This is a great way to increase the golfer’s demand for the

GolfLogix’s products. An increase in demand by consumers may put some pressure on

golf courses to implement the GolfLogix distance technology. Although expensive,

GolfLogix should try to purchase advertising space during televised golf tournaments.

This would target both the hardcore golfers, as well as the golf professionals. Building

product awareness is important, and there is no better way than to introduce your product

to the thousands and thousands who are watching these televised golf tournaments.

The third suggestion we would make would be to introduce this product at

specific golf trade shows going on across America. For example, the nation’s largest golf

show is in Orlando, Florida each winter. This is where new products are revealed for the

first time. GolfLogix could introduce their product and purchase an area to show all of

the professionals in attendance the benefits of their product. Trade shows are just one

more way to specifically target certain market segments.

Our next suggestion is that GolfLogix think about a professional spokesperson.

Utilizing professional spokespeople is great, in that consumers develop a connection

between the product and spokesperson. Spokespeople can be very expensive, we suggest

that GolfLogix try to get an old golfer or up and coming rookie for their product.

Our final and most important suggestion would be using personal sales

representatives to do a lot of selling. This product almost requires a representative to be

there to show the consumer certain benefits and qualities of the product. The

representative would then also be there to answer any questions or help the golf pro fit

Page 30: GolfLogix

30

GolfLogix’s product into their budget. There is no better advertising than personal

advertising. If GolfLogix is able to hire a number of quality sales representatives, we

believe they will be very successful with this product.

Goal

All advertising plans have a goal and GolfLogix should be no different. We

recommend that GolfLogix’s plan for the short-term advertising plan is to raise product

awareness. This product is new for the company, and if the company expects long-term

success, they must get their name and product information out to their respective target

markets. Golf professionals and hardcore golfers across the United States should be able

to recognize this product by the time the short-term advertising plan has been completed.

Assumptions Taken From Short Term

We are going to assume at this point that the short term advertising plan was

successful in creating awareness about GolfLogix products. We are also going to assume

that golf courses have now started to implement GolfLogix’s products into their courses

and many hardcore golfers have had a chance to use the products.

Long Term (3 – 10 years) The long term advertising plan is a little different than the short-term advertising

plan. Now that golf courses are beginning to implement the products into their courses

and many golfers have had a chance to try the product, it is time to alter the advertising

plan in order to stay efficient towards the company’s sales goals.

Budget Once GolfLogix is able to achieve product awareness with the distance only and

Complete Systems, it is time to change the advertising budget. More money is going to

Page 31: GolfLogix

31

be needed to continue funding commercials, magazine advertisements, sponsorships, a

spokesperson’s fee, and for personal sales representative. Continual funding to

advertising is important in almost every business. Advertising is what speaks to the

consumer, and over the long run, GolfLogix does not want to lose the edge that they have

gained in the last three years.

Media As the product evolves, the advertising does as well. GolfLogix is in a situation

where they have the opportunity to use a number of different media outlets and still stay

market specific. However, it is now time to put more of an advertising focus on the

consumer. GolfLogix should go back to traditional media outlets. For example,

magazine advertisements, Golf Channel commercials, a spokesperson, and sponsorships

are GolfLogix’s best chance at continuing to attract new consumers, yet stay specific to

the market they have chosen.

Market We recommend that GolfLogix slightly alter the markets that they had been

advertising to the first few years. Since we have assumed that golf courses are now

implementing the product into their courses, now would be a good time to put more of a

focus on selling to the consumer. If GolfLogix is able to capture just a small percentage

of hardcore golfers, there is a very good chance that they will make a lot of money.

It should be noted that we want to still focus on the golf courses. Golfers cannot

use the GolfLogix products if the golf course is not set up for it. Therefore, it is still very

important that the golf course remain a very strong focus for GolfLogix in the end.

Page 32: GolfLogix

32

Goal

The goal of the long-term plan should be that GolfLogix products will become

commonplace in the world of golf. GolfLogix should want golf pros to begin to feel

pressure from their consumers to either start implementing GolfLogix’s designs or

continue using them. A potential 80/20 situation, 80% sales coming from course rentals

and 20% of sales coming from consumer purchases, is a good situation for GolfLogix to

be in. As long as consumer sales do not severely rise, GolfLogix is in position up to be

successful in the end.

Analysis of Opposing Group’s Paper

Pg. 5 – “The distance only system allows golfers to collect the data from their games by standing in the middle of the green. After recording the data, the xCaddie will allow the golfer to look up information during the next time of play on that particular hole.” This statement is inaccurate. The Distance Only system does NOT work like that.

The only purpose of the Distance Only System is to provide distance to the center of the

green for golfers playing the particular hole. GolfLogix is responsible for mapping out

the course and recording the distances to the center of each green (1, 5). We think that

the presenting group misinterpreted these facts. They think that the golfer has to collect

and record the distance to the center of the green before the round.

Page 33: GolfLogix

33

Pg. 6 – “If the golfer does not have a computer at home and cannot download their information, the system is useless. Also, if a golf course does not happen to have a kiosk available, it would cause golfers to stray away from purchasing the device independently because it would require a lot of extra effort to find an Internet connection to allow them to save their data.”

The Complete System is not useless if the golfer does not have a computer at

home. They can get the printout from the golf course before the leave. This is the same

information that is available on the Internet, but it is just an additional way of viewing it.

The case states that: “[a] Complete System required a touch-screen kiosk

(connected to the Internet) and a high-quality printer” (1, 5). This being said, there

should not be an instance where a golf course does not have a kiosk available. It comes

with the package of the Complete System; therefore, we feel this statement is irrelevant.

Pg. 8 – “At the end of a round during which the Complete System was used, the golfer will go to the GolfLogix kiosk in the course’s clubhouse and be able to print off, in full color, three pages detailing and outlining his or her performance throughout the game.”

This contradicts the previous point they made because they said the golf course

might not have a kiosk available to print out the round statistics. The point is that the

same information is available through the kiosk and the personalized Web page. We do

not think they understand that the kiosk is required, and it comes with the Complete

System.

Pg. 8– “They (GolfLogix products) could be new unsought products, because they offer a new idea that some potential customers might not even know about yet.”

We do not necessarily believe that this is a new, unsought product because most

golfers should be very familiar with this idea. GPS became public a long time ago and

has been used in golf courses, and with other technology, in recent years. Almost every

Page 34: GolfLogix

34

golfer should be familiar with this product. This has been a major topic in the golf

industry, and it is gaining popularity and coverage among all golfers. We feel it is an

established product because golfers throughout the world recognize it.

Pg 17 – They say that yardage markers and sprinkler heads do not provide competition to

GolfLogix. However, things like yardage markers, sprinkler heads, and yardage books

are direct competitors to the Distance Only system, while the GPS, PDA, and portable

GPS are competitors to the Complete System. The Distance Only System, along with

yardage markers and sprinkler heads, provide yardages to the center of the green.

This is why we suggested that GolfLogix be more specific with yardages. They

should make the yardages accurate to the pin location. If they only measure distance to

the center of the green, many golf courses do not see the advantages that this provides.

They already have yardages to the center with yardage markers and sprinkler heads

dispersed throughout the golf course. Golf professionals may not feel that any value

would be added with the GolfLogix products.

Pg 27 –“… it would be hard for an individual to obtain the necessary information needed to map out each individual course on which he or she chooses to golf.”

The presenting group does not understand the product or how it works. The

individual golfer does not collect the distance information before they play. All if this

information is programmed in to the xCaddie is by GolfLogix employees when they set

up the course. The statement they made may refer to the PDA devices. With these

systems, the golfer needs to map out the course (1, 12).

Page 35: GolfLogix

35

This being said, there are no labor hours necessary by the golfer to prepare for

using the GolfLogix technology. They also mentioned that the above quotation

concludes that golfers will not take the time to prepare their xCaddie for each golf course.

However, it does not matter how often a golfer visits a particular course. Since he or she

does not do any pre-round preparation, the golfer can walk into the pro shop, obtain an

xCaddie, and step on the course and find the distance to the center of the green.

Pg -19 “…if growth occurred in municipal and lower-end sectors, that it could hurt GPS systems.

While this could be true, the case states that newer courses are being built, but

most of these courses are “higher-ended pubic, resort, or private courses” (1, 8).

Therefore, it is highly unlikely that we are going to see growth, of municipal and lower-

ended sectors, that is substantial enough to hurt the GPS systems. The growth in higher-

ended sectors will over compensate for growth that occurs in the lower-ended sectors.

Price p.10

Price is also a major consideration when evaluating a product. We feel that the

presenting group did not sufficiently do this. They examined the price by simply

breaking down the price of each individual unit. While this can be useful, it is only

useful when used along with another type of analysis. The group did not suggest if this

price was adequate, too high, or too low. They also did not make use of the financials

that are given in the case (1, 22). This can be useful in estimating if a golf course would

be able to afford to lease this product. When considering price, it also must thought

about the method of payment that golf courses will use. Currently golf courses are using

Page 36: GolfLogix

36

a lease, but once again, they did not address whether or not this is adequate for the golf

courses.

Pg 10 – “There are little to no immediate substitutes for the products”

The group argues their opinion on whether or not the product is price sensitive or

price insensitive. Their argument for the product being price sensitive is that consumers

who are unaware of the product will continue to stay unaware because of high prices. In

other words, they would be unwilling to try a product that is so expensive. This point is

valid. However, they also suggest that the product is price insensitive. They say that the

product has “little to no immediate substitutes,” therefore consumers are willing to pay

any price for it. This completely contradicts the bulk of their paper, which is both

industry and competitor analysis. The group lists numerous competitors that GolfLogix

is directly and indirectly competing with.

Consider the following three statements: Pg – 10 “The company does not sell directly to the consumer, but rather to a golf store or even to the golf courses, who will in turn offer the product to their customers at a slightly marked-up price.” (It should be noted that this statement is contradicted later at the bottom of pg 28:

“Golf courses would not receive these additional streams of revenue if golfers brought

their own GPS systems. This may strain relationships with golf courses if the courses

lose out on additional revenue. This is especially true with courses that charge an

additional fee for golfers to use the GPS systems.”)

Page 37: GolfLogix

37

Pg – 28 “GolfLogix is not leaving out the consumers as a target because they are being indirectly targeted through the advertising at the golf courses.” Pg – 28 “After analyzing GolfLogix and its competitors, we feel that GolfLogix should not develop a direct-to-consumer version of its xCaddie.” After reading these three examples, it is impossible to decide how the group

decided to handle the issue of consumers. First, they say that GolfLogix should offer the

product to the golf courses or golf stores and let them sell to the consumer. Then, they

say that it is not a big deal if the consumers are left out of the mix because they are being

indirectly targeted. Finally, they say that GolfLogix should leave consumers out

altogether. This example of gross indecision and vague statements prove our inability to

draw specific conclusions from their paper. The group never says how the issue of

targeting consumers should be handled and how GolfLogix should go about dealing with

the issue.

Pg 18 – “The first threat is the legality of using a GPS system during a round of golf.”

The group’s main industry threat is the legality of using a GPS system during

tournament play (USGA Rule 14-3b). They suggest that the product and its industry will

suffer based on the USGA rule. What they do not understand is whom they are targeting

with this product. First, they have not really stated who their specific market is, and

second, because GolfLogix would not be targeting professional golfers anyway.

Professional golfers would be the only ones affected by this rule, and they still may want

to purchase this product for their own personal practice. The game of golf is more

recreational than competitive. Golfers are more interested in improving their own game

Page 38: GolfLogix

38

and enjoying the scenery, than worrying whether or not this product is going to keep

them out of the USGA.

Pg 27 – “The number of golfers grows by about 200,000 to 400,000 each year. For this reason, we feel it would be hard for GolfLogix to target the individual consumer because there are so many of them and not all are avid golfers.” (Gourville 7).

To start, the group cited this statement in their paper and it is not on page 7. The

statement also does not make any sense. Companies do not purposely stay away from

targeting certain markets because there are too many consumers. GolfLogix should not

advertise to consumers because they are not able to use the product on golf courses that

are not set up for it. It just makes more sense to have courses lease from GolfLogix. It

has absolutely nothing to do with the size of the golf market. If anything, that is a good

problem to have.

Pg 27 – “We feel that GolfLogix should target the private courses rather than targeting directly to the consumers or public courses. Although a large percentage of golfers golf… paying dues at their private course.” (Ends at top of 28).

The above statement is true, but is has absolutely no bearing on why GolfLogix

should market to private, upscale, golf courses. GolfLogix should market their products

to upscale courses, because they have both the budget and the type of golfers who would

use this product. GolfLogix should not market their product to low-end municipal

courses because they do not have the money to lease it, but because there is a high golfer

turnover.

Page 39: GolfLogix

39

Conclusion

We feel that the presenting group did not make the adequate recommendations for

GolfLogix. It is very difficult to do this without understanding the product. The

presenting group did not fully understand the workings of the product, so it made it

difficult for them to analyze it correctly. They did, however, do a very thorough job of

laying out all the competitors. However, their final decisions were not adequately

supported as to why GolfLogix should do (or not do) this.

After making the necessary changes, we believe that GolfLogix could have a very

solid product. They must be sure that their product continues to offer the functionality

that golfers want. In addition, we feel that GolfLogix should target the higher-end public

golf courses, resorts, and private golf courses. This provides the most opportunity for

GolfLogix to capture the golf courses that would be more willing to lease the device. We

also feel that to sell to these golf courses, GolfLogix should use personal representatives.

The method of payment offered to golf courses would be a lease with the option to buy.

This would give golf courses the range of options to satisfy the different net incomes and

demand. We feel that GolfLogix has room to grow before they move out of the golf

course sector, because golf courses have to be mapped out for the system to work.

Therefore, GolfLogix should continue to sell their product to golf courses.

Page 40: GolfLogix

40

Works Cited

1. “GolfLogix: Measuring the Game of Golf.” Harvard Business School. 7 Oct 2002.

2. http://www.bushnell.com

3. http://www.golflogix.com

4. http://www.parview.com

5. http://www.greenf.com/golf.htm

6. Telephone Interview on March 4, 2004 at 2:00 pm with Paul Crow-PGA

Professional at Arizona Traditions Golf Club, 17225 North Citrus Road, Surprise, AZ 85374. Phone Number: (623) 584-4000.

7. Telephone Interview on March 5, 2004 at 11:00 am with Todd Smith-PGA

Professional at Rock Hollow Golf Club, P.O. Box 187, County Road 250 West, Peru, IN 46970. Phone Number: (765) 473-6100.

8. http://www.laserlinkgolf.com/golfweek.pdf

9. http://www.garmin.co.uk/pressroom/corporate/020101.html

10. http://econres.com/documents/issue_papers/pencil_out_your_golf.html

11. Perreault, William D, Jr., and E Jerome McCarthy. Basic Marketing- A Global-Managerial Approach. 14th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 2002.

12. Armstrong, Gary, and Philip Kothe. Marketing: An Introduction. 5th ed. Upper

Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.