206
GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect the population of medical practitioners by ethnicity, region, registration status, age and gender, based on figures provided by the GMC. ComRes is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules. All press releases or other publications must be checked with ComRes before use. ComRes requires 48 hours to check a press release unless otherwise agreed. For information about commissioning research please contact [email protected] or call +44 (0)20 7871 8660. To register for Pollwatch, featuring commentary and insight from the ComRes team, please email: pollwatch@comresglobal.com REPUTATION | COMMUNICATIONS | PUBLIC POLICY Four Millbank | London | SW1P 3JA | T. +44 (0)20 7871 8660 Rond-Point Schuman / Schumanplein 6 | Box 5 | 1040 Bruxelles | T. +32 (0)2 234 63 82 51/F Raffles City | No.268 Xi Zang Middle Road | HuangPu District Shanghai | 200001 China | T. +86 (0)21 2312 7674

GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS

Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were

weighted to reflect the population of medical practitioners by ethnicity, region, registration status, age and gender,

based on figures provided by the GMC. ComRes is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules.

All press releases or other publications must be checked with ComRes before use. ComRes requires 48 hours to

check a press release unless otherwise agreed.

For information about commissioning research please contact [email protected] or call +44 (0)20 7871 8660.

To register for Pollwatch, featuring commentary and insight from the ComRes team, please email: [email protected]

REPUTATION | COMMUNICATIONS | PUBLIC POLICY

Four Millbank | London | SW1P 3JA | T. +44 (0)20 7871 8660

Rond-Point Schuman / Schumanplein 6 | Box 5 | 1040 Bruxelles | T. +32 (0)2 234 63 82

51/F Raffles City | No.268 Xi Zang Middle Road | HuangPu District Shanghai | 200001 China | T. +86 (0)21 2312 7674

Page 2: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - Doctors

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016Prepared by ComRes Ltd

A1. Whilst the following duties of a doctor are all important, in your opinion which of these are the most important? ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1Base: All Doctors

A2. Overall, how confident, if at all, are you personally in the medical profession in the UK? ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3Base: All Doctors

A3. How confident, if at all, are you in the way that doctors are regulated by the General Medical Council (GMC)? ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4Base: All Doctors

A4. Why do you say that you are not confident in the way that doctors are regulated by the GMC? ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5Base: All who are not confident in the way that doctors are regulated by the GMC

B1. Which of the following roles and responsibilities do you associate with the GMC? .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8Base: All Doctors

B4_SUM. Listed in the table below are the four organisational values which underpin the work of the GMC. based on your experiences, how strongly do you agree or disagree that the GMCmeets each of these values? SUMMARY TABLE ....................................................................... 11Base: All Doctors

B4_1. Listed in the table below are the four organisational values which underpin the work of the GMC. Based on your experiences, how strongly do you agree or disagree that the GMC meets each of these values? Excellence – the GMC is committed to excellence in everything thatit does ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12Base: All Doctors

B4_2. Listed in the table below are the four organisational values which underpin the work of the GMC. Based on your experiences, how strongly do you agree or disagree that theGMC meets each of these values? Fairness – the GMC treats everyone fairly ......................................... 13Base: All Doctors

B4_3. Listed in the table below are the four organisational values which underpin the work of the GMC. Based on your experiences, how strongly do you agree or disagree that theGMC meets each of these values? Transparency – the GMC is honest, open and transparent ............... 14Base: All Doctors

B4_4. Listed in the table below are the four organisational values which underpin the work of the GMC. Based on your experiences, how strongly do you agree or disagree that theGMC meets each of these values? Collaboration – the GMC is a listening and learning organisation ...... 15Base: All Doctors

C1_SUM. Thinking about the process of registering. how far would you agree or disagree that... SUMMARY TABLE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 16Base: All doctors apllicable to answer

C1_1. Thinking about the process of registering. How far would you agree or disagree that... The process of registering for the List of Registered Medical Practitioners was fair to you personally ............................................................................................................................................... 17Base: All doctors

C1_2. Thinking about the process of registering. How far would you agree or disagree that... The process of registering for the GP Register was fair to you personally ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 19Base: All doctors on the GP Register

C1_3. Thinking about the process of registering. How far would you agree or disagree that... The process of registering for the Specialist Register was fair to you personally ............................................................................................................................................................................... 20Base: All doctors on the Specialist Register

C2_SUM. And thinking more widely, how fair, if at all, do you think the following registration process is/processes are? SUMMARY TABLE .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21Base: All doctors apllicable to answer

C2_1. And thinking more widely, how fair, if at all, do you think the following registration process is/processes are? The process of registering for the List of Registered Medical Practitioners (general registration) ................................................................................................................... 22Base: All doctors

C2_2. And thinking more widely, how fair, if at all, do you think the following registration process is/processes are? The process of registering for the GP Register ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23Base: All doctors on the GP Register

C2_3. And thinking more widely, how fair, if at all, do you think the following registration process is/processes are? The process of registering for the Specialist Register ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 24Base: All doctors on the Specialist Register

D1_SUM. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas... SUMMARY TABLE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 25Base: All Doctors

D1_1. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas... Being prepared for practice overall ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 26Base: All Doctors

D1_2. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas... Listening to and communicating well with patients .............................................................................................................................................................. 27Base: All Doctors

D1_3. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas... Clinical knowledge ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28Base: All Doctors

Page 3: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - Doctors

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016Prepared by ComRes Ltd

D1_4. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas... Clinical reasoning and making a diagnosis ......................................................................................................................................................................... 29Base: All Doctors

D1_5. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas... Clinical procedure and skills ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 30Base: All Doctors

D1_6. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas... Team work and interpersonal skills ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 31Base: All Doctors

D1_7. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas... Administrative tasks ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 32Base: All Doctors

D1_8. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas... Emotional resilience - being able to manage their emotions well and respond compassionately to others ........................................................................ 33Base: All Doctors

D1_9. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas... Physical demands e.g. hours worked and impact on their own health ................................................................................................................................ 34Base: All Doctors

D2. How far do you agree or disagree that your undergraduate training adequately prepared you for your first foundation post? ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35Base: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

D5_SUM. Thinking about your medical education and training, how far would you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? SUMMARY TABLE .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36Base: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

D5_1. Thinking about your medical education and training, how far would you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? The assessment process for your primary medical qualification was fair to you personally ............................................................................................ 37Base: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

D5_2. Thinking about your medical education and training, how far would you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? The assessment process for the foundation programme was fair to you personally ....................................................................................................... 38Base: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

D6. Thinking more widely, would you say that the assessment process for a primary medical qualification is: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39Base: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

D7. And would you say that the assessment process for a foundation programme is: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40Base: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

D8a. For how many years have you been on the UK GP register? ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 41Base: All doctors on the GP Register

D8b. For how many years have you been on the UK Specialist register? ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 42Base: All doctors on the Specialist Register

D9a. Did you undertake either your speciality training or GP training in the UK? UK GP register ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43Base: All doctors who registered on the GP Register in the last 5 years

D9b. Did you undertake either your speciality training or GP training in the UK? UK Specialist register ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44Base: All doctors who registered on the Specialist Register in the last 5 years

D11_SUM. Thinking about speciality training how far would you agree or disagree that: SUMMARY TABLE ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45Base: All doctors who registered on the Specialist Register in the last 5 years and undertook some or all of their speciality training in the UK

D11_1. Thinking about speciality training how far would you agree or disagree that: The assessment process for it was fair to you personally ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 46Base: All doctors who registered on the Specialist Register in the last 5 years and undertook some or all of their speciality training in the UK

D11_2. Thinking about speciality training how far would you agree or disagree that: The assessment process for it is fair to all those who go through the process ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 47Base: All doctors who registered on the Specialist Register in the last 5 years and undertook some or all of their speciality training in the UK

E1. Revalidation is the process by which licensed doctors are required to demonstrate that they are up to date and fit to practise, by participating in annual appraisals and collectingand reflecting on supporting information. Which of the following applies to you? ..................................... 48Base: All doctors

E3_SUM. And drawing on your interaction with the GMC, as part of revalidation, how much would you agree or disagree that. SUMMARY TABLE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49Base: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

E3_1. And drawing on your interaction with the GMC, as part of revalidation, how much would you agree or disagree that. You were/ have been treated fairly by the GMC ................................................................................................................................................................................... 50Base: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

E3_2. And drawing on your interaction with the GMC, as part of revalidation, how much would you agree or disagree that. You received/ So far you have received sufficient information from the GMC about the process (e.g. how it would work, what supporting information would berequired) ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 51Base: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

Page 4: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - Doctors

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016Prepared by ComRes Ltd

E3_3. And drawing on your interaction with the GMC, as part of revalidation, how much would you agree or disagree that. Any concerns you had were/ So far any of your concerns have been addressed by information you received from the GMC ........................................................... 52Base: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

E4_SUM. Below is a list of statements about your practice. for each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago. SUMMARY TABLE ......................................................................................................................... 53Base: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

E4_1. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago. You are collecting information about your practice .............................................................................. 54Base: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

E4_2. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago. You are reflecting on your practice ...................................................................................................... 55Base: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

E4_3. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago. You are aware how to apply the principles of good medical practice to your work ............................. 56Base: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

E4_4. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago. You feel a part of a governed structure that supports your professional development ........................ 57Base: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

E4_SUM. Below is a list of statements about your practice. for each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago. SUMMARY TABLE ......................................................................................................................... 58Base: All doctors who have been revalidated

E4_1. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago. You are collecting information about your practice .............................................................................. 59Base: All doctors who have been revalidated

E4_2. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago. You are reflecting on your practice ...................................................................................................... 60Base: All doctors who have been revalidated

E4_3. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago. You are aware how to apply the principles of good medical practice to your work ............................. 61Base: All doctors who have been revalidated

E4_4. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago. You feel a part of a governed structure that supports your professional development ........................ 62Base: All doctors who have been revalidated

E5. You said that you are now collecting information about your practice more than you were 12 months ago. How helpful, if at all, would you say that this is in improving the qualityof your professional practice? .................................................................................................................... 63Base: All doctors who say that they are now collecting more information about their practice than 12 months ago

E6. Do you feel you were already reflecting enough on your practice 12 months ago? ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 64Base: All doctors who say that they are reflecting on their practice the same amount as 12 months ago

E7_SUM. To what extent, if at all, would you say that the process of revalidation has had an impact on each of the following? SUMMARY TABLE .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 65Base: All doctors who have been revalidated

E7_1. To what extent, if at all, would you say that the process of revalidation has had an impact on each of the following? The amount of information you collect about your practice ................................................................................................................................................................... 66Base: All doctors who have been revalidated

E7_2. To what extent, if at all, would you say that the process of revalidation has had an impact on each of the following? How much time you spend reflecting on your practice .......................................................................................................................................................................... 67Base: All doctors who have been revalidated

E7_3. To what extent, if at all, would you say that the process of revalidation has had an impact on each of the following? Your awareness of how to apply the principles of good medical practice to your work ........................................................................................................................ 68Base: All doctors who have been revalidated

E7_4. To what extent, if at all, would you say that the process of revalidation has had an impact on each of the following? The extent to which you feel a part of a governed structure that supports your professional development .......................................................................................... 69Base: All doctors who have been revalidated

E8_SUM. To what extent, if at all, would you say that having an annual appraisal has had an impact on each of the following? SUMMARY TABLE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 70Base: All doctors who have annual appraisals

E8_1. To what extent, if at all, would you say that having an annual appraisal has had an impact on each of the following? The amount of information you collect about your practice .................................................................................................................................................................. 71Base: All doctors who have annual appraisals

E8_2. To what extent, if at all, would you say that having an annual appraisal has had an impact on each of the following? How much time you spend reflecting on your practice ......................................................................................................................................................................... 72Base: All doctors who have annual appraisals

E8_3. To what extent, if at all, would you say that having an annual appraisal has had an impact on each of the following? Your awareness of how to apply the principles of good medical practice to your work ....................................................................................................................... 73Base: All doctors who have annual appraisals

E8_4. To what extent, if at all, would you say that having an annual appraisal has had an impact on each of the following? The extent to which you feel a part of a governed structure that supports your professional development ......................................................................................... 74Base: All doctors who have annual appraisals

Page 5: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - Doctors

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016Prepared by ComRes Ltd

F1. If a situation arose in which you believed that patient safety or care was being compromised by the practice of a colleague, which of the following would you go to / tell, if any? ..................................................................................................................................................................... 75Base: All Doctors

F2. In the last 12 months has a situation arisen in which you believed that patient safety or care was being compromised by a doctor's practice? This could be about the doctor'sclinical skills, behaviours or health issues ...................................................................................................... 77Base: All Doctors

F3. And in the last 12 months, have you raised any of your concerns about patient safety or care being compromised with any of the following? ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 78Base: All doctors who have been concerned about patient safety or care being compromised in the last 12 months

F4. Why did you not raise these concerns with a colleague or an external organisation? ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 80Base: All doctors who did not raise their concerns about patient safety or care being compromised

G1. This question is about the GMC's Fitness to Practise investigations. By this we mean the Fitness to Practise investigation that the GMC conducts into complaints made about doctors. This includes processes such as reviewing any documentary evidence, collecting witnessstatements, and obtaining reports from experts in clinical matters. This process does not include the tribunal hearing (if required). This is covered in the next question. How confident, if at all, are you that the GMC's Fitness to Practise investigations produce fair outcomes for all groupsof doctors? Would you say you are. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 81Base: All doctors

G2. If the GMC concludes that a hearing is necessary it then refers the case to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) for a Fitness to Practise tribunal hearing to be conducted. At these hearings a panel of medical and non-medical people hear evidence and decide whethera doctor's fitness to practise is impaired. How confident, if at all, are you that the Fitness to Practise tribunal hearings run by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) produce fair outcomes? .................................................................................................................................... 82Base: All doctors

H1. Where would you go for advice or support on ethical and professional guidance relating to your practice? ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 83Base: All doctors

H2_SUM. Please rank the following in terms of which you see as being the most important source of advice or support on ethical and professional guidance relating to your practice RANKED 1ST SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 85Base: All doctors

H3_SUM. Over the past 12 months have you... SUMMARY TABLE ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 87Base: All Doctors

H3_SUM. Over the past 12 months have you... YES SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 88Base: All Doctors

H3_1. Over the past 12 months have you... Referred to GMC guidance (for example, Good Medical Practice, Consent, Confidentiality and other guidance) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 89Base: All Doctors

H3_2. Over the past 12 months have you... Used the GMC Confidential Helpline to raise concerns about local standards of practice ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 90Base: All Doctors

H3_3. Over the past 12 months have you... Spoken to the GMC expert advice team to ask questions about ethical practice ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 91Base: All Doctors

H3_4. Over the past 12 months have you... Used the GMC Standards enquiry service to get written advice on ethical issues ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 92Base: All Doctors

H3_5. Over the past 12 months have you... Used GMC online learning materials for example 'Good Medical Practice in Action' interactive case studies ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 93Base: All Doctors

H3_6. Over the past 12 months have you... Attended a learning session run by the GMC to promote awareness and understanding of its guidance ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 94Base: All Doctors

H3A_SUM. To what extent, if at all... SUMMARY TABLE ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 95Base: All who have used each form of ethical and professional guidance

H3A_1. To what extent, if at all, was the GMC guidance helpful? Would you say... .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 96Base: All who have Referred to GMC guidance (for example, Good Medical Practice, Consent, Confidentiality and other guidance)

H3A_2. To what extent, if at all, was the advice you obtained from the GMC Confidential Helpline helpful? Would you say... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 97Base: All who have Used the GMC Confidential Helpline to raise concerns about local standards of practice

H3A_3. To what extent, if at all, was the response you received from the GMC expert advice team helpful? Would you say... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 98Base: All who have Spoken to the GMC expert advice team to ask questions about ethical practice

H3A_4. To what extent, if at all, was the written advice you obtained from the GMC's Standards enquiry service helpful? Would you say... ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 99Base: All who have Used the GMC Standards enquiry service to get written advice on ethical issues

H3A_5. To what extent, if at all, were the GMC online learning materials you used helpful? Would you say... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 100Base: All who have Used GMC online learning materials for example 'Good Medical Practice in Action' interactive case studies

Page 6: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - Doctors

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016Prepared by ComRes Ltd

H3A_6. To what extent, if at all, was the GMC learning session you attended helpful? Would you say... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 101Base: All who have Attended a learning session run by the GMC to promote awareness and understanding of its guidance

H4. Which of the following types of support on ethical questions and dilemmas that arise in your work would you like the GMC to provide? .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 102Base: All Doctors

H5_SUM. Please rank the list of types of support on ethical questions and dilemmas that arise in your work that you would like the GMC to provide with 1 being the most importantfor the GMC to provide to the least important for the GMC to provide. RANKED 1ST SUMMARY ........... 105Base: All Doctors

H6. Which ethical challenges, if any, do you feel you are facing within your practice currently? .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 107Base: All Doctors

I1. Over the past 12 months have you had direct contact with the GMC? ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 111Base: All Doctors

I2. Thinking about the level of communication that you have had with the GMC over the last 12 months, would you say that you have received too much, too little or about theright amount of communication from the GMC? ................................................................................................. 112Base: Alldoctors who have had direct contact with the GMC in the last 12 months

I3. Through which, if any, of the following channels have you come into contact with the GMC over the past 12 months? ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 113Base: Alldoctors who have had direct contact with the GMC in the last 12 months

I4_1_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did GMC Online... SUMMARY TABLE ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 115Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through GMC Online in the last 12 months

I4_1_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC Online... address your need / answer your query? .................................................................................................................................................................... 116Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through GMC Online in the last 12 months

I4_1_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC Online... provide relevant information? ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 117Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through GMC Online in the last 12 months

I4_2_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC's telephone contact centre... SUMMARY TABLE ................................................................................................................................................................ 118Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's telephone contact centre in the last 12 months

I4_2_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC's telephone contact centre... address your need / answer your query? ............................................................................................................................... 119Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's telephone contact centre in the last 12 months

I4_2_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC's telephone contact centre... provide relevant information? ................................................................................................................................................. 120Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's telephone contact centre in the last 12 months

I4_3_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the letter from the GMC... SUMMARY TABLE .................................................................................................................................................................................... 121Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the letter from the GMC in the last 12 months

I4_3_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the letter from the GMC... address your need / answer your query? ................................................................................................................................................... 122Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the letter from the GMC in the last 12 months

I4_3_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the letter from the GMC... provide relevant information? ..................................................................................................................................................................... 123Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the letter from the GMC in the last 12 months

I4_4_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the 'GMC News' newsletter... SUMMARY TABLE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 124Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News' newsletter in the last 12 months

I4_4_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the 'GMC News' newsletter... address your need / answer your query? ............................................................................................................................................. 125Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News' newsletter in the last 12 months

I4_4_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the 'GMC News' newsletter... provide relevant information? ............................................................................................................................................................... 126Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News' newsletter in the last 12 months

I4_5_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter... SUMMARY TABLE ............................................................................................................................................................. 127Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter in the last 12 months

I4_5_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter... address your need / answer your query? ........................................................................................................................... 128Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter in the last 12 months

I4_5_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter... provide relevant information? ............................................................................................................................................. 129Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter in the last 12 months

I4_6_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did 'Hot Topics'... SUMMARY TABLE ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 130Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through 'Hot Topics' in the last 12 months

Page 7: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - Doctors

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016Prepared by ComRes Ltd

I4_6_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the 'Hot Topics'... address your need / answer your query? ...................................................................................................................................................................... 131Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through 'Hot Topics' in the last 12 months

I4_6_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the 'Hot Topics'... provide relevant information? ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 132Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through 'Hot Topics' in the last 12 months

I4_8_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC Social media account(s)... SUMMARY TABLE .................................................................................................................................................................... 133Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC Social media account(s) in the last 12 months

I4_8_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC Social media account(s)... address your need / answer your query? .................................................................................................................................. 134Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC Social media account(s) in the last 12 months

I4_8_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC Social media account(s)... provide relevant information? .................................................................................................................................................... 135Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC Social media account(s) in the last 12 months

I4_9_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC event(s)... SUMMARY TABLE ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 136Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC event(s) in the last 12 months

I4_9_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC event(s)... address your need / answer your query? ............................................................................................................................................................ 137Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC event(s) in the last 12 months

I4_9_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC event(s)... provide relevant information? .............................................................................................................................................................................. 138Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC event(s) in the last 12 months

I4_10_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC's Regional Liaison Service... SUMMARY TABLE .............................................................................................................................................................. 139Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's Regional Liaison Service in the last 12 months

I4_10_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC's Regional Liaison Service... address your need / answer your query? ............................................................................................................................. 140Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's Regional Liaison Service in the last 12 months

I4_10_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC's Regional Liaison Service... provide relevant information? ............................................................................................................................................... 141Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's Regional Liaison Service in the last 12 months

I5_SUM. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding the GMC's communication with you? SUMMARY TABLE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 142Base: All doctors

I5_1. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding the GMC's communication with you? The GMC keeps me adequately informed of its work and priorities ........................................................................................................................................................ 143Base: All doctors

I5_2. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding the GMC's communication with you? GMC communications are always relevant to me ................................................................................................................................................................................... 144Base: All doctors

I5_3. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding the GMC's communication with you? GMC communications have an appropriate tone .................................................................................................................................................................................... 145Base: All doctors

I6. Overall, what one thing could the GMC do to improve its communication/ contact with you? ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 146Base: All Doctors

I8. Taking into account the GMC's engagement with you over the past 12 months, how much do you agree or disagree that it is focusing on the right issues as a regulator? ............................................................................................................................................................................... 150Base: All who have had contact with the GMC in the last 12 months

I9. Where do you think the GMC should be focusing more of its attention? .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 151Base: All doctors who have had direct contact with the GMC in the last 12 months and disagree that the GMC is focusing on the right issues as a regulator

I9. Where do you think the GMC should be focusing less of its attention? ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 153Base: All doctors who have had direct contact with the GMC in the last 12 months and disagree that the GMC is focusing on the right issues as a regulator

I10. If you have visited the GMC's website in the last 12 months, how frequently have you visited it? ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 155Base: All Doctors

I11_SUM. And in general how would you rate the GMC's website in terms of... SUMMARY TABLE ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 156Base: All who have used the GMC website in the last year

I11_1. And in general how would you rate the GMC's website in terms of... The relevance of information on the GMC website ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 157Base: All who have used the GMC website in the last year

I11_2. And in general how would you rate the GMC's website in terms of... The usefulness of information on the GMC website ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 158Base: All who have used the GMC website in the last year

Page 8: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - Doctors

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016Prepared by ComRes Ltd

I11_3. And in general how would you rate the GMC's website in terms of... The accessibility of the GMC's website .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 159Base: All who have used the GMC website in the last year

I12. Through which channels would you prefer to receive information from the GMC in future? .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 160Base: All Doctors

J1. What is your ethnic group? .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 162Base: All Doctors

J2. The Equality Act 2010 defines a person as disabled if they have a physical or mental impairment, which has a substantial and long-term (i.e. has lasted or is expected to last at least 12 months) and adverse effect on the person's ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. Doyou have a disability, long-term illness or health condition? .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 164Base: All Doctors

J3. What is your religion? ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 165Base: All Doctors

J4. Which of the following options best describes your sexual orientation? .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 166Base: All Doctors

S2. Which of the following best describes your current role? ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 167Base: All doctors

S3. Which of the following sectors, if any, do you work in currently? As a note, by 'the NHS' we are also referring to the Health and Social Care system in Northern Ireland. ............................................................................................................................................................................... 168Base: All doctors

S4. And what is the basis of your principal work role? .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 169Base: All doctors

S5. Are you... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 170Base: All Doctors

S6. And in terms of age are you... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 171Base: All Doctors

S8. In which of the following UK countries are you currently mainly working/studying ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 172Base: All doctors

Ethnicity from sample ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 173Base: All Doctors

Segment ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 174Base: All Doctors

Sample Type ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 175Base: All Doctors

Gender from sample .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 176Base: All Doctors

Year Qualified from sample ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 177Base: All Doctors

UK_NATION from sample ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 178Base: All Doctors

AGE_RANGE_CODED from sample .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 179Base: All Doctors

PMQ_REGION_CODE from sample ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 180Base: All Doctors

PLACE_OF_QUALIFICATION_CODE from sample ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 181Base: All Doctors

TRAINING_STATUS_CODED from sample ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 191Base: All Doctors

TRAINING_LEVEL_CODED from sample ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 192Base: All Doctors

Page 9: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - Doctors

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016Prepared by ComRes Ltd

RO_FLAG_CODED from sample .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 194Base: All Doctors

Training_level_2016_coded from sample .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 195Base: All Doctors

SAS_coded from sample ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 197Base: All Doctors

Page 10: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 1/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsA1. Whilst the following duties of a doctor are all important, in your opinion which of these are the most important?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Gives clinically appropriate treatment and advice 1979 610 1034 304 1169 603 191 435 626 1353 135 19 53 336 981 24786% 85% 86% 87% 89% 81% 83% 79% 80% 89% 83% 79% 87% 77% 90% 89%

E FGH m

Keeps their knowledge and skills up to date 1785 564 923 274 1028 577 175 420 595 1190 126 19 48 330 853 22877% 78% 77% 79% 78% 78% 76% 76% 76% 78% 77% 78% 79% 75% 78% 82%

Raises and acts on concerns about patient safety orquality of care 1379 465 720 176 779 457 118 335 453 927 82 13 33 267 664 176

60% 65% 60% 51% 59% 62% 51% 60% 58% 61% 50% 56% 53% 61% 61% 63%bC C F f F

Keeps patient confidentiality 1260 359 685 197 688 451 104 360 464 796 70 15 33 296 585 13955% 50% 57% 56% 52% 61% 45% 65% 59% 52% 43% 64% 53% 68% 54% 50%

A A D FHI FI F J L

Works well with colleagues 911 356 419 121 510 305 84 206 290 621 61 11 15 164 434 13040% 49% 35% 35% 39% 41% 36% 37% 37% 41% 37% 44% 25% 38% 40% 47%

BC h L N

Keeps accurate records 855 214 458 167 446 310 83 262 345 509 61 9 26 208 358 9337% 30% 38% 48% 34% 42% 36% 47% 44% 33% 38% 36% 43% 48% 33% 33%

A AB D FI FI

Teaches, trains or mentors more junior colleagues 699 276 329 80 405 219 70 144 214 485 53 4 18 111 334 10430% 38% 27% 23% 31% 30% 30% 26% 27% 32% 33% 17% 29% 25% 31% 37%

BC c GH k N

Actively seeks and responds to the views andpreferences of patients 688 209 362 110 417 212 58 169 227 461 43 7 19 140 355 65

30% 29% 30% 32% 32% 29% 25% 30% 29% 30% 26% 29% 31% 32% 33% 23%O

Contributes to quality improvement activities (forexample clinical audit, case reviews or redesign ofservices) 343 85 194 60 153 158 37 142 179 164 28 5 8 120 117 33

15% 12% 16% 17% 12% 21% 16% 26% 23% 11% 17% 19% 14% 28% 11% 12%A A D I FI FI L

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 1

Page 11: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 1/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsA1. Whilst the following duties of a doctor are all important, in your opinion which of these are the most important?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Has broad knowledge of medicine outside of theirspeciality 206 64 93 43 118 57 31 39 70 136 25 1 4 30 89 26

9% 9% 8% 12% 9% 8% 13% 7% 9% 9% 15% 2% 6% 7% 8% 9%aB GHI K

Don't know 14 6 7 1 8 3 2 5 7 7 1 * 2 2 5 *1% 1% 1% * 1% * 1% 1% 1% * 1% 2% 3% * * *

m

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 2

Page 12: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 2/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsA2. Overall, how confident, if at all, are you personally in the medical profession in the UK?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 866 226 486 142 502 264 82 222 304 563 57 9 27 172 418 8338% 31% 40% 41% 38% 36% 35% 40% 39% 37% 35% 36% 44% 39% 38% 30%

A A O

Fairly confident (3) 1249 432 623 172 703 422 128 297 424 825 93 12 29 242 582 16754% 60% 52% 49% 54% 57% 55% 54% 54% 54% 57% 51% 47% 55% 53% 60%

BC n

Not very confident (2) 142 46 70 25 81 42 17 27 44 98 11 2 5 16 65 246% 6% 6% 7% 6% 6% 7% 5% 6% 6% 7% 9% 8% 4% 6% 9%

Not at all confident (1) 30 10 14 6 17 8 1 3 4 26 - 1 - 3 17 41% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 2% - 4% - 1% 2% 2%

GH J

Don't know 18 7 8 4 12 4 4 4 8 10 2 - 1 4 9 *1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% *

NETS

Net: Confident 2116 659 1109 313 1205 686 209 519 728 1388 150 21 56 415 1000 25092% 91% 92% 90% 92% 93% 91% 94% 93% 91% 92% 87% 91% 95% 92% 90%

i

Net: Not confident 172 56 83 32 98 50 18 30 48 124 11 3 5 19 82 287% 8% 7% 9% 7% 7% 8% 6% 6% 8% 7% 13% 8% 4% 7% 10%

Gh

Mean score 3.29 3.23 3.33 3.30 3.30 3.28 3.28 3.34 3.32 3.27 3.28 3.20 3.37 3.35 3.30 3.18A a I i O

Standard deviation .64 .62 .64 .69 .64 .62 .61 .60 .60 .66 .59 .77 .63 .59 .65 .65Standard error .01 .02 .02 .03 .02 .02 .04 .02 .02 .02 .04 .13 .08 .03 .02 .04

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 3

Page 13: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 3/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsA3. How confident, if at all, are you in the way that doctors are regulated by the General Medical Council (GMC)?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 253 71 150 32 118 118 42 108 150 103 31 7 8 91 78 2011% 10% 12% 9% 9% 16% 18% 19% 19% 7% 19% 31% 14% 21% 7% 7%

ac D I I I

Fairly confident (3) 1067 341 548 164 612 376 111 301 413 654 83 10 29 249 499 11746% 47% 46% 47% 47% 51% 48% 54% 53% 43% 51% 40% 48% 57% 46% 42%

d fI I

Not very confident (2) 598 179 321 87 364 151 46 96 142 457 29 1 15 68 320 8326% 25% 27% 25% 28% 20% 20% 17% 18% 30% 18% 4% 24% 15% 29% 30%

E FGH k m

Not at all confident (1) 305 93 146 57 177 61 20 29 49 256 10 5 8 14 159 4213% 13% 12% 16% 13% 8% 9% 5% 6% 17% 6% 20% 13% 3% 15% 15%

B E g FGH J M

Don't know 83 38 35 8 44 34 11 19 31 52 10 1 1 16 34 174% 5% 3% 2% 3% 5% 5% 3% 4% 3% 6% 5% 1% 4% 3% 6%

BC N

NETS

Net: Confident 1320 412 698 196 730 494 154 409 563 757 115 17 38 340 577 13757% 57% 58% 56% 56% 67% 67% 74% 72% 50% 70% 71% 61% 78% 53% 49%

D I FI I L

Net: Not confident 903 272 467 144 541 213 65 125 191 712 39 6 23 82 479 12539% 38% 39% 41% 41% 29% 28% 23% 24% 47% 24% 25% 38% 19% 44% 45%

E g FGH M

Mean score 2.57 2.57 2.60 2.50 2.53 2.78 2.80 2.91 2.88 2.41 2.89 2.85 2.63 2.99 2.47 2.44C D I fI I L

Standard deviation .86 .85 .86 .88 .85 .82 .85 .77 .80 .85 .80 1.12 .89 .72 .84 .85Standard error .02 .03 .03 .04 .02 .03 .05 .03 .03 .02 .06 .20 .11 .03 .03 .05

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 4

Page 14: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 4/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsA4. Why do you say that you are not confident in the way that doctors are regulated by the GMC?Base: All who are not confident in the way that doctors are regulated by the GMC

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 850 219 449 163 506 215 76 140 216 634 47 8 26 92 433 115

Weighted Total 903 272 467 144 541 213 65 125 191 712 39 6 23 82 479 125100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

The GMC looks out for patients' interests, not thedoctor's 523 181 260 70 300 148 33 90 124 399 24 4 18 60 258 84

58% 66% 56% 49% 56% 69% 51% 72% 65% 56% 63% 70% 79% 73% 54% 67%BC D FI FI N

It's not clear what processes the GMC uses 407 138 201 60 240 104 30 48 78 329 21 4 3 36 216 6445% 51% 43% 42% 44% 49% 46% 39% 41% 46% 54% 70% 12% 44% 45% 51%

bc

Word-of-mouth/what someone else told me 255 88 130 34 149 66 11 35 46 209 6 1 4 26 138 3928% 32% 28% 23% 28% 31% 17% 28% 24% 29% 17% 25% 19% 31% 29% 31%

c f F

From professional experience 247 58 122 63 157 46 24 32 56 191 11 3 10 18 137 2527% 21% 26% 44% 29% 22% 37% 25% 29% 27% 27% 50% 43% 22% 29% 20%

AB E gi o

I don't trust or have confidence in regulator/authorities in general 216 65 106 42 123 51 17 25 42 174 10 2 4 17 108 32

24% 24% 23% 29% 23% 24% 25% 20% 22% 24% 25% 26% 19% 20% 23% 26%

From what I have read in the newspapers 178 51 98 23 100 48 11 30 40 137 7 - 3 24 90 2420% 19% 21% 16% 18% 22% 16% 24% 21% 19% 18% - 12% 29% 19% 19%

From personal/family experience 129 42 55 31 76 32 9 23 32 96 4 3 3 15 70 1414% 15% 12% 22% 14% 15% 14% 18% 17% 14% 10% 50% 12% 18% 15% 11%

B

From what I have seen/ heard on TV/radio 123 42 62 16 82 29 9 21 30 93 7 1 4 15 71 1414% 15% 13% 11% 15% 14% 13% 17% 16% 13% 19% 9% 16% 18% 15% 11%

Over regulation/ Bureaucratic/ Aggressive 52 12 25 10 29 8 6 3 9 43 1 - 1 2 27 66% 4% 5% 7% 5% 4% 10% 2% 5% 6% 4% - 4% 2% 6% 5%

G g

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 5

Page 15: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 4/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsA4. Why do you say that you are not confident in the way that doctors are regulated by the GMC?Base: All who are not confident in the way that doctors are regulated by the GMC

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 850 219 449 163 506 215 76 140 216 634 47 8 26 92 433 115

Weighted Total 903 272 467 144 541 213 65 125 191 712 39 6 23 82 479 125100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

GMC approaches doctors as possible offenders/Doesn't work in collaboration with doctors as equals/Chris Day's case/ Punitive 50 17 22 9 32 7 4 6 10 40 3 1 2 4 27 3

6% 6% 5% 7% 6% 3% 6% 5% 5% 6% 8% 9% 9% 5% 6% 2%

Stress caused/ Suicides 46 18 25 4 31 7 2 4 6 41 * - 1 3 29 55% 6% 5% 3% 6% 3% 3% 3% 3% 6% 1% - 6% 3% 6% 4%

c

Cannot conduct investigations in timely and fairmanner 37 11 19 7 26 2 - 2 2 34 - - 1 1 26 2

4% 4% 4% 5% 5% 1% - 2% 1% 5% - - 2% 1% 5% 1%E fH o

I don't have trust/ confidence in GMC 35 8 18 6 24 3 1 5 6 29 1 - 3 1 21 24% 3% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 4% 3% 4% 2% - 12% 1% 4% 1%

E

Experience of colleague/ close acquaintance 21 4 13 4 16 1 3 1 4 17 1 * 1 - 15 *2% 1% 3% 3% 3% * 5% 1% 2% 2% 3% 8% 3% - 3% *

E G

Self serving 18 7 10 1 13 2 1 1 2 16 1 - - - 12 22% 3% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% - - - 3% 2%

Funded by doctors 16 13 2 1 7 5 - 1 1 15 - - - 1 7 32% 5% * 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 2% - - - 1% 2% 3%

BC

From cases and what I have read on MPTS site/Reports in Medical Journals 16 6 9 1 8 4 - 1 1 15 - - - 1 8 3

2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 2% - - - 1% 2% 3%

Racial Bias 14 2 9 3 5 5 1 7 8 5 - * 1 4 5 -2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 6% 4% 1% - 7% 2% 5% 1% -

I I

Conflict of interest for Doctors 12 9 2 1 4 4 - 1 1 11 - - - 1 4 31% 3% * 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 2% - - - 1% 1% 3%

Bc

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 6

Page 16: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 4/3

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsA4. Why do you say that you are not confident in the way that doctors are regulated by the GMC?Base: All who are not confident in the way that doctors are regulated by the GMC

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 850 219 449 163 506 215 76 140 216 634 47 8 26 92 433 115

Weighted Total 903 272 467 144 541 213 65 125 191 712 39 6 23 82 479 125100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

No Whistleblower protection 12 7 4 1 4 3 * 2 2 10 * - - 1 3 21% 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 2%

B

Appraisal process/ revalidation not fit for purpose 5 1 3 1 5 - - - - 5 - - - - 5 -1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - - - 1% - - - - 1% -

Government mouthpiece/ Need to be independent 5 2 1 - 4 - 1 - 1 4 - - - - 4 -1% 1% * - 1% - 2% - 1% * - - - - 1% -

gi

Junior Doctor's contract 4 2 2 1 2 1 - 1 1 3 - - - - 2 1* 1% * * * * - 1% 1% * - - - - * *

The GMC looks out for doctors' interests, not thepatient's 4 - 3 1 2 - 1 - 1 3 1 - - - 1 -

* - 1% * * - 1% - * * 2% - - - * -

Other 3 - 1 2 2 - - - - 3 - - - - 2 -* - * 2% * - - - - * - - - - * -

aB

Would rather not say 13 3 9 1 6 3 1 4 5 8 1 - 2 1 3 21% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% - 10% 1% 1% 2%

i

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 7

Page 17: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 5/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsB1. Which of the following roles and responsibilities do you associate with the GMC?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Investigates and acts on concerns about doctors(Correct) 2058 643 1074 311 1196 645 186 469 654 1404 128 21 55 371 1013 253

89% 89% 89% 89% 91% 87% 80% 85% 83% 92% 78% 89% 90% 85% 93% 91%E FGH

Determines who can practice medicine in the UK(Correct) 1926 591 1011 298 1132 590 202 463 666 1260 142 22 52 367 938 201

84% 82% 84% 86% 86% 80% 88% 84% 85% 83% 87% 93% 85% 84% 86% 72%E I O

Provides ethical and professional guidance for themedical profession (Correct) 1653 474 892 265 949 545 161 429 590 1063 118 16 47 344 784 186

72% 66% 74% 76% 72% 74% 70% 78% 75% 70% 72% 65% 77% 79% 72% 67%A A FI fI o

Helps patients to raise concerns about doctors'practise (Correct) 1624 496 857 249 973 488 159 371 530 1094 111 21 44 291 818 177

70% 69% 71% 72% 74% 66% 69% 67% 68% 72% 68% 85% 72% 66% 75% 64%E GH J O

Sets the standards for medical practise in the UK(Correct) 1514 426 827 237 842 520 166 431 596 918 115 18 45 349 682 154

66% 59% 69% 68% 64% 70% 72% 78% 76% 60% 70% 73% 74% 80% 63% 55%A A D I fI I O

Sets the standards for medical education andtraining in the UK (Correct) 999 314 498 176 565 336 104 276 379 620 77 13 27 220 461 103

43% 43% 41% 50% 43% 45% 45% 50% 48% 41% 47% 53% 44% 50% 42% 37%AB I I

Makes sure doctors keep their knowledge and skillsup to date (Correct) 987 271 540 167 518 383 122 355 477 510 84 18 38 287 396 79

43% 38% 45% 48% 39% 52% 53% 64% 61% 34% 51% 75% 62% 66% 36% 28%A A D I FI FI J O

Helps doctors to raise concerns about patient safety(Correct) 727 201 400 113 371 302 97 278 374 352 71 11 30 229 269 61

32% 28% 33% 33% 28% 41% 42% 50% 48% 23% 44% 45% 50% 52% 25% 22%A D I FI fI

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 8

Page 18: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 5/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsB1. Which of the following roles and responsibilities do you associate with the GMC?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Campaigns on issues that are important to patients(Incorrect) 559 178 299 76 248 259 80 216 296 263 59 12 21 174 168 72

24% 25% 25% 22% 19% 35% 35% 39% 38% 17% 36% 50% 35% 40% 15% 26%D I I I N

Serves as an independent membership body fordoctors (Incorrect) 559 195 300 52 256 257 77 227 304 256 55 10 17 188 185 59

24% 27% 25% 15% 20% 35% 33% 41% 39% 17% 34% 42% 27% 43% 17% 21%C C D I FI I L

Campaigns on issues that are important to doctors(Incorrect) 299 82 174 39 119 156 62 140 202 97 43 13 12 115 64 29

13% 11% 14% 11% 9% 21% 27% 25% 26% 6% 26% 53% 20% 26% 6% 10%a D I I I J N

Harassing and controlling doctors (Other) 14 7 6 1 5 5 1 3 4 10 * * - 3 4 21% 1% * * * 1% * * * 1% * 2% - 1% * 1%

Prosecution of doctors (Other) 13 7 4 2 7 4 - 1 1 12 - - - 1 7 31% 1% * * 1% 1% - * * 1% - - - * 1% 1%

gH

Controlled by government (Other) 12 5 3 3 7 3 - 1 1 11 - - 1 - 6 31% 1% * 1% 1% * - * * 1% - - 1% - 1% 1%

b H M

Charging hefty fees from doctors (Other) 8 4 3 1 4 4 1 1 2 7 1 - - 1 3 3* 1% * * * 1% * * * * 1% - - * * 1%

Does not provide whistleblowing protection (Other) 8 4 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 6 * * - 1 2 -* 1% * * * * * * * * * 2% - * * -

Undermine the profession/ demean and cow theprofession (Other) 6 1 5 1 2 4 * 3 3 3 * - 1 2 1 2

* * * * * 1% * 1% * * * - 1% 1% * 1%d N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 9

Page 19: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 5/3

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsB1. Which of the following roles and responsibilities do you associate with the GMC?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Should provide all of these (Other) 4 - 2 2 3 - * - * 3 * - - - 3 -* - * 1% * - * - * * * - - - * -

Ab

Disciplines doctors (Other) 4 4 - - 2 2 1 - 1 3 1 - - - 1 2* * - - * * * - * * * - - - * 1%

B

Other 7 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 6 - 1 1 - 1 -* * * 1% * * * * * * - 3% 1% - * -

b J M

None of the above 18 4 9 3 7 7 - 9 9 8 - - 1 7 6 -1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% - - 2% 2% 1% -

FI fi

Don't know 10 3 3 2 2 4 1 5 6 3 1 - - 3 1 1* * * 1% * 1% * 1% 1% * * - - 1% * *

d I I

NETS

Net: At least one correct 2259 707 1177 342 1297 720 228 532 760 1499 161 23 58 423 1078 27498% 98% 98% 98% 99% 97% 99% 96% 97% 99% 99% 96% 95% 97% 99% 98%

E G GH

Net: At least 3 correct 2048 624 1078 316 1192 649 208 497 705 1342 149 23 54 400 989 22689% 87% 90% 91% 91% 88% 90% 90% 90% 88% 91% 96% 89% 91% 91% 81%

A A E O

Net: All correct 254 65 144 42 130 107 34 114 148 105 25 6 16 88 89 1411% 9% 12% 12% 10% 14% 15% 21% 19% 7% 15% 23% 26% 20% 8% 5%

a D I FI I o

Net: None correct 47 14 23 6 18 20 3 21 24 22 2 1 3 14 12 52% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 4% 3% 1% 1% 4% 5% 3% 1% 2%

D FI I

Net: At least one incorrect 952 324 508 103 450 420 129 345 474 478 95 17 32 282 323 12041% 45% 42% 30% 34% 57% 56% 62% 60% 31% 58% 72% 53% 65% 30% 43%

C C D I fI I l N

Net: None incorrect 1354 397 693 245 864 320 101 209 310 1044 68 7 29 155 767 15959% 55% 58% 70% 66% 43% 44% 38% 40% 69% 42% 28% 47% 35% 70% 57%

AB E g FGH m O

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 10

Page 20: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 6/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsB4_SUM. Listed in the table below are the four organisational values which underpin the work of the GMC. based on your experiences, how strongly do you agree or disagree that the GMCmeets each of these values?

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All Doctors

NETS

Total Strongly agree Tend to agreeNeither agree nor

disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Agree Disagree Mean

Excellence – the GMC is committed to excellence ineverything that it does 2306 282 819 719 248 138 100 1101 386 3.39

100% 12% 36% 31% 11% 6% 4% 48% 17%

Transparency – the GMC is honest, open and transparent 2306 271 658 613 416 226 121 929 643 3.15100% 12% 29% 27% 18% 10% 5% 40% 28%

Fairness – the GMC treats everyone fairly 2306 251 651 565 463 265 111 902 728 3.07100% 11% 28% 25% 20% 11% 5% 39% 32%

Collaboration – the GMC is a listening and learningorganisation 2306 175 523 680 482 300 147 698 781 2.90

100% 8% 23% 29% 21% 13% 6% 30% 34%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 11

Page 21: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 7/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsB4_1. Listed in the table below are the four organisational values which underpin the work of the GMC. Based on your experiences, how strongly do you agree or disagree that theGMC meets each of these values?

Excellence – the GMC is committed to excellence in everything that it doesBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 282 78 166 35 128 134 44 134 178 104 34 5 15 109 79 2012% 11% 14% 10% 10% 18% 19% 24% 23% 7% 21% 20% 24% 25% 7% 7%

aC D I I I

Tend to agree (4) 819 265 413 128 465 290 85 238 323 496 64 9 25 197 376 8436% 37% 34% 37% 35% 39% 37% 43% 41% 33% 39% 37% 41% 45% 35% 30%

d fI I

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 719 223 382 104 432 202 59 122 181 538 40 4 11 90 380 10731% 31% 32% 30% 33% 27% 25% 22% 23% 35% 25% 19% 18% 21% 35% 39%

E FGH

Tend to disagree (2) 248 73 127 46 164 56 18 29 47 201 12 5 3 22 149 3011% 10% 11% 13% 12% 8% 8% 5% 6% 13% 7% 21% 5% 5% 14% 11%

E FGH J

Strongly disagree (1) 138 43 68 20 70 28 12 13 25 113 5 1 6 5 60 226% 6% 6% 6% 5% 4% 5% 2% 3% 7% 3% 4% 9% 1% 5% 8%

G GH M

Don't know 100 39 45 15 55 30 12 17 29 71 8 - 1 14 45 164% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 3% 4% 5% 5% - 2% 3% 4% 6%

b

NETS

Net: Agree 1101 343 579 164 593 424 130 372 501 600 98 14 40 306 456 10448% 48% 48% 47% 45% 57% 56% 67% 64% 39% 60% 57% 65% 70% 42% 37%

D I FI FI

Net: Disagree 386 115 195 66 234 84 30 42 72 314 17 6 9 27 209 5117% 16% 16% 19% 18% 11% 13% 8% 9% 21% 10% 25% 14% 6% 19% 18%

E Gh FGH J M

Mean score 3.39 3.39 3.42 3.34 3.33 3.63 3.60 3.84 3.77 3.19 3.71 3.48 3.67 3.90 3.25 3.19D I FI FI l

Standard deviation 1.05 1.03 1.05 1.04 1.01 1.00 1.07 .94 .99 1.02 1.00 1.17 1.19 .89 .99 1.02Standard error .02 .04 .03 .05 .03 .04 .07 .04 .03 .03 .07 .20 .14 .04 .03 .06

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 12

Page 22: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 8/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsB4_2. Listed in the table below are the four organisational values which underpin the work of the GMC. Based on your experiences, how strongly do you agree or disagree that theGMC meets each of these values?

Fairness – the GMC treats everyone fairlyBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 251 82 136 28 121 113 49 112 161 90 37 7 9 94 75 1211% 11% 11% 8% 9% 15% 21% 20% 20% 6% 23% 29% 15% 21% 7% 4%

c C D I I I

Tend to agree (4) 651 204 338 100 379 229 66 187 252 398 50 8 19 157 310 6428% 28% 28% 29% 29% 31% 29% 34% 32% 26% 31% 31% 31% 36% 28% 23%

I I o

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 565 180 302 78 315 181 55 119 175 391 37 4 11 97 268 8025% 25% 25% 22% 24% 24% 24% 22% 22% 26% 22% 15% 18% 22% 25% 29%

Gh

Tend to disagree (2) 463 139 231 83 291 118 27 65 92 371 20 3 7 44 264 7120% 19% 19% 24% 22% 16% 12% 12% 12% 24% 12% 12% 12% 10% 24% 25%

aB E FGH

Strongly disagree (1) 265 75 135 47 144 68 21 43 64 201 11 2 10 26 122 4011% 10% 11% 13% 11% 9% 9% 8% 8% 13% 7% 8% 17% 6% 11% 14%

fGH M

Don't know 111 40 58 12 64 32 13 28 40 71 8 1 5 20 51 115% 6% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 7% 5% 5% 4%

NETS

Net: Agree 902 286 475 128 500 342 115 298 413 489 87 15 28 250 385 7739% 40% 40% 37% 38% 46% 50% 54% 53% 32% 53% 60% 46% 57% 35% 28%

D I I I l O

Net: Disagree 728 215 366 130 435 186 48 108 156 572 31 5 18 70 386 11132% 30% 30% 37% 33% 25% 21% 20% 20% 38% 19% 20% 29% 16% 35% 40%

AB E FGH M

Mean score 3.07 3.12 3.10 2.94 3.03 3.28 3.44 3.49 3.48 2.87 3.53 3.64 3.17 3.59 2.95 2.77C C D I I I L O

Standard deviation 1.20 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.18 1.20 1.23 1.19 1.20 1.15 1.20 1.29 1.36 1.13 1.14 1.11Standard error .03 .05 .04 .06 .03 .04 .08 .05 .04 .03 .09 .23 .17 .05 .04 .07

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 13

Page 23: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 9/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsB4_3. Listed in the table below are the four organisational values which underpin the work of the GMC. Based on your experiences, how strongly do you agree or disagree that theGMC meets each of these values?

Transparency – the GMC is honest, open and transparentBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 271 89 145 31 130 122 54 128 181 90 39 9 14 103 76 912% 12% 12% 9% 10% 16% 23% 23% 23% 6% 24% 38% 23% 24% 7% 3%

c c D I I I j O

Tend to agree (4) 658 206 357 91 363 246 68 199 267 391 52 6 14 171 297 6929% 29% 30% 26% 28% 33% 29% 36% 34% 26% 32% 26% 24% 39% 27% 25%

D fI I L

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 613 179 322 103 353 181 57 116 174 439 39 2 11 88 303 9127% 25% 27% 30% 27% 24% 25% 21% 22% 29% 24% 9% 18% 20% 28% 32%

a GH k

Tend to disagree (2) 416 123 213 75 282 87 28 45 72 344 17 5 7 31 259 5218% 17% 18% 21% 21% 12% 12% 8% 9% 23% 10% 19% 11% 7% 24% 19%

ab E g FGH o

Strongly disagree (1) 226 80 98 38 117 62 13 36 49 178 7 1 8 21 102 4010% 11% 8% 11% 9% 8% 6% 6% 6% 12% 4% 6% 14% 5% 9% 14%

B b FGH M N

Don't know 121 44 65 10 69 42 11 30 42 80 10 1 6 23 53 185% 6% 5% 3% 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 6% 2% 10% 5% 5% 7%

C C m

NETS

Net: Agree 929 295 502 122 493 368 121 327 448 481 91 15 29 275 373 7840% 41% 42% 35% 37% 50% 53% 59% 57% 32% 56% 64% 47% 63% 34% 28%

c C D I fI I L o

Net: Disagree 643 203 311 113 399 150 40 80 121 522 23 6 15 52 360 9228% 28% 26% 32% 30% 20% 18% 14% 15% 34% 14% 25% 25% 12% 33% 33%

B E FGH M

Mean score 3.15 3.15 3.21 3.00 3.09 3.40 3.55 3.65 3.62 2.91 3.66 3.74 3.35 3.74 2.99 2.83c C D I I I L O

Standard deviation 1.17 1.21 1.15 1.15 1.14 1.17 1.16 1.14 1.15 1.12 1.11 1.34 1.39 1.07 1.11 1.09Standard error .03 .05 .03 .06 .03 .04 .07 .05 .04 .03 .08 .24 .18 .05 .04 .07

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 14

Page 24: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 10/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsB4_4. Listed in the table below are the four organisational values which underpin the work of the GMC. Based on your experiences, how strongly do you agree or disagree that theGMC meets each of these values?

Collaboration – the GMC is a listening and learning organisationBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 175 53 102 16 62 96 38 99 138 37 26 8 8 80 29 88% 7% 9% 5% 5% 13% 17% 18% 18% 2% 16% 32% 12% 18% 3% 3%

c C D I I I J

Tend to agree (4) 523 169 274 74 278 217 63 188 251 271 50 6 18 163 210 4723% 23% 23% 21% 21% 29% 27% 34% 32% 18% 31% 26% 29% 37% 19% 17%

D I fI I

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 680 191 368 111 412 198 66 133 199 481 50 4 14 107 349 8729% 27% 31% 32% 31% 27% 29% 24% 25% 32% 30% 17% 23% 24% 32% 31%

a a E GH

Tend to disagree (2) 482 154 242 78 306 120 27 67 94 387 17 4 6 47 283 7021% 21% 20% 22% 23% 16% 12% 12% 12% 25% 10% 15% 10% 11% 26% 25%

E FGH

Strongly disagree (1) 300 97 145 51 172 65 25 30 55 245 11 2 9 15 151 4713% 13% 12% 15% 13% 9% 11% 5% 7% 16% 7% 10% 15% 4% 14% 17%

E GH FGH M

Don't know 147 56 70 19 84 43 12 36 47 100 10 - 6 24 68 196% 8% 6% 5% 6% 6% 5% 6% 6% 7% 6% - 10% 6% 6% 7%

NETS

Net: Agree 698 222 376 90 340 313 101 287 389 309 76 14 25 243 239 5630% 31% 31% 26% 26% 42% 44% 52% 50% 20% 46% 58% 41% 56% 22% 20%

c C D I FI I L

Net: Disagree 781 251 387 129 478 185 52 97 149 632 28 6 16 63 434 11634% 35% 32% 37% 36% 25% 22% 18% 19% 42% 17% 25% 26% 14% 40% 42%

b E g FGH M

Mean score 2.90 2.89 2.95 2.78 2.80 3.23 3.29 3.50 3.44 2.63 3.40 3.55 3.14 3.59 2.69 2.62C D I FI fI L

Standard deviation 1.16 1.17 1.15 1.11 1.09 1.17 1.22 1.11 1.15 1.06 1.12 1.37 1.29 1.04 1.04 1.08Standard error .02 .05 .03 .06 .03 .04 .08 .05 .04 .03 .08 .24 .16 .05 .03 .07

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 15

Page 25: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 11/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsC1_SUM. Thinking about the process of registering. how far would you agree or disagree that...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All doctors apllicable to answer

NETS

Total Agree strongly Tend to agreeNeither agree nor

disagree Tend to disagree Disagree strongly Don't knowWould rather not

say No response Agree Disagree Mean

The process of registering for the List ofRegistered Medical Practitioners was fair to youpersonally 2306 939 953 250 30 40 84 5 5 1891 70 4.23

100% 41% 41% 11% 1% 2% 4% * * 82% 3%

The process of registering for the SpecialistRegister was fair to you personally 715 368 246 65 16 4 12 1 4 613 20 4.37

100% 51% 34% 9% 2% 1% 2% * 1% 86% 3%

The process of registering for the GP Registerwas fair to you personally 600 217 253 80 12 - 32 3 2 470 12 4.20

100% 36% 42% 13% 2% - 5% * * 78% 2%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 16

Page 26: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 12/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsC1_1. Thinking about the process of registering. How far would you agree or disagree that...

The process of registering for the List of Registered Medical Practitioners was fair to you personallyBase: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Agree strongly (5) 939 263 504 157 563 289 99 245 344 595 71 8 33 200 459 8141% 36% 42% 45% 43% 39% 43% 44% 44% 39% 44% 32% 53% 46% 42% 29%

A A e I I O

Tend to agree (4) 953 320 488 134 553 302 96 209 305 648 67 11 20 161 466 12941% 44% 41% 38% 42% 41% 42% 38% 39% 43% 41% 46% 33% 37% 43% 46%

c Gh

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 250 82 132 31 120 91 24 55 79 171 17 2 6 42 98 4711% 11% 11% 9% 9% 12% 10% 10% 10% 11% 10% 10% 9% 10% 9% 17%

D N

Tend to disagree (2) 30 12 14 4 12 14 1 10 11 20 1 - 1 8 11 61% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% * 2% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 2% 1% 2%

d

Disagree strongly (1) 40 8 26 6 20 16 4 19 23 17 3 1 2 13 14 32% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 2% 4% 4% 3% 1% 1%

I I

Don't know 84 35 32 14 43 27 8 14 22 62 5 2 - 13 38 124% 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% 8% - 3% 4% 4%

B g

Would rather not say 5 2 2 - - 1 - 1 1 4 - - - 1 - 1* * * - - * - * * * - - - * - *

No response 5 - 2 4 4 - - - - 5 - - - - 4 -* - * 1% * - - - - * - - - - * -

AB h

NETS

Net: Agree 1891 583 992 291 1116 590 194 454 649 1243 138 19 53 361 925 21082% 81% 83% 84% 85% 80% 84% 82% 83% 82% 85% 78% 86% 83% 85% 76%

E O

Net: Disagree 70 20 41 9 31 30 5 29 33 37 4 1 3 21 25 93% 3% 3% 3% 2% 4% 2% 5% 4% 2% 2% 4% 5% 5% 2% 3%

D FI fI

Mean score 4.23 4.19 4.23 4.31 4.28 4.17 4.28 4.21 4.23 4.23 4.28 4.11 4.31 4.25 4.28 4.06Ab E O

Standard deviation .84 .80 .86 .82 .80 .89 .80 .95 .91 .80 .81 .94 .97 .92 .78 .81

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 17

Page 27: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 12/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsC1_1. Thinking about the process of registering. How far would you agree or disagree that...

The process of registering for the List of Registered Medical Practitioners was fair to you personallyBase: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Standard error .02 .03 .03 .04 .02 .03 .05 .04 .03 .02 .06 .17 .12 .04 .03 .05

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 18

Page 28: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 13/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsC1_2. Thinking about the process of registering. How far would you agree or disagree that...

The process of registering for the GP Register was fair to you personallyBase: All doctors on the GP Register

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 521 67 313 133 336 122 44 75 119 402 31 5 14 54 291 63

Weighted Total 600 81 375 132 382 134 46 75 121 479 31 4 14 54 336 77100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Agree strongly (5) 217 28 136 52 150 46 20 38 58 160 14 2 8 28 128 1636% 35% 36% 40% 39% 34% 43% 50% 48% 33% 43% 57% 59% 52% 38% 21%

I I O

Tend to agree (4) 253 37 156 54 161 56 16 26 42 210 11 1 3 18 146 3642% 46% 42% 41% 42% 41% 36% 35% 35% 44% 36% 29% 22% 34% 43% 47%

h

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 80 12 58 9 40 25 7 9 16 63 6 - 3 6 32 1913% 14% 15% 6% 11% 19% 16% 12% 14% 13% 18% - 19% 11% 10% 25%

c C D N

Tend to disagree (2) 12 1 7 5 7 2 1 - 1 12 - 1 - - 7 22% 1% 2% 4% 2% 2% 1% - * 2% - 14% - - 2% 3%

Disagree strongly (1) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Don't know 32 4 17 10 22 4 2 1 2 30 1 - - 1 21 45% 4% 5% 7% 6% 3% 4% 1% 2% 6% 3% - - 1% 6% 5%

gh

Would rather not say 3 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 2 - - - 1 - -* - * - - 1% - 2% 1% * - - - 3% - -

d

No response 2 - - 2 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 -* - - 2% 1% - - - - * - - - - 1% -

B

NETS

Net: Agree 470 65 291 107 310 101 36 64 100 370 25 3 11 46 274 5278% 81% 78% 81% 81% 76% 79% 85% 83% 77% 79% 86% 81% 85% 81% 68%

O

Net: Disagree 12 1 7 5 7 2 1 - 1 12 - 1 - - 7 22% 1% 2% 4% 2% 2% 1% - * 2% - 14% - - 2% 3%

Mean score 4.20 4.20 4.18 4.28 4.27 4.12 4.26 4.39 4.34 4.16 4.26 4.29 4.40 4.42 4.26 3.90e I I O

Standard deviation .76 .71 .77 .78 .73 .78 .78 .70 .73 .76 .76 1.17 .81 .69 .73 .76Standard error .03 .09 .04 .07 .04 .07 .12 .08 .07 .04 .14 .53 .22 .10 .04 .10

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 19

Page 29: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 14/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsC1_3. Thinking about the process of registering. How far would you agree or disagree that...

The process of registering for the Specialist Register was fair to you personallyBase: All doctors on the Specialist Register

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% *a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% *A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 815 23 544 231 541 192 140 167 307 508 103 8 26 125 412 59

Weighted Total 715 23 497 177 482 154 111 133 243 472 80 4 23 96 379 54100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Agree strongly (5) 368 14 257 91 244 92 62 75 137 231 49 2 13 55 181 3551% 60% 52% 52% 51% 60% 56% 57% 56% 49% 61% 52% 59% 57% 48% 65%

D i I N

Tend to agree (4) 246 9 168 61 176 39 33 40 73 172 21 1 7 28 149 1034% 40% 34% 35% 36% 25% 30% 30% 30% 37% 26% 23% 29% 29% 39% 18%

E h O

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 65 - 45 15 40 14 9 11 20 45 6 1 2 7 32 69% - 9% 9% 8% 9% 8% 8% 8% 10% 8% 12% 9% 7% 8% 11%

Tend to disagree (2) 16 - 12 4 10 4 3 2 5 11 1 1 1 1 8 22% - 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 13% 3% 2% 2% 5%

Disagree strongly (1) 4 - 3 1 2 1 2 - 2 2 1 - - - 1 11% - 1% 1% * * 2% - 1% * 2% - - - * 1%

g

Don't know 12 - 9 1 7 3 2 3 5 7 2 - - 3 5 -2% - 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% - - 4% 1% -

Would rather not say 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - * - - 1% - 1% * - - - - 1% - -

d i

No response 4 - 2 2 4 - - - - 4 - - - - 4 -1% - * 1% 1% - - - - 1% - - - - 1% -

NETS

Net: Agree 613 23 426 153 419 131 95 115 210 403 70 3 20 83 330 4586% 100% 86% 86% 87% 85% 86% 87% 86% 85% 87% 75% 88% 87% 87% 83%

Net: Disagree 20 - 15 5 12 5 5 2 7 13 3 1 1 1 9 33% - 3% 3% 2% 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 13% 3% 2% 2% 6%

Mean score 4.37 4.60 4.37 4.37 4.38 4.45 4.38 4.47 4.43 4.34 4.47 4.15 4.44 4.49 4.35 4.41i

Standard deviation .79 .50 .80 .80 .77 .81 .89 .72 .80 .79 .84 1.22 .80 .71 .75 .94Standard error .03 .10 .03 .05 .03 .06 .08 .06 .05 .04 .08 .43 .16 .06 .04 .12

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 20

Page 30: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 15/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsC2_SUM. And thinking more widely, how fair, if at all, do you think the following registration process is/processes are?

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All doctors apllicable to answer

NETS

Total Fair to everyoneFair to the majority of

peopleFair to a minority of

people only Not fair to anyone Don't know Would rather not say No responseFair to everyone/ the

majorityFair to a minority/ not

fair to anyone

The process of registering for the List of RegisteredMedical Practitioners (general registration) 2306 477 1135 59 26 574 17 19 1612 85

100% 21% 49% 3% 1% 25% 1% 1% 70% 4%

The process of registering for the Specialist Register 715 156 357 17 11 165 7 2 513 28100% 22% 50% 2% 2% 23% 1% * 72% 4%

The process of registering for the GP Register 600 98 308 7 2 180 2 3 407 9100% 16% 51% 1% * 30% * * 68% 1%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 21

Page 31: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 16/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsC2_1. And thinking more widely, how fair, if at all, do you think the following registration process is/processes are?

The process of registering for the List of Registered Medical Practitioners (general registration)Base: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Fair to everyone 477 147 252 68 286 139 57 130 187 290 37 6 17 104 231 3021% 20% 21% 20% 22% 19% 25% 24% 24% 19% 23% 24% 28% 24% 21% 11%

I I I O

Fair to the majority of people 1135 364 584 172 632 387 105 282 387 748 73 12 29 226 530 14849% 51% 49% 49% 48% 52% 45% 51% 49% 49% 45% 51% 47% 52% 49% 53%

d

Fair to a minority of people only 59 19 34 6 29 27 6 24 29 30 4 1 2 20 23 63% 3% 3% 2% 2% 4% 2% 4% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 5% 2% 2%

D I I

Not fair to anyone 26 8 15 4 15 8 2 6 8 18 2 - 1 3 12 51% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% 2%

Don't know 574 174 295 96 334 169 60 105 165 409 45 5 11 82 277 8325% 24% 25% 28% 25% 23% 26% 19% 21% 27% 28% 20% 18% 19% 25% 30%

Gh GH

Would rather not say 17 3 12 1 7 4 * 6 6 10 - * 1 2 6 11% * 1% * 1% * * 1% 1% 1% - 2% 2% 1% 1% *

j

No response 19 7 9 2 12 5 1 - 1 18 1 - - - 11 51% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% * - * 1% 1% - - - 1% 2%

GH

NETS

Net: Fair to everyone/ the majority 1612 511 836 240 918 526 162 412 574 1037 111 18 46 330 762 17870% 71% 70% 69% 70% 71% 70% 74% 73% 68% 68% 76% 74% 75% 70% 64%

I I o

Net: Fair to a minority/ not fair to anyone 85 27 49 9 44 35 7 30 37 48 6 1 3 24 34 114% 4% 4% 3% 3% 5% 3% 5% 5% 3% 4% 2% 6% 5% 3% 4%

I I

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 22

Page 32: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 17/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsC2_2. And thinking more widely, how fair, if at all, do you think the following registration process is/processes are?

The process of registering for the GP RegisterBase: All doctors on the GP Register

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 521 67 313 133 336 122 44 75 119 402 31 5 14 54 291 63

Weighted Total 600 81 375 132 382 134 46 75 121 479 31 4 14 54 336 77100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Fair to everyone 98 16 56 26 71 19 8 16 24 74 7 1 3 12 60 616% 19% 15% 20% 19% 14% 18% 21% 20% 15% 22% 31% 25% 23% 18% 7%

O

Fair to the majority of people 308 38 192 73 194 68 20 40 60 248 12 2 6 28 176 3851% 47% 51% 55% 51% 50% 43% 53% 50% 52% 37% 41% 40% 52% 52% 50%

Fair to a minority of people only 7 - 6 1 4 3 - 1 1 6 - - - 1 4 11% - 1% 1% 1% 2% - 2% 1% 1% - - - 3% 1% 2%

Not fair to anyone 2 - 2 - 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 -* - * - * - - - - * - - - - * -

Don't know 180 27 119 31 110 45 18 18 35 145 13 1 5 12 93 3130% 34% 32% 24% 29% 33% 39% 23% 29% 30% 40% 28% 35% 23% 28% 41%

c g N

Would rather not say 2 - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - -* - - - - - - - - * - - - - - -

No response 3 - 2 1 1 - - - - 3 - - - - 1 -* - * 1% * - - - - 1% - - - - * -

NETS

Net: Fair to everyone/ the majority 407 54 247 99 265 87 28 56 84 323 19 3 9 40 237 4468% 66% 66% 74% 69% 65% 61% 75% 70% 67% 60% 72% 65% 75% 70% 57%

b O

Net: Fair to a minority/ not fair to anyone 9 - 7 1 6 3 - 1 1 7 - - - 1 6 11% - 2% 1% 1% 2% - 2% 1% 1% - - - 3% 2% 2%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 23

Page 33: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 18/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsC2_3. And thinking more widely, how fair, if at all, do you think the following registration process is/processes are?

The process of registering for the Specialist RegisterBase: All doctors on the Specialist Register

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% *A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 815 23 544 231 541 192 140 167 307 508 103 8 26 125 412 59

Weighted Total 715 23 497 177 482 154 111 133 243 472 80 4 23 96 379 54100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Fair to everyone 156 6 113 34 97 41 27 40 67 89 20 1 6 30 71 1022% 26% 23% 19% 20% 27% 25% 30% 28% 19% 25% 25% 27% 31% 19% 19%

d I I

Fair to the majority of people 357 14 240 93 248 70 54 62 117 241 39 3 10 43 198 2450% 63% 48% 53% 51% 45% 49% 47% 48% 51% 49% 63% 45% 45% 52% 44%

Fair to a minority of people only 17 - 14 3 11 5 2 4 6 12 1 - 1 3 9 22% - 3% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 2% 1% - 4% 3% 2% 5%

Not fair to anyone 11 - 8 3 5 5 2 4 6 5 1 - - 3 4 12% - 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% - - 4% 1% 2%

d i

Don't know 165 3 117 40 113 33 25 22 47 119 20 - 4 16 89 1723% 11% 24% 23% 23% 21% 22% 17% 19% 25% 25% - 19% 17% 24% 31%

Gh

Would rather not say 7 - 5 2 6 1 1 1 2 5 - 1 1 - 5 -1% - 1% 1% 1% * * 1% 1% 1% - 12% 5% - 1% -

No response 2 - - 2 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 -* - - 1% * - - - - * - - - - 1% -

B

NETS

Net: Fair to everyone/ the majority 513 20 353 127 345 111 82 102 184 329 59 4 16 73 270 3472% 89% 71% 72% 71% 72% 74% 77% 75% 70% 73% 88% 72% 76% 71% 63%

i i

Net: Fair to a minority/ not fair to anyone 28 - 22 6 16 10 4 8 11 17 2 - 1 6 13 44% - 4% 3% 3% 6% 3% 6% 5% 4% 2% - 4% 7% 3% 6%

d

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 24

Page 34: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 19/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD1_SUM. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All Doctors

NETS Total Very confident Fairly confident Not very confident Not at all confident Don't know Confident Not confident Mean

Listening to and communicating well with patients 2306 538 1462 177 34 94 2000 211 3.13100% 23% 63% 8% 1% 4% 87% 9%

Team work and interpersonal skills 2306 341 1479 321 41 123 1821 362 2.97100% 15% 64% 14% 2% 5% 79% 16%

Clinical knowledge 2306 265 1505 360 81 95 1770 441 2.88100% 11% 65% 16% 4% 4% 77% 19%

Being prepared for practice overall 2306 140 1401 546 100 119 1541 646 2.72100% 6% 61% 24% 4% 5% 67% 28%

Clinical reasoning and making a diagnosis 2306 173 1368 556 108 101 1541 664 2.73100% 7% 59% 24% 5% 4% 67% 29%

Clinical procedure and skills 2306 168 1248 625 136 129 1415 762 2.66100% 7% 54% 27% 6% 6% 61% 33%

Administrative tasks 2306 196 1076 687 173 174 1272 860 2.61100% 8% 47% 30% 7% 8% 55% 37%

Emotional resilience - being able to manage their emotionswell and respond compassionately to others 2306 77 914 827 298 189 992 1125 2.36

100% 3% 40% 36% 13% 8% 43% 49%

Physical demands e.g. hours worked and impact on their ownhealth 2306 99 746 908 394 159 845 1302 2.26

100% 4% 32% 39% 17% 7% 37% 56%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 25

Page 35: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 20/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD1_1. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas...

Being prepared for practice overallBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 140 48 75 14 61 66 25 52 77 63 15 8 6 42 40 166% 7% 6% 4% 5% 9% 11% 9% 10% 4% 9% 33% 10% 10% 4% 6%

c D I I I J n

Fairly confident (3) 1401 482 716 188 809 450 125 349 474 927 94 9 35 284 680 15761% 67% 60% 54% 62% 61% 54% 63% 60% 61% 58% 39% 57% 65% 62% 56%

BC C F f F K o

Not very confident (2) 546 157 274 102 306 169 55 114 169 377 36 4 15 83 255 8324% 22% 23% 29% 23% 23% 24% 21% 22% 25% 22% 15% 24% 19% 23% 30%

AB Gh N

Not at all confident (1) 100 14 65 19 63 27 5 13 19 81 2 1 4 9 57 174% 2% 5% 6% 5% 4% 2% 2% 2% 5% 1% 5% 6% 2% 5% 6%

A A FGH M

Don't know 119 19 70 24 76 27 21 24 46 74 16 2 1 19 59 65% 3% 6% 7% 6% 4% 9% 4% 6% 5% 10% 9% 2% 4% 5% 2%

A A E GhI O

NETS

Net: Confident 1541 530 791 203 870 516 149 402 551 990 108 17 41 326 720 17367% 74% 66% 58% 66% 70% 65% 73% 70% 65% 66% 72% 67% 75% 66% 62%

BC C d FI fI

Net: Not confident 646 171 339 121 368 196 60 127 187 458 39 5 18 92 311 10028% 24% 28% 35% 28% 27% 26% 23% 24% 30% 24% 20% 30% 21% 29% 36%

A AB GH m N

Mean score 2.72 2.80 2.71 2.61 2.70 2.78 2.81 2.83 2.83 2.67 2.82 3.09 2.74 2.86 2.68 2.63BC C D I I I J

Standard deviation .65 .58 .67 .67 .64 .66 .67 .62 .64 .65 .61 .87 .74 .60 .64 .69Standard error .01 .02 .02 .03 .02 .02 .04 .03 .02 .02 .05 .16 .09 .03 .02 .04

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 26

Page 36: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 21/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD1_2. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas...

Listening to and communicating well with patientsBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 538 223 262 45 306 191 47 136 183 355 30 10 9 115 267 6623% 31% 22% 13% 23% 26% 21% 25% 23% 23% 18% 41% 15% 26% 25% 24%

BC C J L

Fairly confident (3) 1462 458 756 230 829 459 133 345 478 984 95 14 41 266 693 17963% 63% 63% 66% 63% 62% 58% 62% 61% 65% 58% 58% 67% 61% 64% 64%

Fh

Not very confident (2) 177 21 111 39 98 59 31 46 77 100 24 - 8 37 67 228% 3% 9% 11% 7% 8% 13% 8% 10% 7% 15% - 12% 8% 6% 8%

A A GhI I K

Not at all confident (1) 34 5 18 11 23 8 2 5 7 27 2 * 2 3 19 51% 1% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% 2% 2%

AB h M

Don't know 94 14 54 22 58 24 17 22 39 56 13 - 1 18 44 64% 2% 4% 6% 4% 3% 7% 4% 5% 4% 8% - 2% 4% 4% 2%

A A GI k

NETS

Net: Confident 2000 681 1017 276 1135 649 181 481 661 1339 124 24 50 380 960 24587% 94% 85% 79% 86% 88% 78% 87% 84% 88% 76% 98% 82% 87% 88% 88%

BC C F F FH J

Net: Not confident 211 26 129 50 121 67 33 51 84 127 25 * 10 39 86 279% 4% 11% 14% 9% 9% 14% 9% 11% 8% 16% 2% 16% 9% 8% 10%

A AB GI i K m

Mean score 3.13 3.27 3.10 2.95 3.13 3.16 3.06 3.15 3.12 3.14 3.02 3.37 2.96 3.17 3.16 3.12BC C F f J L

Standard deviation .61 .55 .62 .63 .61 .61 .63 .60 .61 .60 .63 .59 .65 .60 .61 .62Standard error .01 .02 .02 .03 .02 .02 .04 .02 .02 .02 .05 .10 .08 .03 .02 .04

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 27

Page 37: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 22/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD1_3. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas...

Clinical knowledgeBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 265 87 132 44 150 95 27 68 94 171 16 6 8 52 126 3711% 12% 11% 13% 11% 13% 12% 12% 12% 11% 10% 25% 13% 12% 12% 13%

J

Fairly confident (3) 1505 525 764 198 869 470 143 337 481 1024 106 15 33 272 730 18365% 73% 64% 57% 66% 64% 62% 61% 61% 67% 65% 64% 55% 62% 67% 66%

BC C GH

Not very confident (2) 360 88 194 68 189 133 36 108 145 215 24 2 15 84 149 4816% 12% 16% 20% 14% 18% 16% 20% 18% 14% 15% 7% 25% 19% 14% 17%

A A D I I

Not at all confident (1) 81 9 52 18 48 19 9 16 25 56 4 1 2 10 41 84% 1% 4% 5% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 2% 4% 3%

A A

Don't know 95 12 59 19 59 23 16 24 40 55 12 - 2 19 44 44% 2% 5% 6% 4% 3% 7% 4% 5% 4% 8% - 4% 4% 4% 1%

A A I O

NETS

Net: Confident 1770 612 896 243 1019 565 170 405 575 1195 122 21 41 324 856 22077% 85% 75% 70% 78% 76% 74% 73% 73% 79% 75% 89% 68% 74% 79% 79%

BC C fGH j

Net: Not confident 441 97 246 87 236 152 45 124 169 271 29 3 17 95 190 5519% 13% 20% 25% 18% 21% 20% 22% 22% 18% 18% 11% 29% 22% 17% 20%

A Ab I I

Mean score 2.88 2.97 2.86 2.82 2.89 2.89 2.88 2.86 2.87 2.89 2.89 3.10 2.80 2.87 2.90 2.91BC j

Standard deviation .64 .54 .67 .73 .64 .64 .66 .66 .66 .64 .61 .70 .72 .64 .64 .64Standard error .01 .02 .02 .04 .02 .02 .04 .03 .02 .02 .05 .12 .09 .03 .02 .04

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 28

Page 38: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 23/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD1_4. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas...

Clinical reasoning and making a diagnosisBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 173 54 85 31 88 71 21 55 76 97 13 5 6 45 69 217% 8% 7% 9% 7% 10% 9% 10% 10% 6% 8% 19% 9% 10% 6% 8%

D I I j

Fairly confident (3) 1368 462 702 184 803 427 131 318 449 919 98 15 34 258 671 15459% 64% 58% 53% 61% 58% 57% 58% 57% 60% 60% 61% 56% 59% 62% 55%

BC C o

Not very confident (2) 556 164 296 89 299 191 51 137 188 368 31 3 16 105 252 8424% 23% 25% 25% 23% 26% 22% 25% 24% 24% 19% 12% 26% 24% 23% 30%

N

Not at all confident (1) 108 24 57 23 64 26 11 19 30 78 8 1 4 10 52 155% 3% 5% 7% 5% 4% 5% 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% 7% 2% 5% 6%

A g M

Don't know 101 16 60 21 59 25 16 25 41 60 12 1 1 20 46 44% 2% 5% 6% 5% 3% 7% 4% 5% 4% 7% 4% 2% 4% 4% 1%

A A I O

NETS

Net: Confident 1541 516 788 215 892 498 152 373 525 1016 112 19 40 304 740 17567% 72% 66% 62% 68% 67% 66% 67% 67% 67% 68% 80% 65% 69% 68% 63%

BC

Net: Not confident 664 189 353 112 363 217 63 155 218 446 39 4 20 114 304 9929% 26% 29% 32% 28% 29% 27% 28% 28% 29% 24% 16% 33% 26% 28% 36%

A N

Mean score 2.73 2.77 2.72 2.68 2.73 2.76 2.75 2.77 2.77 2.71 2.77 2.99 2.69 2.81 2.73 2.66bC I I j

Standard deviation .67 .63 .67 .74 .66 .67 .70 .67 .68 .67 .68 .71 .74 .65 .66 .70Standard error .01 .03 .02 .04 .02 .02 .04 .03 .02 .02 .05 .13 .09 .03 .02 .04

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 29

Page 39: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 24/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD1_5. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas...

Clinical procedure and skillsBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 168 55 77 31 90 58 21 43 65 103 13 4 6 33 72 217% 8% 6% 9% 7% 8% 9% 8% 8% 7% 8% 16% 9% 8% 7% 8%

b

Fairly confident (3) 1248 448 621 167 738 382 117 255 372 876 86 13 27 209 625 16054% 62% 52% 48% 56% 52% 51% 46% 47% 58% 53% 54% 45% 48% 57% 57%

BC E FGH

Not very confident (2) 625 173 343 102 339 217 58 185 243 382 40 5 18 146 281 6627% 24% 29% 29% 26% 29% 25% 33% 31% 25% 25% 21% 29% 33% 26% 24%

A a d FI fI

Not at all confident (1) 136 28 78 26 71 48 12 38 50 86 7 1 6 25 58 226% 4% 6% 7% 5% 6% 5% 7% 6% 6% 4% 6% 10% 6% 5% 8%

A A

Don't know 129 17 82 23 76 35 23 32 55 74 17 1 4 25 55 106% 2% 7% 6% 6% 5% 10% 6% 7% 5% 11% 4% 7% 6% 5% 3%

A A GI I

NETS

Net: Confident 1415 504 698 198 828 441 138 299 436 979 99 17 33 243 696 18161% 70% 58% 57% 63% 60% 60% 54% 56% 64% 61% 69% 54% 55% 64% 65%

BC GH

Net: Not confident 762 201 420 128 410 264 70 223 293 469 47 6 24 170 339 8833% 28% 35% 37% 31% 36% 30% 40% 37% 31% 29% 27% 39% 39% 31% 31%

A A D FI FI

Mean score 2.66 2.75 2.62 2.62 2.68 2.64 2.71 2.58 2.62 2.69 2.72 2.82 2.57 2.61 2.69 2.67BC Gh GH

Standard deviation .71 .65 .72 .76 .69 .73 .73 .75 .74 .69 .69 .79 .82 .72 .68 .74Standard error .02 .03 .02 .04 .02 .03 .05 .03 .03 .02 .05 .14 .10 .03 .02 .05

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 30

Page 40: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 25/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD1_6. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas...

Team work and interpersonal skillsBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 341 141 164 30 170 140 34 103 137 204 20 8 10 89 141 4315% 20% 14% 8% 13% 19% 15% 19% 17% 13% 12% 35% 16% 20% 13% 16%

BC C D I I J

Fairly confident (3) 1479 500 760 202 843 474 136 359 495 984 101 15 38 278 704 18164% 69% 63% 58% 64% 64% 59% 65% 63% 65% 62% 61% 62% 64% 65% 65%

BC c f f

Not very confident (2) 321 56 178 79 193 87 35 56 91 230 22 1 8 44 163 4314% 8% 15% 23% 15% 12% 15% 10% 12% 15% 14% 2% 13% 10% 15% 15%

A AB e G GH k

Not at all confident (1) 41 7 25 9 28 9 3 4 7 34 2 * 2 3 25 62% 1% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2%

a A GH

Don't know 123 17 73 28 80 30 23 31 54 69 19 - 4 25 57 65% 2% 6% 8% 6% 4% 10% 6% 7% 5% 12% - 7% 6% 5% 2%

A A E GI I K O

NETS

Net: Confident 1821 641 924 232 1013 614 170 462 632 1189 120 23 48 367 845 22479% 89% 77% 67% 77% 83% 74% 84% 81% 78% 74% 96% 78% 84% 78% 81%

BC C D FI F J

Net: Not confident 362 63 202 88 221 96 38 60 98 265 24 1 9 46 188 4916% 9% 17% 25% 17% 13% 17% 11% 12% 17% 15% 4% 15% 11% 17% 17%

A AB E Gh GH k

Mean score 2.97 3.10 2.94 2.79 2.94 3.05 2.97 3.08 3.04 2.93 2.96 3.29 2.98 3.10 2.93 2.96BC C D FI fI J

Standard deviation .61 .56 .62 .64 .62 .61 .62 .58 .59 .62 .58 .61 .65 .58 .62 .63Standard error .01 .02 .02 .03 .02 .02 .04 .02 .02 .02 .04 .11 .08 .03 .02 .04

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 31

Page 41: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 26/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD1_7. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas...

Administrative tasksBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 196 76 97 21 100 76 36 62 98 98 25 7 8 47 67 218% 10% 8% 6% 8% 10% 16% 11% 13% 6% 16% 31% 13% 11% 6% 8%

bC D gI I I J

Fairly confident (3) 1076 382 558 122 614 340 108 253 360 716 77 11 26 195 511 13447% 53% 46% 35% 47% 46% 47% 46% 46% 47% 47% 45% 42% 45% 47% 48%

BC C

Not very confident (2) 687 201 349 128 388 225 45 153 198 489 30 3 14 131 345 9230% 28% 29% 37% 30% 30% 19% 28% 25% 32% 18% 12% 22% 30% 32% 33%

AB F f FGH

Not at all confident (1) 173 39 90 40 104 51 13 34 47 126 8 2 6 25 91 247% 5% 8% 11% 8% 7% 6% 6% 6% 8% 5% 7% 9% 6% 8% 9%

AB gH

Don't know 174 23 106 38 108 48 28 52 80 94 23 1 8 39 77 88% 3% 9% 11% 8% 7% 12% 9% 10% 6% 14% 6% 13% 9% 7% 3%

A A I I I O

NETS

Net: Confident 1272 458 655 143 714 416 144 315 459 813 102 18 34 242 578 15655% 63% 55% 41% 54% 56% 62% 57% 59% 53% 63% 76% 55% 55% 53% 56%

BC C I I

Net: Not confident 860 240 440 168 493 276 58 187 245 615 37 4 20 156 436 11537% 33% 37% 48% 37% 37% 25% 34% 31% 40% 23% 19% 32% 36% 40% 41%

AB F f FGH

Mean score 2.61 2.71 2.60 2.40 2.59 2.64 2.82 2.68 2.72 2.55 2.86 3.06 2.67 2.66 2.55 2.56BC C GhI I I

Standard deviation .76 .73 .76 .80 .76 .77 .80 .77 .78 .75 .77 .88 .87 .77 .75 .76Standard error .02 .03 .02 .04 .02 .03 .05 .03 .03 .02 .06 .16 .11 .04 .02 .05

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 32

Page 42: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 27/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD1_8. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas...

Emotional resilience - being able to manage their emotions well and respond compassionately to othersBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 77 24 45 8 26 43 16 34 50 27 9 4 3 28 14 113% 3% 4% 2% 2% 6% 7% 6% 6% 2% 6% 18% 5% 6% 1% 4%

D I I I J N

Fairly confident (3) 914 335 462 106 511 310 95 257 352 563 67 11 25 212 420 8840% 46% 39% 30% 39% 42% 41% 46% 45% 37% 41% 47% 40% 48% 39% 31%

BC C I I O

Not very confident (2) 827 244 426 143 487 244 75 167 242 585 52 7 19 127 415 10936% 34% 35% 41% 37% 33% 33% 30% 31% 38% 32% 31% 32% 29% 38% 39%

AB e fGH

Not at all confident (1) 298 82 157 55 183 85 15 40 55 243 12 * 9 25 163 6013% 11% 13% 16% 14% 12% 7% 7% 7% 16% 7% 2% 14% 6% 15% 21%

A FGH M N

Don't know 189 36 111 36 107 57 29 56 85 104 23 1 6 45 79 118% 5% 9% 10% 8% 8% 13% 10% 11% 7% 14% 2% 9% 10% 7% 4%

A A I I I k o

NETS

Net: Confident 992 359 507 114 537 354 111 291 402 590 76 16 28 240 433 9843% 50% 42% 33% 41% 48% 48% 53% 51% 39% 47% 65% 45% 55% 40% 35%

BC C D I I I J

Net: Not confident 1125 326 582 198 670 329 90 207 297 828 64 8 28 152 578 16949% 45% 49% 57% 51% 44% 39% 37% 38% 54% 39% 32% 46% 35% 53% 61%

AB E FGH m N

Mean score 2.36 2.44 2.36 2.22 2.31 2.46 2.56 2.57 2.57 2.26 2.53 2.84 2.40 2.62 2.28 2.18BC C D I I I J L o

Standard deviation .77 .75 .78 .76 .75 .79 .75 .74 .74 .76 .75 .75 .82 .71 .74 .82Standard error .02 .03 .02 .04 .02 .03 .05 .03 .03 .02 .06 .13 .10 .03 .02 .05

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 33

Page 43: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 28/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD1_9. How confident, if at all, are you that new graduate doctors are prepared for practice in relation to each of the following areas...

Physical demands e.g. hours worked and impact on their own healthBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 99 30 53 16 42 46 16 37 52 46 10 5 4 29 28 134% 4% 4% 5% 3% 6% 7% 7% 7% 3% 6% 19% 7% 7% 3% 4%

D I I I J

Fairly confident (3) 746 238 408 88 409 262 81 223 304 442 58 7 20 183 331 7132% 33% 34% 25% 31% 35% 35% 40% 39% 29% 35% 30% 32% 42% 30% 26%

C C D I I I

Not very confident (2) 908 301 447 150 540 269 81 186 267 641 57 6 18 149 466 11539% 42% 37% 43% 41% 36% 35% 34% 34% 42% 35% 23% 29% 34% 43% 41%

b B E FGH

Not at all confident (1) 394 126 196 65 229 117 28 56 84 310 17 5 13 37 198 7417% 17% 16% 19% 17% 16% 12% 10% 11% 20% 11% 22% 22% 9% 18% 27%

FGH j M N

Don't know 159 27 96 30 94 46 24 52 76 83 21 1 6 39 67 67% 4% 8% 9% 7% 6% 11% 9% 10% 5% 13% 4% 10% 9% 6% 2%

A A I I I O

NETS

Net: Confident 845 267 461 104 451 308 97 260 357 488 67 12 24 212 360 8437% 37% 38% 30% 34% 42% 42% 47% 45% 32% 41% 50% 39% 49% 33% 30%

C C D I I I

Net: Not confident 1302 427 643 214 769 386 110 242 351 951 74 11 31 186 664 18956% 59% 54% 61% 59% 52% 48% 44% 45% 62% 46% 46% 51% 43% 61% 68%

B B E FGH N

Mean score 2.26 2.25 2.29 2.18 2.22 2.34 2.41 2.48 2.46 2.16 2.42 2.49 2.27 2.51 2.19 2.08C D I I I L o

Standard deviation .81 .80 .81 .81 .78 .83 .82 .79 .80 .79 .79 1.09 .93 .76 .77 .84Standard error .02 .03 .02 .04 .02 .03 .05 .03 .03 .02 .06 .20 .12 .04 .02 .05

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 34

Page 44: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 29/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD2. How far do you agree or disagree that your undergraduate training adequately prepared you for your first foundation post?Base: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a *b *c d e *f *g h i *j *k *l *m n oSignificance Level: 95% A *B *C D E *F *G H I *J *K *L *M N O

Unweighted Total 278 266 10 - 161 97 20 19 39 239 13 4 - 18 148 75

Weighted Total 355 342 10 - 220 110 24 23 48 307 17 4 - 23 203 84100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100%

Agree strongly (5) 89 85 5 - 62 23 3 6 9 81 3 - - 6 60 1825% 25% 48% - 28% 21% 14% 23% 19% 26% 16% - - 24% 29% 21%

Agree slightly (4) 172 168 4 - 99 62 12 12 24 149 8 1 - 11 91 5049% 49% 43% - 45% 56% 49% 51% 50% 48% 46% 37% - 48% 45% 60%

d N

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 49 49 - - 33 12 6 1 7 42 4 1 - 1 29 914% 14% - - 15% 11% 23% 6% 15% 14% 24% 38% - 7% 14% 10%

Disagree slightly (2) 20 20 - - 14 4 2 - 2 18 2 - - - 12 46% 6% - - 6% 4% 9% - 5% 6% 13% - - - 6% 5%

Disagree strongly (1) 14 13 1 - 8 4 1 - 1 13 - 1 - - 8 34% 4% 9% - 4% 4% 4% - 2% 4% - 24% - - 4% 4%

Don't know 10 9 - - 3 5 - 5 5 5 - - - 5 3 -3% 2% - - 1% 4% - 20% 10% 2% - - - 21% 2% -

I

NETS

Net: Agree 262 253 9 - 162 85 15 17 33 229 11 1 - 16 151 6874% 74% 91% - 73% 77% 63% 74% 69% 75% 63% 37% - 73% 74% 81%

Net: Disagree 34 33 1 - 22 9 3 - 3 30 2 1 - - 20 89% 10% 9% - 10% 8% 13% - 7% 10% 13% 24% - - 10% 9%

Mean score 3.88 3.87 4.20 - 3.90 3.91 3.60 4.21 3.87 3.88 3.66 2.89 - 4.22 3.92 3.88Standard deviation .99 .98 1.18 - 1.01 .93 .99 .59 .88 1.00 .93 1.34 - .60 1.02 .94Standard error .06 .06 .37 - .08 .10 .22 .15 .15 .07 .26 .67 - .16 .08 .11

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 35

Page 45: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 30/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD5_SUM. Thinking about your medical education and training, how far would you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

NETS

Total Strongly agree Tend to agreeNeither agree nor

disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Agree Disagree Mean

The assessment process for your primary medicalqualification was fair to you personally 355 126 162 39 10 15 2 288 25 4.06

100% 35% 46% 11% 3% 4% 1% 81% 7%

The assessment process for the foundation programmewas fair to you personally 355 68 149 57 34 30 16 217 64 3.56

100% 19% 42% 16% 10% 9% 5% 61% 18%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 36

Page 46: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 31/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD5_1. Thinking about your medical education and training, how far would you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?

The assessment process for your primary medical qualification was fair to you personallyBase: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a *b *c d e *f *g h i *j *k *l *m n oSignificance Level: 95% A *B *C D E *F *G H I *J *K *L *M N O

Unweighted Total 278 266 10 - 161 97 20 19 39 239 13 4 - 18 148 75

Weighted Total 355 342 10 - 220 110 24 23 48 307 17 4 - 23 203 84100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 126 123 3 - 74 36 10 7 16 110 5 1 - 6 69 2935% 36% 25% - 34% 33% 40% 28% 34% 36% 29% 38% - 25% 34% 35%

Tend to agree (4) 162 158 3 - 102 56 9 15 25 138 8 1 - 15 94 4046% 46% 28% - 46% 51% 39% 65% 52% 45% 46% 37% - 68% 46% 47%

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 39 37 1 - 22 14 4 1 6 33 4 - - 1 18 1311% 11% 12% - 10% 13% 18% 6% 12% 11% 25% - - 7% 9% 15%

Tend to disagree (2) 10 9 1 - 9 1 - - - 10 - - - - 9 13% 3% 12% - 4% 1% - - - 3% - - - - 4% 1%

Strongly disagree (1) 15 13 2 - 13 2 1 - 1 14 - 1 - - 13 14% 4% 23% - 6% 2% 4% - 2% 5% - 24% - - 7% 1%

o

Don't know 2 2 - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - -1% 1% - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - -

NETS

Net: Agree 288 281 5 - 176 93 19 22 41 247 13 3 - 21 163 6981% 82% 52% - 80% 84% 79% 94% 86% 81% 75% 76% - 93% 80% 82%

Net: Disagree 25 22 4 - 22 3 1 - 1 24 - 1 - - 22 27% 6% 35% - 10% 3% 4% - 2% 8% - 24% - - 11% 3%

E O

Mean score 4.06 4.09 3.19 - 3.98 4.12 4.10 4.22 4.16 4.05 4.04 3.66 - 4.18 3.97 4.13Standard deviation .98 .95 1.59 - 1.07 .81 .98 .56 .79 1.01 .75 1.82 - .54 1.09 .81Standard error .06 .06 .50 - .08 .08 .22 .13 .13 .07 .21 .91 - .13 .09 .09

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 37

Page 47: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 32/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD5_2. Thinking about your medical education and training, how far would you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?

The assessment process for the foundation programme was fair to you personallyBase: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a *b *c d e *f *g h i *j *k *l *m n oSignificance Level: 95% A *B *C D E *F *G H I *J *K *L *M N O

Unweighted Total 278 266 10 - 161 97 20 19 39 239 13 4 - 18 148 75

Weighted Total 355 342 10 - 220 110 24 23 48 307 17 4 - 23 203 84100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 68 66 2 - 41 22 3 3 6 62 2 - - 3 39 1919% 19% 15% - 19% 20% 13% 12% 13% 20% 14% - - 13% 19% 23%

Tend to agree (4) 149 146 3 - 92 44 15 5 20 129 11 2 - 5 82 3642% 43% 28% - 42% 40% 61% 23% 42% 42% 62% 61% - 24% 40% 43%

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 57 56 1 - 38 18 1 8 9 48 1 - - 7 36 1116% 16% 12% - 17% 16% 6% 32% 19% 16% 8% - - 29% 18% 13%

Tend to disagree (2) 34 32 2 - 23 9 1 2 3 31 1 - - 2 21 710% 9% 22% - 10% 8% 6% 7% 6% 10% 8% - - 7% 11% 8%

Strongly disagree (1) 30 28 2 - 21 9 1 1 3 27 - 1 - 1 21 69% 8% 23% - 10% 8% 6% 6% 6% 9% - 39% - 7% 11% 7%

Don't know 16 15 - - 5 9 2 5 7 10 1 - - 5 3 45% 4% - - 2% 8% 8% 20% 14% 3% 8% - - 21% 2% 5%

D I

NETS

Net: Agree 217 212 4 - 133 66 18 8 26 191 13 2 - 8 121 5561% 62% 43% - 61% 60% 74% 35% 55% 62% 75% 61% - 36% 59% 66%

Net: Disagree 64 60 5 - 44 18 3 3 6 58 1 1 - 3 43 1318% 17% 45% - 20% 16% 12% 13% 13% 19% 8% 39% - 14% 21% 16%

Mean score 3.56 3.58 2.89 - 3.51 3.61 3.75 3.35 3.56 3.56 3.88 2.84 - 3.37 3.48 3.70Standard deviation 1.18 1.17 1.49 - 1.20 1.18 1.03 1.11 1.07 1.19 .79 1.70 - 1.14 1.23 1.16Standard error .07 .07 .47 - .10 .12 .24 .28 .18 .08 .23 .85 - .29 .10 .14

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 38

Page 48: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 33/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD6. Thinking more widely, would you say that the assessment process for a primary medical qualification is:Base: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a *b *c d e *f *g h i *j *k *l *m n oSignificance Level: 95% A *B *C D E *F *G H I *J *K *L *M N O

Unweighted Total 278 266 10 - 161 97 20 19 39 239 13 4 - 18 148 75

Weighted Total 355 342 10 - 220 110 24 23 48 307 17 4 - 23 203 84100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100%

Fair to all doctors 57 56 1 - 39 15 5 2 7 50 3 1 - 2 36 1216% 16% 10% - 18% 14% 22% 6% 14% 16% 17% 38% - 7% 18% 15%

Fair to a majority of doctors 251 244 6 - 157 75 16 15 31 220 11 2 - 14 145 5971% 71% 63% - 71% 68% 66% 63% 65% 72% 66% 62% - 62% 72% 70%

Fair to a minority of doctors 28 27 1 - 18 10 3 1 4 24 3 - - 1 15 88% 8% 14% - 8% 9% 12% 6% 9% 8% 17% - - 7% 8% 10%

Not fair to any doctors 2 2 - - 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 -* * - - 1% - - - - 1% - - - - 1% -

Don't know 17 14 1 - 5 10 - 6 6 12 - - - 6 5 55% 4% 12% - 2% 9% - 24% 12% 4% - - - 25% 2% 6%

D I

NETS

Net: Fair to everyone/ the majority 308 300 8 - 196 90 21 16 38 270 14 4 - 15 181 7187% 88% 73% - 89% 82% 88% 70% 79% 88% 83% 100% - 68% 89% 84%

Net: Fair to a minority/ not fair to anyone 30 28 1 - 20 10 3 1 4 25 3 - - 1 17 88% 8% 14% - 9% 9% 12% 6% 9% 8% 17% - - 7% 8% 10%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 39

Page 49: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 34/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD7. And would you say that the assessment process for a foundation programme is:Base: All doctors who received their PMQ in or after 2011

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a *b *c d e *f *g h i *j *k *l *m n oSignificance Level: 95% A *B *C D E *F *G H I *J *K *L *M N O

Unweighted Total 278 266 10 - 161 97 20 19 39 239 13 4 - 18 148 75

Weighted Total 355 342 10 - 220 110 24 23 48 307 17 4 - 23 203 84100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100%

Fair to all doctors 39 37 * - 23 13 1 2 3 36 - - - 2 23 1011% 11% 4% - 11% 12% 4% 11% 7% 12% - - - 11% 12% 12%

Fair to a majority of doctors 225 219 6 - 144 66 18 9 27 198 14 2 - 8 130 5664% 64% 61% - 66% 60% 76% 39% 58% 64% 83% 61% - 37% 64% 66%

Fair to a minority of doctors 55 52 3 - 35 19 1 6 7 48 - 1 - 6 35 1215% 15% 26% - 16% 17% 2% 26% 14% 16% - 14% - 27% 17% 14%

Not fair to any doctors 15 15 - - 9 2 1 2 3 12 1 - - 2 8 14% 4% - - 4% 2% 6% 7% 6% 4% 8% - - 7% 4% 1%

Don't know 20 20 1 - 7 10 3 4 7 13 1 1 - 4 6 56% 6% 9% - 3% 9% 12% 17% 15% 4% 8% 24% - 18% 3% 6%

D I

NETS

Net: Fair to everyone/ the majority 265 256 7 - 168 79 19 12 31 234 14 2 - 11 154 6675% 75% 65% - 76% 72% 80% 50% 65% 76% 83% 61% - 48% 76% 79%

Net: Fair to a minority/ not fair to anyone 69 67 3 - 45 21 2 8 10 60 1 1 - 8 43 1220% 20% 26% - 20% 19% 8% 33% 20% 19% 8% 14% - 34% 21% 15%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 40

Page 50: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 35/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD8a. For how many years have you been on the UK GP register?Base: All doctors on the GP Register

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 521 67 313 133 336 122 44 75 119 402 31 5 14 54 291 63

Weighted Total 600 81 375 132 382 134 46 75 121 479 31 4 14 54 336 77100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Less than a year 14 11 3 - 6 7 2 2 4 9 1 1 - 2 5 42% 13% 1% - 2% 5% 5% 3% 4% 2% 4% 31% - 4% 1% 5%

BC D n

1 - 5 years 100 35 50 11 52 33 3 20 23 77 3 - 2 15 46 1717% 43% 13% 8% 14% 24% 7% 26% 19% 16% 11% - 16% 28% 14% 23%

BC D FI f n

6 - 10 years 104 11 77 13 54 39 12 14 25 78 8 1 2 12 44 2617% 14% 20% 10% 14% 29% 25% 18% 21% 16% 26% 28% 11% 23% 13% 33%

C D N

11 - 15 years 59 3 45 11 35 15 7 9 16 43 3 1 1 7 31 710% 3% 12% 9% 9% 11% 15% 12% 13% 9% 10% 15% 9% 13% 9% 10%

A

16 - 20 years 108 8 91 8 79 15 11 17 28 80 7 - 6 9 65 718% 10% 24% 6% 21% 11% 24% 23% 23% 17% 22% - 45% 16% 19% 9%

AC E O

More than 20 years 198 13 100 82 143 23 11 12 23 175 9 1 3 8 131 1433% 16% 27% 62% 37% 17% 23% 16% 19% 37% 28% 25% 20% 14% 39% 19%

a AB E fGH O

NA - Not on this register 11 - 8 4 9 2 - 1 1 11 - - - 1 9 12% - 2% 3% 2% 2% - 1% 1% 2% - - - 2% 3% 2%

Don't know 6 - 3 3 4 - - - - 6 - - - - 4 -1% - 1% 2% 1% - - - - 1% - - - - 1% -

NETS

Net: Last 5 years 113 46 52 11 58 39 6 22 27 86 5 1 2 17 51 2119% 56% 14% 8% 15% 29% 13% 29% 23% 18% 14% 31% 16% 32% 15% 27%

BC c D FI N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 41

Page 51: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 36/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD8b. For how many years have you been on the UK Specialist register?Base: All doctors on the Specialist Register

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% *A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 815 23 544 231 541 192 140 167 307 508 103 8 26 125 412 59

Weighted Total 715 23 497 177 482 154 111 133 243 472 80 4 23 96 379 54100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Less than a year 18 6 9 1 7 8 3 5 8 9 1 1 - 4 6 32% 28% 2% * 2% 5% 3% 4% 3% 2% 2% 25% - 4% 2% 6%

D N

1 - 5 years 134 9 114 5 82 38 27 32 59 75 21 1 3 25 58 1219% 41% 23% 3% 17% 24% 24% 24% 24% 16% 26% 25% 12% 26% 15% 22%

C D I I I

6 - 10 years 153 2 125 23 90 39 24 34 59 94 16 1 5 26 69 1121% 10% 25% 13% 19% 25% 22% 26% 24% 20% 20% 24% 21% 27% 18% 21%

C d

11 - 15 years 119 1 90 25 78 28 17 26 43 76 13 1 7 18 59 1017% 3% 18% 14% 16% 18% 16% 20% 18% 16% 16% 13% 33% 18% 15% 18%

16 - 20 years 112 2 76 33 82 16 15 15 31 82 10 1 3 9 69 616% 9% 15% 19% 17% 10% 14% 11% 13% 17% 13% 13% 11% 10% 18% 11%

E gh

More than 20 years 176 2 80 89 140 26 23 20 44 133 19 - 5 14 115 1225% 9% 16% 50% 29% 17% 21% 15% 18% 28% 24% - 23% 15% 30% 22%

B E fGH

NA - Not on this register 2 - 2 - 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 -* - * - * - - - - * - - - - 1% -

Don't know 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1 -* - * - * - - - - * - - - - * -

NETS

Net: Last 5 years 151 16 123 6 89 46 30 37 67 84 22 2 3 29 64 1521% 68% 25% 4% 19% 30% 27% 28% 28% 18% 28% 50% 12% 30% 17% 28%

C D I I I N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 42

Page 52: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 37/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD9a. Did you undertake either your speciality training or GP training in the UK?

UK GP registerBase: All doctors who registered on the GP Register in the last 5 years

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b *c d e *f *g *h i *j *k *l *m n *oSignificance Level: 95% A B *C D E *F *G *H I *J *K *L *M N *O

Unweighted Total 94 35 44 12 48 33 5 20 25 69 4 1 2 16 42 16

Weighted Total 113 46 52 11 58 39 6 22 27 86 5 1 2 17 51 21100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes - all of the training 110 44 51 10 56 38 3 22 24 86 3 - 2 17 51 2197% 97% 98% 93% 97% 97% 45% 100% 89% 100% 58% - 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes - some of the training - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

No 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 - 3 - 2 1 - - - -3% 3% 2% 7% 3% 3% 55% - 11% - 42% 100% - - - -

NETS

Net: Yes 110 44 51 10 56 38 3 22 24 86 3 - 2 17 51 2197% 97% 98% 93% 97% 97% 45% 100% 89% 100% 58% - 100% 100% 100% 100%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 43

Page 53: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 38/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD9b. Did you undertake either your speciality training or GP training in the UK?

UK Specialist registerBase: All doctors who registered on the Specialist Register in the last 5 years

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a b *c d e f g h i *j *k *l m n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A B *C D E F G H I *J *K *L M N *O

Unweighted Total 163 15 133 9 93 52 36 43 79 84 25 4 3 34 65 14

Weighted Total 151 16 123 6 89 46 30 37 67 84 22 2 3 29 64 15100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes - all of the training 95 9 78 2 54 28 6 26 32 63 3 1 1 20 51 763% 57% 64% 34% 61% 62% 20% 72% 48% 74% 12% 49% 32% 71% 79% 46%

FH F FH

Yes - some of the training 13 - 12 - 8 5 2 5 7 6 2 - 1 4 5 19% - 10% - 8% 11% 8% 12% 10% 7% 8% - 33% 13% 7% 9%

No 43 7 33 4 27 13 22 6 28 16 18 1 1 5 9 729% 43% 26% 66% 31% 28% 73% 16% 42% 19% 80% 51% 35% 17% 14% 45%

GHI GI

NETS

Net: Yes 108 9 90 2 62 33 8 31 39 69 4 1 2 24 56 871% 57% 74% 34% 69% 72% 27% 84% 58% 81% 20% 49% 65% 83% 86% 55%

FH F FH

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 44

Page 54: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 39/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD11_SUM. Thinking about speciality training how far would you agree or disagree that:

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All doctors who registered on the Specialist Register in the last 5 years and undertook some or all of their speciality training in the UK

NETS

Total Strongly agree Tend to agreeNeither agree nor

disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Agree Disagree Mean

The assessment process for it was fair to you personally 108 33 52 14 8 1 - 85 9 4.00100% 31% 48% 13% 7% 1% - 79% 8%

The assessment process for it is fair to all those who gothrough the process 108 13 53 20 13 3 6 66 16 3.59

100% 12% 49% 19% 12% 2% 6% 61% 14%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 45

Page 55: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 40/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD11_1. Thinking about speciality training how far would you agree or disagree that:

The assessment process for it was fair to you personallyBase: All doctors who registered on the Specialist Register in the last 5 years and undertook some or all of their speciality training in the UK

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% *a b *c d e *f g h i *j *k *l *m n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A B *C D E *F G H I *J *K *L *M N *O

Unweighted Total 112 9 94 3 61 37 10 35 45 67 5 2 2 27 54 8

Weighted Total 108 9 90 2 62 33 8 31 39 69 4 1 2 24 56 8100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 33 3 30 1 18 14 1 10 11 22 1 - - 9 17 431% 30% 33% 37% 29% 41% 11% 32% 28% 32% 21% - - 39% 30% 53%

Tend to agree (4) 52 5 45 1 35 12 3 13 16 36 3 - 1 9 32 348% 56% 50% 37% 57% 35% 38% 42% 41% 52% 59% - 49% 38% 57% 33%

E

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 14 1 9 - 6 6 2 5 7 7 - 1 - 4 6 113% 13% 10% - 9% 18% 25% 17% 18% 10% - 58% - 17% 11% 15%

Tend to disagree (2) 8 - 5 1 3 2 2 2 4 4 1 - 1 2 1 -7% - 6% 27% 5% 5% 21% 8% 11% 5% 20% - 51% 6% 2% -

Strongly disagree (1) 1 - 1 - - * * 1 1 - - * - - - -1% - 1% - - 1% 5% 2% 3% - - 42% - - - -

Don't know - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

NETS

Net: Agree 85 8 75 2 53 26 4 23 27 58 4 - 1 18 49 779% 87% 83% 73% 86% 77% 49% 74% 69% 84% 80% - 49% 77% 87% 85%

h

Net: Disagree 9 - 6 1 3 2 2 3 5 4 1 * 1 2 1 -8% - 7% 27% 5% 6% 26% 10% 13% 5% 20% 42% 51% 6% 2% -

Mean score 4.00 4.17 4.07 3.83 4.10 4.10 3.29 3.94 3.80 4.11 3.81 2.16 2.97 4.10 4.15 4.38h

Standard deviation .91 .68 .88 1.64 .76 .95 1.15 1.00 1.05 .80 1.12 3.72 1.51 .91 .69 .77Standard error .09 .23 .09 .95 .10 .16 .36 .17 .16 .10 .50 2.63 1.06 .18 .09 .27

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 46

Page 56: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 41/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsD11_2. Thinking about speciality training how far would you agree or disagree that:

The assessment process for it is fair to all those who go through the processBase: All doctors who registered on the Specialist Register in the last 5 years and undertook some or all of their speciality training in the UK

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% *a b *c d e *f g h i *j *k *l *m n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A B *C D E *F G H I *J *K *L *M N *O

Unweighted Total 112 9 94 3 61 37 10 35 45 67 5 2 2 27 54 8

Weighted Total 108 9 90 2 62 33 8 31 39 69 4 1 2 24 56 8100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 13 - 13 - 6 6 - 4 4 9 - - - 4 6 212% - 14% - 10% 17% - 12% 10% 13% - - - 16% 11% 23%

Tend to agree (4) 53 6 46 1 35 15 3 15 18 35 3 - 1 13 31 249% 62% 51% 37% 56% 45% 39% 49% 47% 51% 60% - 49% 52% 56% 28%

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 20 1 17 - 8 10 1 9 10 10 1 1 - 7 7 319% 12% 19% - 13% 30% 18% 29% 27% 14% 20% 58% - 28% 12% 34%

D i

Tend to disagree (2) 13 2 8 - 6 3 4 1 5 8 1 * - 1 5 112% 26% 9% - 10% 8% 43% 3% 11% 12% 20% 42% - 4% 9% 16%

Strongly disagree (1) 3 - 1 1 2 - - 1 1 2 - - 1 - 1 -2% - 1% 27% 3% - - 3% 2% 3% - - 51% - 2% -

Don't know 6 - 5 1 5 - - 1 1 5 - - - - 5 -6% - 6% 37% 8% - - 4% 3% 7% - - - - 9% -

e

NETS

Net: Agree 66 6 59 1 41 21 3 19 22 44 3 - 1 16 37 461% 62% 65% 37% 66% 62% 39% 61% 57% 64% 60% - 49% 68% 67% 51%

Net: Disagree 16 2 9 1 8 3 4 2 5 10 1 * 1 1 6 114% 26% 10% 27% 13% 8% 43% 6% 14% 15% 20% 42% 51% 4% 11% 16%

Mean score 3.59 3.36 3.72 2.73 3.65 3.71 2.95 3.67 3.52 3.64 3.41 2.58 2.46 3.80 3.71 3.58Standard deviation .95 .92 .89 2.98 .95 .85 .96 .86 .92 .98 .91 1.86 2.26 .76 .90 1.07Standard error .09 .31 .09 2.11 .13 .14 .30 .15 .14 .12 .41 1.31 1.60 .15 .13 .38

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 47

Page 57: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 42/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE1. Revalidation is the process by which licensed doctors are required to demonstrate that they are up to date and fit to practise, by participating in annual appraisals and collectingand reflecting on supporting information. Which of the following applies to you?Base: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

I have been revalidated 1543 324 902 288 896 466 164 364 529 1014 113 17 44 278 738 17167% 45% 75% 83% 68% 63% 71% 66% 67% 67% 69% 71% 72% 64% 68% 61%

A AB E O

I have not been revalidated but have had annualappraisals 630 322 255 49 348 228 58 153 211 419 45 5 14 127 289 96

27% 45% 21% 14% 27% 31% 25% 28% 27% 28% 28% 20% 23% 29% 26% 34%BC C D N

I have neither been revalidated nor had annualappraisals 92 58 27 8 49 35 6 27 34 58 4 1 2 26 44 9

4% 8% 2% 2% 4% 5% 3% 5% 4% 4% 2% 5% 3% 6% 4% 3%BC

Would rather not say 41 17 17 3 21 11 2 9 11 31 1 1 1 7 19 32% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% * 4% 2% 2% 2% 1%

c j

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 48

Page 58: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 43/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE3_SUM. And drawing on your interaction with the GMC, as part of revalidation, how much would you agree or disagree that.

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

NETS

Total Strongly agree Tend to agreeNeither agree nor

disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know N/A Agree Disagree Mean

You were/ have been treated fairly by the GMC 2265 739 751 371 23 32 91 258 1490 56 4.12100% 33% 33% 16% 1% 1% 4% 11% 66% 2%

You received/ So far you have received sufficientinformation from the GMC about the process (e.g.how it would work, what supporting informationwould be required) 2265 528 841 370 219 107 33 166 1369 326 3.71

100% 23% 37% 16% 10% 5% 1% 7% 60% 14%

Any concerns you had were/ So far any of yourconcerns have been addressed by information youreceived from the GMC 2265 242 459 472 118 73 71 830 701 191 3.50

100% 11% 20% 21% 5% 3% 3% 37% 31% 8%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 49

Page 59: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 44/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE3_1. And drawing on your interaction with the GMC, as part of revalidation, how much would you agree or disagree that.

You were/ have been treated fairly by the GMCBase: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2265 612 1205 418 1253 790 265 619 884 1381 188 32 69 493 996 265

Weighted Total 2265 704 1184 345 1293 729 229 544 773 1491 162 23 60 430 1071 275100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 739 181 428 122 418 249 89 208 297 442 65 10 23 165 331 7433% 26% 36% 35% 32% 34% 39% 38% 38% 30% 40% 43% 38% 38% 31% 27%

A A I I I

Tend to agree (4) 751 237 397 110 443 232 65 180 245 506 48 7 23 138 372 8733% 34% 34% 32% 34% 32% 28% 33% 32% 34% 30% 30% 38% 32% 35% 32%

f

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 371 104 194 64 215 114 40 69 109 262 26 1 7 56 182 5716% 15% 16% 18% 17% 16% 17% 13% 14% 18% 16% 6% 12% 13% 17% 21%

g GH

Tend to disagree (2) 23 5 16 2 13 7 2 5 8 15 1 1 * 4 12 11% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% * 4% 1% 1% 1% 1%

j

Strongly disagree (1) 32 8 14 9 16 10 1 8 8 24 - - - 7 16 31% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 2% - - - 2% 1% 1%

aB

Don't know 91 31 37 16 50 27 13 17 30 61 8 2 1 14 41 124% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4% 6% 3% 4% 4% 5% 7% 2% 3% 4% 4%

g

N/A 258 137 97 21 138 90 19 57 76 182 14 2 6 46 117 4111% 19% 8% 6% 11% 12% 8% 10% 10% 12% 9% 10% 10% 11% 11% 15%

BC fh n

NETS

Net: Agree 1490 418 825 232 862 481 154 388 542 947 113 17 46 303 703 16166% 59% 70% 67% 67% 66% 67% 71% 70% 64% 70% 73% 76% 70% 66% 58%

A A I I O

Net: Disagree 56 13 30 12 28 17 3 13 16 39 1 1 * 11 27 42% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 3% * 4% 1% 3% 3% 1%

j

Mean score 4.12 4.08 4.15 4.08 4.12 4.15 4.21 4.22 4.22 4.06 4.27 4.34 4.29 4.21 4.09 4.03I I I

Standard deviation .88 .84 .87 .95 .86 .87 .83 .86 .85 .88 .77 .84 .72 .88 .87 .85Standard error .02 .04 .03 .05 .03 .03 .05 .04 .03 .03 .06 .16 .09 .04 .03 .06

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 50

Page 60: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 45/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE3_2. And drawing on your interaction with the GMC, as part of revalidation, how much would you agree or disagree that.

You received/ So far you have received sufficient information from the GMC about the process (e.g. how it would work, what supporting information would be required)Base: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2265 612 1205 418 1253 790 265 619 884 1381 188 32 69 493 996 265

Weighted Total 2265 704 1184 345 1293 729 229 544 773 1491 162 23 60 430 1071 275100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 528 113 319 94 292 189 63 165 228 300 49 5 19 129 224 5523% 16% 27% 27% 23% 26% 28% 30% 30% 20% 30% 23% 31% 30% 21% 20%

A A d I I I

Tend to agree (4) 841 231 467 132 495 268 77 206 283 558 54 9 27 162 415 9637% 33% 39% 38% 38% 37% 34% 38% 37% 37% 33% 41% 44% 38% 39% 35%

A a

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 370 118 178 64 209 105 40 77 117 253 27 1 8 60 174 4316% 17% 15% 18% 16% 14% 17% 14% 15% 17% 17% 6% 14% 14% 16% 16%

b

Tend to disagree (2) 219 91 94 30 133 65 23 35 59 160 18 1 2 31 114 3410% 13% 8% 9% 10% 9% 10% 6% 8% 11% 11% 2% 3% 7% 11% 12%

BC g GH

Strongly disagree (1) 107 40 52 11 54 34 8 16 24 82 4 2 2 12 48 195% 6% 4% 3% 4% 5% 4% 3% 3% 6% 3% 8% 4% 3% 4% 7%

c GH n

Don't know 33 16 12 3 18 13 5 9 15 18 3 1 - 8 15 31% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 4% - 2% 1% 1%

Bc

N/A 166 93 61 12 92 56 12 35 47 120 8 3 3 27 82 257% 13% 5% 4% 7% 8% 5% 6% 6% 8% 5% 15% 5% 6% 8% 9%

BC h J

NETS

Net: Agree 1369 345 786 225 787 457 140 372 512 857 103 15 45 291 638 15160% 49% 66% 65% 61% 63% 61% 68% 66% 57% 63% 64% 75% 68% 60% 55%

A A FI I

Net: Disagree 326 131 147 41 187 99 32 51 83 243 22 2 4 43 161 5314% 19% 12% 12% 14% 14% 14% 9% 11% 16% 13% 11% 7% 10% 15% 19%

BC g GH n

Mean score 3.71 3.48 3.82 3.81 3.71 3.78 3.77 3.94 3.89 3.62 3.83 3.84 4.00 3.93 3.67 3.54A A I FI I

Standard deviation 1.11 1.16 1.09 1.05 1.10 1.12 1.11 1.03 1.05 1.13 1.09 1.21 .98 1.03 1.10 1.20Standard error .02 .05 .03 .05 .03 .04 .07 .04 .04 .03 .08 .23 .12 .05 .04 .08

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 51

Page 61: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 46/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE3_3. And drawing on your interaction with the GMC, as part of revalidation, how much would you agree or disagree that.

Any concerns you had were/ So far any of your concerns have been addressed by information you received from the GMCBase: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2265 612 1205 418 1253 790 265 619 884 1381 188 32 69 493 996 265

Weighted Total 2265 704 1184 345 1293 729 229 544 773 1491 162 23 60 430 1071 275100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 242 50 146 46 129 96 35 85 120 122 26 5 9 68 94 2411% 7% 12% 13% 10% 13% 15% 16% 16% 8% 16% 21% 14% 16% 9% 9%

A A D I I I

Tend to agree (4) 459 133 254 69 258 164 41 133 174 285 30 5 14 108 214 5120% 19% 21% 20% 20% 23% 18% 24% 22% 19% 19% 23% 23% 25% 20% 18%

FI i

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 472 135 256 68 273 145 48 109 157 315 37 3 15 81 221 6121% 19% 22% 20% 21% 20% 21% 20% 20% 21% 23% 13% 25% 19% 21% 22%

Tend to disagree (2) 118 38 49 30 65 36 12 22 34 84 7 - 2 19 57 185% 5% 4% 9% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 6% 4% - 3% 4% 5% 6%

AB

Strongly disagree (1) 73 26 34 13 42 18 5 10 15 58 4 * 2 8 36 103% 4% 3% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 3%

GH

Don't know 71 22 34 12 35 30 9 18 26 44 6 1 2 15 27 153% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 5%

d N

N/A 830 301 410 108 492 238 79 168 247 583 53 9 18 132 422 9837% 43% 35% 31% 38% 33% 35% 31% 32% 39% 32% 39% 30% 31% 39% 36%

BC E GH

NETS

Net: Agree 701 183 400 115 386 261 76 218 294 407 56 10 22 176 308 7431% 26% 34% 33% 30% 36% 33% 40% 38% 27% 34% 44% 37% 41% 29% 27%

A A D I fI I

Net: Disagree 191 63 83 42 107 54 17 32 49 142 11 * 3 27 93 278% 9% 7% 12% 8% 7% 7% 6% 6% 10% 7% 2% 6% 6% 9% 10%

aB GH

Mean score 3.50 3.38 3.58 3.47 3.48 3.62 3.64 3.73 3.70 3.38 3.64 4.05 3.64 3.74 3.44 3.38A D I I I

Standard deviation 1.05 1.05 1.02 1.13 1.04 1.03 1.06 .98 1.00 1.06 1.04 .96 1.00 .99 1.04 1.05Standard error .03 .06 .04 .07 .04 .05 .08 .05 .04 .04 .10 .22 .15 .05 .04 .09

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 52

Page 62: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 47/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE4_SUM. Below is a list of statements about your practice. for each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago.

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

NETS

Total More than 12 months agoThe same amount as 12

months ago Less than 12 months ago Don't knowThe same/ less than 12

months ago

You are collecting information about your practice 2265 623 1372 142 128 1514100% 28% 61% 6% 6% 67%

You are reflecting on your practice 2265 592 1410 229 34 1639100% 26% 62% 10% 2% 72%

You are aware how to apply the principles of good medical practiceto your work 2265 462 1665 94 44 1759

100% 20% 74% 4% 2% 78%

You feel a part of a governed structure that supports yourprofessional development 2265 281 1267 570 147 1836

100% 12% 56% 25% 7% 81%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 53

Page 63: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 48/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE4_1. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago.

You are collecting information about your practiceBase: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2265 612 1205 418 1253 790 265 619 884 1381 188 32 69 493 996 265

Weighted Total 2265 704 1184 345 1293 729 229 544 773 1491 162 23 60 430 1071 275100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

More than 12 months ago 623 190 343 84 346 222 74 176 250 374 53 10 17 142 276 7128% 27% 29% 24% 27% 31% 32% 32% 32% 25% 33% 43% 28% 33% 26% 26%

c d I I I

The same amount as 12 months ago 1372 408 725 220 821 400 128 295 423 949 94 9 41 225 686 16661% 58% 61% 64% 63% 55% 56% 54% 55% 64% 58% 38% 67% 52% 64% 60%

a E FGH K M

Less than 12 months ago 142 45 68 27 66 58 12 36 48 93 5 3 3 31 59 246% 6% 6% 8% 5% 8% 5% 7% 6% 6% 3% 13% 5% 7% 5% 9%

D J n

Don't know 128 61 48 15 60 48 15 38 53 75 10 1 - 32 50 146% 9% 4% 4% 5% 7% 6% 7% 7% 5% 6% 6% - 7% 5% 5%

BC d i i L

NETS

Net: The same/less than 12 months ago 1514 453 793 247 887 458 140 331 471 1043 99 12 44 256 745 19067% 64% 67% 71% 69% 63% 61% 61% 61% 70% 61% 51% 72% 60% 70% 69%

Ab E FGH M

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 54

Page 64: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 49/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE4_2. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago.

You are reflecting on your practiceBase: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2265 612 1205 418 1253 790 265 619 884 1381 188 32 69 493 996 265

Weighted Total 2265 704 1184 345 1293 729 229 544 773 1491 162 23 60 430 1071 275100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

More than 12 months ago 592 197 306 81 307 238 64 187 251 340 48 9 19 154 240 7426% 28% 26% 23% 24% 33% 28% 34% 32% 23% 29% 41% 32% 36% 22% 27%

D i fI I

The same amount as 12 months ago 1410 402 756 231 843 399 136 293 430 980 94 9 39 223 709 16862% 57% 64% 67% 65% 55% 60% 54% 56% 66% 58% 37% 65% 52% 66% 61%

A A E fGH K M

Less than 12 months ago 229 93 103 30 130 76 23 48 71 158 16 4 2 40 113 3210% 13% 9% 9% 10% 10% 10% 9% 9% 11% 10% 18% 4% 9% 11% 12%

BC

Don't know 34 12 19 3 13 15 6 16 22 12 5 1 - 13 9 12% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 3% 4% - 3% 1% *

D I I I

NETS

Net: The same/less than 12 months ago 1639 495 859 261 973 475 159 341 500 1139 110 13 41 263 822 20072% 70% 73% 76% 75% 65% 70% 63% 65% 76% 68% 55% 68% 61% 77% 73%

a E G FGH

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 55

Page 65: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 50/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE4_3. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago.

You are aware how to apply the principles of good medical practice to your workBase: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2265 612 1205 418 1253 790 265 619 884 1381 188 32 69 493 996 265

Weighted Total 2265 704 1184 345 1293 729 229 544 773 1491 162 23 60 430 1071 275100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

More than 12 months ago 462 151 244 64 220 207 61 162 222 239 48 10 12 139 160 5820% 21% 21% 18% 17% 28% 27% 30% 29% 16% 30% 43% 20% 32% 15% 21%

D I I I L N

The same amount as 12 months ago 1665 500 875 262 1005 464 157 346 503 1162 108 10 47 258 850 19674% 71% 74% 76% 78% 64% 69% 64% 65% 78% 67% 43% 78% 60% 79% 71%

a E FGH K M O

Less than 12 months ago 94 34 43 16 46 42 9 26 35 59 5 1 1 24 40 164% 5% 4% 4% 4% 6% 4% 5% 5% 4% 3% 6% 1% 6% 4% 6%

D

Don't know 44 19 21 5 23 15 2 11 13 31 1 2 1 9 21 52% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% * 8% 1% 2% 2% 2%

J

NETS

Net: The same/less than 12 months ago 1759 534 919 277 1051 506 166 372 538 1221 114 11 47 282 889 21278% 76% 78% 80% 81% 69% 72% 68% 70% 82% 70% 50% 79% 66% 83% 77%

a E FGH K M O

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 56

Page 66: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 51/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE4_4. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago.

You feel a part of a governed structure that supports your professional developmentBase: All doctors who revealed whether or not they have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2265 612 1205 418 1253 790 265 619 884 1381 188 32 69 493 996 265

Weighted Total 2265 704 1184 345 1293 729 229 544 773 1491 162 23 60 430 1071 275100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

More than 12 months ago 281 91 151 37 135 125 30 105 135 146 24 5 8 91 102 2812% 13% 13% 11% 10% 17% 13% 19% 17% 10% 15% 24% 13% 21% 10% 10%

D i FI fI

The same amount as 12 months ago 1267 371 687 186 735 398 127 295 422 845 89 9 34 231 612 15856% 53% 58% 54% 57% 55% 55% 54% 55% 57% 55% 38% 56% 54% 57% 57%

A k

Less than 12 months ago 570 189 274 102 349 150 50 96 146 424 35 6 13 70 300 7425% 27% 23% 29% 27% 21% 22% 18% 19% 28% 22% 25% 22% 16% 28% 27%

b B E FGH

Don't know 147 52 72 21 75 56 22 49 71 77 14 3 5 38 56 147% 7% 6% 6% 6% 8% 10% 9% 9% 5% 9% 13% 8% 9% 5% 5%

d I I I

NETS

Net: The same/less than 12 months ago 1836 560 961 288 1084 548 177 391 568 1269 124 15 47 301 912 23281% 80% 81% 83% 84% 75% 77% 72% 73% 85% 76% 63% 79% 70% 85% 84%

E g FGH

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 57

Page 67: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 52/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE4_SUM. Below is a list of statements about your practice. for each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago.

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All doctors who have been revalidated

NETS

Total More than 12 months agoThe same amount as 12

months ago Less than 12 months ago Don't knowThe same/ less than 12

months ago

You are collecting information about your practice 1543 413 973 91 66 1064100% 27% 63% 6% 4% 69%

You are reflecting on your practice 1543 384 1007 134 18 1141100% 25% 65% 9% 1% 74%

You are aware how to apply the principles of good medical practiceto your work 1543 291 1171 48 33 1219

100% 19% 76% 3% 2% 79%

You feel a part of a governed structure that supports yourprofessional development 1543 178 892 376 98 1267

100% 12% 58% 24% 6% 82%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 58

Page 68: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 53/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE4_1. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago.

You are collecting information about your practiceBase: All doctors who have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1581 289 917 348 893 522 195 424 619 962 137 23 50 329 706 170

Weighted Total 1543 324 902 288 896 466 164 364 529 1014 113 17 44 278 738 171100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

More than 12 months ago 413 81 257 70 229 140 54 110 164 249 39 5 11 83 179 5127% 25% 28% 24% 26% 30% 33% 30% 31% 25% 34% 32% 25% 30% 24% 30%

d I I I

The same amount as 12 months ago 973 201 569 186 592 269 92 210 302 671 65 8 30 160 497 10163% 62% 63% 65% 66% 58% 56% 58% 57% 66% 57% 46% 69% 58% 67% 59%

E FGH O

Less than 12 months ago 91 19 49 22 48 30 8 20 29 62 3 2 3 16 42 126% 6% 5% 8% 5% 6% 5% 6% 5% 6% 3% 14% 7% 6% 6% 7%

Don't know 66 23 28 10 27 27 11 24 34 32 6 1 - 18 20 74% 7% 3% 3% 3% 6% 6% 6% 6% 3% 6% 9% - 7% 3% 4%

BC D I I I l

NETS

Net: The same/less than 12 months ago 1064 219 618 209 640 299 100 230 331 733 68 10 33 176 539 11369% 68% 68% 72% 71% 64% 61% 63% 63% 72% 60% 59% 75% 63% 73% 66%

E FGH m o

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 59

Page 69: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 54/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE4_2. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago.

You are reflecting on your practiceBase: All doctors who have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1581 289 917 348 893 522 195 424 619 962 137 23 50 329 706 170

Weighted Total 1543 324 902 288 896 466 164 364 529 1014 113 17 44 278 738 171100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

More than 12 months ago 384 87 223 67 203 146 45 113 158 226 34 5 12 91 158 5025% 27% 25% 23% 23% 31% 27% 31% 30% 22% 30% 29% 27% 33% 21% 29%

D I I N

The same amount as 12 months ago 1007 196 597 196 607 273 103 213 315 692 70 8 30 158 507 10865% 61% 66% 68% 68% 59% 62% 58% 60% 68% 62% 45% 68% 57% 69% 63%

a a E GH

Less than 12 months ago 134 38 70 23 81 36 14 28 42 92 8 4 2 20 70 129% 12% 8% 8% 9% 8% 9% 8% 8% 9% 7% 21% 5% 7% 9% 7%

B

Don't know 18 3 12 3 4 11 2 11 13 5 2 1 - 9 3 11% 1% 1% 1% * 2% 1% 3% 2% * 1% 6% - 3% * 1%

D I I

NETS

Net: The same/less than 12 months ago 1141 234 667 219 688 308 117 241 358 783 78 11 32 178 578 11974% 72% 74% 76% 77% 66% 71% 66% 68% 77% 69% 65% 73% 64% 78% 70%

E fGH O

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 60

Page 70: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 55/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE4_3. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago.

You are aware how to apply the principles of good medical practice to your workBase: All doctors who have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1581 289 917 348 893 522 195 424 619 962 137 23 50 329 706 170

Weighted Total 1543 324 902 288 896 466 164 364 529 1014 113 17 44 278 738 171100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

More than 12 months ago 291 64 172 54 142 123 37 96 133 158 29 6 7 81 107 3619% 20% 19% 19% 16% 26% 22% 26% 25% 16% 25% 34% 15% 29% 14% 21%

D I I I L N

The same amount as 12 months ago 1171 236 688 221 712 311 119 248 367 804 80 8 36 181 595 12276% 73% 76% 77% 79% 67% 73% 68% 69% 79% 71% 46% 82% 65% 81% 72%

E FGH M O

Less than 12 months ago 48 13 24 10 25 19 6 12 18 31 4 1 1 9 21 83% 4% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 9% 1% 3% 3% 5%

Don't know 33 11 18 4 16 13 2 9 12 21 1 2 1 7 15 52% 3% 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% 3% 2% 2% 1% 11% 2% 2% 2% 3%

c

NETS

Net: The same/less than 12 months ago 1219 249 712 231 737 330 125 259 385 835 84 9 37 190 616 13079% 77% 79% 80% 82% 71% 76% 71% 73% 82% 74% 55% 83% 68% 83% 76%

E FGH M O

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 61

Page 71: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 56/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE4_4. Below is a list of statements about your practice. For each, please indicate whether you would say that it is happening more, about the same, or less than it was 12 months ago.

You feel a part of a governed structure that supports your professional developmentBase: All doctors who have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1581 289 917 348 893 522 195 424 619 962 137 23 50 329 706 170

Weighted Total 1543 324 902 288 896 466 164 364 529 1014 113 17 44 278 738 171100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

More than 12 months ago 178 37 108 31 88 73 19 62 81 97 15 4 4 53 69 1712% 12% 12% 11% 10% 16% 12% 17% 15% 10% 13% 21% 8% 19% 9% 10%

D fI I l

The same amount as 12 months ago 892 175 540 157 534 260 97 203 300 591 69 6 28 156 437 9758% 54% 60% 54% 60% 56% 59% 56% 57% 58% 61% 37% 64% 56% 59% 57%

ac

Less than 12 months ago 376 89 199 84 225 96 34 61 96 280 20 6 7 41 197 4924% 27% 22% 29% 25% 21% 21% 17% 18% 28% 18% 34% 17% 15% 27% 29%

b B e fGH

Don't know 98 22 55 17 49 37 14 38 52 46 8 1 5 28 35 86% 7% 6% 6% 5% 8% 8% 11% 10% 4% 7% 9% 11% 10% 5% 5%

d I I I

NETS

Net: The same/less than 12 months ago 1267 264 739 241 759 355 131 264 396 871 90 12 36 197 634 14682% 82% 82% 83% 85% 76% 80% 73% 75% 86% 79% 71% 81% 71% 86% 86%

E G FGH

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 62

Page 72: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 57/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE5. You said that you are now collecting information about your practice more than you were 12 months ago. How helpful, if at all, would you say that this is in improving the qualityof your professional practice?Base: All doctors who say that they are now collecting more information about their practice than 12 months ago

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 623 166 346 105 333 242 85 199 284 339 61 13 19 163 253 66

Weighted Total 623 190 343 84 346 222 74 176 250 374 53 10 17 142 276 71100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very helpful (4) 114 34 66 14 37 70 15 60 75 39 11 4 3 54 23 1218% 18% 19% 17% 11% 31% 21% 34% 30% 10% 21% 41% 16% 38% 8% 17%

D I FI fI N

Fairly helpful (3) 249 78 140 29 146 91 32 68 100 149 25 4 7 59 113 2840% 41% 41% 35% 42% 41% 43% 39% 40% 40% 47% 45% 44% 42% 41% 39%

Not very helpful (2) 165 51 86 24 98 43 19 30 48 117 10 1 3 21 85 2126% 27% 25% 29% 28% 19% 25% 17% 19% 31% 18% 14% 15% 15% 31% 30%

E GH

Not at all helpful (1) 84 22 47 15 58 14 6 16 22 62 5 - 4 6 49 814% 12% 14% 18% 17% 6% 8% 9% 9% 17% 10% - 24% 4% 18% 12%

E fGH

Don't know 11 5 4 1 7 4 2 2 4 7 2 - - 2 5 22% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 3% - - 2% 2% 2%

NETS

Net: Helpful 363 112 205 44 183 161 48 128 175 188 36 9 10 113 137 3958% 59% 60% 52% 53% 72% 64% 73% 70% 50% 68% 86% 61% 79% 50% 56%

D I I I

Net: Unhelpful 249 73 134 39 156 58 25 45 70 179 15 1 7 27 134 2940% 38% 39% 46% 45% 26% 33% 26% 28% 48% 28% 14% 39% 19% 49% 42%

E FGH

Mean score 2.64 2.67 2.66 2.52 2.48 2.99 2.79 2.99 2.93 2.45 2.82 3.27 2.53 3.15 2.41 2.62D I fI I n

Standard deviation .94 .91 .95 .98 .90 .89 .88 .94 .93 .90 .90 .73 1.06 .83 .88 .91Standard error .04 .07 .05 .10 .05 .06 .10 .07 .06 .05 .12 .20 .24 .07 .06 .11

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 63

Page 73: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 58/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE6. Do you feel you were already reflecting enough on your practice 12 months ago?Base: All doctors who say that they are reflecting on their practice the same amount as 12 months ago

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1412 352 758 282 821 439 155 333 488 924 109 14 42 258 670 167

Weighted Total 1410 402 756 231 843 399 136 293 430 980 94 9 39 223 709 168100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 1276 360 686 212 769 358 120 258 378 898 83 9 38 194 649 15591% 90% 91% 92% 91% 90% 88% 88% 88% 92% 88% 100% 98% 87% 91% 93%

gH m

No 58 18 29 9 33 17 7 18 25 33 6 - - 16 27 14% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 6% 6% 3% 6% - - 7% 4% 1%

I I l O

Don't know 76 24 41 10 40 24 10 17 27 49 6 - 1 13 33 115% 6% 5% 4% 5% 6% 7% 6% 6% 5% 6% - 3% 6% 5% 7%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 64

Page 74: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 59/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE7_SUM. To what extent, if at all, would you say that the process of revalidation has had an impact on each of the following?

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All doctors who have been revalidated

NETS

Total5 - A very significant

impact 4 3 2 1 - No impact at all Don't knowSome/ Significant

impact Little/ no impact Mean

The amount of information you collect about your practice 1543 390 410 275 157 287 24 800 444 3.30100% 25% 27% 18% 10% 19% 2% 52% 29%

How much time you spend reflecting on your practice 1543 213 395 344 211 363 17 608 574 2.92100% 14% 26% 22% 14% 24% 1% 39% 37%

Your awareness of how to apply the principles of goodmedical practice to your work 1543 137 290 395 233 467 21 427 700 2.60

100% 9% 19% 26% 15% 30% 1% 28% 45%

The extent to which you feel a part of a governedstructure that supports your professional development 1543 105 244 416 254 474 50 349 728 2.50

100% 7% 16% 27% 16% 31% 3% 23% 47%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 65

Page 75: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 60/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE7_1. To what extent, if at all, would you say that the process of revalidation has had an impact on each of the following?

The amount of information you collect about your practiceBase: All doctors who have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1581 289 917 348 893 522 195 424 619 962 137 23 50 329 706 170

Weighted Total 1543 324 902 288 896 466 164 364 529 1014 113 17 44 278 738 171100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

5 - A very significant impact (5) 390 65 230 88 216 125 39 102 142 249 29 6 10 79 177 4025% 20% 25% 30% 24% 27% 24% 28% 27% 25% 26% 34% 23% 28% 24% 24%

a Ab

4 (4) 410 81 247 72 233 132 42 113 155 255 32 3 14 84 187 4427% 25% 27% 25% 26% 28% 25% 31% 29% 25% 28% 21% 32% 30% 25% 26%

I i

3 (3) 275 62 160 49 166 77 34 65 99 176 25 2 9 48 132 2818% 19% 18% 17% 18% 17% 21% 18% 19% 17% 22% 9% 19% 17% 18% 16%

2 (2) 157 31 98 25 101 46 19 25 44 112 12 4 3 23 86 1910% 10% 11% 9% 11% 10% 12% 7% 8% 11% 11% 26% 6% 8% 12% 11%

g Gh

1 - No impact at all (1) 287 77 155 52 171 76 28 50 78 209 14 2 8 37 148 3619% 24% 17% 18% 19% 16% 17% 14% 15% 21% 13% 11% 18% 13% 20% 21%

Bc GH

Don't know 24 7 14 3 9 10 3 9 11 13 1 - 1 6 7 42% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% - 2% 2% 1% 2%

NETS

Net: Some/ Significant impact 800 146 477 160 449 257 81 216 297 504 61 9 24 163 364 8452% 45% 53% 56% 50% 55% 49% 59% 56% 50% 54% 54% 54% 59% 49% 49%

A A d FI fI

Net: Little/ no impact 444 108 253 77 272 122 47 75 122 321 27 6 11 60 234 5529% 33% 28% 27% 30% 26% 29% 21% 23% 32% 24% 37% 24% 22% 32% 32%

bc e G GH

Mean score 3.30 3.08 3.34 3.42 3.25 3.40 3.28 3.54 3.46 3.22 3.43 3.40 3.36 3.53 3.22 3.20A A d FI I

Standard deviation 1.44 1.47 1.42 1.46 1.44 1.41 1.40 1.35 1.37 1.47 1.33 1.49 1.40 1.35 1.45 1.48Standard error .04 .09 .05 .08 .05 .06 .10 .07 .06 .05 .11 .31 .20 .08 .05 .11

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 66

Page 76: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 61/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE7_2. To what extent, if at all, would you say that the process of revalidation has had an impact on each of the following?

How much time you spend reflecting on your practiceBase: All doctors who have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1581 289 917 348 893 522 195 424 619 962 137 23 50 329 706 170

Weighted Total 1543 324 902 288 896 466 164 364 529 1014 113 17 44 278 738 171100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

5 - A very significant impact (5) 213 44 122 43 111 77 27 57 83 129 21 2 4 46 86 2914% 14% 14% 15% 12% 17% 16% 16% 16% 13% 19% 12% 10% 17% 12% 17%

D i N

4 (4) 395 82 246 59 216 130 40 118 158 237 30 4 12 88 174 3826% 25% 27% 20% 24% 28% 24% 32% 30% 23% 27% 25% 28% 32% 24% 22%

C FI I

3 (3) 344 75 186 78 202 108 36 77 114 230 23 4 8 63 171 4122% 23% 21% 27% 23% 23% 22% 21% 21% 23% 21% 22% 17% 23% 23% 24%

B

2 (2) 211 51 128 28 136 59 27 45 72 140 20 4 7 33 108 2214% 16% 14% 10% 15% 13% 16% 12% 14% 14% 18% 21% 17% 12% 15% 13%

C C

1 - No impact at all (1) 363 69 208 79 223 85 32 62 95 268 17 3 11 44 195 3724% 21% 23% 27% 25% 18% 20% 17% 18% 26% 15% 20% 25% 16% 26% 22%

a E FGH m

Don't know 17 3 12 3 6 6 3 6 8 9 1 - 1 3 4 31% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% 2%

NETS

Net: Some/ Significant impact 608 127 369 101 328 207 67 174 241 367 51 6 17 134 259 6839% 39% 41% 35% 37% 45% 41% 48% 46% 36% 45% 37% 38% 48% 35% 40%

c D fI I

Net: Little/ no impact 574 120 336 107 359 144 59 107 166 408 37 7 19 78 303 5937% 37% 37% 37% 40% 31% 36% 29% 31% 40% 33% 41% 42% 28% 41% 35%

E GH M

Mean score 2.92 2.95 2.94 2.85 2.84 3.12 3.01 3.17 3.12 2.82 3.16 2.87 2.80 3.21 2.79 3.00D i I I L n

Standard deviation 1.38 1.35 1.38 1.41 1.37 1.35 1.37 1.32 1.34 1.39 1.34 1.35 1.38 1.31 1.37 1.40Standard error .03 .08 .05 .08 .05 .06 .10 .06 .05 .04 .12 .28 .20 .07 .05 .11

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 67

Page 77: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 62/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE7_3. To what extent, if at all, would you say that the process of revalidation has had an impact on each of the following?

Your awareness of how to apply the principles of good medical practice to your workBase: All doctors who have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1581 289 917 348 893 522 195 424 619 962 137 23 50 329 706 170

Weighted Total 1543 324 902 288 896 466 164 364 529 1014 113 17 44 278 738 171100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

5 - A very significant impact (5) 137 28 78 29 61 64 15 56 71 66 12 3 4 47 45 149% 9% 9% 10% 7% 14% 9% 15% 13% 6% 11% 20% 9% 17% 6% 8%

D FI I

4 (4) 290 55 180 49 161 104 27 93 120 171 22 1 9 71 130 3219% 17% 20% 17% 18% 22% 16% 26% 23% 17% 19% 6% 21% 26% 18% 19%

D FI fI

3 (3) 395 90 220 79 247 102 49 89 139 256 36 4 12 68 198 3026% 28% 24% 28% 28% 22% 30% 24% 26% 25% 32% 23% 28% 25% 27% 18%

E O

2 (2) 233 47 139 43 144 68 26 45 71 162 17 5 7 33 120 3015% 15% 15% 15% 16% 15% 16% 12% 13% 16% 15% 28% 15% 12% 16% 18%

g

1 - No impact at all (1) 467 98 272 86 276 116 45 74 119 348 25 4 11 54 240 5930% 30% 30% 30% 31% 25% 27% 20% 22% 34% 22% 24% 24% 19% 33% 34%

E g fGH

Don't know 21 5 14 3 6 11 3 7 10 12 1 - 1 5 4 61% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% - 2% 2% 1% 4%

D N

NETS

Net: Some/ Significant impact 427 83 258 78 222 168 42 149 191 236 34 4 13 118 176 4628% 26% 29% 27% 25% 36% 25% 41% 36% 23% 30% 25% 30% 42% 24% 27%

D FI FI l

Net: Little/ no impact 700 146 411 128 420 185 70 119 190 510 42 9 17 87 360 8945% 45% 46% 44% 47% 40% 43% 33% 36% 50% 38% 52% 39% 31% 49% 52%

E Gh fGH

Mean score 2.60 2.59 2.61 2.62 2.54 2.85 2.64 3.03 2.91 2.45 2.80 2.70 2.75 3.09 2.48 2.46D i FI FI

Standard deviation 1.33 1.32 1.34 1.34 1.28 1.39 1.30 1.36 1.35 1.30 1.29 1.45 1.31 1.36 1.28 1.36Standard error .03 .08 .04 .07 .04 .06 .09 .07 .05 .04 .11 .30 .19 .08 .05 .11

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 68

Page 78: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 63/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE7_4. To what extent, if at all, would you say that the process of revalidation has had an impact on each of the following?

The extent to which you feel a part of a governed structure that supports your professional developmentBase: All doctors who have been revalidated

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1581 289 917 348 893 522 195 424 619 962 137 23 50 329 706 170

Weighted Total 1543 324 902 288 896 466 164 364 529 1014 113 17 44 278 738 171100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

5 - A very significant impact (5) 105 24 61 20 45 50 8 43 51 54 5 2 3 37 36 117% 7% 7% 7% 5% 11% 5% 12% 10% 5% 5% 13% 7% 13% 5% 7%

D FI FI

4 (4) 244 50 144 46 131 91 24 86 110 134 19 3 9 69 102 2016% 15% 16% 16% 15% 20% 15% 23% 21% 13% 17% 15% 21% 25% 14% 12%

D FI fI

3 (3) 416 87 250 75 249 128 44 97 141 275 32 2 10 76 207 5027% 27% 28% 26% 28% 28% 27% 27% 27% 27% 28% 13% 22% 27% 28% 29%

2 (2) 254 65 142 42 172 54 29 46 75 179 22 3 7 30 143 2116% 20% 16% 14% 19% 12% 18% 13% 14% 18% 20% 19% 15% 11% 19% 12%

bc E Gh O

1 - No impact at all (1) 474 86 276 100 277 123 53 76 129 345 30 7 14 53 233 6431% 27% 31% 35% 31% 26% 32% 21% 24% 34% 26% 39% 33% 19% 32% 37%

A e GH GH M

Don't know 50 12 30 7 23 19 6 17 23 27 5 - 1 14 17 63% 4% 3% 2% 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% 3% 4% - 2% 5% 2% 3%

d i i

NETS

Net: Some/ Significant impact 349 73 205 65 176 141 32 128 161 188 25 5 12 105 139 3123% 23% 23% 23% 20% 30% 20% 35% 30% 19% 22% 28% 28% 38% 19% 18%

D FI FI

Net: Little/ no impact 728 151 418 141 448 177 82 122 204 524 52 10 21 83 376 8447% 47% 46% 49% 50% 38% 50% 33% 39% 52% 46% 58% 48% 30% 51% 49%

E GH g GH M

Mean score 2.50 2.55 2.51 2.45 2.42 2.76 2.40 2.92 2.76 2.37 2.52 2.44 2.53 3.02 2.40 2.36D FhI FI L

Standard deviation 1.28 1.26 1.28 1.31 1.22 1.35 1.24 1.32 1.32 1.24 1.21 1.50 1.34 1.31 1.21 1.29Standard error .03 .08 .04 .07 .04 .06 .09 .07 .05 .04 .11 .31 .19 .07 .05 .10

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 69

Page 79: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 64/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE8_SUM. To what extent, if at all, would you say that having an annual appraisal has had an impact on each of the following?

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All doctors who have annual appraisals

NETS

Total5 - A very significant

impact 4 3 2 1 - No impact at all Don't knowSome/ Significant

impact Little/ no impact Mean

The amount of information you collect about your practice 2172 720 638 418 146 206 44 1358 352 3.71100% 33% 29% 19% 7% 9% 2% 63% 16%

How much time you spend reflecting on your practice 2172 418 595 532 210 377 39 1013 588 3.22100% 19% 27% 25% 10% 17% 2% 47% 27%

Your awareness of how to apply the principles of goodmedical practice to your work 2172 214 503 582 277 559 37 718 836 2.78

100% 10% 23% 27% 13% 26% 2% 33% 38%

The extent to which you feel a part of a governedstructure that supports your professional development 2172 237 456 574 296 542 67 693 838 2.79

100% 11% 21% 26% 14% 25% 3% 32% 39%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 70

Page 80: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 65/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE8_1. To what extent, if at all, would you say that having an annual appraisal has had an impact on each of the following?

The amount of information you collect about your practiceBase: All doctors who have annual appraisals

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2177 562 1177 408 1213 750 259 589 848 1329 185 31 67 465 961 254

Weighted Total 2172 646 1157 338 1244 693 222 517 739 1433 159 22 58 405 1027 267100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

5 - A very significant impact (5) 720 187 397 129 413 241 68 173 240 480 47 9 15 144 350 8833% 29% 34% 38% 33% 35% 30% 33% 32% 33% 30% 42% 26% 35% 34% 33%

A A

4 (4) 638 177 347 101 353 212 56 171 227 411 35 6 22 130 295 7529% 27% 30% 30% 28% 31% 25% 33% 31% 29% 22% 30% 38% 32% 29% 28%

Fi f

3 (3) 418 134 229 48 245 135 39 94 133 285 31 2 12 73 202 6019% 21% 20% 14% 20% 19% 17% 18% 18% 20% 20% 11% 21% 18% 20% 22%

C C

2 (2) 146 47 72 23 93 38 24 34 58 88 22 1 5 22 66 147% 7% 6% 7% 7% 6% 11% 7% 8% 6% 14% 6% 9% 6% 6% 5%

e GI

1 - No impact at all (1) 206 75 96 34 117 57 31 33 64 142 19 2 2 29 95 269% 12% 8% 10% 9% 8% 14% 6% 9% 10% 12% 11% 4% 7% 9% 10%

B GHI G

Don't know 44 26 15 2 25 10 5 12 17 27 4 - 2 6 19 32% 4% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% - 3% 2% 2% 1%

BC

NETS

Net: Some/ Significant impact 1358 364 744 230 765 453 124 343 467 891 83 16 37 274 645 16463% 56% 64% 68% 62% 65% 56% 66% 63% 62% 52% 72% 64% 68% 63% 61%

A A d Fi F F J

Net: Little/ no impact 352 122 169 57 210 95 55 67 122 230 41 4 7 52 161 4016% 19% 15% 17% 17% 14% 25% 13% 17% 16% 26% 17% 13% 13% 16% 15%

B e GHI g g

Mean score 3.71 3.57 3.77 3.80 3.70 3.79 3.48 3.82 3.72 3.71 3.45 3.85 3.76 3.85 3.73 3.71A A Fi F F

Standard deviation 1.27 1.31 1.23 1.30 1.27 1.22 1.40 1.17 1.25 1.27 1.37 1.36 1.09 1.19 1.26 1.26Standard error .03 .06 .04 .06 .04 .04 .09 .05 .04 .04 .10 .24 .13 .06 .04 .08

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 71

Page 81: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 66/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE8_2. To what extent, if at all, would you say that having an annual appraisal has had an impact on each of the following?

How much time you spend reflecting on your practiceBase: All doctors who have annual appraisals

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2177 562 1177 408 1213 750 259 589 848 1329 185 31 67 465 961 254

Weighted Total 2172 646 1157 338 1244 693 222 517 739 1433 159 22 58 405 1027 267100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

5 - A very significant impact (5) 418 117 236 60 220 160 41 115 156 262 31 4 7 101 182 5619% 18% 20% 18% 18% 23% 18% 22% 21% 18% 20% 17% 12% 25% 18% 21%

D I i L

4 (4) 595 169 335 84 336 199 57 161 218 378 38 5 18 123 279 7127% 26% 29% 25% 27% 29% 26% 31% 29% 26% 24% 24% 31% 30% 27% 27%

fI

3 (3) 532 169 284 72 305 174 50 125 175 357 36 7 16 98 253 6925% 26% 25% 21% 24% 25% 22% 24% 24% 25% 23% 32% 27% 24% 25% 26%

c

2 (2) 210 61 107 36 133 60 26 37 63 147 22 2 6 27 105 3110% 9% 9% 11% 11% 9% 12% 7% 9% 10% 14% 11% 10% 7% 10% 12%

G G

1 - No impact at all (1) 377 108 182 82 229 90 43 64 107 270 28 4 10 48 190 3817% 17% 16% 24% 18% 13% 20% 12% 14% 19% 18% 16% 17% 12% 19% 14%

AB E GH GH

Don't know 39 22 13 3 23 11 6 14 20 19 3 - 2 9 18 12% 3% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 1% 2% - 4% 2% 2% 1%

BC I I

NETS

Net: Some/ Significant impact 1013 286 571 144 555 359 98 276 374 639 69 9 25 223 461 12747% 44% 49% 43% 45% 52% 44% 53% 51% 45% 44% 41% 43% 55% 45% 48%

AC D FI fI l

Net: Little/ no impact 588 169 289 118 361 149 69 101 170 418 50 6 16 75 296 6927% 26% 25% 35% 29% 22% 31% 20% 23% 29% 31% 27% 27% 18% 29% 26%

AB E GH GH

Mean score 3.22 3.20 3.29 3.01 3.15 3.41 3.12 3.45 3.35 3.15 3.14 3.15 3.11 3.51 3.16 3.29C C D FI FI L

Standard deviation 1.35 1.33 1.33 1.44 1.35 1.30 1.39 1.27 1.32 1.36 1.38 1.31 1.28 1.27 1.35 1.32Standard error .03 .06 .04 .07 .04 .05 .09 .05 .05 .04 .10 .24 .16 .06 .04 .08

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 72

Page 82: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 67/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE8_3. To what extent, if at all, would you say that having an annual appraisal has had an impact on each of the following?

Your awareness of how to apply the principles of good medical practice to your workBase: All doctors who have annual appraisals

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2177 562 1177 408 1213 750 259 589 848 1329 185 31 67 465 961 254

Weighted Total 2172 646 1157 338 1244 693 222 517 739 1433 159 22 58 405 1027 267100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

5 - A very significant impact (5) 214 56 122 34 84 113 20 96 116 98 13 5 6 87 65 2210% 9% 11% 10% 7% 16% 9% 19% 16% 7% 9% 23% 10% 21% 6% 8%

D FI FI J L

4 (4) 503 149 276 71 283 182 51 141 192 311 38 3 16 112 229 6723% 23% 24% 21% 23% 26% 23% 27% 26% 22% 24% 14% 27% 28% 22% 25%

d I I

3 (3) 582 174 321 79 349 162 51 124 175 407 38 7 17 87 294 6927% 27% 28% 24% 28% 23% 23% 24% 24% 28% 24% 31% 29% 21% 29% 26%

c E fGH

2 (2) 277 88 133 52 172 79 33 52 84 193 25 2 8 40 138 3813% 14% 11% 15% 14% 11% 15% 10% 11% 13% 16% 8% 14% 10% 13% 14%

B g G

1 - No impact at all (1) 559 162 286 101 337 146 63 92 155 404 41 5 11 72 285 6926% 25% 25% 30% 27% 21% 28% 18% 21% 28% 26% 23% 18% 18% 28% 26%

aB E GH GH

Don't know 37 17 19 1 20 10 5 12 17 20 3 - 2 8 16 22% 3% 2% * 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% - 3% 2% 2% 1%

C c i

NETS

Net: Some/ Significant impact 718 206 398 104 367 295 71 237 308 410 52 8 21 198 294 8933% 32% 34% 31% 30% 43% 32% 46% 42% 29% 33% 37% 36% 49% 29% 33%

D FI FI l

Net: Little/ no impact 836 250 419 152 508 226 96 144 239 596 66 7 19 112 423 10738% 39% 36% 45% 41% 33% 43% 28% 32% 42% 42% 32% 32% 28% 41% 40%

AB E GH g GH

Mean score 2.78 2.76 2.84 2.66 2.68 3.05 2.69 3.19 3.04 2.65 2.74 3.06 2.95 3.25 2.65 2.75C D FHI FI l

Standard deviation 1.33 1.31 1.33 1.36 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.36 1.37 1.29 1.32 1.48 1.26 1.39 1.28 1.31Standard error .03 .06 .04 .07 .04 .05 .08 .06 .05 .04 .10 .26 .16 .06 .04 .08

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 73

Page 83: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 68/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsE8_4. To what extent, if at all, would you say that having an annual appraisal has had an impact on each of the following?

The extent to which you feel a part of a governed structure that supports your professional developmentBase: All doctors who have annual appraisals

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2177 562 1177 408 1213 750 259 589 848 1329 185 31 67 465 961 254

Weighted Total 2172 646 1157 338 1244 693 222 517 739 1433 159 22 58 405 1027 267100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

5 - A very significant impact (5) 237 68 133 36 110 113 20 86 106 131 12 4 6 78 93 3011% 11% 11% 11% 9% 16% 9% 17% 14% 9% 7% 19% 9% 19% 9% 11%

D FI FI J l

4 (4) 456 130 255 64 259 157 42 131 173 283 32 3 16 102 211 5121% 20% 22% 19% 21% 23% 19% 25% 23% 20% 20% 12% 27% 25% 21% 19%

FI I

3 (3) 574 194 307 65 323 187 56 133 189 385 43 6 13 102 268 8026% 30% 27% 19% 26% 27% 25% 26% 26% 27% 27% 27% 22% 25% 26% 30%

C C

2 (2) 296 80 151 56 194 72 32 54 86 210 26 2 9 37 159 3314% 12% 13% 17% 16% 10% 14% 10% 12% 15% 17% 8% 16% 9% 15% 12%

ab E GH m

1 - No impact at all (1) 542 151 274 110 317 149 62 93 155 387 37 7 13 73 267 6925% 23% 24% 33% 25% 21% 28% 18% 21% 27% 23% 32% 22% 18% 26% 26%

AB E GH GH

Don't know 67 22 37 7 41 17 11 19 30 37 8 * 2 13 31 33% 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 5% 4% 4% 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% 3% 1%

I i

NETS

Net: Some/ Significant impact 693 199 387 100 369 269 62 217 279 413 44 7 21 181 303 8232% 31% 33% 30% 30% 39% 28% 42% 38% 29% 28% 31% 37% 45% 30% 31%

D FI FI

Net: Little/ no impact 838 231 425 166 511 220 94 147 241 597 63 9 22 110 425 10239% 36% 37% 49% 41% 32% 42% 28% 33% 42% 40% 40% 38% 27% 41% 38%

AB E GH GH m

Mean score 2.79 2.82 2.84 2.57 2.71 3.02 2.66 3.13 2.99 2.68 2.70 2.77 2.86 3.19 2.70 2.78C C D FhI FI l

Standard deviation 1.34 1.31 1.34 1.40 1.31 1.37 1.34 1.34 1.36 1.32 1.27 1.53 1.33 1.36 1.31 1.34Standard error .03 .06 .04 .07 .04 .05 .09 .06 .05 .04 .10 .28 .17 .06 .04 .08

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 74

Page 84: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 69/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsF1. If a situation arose in which you believed that patient safety or care was being compromised by the practice of a colleague, which of the following would you go to / tell, if any?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

A senior colleague/ educational supervisor/ clinicalsupervisor 2045 680 1059 275 1161 676 200 503 703 1342 144 21 53 402 963 253

89% 94% 88% 79% 88% 91% 87% 91% 90% 88% 88% 88% 87% 92% 88% 91%BC C D fi

Would speak to the doctor myself 1317 405 686 205 744 419 123 305 429 889 81 14 36 237 627 16857% 56% 57% 59% 57% 57% 54% 55% 55% 58% 50% 57% 58% 54% 58% 60%

h

Your employer/ commissioning body 951 221 547 165 564 298 88 233 322 629 64 5 24 192 477 10141% 31% 46% 47% 43% 40% 38% 42% 41% 41% 39% 20% 39% 44% 44% 36%

A A K O

The GMC 693 181 387 117 407 213 64 189 253 440 43 9 23 151 341 5330% 25% 32% 34% 31% 29% 28% 34% 32% 29% 26% 37% 38% 35% 31% 19%

A A fI i O

A confidential Helpline (for example, NHS, GMC,other) 497 133 274 80 281 171 32 132 164 333 24 5 12 106 245 60

22% 18% 23% 23% 21% 23% 14% 24% 21% 22% 14% 20% 20% 24% 22% 21%A a F F F

Your Postgraduate Deanery/ Local Education andTraining Board 462 178 215 64 265 144 33 107 140 322 19 3 10 82 235 59

20% 25% 18% 18% 20% 19% 14% 19% 18% 21% 12% 11% 16% 19% 22% 21%BC f Fh

Your Medical College or Faculty 165 36 91 37 89 60 19 43 62 103 11 3 6 31 71 267% 5% 8% 11% 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% 7% 7% 12% 10% 7% 7% 9%

A AB

A central reporting system, for example, the NationalReporting and Learning System (NRLS) 146 48 82 16 58 72 11 53 64 82 7 1 4 45 47 26

6% 7% 7% 5% 4% 10% 5% 10% 8% 5% 4% 4% 6% 10% 4% 9%D FI fI N

Defence Union/ Indemnity organisation/ LMC/ BMA/MDU 66 9 40 18 48 9 7 6 12 54 6 - 2 4 40 5

3% 1% 3% 5% 4% 1% 3% 1% 2% 4% 4% - 3% 1% 4% 2%A Ab E g GH m

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 75

Page 85: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 69/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsF1. If a situation arose in which you believed that patient safety or care was being compromised by the practice of a colleague, which of the following would you go to / tell, if any?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

The National Clinical Assessment Centre 50 1 37 11 31 17 5 16 21 29 4 1 1 13 25 32% * 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 1%

A A

Depends on circumstances 27 4 18 5 23 2 1 1 1 26 1 - 1 - 21 21% 1% 2% 1% 2% * * * * 2% 1% - 1% - 2% 1%

a E fGH M

Discuss with colleagues 14 3 9 2 10 4 1 6 6 8 1 - 2 3 8 11% * 1% 1% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 1% 1% - 3% 1% 1% *

M

Difficult to say after Dr. Chris case/ Needwhistleblowing protection 9 4 4 1 4 1 1 1 2 6 - 1 1 - 2 -

* 1% * * * * * * * * - 4% 2% - * -J M

Many combinations of above 5 1 3 1 4 - 1 - 1 4 1 - - - 3 -* * * * * - * - * * 1% - - - * -

Internally/ Internal system/ Within organisation 2 - 2 - 1 - - 2 2 1 - - - - 1 -* - * - * - - * * * - - - - * -

NHS/ NHS England/ NHS Protect 2 - 1 1 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 -* - * * * - - - - * - - - - * -

Other 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 - - 1 1 -* * * * * * 1% * * * 1% - - * * -

I

None of these 8 2 5 1 2 1 1 1 2 6 - - - - 2 1* * * * * * * * * * - - - - * *

Don't know 16 9 5 1 4 7 - 4 4 12 - - - 3 4 41% 1% * * * 1% - 1% * 1% - - - 1% * 1%

b d N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 76

Page 86: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 70/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsF2. In the last 12 months has a situation arisen in which you believed that patient safety or care was being compromised by a doctor's practice? This could be about the doctor'sclinical skills, behaviours or health issuesBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 350 103 190 58 215 88 35 61 95 255 27 2 8 43 181 4415% 14% 16% 17% 16% 12% 15% 11% 12% 17% 16% 7% 12% 10% 17% 16%

E g GH

No 1861 583 963 283 1065 605 186 450 636 1225 131 21 48 362 885 22281% 81% 80% 81% 81% 82% 81% 81% 81% 80% 80% 86% 79% 83% 81% 80%

Can't remember 94 36 47 8 35 47 10 43 53 42 5 2 5 32 24 134% 5% 4% 2% 3% 6% 4% 8% 7% 3% 3% 8% 9% 7% 2% 5%

C D fI I N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 77

Page 87: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 71/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsF3. And in the last 12 months, have you raised any of your concerns about patient safety or care being compromised with any of the following?Base: All doctors who have been concerned about patient safety or care being compromised in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i *j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I *J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 356 87 199 70 212 99 39 72 111 245 29 3 9 52 174 44

Weighted Total 350 103 190 58 215 88 35 61 95 255 27 2 8 43 181 44100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

No - I have not raised these concerns with anybody 19 8 8 3 15 3 3 2 5 14 3 - - 1 12 25% 8% 4% 5% 7% 4% 9% 4% 6% 5% 11% - - 3% 6% 4%

A senior colleague / clinical supervisor/ educationalsupervisor 250 76 142 32 155 64 21 45 65 185 16 2 6 33 133 30

71% 74% 75% 55% 72% 73% 60% 74% 69% 72% 61% 100% 82% 77% 73% 68%C C

I spoke with the doctor myself 132 24 81 27 80 35 10 23 33 99 6 1 4 16 70 1838% 24% 42% 48% 37% 39% 28% 38% 35% 39% 24% 39% 54% 37% 39% 41%

A A

Your employer/ commissioning body 116 16 75 25 74 27 9 20 29 87 5 1 2 15 67 1133% 16% 39% 43% 34% 30% 26% 33% 30% 34% 19% 35% 21% 35% 37% 26%

A A

Your Postgraduate Deanery/ Local Education andTraining Board 30 3 20 7 16 11 - 6 6 24 - - 1 5 16 5

9% 3% 11% 12% 7% 12% - 11% 7% 9% - - 7% 12% 9% 12%A A F f F

The GMC 29 3 15 11 20 6 2 4 6 23 2 - 1 3 17 38% 3% 8% 19% 9% 7% 5% 7% 6% 9% 7% - 12% 7% 10% 7%

AB

A central reporting system, for example, the NationalReporting and Learning System (NRLS) 12 6 5 1 8 3 2 2 4 7 2 - - 2 6 1

3% 6% 3% 1% 4% 4% 6% 4% 5% 3% 8% - - 5% 3% 3%

The National Clinical Assessment Centre 6 - 5 1 6 1 * 1 1 5 * - - 1 5 -2% - 3% 2% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% - - 2% 3% -

A confidential Helpline (for example, NHS, GMC,other) 6 - 4 2 3 3 - 2 2 4 - - - 2 3 1

2% - 2% 4% 1% 4% - 3% 2% 2% - - - 5% 2% 3%a

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 78

Page 88: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 71/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsF3. And in the last 12 months, have you raised any of your concerns about patient safety or care being compromised with any of the following?Base: All doctors who have been concerned about patient safety or care being compromised in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i *j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I *J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 356 87 199 70 212 99 39 72 111 245 29 3 9 52 174 44

Weighted Total 350 103 190 58 215 88 35 61 95 255 27 2 8 43 181 44100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Your Medical College or Faculty 5 1 4 - 4 2 - - - 5 - - - - 4 22% 1% 2% - 2% 2% - - - 2% - - - - 2% 4%

Difficult to say after Dr. Chris case/ Needwhistleblowing protectionM 2 2 - - 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 -

* 2% - - 1% - - - - 1% - - - - 1% -b

NHS/ NHS England/ NHS Protect 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1 -* - 1% - 1% - - - - 1% - - - - 1% -

Discuss with colleagues 1 - 1 * 1 - * - * 1 * - - - 1 -* - * 1% 1% - 1% - * * 2% - - - * -

Other 4 - 3 1 2 - - 1 1 3 - - 1 - 1 -1% - 1% 2% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% - - 12% - 1% -

Can't remember 3 2 2 - 2 - 2 1 3 1 2 - - - 1 -1% 2% 1% - 1% - 5% 2% 3% * 7% - - - * -

I I

Would prefer not to say 12 6 4 3 3 6 1 3 4 8 - - - 2 3 44% 6% 2% 6% 1% 7% 2% 5% 4% 3% - - - 5% 2% 9%

b D N

NETS

Net: Raised any concerns 316 87 178 51 195 79 29 54 83 233 22 2 8 39 166 3890% 85% 93% 89% 91% 89% 84% 89% 87% 91% 82% 100% 100% 92% 92% 87%

A

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 79

Page 89: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 72/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsF4. Why did you not raise these concerns with a colleague or an external organisation?Base: All doctors who did not raise their concerns about patient safety or care being compromised

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 16 5 8 3 12 3 3 3 6 10 3 - - 2 9 1

Weighted Total 19 8 8 3 15 3 3 2 5 14 3 - - 1 12 2100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - - 100% 100% 100%

Incident/Issue was too minor 10 5 5 - 9 1 1 1 2 8 1 - - 1 8 -53% 60% 67% - 63% 25% 45% 33% 40% 58% 45% - - 62% 67% -

Reporting channels too punitive/not supportive 9 7 2 - 6 3 1 1 2 7 1 - - 1 6 248% 82% 30% - 44% 84% 27% 33% 30% 55% 27% - - 62% 48% 100%

Afraid of the impact on me/my career/workingrelationships with peers 8 5 3 * 8 * 1 * 1 7 1 - - * 7 -

43% 60% 35% 16% 52% 16% 27% 20% 24% 50% 27% - - 38% 58% -

Concerned about the welfare of the doctor inquestion/Did not want to make things worse 6 5 1 - 4 2 1 - 1 5 1 - - - 3 2

31% 60% 11% - 27% 59% 27% - 15% 37% 27% - - - 27% 100%

Was not sure of my suspicions 5 3 2 - 4 1 - 1 1 4 - - - 1 4 -27% 37% 26% - 29% 25% - 33% 15% 31% - - - 62% 36% -

Felt it would be disloyal to the doctor involved 4 3 1 - 2 2 1 - 1 3 1 - - - 2 222% 41% 11% - 16% 59% 27% - 15% 25% 27% - - - 13% 100%

Did not know how to, or who to report to 4 2 1 1 4 - 1 - 1 3 1 - - - 3 -20% 19% 11% 48% 27% - 27% - 15% 23% 27% - - - 26% -

Incident/Issue was a one-off 3 - 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 - 1 - - 1 - -14% - 21% 36% 5% 25% 27% 80% 51% - 27% - - 62% - -

Not my place to report concerns - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Other 2 - 2 - 2 - 1 - 1 1 1 - - - 1 -9% - 22% - 12% - 28% - 15% 6% 28% - - - 7% -

Don't know - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 80

Page 90: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 73/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsG1. This question is about the GMC's Fitness to Practise investigations. By this we mean the Fitness to Practise investigation that the GMC conducts into complaints made about doctors.This includes processes such as reviewing any documentary evidence, collecting witness statements, and obtaining reports from experts in clinical matters. This process does not includethe tribunal hearing (if required). This is covered in the next question. How confident, if at all, are you that the GMC's Fitness to Practise investigations produce fair outcomes for all groups of doctors?Would you say you are.Base: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 114 47 51 16 53 48 14 41 55 58 8 4 1 35 45 95% 7% 4% 5% 4% 7% 6% 7% 7% 4% 5% 15% 1% 8% 4% 3%

B D i I I J L

Fairly confident (3) 670 199 356 107 374 238 59 172 231 438 47 5 14 148 313 8429% 28% 30% 31% 28% 32% 26% 31% 30% 29% 29% 22% 23% 34% 29% 30%

d f l

Not very confident (2) 630 180 340 103 352 206 60 147 206 424 37 9 18 115 297 8227% 25% 28% 30% 27% 28% 26% 27% 26% 28% 23% 39% 29% 26% 27% 30%

J

Not at all confident (1) 425 116 224 72 252 103 44 74 118 307 24 5 15 46 213 5118% 16% 19% 21% 19% 14% 19% 13% 15% 20% 15% 22% 25% 11% 20% 18%

a E G GH M

Don't know 467 178 229 50 283 145 54 119 172 295 47 1 14 93 223 5220% 25% 19% 14% 22% 20% 23% 21% 22% 19% 29% 2% 22% 21% 20% 19%

BC C K

NETS

Net: Confident 783 246 407 123 427 286 73 214 287 497 55 9 15 183 358 9434% 34% 34% 35% 32% 39% 32% 39% 37% 33% 34% 37% 24% 42% 33% 34%

D FI i L

Net: Not confident 1056 297 564 175 604 309 104 221 325 731 61 15 33 161 510 13346% 41% 47% 50% 46% 42% 45% 40% 41% 48% 38% 61% 54% 37% 47% 48%

A A e GH J M

Mean score 2.26 2.33 2.24 2.22 2.22 2.39 2.24 2.42 2.37 2.20 2.33 2.31 2.00 2.50 2.22 2.23b D FI fI L

Standard deviation .88 .91 .87 .88 .87 .86 .92 .88 .90 .87 .88 1.00 .82 .85 .87 .84Standard error .02 .04 .03 .05 .03 .03 .06 .04 .03 .03 .08 .18 .11 .04 .03 .06

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 81

Page 91: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 74/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsG2. If the GMC concludes that a hearing is necessary it then refers the case to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) for a Fitness to Practise tribunal hearing tobe conducted. At these hearings a panel of medical and non-medical people hear evidence and decide whether a doctor's fitness to practise is impaired.How confident, if at all, are you that the Fitness to Practise tribunal hearings run by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) produce fair outcomes?Base: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very confident (4) 93 34 45 13 52 30 15 27 42 51 12 1 * 21 40 94% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 6% 5% 5% 3% 7% 5% 1% 5% 4% 3%

I I

Fairly confident (3) 643 197 338 102 351 233 52 164 216 427 37 6 14 141 299 8628% 27% 28% 29% 27% 32% 22% 30% 28% 28% 23% 26% 23% 32% 27% 31%

D F f f

Not very confident (2) 483 131 261 80 269 159 52 112 164 319 31 8 9 92 228 5821% 18% 22% 23% 20% 21% 23% 20% 21% 21% 19% 34% 15% 21% 21% 21%

a a J

Not at all confident (1) 343 94 178 66 209 76 33 54 87 256 18 3 13 33 178 4015% 13% 15% 19% 16% 10% 14% 10% 11% 17% 11% 12% 21% 8% 16% 14%

AB E g GH M

Don't know 744 265 378 87 433 242 79 197 276 468 65 5 24 150 344 8632% 37% 32% 25% 33% 33% 34% 36% 35% 31% 40% 22% 39% 34% 32% 31%

BC C I I k

NETS

Net: Confident 736 232 383 116 403 264 66 191 257 479 49 8 15 162 339 9532% 32% 32% 33% 31% 36% 29% 35% 33% 31% 30% 31% 24% 37% 31% 34%

D f L

Net: Not confident 826 224 439 146 478 234 85 166 251 575 49 11 22 126 407 9836% 31% 37% 42% 36% 32% 37% 30% 32% 38% 30% 47% 36% 29% 37% 35%

A Ab E G GH j

Mean score 2.31 2.38 2.30 2.24 2.28 2.44 2.32 2.46 2.42 2.26 2.43 2.31 2.06 2.52 2.27 2.33C D fI I L

Standard deviation .88 .89 .87 .89 .89 .82 .92 .84 .87 .88 .93 .84 .89 .79 .89 .85Standard error .02 .04 .03 .05 .03 .04 .07 .04 .04 .03 .09 .16 .14 .04 .03 .06

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 82

Page 92: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 75/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH1. Where would you go for advice or support on ethical and professional guidance relating to your practice?Base: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

A defence organisation, for example, the MedicalDefence Union, the Medical Protection Society or theMedical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland) 1926 600 1009 289 1115 597 163 446 608 1318 111 18 49 355 955 224

84% 83% 84% 83% 85% 81% 71% 81% 78% 87% 68% 73% 80% 81% 88% 80%E F F FGH O

A colleague 1590 498 824 242 927 491 136 343 480 1110 95 16 39 272 792 20369% 69% 69% 69% 70% 66% 59% 62% 61% 73% 58% 67% 64% 62% 73% 73%

e FGH

The British Medical Association (BMA) 1160 397 573 171 649 380 108 291 399 761 79 12 22 240 548 12850% 55% 48% 49% 49% 51% 47% 53% 51% 50% 48% 49% 35% 55% 50% 46%

Bc L

The GMC 804 231 443 122 435 291 90 240 330 473 66 9 22 196 347 8635% 32% 37% 35% 33% 39% 39% 43% 42% 31% 41% 39% 36% 45% 32% 31%

A D I I I

Your Medical College or Faculty 773 247 390 128 486 207 75 169 245 528 56 7 26 123 404 7634% 34% 32% 37% 37% 28% 33% 31% 31% 35% 34% 30% 43% 28% 37% 27%

E gh M O

A professional body other than the BMA 102 13 70 19 54 35 9 21 30 72 8 1 2 18 45 164% 2% 6% 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% 6%

A A

LMC 23 5 12 6 11 9 2 3 5 18 2 - - 3 9 61% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 2%

n

Specialist Society 11 2 5 4 8 1 - 1 1 10 - - - 1 8 -* * * 1% 1% * - * * 1% - - - * 1% -

a h

Ethics Committee/ Trust 7 1 4 2 3 2 - 1 1 6 - - - 1 3 1* * * 1% * * - * * * - - - * * *

Employer/Medical Supervisor/ Clinical Lead 7 - 4 2 6 - 2 - 2 5 1 - - - 5 -* - * 1% * - 1% - * * 1% - - - * -

A e G

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 83

Page 93: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 75/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH1. Where would you go for advice or support on ethical and professional guidance relating to your practice?Base: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

RCGP 6 1 4 1 4 1 1 1 2 4 1 - * * 2 1* * * * * * * * * * 1% - 1% * * *

HCSA 6 - 3 2 1 1 - 1 1 5 - - - 1 1 -* - * 1% * * - * * * - - - * * -

a

AAGBI 4 1 3 1 2 1 - 1 1 4 - - - 1 2 -* * * * * * - * * * - - - * * -

Other 21 1 13 7 15 4 1 4 6 15 1 - 2 2 12 11% * 1% 2% 1% * 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 3% 1% 1% *

A A M

Would not seek advice or support - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Don't know 22 7 12 3 13 5 3 7 10 12 2 - 3 3 8 11% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 5% 1% 1% *

M

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 84

Page 94: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 76/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH2_SUM. Please rank the following in terms of which you see as being the most important source of advice or support on ethical and professional guidance relating to your practice

RANKED 1ST SUMMARYBase: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

A defence organisation, for example, the MedicalDefence Union, the Medical Protection Society or theMedical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland) 924 291 465 149 529 290 71 215 287 637 47 9 23 173 459 108

40% 40% 39% 43% 40% 39% 31% 39% 37% 42% 29% 37% 37% 40% 42% 39%F f FH

A colleague 553 185 289 74 324 178 50 96 146 407 34 7 8 78 282 9324% 26% 24% 21% 25% 24% 22% 17% 19% 27% 21% 29% 13% 18% 26% 33%

fGH N

The GMC 427 128 238 59 223 164 53 152 205 222 40 5 16 123 167 3519% 18% 20% 17% 17% 22% 23% 27% 26% 15% 25% 22% 26% 28% 15% 13%

D I I I

Your Medical College or Faculty 187 55 88 39 120 45 23 34 58 129 17 1 6 27 97 168% 8% 7% 11% 9% 6% 10% 6% 7% 8% 11% 6% 9% 6% 9% 6%

aB E G g o

The British Medical Association (BMA) 166 50 94 16 89 51 26 46 72 94 20 1 5 31 64 197% 7% 8% 5% 7% 7% 11% 8% 9% 6% 12% 6% 9% 7% 6% 7%

C I i I

A professional body other than the BMA 13 2 7 3 6 7 1 2 4 9 1 - 1 2 4 61% * 1% 1% * 1% 1% * * 1% 1% - 1% * * 2%

N

Other 13 * 6 6 8 2 1 1 2 11 - * - - 8 11% * 1% 2% 1% * 1% * * 1% - 2% - - 1% *

AB j

Would not seek advice or support - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Don't know 22 7 12 3 13 5 3 7 10 12 2 - 3 3 8 11% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 5% 1% 1% *

M

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 85

Page 95: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 76/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH2_SUM. Please rank the following in terms of which you see as being the most important source of advice or support on ethical and professional guidance relating to your practice

RANKED 1ST SUMMARYBase: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

None of the above 3 2 2 - 3 - 2 - 2 2 2 - - - 2 -* * * - * - 1% - * * 1% - - - * -

GI

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 86

Page 96: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 77/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3_SUM. Over the past 12 months have you...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All Doctors

Total Yes No Don't know

Referred to GMC guidance (for example, Good Medical Practice,Consent, Confidentiality and other guidance) 2306 1313 941 52

100% 57% 41% 2%

Used the GMC Confidential Helpline to raise concerns about localstandards of practice 2306 16 2278 11

100% 1% 99% *

Spoken to the GMC expert advice team to ask questions aboutethical practice 2306 36 2260 10

100% 2% 98% *

Used the GMC Standards enquiry service to get written advice onethical issues 2306 29 2266 11

100% 1% 98% *

Used GMC online learning materials for example 'Good MedicalPractice in Action' interactive case studies 2306 529 1746 31

100% 23% 76% 1%

Attended a learning session run by the GMC to promote awarenessand understanding of its guidance 2306 140 2151 15

100% 6% 93% 1%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 87

Page 97: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 78/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3_SUM. Over the past 12 months have you...

YES SUMMARYBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Referred to GMC guidance (for example, GoodMedical Practice, Consent, Confidentiality and otherguidance) 1313 393 696 207 748 433 116 350 466 847 82 11 41 284 624 138

57% 55% 58% 59% 57% 59% 50% 63% 59% 56% 51% 46% 67% 65% 57% 50%FI Fi O

Used GMC online learning materials for example'Good Medical Practice in Action' interactive casestudies 529 146 282 91 278 193 66 181 247 282 47 5 18 151 213 38

23% 20% 23% 26% 21% 26% 29% 33% 32% 19% 29% 19% 29% 34% 20% 14%A D I I I O

Attended a learning session run by the GMC topromote awareness and understanding of itsguidance 140 52 56 29 74 56 16 47 63 77 11 2 4 41 59 14

6% 7% 5% 8% 6% 8% 7% 9% 8% 5% 6% 8% 6% 9% 5% 5%B B d I I

Spoken to the GMC expert advice team to askquestions about ethical practice 36 6 20 11 25 10 2 10 12 24 2 - 3 7 20 3

2% 1% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% - 5% 2% 2% 1%Ab m

Used the GMC Standards enquiry service to getwritten advice on ethical issues 29 11 14 5 15 13 5 12 17 12 5 - 3 8 7 5

1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% - 4% 2% 1% 2%I I I

Used the GMC Confidential Helpline to raiseconcerns about local standards of practice 16 5 6 5 7 7 1 6 7 9 1 - 1 4 5 3

1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% * 1%b

None of the above 837 285 425 111 491 246 91 155 247 591 64 11 17 112 410 12436% 39% 35% 32% 37% 33% 40% 28% 31% 39% 39% 46% 28% 26% 38% 44%

bC e GH GH N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 88

Page 98: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 79/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3_1. Over the past 12 months have you...

Referred to GMC guidance (for example, Good Medical Practice, Consent, Confidentiality and other guidance)Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 1313 393 696 207 748 433 116 350 466 847 82 11 41 284 624 13857% 55% 58% 59% 57% 59% 50% 63% 59% 56% 51% 46% 67% 65% 57% 50%

FI Fi O

No 941 313 474 138 546 286 107 185 292 649 73 13 20 136 453 13741% 43% 39% 40% 42% 39% 46% 33% 37% 43% 45% 54% 33% 31% 42% 49%

GH GH N

Don't know 52 15 30 3 20 21 8 19 26 25 8 - 1 18 12 32% 2% 2% 1% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 5% - 1% 4% 1% 1%

C D i I I

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 89

Page 99: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 80/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3_2. Over the past 12 months have you...

Used the GMC Confidential Helpline to raise concerns about local standards of practiceBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 16 5 6 5 7 7 1 6 7 9 1 - 1 4 5 31% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% * 1%

b

No 2278 709 1191 342 1305 726 229 543 772 1506 162 24 60 429 1083 27499% 98% 99% 98% 99% 98% 99% 98% 98% 99% 99% 98% 99% 98% 99% 98%

E o

Don't know 11 7 4 1 2 7 1 4 5 6 - 1 - 4 2 2* 1% * * * 1% * 1% 1% * - 2% - 1% * 1%

b D J

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 90

Page 100: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 81/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3_3. Over the past 12 months have you...

Spoken to the GMC expert advice team to ask questions about ethical practiceBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 36 6 20 11 25 10 2 10 12 24 2 - 3 7 20 32% 1% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% - 5% 2% 2% 1%

Ab m

No 2260 709 1177 337 1287 728 229 539 768 1492 161 24 57 428 1068 27698% 98% 98% 97% 98% 98% 99% 97% 98% 98% 99% 100% 94% 98% 98% 99%

c l

Don't know 10 6 3 1 3 2 - 4 4 6 - - 1 2 2 -* 1% * * * * - 1% 1% * - - 1% 1% * -

b

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 91

Page 101: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 82/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3_4. Over the past 12 months have you...

Used the GMC Standards enquiry service to get written advice on ethical issuesBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 29 11 14 5 15 13 5 12 17 12 5 - 3 8 7 51% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% - 4% 2% 1% 2%

I I I

No 2266 705 1183 343 1296 723 224 537 762 1505 158 24 58 426 1080 27498% 98% 99% 98% 99% 98% 97% 97% 97% 99% 97% 98% 94% 97% 99% 98%

FGH

Don't know 11 6 4 1 4 4 1 4 6 5 - 1 1 3 3 -* 1% * * * 1% 1% 1% 1% * - 2% 1% 1% * -

J

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 92

Page 102: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 83/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3_5. Over the past 12 months have you...

Used GMC online learning materials for example 'Good Medical Practice in Action' interactive case studiesBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 529 146 282 91 278 193 66 181 247 282 47 5 18 151 213 3823% 20% 23% 26% 21% 26% 29% 33% 32% 19% 29% 19% 29% 34% 20% 14%

A D I I I O

No 1746 566 899 255 1029 526 162 353 515 1231 113 20 44 269 872 23876% 79% 75% 73% 78% 71% 70% 64% 66% 81% 69% 81% 71% 61% 80% 85%

bC E g FGH N

Don't know 31 8 19 2 8 20 3 19 22 9 3 - - 18 5 21% 1% 2% 1% 1% 3% 1% 3% 3% 1% 2% - - 4% * 1%

D fI I l

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 93

Page 103: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 84/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3_6. Over the past 12 months have you...

Attended a learning session run by the GMC to promote awareness and understanding of its guidanceBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 140 52 56 29 74 56 16 47 63 77 11 2 4 41 59 146% 7% 5% 8% 6% 8% 7% 9% 8% 5% 6% 8% 6% 9% 5% 5%

B B d I I

No 2151 663 1138 317 1236 676 214 498 712 1439 153 22 56 389 1027 26593% 92% 95% 91% 94% 91% 93% 90% 91% 95% 94% 92% 92% 89% 94% 95%

AC E GH

Don't know 15 6 6 3 5 7 1 8 9 6 - - 1 7 4 -1% 1% * 1% * 1% * 1% 1% * - - 1% 2% * -

d I I

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 94

Page 104: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 85/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3A_SUM. To what extent, if at all...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All who have used each form of ethical and professional guidance

NETS Total Very helpful Fairly helpful Not very helpful Not at all helpful Don't know Helpful Not helpful Mean

was the GMC guidance helpful 1313 284 816 109 18 86 1100 126 3.11100% 22% 62% 8% 1% 7% 84% 10%

were the GMC online learning materials you used helpful 529 135 329 36 4 25 464 40 3.18100% 25% 62% 7% 1% 5% 88% 8%

was the GMC learning session you attended helpful 140 54 63 15 4 5 116 19 3.23100% 38% 45% 11% 3% 3% 83% 13%

was the response you received from the GMC expert adviceteam helpful 36 14 6 6 8 3 20 13 2.80

100% 39% 18% 15% 21% 7% 56% 36%

was the written advice you obtained from the GMC'sStandards enquiry service helpful 29 6 15 3 3 1 21 6 2.92

100% 22% 52% 11% 10% 5% 74% 21%

was the advice you obtained from the GMC ConfidentialHelpline helpful 16 2 3 3 6 3 4 9 2.03

100% 10% 17% 18% 35% 20% 27% 53%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 95

Page 105: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 86/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3A_1. To what extent, if at all, was the GMC guidance helpful? Would you say...Base: All who have Referred to GMC guidance (for example, Good Medical Practice, Consent, Confidentiality and other guidance)

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1308 349 698 248 721 469 134 390 524 784 97 16 45 317 579 136

Weighted Total 1313 393 696 207 748 433 116 350 466 847 82 11 41 284 624 138100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very helpful (4) 284 68 166 46 157 101 40 106 146 138 29 6 12 85 115 1022% 17% 24% 22% 21% 23% 35% 30% 31% 16% 35% 57% 30% 30% 18% 7%

A I I I O

Fairly helpful (3) 816 255 436 118 473 266 61 204 265 551 43 4 25 167 405 9562% 65% 63% 57% 63% 61% 53% 58% 57% 65% 52% 38% 61% 59% 65% 69%

C FGH

Not very helpful (2) 109 42 43 20 63 29 9 14 23 86 7 - 1 11 55 188% 11% 6% 10% 8% 7% 8% 4% 5% 10% 8% - 1% 4% 9% 13%

B b GH

Not at all helpful (1) 18 3 7 8 13 3 1 1 2 16 1 - - 1 12 21% 1% 1% 4% 2% 1% 1% * * 2% 1% - - * 2% 1%

AB GH

Don't know 86 24 44 15 42 34 5 24 29 57 3 1 3 21 36 137% 6% 6% 7% 6% 8% 4% 7% 6% 7% 3% 5% 7% 7% 6% 9%

NETS

Net: Helpful 1100 323 602 164 630 368 101 310 411 689 72 11 37 251 521 10584% 82% 86% 79% 84% 85% 87% 89% 88% 81% 87% 95% 92% 89% 83% 76%

aC i I I o

Net: Unhelpful 126 45 50 27 76 32 9 16 25 101 8 - 1 12 68 2010% 12% 7% 13% 10% 7% 8% 4% 5% 12% 9% - 1% 4% 11% 14%

B B GH

Mean score 3.11 3.05 3.17 3.06 3.10 3.17 3.27 3.27 3.27 3.03 3.26 3.60 3.31 3.27 3.06 2.91AC d I I I O

Standard deviation .60 .58 .58 .71 .61 .57 .63 .56 .58 .60 .65 .52 .50 .55 .61 .53Standard error .02 .03 .02 .05 .02 .03 .06 .03 .03 .02 .07 .13 .08 .03 .03 .05

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 96

Page 106: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 87/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3A_2. To what extent, if at all, was the advice you obtained from the GMC Confidential Helpline helpful? Would you say...Base: All who have Used the GMC Confidential Helpline to raise concerns about local standards of practice

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 17 5 7 5 8 7 2 6 8 9 2 - 1 4 5 3

Weighted Total 16 5 6 5 7 7 1 6 7 9 1 - 1 4 5 3100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very helpful (4) 2 - 2 - - 2 - 2 2 - - - - 2 - -10% - 26% - - 23% - 29% 23% - - - - 39% - -

Fairly helpful (3) 3 1 1 1 2 1 - 1 1 2 - - - 1 2 -17% 20% 18% 12% 25% 14% - 18% 14% 19% - - - 25% 38% -

Not very helpful (2) 3 2 - 1 1 2 - 1 1 1 - - - 1 1 118% 40% - 20% 14% 28% - 26% 21% 16% - - - 36% 21% 18%

Not at all helpful (1) 6 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 4 1 - 1 - 1 135% 18% 37% 49% 37% 21% 63% 16% 25% 42% 63% - 100% - 17% 50%

Don't know 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 - - - 1 120% 22% 18% 19% 24% 13% 37% 11% 16% 23% 37% - - - 24% 33%

NETS

Net: Helpful 4 1 3 1 2 3 - 3 3 2 - - - 3 2 -27% 20% 44% 12% 25% 38% - 47% 38% 19% - - - 64% 38% -

Net: Unhelpful 9 3 2 3 4 3 1 2 3 5 1 - 1 1 2 253% 57% 37% 69% 51% 49% 63% 42% 46% 58% 63% - 100% 36% 38% 67%

Mean score 2.03 2.03 2.41 1.55 1.85 2.46 1.00 2.68 2.43 1.71 1.00 - 1.00 3.03 2.28 1.26Standard deviation 1.11 .81 1.49 .86 .99 1.23 - 1.23 1.30 .90 - - - 1.00 .95 .63Standard error .31 .40 .67 .43 .40 .50 - .55 .53 .34 - - - .50 .47 .44

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 97

Page 107: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 88/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3A_3. To what extent, if at all, was the response you received from the GMC expert advice team helpful? Would you say...Base: All who have Spoken to the GMC expert advice team to ask questions about ethical practice

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 40 6 22 12 27 12 3 12 15 25 3 - 3 9 21 3

Weighted Total 36 6 20 11 25 10 2 10 12 24 2 - 3 7 20 3100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very helpful (4) 14 1 9 4 13 1 - 3 3 11 - - 1 1 11 -39% 19% 43% 41% 50% 15% - 25% 21% 47% - - 35% 21% 57% -

Fairly helpful (3) 6 1 3 2 2 4 - 4 4 2 - - - 4 2 -18% 18% 15% 22% 10% 41% - 40% 33% 10% - - - 57% 12% -

Not very helpful (2) 6 2 4 - 4 2 - 3 3 3 - - 1 2 3 115% 34% 18% - 14% 21% - 26% 21% 13% - - 34% 22% 13% 19%

Not at all helpful (1) 8 1 4 3 5 1 2 1 3 5 2 - 1 - 2 121% 16% 18% 29% 18% 15% 100% 9% 24% 19% 100% - 30% - 8% 54%

Don't know 3 1 1 1 2 1 - - - 3 - - - - 2 17% 13% 5% 8% 8% 7% - - - 11% - - - - 10% 27%

NETS

Net: Helpful 20 2 12 7 15 6 - 7 7 14 - - 1 6 14 -56% 37% 58% 63% 60% 56% - 66% 54% 57% - - 35% 78% 69% -

Net: Unhelpful 13 3 7 3 8 4 2 3 5 8 2 - 2 2 4 236% 50% 36% 29% 32% 36% 100% 34% 46% 32% 100% - 65% 22% 21% 73%

Mean score 2.80 2.45 2.88 2.81 2.99 2.61 1.00 2.82 2.51 2.96 1.00 - 2.41 2.99 3.31 1.26Standard deviation 1.22 1.14 1.21 1.37 1.25 1.00 - .96 1.12 1.27 - - 1.54 .71 1.05 .63Standard error .20 .51 .26 .41 .25 .30 - .28 .29 .27 - - .89 .24 .24 .44

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 98

Page 108: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 89/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3A_4. To what extent, if at all, was the written advice you obtained from the GMC's Standards enquiry service helpful? Would you say...Base: All who have Used the GMC Standards enquiry service to get written advice on ethical issues

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 29 10 14 5 15 13 7 12 19 10 7 - 2 9 6 4

Weighted Total 29 11 14 5 15 13 5 12 17 12 5 - 3 8 7 5100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very helpful (4) 6 1 4 1 4 3 2 4 5 1 2 - 1 3 1 -22% 10% 30% 29% 24% 22% 32% 33% 33% 8% 32% - 39% 35% 13% -

Fairly helpful (3) 15 5 6 3 10 4 2 5 8 7 2 - 2 3 6 152% 52% 46% 71% 67% 31% 42% 46% 45% 63% 42% - 61% 35% 87% 25%

Not very helpful (2) 3 3 - - - 3 - 1 1 2 - - - 1 - 211% 30% - - - 25% - 9% 7% 18% - - - 14% - 44%

Not at all helpful (1) 3 1 2 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - - - - 110% 8% 14% - 9% 11% 26% - 8% 12% 26% - - - - 31%

Don't know 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -5% - 10% - - 11% - 12% 8% - - - - 17% - -

NETS

Net: Helpful 21 7 10 5 13 7 4 9 13 8 4 - 3 6 7 174% 61% 76% 100% 91% 53% 74% 79% 77% 70% 74% - 100% 70% 100% 25%

Net: Unhelpful 6 4 2 - 1 5 1 1 2 4 1 - - 1 - 421% 39% 14% - 9% 36% 26% 9% 14% 30% 26% - - 14% - 75%

Mean score 2.92 2.63 3.02 3.29 3.06 2.72 2.80 3.27 3.12 2.65 2.80 - 3.39 3.26 3.13 1.94Standard deviation .88 .81 1.02 .51 .79 1.02 1.29 .67 .90 .82 1.29 - .62 .78 .36 .84Standard error .17 .26 .28 .23 .21 .29 .49 .20 .21 .26 .49 - .44 .27 .15 .42

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 99

Page 109: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 90/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3A_5. To what extent, if at all, were the GMC online learning materials you used helpful? Would you say...Base: All who have Used GMC online learning materials for example 'Good Medical Practice in Action' interactive case studies

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 552 134 299 111 281 221 74 206 280 272 55 5 19 174 207 42

Weighted Total 529 146 282 91 278 193 66 181 247 282 47 5 18 151 213 38100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very helpful (4) 135 30 78 27 68 55 22 56 77 58 16 4 6 46 46 525% 20% 28% 29% 24% 28% 33% 31% 31% 20% 34% 79% 34% 31% 22% 13%

a I I I

Fairly helpful (3) 329 94 176 48 179 114 40 107 147 182 28 1 11 90 140 2362% 64% 63% 53% 64% 59% 61% 59% 60% 64% 59% 21% 64% 60% 65% 60%

c c

Not very helpful (2) 36 15 11 10 20 9 3 8 11 25 2 - 1 6 17 37% 10% 4% 11% 7% 5% 4% 5% 4% 9% 4% - 3% 4% 8% 8%

B B gH

Not at all helpful (1) 4 * 3 1 2 1 1 - 1 3 1 - - - 2 11% * 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - * 1% 1% - - - 1% 4%

Don't know 25 7 13 5 10 14 1 10 11 14 1 - - 8 9 65% 5% 5% 5% 3% 7% 1% 6% 4% 5% 2% - - 5% 4% 15%

d N

NETS

Net: Helpful 464 124 255 75 246 169 62 163 225 239 44 5 17 136 185 2888% 85% 90% 83% 89% 87% 94% 90% 91% 85% 93% 100% 97% 90% 87% 73%

aC I I O

Net: Unhelpful 40 15 14 11 22 11 3 8 11 29 2 - 1 6 19 58% 11% 5% 12% 8% 6% 5% 5% 5% 10% 5% - 3% 4% 9% 12%

B B GH

Mean score 3.18 3.10 3.23 3.18 3.16 3.24 3.27 3.28 3.28 3.10 3.27 3.79 3.31 3.28 3.12 2.97A I I I

Standard deviation .58 .57 .57 .66 .58 .58 .59 .55 .56 .59 .61 .46 .54 .54 .57 .67Standard error .03 .05 .03 .06 .04 .04 .07 .04 .03 .04 .08 .21 .12 .04 .04 .11

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 100

Page 110: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 91/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH3A_6. To what extent, if at all, was the GMC learning session you attended helpful? Would you say...Base: All who have Attended a learning session run by the GMC to promote awareness and understanding of its guidance

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e *f g h i *j *k *l m n *oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E *F G H I *J *K *L M N *O

Unweighted Total 160 52 71 36 83 67 19 55 74 86 13 3 5 47 65 17

Weighted Total 140 52 56 29 74 56 16 47 63 77 11 2 4 41 59 14100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very helpful (4) 54 17 27 8 21 30 5 26 31 23 3 1 1 22 16 738% 32% 48% 27% 29% 54% 31% 54% 48% 30% 33% 73% 37% 54% 27% 49%

aC D I I

Fairly helpful (3) 63 24 22 17 39 17 10 18 28 35 6 1 2 15 30 245% 45% 39% 58% 53% 31% 65% 37% 44% 46% 61% 27% 50% 37% 51% 12%

b E

Not very helpful (2) 15 8 3 3 11 4 1 1 2 13 1 - 1 1 10 311% 16% 6% 10% 15% 7% 4% 2% 3% 17% 6% - 13% 2% 17% 23%

b GH

Not at all helpful (1) 4 2 1 1 2 1 - - - 4 - - - - 2 13% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% - - - 5% - - - - 4% 11%

gh

Don't know 5 2 2 1 * 4 - 3 3 2 - - - 3 * 13% 3% 4% 2% 1% 6% - 6% 4% 2% - - - 7% 1% 5%

d

NETS

Net: Helpful 116 41 49 25 60 48 15 43 58 58 10 2 3 37 47 883% 78% 88% 85% 81% 84% 96% 92% 93% 76% 94% 100% 87% 91% 79% 61%

I I

Net: Unhelpful 19 10 5 4 13 5 1 1 2 17 1 - 1 1 12 513% 19% 8% 13% 18% 9% 4% 2% 3% 22% 6% - 13% 2% 21% 33%

b GH

Mean score 3.23 3.11 3.39 3.11 3.08 3.45 3.27 3.55 3.48 3.03 3.27 3.73 3.24 3.57 3.03 3.06Ac D I I

Standard deviation .75 .79 .73 .70 .75 .75 .54 .55 .56 .83 .59 .64 .77 .54 .78 1.14Standard error .06 .11 .09 .12 .08 .09 .12 .08 .07 .09 .16 .37 .35 .08 .10 .29

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 101

Page 111: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 92/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH4. Which of the following types of support on ethical questions and dilemmas that arise in your work would you like the GMC to provide?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

A telephone advice line 1317 375 722 203 728 457 120 348 468 850 83 15 34 280 612 16357% 52% 60% 58% 55% 62% 52% 63% 60% 56% 51% 61% 55% 64% 56% 58%

A A D FI Fi

Case studies (to provide examples of the correctcourse of action to take in various circumstances) 1161 348 632 167 650 392 119 297 416 746 84 12 29 239 536 140

50% 48% 53% 48% 49% 53% 51% 54% 53% 49% 51% 52% 48% 55% 49% 50%ac i i

Flow charts to aid in a decision making process 1017 365 523 114 551 383 88 290 378 639 60 12 21 249 470 12244% 51% 44% 33% 42% 52% 38% 52% 48% 42% 37% 49% 34% 57% 43% 44%

BC C D FI FI L

Interactive resources on the GMC's website 985 283 544 145 528 367 96 289 385 600 73 9 29 235 426 12443% 39% 45% 41% 40% 50% 41% 52% 49% 39% 45% 36% 48% 54% 39% 44%

A D FI FI

Online FAQs 947 341 470 128 541 320 82 241 323 624 64 8 28 192 449 12041% 47% 39% 37% 41% 43% 36% 44% 41% 41% 39% 32% 46% 44% 41% 43%

BC F f f

A mobile app 666 279 329 52 304 297 63 232 296 371 47 9 19 195 238 9329% 39% 27% 15% 23% 40% 27% 42% 38% 24% 29% 36% 32% 45% 22% 34%

BC C D FhI FI L N

A written advice service (where queries received inwriting are replied to - again in writing) 614 174 330 105 304 238 63 188 252 362 43 6 16 151 245 81

27% 24% 27% 30% 23% 32% 27% 34% 32% 24% 26% 24% 26% 35% 22% 29%A D FI I N

A presentation on the subject, provided locally, thatyou could attend 585 155 321 100 272 258 57 198 254 331 38 8 17 165 217 84

25% 21% 27% 29% 21% 35% 25% 36% 32% 22% 23% 34% 28% 38% 20% 30%A A D FI FI l N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 102

Page 112: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 92/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH4. Which of the following types of support on ethical questions and dilemmas that arise in your work would you like the GMC to provide?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Don't trust GMC/ Don't expect anything from them/Not an appropriate body to provide advice 14 3 7 3 9 - - 1 1 13 - - 1 - 8 -

1% * 1% 1% 1% - - * * 1% - - 1% - 1% -E gH M

Email based advice system 11 1 8 1 9 1 - * * 10 - - - * 9 ** * 1% * 1% * - * * 1% - - - * 1% *

e gH

Online advice/ webchat/ Online guidance booklets 10 2 4 3 5 3 1 3 4 6 - - 1 2 5 1* * * 1% * * * 1% * * - - 1% 1% * *

a

Provide whistleblowing protection 5 4 1 - 4 - - - - 5 - - - - 4 -* 1% * - * - - - - * - - - - * -

b h

Access to local representative/ Senior doctor/ expertwith whom I can discuss issues 5 1 2 2 3 2 * 2 2 3 - * - 2 3 -

* * * 1% * * * * * * - 2% - * * -j

Patient information leaflets/ Communication withpublic regarding issues in current practice 4 1 2 * 4 - 2 - 2 2 2 - - - 2 -

* * * * * - 1% - * * 1% - - - * -GI

Workshops 2 - 1 1 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 -* - * * * - - - - * - - - - * -

Other 7 1 3 2 1 1 1 - 1 5 - 1 - - 1 -* * * 1% * * 1% - * * - 3% - - * -

g J

None 8 3 3 2 7 - 1 - 1 7 - - - - 7 -* * * * 1% - 1% - * * - - - - 1% -

E g g

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 103

Page 113: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 92/3

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH4. Which of the following types of support on ethical questions and dilemmas that arise in your work would you like the GMC to provide?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Don't know 184 52 92 34 119 35 18 26 43 141 13 2 7 15 100 188% 7% 8% 10% 9% 5% 8% 5% 6% 9% 8% 8% 11% 3% 9% 7%

E g GH M

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 104

Page 114: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 93/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH5_SUM. Please rank the list of types of support on ethical questions and dilemmas that arise in your work that you would like the GMC to provide with 1 being the most importantfor the GMC to provide to the least important for the GMC to provide.

RANKED 1ST SUMMARYBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

A telephone advice line 794 195 450 135 452 254 80 196 276 518 51 11 20 155 380 8934% 27% 38% 39% 34% 34% 35% 35% 35% 34% 31% 44% 33% 35% 35% 32%

A A

Flow charts to aid in a decision making process 248 106 108 28 151 80 21 62 84 164 18 1 5 53 127 2511% 15% 9% 8% 11% 11% 9% 11% 11% 11% 11% 4% 9% 12% 12% 9%

BC

Interactive resources on the GMC's website 215 48 129 36 134 67 19 60 79 136 16 - 8 47 110 209% 7% 11% 10% 10% 9% 8% 11% 10% 9% 10% - 14% 11% 10% 7%

A A k

A mobile app 200 111 80 8 99 82 20 59 79 121 17 2 6 48 76 329% 15% 7% 2% 8% 11% 9% 11% 10% 8% 10% 9% 10% 11% 7% 12%

BC C D i i N

Case studies (to provide examples of the correctcourse of action to take in various circumstances) 188 65 95 26 92 74 23 43 66 122 13 6 3 35 76 33

8% 9% 8% 7% 7% 10% 10% 8% 8% 8% 8% 24% 4% 8% 7% 12%D J N

Online FAQs 178 72 81 21 114 50 17 37 54 123 15 1 4 28 95 218% 10% 7% 6% 9% 7% 8% 7% 7% 8% 9% 4% 7% 6% 9% 7%

BC

A written advice service (where queries received inwriting are replied to - again in writing) 132 28 72 33 64 43 17 37 53 79 12 - 3 29 50 14

6% 4% 6% 9% 5% 6% 7% 7% 7% 5% 7% - 4% 7% 5% 5%a AB

A presentation on the subject, provided locally, thatyou could attend 113 25 67 18 54 49 14 30 44 68 9 1 3 25 42 23

5% 4% 6% 5% 4% 7% 6% 5% 6% 4% 5% 5% 5% 6% 4% 8%A D N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 105

Page 115: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 93/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH5_SUM. Please rank the list of types of support on ethical questions and dilemmas that arise in your work that you would like the GMC to provide with 1 being the most importantfor the GMC to provide to the least important for the GMC to provide.

RANKED 1ST SUMMARYBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Other 42 13 21 6 27 6 * 3 4 38 - * 1 2 26 32% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% * 1% * 3% - 2% 2% * 2% 1%

E FGH j m

Don't know 184 52 92 34 119 35 18 26 43 141 13 2 7 15 100 188% 7% 8% 10% 9% 5% 8% 5% 6% 9% 8% 8% 11% 3% 9% 7%

E g GH M

None of the above 12 6 3 3 8 - 1 - 1 11 - - - - 8 -1% 1% * 1% 1% - 1% - * 1% - - - - 1% -

E g Gh

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 106

Page 116: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 94/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH6. Which ethical challenges, if any, do you feel you are facing within your practice currently?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Being ethical in providing care/ working in bestinterest and capacity 207 50 115 38 126 53 18 33 52 155 14 - 5 24 107 28

9% 7% 10% 11% 10% 7% 8% 6% 7% 10% 8% - 9% 6% 10% 10%a A E GH k

Workload/ high work Pressure/ Increasing demand/demographic issues/ ageing population/ Increasingworkload/ work life balance issues/ high burnout rate/reduced time to complete tasks 158 31 95 30 113 23 12 13 25 133 9 - 1 10 102 13

7% 4% 8% 9% 9% 3% 5% 2% 3% 9% 6% - 2% 2% 9% 5%A A E G fGH O

Lack of support staff/ Falling work force/ Lack ofDoctors 141 32 82 26 101 24 7 16 23 118 2 1 3 13 97 10

6% 4% 7% 8% 8% 3% 3% 3% 3% 8% 1% 2% 4% 3% 9% 4%A A E FGH O

Increased expectations of patients/ changingrelationship between doctors and patients/ PatientsComplaints 100 27 56 14 62 24 9 14 23 77 3 1 4 10 55 13

4% 4% 5% 4% 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 5% 2% 3% 6% 2% 5% 5%GH m

Time constraints to safely provide care to eachpatient/ patient safety 92 22 44 26 62 16 5 7 12 80 2 - 3 4 57 12

4% 3% 4% 7% 5% 2% 2% 1% 2% 5% 1% - 5% 1% 5% 4%AB E FGH M

Ceiling of treatment/ DNACPR 80 26 45 8 48 25 4 15 20 60 4 - - 14 44 103% 4% 4% 2% 4% 3% 2% 3% 2% 4% 3% - - 3% 4% 4%

fh

Consent 73 29 32 12 52 17 5 14 19 55 4 - 2 11 45 73% 4% 3% 3% 4% 2% 2% 3% 2% 4% 2% - 4% 2% 4% 2%

E

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 107

Page 117: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 94/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH6. Which ethical challenges, if any, do you feel you are facing within your practice currently?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

End of life care 72 21 35 15 46 17 2 11 13 59 2 - 1 7 44 103% 3% 3% 4% 4% 2% 1% 2% 2% 4% 1% - 1% 2% 4% 4%

FGH

Funding constraints 65 9 33 18 43 9 5 8 13 52 2 - 4 4 37 53% 1% 3% 5% 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% - 6% 1% 3% 2%

A AB E GH M

Mental Capacity/ Patient's Capacity 55 16 31 9 38 12 6 9 15 40 6 - 1 8 31 42% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% - 2% 2% 3% 1%

e

Resource allocation 47 12 23 11 32 7 1 3 4 44 * - 1 2 31 52% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% * * * 3% * - 1% * 3% 2%

E FGH

Confidentiality (doctor - patient) 46 17 21 8 36 8 * 7 8 39 * - 1 5 35 32% 2% 2% 2% 3% 1% * 1% 1% 3% * - 2% 1% 3% 1%

E FgH o

Political pressure on doctors to meet demands of thepopulation/ within budgets 43 5 30 5 30 7 3 3 6 36 2 - 3 - 25 7

2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% - 5% - 2% 2%A E GH M

Whistle blowing protection/ indemnity/ raisingconcerns without it being detrimental to employment/Chris Day case 39 19 16 4 26 10 4 4 9 31 4 * 1 1 21 8

2% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% * 2% 3%Bc Gh M

GMC or regulatory pressure on doctors 28 7 13 7 22 4 3 4 7 21 3 - 2 2 17 21% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 3% 1% 2% 1%

E m

Hostile work environment 28 7 13 7 20 6 5 3 7 20 5 - 1 1 14 51% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% * 1% 1% 3% - 2% * 1% 2%

G g M

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 108

Page 118: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 94/3

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH6. Which ethical challenges, if any, do you feel you are facing within your practice currently?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Treatment and management of critically ill andvulnerable children 26 6 13 6 17 7 1 5 6 20 1 - - 4 16 3

1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 1% * - - 1% 1% 1%

Too much bureaucracy on a day-to-day basis 26 7 13 4 20 3 1 6 7 18 * - 3 3 16 11% 1% 1% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 1% 1% * - 5% 1% 1% *

E M o

Treatment of elderly patients with multiple ailments 25 8 13 4 14 7 4 8 11 14 3 - 1 5 11 21% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% 1%

Interpersonal issues with colleagues 24 3 17 4 10 8 2 6 8 15 2 - - 5 8 41% * 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 1%

a

Too much bureaucracy on a political/ regulatory level 21 2 13 5 16 1 2 1 3 18 1 - 1 - 14 11% * 1% 1% 1% * 1% * * 1% 1% - 2% - 1% 1%

A A E g Gh M

Professional development issues/ complex andbiased appraisal methods/ reduced time for CPD 16 - 7 7 12 2 2 2 4 12 1 - - 2 12 -

1% - 1% 2% 1% * 1% * 1% 1% 1% - - * 1% -a AB e o

Difficulty in communicating with non Englishspeaking people/ Emigrants 13 4 7 3 9 3 - 2 2 11 - - 1 2 9 2

1% 1% 1% 1% 1% * - * * 1% - - 1% * 1% 1%

New junior doctor's contract 12 7 5 - 8 4 - 2 2 10 - - - 2 8 21% 1% * - 1% * - * * 1% - - - * 1% 1%

C

Training/ Training Times/ Training for longer period 9 2 7 - 7 1 - 2 2 7 - - * 1 7 -* * 1% - 1% * - * * * - - 1% * 1% -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 109

Page 119: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 94/4

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsH6. Which ethical challenges, if any, do you feel you are facing within your practice currently?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Privatisation and fragmentation of NHS 5 1 1 3 1 1 - * * 4 - - - * 1 ** * * 1% * * - * * * - - - * * *

B

Industrial action 2 * - 1 1 * - - - 2 - - - - 1 ** * - * * * - - - * - - - - * *

B

Other 63 11 42 8 35 22 5 21 26 36 4 * 5 15 27 63% 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% 2% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 8% 4% 2% 2%

A i m

None/ Nothing 340 97 170 66 180 127 35 113 148 192 23 5 11 89 146 3315% 13% 14% 19% 14% 17% 15% 20% 19% 13% 14% 23% 18% 20% 13% 12%

AB D fI I

Would rather not say/ Can't say 15 4 8 1 8 6 2 5 6 9 2 - 1 4 5 21% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1%

Don't know 1002 381 502 107 517 382 123 270 393 609 88 17 19 226 410 13943% 53% 42% 31% 39% 52% 53% 49% 50% 40% 54% 69% 32% 52% 38% 50%

BC C D I I I L N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 110

Page 120: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 95/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI1. Over the past 12 months have you had direct contact with the GMC?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 381 98 197 80 208 133 47 118 165 216 33 4 13 97 162 3217% 14% 16% 23% 16% 18% 21% 21% 21% 14% 20% 16% 21% 22% 15% 11%

AB I I I

No 1902 614 991 267 1100 597 182 425 607 1295 129 20 49 331 922 24582% 85% 83% 77% 84% 81% 79% 77% 77% 85% 79% 84% 79% 76% 85% 88%

C C e FGH

Don't know 23 9 13 2 6 10 1 11 12 11 1 - - 9 5 21% 1% 1% * * 1% * 2% 2% 1% 1% - - 2% * 1%

D fI i

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 111

Page 121: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 96/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI2. Thinking about the level of communication that you have had with the GMC over the last 12 months, would you say that you have received too much, too little or about theright amount of communication from the GMC?Base: Alldoctors who have had direct contact with the GMC in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 401 89 208 99 218 143 56 131 187 214 40 5 15 107 163 31

Weighted Total 381 98 197 80 208 133 47 118 165 216 33 4 13 97 162 32100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Far too much (5) 10 2 6 2 7 1 2 - 2 8 1 1 - - 6 13% 2% 3% 3% 3% 1% 5% - 1% 4% 3% 15% - - 4% 2%

G G

Slightly too much (4) 17 2 10 5 9 7 1 4 5 12 1 - - 4 8 34% 2% 5% 6% 4% 5% 2% 3% 3% 6% 3% - - 4% 5% 10%

About the right amount (3) 277 72 142 60 152 96 34 95 129 148 24 3 10 77 118 1573% 73% 72% 75% 73% 72% 72% 80% 78% 69% 73% 85% 79% 80% 72% 47%

I I O

Slightly too little (2) 34 8 18 7 21 10 3 8 12 22 2 - 1 7 18 39% 8% 9% 9% 10% 7% 7% 7% 7% 10% 5% - 10% 7% 11% 9%

Far too little (1) 23 7 14 2 12 9 5 8 13 11 5 - 1 7 7 36% 7% 7% 3% 6% 7% 9% 7% 8% 5% 14% - 7% 7% 4% 9%

Don't know 19 7 7 4 7 10 2 3 5 14 1 - 1 2 6 75% 8% 4% 5% 4% 7% 5% 2% 3% 7% 4% - 4% 2% 3% 23%

g N

NETS

Net: Too much 27 4 16 7 16 8 3 4 7 20 2 1 - 4 14 47% 4% 8% 8% 8% 6% 7% 3% 4% 9% 5% 15% - 4% 9% 12%

Gh

Net: Too little 57 15 32 9 33 19 8 16 24 33 6 - 2 13 25 615% 15% 16% 12% 16% 14% 17% 14% 15% 15% 18% - 17% 14% 15% 17%

Mean score 2.88 2.83 2.87 2.96 2.89 2.85 2.85 2.82 2.83 2.92 2.75 3.29 2.75 2.83 2.92 2.84Standard deviation .70 .69 .75 .63 .72 .67 .83 .60 .67 .73 .84 .82 .60 .61 .70 .89Standard error .04 .08 .05 .07 .05 .06 .11 .05 .05 .05 .14 .37 .16 .06 .06 .17

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 112

Page 122: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 97/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI3. Through which, if any, of the following channels have you come into contact with the GMC over the past 12 months?Base: Alldoctors who have had direct contact with the GMC in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 401 89 208 99 218 143 56 131 187 214 40 5 15 107 163 31

Weighted Total 381 98 197 80 208 133 47 118 165 216 33 4 13 97 162 32100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Letter from the GMC 183 37 100 42 110 56 28 48 76 106 22 3 7 37 82 1648% 37% 51% 53% 53% 42% 59% 41% 46% 49% 65% 88% 52% 38% 50% 50%

A A E Gh

The GMC's telephone contact centre 153 47 80 23 63 73 18 69 86 67 13 2 6 59 44 1240% 48% 41% 29% 30% 55% 37% 58% 52% 31% 39% 47% 51% 61% 27% 38%

C c D FI FI

The 'GMC News' newsletter 143 19 83 37 87 39 17 40 57 86 12 1 8 30 67 838% 19% 42% 46% 42% 29% 37% 34% 34% 40% 36% 33% 66% 30% 41% 24%

A A E o

GMC Online (your individual secure portal on theGMC website) 121 43 56 19 62 51 11 42 53 68 5 2 5 35 52 13

32% 44% 28% 24% 30% 38% 24% 35% 32% 31% 16% 62% 41% 36% 32% 41%BC

GMC Events (including GMC conference) 43 8 20 13 25 13 5 13 18 25 2 1 2 11 21 111% 8% 10% 17% 12% 10% 11% 11% 11% 12% 7% 33% 14% 11% 13% 2%

a o

The 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter 40 6 21 13 25 13 7 10 16 24 4 1 2 8 20 411% 7% 11% 16% 12% 10% 14% 8% 10% 11% 11% 33% 13% 8% 12% 12%

A

The GMC's Regional Liaison Service or DevolvedOffices in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales 31 4 16 9 21 7 1 5 6 25 1 1 - 5 20 1

8% 5% 8% 12% 10% 5% 3% 4% 4% 11% 2% 15% - 5% 12% 5%a fGH

Newspapers, radio or television 23 4 12 8 16 5 3 3 6 17 2 - - 3 14 26% 4% 6% 10% 8% 4% 6% 3% 4% 8% 7% - - 3% 8% 7%

gh

'Hot Topics' 13 - 8 4 9 3 3 2 5 9 1 1 1 1 7 23% - 4% 5% 5% 2% 6% 2% 3% 4% 4% 15% 9% 1% 4% 5%

a A

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 113

Page 123: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 97/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI3. Through which, if any, of the following channels have you come into contact with the GMC over the past 12 months?Base: Alldoctors who have had direct contact with the GMC in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 401 89 208 99 218 143 56 131 187 214 40 5 15 107 163 31

Weighted Total 381 98 197 80 208 133 47 118 165 216 33 4 13 97 162 32100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

GMC Social media accounts (e.g. Twitter, Facebook,Linked in, etc.) 9 5 4 - 6 2 2 2 4 5 1 1 - 2 5 -

2% 5% 2% - 3% 2% 5% 1% 2% 2% 3% 15% - 2% 3% -C

None of the above 20 2 10 8 15 2 3 5 8 12 2 - 1 2 12 -5% 2% 5% 11% 7% 2% 6% 4% 5% 6% 5% - 10% 2% 7% -

Ab E

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 114

Page 124: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 98/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_1_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did GMC Online...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All who have come into contact with the GMC through GMC Online in the last 12 months

address your need / answer your query? provide relevant information?

Unweighted Total 121 121

Weighted Total 121 121100% 100%

Yes 97 10080% 83%

No 18 1615% 13%

Don't know 6 55% 4%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 115

Page 125: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 99/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_1_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC Online...

address your need / answer your query?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through GMC Online in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b *c d e *f g h i *j *k *l m n *oSignificance Level: 95% A B *C D E *F G H I *J *K *L M N *O

Unweighted Total 121 37 59 23 61 51 14 44 58 63 7 3 6 36 48 12

Weighted Total 121 43 56 19 62 51 11 42 53 68 5 2 5 35 52 13100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 97 36 43 14 50 42 9 36 46 51 4 2 4 31 42 880% 85% 78% 74% 81% 82% 83% 87% 86% 75% 79% 100% 83% 89% 81% 61%

No 18 3 11 4 11 5 1 5 6 12 1 - 1 4 9 115% 7% 20% 21% 17% 10% 13% 11% 12% 18% 12% - 17% 11% 17% 11%

a

Don't know 6 4 1 1 1 4 * 1 1 5 * - - - 1 45% 8% 2% 6% 2% 7% 4% 2% 2% 7% 8% - - - 2% 28%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 116

Page 126: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 100/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_1_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC Online...

provide relevant information?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through GMC Online in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b *c d e *f g h i *j *k *l m n *oSignificance Level: 95% A B *C D E *F G H I *J *K *L M N *O

Unweighted Total 121 37 59 23 61 51 14 44 58 63 7 3 6 36 48 12

Weighted Total 121 43 56 19 62 51 11 42 53 68 5 2 5 35 52 13100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 100 35 46 16 53 42 9 37 47 53 5 2 5 31 44 883% 81% 83% 83% 86% 82% 85% 89% 88% 78% 100% 100% 89% 89% 84% 61%

No 16 5 8 3 8 5 2 4 6 10 - - 1 4 7 113% 11% 15% 17% 12% 10% 15% 11% 12% 15% - - 11% 11% 13% 11%

Don't know 5 4 1 - 1 4 - - - 5 - - - - 1 44% 8% 2% - 2% 7% - - - 7% - - - - 2% 28%

gH

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 117

Page 127: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 101/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_2_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC's telephone contact centre...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's telephone contact centre in the last 12 months

address your need / answer your query? provide relevant information?

Unweighted Total 161 161

Weighted Total 153 153100% 100%

Yes 126 12582% 82%

No 27 2817% 18%

Don't know * -* -

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 118

Page 128: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 102/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_2_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC's telephone contact centre...

address your need / answer your query?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's telephone contact centre in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b *c d e *f g h i *j *k *l m n *oSignificance Level: 95% A B *C D E *F G H I *J *K *L M N *O

Unweighted Total 161 43 86 29 66 79 22 76 98 63 17 2 7 65 42 12

Weighted Total 153 47 80 23 63 73 18 69 86 67 13 2 6 59 44 12100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 126 41 65 17 47 67 12 65 77 49 7 2 6 57 34 882% 86% 82% 73% 74% 92% 66% 95% 89% 73% 53% 100% 86% 97% 78% 67%

D I I

No 27 6 14 6 17 5 6 3 9 17 6 - 1 2 10 417% 13% 18% 27% 26% 7% 34% 5% 11% 26% 47% - 14% 3% 22% 30%

E GH

Don't know * * - - - * - - - * - - - - - ** 1% - - - 1% - - - 1% - - - - - 4%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 119

Page 129: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 103/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_2_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC's telephone contact centre...

provide relevant information?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's telephone contact centre in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b *c d e *f g h i *j *k *l m n *oSignificance Level: 95% A B *C D E *F G H I *J *K *L M N *O

Unweighted Total 161 43 86 29 66 79 22 76 98 63 17 2 7 65 42 12

Weighted Total 153 47 80 23 63 73 18 69 86 67 13 2 6 59 44 12100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 125 40 65 17 46 68 10 65 76 49 6 2 6 57 34 982% 85% 81% 75% 72% 93% 59% 95% 88% 74% 50% 100% 86% 97% 76% 74%

D hI I

No 28 7 15 6 18 5 7 3 11 18 6 - 1 2 10 318% 15% 19% 25% 28% 7% 41% 5% 12% 26% 50% - 14% 3% 24% 26%

E g GH

Don't know - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 120

Page 130: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 104/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_3_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the letter from the GMC...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the letter from the GMC in the last 12 months

address your need / answer your query? provide relevant information?

Unweighted Total 194 194

Weighted Total 183 183100% 100%

Yes 126 14269% 78%

No 33 2818% 15%

Don't know 23 1313% 7%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 121

Page 131: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 105/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_3_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the letter from the GMC...

address your need / answer your query?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the letter from the GMC in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i *j *k *l m n *oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I *J *K *L M N *O

Unweighted Total 194 34 108 49 117 61 33 54 87 107 26 4 8 41 83 16

Weighted Total 183 37 100 42 110 56 28 48 76 106 22 3 7 37 82 16100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 126 22 73 30 73 42 24 38 63 64 19 3 4 31 50 869% 59% 73% 72% 66% 74% 86% 80% 82% 60% 87% 100% 61% 83% 61% 49%

I I I

No 33 11 11 8 25 5 2 3 5 28 2 - 1 2 23 418% 31% 11% 19% 23% 9% 7% 6% 6% 27% 9% - 14% 4% 28% 23%

B E FGH

Don't know 23 4 16 4 12 9 2 7 9 14 1 - 2 5 9 413% 10% 16% 9% 11% 16% 7% 14% 12% 13% 4% - 26% 13% 11% 28%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 122

Page 132: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 106/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_3_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the letter from the GMC...

provide relevant information?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the letter from the GMC in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i *j *k *l m n *oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I *J *K *L M N *O

Unweighted Total 194 34 108 49 117 61 33 54 87 107 26 4 8 41 83 16

Weighted Total 183 37 100 42 110 56 28 48 76 106 22 3 7 37 82 16100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 142 23 82 34 81 46 25 43 68 74 19 3 6 32 57 1178% 63% 82% 81% 74% 83% 89% 88% 89% 70% 86% 100% 86% 87% 70% 69%

A a I I I

No 28 10 10 7 20 6 1 3 5 23 1 - 1 3 18 315% 26% 10% 16% 18% 10% 5% 7% 6% 21% 6% - 14% 7% 21% 19%

B FGH

Don't know 13 4 8 1 9 4 2 2 4 10 2 - - 2 7 27% 10% 8% 3% 8% 7% 6% 5% 5% 9% 8% - - 6% 9% 11%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 123

Page 133: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 107/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_4_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the 'GMC News' newsletter...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News' newsletter in the last 12 months

address your need / answer your query? provide relevant information?

Unweighted Total 151 151

Weighted Total 143 143100% 100%

Yes 61 9343% 65%

No 40 2428% 17%

Don't know 42 2629% 18%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 124

Page 134: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 108/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_4_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the 'GMC News' newsletter...

address your need / answer your query?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News' newsletter in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a b c d e *f g h i *j *k *l m n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A B C D E *F G H I *J *K *L M N *O

Unweighted Total 151 21 82 45 89 45 20 45 65 86 13 2 9 34 67 9

Weighted Total 143 19 83 37 87 39 17 40 57 86 12 1 8 30 67 8100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 61 8 34 16 35 26 9 29 38 24 6 1 5 24 23 143% 43% 41% 44% 40% 67% 49% 74% 66% 27% 54% 100% 65% 81% 34% 12%

D I I

No 40 7 22 10 28 5 6 3 9 31 4 - 1 2 23 328% 35% 27% 26% 32% 12% 32% 8% 15% 36% 34% - 12% 6% 34% 40%

E GH

Don't know 42 4 27 11 25 8 3 7 10 31 1 - 2 4 22 429% 22% 32% 30% 29% 20% 19% 18% 18% 37% 12% - 24% 14% 32% 48%

GH

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 125

Page 135: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 109/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_4_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the 'GMC News' newsletter...

provide relevant information?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News' newsletter in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a b c d e *f g h i *j *k *l m n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A B C D E *F G H I *J *K *L M N *O

Unweighted Total 151 21 82 45 89 45 20 45 65 86 13 2 9 34 67 9

Weighted Total 143 19 83 37 87 39 17 40 57 86 12 1 8 30 67 8100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 93 10 56 25 55 33 13 35 48 45 10 1 6 28 39 465% 51% 67% 67% 63% 86% 76% 88% 84% 53% 81% 100% 76% 94% 58% 52%

D I I

No 24 5 12 6 17 1 1 - 1 23 1 - - - 16 117% 27% 14% 16% 20% 3% 5% - 2% 27% 7% - - - 24% 17%

E GH

Don't know 26 4 16 6 15 4 3 5 8 18 1 - 2 2 12 218% 22% 19% 17% 17% 11% 19% 12% 14% 21% 12% - 24% 6% 17% 32%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 126

Page 136: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 110/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_5_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter in the last 12 months

address your need / answer your query? provide relevant information?

Unweighted Total 42 42

Weighted Total 40 40100% 100%

Yes 18 2846% 69%

No 12 529% 13%

Don't know 10 725% 17%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 127

Page 137: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 111/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_5_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter...

address your need / answer your query?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 42 5 21 16 27 12 8 9 17 25 4 2 2 7 21 3

Weighted Total 40 6 21 13 25 13 7 10 16 24 4 1 2 8 20 4100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 18 3 10 5 10 8 4 6 9 9 2 1 1 5 7 146% 53% 46% 41% 39% 63% 53% 62% 58% 37% 62% 100% 34% 68% 35% 39%

No 12 2 5 6 12 - 1 - 1 10 1 - - - 10 -29% 23% 23% 43% 47% - 21% - 9% 43% 38% - - - 52% -

Don't know 10 2 7 2 4 5 2 4 5 5 - - 1 3 2 225% 24% 31% 16% 14% 37% 27% 38% 33% 20% - - 66% 32% 13% 61%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 128

Page 138: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 112/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_5_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter...

provide relevant information?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the 'GMC News for doctors' newsletter in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 42 5 21 16 27 12 8 9 17 25 4 2 2 7 21 3

Weighted Total 40 6 21 13 25 13 7 10 16 24 4 1 2 8 20 4100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 28 5 14 9 18 10 4 9 13 15 3 1 2 7 13 169% 77% 66% 71% 70% 75% 64% 90% 79% 63% 82% 100% 100% 88% 66% 39%

No 5 2 1 3 5 - 1 - 1 5 1 - - - 5 -13% 23% 5% 22% 21% - 10% - 4% 20% 18% - - - 24% -

Don't know 7 - 6 1 2 3 2 1 3 4 - - - 1 2 217% - 29% 7% 8% 25% 27% 10% 17% 18% - - - 12% 10% 61%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 129

Page 139: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 113/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_6_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did 'Hot Topics'...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All who have come into contact with the GMC through 'Hot Topics' in the last 12 months

address your need / answer your query? provide relevant information?

Unweighted Total 16 16

Weighted Total 13 13100% 100%

Yes 6 744% 53%

No 2 118% 9%

Don't know 5 538% 38%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 130

Page 140: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 114/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_6_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the 'Hot Topics'...

address your need / answer your query?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through 'Hot Topics' in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 16 - 9 6 10 5 3 2 5 11 1 1 1 1 8 3

Weighted Total 13 - 8 4 9 3 3 2 5 9 1 1 1 1 7 2100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 6 - 4 2 3 3 2 2 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 144% - 44% 59% 35% 87% 66% 100% 80% 26% 100% 100% 100% 100% 15% 76%

No 2 - 1 - 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 -18% - 14% - 25% - - - - 27% - - - - 33% -

Don't know 5 - 3 2 4 * 1 - 1 4 - - - - 4 *38% - 42% 41% 40% 13% 34% - 20% 48% - - - - 53% 24%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 131

Page 141: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 115/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_6_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the 'Hot Topics'...

provide relevant information?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through 'Hot Topics' in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 16 - 9 6 10 5 3 2 5 11 1 1 1 1 8 3

Weighted Total 13 - 8 4 9 3 3 2 5 9 1 1 1 1 7 2100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 7 - 5 2 4 3 2 2 4 3 1 1 1 1 2 153% - 58% 59% 47% 87% 66% 100% 80% 39% 100% 100% 100% 100% 30% 76%

No 1 - - - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1 -9% - - - 13% - - - - 14% - - - - 17% -

Don't know 5 - 3 2 4 * 1 - 1 4 - - - - 4 *38% - 42% 41% 40% 13% 34% - 20% 48% - - - - 53% 24%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 132

Page 142: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 116/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_8_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC Social media account(s)...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC Social media account(s) in the last 12 months

address your need / answer your query? provide relevant information?

Unweighted Total 10 10

Weighted Total 9 9100% 100%

Yes 4 347% 37%

No 3 337% 37%

Don't know 1 216% 26%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 133

Page 143: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 117/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_8_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC Social media account(s)...

address your need / answer your query?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC Social media account(s) in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 10 5 5 - 6 3 3 2 5 5 1 1 - 2 5 -

Weighted Total 9 5 4 - 6 2 2 2 4 5 1 1 - 2 5 -100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% -

Yes 4 3 1 - 2 2 1 2 2 2 - 1 - 2 2 -47% 52% 39% - 34% 100% 25% 100% 56% 40% - 100% - 100% 40% -

No 3 2 1 - 2 - 2 - 2 2 1 - - - 2 -37% 48% 21% - 42% - 75% - 44% 31% 100% - - - 31% -

Don't know 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1 -16% - 39% - 24% - - - - 29% - - - - 29% -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 134

Page 144: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 118/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_8_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC Social media account(s)...

provide relevant information?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC Social media account(s) in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 10 5 5 - 6 3 3 2 5 5 1 1 - 2 5 -

Weighted Total 9 5 4 - 6 2 2 2 4 5 1 1 - 2 5 -100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% -

Yes 3 3 1 - 1 2 1 2 2 1 - 1 - 2 1 -37% 52% 15% - 19% 100% 25% 100% 56% 22% - 100% - 100% 22% -

No 3 2 1 - 2 - 2 - 2 2 1 - - - 2 -37% 48% 21% - 42% - 75% - 44% 31% 100% - - - 31% -

Don't know 2 - 2 - 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 -26% - 64% - 39% - - - - 46% - - - - 46% -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 135

Page 145: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 119/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_9_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC event(s)...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC event(s) in the last 12 months

address your need / answer your query? provide relevant information?

Unweighted Total 49 49

Weighted Total 43 43100% 100%

Yes 31 3573% 82%

No 7 416% 10%

Don't know 4 310% 8%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 136

Page 146: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 120/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_9_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC event(s)...

address your need / answer your query?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC event(s) in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a *b *c d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 49 8 22 18 30 15 6 14 20 29 3 2 2 12 25 1

Weighted Total 43 8 20 13 25 13 5 13 18 25 2 1 2 11 21 1100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 31 7 14 10 16 12 4 11 14 17 1 1 1 10 14 173% 86% 67% 72% 64% 91% 77% 84% 82% 67% 45% 100% 49% 90% 67% 100%

No 7 - 4 3 6 - 1 - 1 6 1 - - - 4 -16% - 18% 24% 23% - 23% - 7% 23% 55% - - - 21% -

Don't know 4 1 3 * 3 1 - 2 2 2 - - 1 1 2 -10% 14% 14% 3% 13% 9% - 16% 11% 10% - - 51% 10% 12% -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 137

Page 147: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 121/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_9_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC event(s)...

provide relevant information?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC event(s) in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a *b *c d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 49 8 22 18 30 15 6 14 20 29 3 2 2 12 25 1

Weighted Total 43 8 20 13 25 13 5 13 18 25 2 1 2 11 21 1100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 35 7 17 10 20 11 4 10 14 21 1 1 1 9 18 182% 86% 86% 72% 81% 87% 77% 80% 79% 84% 45% 100% 49% 84% 87% 100%

No 4 1 - 3 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 - - 1 1 -10% 14% - 24% 8% 9% 23% 9% 13% 8% 55% - - 10% 4% -

Don't know 3 - 3 * 3 1 - 1 1 2 - - 1 1 2 -8% - 14% 3% 11% 4% - 12% 8% 8% - - 51% 5% 9% -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 138

Page 148: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 122/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_10_SUM. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the GMC's Regional Liaison Service...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's Regional Liaison Service in the last 12 months

address your need / answer your query? provide relevant information?

Unweighted Total 35 35

Weighted Total 31 31100% 100%

Yes 22 2571% 79%

No 5 415% 11%

Don't know 4 313% 10%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 139

Page 149: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 123/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_10_1. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC's Regional Liaison Service...

address your need / answer your query?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's Regional Liaison Service in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 35 4 17 13 23 8 3 5 8 27 2 1 - 5 21 2

Weighted Total 31 4 16 9 21 7 1 5 6 25 1 1 - 5 20 1100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100%

Yes 22 2 13 6 15 6 1 5 6 17 - 1 - 5 15 *71% 47% 80% 64% 71% 84% 41% 100% 87% 67% - 100% - 100% 74% 25%

No 5 2 2 1 2 1 * - * 4 * - - - 2 115% 53% 10% 9% 12% 16% 30% - 6% 18% 50% - - - 10% 75%

Don't know 4 - 2 3 4 - * - * 4 * - - - 3 -13% - 10% 27% 17% - 30% - 6% 15% 50% - - - 16% -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 140

Page 150: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 124/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI4_10_2. And thinking about each of the GMC information sources you have accessed in the last 12 months in turn, did the the GMC's Regional Liaison Service...

provide relevant information?Base: All who have come into contact with the GMC through the GMC's Regional Liaison Service in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *l *m *n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A *B *C *D *E *F *G *H *I *J *K *L *M *N *O

Unweighted Total 35 4 17 13 23 8 3 5 8 27 2 1 - 5 21 2

Weighted Total 31 4 16 9 21 7 1 5 6 25 1 1 - 5 20 1100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100%

Yes 25 2 14 7 18 5 1 4 5 19 * 1 - 4 17 *79% 47% 86% 79% 86% 74% 70% 85% 82% 78% 50% 100% - 85% 88% 25%

No 4 2 * 1 * 2 * 1 1 2 * - - 1 - 111% 53% 3% 8% 2% 26% 30% 15% 18% 9% 50% - - 15% - 75%

Don't know 3 - 2 1 2 - - - - 3 - - - - 2 -10% - 11% 13% 12% - - - - 12% - - - - 12% -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 141

Page 151: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 125/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI5_SUM. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding the GMC's communication with you?

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All doctors

NETS

Total Strongly agree Tend to agreeNeither agree nor

disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Agree Disagree Mean

The GMC keeps me adequately informed of its work andpriorities 2306 288 933 681 227 102 75 1221 329 3.48

100% 13% 40% 30% 10% 4% 3% 53% 14%

GMC communications have an appropriate tone 2306 260 807 720 271 147 100 1068 418 3.35100% 11% 35% 31% 12% 6% 4% 46% 18%

GMC communications are always relevant to me 2306 150 553 913 472 163 54 703 636 3.02100% 7% 24% 40% 20% 7% 2% 31% 28%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 142

Page 152: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 126/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI5_1. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding the GMC's communication with you?

The GMC keeps me adequately informed of its work and prioritiesBase: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 288 86 154 48 140 127 41 111 152 136 30 8 11 92 99 2813% 12% 13% 14% 11% 17% 18% 20% 19% 9% 18% 32% 18% 21% 9% 10%

D I I I j

Tend to agree (4) 933 255 506 152 525 296 99 244 344 589 67 7 30 193 427 9640% 35% 42% 44% 40% 40% 43% 44% 44% 39% 41% 29% 50% 44% 39% 34%

A A I I

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 681 218 350 101 416 198 60 133 194 488 42 6 14 101 360 9130% 30% 29% 29% 32% 27% 26% 24% 25% 32% 26% 27% 23% 23% 33% 33%

E fGH

Tend to disagree (2) 227 89 113 24 132 71 10 38 48 179 8 2 3 32 122 3710% 12% 9% 7% 10% 10% 4% 7% 6% 12% 5% 7% 4% 7% 11% 13%

bC FGH

Strongly disagree (1) 102 42 41 17 56 28 7 14 21 81 5 - 1 13 50 154% 6% 3% 5% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 5% 3% - 1% 3% 5% 5%

B fGH

Don't know 75 31 36 6 46 20 14 13 26 49 11 1 3 7 32 123% 4% 3% 2% 3% 3% 6% 2% 3% 3% 7% 4% 4% 2% 3% 4%

C GhI

NETS

Net: Agree 1221 341 660 201 665 423 140 356 496 725 97 15 41 284 527 12453% 47% 55% 58% 51% 57% 61% 64% 63% 48% 60% 61% 67% 65% 48% 44%

A A D I I I

Net: Disagree 329 131 154 41 188 99 16 52 68 260 13 2 3 46 171 5214% 18% 13% 12% 14% 13% 7% 9% 9% 17% 8% 7% 6% 10% 16% 19%

BC FGH

Mean score 3.48 3.37 3.53 3.56 3.44 3.59 3.73 3.74 3.74 3.35 3.72 3.90 3.81 3.74 3.38 3.32A A D I I I

Standard deviation .99 1.05 .96 .98 .97 1.01 .92 .95 .94 .99 .95 .98 .84 .98 .97 1.02Standard error .02 .04 .03 .05 .03 .04 .06 .04 .03 .03 .07 .18 .10 .04 .03 .06

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 143

Page 153: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 127/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI5_2. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding the GMC's communication with you?

GMC communications are always relevant to meBase: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 150 53 76 21 68 77 23 61 84 66 18 4 3 57 47 177% 7% 6% 6% 5% 10% 10% 11% 11% 4% 11% 16% 6% 13% 4% 6%

D I I I l

Tend to agree (4) 553 140 312 92 299 201 63 171 235 319 45 6 17 145 237 5024% 19% 26% 27% 23% 27% 27% 31% 30% 21% 27% 26% 28% 33% 22% 18%

A A D I I I

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 913 264 490 143 519 281 94 212 306 607 63 10 30 151 426 12140% 37% 41% 41% 39% 38% 41% 38% 39% 40% 38% 43% 49% 34% 39% 43%

a M

Tend to disagree (2) 472 174 226 66 302 125 33 75 109 364 23 3 8 58 271 6320% 24% 19% 19% 23% 17% 15% 14% 14% 24% 14% 14% 13% 13% 25% 23%

BC E FGH

Strongly disagree (1) 163 66 71 23 98 38 8 20 28 135 7 - 1 18 90 207% 9% 6% 7% 7% 5% 4% 4% 4% 9% 4% - 2% 4% 8% 7%

B E FGH

Don't know 54 24 25 3 29 18 8 14 22 31 8 - 2 9 19 92% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 4% 3% 3% 2% 5% - 3% 2% 2% 3%

C c

NETS

Net: Agree 703 194 387 114 367 278 86 233 319 385 63 10 20 202 284 6631% 27% 32% 33% 28% 38% 37% 42% 41% 25% 38% 43% 33% 46% 26% 24%

A A D I I I L

Net: Disagree 636 240 298 89 400 163 42 95 137 499 30 3 9 76 361 8328% 33% 25% 26% 30% 22% 18% 17% 17% 33% 18% 14% 15% 17% 33% 30%

BC E FGH

Mean score 3.02 2.92 3.08 3.06 2.95 3.21 3.26 3.33 3.31 2.88 3.28 3.44 3.22 3.38 2.89 2.93A A D I I I

Standard deviation 1.01 1.06 .98 .99 .99 1.02 .97 .97 .97 .99 1.00 .95 .83 1.01 .99 .98Standard error .02 .04 .03 .05 .03 .04 .06 .04 .03 .03 .07 .16 .10 .05 .03 .06

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 144

Page 154: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 128/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI5_3. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding the GMC's communication with you?

GMC communications have an appropriate toneBase: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 260 92 136 32 125 122 43 103 146 115 32 8 11 88 82 2711% 13% 11% 9% 10% 17% 19% 19% 19% 8% 20% 31% 18% 20% 8% 10%

c D I I I

Tend to agree (4) 807 235 432 128 488 234 88 197 285 523 64 8 25 151 399 7435% 33% 36% 37% 37% 32% 38% 36% 36% 34% 39% 35% 41% 35% 37% 26%

E O

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 720 193 408 109 391 242 64 175 238 482 41 5 16 136 333 10031% 27% 34% 31% 30% 33% 28% 32% 30% 32% 25% 22% 27% 31% 31% 36%

A n

Tend to disagree (2) 271 94 126 44 175 66 23 40 62 209 13 3 4 31 158 3212% 13% 10% 13% 13% 9% 10% 7% 8% 14% 8% 12% 7% 7% 15% 11%

b E fGH

Strongly disagree (1) 147 59 55 30 88 35 4 18 22 125 4 - 3 14 80 216% 8% 5% 8% 7% 5% 2% 3% 3% 8% 3% - 5% 3% 7% 7%

B B e FGH

Don't know 100 48 44 6 47 42 9 22 31 68 9 - 1 16 37 264% 7% 4% 2% 4% 6% 4% 4% 4% 4% 6% - 2% 4% 3% 9%

BC c D N

NETS

Net: Agree 1068 327 568 160 614 356 131 299 431 637 96 16 36 239 481 10046% 45% 47% 46% 47% 48% 57% 54% 55% 42% 59% 66% 59% 55% 44% 36%

I I I O

Net: Disagree 418 153 181 73 263 101 27 57 84 334 17 3 8 46 239 5218% 21% 15% 21% 20% 14% 12% 10% 11% 22% 10% 12% 12% 10% 22% 19%

B B E FGH

Mean score 3.35 3.31 3.40 3.26 3.31 3.49 3.65 3.62 3.62 3.20 3.70 3.86 3.61 3.64 3.23 3.21aC D I I I

Standard deviation 1.05 1.14 .99 1.08 1.05 1.04 .97 .99 .98 1.06 .98 1.01 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.06Standard error .02 .05 .03 .05 .03 .04 .06 .04 .03 .03 .07 .18 .13 .05 .03 .07

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 145

Page 155: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 129/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI6. Overall, what one thing could the GMC do to improve its communication/ contact with you?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Regular email - updates/ case studies/ Q&A/guidance/ newsletters 141 40 77 23 55 71 3 63 66 74 2 1 2 52 51 17

6% 6% 6% 7% 4% 10% 2% 11% 8% 5% 1% 4% 4% 12% 5% 6%D FhI FI F L

Better support to doctors/ information to doctors 110 33 65 9 60 32 7 18 25 85 3 1 2 12 55 205% 5% 5% 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% 6% 2% 2% 3% 3% 5% 7%

C fGH

Happy with current communication/ contact/ getenough stuff 76 15 46 16 49 22 12 20 32 44 9 1 2 16 39 4

3% 2% 4% 4% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4% 3% 6% 6% 2% 4% 4% 1%A A I o

Clear and concise information and guidance/ specificinformation 69 22 36 11 37 27 7 13 19 50 6 - 1 12 31 15

3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% 2% 2% 3% 4% - 1% 3% 3% 5%N

Do more local and regional events, conferences,meetings, training sessions/ Have a localrepresentative 44 9 29 6 24 19 5 12 18 26 4 1 - 12 19 5

2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 4% - 3% 2% 2%a

Mobile app 36 17 16 3 16 17 1 13 14 22 1 * 1 12 15 52% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% * 2% 2% 1% * 2% 1% 3% 1% 2%

c d F

Friendly tone of communication 35 13 14 8 27 4 2 4 6 30 1 - 2 2 24 22% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% * - 3% * 2% 1%

b E GH M

24x7 Helpline/ webchat 33 8 23 2 19 12 4 12 16 17 3 - 1 11 15 11% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% - 2% 3% 1% *

c i i

Improve and streamline communication/ image 27 7 13 7 22 4 2 3 6 21 1 - - 3 21 *1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 2% *

E O

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 146

Page 156: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 129/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI6. Overall, what one thing could the GMC do to improve its communication/ contact with you?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Nothing to do with them/ No need / No (direct)Contact/ Leave alone/ Minimise contact 26 7 13 5 18 2 3 3 6 20 1 1 1 - 17 2

1% 1% 1% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% - 2% 1%E M

Be relevant/ realistic/ responsive/ interactive/accountable 25 6 17 2 11 10 3 4 7 17 2 - - 4 9 6

1% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - - 1% 1% 2%N

Less austere/ being less suspicious of doctors/ morefriendly/ Approachable 23 10 8 5 14 8 * 3 4 19 * - 1 3 13 5

1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% * 1% * 1% * - 1% 1% 1% 2%h

Cost less/ Charges less/ reduce subscription fees 20 9 9 2 12 4 1 2 3 17 1 - - 1 12 41% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% * * * 1% * - - * 1% 1%

H

Ease of access 20 5 10 4 9 6 1 7 8 11 1 - 1 5 7 11% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% 1%

Better/ Improved website with all relevant informationavailable with ease 19 2 13 5 12 5 2 5 7 11 2 - - 4 11 1

1% * 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% *a A

Stop sending too many emails/ stop paper post/reduce spam 17 5 10 1 10 7 2 2 4 13 2 - - 2 8 5

1% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 1% * * 1% 1% - - * 1% 2%

More transparency 15 7 6 3 12 1 - 1 1 14 - - - 1 12 11% 1% * 1% 1% * - * * 1% - - - * 1% *

E GH

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 147

Page 157: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 129/3

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI6. Overall, what one thing could the GMC do to improve its communication/ contact with you?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Named contact/ Direct contact/ Liaison person details 15 5 9 1 11 4 2 2 4 10 2 - - 2 9 21% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 1% * 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 1%

Respond faster to telephone, emails andcommunications, especially to stressful issues/ Quickresponse/ Better communication about investigationand timeframes 14 2 6 6 7 5 1 4 5 9 - - - 4 7 1

1% * * 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - - 1% 1% *AB

Social Media - Twitter/ Facebook etc.. 13 7 6 - 4 8 2 5 6 6 2 - - 3 2 51% 1% 1% - * 1% 1% 1% 1% * 1% - - 1% * 2%

C D N

Whistle blowing protection/ welfare of doctors/clarification on consequences of making complaintsand ethical discussion 10 6 3 1 8 2 1 2 3 8 - - 1 1 7 1

* 1% * * 1% * * * * 1% - - 1% * 1% *b

More telephone contact 10 1 5 3 4 6 3 4 7 3 1 1 - 4 2 1* * * 1% * 1% 1% 1% 1% * 1% 5% - 1% * *

a d I i I j

Breakup of Fees 10 4 5 - 5 3 1 1 2 8 1 - - 1 4 2* 1% * - * * * * * 1% 1% - - * * 1%

Effective and accurate revalidation 9 3 2 5 5 3 1 2 3 6 1 - - 2 5 1* * * 1% * * * * * * * - - * * *

aB

Reduce newsletters 6 3 3 - 3 3 - - - 6 - - - - 3 3* * * - * * - - - * - - - - * 1%

h n

SMS reminders 6 4 3 - 3 4 - 4 4 3 - - - 4 3 -* 1% * - * 1% - 1% * * - - - 1% * -

i

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 148

Page 158: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 129/4

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI6. Overall, what one thing could the GMC do to improve its communication/ contact with you?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Stop Revalidation 4 - 2 2 2 * - * * 3 - - - * 2 -* - * 1% * * - * * * - - - * * -

Ab

Send paper post 3 1 2 1 2 1 - 1 1 2 - - - 1 2 -* * * * * * - * * * - - - * * -

Take feedback/ surveys 3 - 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 - - 1 1 -* - * * * * * * * * 1% - - * * -

More frequent contact/ more one to one meetings/building relationships 2 2 - - 2 - 1 - 1 2 1 - - - 2 -

* * - - * - * - * * 1% - - - * -B

Early visit to medical school rather than final year/explain the role of GMC to medical students inmedical school throughout 1 - 1 - - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - 1

* - * - - * - - - * - - - - - 1%N

Other 168 49 79 34 95 40 11 31 42 126 7 1 7 19 81 217% 7% 7% 10% 7% 5% 5% 6% 5% 8% 5% 2% 11% 4% 7% 7%

aB FGH M

None/ Nothing 93 32 48 11 44 42 12 39 51 42 7 3 5 32 33 74% 4% 4% 3% 3% 6% 5% 7% 6% 3% 4% 14% 7% 7% 3% 2%

D I I I J

Don't know/ no response 1296 420 674 179 759 398 146 295 441 855 105 15 38 229 616 15456% 58% 56% 51% 58% 54% 63% 53% 56% 56% 64% 60% 61% 52% 57% 55%

C c e GHI

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 149

Page 159: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 130/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI8. Taking into account the GMC's engagement with you over the past 12 months, how much do you agree or disagree that it is focusing on the right issues as a regulator?Base: All who have had contact with the GMC in the last 12 months

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k *l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K *L M N O

Unweighted Total 401 89 208 99 218 143 56 131 187 214 40 5 15 107 163 31

Weighted Total 381 98 197 80 208 133 47 118 165 216 33 4 13 97 162 32100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Strongly agree (5) 45 15 24 7 21 23 11 20 32 14 8 3 1 18 12 212% 15% 12% 9% 10% 18% 24% 17% 19% 6% 24% 88% 8% 18% 7% 6%

D I I I

Tend to agree (4) 140 30 77 30 68 60 12 65 77 64 8 - 7 54 53 637% 30% 39% 37% 33% 45% 25% 55% 46% 29% 23% - 58% 56% 33% 17%

D FI FI o

Neither agree nor disagree (3) 92 26 46 19 53 26 13 21 34 58 10 * 1 18 43 724% 27% 23% 23% 25% 19% 27% 18% 21% 27% 29% 12% 5% 19% 26% 22%

g

Tend to disagree (2) 58 13 34 11 42 10 4 7 11 47 3 - 2 4 36 615% 13% 17% 14% 20% 8% 9% 6% 7% 22% 10% - 17% 4% 22% 19%

E FGH

Strongly disagree (1) 35 10 13 12 20 8 6 3 9 26 3 - 1 1 16 79% 10% 7% 15% 10% 6% 13% 2% 5% 12% 10% - 7% 1% 10% 21%

B Gh GH n

Don't know 10 4 5 1 5 6 1 2 3 7 1 - 1 2 3 43% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 3% 2% 2% 3% 4% - 4% 2% 2% 13%

N

NETS

Net: Agree 186 45 100 37 89 83 23 86 109 77 15 3 8 72 65 849% 46% 51% 46% 43% 63% 49% 73% 66% 36% 47% 88% 66% 74% 40% 24%

D i FI FI o

Net: Disagree 93 22 47 23 62 18 10 9 19 73 7 - 3 5 52 1324% 23% 24% 29% 30% 14% 22% 8% 12% 34% 20% - 24% 6% 32% 40%

E Gh fGH

Mean score 3.28 3.30 3.33 3.11 3.14 3.64 3.39 3.81 3.69 2.96 3.43 4.77 3.45 3.87 3.06 2.64D I FI fI

Standard deviation 1.15 1.20 1.11 1.22 1.15 1.07 1.31 .87 1.03 1.14 1.27 .75 1.15 .81 1.12 1.28Standard error .06 .13 .08 .12 .08 .09 .18 .08 .08 .08 .21 .33 .31 .08 .09 .25

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 150

Page 160: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 131/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI9. Where do you think the GMC should be focusing more of its attention?Base: All doctors who have had direct contact with the GMC in the last 12 months and disagree that the GMC is focusing on the right issues as a regulator

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a b *c d *e *f *g *h i *j *k *l *m n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A B *C D *E *F *G *H I *J *K *L *M N *O

Unweighted Total 95 18 49 27 64 18 13 11 24 71 9 - 3 7 52 11

Weighted Total 93 22 47 23 62 18 10 9 19 73 7 - 3 5 52 13100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100%

More Support for doctors than just giving guidance 15 3 8 4 11 4 1 1 2 13 * - - 1 10 316% 12% 17% 19% 17% 21% 12% 9% 10% 18% 6% - - 15% 20% 23%

Doctors welfare/ health/ safety 13 4 8 1 10 2 1 1 2 11 1 - - 1 10 114% 19% 18% 3% 17% 11% 14% 7% 11% 15% 10% - - 12% 19% 10%

Regulation/ Standards/ Processes 11 2 6 3 6 2 - 2 2 9 - - 1 1 5 212% 10% 12% 14% 10% 12% - 23% 11% 12% - - 29% 11% 10% 12%

Patient Safety 8 2 4 1 7 * - - - 8 - - - - 7 *8% 10% 8% 6% 12% 3% - - - 10% - - - - 14% 4%

Helping doctors improve/ Training/ Guidance 6 2 3 1 5 1 1 * 2 4 1 - - * 4 16% 10% 6% 4% 8% 7% 12% 5% 9% 6% 19% - - 8% 7% 6%

Improve Standards/ focus more on patients/ highMedical standards 4 - 2 2 4 - 1 1 2 2 1 - 1 - 2 -

5% - 4% 10% 7% - 8% 12% 10% 3% 13% - 36% - 5% -

Focus more on values and ethics 4 - 1 3 1 - - - - 4 - - - - 1 -4% - 2% 11% 2% - - - - 5% - - - - 2% -

Reduce Costs/ Arrange alternate funding 3 2 - 1 1 2 - - - 3 - - - - 1 23% 8% - 5% 2% 10% - - - 4% - - - - 2% 14%

Foreign national doctors are of proper standard 3 - 2 1 3 - - - - 3 - - - - 3 -3% - 4% 3% 4% - - - - 4% - - - - 5% -

Simplify appraisal and revalidation 3 - - 2 3 - * - * 2 * - - - 2 -3% - - 9% 4% - 5% - 3% 3% 8% - - - 4% -

Remove doctors performing poorly 2 - 1 1 * 1 - - - 2 - - - - * 13% - 2% 6% 1% 4% - - - 3% - - - - 1% 5%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 151

Page 161: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 131/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI9. Where do you think the GMC should be focusing more of its attention?Base: All doctors who have had direct contact with the GMC in the last 12 months and disagree that the GMC is focusing on the right issues as a regulator

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a b *c d *e *f *g *h i *j *k *l *m n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A B *C D *E *F *G *H I *J *K *L *M N *O

Unweighted Total 95 18 49 27 64 18 13 11 24 71 9 - 3 7 52 11

Weighted Total 93 22 47 23 62 18 10 9 19 73 7 - 3 5 52 13100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100%

Whistleblowing protection/ Respond appropriately toDr. Chris Case 1 1 1 - 1 1 - - - 1 - - - - 1 1

1% 2% 2% - 1% 3% - - - 2% - - - - 1% 4%

Training of Doctors 1 - - 1 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - -1% - - 3% 1% - 6% - 3% - 10% - - - - -

Other 3 1 1 * * - 1 - 1 2 - - - - * -3% 5% 2% 2% 1% - 8% - 4% 2% - - - - 1% -

Don't know 20 6 12 2 12 5 5 4 8 12 3 - 1 2 8 322% 29% 25% 9% 20% 29% 44% 39% 41% 16% 51% - 36% 45% 15% 22%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 152

Page 162: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 132/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI9. Where do you think the GMC should be focusing less of its attention?Base: All doctors who have had direct contact with the GMC in the last 12 months and disagree that the GMC is focusing on the right issues as a regulator

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a b *c d *e *f *g *h i *j *k *l *m n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A B *C D *E *F *G *H I *J *K *L *M N *O

Unweighted Total 95 18 49 27 64 18 13 11 24 71 9 - 3 7 52 11

Weighted Total 93 22 47 23 62 18 10 9 19 73 7 - 3 5 52 13100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100%

Criticising doctors/ Demonising doctors 11 4 4 3 5 3 - 1 1 10 - - - 1 5 212% 20% 8% 13% 9% 14% - 9% 4% 14% - - - 15% 10% 14%

Supporting political agenda/ politics 10 5 3 3 8 1 - 1 1 9 - - - 1 8 111% 21% 6% 11% 12% 7% - 7% 3% 13% - - - 12% 15% 4%

Revalidation 9 2 2 5 6 2 - 2 2 8 - - - 2 6 110% 7% 5% 23% 10% 12% - 17% 8% 11% - - - 29% 11% 5%

Appraisals/ Regulating doctors 8 2 3 3 5 3 - 3 3 4 - - 1 2 4 *8% 9% 6% 12% 8% 14% - 35% 17% 6% - - 36% 39% 7% 4%

Administrative tasks/ paperwork/ Bureaucraticexercises 7 1 3 2 5 1 2 - 2 4 1 - - - 3 1

7% 4% 7% 9% 7% 7% 21% - 11% 6% 20% - - - 6% 10%

Patient Complaints/ rights, patients family issues 5 2 4 - 4 1 - - - 5 - - - - 4 16% 7% 8% - 6% 8% - - - 7% - - - - 7% 11%

Response to every complaint 2 - 1 1 * 2 - * * 2 - - - * * 13% - 3% 4% 1% 11% - 5% 3% 3% - - - 9% 1% 11%

Prosecuting and controlling doctors/ Stigmatisingdoctors 2 - 2 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 - - - - - 1

2% - 3% 2% - 4% 8% - 4% 2% - - - - - 6%

Education/ Training 2 - - 2 1 * - * * 1 - - - * 1 -2% - - 8% 2% 3% - 5% 3% 2% - - - 9% 3% -

Social media usage 2 - 1 1 2 - 1 - 1 1 1 - - - 1 -2% - 3% 3% 3% - 6% - 3% 2% 10% - - - 2% -

Investigation of unfiltered complaints 1 - - 1 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1 -1% - - 3% 1% - - - - 1% - - - - 1% -

Other 9 3 5 2 7 2 1 - 1 8 1 - - - 5 210% 14% 10% 7% 11% 9% 13% - 7% 11% 20% - - - 10% 12%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 153

Page 163: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 132/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI9. Where do you think the GMC should be focusing less of its attention?Base: All doctors who have had direct contact with the GMC in the last 12 months and disagree that the GMC is focusing on the right issues as a regulator

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% *a b *c d *e *f *g *h i *j *k *l *m n *oSignificance Level: 95% *A B *C D *E *F *G *H I *J *K *L *M N *O

Unweighted Total 95 18 49 27 64 18 13 11 24 71 9 - 3 7 52 11

Weighted Total 93 22 47 23 62 18 10 9 19 73 7 - 3 5 52 13100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100%

Nothing 1 - - 1 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1 -2% - - 6% 2% - - - - 2% - - - - 3% -

Don't know 26 5 19 2 18 4 5 4 9 17 3 - 2 1 13 328% 24% 41% 8% 30% 22% 52% 43% 48% 23% 50% - 64% 24% 25% 22%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 154

Page 164: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 133/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI10. If you have visited the GMC's website in the last 12 months, how frequently have you visited it?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

At least once a week 26 5 12 7 12 13 1 15 15 10 1 - 1 13 10 -1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% * 3% 2% 1% 1% - 1% 3% 1% -

ab FI fI

Less than once a week, once a month or more 185 62 92 29 89 76 26 74 100 84 19 4 5 60 65 128% 9% 8% 8% 7% 10% 11% 13% 13% 6% 12% 18% 9% 14% 6% 4%

D I I I

Once every 2 or 3 months 586 202 304 71 330 203 66 171 237 349 52 4 20 137 258 6125% 28% 25% 20% 25% 27% 29% 31% 30% 23% 32% 19% 33% 31% 24% 22%

C C I I I

Less than once every 2 or 3 months 1014 333 524 143 602 287 93 204 298 716 61 12 27 151 514 12444% 46% 44% 41% 46% 39% 41% 37% 38% 47% 38% 48% 44% 35% 47% 45%

c E fGH

NA - have not visited the GMC website in the last 12months 330 68 179 79 214 86 25 47 73 257 17 2 6 39 191 46

14% 9% 15% 23% 16% 12% 11% 9% 9% 17% 11% 7% 10% 9% 17% 16%A AB E FGH

Don't know / can't remember 166 51 90 19 67 75 19 42 61 106 12 2 3 38 52 357% 7% 8% 5% 5% 10% 8% 8% 8% 7% 8% 8% 4% 9% 5% 13%

D N

NETS

Net: Have visited in the last 12 month 1810 601 931 251 1033 578 186 464 651 1160 133 20 53 361 847 19778% 83% 78% 72% 79% 78% 81% 84% 83% 76% 82% 85% 86% 82% 78% 71%

BC C i I I O

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 155

Page 165: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 134/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI11_SUM. And in general how would you rate the GMC's website in terms of...

SUMMARY TABLEBase: All who have used the GMC website in the last year

NETS Total Very good Fairly good Neither good nor poor Fairly poor Very poor Don't know Good Poor Mean

The accessibility of the GMC's website 1810 410 959 264 82 27 69 1369 109 3.94100% 23% 53% 15% 5% 1% 4% 76% 6%

The relevance of information on the GMC website 1810 300 1003 341 50 15 101 1303 65 3.89100% 17% 55% 19% 3% 1% 6% 72% 4%

The usefulness of information on the GMC website 1810 303 989 347 62 16 92 1292 79 3.87100% 17% 55% 19% 3% 1% 5% 71% 4%

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 156

Page 166: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 135/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI11_1. And in general how would you rate the GMC's website in terms of...

The relevance of information on the GMC websiteBase: All who have used the GMC website in the last year

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1807 524 956 303 991 635 214 522 736 1071 152 28 59 411 780 196

Weighted Total 1810 601 931 251 1033 578 186 464 651 1160 133 20 53 361 847 197100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very good (5) 300 87 165 45 142 127 51 130 180 119 34 9 14 104 94 1417% 15% 18% 18% 14% 22% 27% 28% 28% 10% 26% 43% 26% 29% 11% 7%

D I I I

Fairly good (4) 1003 326 520 141 587 318 104 264 368 635 77 9 32 204 479 10655% 54% 56% 56% 57% 55% 56% 57% 57% 55% 58% 42% 60% 56% 57% 53%

Neither good nor poor (3) 341 112 175 48 200 89 26 52 78 263 19 2 3 41 178 4619% 19% 19% 19% 19% 15% 14% 11% 12% 23% 14% 11% 5% 11% 21% 23%

E FGH

Fairly poor (2) 50 26 19 5 29 13 1 7 8 43 1 - 2 4 26 93% 4% 2% 2% 3% 2% * 1% 1% 4% 1% - 4% 1% 3% 5%

Bc FGH m

Very poor (1) 15 7 5 3 6 3 3 - 3 12 1 * - - 5 31% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - * 1% 1% 2% - - 1% 1%

Gh G

Don't know 101 45 47 10 69 29 2 11 13 88 1 1 2 9 65 196% 7% 5% 4% 7% 5% 1% 2% 2% 8% 1% 3% 5% 2% 8% 10%

bC FGH

NETS

Net: Good 1303 413 686 186 729 444 154 394 548 755 111 17 46 307 572 12072% 69% 74% 74% 71% 77% 83% 85% 84% 65% 83% 85% 86% 85% 68% 61%

A D I I I o

Net: Poor 65 32 24 8 35 17 4 7 10 55 2 * 2 4 31 124% 5% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 1% 2% 5% 2% 2% 4% 1% 4% 6%

B fGH m

Mean score 3.89 3.83 3.93 3.91 3.86 4.00 4.08 4.14 4.12 3.75 4.08 4.27 4.14 4.16 3.81 3.67A D I I I O

Standard deviation .75 .79 .72 .75 .72 .74 .75 .67 .69 .75 .71 .84 .69 .66 .71 .77Standard error .02 .04 .02 .04 .02 .03 .05 .03 .03 .02 .06 .16 .09 .03 .03 .06

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 157

Page 167: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 136/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI11_2. And in general how would you rate the GMC's website in terms of...

The usefulness of information on the GMC websiteBase: All who have used the GMC website in the last year

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1807 524 956 303 991 635 214 522 736 1071 152 28 59 411 780 196

Weighted Total 1810 601 931 251 1033 578 186 464 651 1160 133 20 53 361 847 197100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very good (5) 303 85 175 42 137 135 50 140 189 114 34 9 14 112 89 1417% 14% 19% 17% 13% 23% 27% 30% 29% 10% 25% 43% 26% 31% 11% 7%

A D I I I

Fairly good (4) 989 332 498 142 591 301 104 249 353 635 78 9 29 193 484 9955% 55% 53% 57% 57% 52% 56% 54% 54% 55% 58% 45% 55% 54% 57% 50%

E o

Neither good nor poor (3) 347 108 187 43 194 103 23 56 79 269 16 1 6 43 173 6019% 18% 20% 17% 19% 18% 12% 12% 12% 23% 12% 5% 11% 12% 20% 30%

FGH N

Fairly poor (2) 62 27 24 12 38 12 3 7 9 53 1 - - 5 37 63% 4% 3% 5% 4% 2% 1% 1% 1% 5% 1% - - 1% 4% 3%

B b e FGH

Very poor (1) 16 7 6 4 8 3 3 - 3 13 2 * - - 6 31% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% 2% - - 1% 1%

Gh g G

Don't know 92 43 42 8 65 24 4 12 16 76 2 1 4 7 59 165% 7% 5% 3% 6% 4% 2% 3% 3% 7% 2% 6% 7% 2% 7% 8%

BC e FGH M

NETS

Net: Good 1292 417 673 184 727 436 153 389 542 750 112 18 43 306 573 11371% 69% 72% 74% 70% 75% 82% 84% 83% 65% 84% 88% 82% 85% 68% 57%

D I I I O

Net: Poor 79 33 30 15 46 15 6 7 13 66 3 * - 5 43 94% 6% 3% 6% 4% 3% 3% 1% 2% 6% 3% 2% - 1% 5% 5%

B B E g GH

Mean score 3.87 3.83 3.91 3.85 3.84 4.00 4.06 4.16 4.13 3.72 4.07 4.34 4.17 4.17 3.78 3.63A D I I I O

Standard deviation .77 .78 .75 .81 .74 .75 .79 .69 .72 .76 .74 .78 .62 .69 .74 .74Standard error .02 .04 .02 .05 .02 .03 .05 .03 .03 .02 .06 .15 .08 .03 .03 .06

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 158

Page 168: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 137/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI11_3. And in general how would you rate the GMC's website in terms of...

The accessibility of the GMC's websiteBase: All who have used the GMC website in the last year

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total35 andunder 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMG

Net: OutsideUK UK White BME White BME White BME

Significance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j *k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J *K L M N O

Unweighted Total 1807 524 956 303 991 635 214 522 736 1071 152 28 59 411 780 196

Weighted Total 1810 601 931 251 1033 578 186 464 651 1160 133 20 53 361 847 197100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Very good (5) 410 118 235 55 193 166 64 172 235 174 45 10 16 137 131 2023% 20% 25% 22% 19% 29% 34% 37% 36% 15% 34% 49% 31% 38% 16% 10%

A D I I I o

Fairly good (4) 959 317 482 141 570 296 94 238 332 627 69 7 27 188 474 10153% 53% 52% 56% 55% 51% 51% 51% 51% 54% 52% 37% 51% 52% 56% 51%

Neither good nor poor (3) 264 100 125 33 162 69 20 34 54 210 15 2 5 25 143 4215% 17% 13% 13% 16% 12% 11% 7% 8% 18% 11% 10% 9% 7% 17% 21%

E FGH

Fairly poor (2) 82 31 40 11 46 20 4 13 16 66 2 * - 10 44 105% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 2% 3% 3% 6% 2% 2% - 3% 5% 5%

FGH

Very poor (1) 27 10 14 4 16 6 2 4 6 21 1 - 3 1 12 51% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% - 6% * 1% 3%

M

Don't know 69 26 36 7 46 20 2 4 6 62 1 1 2 1 43 194% 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 5% 1% 3% 3% * 5% 10%

FGH M N

NETS

Net: Good 1369 434 717 196 763 463 158 409 567 801 114 17 44 325 605 12176% 72% 77% 78% 74% 80% 85% 88% 87% 69% 85% 85% 83% 90% 71% 61%

A a D I I I l O

Net: Poor 109 41 53 14 62 27 6 17 23 86 3 * 3 11 56 156% 7% 6% 6% 6% 5% 3% 4% 4% 7% 3% 2% 6% 3% 7% 8%

FGH

Mean score 3.94 3.87 3.99 3.96 3.89 4.07 4.16 4.22 4.20 3.79 4.16 4.36 4.06 4.25 3.83 3.67A D I I I l O

Standard deviation .84 .86 .85 .82 .82 .82 .79 .77 .78 .85 .76 .77 .97 .72 .81 .86Standard error .02 .04 .03 .05 .03 .03 .05 .03 .03 .03 .06 .15 .13 .04 .03 .06

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 159

Page 169: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 138/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI12. Through which channels would you prefer to receive information from the GMC in future?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Email correspondence 1563 530 784 224 871 540 166 420 586 978 120 20 43 335 707 18568% 73% 65% 64% 66% 73% 72% 76% 75% 64% 74% 81% 70% 77% 65% 67%

BC D I I I

Website 1070 338 556 165 605 364 120 291 411 660 85 12 31 236 490 11546% 47% 46% 47% 46% 49% 52% 53% 52% 43% 52% 51% 50% 54% 45% 41%

I I I

Email bulletins / newsletters 799 167 466 154 476 248 88 183 270 529 65 7 25 144 386 9835% 23% 39% 44% 36% 34% 38% 33% 34% 35% 40% 28% 40% 33% 35% 35%

A Ab

Interactive learning tools, for example, interactivecase studies 565 158 311 91 297 210 60 159 220 345 47 5 15 129 234 76

24% 22% 26% 26% 23% 28% 26% 29% 28% 23% 29% 20% 25% 29% 21% 27%a D I I N

By post 461 124 240 88 251 171 46 142 189 273 33 7 10 120 208 4420% 17% 20% 25% 19% 23% 20% 26% 24% 18% 20% 30% 17% 27% 19% 16%

AB D fI I l

Face to face through GMC events you could attendlocally 459 126 252 73 238 176 43 128 171 288 30 5 5 109 203 61

20% 17% 21% 21% 18% 24% 19% 23% 22% 19% 19% 21% 7% 25% 19% 22%a D I i L

Apps 400 156 211 30 205 159 46 141 187 213 36 5 15 114 154 4017% 22% 18% 9% 16% 22% 20% 25% 24% 14% 22% 22% 25% 26% 14% 14%

BC C D I fI I

Text message 206 86 109 9 84 109 18 85 104 102 17 2 5 72 63 359% 12% 9% 3% 6% 15% 8% 15% 13% 7% 10% 7% 8% 17% 6% 13%

BC C D FI FI l N

Telephone 142 40 77 20 50 77 18 67 85 57 12 3 2 58 35 166% 6% 6% 6% 4% 10% 8% 12% 11% 4% 7% 11% 4% 13% 3% 6%

D I fI I L n

Social media 126 47 75 4 58 60 14 40 54 72 11 2 3 32 43 265% 7% 6% 1% 4% 8% 6% 7% 7% 5% 7% 10% 5% 7% 4% 9%

C C D I I N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 160

Page 170: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 138/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsI12. Through which channels would you prefer to receive information from the GMC in future?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Other 22 9 9 3 11 1 2 1 3 19 - - - 1 11 -1% 1% 1% 1% 1% * 1% * * 1% - - - * 1% -

e Gh

Don't know 52 11 34 7 31 10 2 5 7 46 2 - 1 3 28 72% 2% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% - 1% 1% 3% 3%

a FGH

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 161

Page 171: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 139/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsJ1. What is your ethnic group?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish or British 1074 349 506 208 1074 - 12 27 39 1035 12 - 27 - 1035 -47% 48% 42% 60% 82% - 5% 5% 5% 68% 7% - 44% - 95% -

B AB E FGH M O

Irish 51 19 20 12 51 - 13 2 15 35 13 - 2 - 35 -2% 3% 2% 3% 4% - 6% * 2% 2% 8% - 3% - 3% -

B E GHI G G k M O

Gypsy or Irish Traveller 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - -* - * - * - 1% - * - 1% - - - - -

GI

Any other white background 189 44 120 25 189 - 137 32 169 20 137 - 32 - 20 -8% 6% 10% 7% 14% - 59% 6% 22% 1% 84% - 53% - 2% -

Ac E GHI I GI K M O

Indian 272 76 173 20 - 272 4 171 175 97 - 4 - 171 - 9712% 11% 14% 6% - 37% 2% 31% 22% 6% - 17% - 39% - 35%

C AC D FHI FI F J L N

Pakistani 130 48 68 13 - 130 - 95 95 35 - - - 95 - 356% 7% 6% 4% - 18% - 17% 12% 2% - - - 22% - 12%

C D FHI FI F L N

Bangladeshi 29 14 14 1 - 29 1 16 18 11 - 1 - 16 - 111% 2% 1% * - 4% 1% 3% 2% 1% - 6% - 4% - 4%

C c D FI fI J N

Chinese 54 33 20 1 - 54 - 7 7 48 - - - 7 - 482% 5% 2% * - 7% - 1% 1% 3% - - - 2% - 17%

BC C D f FGH N

Any other Asian/Asian British background 83 31 41 10 - 83 11 38 48 35 - 11 - 38 - 354% 4% 3% 3% - 11% 5% 7% 6% 2% - 44% - 9% - 13%

D I I I J L N

African 65 14 40 11 - 65 2 57 59 6 - 2 - 57 - 63% 2% 3% 3% - 9% 1% 10% 7% * - 7% - 13% - 2%

a D FhI FI J L N

Caribbean 7 1 5 1 - 7 - 5 5 2 - - - 5 - 2* * * * - 1% - 1% 1% * - - - 1% - 1%

D I i N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 162

Page 172: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 139/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsJ1. What is your ethnic group?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Any other Black, African or Caribbean background 1 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* * - * - * - * * - - - - * - -

i

White and Black Caribbean 4 2 2 * - 4 - 2 2 3 - - - 2 - 3* * * * - 1% - * * * - - - * - 1%

D N

White and Black African 5 2 2 1 - 5 - 2 2 3 - - - 2 - 3* * * * - 1% - * * * - - - * - 1%

D N

White and Asian 22 11 11 - - 22 1 3 5 18 - 1 - 3 - 181% 2% 1% - - 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 5% - 1% - 6%

C C D J N

Any other mixed or multiple ethnic background 15 8 7 * - 15 1 2 4 11 - 1 - 2 - 111% 1% 1% * - 2% 1% * * 1% - 6% - 1% - 4%

c D J N

Arab 40 11 23 5 - 40 4 32 36 4 - 4 - 32 - 42% 2% 2% 2% - 5% 2% 6% 5% * - 15% - 7% - 2%

D I FI FI J L N

Any other ethnic group 13 7 4 2 - 13 - 6 6 7 - - - 6 - 71% 1% * 1% - 2% - 1% 1% * - - - 1% - 2%

D fi N

Would rather not say 252 53 142 38 - - 43 55 98 153 - - - - - -11% 7% 12% 11% - - 19% 10% 13% 10% - - - - - -

A A GHI i

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 163

Page 173: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 140/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsJ2. The Equality Act 2010 defines a person as disabled if they have a physical or mental impairment, which has a substantial and long-term (i.e. has lasted or is expected tolast at least 12 months) and adverse effect on the person's ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. Do you have a disability, long-term illness or health condition?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 85 21 51 14 46 32 9 19 29 57 5 2 3 14 39 164% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 8% 4% 3% 4% 6%

n

No 2081 656 1088 313 1211 685 210 511 721 1359 154 21 56 411 1001 25390% 91% 91% 90% 92% 93% 91% 92% 92% 89% 94% 89% 92% 94% 92% 91%

I I

Prefer not to say 140 44 61 21 57 23 11 23 34 106 5 1 2 13 50 96% 6% 5% 6% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4% 7% 3% 4% 4% 3% 5% 3%

GH

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 164

Page 174: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 141/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsJ3. What is your religion?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

No religion 526 198 252 73 442 72 42 33 75 451 36 2 19 13 386 5623% 27% 21% 21% 34% 10% 18% 6% 10% 30% 22% 9% 31% 3% 35% 20%

BC E GH G FGH k M O

Christian (this includes any Christian denominatione.g. Baptist, Protestant, Presbyterian, Catholic,Church of England/Scotland/Ireland) 903 264 463 171 729 149 125 110 235 668 112 5 25 80 592 64

39% 37% 39% 49% 55% 20% 54% 20% 30% 44% 69% 20% 41% 18% 54% 23%AB E GHI G GH K M O

Buddhist 49 18 27 4 8 41 2 19 21 28 - 2 1 17 7 212% 2% 2% 1% 1% 6% 1% 3% 3% 2% - 9% 1% 4% 1% 8%

D FI J N

Hindu 208 58 130 16 - 208 5 141 146 62 - 5 - 141 - 629% 8% 11% 5% - 28% 2% 25% 19% 4% - 23% - 32% - 22%

C aC D FHI FI J L N

Jewish 31 15 11 4 31 - 5 3 8 23 5 - 3 - 23 -1% 2% 1% 1% 2% - 2% 1% 1% 2% 3% - 5% - 2% -

B E g g M O

Muslim 244 80 140 24 9 234 6 177 183 61 - 6 6 170 3 5811% 11% 12% 7% 1% 32% 3% 32% 23% 4% - 26% 10% 39% * 21%

C C D FHI FI J L N

Sikh 5 2 3 - - 5 - 2 2 3 - - - 2 - 3* * * - - 1% - * * * - - - * - 1%

D N

Any other religion 12 5 4 3 10 2 1 2 3 9 1 - 2 1 8 11% 1% * 1% 1% * * * * 1% * - 3% * 1% *

M

Would rather not say 328 82 170 53 86 31 44 67 111 217 9 3 5 15 71 1314% 11% 14% 15% 7% 4% 19% 12% 14% 14% 6% 12% 9% 3% 7% 5%

a a E GhI M

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 165

Page 175: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 142/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsJ4. Which of the following options best describes your sexual orientation?Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Bisexual 36 9 23 5 18 13 2 11 13 23 2 - 1 10 15 32% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% - 1% 2% 1% 1%

Gay man 44 16 21 7 34 8 3 5 8 36 3 - 2 3 29 52% 2% 2% 2% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% - 4% 1% 3% 2%

E GH M

Gay woman/ Lesbian 12 5 5 2 11 2 1 1 2 10 1 - - 1 9 11% 1% * * 1% * 1% * * 1% 1% - - * 1% *

e g

Heterosexual/ Straight 1902 596 1007 285 1111 649 191 472 663 1239 139 21 54 380 918 24783% 83% 84% 82% 85% 88% 83% 85% 85% 81% 85% 89% 88% 87% 84% 89%

D I I n

Other 7 2 2 3 3 1 - 2 2 5 - - 1 1 3 -* * * 1% * * - * * * - - 1% * * -

b

Would rather not say 304 93 142 48 137 67 33 63 96 209 17 3 4 42 116 2213% 13% 12% 14% 10% 9% 14% 11% 12% 14% 11% 11% 6% 10% 11% 8%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 166

Page 176: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 143/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsS2. Which of the following best describes your current role?Base: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Consultant 718 74 473 157 450 182 84 176 260 459 62 4 28 131 360 4731% 10% 39% 45% 34% 25% 36% 32% 33% 30% 38% 17% 45% 30% 33% 17%

A AB E I K M O

Trainee (on an HEE training programme) 548 300 200 43 290 202 46 124 170 378 28 10 8 102 255 9024% 42% 17% 12% 22% 27% 20% 22% 22% 25% 17% 40% 13% 23% 23% 32%

BC C D fh J L N

Foundation stage 159 123 29 5 97 48 6 18 24 135 5 1 2 15 89 337% 17% 2% 1% 7% 7% 3% 3% 3% 9% 3% 2% 4% 3% 8% 12%

BC FGH n

Medical student - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

GP 480 90 295 82 288 132 43 80 123 357 27 5 13 58 248 6921% 13% 25% 23% 22% 18% 19% 14% 16% 23% 17% 20% 22% 13% 23% 25%

A A E g fGH m

Other (e.g. Staff Grade, Associate Specialist, TrustGrade etc.) 400 133 203 62 190 176 52 156 208 193 41 5 10 132 139 39

17% 19% 17% 18% 14% 24% 22% 28% 26% 13% 25% 21% 16% 30% 13% 14%D I fI I L

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 167

Page 177: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 144/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsS3. Which of the following sectors, if any, do you work in currently? As a note, by 'the NHS' we are also referring to the Health and Social Care system in Northern Ireland.Base: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

In the NHS - for a primary care provider / in theprimary care setting 664 182 368 105 376 202 66 142 208 457 48 4 17 106 311 92

29% 25% 31% 30% 29% 27% 29% 26% 27% 30% 29% 18% 28% 24% 28% 33%A a Gh

In the NHS - for a secondary care provider 1081 392 529 141 603 368 103 263 366 715 72 13 27 213 504 14247% 54% 44% 40% 46% 50% 45% 48% 47% 47% 44% 55% 44% 49% 46% 51%

BC d

In the NHS - for a tertiary care provider 564 177 308 72 328 188 53 151 203 361 38 5 17 124 272 5824% 24% 26% 21% 25% 25% 23% 27% 26% 24% 24% 22% 28% 28% 25% 21%

C i

In the private / independent sector 262 52 137 67 166 61 31 46 77 185 22 1 12 31 132 3011% 7% 11% 19% 13% 8% 14% 8% 10% 12% 13% 5% 20% 7% 12% 11%

A AB E Gh Gh M

Other (please write in) 95 17 52 26 75 15 4 7 11 84 4 - 2 6 70 94% 2% 4% 7% 6% 2% 2% 1% 1% 6% 2% - 3% 1% 6% 3%

A AB E FGH o

None of the above 13 4 4 5 8 4 2 3 5 8 - 1 - 2 8 -1% 1% * 1% 1% * 1% 1% 1% 1% - 5% - 1% 1% -

B J

Prefer not to say 8 1 4 - 3 3 4 3 7 2 2 1 - 2 1 -* * * - * * 2% * 1% * 1% 4% - * * -

gI I

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 168

Page 178: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 145/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsS4. And what is the basis of your principal work role?Base: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Full time (substantive post) 1429 523 725 162 797 497 139 361 500 929 99 17 38 298 660 18262% 73% 60% 47% 61% 67% 60% 65% 64% 61% 61% 69% 61% 68% 61% 65%

BC C D i

Part time (substantive post) 399 87 221 81 253 88 36 80 115 283 27 1 10 55 216 3217% 12% 18% 23% 19% 12% 15% 14% 15% 19% 17% 3% 16% 12% 20% 12%

A AB E GH K O

Locum 214 48 116 45 107 73 28 58 86 128 15 4 4 46 88 229% 7% 10% 13% 8% 10% 12% 11% 11% 8% 9% 17% 6% 11% 8% 8%

A Ab i I

Medico-legal professional 7 1 2 3 6 1 - 2 2 5 - - 1 1 5 -* * * 1% * * - * * * - - 2% * * -

b m

Academic 54 17 30 6 31 22 5 9 14 40 4 1 - 9 26 122% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% - 2% 2% 4%

n

Self-employed 160 28 92 39 97 45 18 36 54 105 13 1 9 23 75 217% 4% 8% 11% 7% 6% 8% 7% 7% 7% 8% 4% 15% 5% 7% 8%

A AB M

Unemployed 3 1 1 - - 3 1 - 1 1 - 1 - - - 1* * * - - * 1% - * * - 5% - - - 1%

D g J N

Other 34 13 9 12 23 9 4 4 8 26 4 - - 3 19 61% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% - - 1% 2% 2%

B aB g

Prefer not to say 7 3 3 1 * 4 - 3 3 4 - - - 2 * 2* * * * * 1% - 1% * * - - - 1% * 1%

D n

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 169

Page 179: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 146/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsS5. Are you...Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Male 1252 398 631 210 675 448 129 353 481 770 89 19 39 284 547 14454% 55% 53% 60% 51% 61% 56% 64% 61% 51% 55% 81% 64% 65% 50% 52%

B D FI I J

Female 1022 321 557 136 633 288 96 194 291 732 73 5 21 151 539 13244% 45% 46% 39% 48% 39% 42% 35% 37% 48% 45% 19% 35% 35% 49% 47%

c C E g fGH K

Would rather not say 32 2 13 2 7 4 5 7 12 20 1 - 1 2 5 31% * 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% - 2% * * 1%

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 170

Page 180: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 147/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsS6. And in terms of age are you...Base: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

25 and under 54 54 - - 33 18 1 3 5 49 1 - - 3 32 152% 7% - - 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% - - 1% 3% 5%

BC FGH n

26 to 35 667 667 - - 377 239 45 107 151 516 35 7 9 92 334 14129% 93% - - 29% 32% 19% 19% 19% 34% 21% 27% 14% 21% 31% 51%

BC d FGH N

36 to 45 689 - 689 - 313 290 80 242 322 367 49 12 17 196 247 8130% - 57% - 24% 39% 35% 44% 41% 24% 30% 51% 28% 45% 23% 29%

AC D I FI fI J L N

46 to 55 511 - 511 - 334 121 64 120 185 326 50 4 20 87 264 3022% - 43% - 25% 16% 28% 22% 24% 21% 31% 17% 33% 20% 24% 11%

AC E GI M O

56 to 65 295 - - 295 208 52 30 54 84 210 24 1 9 42 176 813% - - 85% 16% 7% 13% 10% 11% 14% 15% 5% 14% 10% 16% 3%

AB E GH O

66 to 75 49 - - 49 35 12 3 16 19 30 2 - 5 10 27 22% - - 14% 3% 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% 1% - 9% 2% 2% 1%

AB M o

Over 75 5 - - 5 2 2 - 2 2 2 - - - 2 2 -* - - 1% * * - * * * - - - 1% * -

AB

Would rather not say 36 - - - 11 6 7 9 16 20 2 - 1 5 8 12% - - - 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% *

I

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 171

Page 181: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 148/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsS8. In which of the following UK countries are you currently mainly working/studyingBase: All doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

England 1966 613 1022 295 1110 638 195 476 672 1294 139 17 52 379 919 24185% 85% 85% 85% 84% 86% 85% 86% 86% 85% 85% 73% 85% 87% 84% 87%

k

Wales 96 34 50 13 46 40 13 23 36 60 6 5 1 19 39 164% 5% 4% 4% 3% 5% 6% 4% 5% 4% 3% 20% 1% 4% 4% 6%

D J

Scotland 156 55 76 25 103 39 13 29 42 115 11 1 5 20 87 187% 8% 6% 7% 8% 5% 6% 5% 5% 8% 7% 5% 8% 5% 8% 6%

E gH

Northern Ireland 88 19 53 16 56 24 9 26 35 53 8 1 4 20 44 34% 3% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 5% 4% 3% 5% 2% 6% 5% 4% 1%

a O

None of these - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 172

Page 182: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 149/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsEthnicity from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Asian or Asian British 530 198 288 34 5 494 15 306 321 209 - 14 3 293 2 18723% 27% 24% 10% * 67% 6% 55% 41% 14% - 59% 5% 67% * 67%

bC C D FHI FI F J L N

Black or Black British 69 16 41 11 1 63 1 57 58 11 - 1 - 53 1 93% 2% 3% 3% * 8% 1% 10% 7% 1% - 5% - 12% * 3%

D FHI FI J L N

Mixed 46 21 22 3 3 40 3 13 16 30 - 3 1 10 3 272% 3% 2% 1% * 5% 1% 2% 2% 2% - 11% 1% 2% * 10%

C D J N

White 1222 391 602 216 1157 5 167 54 222 1001 145 1 46 2 966 353% 54% 50% 62% 88% 1% 72% 10% 28% 66% 89% 3% 76% * 89% 1%

b AB E GHI G GH K M O

Other Ethnic Groups 69 30 30 8 6 51 4 36 40 29 1 3 2 30 3 193% 4% 3% 2% * 7% 2% 7% 5% 2% * 13% 4% 7% * 7%

B D FI FI J N

Not stated 369 64 216 77 143 88 41 87 127 241 17 2 9 50 116 3516% 9% 18% 22% 11% 12% 18% 16% 16% 16% 11% 8% 15% 11% 11% 13%

A Ab

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 173

Page 183: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 150/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsSegmentBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

5 374 124 192 53 222 108 23 70 93 281 14 2 11 54 197 5216% 17% 16% 15% 17% 15% 10% 13% 12% 18% 9% 7% 18% 12% 18% 19%

FGH

6 566 169 283 99 331 131 52 71 123 443 27 6 13 43 291 8125% 23% 24% 29% 25% 18% 23% 13% 16% 29% 17% 26% 21% 10% 27% 29%

aB E GH FGH M

3 305 115 144 45 177 106 33 91 124 181 26 4 8 72 143 3113% 16% 12% 13% 13% 14% 14% 16% 16% 12% 16% 15% 13% 16% 13% 11%

B I I

2 138 43 83 12 65 64 19 56 75 63 16 3 3 50 46 126% 6% 7% 4% 5% 9% 8% 10% 10% 4% 10% 12% 5% 11% 4% 4%

c C D I I I

4 467 155 234 68 269 157 41 111 153 314 29 3 11 89 229 6420% 22% 19% 20% 20% 21% 18% 20% 19% 21% 18% 13% 19% 20% 21% 23%

1 455 114 265 70 250 174 62 154 216 239 51 6 14 129 185 3820% 16% 22% 20% 19% 23% 27% 28% 28% 16% 31% 27% 24% 30% 17% 14%

A a D I I I

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 174

Page 184: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 151/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsSample TypeBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

GP Register 576 81 362 122 362 133 43 74 117 459 30 4 14 53 318 7625% 11% 30% 35% 28% 18% 19% 13% 15% 30% 18% 16% 23% 12% 29% 27%

A Ab E G FGH M

Specialist Register 692 23 485 166 462 153 108 132 240 452 78 4 23 95 361 5430% 3% 40% 48% 35% 21% 47% 24% 31% 30% 48% 18% 37% 22% 33% 19%

A AB E GHI G G K M O

Both GP and Specialist 23 - 13 10 20 1 3 1 3 20 2 - - 1 18 11% - 1% 3% 2% * 1% * * 1% 1% - - * 2% *

A AB E G GH o

None 1015 617 341 50 471 453 77 347 423 591 53 16 25 289 393 14844% 86% 28% 14% 36% 61% 33% 63% 54% 39% 33% 65% 40% 66% 36% 53%

BC C D FHI FI f J L N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 175

Page 185: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 152/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsGender from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Male 1268 398 639 210 677 448 132 356 488 781 89 19 40 284 548 14455% 55% 53% 60% 51% 61% 57% 64% 62% 51% 55% 81% 65% 65% 50% 52%

B D i FI I J

Female 1038 323 562 139 637 292 99 197 296 741 74 5 21 153 542 13445% 45% 47% 40% 49% 39% 43% 36% 38% 49% 45% 19% 35% 35% 50% 48%

C E G fGH K

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 176

Page 186: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 153/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsYear Qualified from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Pre 2011 1951 379 1190 348 1094 630 207 530 737 1215 146 20 61 415 887 19585% 53% 99% 100% 83% 85% 90% 96% 94% 80% 90% 84% 100% 95% 81% 70%

A Ab I FI FI m O

2011 or later 355 342 10 - 220 110 24 23 48 307 17 4 - 23 203 8415% 47% 1% - 17% 15% 10% 4% 6% 20% 10% 16% - 5% 19% 30%

BC c GH FGH l N

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 177

Page 187: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 154/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsUK_NATION from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

England 1937 620 1003 283 1089 646 192 470 663 1274 139 18 48 378 902 24984% 86% 84% 81% 83% 87% 83% 85% 85% 84% 85% 76% 78% 86% 83% 89%

C D l N

Northern Ireland 69 18 33 18 46 16 5 15 20 49 5 - 1 14 40 33% 2% 3% 5% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% - 1% 3% 4% 1%

AB e O

Scotland 208 59 116 30 130 47 22 45 67 141 13 2 9 30 108 159% 8% 10% 9% 10% 6% 9% 8% 9% 9% 8% 10% 15% 7% 10% 5%

E M O

Wales 92 25 49 17 49 31 11 23 34 58 6 3 4 16 39 124% 3% 4% 5% 4% 4% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 14% 6% 4% 4% 4%

J

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 178

Page 188: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 155/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsAGE_RANGE_CODED from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

29 and under 369 367 - - 221 120 21 39 60 309 17 3 1 36 203 8116% 51% - - 17% 16% 9% 7% 8% 20% 10% 11% 2% 8% 19% 29%

BC FGH l N

30 - 39 years 715 354 350 - 340 301 63 200 264 451 46 11 14 162 281 12831% 49% 29% - 26% 41% 27% 36% 34% 30% 28% 45% 22% 37% 26% 46%

BC C D FI fI j L N

40 - 49 years 600 - 589 - 330 196 73 182 255 344 47 7 22 144 261 4526% - 49% - 25% 27% 32% 33% 33% 23% 29% 31% 36% 33% 24% 16%

AC I I I O

50 - 59 years 438 - 260 167 292 86 61 84 144 294 44 3 12 62 236 2019% - 22% 48% 22% 12% 26% 15% 18% 19% 27% 14% 19% 14% 22% 7%

A AB E GHI g G O

60 - 69 years 161 - 1 158 118 27 12 37 50 112 10 - 10 24 99 37% - * 45% 9% 4% 5% 7% 6% 7% 6% - 16% 6% 9% 1%

AB E M O

70+ years 23 - - 23 13 10 1 11 12 12 1 - 2 9 10 11% - - 7% 1% 1% * 2% 1% 1% * - 4% 2% 1% *

AB fI i

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 179

Page 189: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 156/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsPMQ_REGION_CODE from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

EEA 231 46 145 33 163 24 231 - 231 - 163 24 - - - -10% 6% 12% 9% 12% 3% 100% - 29% - 100% 100% - - - -

A a E GHI GI

IMG 553 110 362 72 61 437 - 553 553 - - - 61 437 - -24% 15% 30% 21% 5% 59% - 100% 71% - - - 100% 100% - -

AC A D FHI FI

UK 1522 565 693 243 1090 279 - - - 1522 - - - - 1090 27966% 78% 58% 70% 83% 38% - - - 100% - - - - 100% 100%

BC B E FGH

None - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 180

Page 190: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 157/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsPLACE_OF_QUALIFICATION_CODE from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Afghanistan 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

Albania 1 - 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - - - 1 - - -* - * - * - - * * - - - 1% - - -

M

Algeria - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Argentina 2 1 1 - 2 - - 2 2 - - - 2 - - -* * * - * - - * * - - - 3% - - -

I i M

Armenia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australia 9 1 7 1 5 3 - 9 9 - - - 5 3 - -* * 1% * * * - 2% 1% - - - 8% 1% - -

FI fI M

Austria 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - 1 - - 1 - - - -* - * - - * * - * - - 3% - - - -

i J

Azerbaijan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Bahrain - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Bangladesh 17 5 11 1 - 17 - 17 17 - - - - 17 - -1% 1% 1% * - 2% - 3% 2% - - - - 4% - -

D FI FI l

Belarus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Belgium 2 2 - * 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - - - - -* * - * * - 1% - * - 1% - - - - -

b GI I

Bolivia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 181

Page 191: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 157/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsPLACE_OF_QUALIFICATION_CODE from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Bosnia And Herzegovina 1 - 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - - - 1 - - -* - * - * - - * * - - - 2% - - -

M

Brazil 1 1 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* * * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

i

Bulgaria 8 - 6 2 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - - - - -* - 1% 1% 1% - 4% - 1% - 5% - - - - -

a A E GHI GI

Burundi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Cameroon * - - * - * - * * - - - - * - -* - - * - * - * * - - - - * - -

Canada 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 - - - 1 1 - -* * - * * * - * * - - - 1% * - -

i

Cayman Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Chile - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

China 6 4 2 - - 6 - 6 6 - - - - 6 - -* 1% * - - 1% - 1% 1% - - - - 1% - -

D I I

Colombia * - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

Congo, The Dem Republic of The 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

Costa Rica - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Croatia 3 - 3 - 2 - 3 - 3 - 2 - - - - -* - * - * - 1% - * - 1% - - - - -

GhI I

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 182

Page 192: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 157/3

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsPLACE_OF_QUALIFICATION_CODE from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Cuba 2 - 2 - * 1 - 2 2 - - - * 1 - -* - * - * * - * * - - - 1% * - -

I i

Czech Republic 11 3 5 1 5 3 11 - 11 - 5 3 - - - -* * * * * * 5% - 1% - 3% 14% - - - -

GHI GI J

Denmark - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dominica - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dominican Republic 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

Ecuador 1 - 1 - - * - 1 1 - - - - * - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

Egypt 24 4 16 4 2 19 - 24 24 - - - 2 19 - -1% 1% 1% 1% * 3% - 4% 3% - - - 3% 4% - -

D FI FI

Estonia 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - -* - * - * - * - * - 1% - - - - -

gI

Ethiopia 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

Finland - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

France 4 1 1 2 2 1 4 - 4 - 2 1 - - - -* * * * * * 2% - * - 1% 5% - - - -

GhI gI

Georgia 1 - 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - - - 1 - - -* - * - * - - * * - - - 2% - - -

M

Germany 23 - 17 3 15 - 23 - 23 - 15 - - - - -1% - 1% 1% 1% - 10% - 3% - 9% - - - - -

A A E GHI GI k

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 183

Page 193: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 157/4

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsPLACE_OF_QUALIFICATION_CODE from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Ghana 3 1 2 1 - 3 - 3 3 - - - - 3 - -* * * * - * - 1% * - - - - 1% - -

D I I

Greece 29 10 17 2 24 - 29 - 29 - 24 - - - - -1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 12% - 4% - 15% - - - - -

E GHI GI K

Grenada 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

Guatemala - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Guyana - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Haiti - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hong Kong - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hungary 11 1 9 2 7 2 11 - 11 - 7 2 - - - -* * 1% 1% 1% * 5% - 1% - 4% 8% - - - -

a GHI GI

Iceland 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - -* - * - * - * - * - * - - - - -

I

India 173 28 125 15 6 152 - 173 173 - - - 6 152 - -7% 4% 10% 4% * 21% - 31% 22% - - - 10% 35% - -

AC D FHI FI L

Iran, Islamic Republic Of 7 1 6 - 1 4 - 7 7 - - - 1 4 - -* * 1% - * 1% - 1% 1% - - - 1% 1% - -

D fI I

Iraq 24 3 14 8 3 14 - 24 24 - - - 3 14 - -1% * 1% 2% * 2% - 4% 3% - - - 6% 3% - -

a A D FI FI

Ireland 29 6 12 10 18 4 29 - 29 - 18 4 - - - -1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 13% - 4% - 11% 18% - - - -

AB e GHI GI

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 184

Page 194: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 157/5

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsPLACE_OF_QUALIFICATION_CODE from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Israel - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Italy 18 10 4 4 18 1 18 - 18 - 18 1 - - - -1% 1% * 1% 1% * 8% - 2% - 11% 3% - - - -

B b E GHI GI

Jamaica 6 - 6 - - 5 - 6 6 - - - - 5 - -* - * - - 1% - 1% 1% - - - - 1% - -

a D fI I

Japan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Jordan 2 1 1 - - 1 - 2 2 - - - - 1 - -* * * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

I i

Kazakhstan 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

i

Kenya 1 1 - - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* * - - - * - * * - - - - * - -

i

Kuwait - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Kyrgyzstan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Latvia 6 3 3 - 3 3 6 - 6 - 3 3 - - - -* * * - * * 3% - 1% - 2% 12% - - - -

GHI GI J

Lebanon - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Liberia 1 - - 1 - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - - * - * - * * - - - - * - -

Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 5 2 1 2 * 5 - 5 5 - - - * 5 - -* * * 1% * 1% - 1% 1% - - - 1% 1% - -

b D I I

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 185

Page 195: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 157/6

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsPLACE_OF_QUALIFICATION_CODE from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Lithuania 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - - - - -* - * - * - 1% - * - 1% - - - - -

GI i

Macedonia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Malawi 2 - 2 - 1 1 - 2 2 - - - 1 1 - -* - * - * * - * * - - - 1% * - -

I i

Malaysia 5 - 3 1 - 5 - 5 5 - - - - 5 - -* - * * - 1% - 1% 1% - - - - 1% - -

D I I

Malta 5 1 4 - 3 1 5 - 5 - 3 1 - - - -* * * - * * 2% - 1% - 2% 2% - - - -

GHI GI

Mexico * - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

Moldova, Republic Of - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Myanmar 6 - 6 - - 5 - 6 6 - - - - 5 - -* - * - - 1% - 1% 1% - - - - 1% - -

a D I I

Nepal 6 4 2 - - 6 - 6 6 - - - - 6 - -* * * - - 1% - 1% 1% - - - - 1% - -

D fI I

Netherlands 9 - 6 3 6 1 9 - 9 - 6 1 - - - -* - * 1% * * 4% - 1% - 3% 6% - - - -

a A GHI GI

New Zealand 6 - 3 2 4 - - 6 6 - - - 4 - - -* - * 1% * - - 1% 1% - - - 6% - - -

a fI I M

Nigeria 47 8 32 6 - 41 - 47 47 - - - - 41 - -2% 1% 3% 2% - 6% - 8% 6% - - - - 9% - -

A D FhI FI L

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 186

Page 196: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 157/7

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsPLACE_OF_QUALIFICATION_CODE from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Norway 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - -* - * * * - 1% - * - 1% - - - - -

gI

Oman 1 1 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* * * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

i

Pakistan 100 32 54 12 3 94 - 100 100 - - - 3 94 - -4% 4% 5% 4% * 13% - 18% 13% - - - 5% 21% - -

D FHI FI L

Palestinian Territories - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Panama - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Papua New Guinea - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Peru 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 - - - 1 - - -* * - - * - - * * - - - 1% - - -

M

Philippines 5 - 5 - - 2 - 5 5 - - - - 2 - -* - * - - * - 1% 1% - - - - * - -

d I I

Poland 19 1 16 1 13 3 19 - 19 - 13 3 - - - -1% * 1% * 1% * 8% - 2% - 8% 12% - - - -

A GHI GI

Portugal 2 * 2 - 1 - 2 - 2 - 1 - - - - -* * * - * - 1% - * - 1% - - - - -

GI i

Romania 25 5 18 1 17 3 25 - 25 - 17 3 - - - -1% 1% 2% * 1% * 11% - 3% - 11% 11% - - - -

C E GHI GI

Russian Federation 6 - 5 1 1 5 - 6 6 - - - 1 5 - -* - * * * 1% - 1% 1% - - - 1% 1% - -

D fI I

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 187

Page 197: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 157/8

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsPLACE_OF_QUALIFICATION_CODE from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Saint Kitts And Nevis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Saint Lucia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Saudi Arabia 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

i

Senegal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Serbia 1 - 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - - - 1 - - -* - * - * - - * * - - - 2% - - -

M

Sierra Leone - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Singapore 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

Slovakia 3 - 3 - 2 1 3 - 3 - 2 1 - - - -* - * - * * 1% - * - 1% 4% - - - -

GhI I

Slovenia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Somalia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

South Africa 26 2 15 8 20 1 - 26 26 - - - 20 1 - -1% * 1% 2% 1% * - 5% 3% - - - 32% * - -

a Ab E FI FI M

Spain 17 3 13 1 12 - 17 - 17 - 12 - - - - -1% * 1% * 1% - 7% - 2% - 7% - - - - -

E GHI GI

Sri Lanka 8 - 4 4 - 8 - 8 8 - - - - 8 - -* - * 1% - 1% - 1% 1% - - - - 2% - -

Ab D fI I

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 188

Page 198: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 157/9

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsPLACE_OF_QUALIFICATION_CODE from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sudan 11 3 6 2 - 9 - 11 11 - - - - 9 - -* * * 1% - 1% - 2% 1% - - - - 2% - -

D FI FI

Sweden 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - -* - * - * - * - * - * - - - - -

I

Switzerland * - * - - * * - * - - * - - - -* - * - - * * - * - - 2% - - - -

i j

Syrian Arab Republic 14 2 10 2 5 6 - 14 14 - - - 5 6 - -1% * 1% * * 1% - 2% 2% - - - 8% 1% - -

FI FI M

Tanzania, United Republic Of - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Trinidad And Tobago 1 1 - - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* * - - - * - * * - - - - * - -

i

Tunisia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Turkey 2 1 1 1 1 1 - 2 2 - - - 1 1 - -* * * * * * - * * - - - 2% * - -

I i M

Uganda 1 - 1 * - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - * * - * - * * - - - - * - -

i

Ukraine 5 2 4 - - 5 - 5 5 - - - - 5 - -* * * - - 1% - 1% 1% - - - - 1% - -

D I I

United Arab Emirates 1 1 - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - - -* * - - - - - * * - - - - - - -

United Kingdom 1522 565 693 243 1090 279 - - - 1522 - - - - 1090 27966% 78% 58% 70% 83% 38% - - - 100% - - - - 100% 100%

BC B E FGH

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 189

Page 199: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 157/10

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsPLACE_OF_QUALIFICATION_CODE from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

United States 1 - 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - - - 1 - - -* - * - * - - * * - - - 1% - - -

M

Uzbekistan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Venezuela 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 - - - 1 - - -* * - - * - - * * - - - 1% - - -

M

Yemen - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Zambia 3 - 3 - 1 1 - 3 3 - - - 1 1 - -* - * - * * - * * - - - 2% * - -

I I M

Zimbabwe 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 1 - -* - * - - * - * * - - - - * - -

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 190

Page 200: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 158/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsTRAINING_STATUS_CODED from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 579 403 168 2 319 212 26 109 135 443 18 7 8 88 292 11725% 56% 14% 1% 24% 29% 11% 20% 17% 29% 11% 28% 14% 20% 27% 42%

BC C D F F FGH J N

No 57 40 17 - 30 19 1 11 12 45 - 1 - 10 30 92% 6% 1% - 2% 3% * 2% 2% 3% - 2% - 2% 3% 3%

BC C F f FH J

Not defined 1670 278 1015 346 965 509 204 433 637 1033 145 17 53 339 767 15372% 39% 85% 99% 73% 69% 88% 78% 81% 68% 89% 70% 86% 78% 70% 55%

A AB E GHI I I K m O

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 191

Page 201: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 159/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsTRAINING_LEVEL_CODED from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

CT1 52 44 8 - 34 16 2 6 9 44 1 2 2 5 31 102% 6% 1% - 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 6% 3% 1% 3% 4%

BC c fGH J

CT2 44 39 4 - 25 17 4 3 7 37 4 * - 2 22 152% 5% * - 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% - * 2% 5%

BC g GH N

CT3 12 2 10 - 2 8 1 8 8 3 1 - 1 5 1 31% * 1% - * 1% * 1% 1% * * - 1% 1% * 1%

c D I I N

F1 83 81 2 - 52 27 3 - 3 81 3 - - - 49 274% 11% * - 4% 4% 1% - * 5% 2% - - - 4% 10%

BC G FGH N

F2 68 66 2 - 40 24 3 5 9 60 1 1 - 5 38 173% 9% * - 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 4% 1% 4% - 1% 4% 6%

BC FGH n

ST1 47 35 11 1 24 15 2 10 13 34 - 2 - 8 24 52% 5% 1% * 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% - 10% - 2% 2% 2%

BC J

ST2 36 28 7 * 26 10 3 7 10 26 3 - 2 6 21 42% 4% 1% * 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% - 3% 1% 2% 1%

BC

ST3 75 55 19 - 40 25 2 17 19 55 1 1 1 12 37 123% 8% 2% - 3% 3% 1% 3% 2% 4% 1% 4% 2% 3% 3% 4%

BC C f F

ST4 32 13 18 - 14 15 2 9 10 21 1 - - 9 13 71% 2% 1% - 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% * - - 2% 1% 2%

C C d

ST5 45 18 26 - 23 17 2 9 10 34 2 - - 7 21 102% 3% 2% - 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% - - 2% 2% 4%

C C

ST6 47 14 31 1 21 24 2 19 21 26 2 - 2 17 17 72% 2% 3% * 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% 2% 1% - 4% 4% 2% 2%

C C D FI f

ST7 29 5 23 - 14 11 * 11 12 17 - * - 10 14 11% 1% 2% - 1% 2% * 2% 1% 1% - 2% - 2% 1% *

c aC F f j

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 192

Page 202: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 159/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsTRAINING_LEVEL_CODED from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

ST8 10 2 6 - 4 3 - 4 4 6 - - - 3 4 -* * 1% - * * - 1% 1% * - - - 1% * -

None 1727 318 1032 346 996 528 204 444 649 1079 145 17 53 349 798 16175% 44% 86% 99% 76% 71% 89% 80% 83% 71% 89% 72% 86% 80% 73% 58%

A AB E GHI I I K O

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 193

Page 203: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 160/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsRO_FLAG_CODED from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 7 - 4 4 5 2 - 2 2 5 - - - 2 5 -* - * 1% * * - * * * - - - 1% * -

Ab

No 2299 721 1197 345 1310 738 231 551 782 1517 163 24 61 435 1085 279100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

C c

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 194

Page 204: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 161/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsTraining_level_2016_coded from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

CT1 47 43 4 - 26 16 3 4 6 41 3 - - 2 23 142% 6% * - 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% - - * 2% 5%

BC GH N

CT2 54 46 8 - 35 17 3 5 8 46 2 1 2 4 31 132% 6% 1% - 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 3% 3% 1% 3% 5%

BC GH m

CT3 14 6 7 - 4 10 - 7 7 7 - - - 6 4 41% 1% 1% - * 1% - 1% 1% * - - - 1% * 1%

c D fi N

F1 39 39 - - 28 7 1 - 1 37 1 - - - 27 72% 5% - - 2% 1% 1% - * 2% 1% - - - 2% 2%

BC E G fGH

F2 91 88 2 - 58 26 3 1 4 87 3 - - 1 55 254% 12% * - 4% 4% 1% * * 6% 2% - - * 5% 9%

BC g FGH N

ST1 42 33 8 1 14 24 1 18 18 24 - - - 17 14 82% 5% 1% * 1% 3% * 3% 2% 2% - - - 4% 1% 3%

BC D FI F f l

ST2 37 29 9 - 21 13 2 8 11 27 - 2 - 6 21 52% 4% 1% - 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 10% - 1% 2% 2%

BC c J

ST3 69 54 13 * 42 23 5 13 18 51 5 * 2 10 36 123% 7% 1% * 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 4%

BC c

ST4 45 32 13 - 20 23 4 13 17 29 1 2 1 10 17 102% 4% 1% - 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 9% 2% 2% 2% 4%

BC C D J N

ST5 33 12 20 - 15 15 2 11 13 20 1 - - 11 15 51% 2% 2% - 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% * - - 2% 1% 2%

C C

ST6 35 14 21 - 14 14 2 11 13 22 2 - - 9 12 52% 2% 2% - 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% - - 2% 1% 2%

C C d

ST7 26 6 20 - 11 13 - 8 8 18 - - - 8 11 51% 1% 2% - 1% 2% - 2% 1% 1% - - - 2% 1% 2%

c C D F f f

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 195

Page 205: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 161/2

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsTraining_level_2016_coded from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

ST8 7 2 6 - 3 2 - 2 2 5 - - - 2 3 ** * * - * * - * * * - - - * * *

None 1767 319 1068 347 1023 536 206 452 658 1109 145 18 56 351 822 16677% 44% 89% 100% 78% 72% 89% 82% 84% 73% 89% 76% 92% 80% 75% 60%

A AB E GHI I I K M O

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 196

Page 206: GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS · GMC TRACKING 2016 - DOCTORS Methodology: ComRes interviewed 2,306 doctors online between 13th June and 13th July 2016. Data were weighted to reflect

Table 162/1

GMC 2016 Tracking Survey - DoctorsSAS_coded from sampleBase: All Doctors

PMQ REGION BY ETHNICITYAGE (S6) ETHNICITY PMQ REGION EEA IMG UK

Total 35 and under 36-55 56 White BME EEA IMGNet: Outside

UK UK White BME White BME White BMESignificance Level: 90% a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oSignificance Level: 95% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

Unweighted Total 2306 628 1223 422 1274 801 267 629 896 1410 189 33 70 501 1015 267

Weighted Total 2306 721 1200 348 1314 740 231 553 784 1522 163 24 61 437 1090 279100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Yes 262 103 131 25 88 148 34 158 192 69 24 6 12 132 52 1011% 14% 11% 7% 7% 20% 15% 29% 25% 5% 15% 26% 20% 30% 5% 4%

BC C D I FhI FI l

No 2044 618 1069 324 1226 592 196 395 592 1453 139 18 49 306 1038 26989% 86% 89% 93% 93% 80% 85% 71% 75% 95% 85% 74% 80% 70% 95% 96%

A AB E GH g FGH m

Columns Tested: A,B,C - D,E - F,G,H,I - J,K - L,M - N,O

Online fieldwork: 13th June - 13th July 2016 Prepared by ComRes Ltd

Page 197