Global Warming - Marshall Smith - Brojon.com

Special offer

Click on the Menu Bar to Select a Section of the Gazette

BroJon Home

The World

News of the USA

USA Politics

Business Industry

Weekly Magazine

Science Techno

Your Health

Comics Crafts

Puzzles Games

USA Humor

Feature Articles

BROTHER JONATHAN'S

FRONT PAGE NEWS BroJon Exclusive Report Before Uncle Sam There Was Brother Jonathan

GLOBAL WARMING: THE SCIENTIFIC HOAX EXPOSED

Prolog... Over the last two decades a great debate has occurred over whether Global Warming exists or not. The Pro-warming group did not have sufficient data to prove their point other than computer predictions and a "concensus of scientists." The Anti-warming group knew that the theory was not possible, but they also could not prove it. What they didn't know was that the rules for calculating atmospheric gases had been arbitrarily changed by a hoax. What follows exposes the hoax. In 1976, the U.S. government issued a standard reference manual called "The U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976." This large reference contains all the information about the atmosphere of earth, and has since then been used by all scientists such as environmentalists, space researchers, and geo-physicists. The previous edition, before the beginning of the space age, "The U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1965" was based on decades of data collected by thousands of researchers using balloons. That extensive balloon data showed that the components of the atmosphere were not equally distributed. Heavier gases such as, argon, carbon dioxide and freon, were mostly found down near the ground. While the much lighter components, such as hydrogen and helium floated up through the atmosphere to the top and disappeared into space. In the 1976 edition, all that pre-space age balloon data was completely discarded, even though the manual said that the older data was incorporated into the 1976 models. But that claim was false. In 1976 the older data was replaced with the false claim that in the troposphere all the gases are uniformly distributed. This false claim constitutes "scientific fraud." Based on this 1976 fraud, later theories in the 1980's were proposed that heavy gases such as carbon dioxide and freon, could climb very high in the atmosphere. That was the basis for the false claim that very heavy CFC's could "float" up to the stratosphere and destroy the Ozone Layer. Also based on the false 1976 data, it was claimed that heavy carbon dioxide could float high in the atmosphere and create a "green house gas layer" which would cause Global Warming. Both of these false scientific theories are based on the fraudulent data in the 1976 scientific reference manual. The perpetrators of that scientific hoax, so far have made over 60 billion dollars in fraudulent profits. With the implementation of the Kyoto Treaty, the perpetrators could earn as much as half a trillion dollars, taken out of your pocket, based on a hoax. To find out how such a massive world-wide scientific hoax could have been perpetrated in such a brazen manner, read the information below. The who, what, where, how, and why are all explained in detail.

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION: THE SWEEP OF HUMAN

HISTORY Where It All Began and Where American Science Failed

- The Coming Dark Age of Science 2012

Page 1 of 12GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

10.09.2007http://www.brojon.org/frontpage/global/globalwarming1.html

SCIENCE IN THE FIRST DARK AGE 2,500 BC Previously, in the March 9th Digest, I told the tale of the Egyptian

Temple, which from about 3,500 BC, was an advanced scientific instrument that produced scientific discoveries which we all still use today. There is much more to come in the form of documentary proof of that story. I also explained that from the historical period from about 2,500 BC to 500 BC was a mysterious early first ancient Dark Age with almost no new science discovery, and in fact, all the ancient science, based on talismans and totems, was swiftly being turned into miraculous myth stories which we now call pagan religions. Fortunately writing had been discovered so we have early written proof of this event.

The use of the mostly Egyptian, ancient science, which produced the ancient 365.245 day solar calendar for farming was being used by the new burgeoning form of government, kingdoms and monarchies, to secretly feed their local empires. The public wasn't told how the calendar worked. Otherwise, they would revolt and feed themselves.

Without the solar calendar, the early local governments only remained roaming tribal clans of sheep and camel herders constantly looking for food. These local or regional governments, under the control of chiefs or elders, could not supply enough food to form large dynastic kingdoms or empires. During the time of 2,500 to 500 BC, the local dynastic monarchy system spread throughout most of Europe and the middle east supported by the new discovery of solar calendar-based farming, under the control of kings and monarchs.

THE NEW SCIENCE AND GOVERNMENT 100 BC From 500 BC to about 100 BC at the height of the local monarchies, a new

birth of science, math and astronomical discoveries were made by such Greek scientists and mathematicians as Socrates, Aristotle, Ptolemy and Euclid. But it turns out that they were simply rediscovering the ancient science of Zoroaster and Imhotep, from thousands of years before.

They were re-discovering the new science simply by separating it from the ancient religious pagan myths of their own cultures. That original ancient science had been turned into myth stories by the local monarchy governments as a means to control the local populace by using science as a means of "mind control." This first cycle of creating new science, turning into mythological belief to create a new governmental system followed by a complete Dark Age, has been repeated several times in the history of mankind. We are now entering into a new third Dark Age, based on "mind control" to rule the people, which is based on perverting the science of the previous century.

In the period of 500 BC to 100 BC both the Greeks and the Romans developed a whole new form of government, called representative democracy with the government centralized in a Senate or forum elected by the people. This was a golden age of science and discovery. But by 100 AD the powerful dynasty of the Caesars had taken hold of the control of the Roman Empire and the Roman Senate became a mere sham of sycophants. By 300 AD free thought, science and discovery came to an abrupt halt. The new science now was to be used to create new "religious" myths which completely hid the recent scientific discoveries of the Greeks.

THE SECOND DARK AGE 300 AD From 300 AD to 1300 AD, a new second Dark Age occurred which was

devoid of free thought and scientific discovery, except in those regions not under control of the Roman or Holy Roman Empire - which was the remnant of the old Alexandrian Greek Empire, the government of the Greek Ptolemies in Egypt. But even in those regions, the scientific discoveries of the Ptolemies,



later called "Arabic" science, collapsed under the mental strictures of the religion of Islam in 675 AD. During the second Dark Age, all real science had disappeared and had been replaced by the new religious mythology based on the old science.

In the second Dark Age from 300 to 1300 AD, the advanced Greek math and science of Aristotelian logic and the "scientific method" was used by scholars such as Augustine to prove "scientifically" that "Jesus is Lord." And of course, mathematically how many angels can dance on pins, etc. To us, today that all sounds frivolous and silly, but it was the only "science" allowed by the government in Rome. It is what happens when government gains control of scientific thought. It is always done by using a consensus of the members of a council or a consensus of "scientists" who "vote" to decide what is "true scientific fact." Any free thinking or science outside that belief system was heretical and punishable by death or torture using the latest scientific instruments of Dark Age science.

This second Dark Age of the "government science" system began to collapse when it was clear that the only way to maintain a belief in the correct tenets of the second Dark Age "scientific religion" was to use the horrible methods of the Inquisition from 1200 to 1500 AD to terrorize the masses. This so disgusted many local leaders, and the populace throughout Europe that they completely turned away from the old "myth science" called Catholicism. They created new science and free thought such as Protestantism and Newtonian science. This started a new cycle of new scientific discoveries.

ENDING THE SECOND DARK AGE 1500 AD It was primarily Copernicus, Martin Luther and Galileo, who were

prominent leaders and believers in Catholisism, who led the march away from the old "science-religious" mythology into a new model of the world. That new scientific model was exquisitely described by Isaac Newton, who lived in England, which had not been under the control of the "Empire of Belief" in the Vatican since Henry VIII split with Rome in the early 1500's.

From 1500 to 1800 AD the new freedom of thought and science created the discoveries of the Industrial Age and what we now know as modern science. As in all previous times, during the very short periods of scientific freedom, a new form of government is also created. That new scientific invention of government after 1700 AD was called "a constitutional republic." It first appeared in the United States, but within less than a generation it had nearly swept all the way around the world.

That new system of government "looked" something like the old Greek and Roman Senate, but it was not. It was the old system of "democracy" completely turned upside down and inside out. It had never been seen before in all of human history.

THE COMING THIRD DARK AGE 1870 The symbol of that amazing new system of government was called

"Brother Jonathan" which is why you only hear about this story here in the BroJon Daily Digest. Only here is it easily predictable that the next coming Third Dark Age in science actually started in 1870. The world is already turning modern science into a new myth religion, using the words of closed-minded political correctness and the false scientific "global religious beliefs" that led to world government and conquest and the third scientific Dark Age.

In radio interviews and articles which I did nearly 20 years ago, based on calculations I had done in the 1960's, I predicted that the timing of the coming scientific Dark Age would be shortly after the year 2000. Does the year 2012 sound familiar? Many people have also found or "sensed" that same date to mark the end of something, but the end of what? Could it be the ending of the



current third golden age of science and the beginning of the next generation Dark Age.

In the mid-1700's that new scientific governmental system discovery only lasted about 100 years from 1760 to 1860, when it was completely corrupted and disappeared during the "upheaval in belief" called the American Civil War.

THE SOURCE OF THE NEW GOVERNMENT 1700 AD What was that absolutely novel discovery in a new form of government,

derived from the free-thinking science following the second Dark Ages of the Holy Roman Empire? That amazing discovery which completely swept around the world and was accepted by everyone? And why was it stomped on and obliterated by the events of the American Civil War and thus was completely eliminated from any future governments around the world?

What you are about to read, you have never read before. It is not taught in schools, nor in any history classes, especially in America. It is not to be found in any books. But it is an absolute fact of history.

For over a century now, most people are taught that some white-haired old guys, called the "Founding Fathers" created the Constitution of the United States out of their own heads. Wrong. They didn't invent it. Most people are taught that because some old guys made the Constitution over 200 years ago, it is now obsolete. Wrong. Most people believe that they have "Rights," because of the Constitution. Wrong. The Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, only guarantee that the new American Congress will make NO laws to "Take Away Any of Your Rights." Read the Bill of Rights again. It says "Congress shall make no law..." The Constitution says absolutely nothing about giving anybody any rights. In fact, quite the contrary, it now clearly takes away ALL of your rights as a citizen.

"BROTHER JONATHAN" DESTROYED 1868 AD Just after the American Civil War, the U.S. Congress did pass an

"unconstitutional" law in the form of the 14th Amendment, which in fact, did take away all of your rights. The 14th Amendment states "All persons born in the US and under the jurisdiction thereof ... will have certain privileges and immunities." Nowhere in the wording of that very lengthy amendment does it use the word "rights." At that point in time, the rights of ALL American citizens had just been taken away by that amendment. That is the exact date when Brother Jonathan died.

That is not taught in American history classes. In fact, most students now are lied to about the meaning of the words in that amendment, if it is even discussed at all. Even students and all American citizens in 1867 were also lied to. I have carefully read many dozens of books written in the 1860's all centered around the debate of passing the 14th Amendment, each with arguments pro and con. It was pointed out in all those old books that the American public was being "tricked" by giving up all their rights of citizenship, for the "greater good" of giving equal "privileges and immunities" to the poor enslaved blacks in the South. That's a nice "trick" if you can pull it off.

The public in 1868, who like you, probably never read the complete wording of the very long amendment, was told that the amendment was about giving "equal rights" of citizenship to the black slaves. But the word "rights" and especially not "equal rights" does not appear anywhere in that amendment. The Amendment was passed by the States, and the amazing scientific discovery on which the American Constitution had been created, suddenly ceased to exist. What was that amazing scientific discovery which had swept around the world, like a flame of freedom, in the preceding



century?

FINDING THE SOURCE OF "BROTHER JONATHAN" It was a scientific discovery based on the model of Newton's Law of

Gravity. Newton discovered that what made the moon go around the earth and the earth around the sun, was not some ancient myth of Zeus or Jupiter which propelled the planets in their orbits. No, it was a simple set of laws, called the law of gravity. Thus the new form of government would be something like a set of scientific laws which are independent of gods or men or even senates or forums elected by the people. But even more important, was the discovery made by a philosopher/scientist who was a contemporary of Isaac Newton. He was the far-forward-thinking Dutchman named Baruch Spinoza. And Spinoza's discovery was based on the concept of a new government using Newton's law-of-gravity model.

SPINOZA SPARKS A WORLD REVOLUTION 1776 AD By the mid-1700's Spinoza's book about his new discovery was the

popular rage all through Britain, the American Colonies, France and Germany and all around the world. Millions of people marveled at the discovery and most wished, "Wouldn't it be wonderful if we had a government like that!" But the concept was so completely revolutionary, that it would take a revolution to create it. It was the basis for the American Revolutionary War, the founding of America. and a decade later for the French Revolution.

Spinoza's book was openly read and discussed by those white-haired old men called America's Founding Fathers. It was the basis for many of their writings, which we can read today. They all agreed that if the American colonies ever did become separate from King George and the monarchy of Britain, the new American government would be based on Spinoza's astounding discovery. You surely did not read that anywhere before, nor was it taught in any of your classes in American History. Since 1870, you were not supposed to know that.

If you don't know or have not heard the name Baruch Spinoza, or know about what he had discovered, nor heard about Spinoza in your American History class, then you have not yet gotten to the kindergarten level of understanding the American Constitution nor the original intent of the Founding Fathers. You would have no understanding why at the end of the American Civil War, wealthy northern industrialists, who made millions of dollars during the War and had "bought" control of the Federal government, wanted to make sure that Spinoza's amazing discovery would be completely wiped from the face of the earth, forever.

SCIENCE OF SPINOZA CREATES A NEW GOVERNMENT 1786 AD

That revolutionary discovery by Spinoza, on the lips of every Founding Father at the first Constitutional Convention was simply, "It is the purpose of government to serve the people, and not the other way around." No government in the whole 10,000 year sweep of human history had ever been based on such a "revolutionary" concept. It was exactly the very basis of the U.S. Constitution, as shown by the very beginning statement, "We the people..." It was not a document created nor granted by any potentate, king nor deity.

But that revolutionary new government was completely taken away with the 14th Amendment at the end of the American Civil War. The concept of "We the People" with certain unalienable rights, simply disappeared. The concept of government serving the people just disappeared. Now, like all earlier governments in human history, the "people" will instead serve the government and in return the "people" will be granted "certain privileges and



immunities." You have the privilege of obtaining licenses to drive a car, marry or go

into business, or a zillion other activities which all require a license from the government. You have no "right" to do any of those things without license from the government. You have the duty and "privilege" of paying taxes and the "immunity" of not going to jail if you do pay your taxes. You have the "privilege" of giving all of your wealth and property to the government when you die, and not giving them as an inheritance to your children. If you actually thought you had Constitutional Rights....

To read a documentation of the slide of modern science into the abyss of the Third Dark Age from 1870 to the present, driven by wealthy industrialists who now control modern scientific beliefs, See: "Black Gold Hot Gold" on the BroJon Gazette front page.

THE FLOW AND CYCLES OF HISTORY In the March 15th BroJon Digest I explained how there have been three

cycles of history. Each cycle has four parts: (1) A golden age of new science discoveries, (2) the formation of a new governmental system based on the new scientific discoveries, (3) a process of "mind control" where the new discoveries and methods are turned into "religious" beliefs, and then (4) a very long Dark Age were the new government uses the new "religious" beliefs to control the minds and behavior of the world population. Most of all human history has been lengthy 1,000 year long dark ages with only about 200 years of free thought and new science occurring in between the dark periods of "mind control," oppression and despotism.

The latest cycle of the new freedom of thought and new scientific discoveries began in the mid-1700's. This was called the Age of Enlightenment, the rise of the Industrial Age and the beginning of modern science. It reached a peak, similar to the past two periods, about 200 years after it began. In this case at the end of World War II. Since about 1950, the United States, and most of the world has been sliding into a new abyss of the third 1,000 year Dark Age of the "new science." It is a new "scientific priesthood" which uses the new tools of science such as computers, satellites and secret laboratories to make you believe that only they can "save" the planet. They have become the new "saviors." But don't you believe it. They are only using scientific "trickery" as a new "religious belief system" to fool you.

WARNING OF THE COMING DARK AGE 1961 AD In January 1961, in his Farewell Address, the outgoing President

Eisenhower warned of two great dangers to America and to the world. You've heard of one, and heard it repeatedly, called the "Military Industrial Complex." What you probably never heard about was the other great danger, the "Educational Research Complex." If you do a web search on the BroJon Gazette and look for Eisenhower, you can find his Farewell Address and then read it for yourself, to find out that somebody has mislead you for the last 45 years about what he actually said and warned about.

It was the Educational Research Complex which would become the new "priesthood" that would use "computers" and "laboratories," as cited by President Eisenhower, as tools to control the "minds" of the populace to create a new world order and a new one world government system based on the "new science." Eisenhower could not have known nor predicted how quickly that new secret "priesthood" would grow and become so powerful.

DOCTRINE OF THE NEW PRIESTHOOD 1990 AD One of the "beliefs or tenets" of the new priesthood, is that there is a

"greenhouse gas layer" which is the cause of global warming. This "belief" is being used to terrorize the world into cutting back on carbon dioxide, the



main "greenhouse" gas, and that the world should follow the orders of the worldwide Kyoto Treaty. And the "priesthood" also wants you to allow the price of oil to rise exorbitantly in order to force people to cut back on using cars which produce carbon dioxide. The primary beneficiary or "profiteer" of this new false "belief" is Big Oil which is the main promoter and producer of this false "religious belief." They have enough money to buy their way into the corridors of Congress, into NASA and into the top secret national laboratories run by universities. They have produced the "new religion."

What I am going to show you right now are three very simple experiments that you can do yourself at home, or if you are a teacher you can demonstrate them to college students and even young children at school. They are extremely simple. They will absolutely "prove" that a carbon dioxide "greenhouse layer" does not exist and cannot and could never exist. I have already taught these simple experiments to my own students, and even to excited groups of young campers, Boy Scouts and Cub Scouts. Even very young children can do them and understand them.

FIRST ENCOUNTER WITH THE PRIESTHOOD 1989 AD I must add, please don't write to me and explain the latest data to be

found in global warming articles and textbooks. Do not waste your time nor mine. Twenty years ago, I talked to the manager of the environmental project at NASA Ames. I had worked at NASA Ames, as a top scientist/engineer on the Space Shuttle program over a period of two decades, so I know the people. The project manager, though she had a doctorate degree, it was in "environmental science" or something, so she knew almost nothing about basic physics and chemistry. Almost half of my phone call with her, was my explaining over the phone, how and why the earth is tilted and how it effects the weather. So she sent me off to talk to her boss at NASA headquarters.

I spent an hour talking to the big environmental boss at NASA headquarters. He did not like the fact that I had proved that the huge NASA program was basically a fraud. I never actually said that to him, but the data and evidence I presented sure proved it. He said, "Mr. Smith, you just don't have all the latest satellite data. I will put you on our mail list and send you all the latest data." Well, I now have over one complete shelf in my library consisting of the NASA data from the last 20 years, and updated with monthly bulletins with the latest satellite data. Thank you.

So, those who now want to write to me and feel that I should look at some new article or textbook with all the latest "greenhouse" findings, please don't. I already get the latest data directly from NASA even before it gets into the hands of the authors of those articles and textbooks. I have already read the data. You should also know that I have multiple university degrees in different areas of science, and am probably more educated and experienced than most of the professors and authors who write those "greenhouse" articles and textbooks. When somebody sends me emails telling me to read something, I usually toss it. It is the same as somebody preaching to me and sending me "proof" of the bible by sending me quotes like "Read John 3:16. It proves the bible is true." No thanks. I consider NASA data or university textbooks about "greenhouse" theories to be merely the new biblical scriptures from the "greenhouse priesthood." Don't send me any "greenhouse" religious tracts. I just ignore them. So let's cut to the chase.

EXPERIMENT ONE -- FUN WITH KITCHEN SCIENCE Run to your kitchen and pull out a tray of ice cubes from the fridge. Hold

the tray over the kitchen sink vertically and place your other hand about one inch away so your palm is facing the ice cubes. You can feel the cold ice cubes even though you are not touching them. Why? Are the ice cubes radiating cold? No. Nothing radiates cold. Only heat can radiate from a warm spot to a



colder spot. What is happening is that the warmth in your hand is radiating toward the much colder ice cubes. As the heat in your hand radiates much faster toward the cold ice cubes it lowers the temperature of your hand and you feel it as cold.

This is a simple experiment in heat radiation, which uses the most basic simple scientific instrument called - your hand. If you are a teacher, let the kids experiment with tilting the ice tray at different angles to eliminate the cold air coming from the cubes, wrapping it in plastic wrap, finding ways to measure the distance of hand to ice, etc. There are many variations which make very nice school science projects, with write ups on taking data, explaining radiation and even methods of taking measurements. But as you will see, it is one of the most powerful and important experiments you can do, since you are learning about using "you" as the scientific instrument.

EXPERIMENT TWO -- YOUR CONNECTION WITH THE UNIVERSE

On a warm summer evening, with no wind or clouds, and only a clear starry night sky, use your "now calibrated" scientific thermometer instrument, your hand, and aim the palm of your hand toward the ground. You don't feel any heat or cold. Now lift the palm of your hand so it faces the sky. Wow, it feels cold. That's because it is very cold way out there in outer space. You are using your own hand to take the temperature of the cosmos. That is your very own cosmic connection to the universe. Do this several times aiming your hand at the ground and then at outer space. Prove for yourself that it is cold out there, just as if you were inches away from an ice cube. You can "touch and feel" the cold of distant outer space just with the palm of your hand. I betcha didn't know that.

For the second part of this experiment, you need to wait for another evening when there is a high cloudy overcast so you can't see the stars. But not a stormy or windy night, just overcast. Then when you repeat the same experiment, as you aim the palm of your hand to the sky, you can't feel any cold. Why? What is happening is that the cloud is blocking all the heat coming from both the earth and your hand and the cloud is reflecting it back to you and the earth. It is also a true fact that it is always much colder on clear starry nights than on overcast nights. The cloud cover causes local warming like a blanket, so you feel warmer. Unless the globe of the world becomes completely surrounded by a thick cloud layer there is no global warming - only local warming where the clouds are.

PROVING YOUR CONNECTION TO OUTER SPACE When you did the first experiment with the ice cubes your hand had a

temperature of 98 degrees F but the ice cubes were at freezing or 32 degrees F. That is enough difference to feel the cold from a distance of about an inch. But on a cloudy night, both the earth and the bottom of the clouds are at a temperature of about 60 degrees. That is not enough difference to feel the cold. So pointing your hand toward the ground and at the clouds show they are about the same temperature. But on a clear starry night, the temperature of outer space is actually around minus 459 degrees while your hand is plus 98 degrees. That is a difference in temperature of about 560 degrees. That's why space feels so cold.

With the ice cubes, the temperature difference is about 70 degrees, but with outer space the temperature difference is about 560 degrees. In the science of thermodynamics it is shown that the amount of radiation is equal to the temperature difference raised to the fourth power. That means multiplying the number by itself four times. That humongous difference between your temperature and outer space is why the dark sky feels so cold even though it is so many light-years away.



EXPERIMENT THREE -- DISPROVING THE GREENHOUSE LAYER

The third part of this experiment is only a thought experiment, since it always fails - you can never make it work. If there ever were a layer of "greenhouse" gases which is reflecting heat from the earth and raising the temperature of the earth, then it should still be there as a gaseous layer at night. Why would it go away just when the sun goes down? It couldn't and it wouldn't. But if that "greenhouse" layer did exist, then when you do the experiment with your hand on a clear starry night, then you could not feel the cold of outer space since the "greenhouse" gases would reflect heat back to your hand, just like a cloud, and you couldn't feel the cold of space. It would be just like a cloudy night, but you would still see the stars. I have done this experiment with my hand and shown it to students for over 40 years. It always worked and still does even today. Thus proving that there is NO "greenhouse" gas layer which reflects heat back to earth and to your hand - and never has been and never will be.

HOW THE PRIESTHOOD FOOLED YOU How did the NASA "greenhouse priesthood" fool you with their data and

their false belief that there is a new "religion" called greenhouse global warming. It is simple. They used the tools described by President Eisenhower in his Farewell Address. They used satellites to look down at the earth and then used computers to make fictitious models which can produce any "tricky" result they wish. But their's is one complicated messy method. They use a thermometer in space on the satellite looking down at the earth, to measure hundreds of thousands of data points on the earth. Then they find the "average" temperature of earth. But that is always changing, night and day and even with the weather and the seasons.

Then the NASA "priests" find the average energy coming from the sun which warms the earth. But the energy from the sun is also always changing with the seasons, with the 11-year sunspot cycle, and daily with the numbers of sunspots, solar flares and coronal mass ejections, all of which constantly change the amount of energy coming from the sun. Then the "greenhouse priests" subtract one average number from the other average number and then claim "see our model shows the temperature of the earth is several degrees warmer than it should be, as predicted by the computer model, so there must be a greenhouse layer reflecting heat back to earth." Don't you believe it. This is simply "greenhouse" computer 'religious" scripture.

WHERE THE NEW "RELIGION" FAILED The fault or mistake with the "priesthood" method is to look DOWN from

space and measure the temperature of earth at jillions of data points over many years and then find a fictitious "average." Instead, they could simply take the same temperature sensor as on the satellite, and then from the ground take one "single" data point measurement looking UP into space. That is exactly what you did your temperature sensor - your hand, to prove that the "greenhouse" layer does not exist. Instead of using a satellite to look downward with millions of measurements, simply reverse the experiment and take one single measurement looking upward. How much more simple can you get? It requires no computer models, nor calculations. A single measurement on a clear starry night either proves or disproves the existence of a "greenhouse gas layer."

To get real scientific here, in the 1950's experimenters measured the actual exact temperature of outer space. They found that it is not actually absolute zero, but has a remnant background radiation temperature of about 3 degrees Kelvin. That's just 3 degrees above absolute zero and still real cold.



But that sensitive instrument only works on clear starry nights. On cloudy nights, the sky temperature is about 300 degrees Kelvin which would be the temperature of your hand or the temperature of the bottom of a cloud in the sky.

But no astronomer who measures the universal background radiation temperature has ever said, "We can't measure the temperature of space anymore because there is a huge reflective greenhouse layer which measures 300 degrees Kelvin. So we can't see the 3 degrees Kelvin background anymore." No astronomer has ever said that, thus proving absolutely, there is NO "greenhouse" gas layer. Absolutely none. Any, even slight greenhouse effect would raise the apparent background temperature of the night sky by hundreds of degrees. Alright, so lets cut to the chase again.

EXPERIMENT THREE -- WHAT GOES UP? This is a very simple and fun experiment which even kids can do and

shows much about scientific principles. You take two balloons and blow them up to the same size, about one foot or so, depending on the size of the balloon. The size is not important, just simply that they are the same size when blown up with air. One of the principles of chemistry and thermodynamics is that if I have two balloons of the exact same size, they will have exactly the same number of molecules of gas in each one.

Advanced students can find out what that number of molecules is called and even how to calculate that number. But let's just call it one jillion molecules. Since the air is made up mostly of di-atomic molecules of Nitrogen and Oxygen, there are two atoms inside each molecule of air. So each balloon has exactly TWO jillion atoms inside. If they both have the same number of molecules and atoms then they should weigh exactly the same. If you hold up both balloons and then let go, they will slowly drift down to the floor. You've probably seen this a lot at birthday parties and such. You know what it looks like.

WHAT DOES NOT GO UP Now take one of the balloons and instead of air, blow it up to the same size

with Carbon Dioxide gas. But the CO2 molecule is made of two atoms of Oxygen, just like the air, and then also has an extra Carbon atom inside each molecule. That's why it is called Carbon DiOxide - or one carbon atom and two oxygen atoms in each molecule of gas. So if I have the same size balloon filled with CO2, now instead of just two jillion atoms, this balloon contains THREE jillion atoms. That means the weight of the CO2 balloon is half again heavier than the balloon full of air. In science, that is called the specific gravity and for CO2, it is 1.5 times that of air, meaning it weighs half again more than 1.0 which is the specific gravity of air. This is like weighing two tennis balls, and then three tennis balls, and saying that three tennis balls weighs much more than just two tennis balls. Thus the CO2 balloon is much heavier than air. If you hold up the CO2 balloon and let go, it drops like a rock. Why? Because it is much heavier than air.

What this proves is that CO2 molecule which comes out of cars burning hydrocarbon fuels, does not make a gas which rises miles high up in the atmosphere and creates a thick layer of Carbon Dioxide which reflects heat and becomes a "greenhouse" layer gas. No No. If you have ever watched smog coming from cars, it hangs close to the ground, and then disappears over night. At most it will rise up several hundred feet into the air during the daytime and no higher. Why does it disappear? Because all the components of smog, such as: CO2, Ozone and smoky unburned hydrocarbons are all much heavier than air, and over night when it is cool and calm they all sink to the ground. They do not magically rise up high, all by themselves, into the sky to become a high altitude "greenhouse" layer.



Hot air balloons can rise up in the air, but heavier-than-air craft, such as airplanes do not rise up all by themselves to become a thick layer of heavy airplanes floating in the sky. It will never happen, could never happen and has never happened. It cannot happen with CO2 which is also much heavier than air. And as I just showed you, with these three simple experiments, which you can do yourself -- you can prove it for yourself.

THE PRIESTHOOD GOES "HIGH-TECH" When the "greenhouse priests" quote you chapter and verse from their

computer model "greenhouse" scriptures, just ignore it. It is no more valuable than preachers who quote to you biblical verses, such as John 3:16, to "prove" the biblical model of the universe. It only works, if you "believe it." But it provides no scientific evidence other than itself. It is not useful nor provable.

Of great shame, is the action of Science magazine several years ago, when they decided not to accept any more articles attempting to present arguments to disprove the greenhouse global warming theory. Science magazine once was the most respected world journal of modern technology, but no more. For years, there had been an ongoing debate about "greenhouse" gases. But Science magazine simply decided that there IS "greenhouse global warming" - and that's that, end of debate. It was a doctrinaire statement of belief, and not a scientific finding.

THE HERESY OF THE GREENHOUSE Well, I am fed up with such false "religious science" based on belief and

not real science, which has been produced by the "new priesthood of science" in the last 50 years. That is why I wrote the three experiments as I just did. I did it to prove with real scientific accuracy and proof, that the "global warming greenhouse priesthood" along with the "new priests" at Science magazine are Wrong. And provably wrong. They should be ashamed. Science magazine has taken a debate between "belief systems" and made an arbitrary decision. It is the same as Science magazine entering the debate about who is God - is it Jesus or Allah? And Science magazine arbitrarily and without any proof or evidence declared "Jesus is Lord" and Allah can go to hell. All very "scientific." I am fed up with such cheap fiction.

If you don't "believe" what I just proved about there being no greenhouse layer made of CO2, then I invite you to do the three simple experiments above, and then decide for yourself whether a greenhouse layer does or even could exist. You don't need to rely on the "greenhouse priests" with their complicated computer model scriptures to explain simple facts to you. You can do it yourself...

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? For proof and background reading, look for the article in the BroJon

Gazette which quotes and explains President Eisenhower's dire warning about the dangers of the "new science." Everybody has heard of the "Military Industrial Complex" but only the BroJon Gazette has the regular front page articles near the bottom, documenting the actions of the "Educational Research Complex" and the new Priesthood of Science.

Regular readers of the BroJon Digest are aware that I work on many projects at the same time. I have not before now, written about the problems with the "greenhouse gas" theory, though I have known it was incorrect for over a decade, since I have many projects which I have felt were more important. But it has now come time to bring the complete silliness called "greenhouse global warming" to an end.

All the journals and university textbooks about the "greenhouse" effect should be rounded up and sent back to the publisher to be remaindered as useless pulp fiction. Maybe they can be recycled into something useful, like



BROTHER JONATHAN'S - FRONT PAGE NEWS

+ - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - +

Direct corrections and technical inquires to webmaster at brojon.com. Please direct news submissions to newseditor at brojon.com.

All pages are Copyright 2006 the Teddy Speaks Foundation Inc., A Non-Profit Educational Corporation, Delaware USA "BROTHER JONATHAN GAZETTE" and "BROTHER JONATHAN WEEKLY MAGAZINE" are Trademarks of

the Teddy Speaks Foundation, Inc. and the Kinderken Press. + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - +

Gideon Bibles or something. But "religious tracts" about greenhouse global warming? No thanks. Never again.

A MESSAGE TO MY FRIENDS The foolishness and the useless greenhouse layer global warming debate

has come to an end. My friends at NASA will probably respond by sending me twice as many "religious tracts" about the Earth Observing System and several other satellite programs, but forgive them, for they know not what they do. I have already gotten the extra large size garbage can, so I am sure I can handle all of NASA's future "gifts." I give NASA an "E" for their decades long Effort to try to convince me that they are right. But I also give them an "F" for Failing to do so. I am not so easily fooled.

There are many thousands of scientists around the world who already know that I am correct. They already knew that there was something not quite right with the "global warming greenhouse gas theory." I've now just given them the simple scientific tools to disprove it beyond all doubt.

Marshall Smith Editor, Brother Jonathan Gazette [email protected] CLICK HERE TO SEE THE OTHER CHAPTERS

-- BROTHER JONATHAN GAZETTE

BroJon Exclusive Report

TELL A FRIEND ABOUT THIS ARTICLE If you wish, you can add additional addresses, comments

and messages after the email window opens. Enter the email address

Send this Article

Keep Up With the Latest BroJon Articles CLICK TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE FREE

BROJON DAILY DIGEST

Subscribe

To respond to this story click here to email BROJON GAZETTE. If you want to say something nice, we might read it. If you only want to bitch then we will toss it without reading. BJNews is not responsible for the world situation nor your response to it.


BroJon Home

The World

News of the USA

USA Politics

Business Industry

Weekly Magazine

Science Techno

Your Health

Comics Crafts

Puzzles Games

USA Humor

Feature Articles

Barnes & Noble University



392x72_1


BroJon Home

The World

News of the USA

USA Politics

Business Industry

Weekly Magazine

Science Techno

Your Health

Comics Crafts

Puzzles Games

USA Humor

Feature Articles

BROTHER JONATHAN'S



Chapter 2 SCIENCE AND THE PONTIFF

"The Belief in the Priesthood of the New Science" - What you weren't Told about Truth

"DON'T TELL ME THE TRUTH -- TELL ME THE FACTS" First a short note for Digest readers. The last edition of the Digest with the

three simple experiments which the readers can do to "prove" the "truth" about the claims of the "greenhouse priesthood" seems to have hit home. It's time for the BroJon readers to spread the "truth" through emails and chat rooms, so that the "truth" can spread around the world. Let me know what kind of response you get from the people to whom you tell about the three experiments.

A reader named Andrew just sent me a very important email: "I read with interest your explanation about the different topics that they

are based on theories and faulty scientific data. "Don't tell me the truth, show me the facts and I find my truth" or something like that. Very good." "There is one thing that you didn't consider. (Maybe you did). The movement of the sun and the earth is ALSO a theory, (according to Copernicus himself and it is STILL an assumption) yet you DO present it as a fact! Please correct me if I am wrong!"

CENTRAL BELIEFS OF MODERN SCIENCE -- Andrew, that is a most important question and gets right to the very

heart of the matter about where modern "Science" has gone wrong and stepped over the bounds, and how the "new priesthood of science" has now gone into the business of belief systems and "Religion."

Everyone today assumes that the earth goes around the sun. But is that a truth or a fact? It was the very center of the greatest debate between religion and science, that has raged for over 400 years. And it turns out the Religion method was Correct. And no I don't mean biblical religion. But the "religion" of the new mind-control "scientific priesthood." Let me explain.

In the early 1500's the Catholic priest Copernicus, who was also an educated mathematician and astronomer, had found a simple way to calculate the motions of the five observable planets by assuming that they all orbited around the sun. This also "implied" that the earth also went around the sun, but that was not the point of the Copernican system. Simply put, it was a math tool. It was a simple math "fact" which was very useful for doing calculation. Copernicus wisely said nothing about his discovery, and it was not published until after his death.



GALILEO AND THE CATHOLIC CHURCH Galileo Galilee, was also a devout Catholic and friend and confidant of the

Pope in the Vatican. Galileo glommed onto the newly published book by Copernicus, and added his own observations, through the first astronomical telescope, that some little lights, or moons appeared to be orbiting around Jupiter. Galileo then made the outrageous claim that the earth orbits around the sun, and not the other way around. At first the Church had no problem with Galileo's new book and his claims. But when Galileo actually started teaching his new theory to his university students, all hell broke loose.

The Pope roared, "Whoa Galileo, you've gone to far. OK. Everybody out of the pool. Galileo you have broken the law." (That's a rough translation of the Vatican text.) Then Galileo was arrested, tried and convicted for teaching false "truths." But what was Galileo's crime? Did the Church deny that it appeared that the earth goes around the sun? NO. That was not a problem. No churchman ever complained when Copernicus claimed a simple way to calculate the motion of the planets by using a mathematical model of the planets going around the sun.

THE CRIME OF GALILEO No, Galileo's crime was his claim that, if the earth goes around the sun,

then he was also making the claim that the earth "MOVES." Making that claim as a "Truth" was something which the Catholic Church could not tolerate. The reason was that maybe the earth did move, but it cannot be felt, touched, smelled, tasted or sensed in any way. Since it could not be "sensed" or physically proven it must be false. That was Galileo's crime.

To understand this crime, we need to look at how the ancient Greek "science" during the previous golden age from about 200BC had been turned into a new "priesthood religion" which lead to the second dark ages of mind-control which lasted from about 300AD to about 1600AD. During this dark age, the new "science-priests" had divided all of human knowledge into two parts. All of the old Greek and Roman science which was based on physical observations and could be confirmed by scientific experiment was called "scientific" and was allowed by the Church. And that included mathematical models such as the Copernican system of planets going around the sun.

But any knowledge or facts which could not be "sensed" or tested by physical experiment was determined to be "spiritual." And only the Church could make declarations about "spiritual truths." The Church priesthood of the second Dark Age claimed that right only for themselves.

ENTER THE PONTIFF The Church for 2,000 years has developed this system into a "spiritual

science" by a technique called "The Pontiff." You never knew that, and only assumed that "Pontiff" was merely another name or title for the Pope. Not so. It is the basis for the Church's "scientific-system" of mind-control for deriving spiritual "truths." The Pontiff is usually the Pope, but not necessarily so. They are two separate functions or stations, which traditionally have been assigned to the same person.

In the Catholic system of "spiritual truths" a "pontiff" is chosen by a committee to be the one who determines "truth." The term "pontiff" comes from the Latin word for "bridge." The Pontiff was elected to be the one human person who crosses the bridge from the physical world and travels into the spiritual world, then brings back the "spiritual truth" from somewhere on high. Only the Pope is empowered by the "pontiff" system to be able reach across the bridge into the spiritual world and then tell the truth as he saw it to this physical world by encyclicals and homilies. This system of non-physical "spiritual truth" has been successfully run by the Catholic Church for 2,000



years, but it sure ran into a problem with Galileo, about 400 years ago.

GALILEO AS THE NEW PONTIFF Galileo had made the claim that the earth "moves." But that fact could

not be sensed nor felt. So that fact must be, by church definition, a "spiritual fact." And then, only a factoid and not any truth. And yet Galileo was not only claiming it as a fact, he was teaching it in the university as a "spiritual Truth" which could not be physically sensed. But only the Pontiff can make statements about "spiritual Truth." Galileo had jumped completely over the College of Cardinals and had elected himself as a "new Pontiff" who could make statements about "spiritual truths" that cannot be sensed or felt.

To the Catholic church, this was the same as Galileo, as a "new self-styled Pontiff," proclaiming that, "God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten daughter, Luci..." This was so against the Church teachings, that the Church could not tolerate such inane behavior, especially from someone claiming only to be a scientist. What do scientists know about the spiritual world? No College of Cardinals had elected Galileo as a "new Pontiff" to make such non-physical claims which could not be sensed in the physical world.

THE NEW SCIENTIFIC PONTIFF I should note that this is the same "pontiff" system used today by the new

"greenhouse priesthood" who uses a "College of Cardinals" called a "consensus of scientists" to make claims about global warming and climate change, even though no "physical" or real scientific data "proves" their claim of Truth. In fact, in the last Digest, I provided three simple scientific "experiments" which anyone can "experience" to determine their own facts and then decide for themselves about what is Truth. The "greenhouse priesthood" is guilty of the same fallacy of logic and overstepping the bounds of reality, in the same way Galileo had done in making such outrageous claims about the Truth of the earth moving. There is no way of proving such a claim.

The problem for Galileo was that in the 1500's, there were no observations or scientific experiments which would show or even give an inkling that the earth moved. And it certainly couldn't be felt or experienced. Two hundred years later two scientific experiments were done to prove that the earth, in fact, did move.

EXPERIMENT ONE -- AS THE WORLD TURNS Run to your bathroom and flush the toilet. Notice that the water always

swirls in one direction as it goes down the drain. It goes one way in the northern hemisphere and the other way in the southern hemisphere. This "scientific" or physical observation is created by something called the Coriolis Force and is caused by the rotation of the earth. The proof is that the force is strongest nearer the poles of the earth, and is zero on the equator where the water does not swirl. Thus in the 1700's, Galileo could have done a proof that the earth moves, but it was 200 years too late for Galileo. Actually the much earlier "golden age" Greek scientists in 200BC, such as Aristotle and Ptolemy were on the very verge of making such breakthrough scientific observations about the earth moving, except for one thing - they didn't have any toilets.

EXPERIMENT TWO -- FOUCAULT'S PENDULUM Go to your local museum or planetarium, and find that huge metal ball

which hangs from the ceiling and seems to rotate around slowly like the hour hand on a big clock as it swings back and forth, and it knocks down little wooden pegs every 15 or 20 minutes or so. This is the Foucault Pendulum which was discovered in the late 1700's and provided clear proof that the earth rotates around itself about once a day, even though you cannot feel,



touch, smell, or "sense" the rotation. Just like the Coriolis Force, the Foucault Pendulum works best near the poles of the earth and does not rotate around at all near or on the equator. It's a very delightful and simple proof of the fact that the earth rotates and "moves," but again 200 years too late for Galileo.

But wait, that is only one part of Galileo's problem. Those two scientific experiments prove that the earth rotates around itself once a day. But can you actually prove that the earth also revolves in a yearly orbit around the sun at about 25,000 miles per hour - even though you can't sense, touch or feel it? Until about 1850 nobody had ever devised any such experiment to show that fact, so Galileo was really out of luck.

EXPERIMENT THREE -- PROVING GALILEO WAS WRONG?

About 1850, American and British physicists Michelson and Morley, devised an exquisite experiment to prove that Galileo was correct and that the earth actually did "move" despite the fact that you can't feel it. They took two beams of light and then sent one beam forward of the earth in its orbit around the sun, and the other beam was sent backwards. The difference in the speed of the two beams of light would finally prove that the earth was "moving" around the sun.

But hold on. The results of the Michelson-Morley experiment, no matter how many times it was repeated by hundreds of other scientists, always showed the beams of light were the same speed in both directions. Thus proving with scientific finality the "truth" that the earth does NOT move. What?? How could that be?

They had proved with the best science instruments of the time, that Galileo was WRONG and that the Catholic Church was correct in convicting Galileo for teaching false "truths." I am sure that you were never taught that in your school, and it was never explained to you why there was such a tumult and turmoil in physics and science from 1850, until 1905.

EINSTEIN ENTERS THE PONTIFF SCRUM It was into this decades long, scientific scrum, that the young German

physicist, Albert Einstein, made the outrageous claim that god plays mysterious tricks on our scientific instruments, and even though the earth "moves," god always makes the masses, lengths and speeds change, to make it appear that the earth does not move. But if the motion of the earth cannot be sensed, and even our best scientific instruments and experiments cannot show the motion, then Einstein's claim must be a "spiritual truth." That is the same "scientific" crime for which Galileo was convicted 300 years earlier.

Since, Einstein had entered into the arena of "truth" using "spiritual mathematics" to make the answer always come out to fit his "belief" that the earth "moved," -- I have always assumed for the last 50 years that Einstein himself was Wrong. That's why I wrote "Where Dr. Einstein Went Wrong," which can be found on the BroJon front page. Do I believe that the earth does not move? No, of course not. But I found another much simpler method to explain the zero result of the M-M experiment, other than Einstein's strange "magical spiritual" mathematics, which are not even mathematically nor arithmatically correct.

THE RULES OF THE TRUTH GAME If you want to play the "truth" game on the level of Galileo, Newton,

Einstein, the Church, or the next generation of scientists beyond Einstein, then you had better be very clear about the big difference between spiritual and physical, "truths" and "facts." Otherwise, you fall into the same trap as Galileo and Einstein and end up using the "Pontiff" mind-control system of



BROTHER JONATHAN'S - FRONT PAGE NEWS

truth, which is authenticated only by a vote from the consensus committee, and not by any scientific evidence.

The current "greenhouse priesthood" has shown that they don't have a clue. They are using the "Pontiff" system of a consensus of scientists, or a College of Climate Change Cardinals to proclaim their own brand of "truth." For shame. The "greenhouse priesthood" should start wearing their clerical collars in order to garner the "respect" they so dearly desire. Either that, or get out of the "truth" business entirely. They should turn in their fraudulent scientific degrees and doctorates, and go into something generally more useful for humanity such as real estate, truck driving or running massage parlors.

GALILEO, THE PONTIFF OF THE NEW SCIENCE And what about Galileo, is it possible to show that the argument between

Galileo and the Catholic Church was NOT about the sun being the center of the solar system, as we have all been falsely taught by the new priesthood of science, but instead was the argument about Galileo's claim of a "spiritual truth" that the earth moves? It was actually about Galileo's "Pontiff" claim that he could know "truth" about the earth without any physical evidence. The Vatican Library indicates this in the archived transcript of Galileo's trial 400 years ago. But not everybody has access to the documents of the Vatican Library.

But everybody can find a copy of Galileo's last dying statement, as he died while still under house arrest for his "crimes." Did he say "...See I was right. The sun is the center of the solar system?" No he didn't say that at all, because that was not his claim for which he was arrested and convicted. The last words of Galileo were "....and yet, it moves...."

Marshall Smith Editor, Brother Jonathan Gazette [email protected]

For more evidence and additional articles, see the items in "The Kinechron" on the Brother Jonathan Gazette front page. If you think what you've just read is valuable then share it with someone. CLICK HERE TO SEE THE OTHER CHAPTERS

-- BROTHER JONATHAN GAZETTE

BroJon Exclusive Report

TELL A FRIEND ABOUT THIS ARTICLE If you wish, you can add additional addresses, comments

and messages after the email window opens. Enter the email address

Send this Article

Keep Up With the Latest BroJon Articles CLICK TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE FREE

BROJON DAILY DIGEST

Subscribe

To respond to this story click here to email BROJON GAZETTE. If you want to say something nice, we might read it. If you only want to bitch then we will toss it without reading. BJNews is not responsible for the world situation nor your response to it.


BroJon Home

The World

News of the USA

USA Politics

Business Industry

Weekly Magazine

Science Techno

Your Health

Comics Crafts

Puzzles Games

USA Humor

Feature Articles

392x72_1




BroJon Home

The World

News of the USA

USA Politics

Business Industry

Weekly Magazine

Science Techno

Your Health

Comics Crafts

Puzzles Games

USA Humor

Feature Articles

BROTHER JONATHAN'S



Chapter 3 THE GLOBAL WARMING PONTIFFS

"Belief in the College of Green House Cardinals" - The Coming Dark Age of Science 2012

THE SCIENTIFIC CYCLES OF HUMAN HISTORY In seeking the facts behind the "global warming priesthood" we

previously looked at two new concepts. First, every 2,000 years for the last 6,000 years, there have been short periods of human scientific breakthroughs for about 200 years, which quickly are turned into a form of scientific religion which then becomes a new form of government. This is followed by a 2,000 year Dark Age with no new human science, as the new government/religion/science is used to control the minds of mankind and turn them into mental slaves. We also looked at how this was done using the concept of "the Pontiff."

According to this repeating pattern of human history the last golden age of scientific discovery started around 1750 and ended about 1950. Since about 1960, it is clear that modern science has made a clear break with the past and is quickly being combined into a new religious belief system. One clear sign of this is that in modern science classes, the normal role of doing "experiments" is being quickly replaced by using computers to run "virtual" experiments on "computer models" but NOT on reality.

THE FAILURE OF SCIENCE EDUCATION To teach young science students that running experiments in "virtual"

reality on computers is just as good as real "experiments" is the ultimate form of mind-control and brainwashing. It is the same as the teacher arbitrarily determining the size of the head of a pin, and then allowing the student to calculate how many angels can dance on the pin. And then using that result to "prove" that angels, in fact, do exist and dance on pins - that is mind-control using a false belief system.

I just completed an online survey of the college syllabus for about 25 courses in "global warming" from as many different universities. Each and every course used the same method of allowing the student to enter data into a computer model, and then calculate the "greenhouse effect" and the resulting amount of "global warming." None of the courses allowed the students to do the simple "hands on" experiments which you have seen here, and will see below, which in fact, show that man-made global warming does not even exist.

SCIENCE BY HUMAN EXPERIENCE It was the father of modern science, Galileo, who taught that the students



should run their own experiments to "prove" the facts for themselves, and not just rely on the beliefs of dogmatic teachers. All around Galileo, teachers used mathematic precision to prove how many angels could dance on a pinhead. But Galileo taught his students to actually drop a light and heavy object off a tower and then to "prove" for themselves which one falls faster, or doesn't.

Galileo also taught his students to use their own bodies as instruments, as when he used his own heart pulse rate to measure the speed of a pendulum and "prove" that the time of the swing was only a property of the pendulum's length, and not the speed or distance of its swing, as was claimed by the "pontificators."

USING THE EXPERIENCE OF EXPERIMENTS With that in mind, previously, we did several experiments which proved

that it is impossible to have a "greenhouse layer" which heats the earth and causes "global warming." The simple experiment was to fill two balloons to equal size, one with air and the other with CO2. The CO2 balloon is 50 percent heavier than air so it "drops like a rock" showing that CO2 cannot go "up" into the atmosphere to become a "greenhouse layer." Many BroJon readers wrote to say that they did the experiment and are convinced that there cannot be a "greenhouse layer." But still, what about all those measurements showing that there is "global warming?"

Is it true that the polar ice caps are melting, the northern polar ice pack has not reformed in the last two years, there are glaciers melting all around the world, and that Greenland ice pack glaciers are disappearing? Isn't that global warming? Is it possible to prove with some simple experiments which you can do yourself, that all of those are actually false observations. Yes. So lets get started.

FINDING TRUTHS BY EXPERIENCE AND EXPERIMENT First we need to measure the temperature of the earth. But how do you do

that? NASA and the "global warming greenhouse priesthood" has claimed a method using several earth observing satellites. With jillions of measurements averaged over decades and the data plugged into complex computer models, they have measured the temperature of earth and they find it is slowing rising. Is that true? Or is there another simpler way to measure the temperature of earth?

Well, how do you measure the temperature of a squirming newborn baby? You take your thermometer and apply it to the infant. But where? We could take hundreds of temperatures all over the baby and then calculate the average, but that usually doesn't, and in fact, never works. Oral temperatures usually don't work with crying screaming babies, so the usual method is to use a rectal thermometer, and "tada" the rectal temperature of baby is quickly found to be 98.6 F or 37 C. Can we do that same thing with "baby" earth? You betcha. It's easy.

EXPERIMENT ONE -- TAKING TEMPERATURE OF EARTH Run to your kitchen and get an old spoon, or maybe run to the garage and

get a trowel and dig a small hole in your backyard about a foot deep. Deeper is better. Don't use your mom's best silverware for this experiment. Then stick your thermometer into the "rectum" you just made and take the "rectal" temperature of earth. Depending on how far away you live from the equator of the earth the temperature will be just about 40F.

If you repeat this experiment during the day and then later at night, and even during the hot summer or snowing winter, the temperature at your location will "always" be the same 40 F. That's because that "IS" the temperature of the earth. It has been that same temperature of earth for the



last hundreds of thousands of years. It's that simple. It doesn't take billion dollar satellites to measure the temperature of the earth. It's right under your feet, about a foot down below the surface. And you can do it yourself.

DIGGING FOR THE TRUTH Throughout the last 5,000 years of recorded history, since the

development of writing, it's been shown by archaeologists, that mankind has dug holes in the earth to make root cellars to store food during freezing cold winters and torrid hot summers. The modern refrigerator has a section at the bottom for storing produce which has a temperature of about 40F, so it works the same way as the 5,000 year old root cellar.

If there were ever to be "global warming" then the millions of root cellars around the world wouldn't work anymore. There is no indication that there is any global warming of the earth. And you just proved it by taking a single temperature measurement of "baby" earth. And you can do that experiment as many times as you like and always come up with the exact same result. That's called science. Anybody can do it with their own bare hands and prove it for themselves.

HOW THE PRIESTHOOD FOOLS YOU In a previous set of experiments about the "greenhouse layer" we looked

at how NASA uses a method of looking at "jillions" of temperature measurements, then measuring the total heat from the sun and then they find that the earth is a few degrees warmer than it should be and then they claim that the extra heating is due to "greenhouse warming."

But earlier, I showed you a simpler method by taking a single temperature measurement from the ground looking upward at the night time sky, and measure the temperature of outer space. You can even do it using just your bare hand as the thermometer. If there is a "greenhouse layer" then the temperature of the night sky would be much warmer, as it is on a cloudy night. But if the temperature of the night sky on a clear night is zero, then that is proof that there could be no "greenhouse layer."

Astronomers have already done this, and there is no "CO2 greenhouse layer" and it is done with just a single temperature measurement, not with the jillions of measurements as in the NASA "priesthood" method which is designed to fool you with false computer models.

With the same "hands on" simplicity, you have also just learned how to take the temperature of earth with just a single measurement using the "rectal" method. It has worked for making "root cellars" for the last 5,000 years of human history. It still works.

BEWARE THE EDUCATIONAL-RESEARCH COMPLEX! The "global warming greenhouse priesthood" has also made a major

mistake in their "virtual reality" computer models. There are TWO major sources of heat which cause the temperature of earth, and NOT just one called the sun. Thus measuring the total energy from the sun reaching earth, then measuring the temperature of the earth will always give the result that the earth is too hot.

The "global warming priesthood" then claims the extra heat must be due to "greenhouse warming." The "priesthood" also claims that to prevent "global warming" you need to "Repent" and "believe" that you should "change your behavior" and stop driving cars or buying and burning fossil fuels to stop the "runaway greenhouse." With "Protocols" such as Montreal, Rio and Kyoto, you have been told that the price of oil and gasoline must be allowed to rise multiple times to bring in increased billions of dollars of profit each year to the oil companies - in order to prevent the "runaway



greenhouse." But that is false, since the other massive major source of heat, beside the sun, is the earth itself.

FINDING TRUTH IN THE SKIES About 50 years ago, astronomers measured the surface temperatures of

the large planets Jupiter and Saturn. They also calculated how much heat from the sun reached those planets. They were amazed to find that both planets were much hotter than they should be. They were both radiating much more energy than they received from the sun. How could that be?

It turns out that the centers of all the planets are not cold but, in fact, are very very hot. In fact, they are white hot, or about 20,000 to 40,000 degrees hot. But they are all covered by a rocky layer of material which insulates the interior, so the outside of Jupiter and Saturn appear to be almost frozen, but still all that tremendous interior heat leaks outward to make them radiate more heat than they ever get from the sun.

In the case of Saturn, based on the heat from the sun, and the tremendous distance from the sun, the surface of Saturn still is about 100 degrees hotter than it should be. Saturn radiates about 30 percent more energy than it receives. In the case of Jupiter, since it is closer to the sun, it gets more heat from the sun than does Saturn, but it still radiates about the same amount of heat from the interior as does Saturn. Because Jupiter is closer to the sun, that interior heat radiating outward is only about 10 percent more energy than it receives from the sun. The astronomers figured that out about 30 years ago.

THE "PRIESTHOOD" IGNORES THE FACTS AND TRUTH But what about in the case of the earth? It is much closer to the sun, so the

amount of extra heat coming from the core of the earth, compared to the total heat coming from the sun is only about 2 percent more than should be expected. But is that 2 percent extra heat due to "greenhouse warming" or is it simply radiating from the center of the earth itself?

The "global warming priesthood" has chosen to simply ignore the data from the astronomers. The "priesthood" made up their own theory of "the runaway greenhouse." So how much total heat comes from the earth, and how hot is the center of the earth where all that heat comes from?

EXPERIMENT TWO -- DIGGING BEYOND THE FACTS Run out to your backyard where you just took the temperature of the

earth down about one foot or so. Now continue digging down about 10 miles. This will have to be a thought experiment, since nobody can actually do that. If you dig down into a coal or diamond mine about 1 mile, the temperature goes up about 100F degrees. If you dig down 2 miles, the temperature is already about 200F degrees. It takes special air conditioners and water cooling of the rocks to dig mines that deep. Keep digging down to 10 miles and the temperature is a whopping 1,000F degrees.

That high heat is the same temperature of the electric heating element on your stove turned up full, or the temperature of the heating element in your toaster. It is a bright yellow heat. At that temperature the metal in your old digging spoon or garden trowel starts to melt. Of course, you would have "melted" and ceased to exist long before you got to 10 miles, so this obviously is only a thought experiment.

Sometimes, the hot molten rocky material from 10 miles deep comes gushing up as melted metals in the form of glowing red or yellow lava spewing from volcanoes. That shows how hot the earth is just a few miles down. The deepest drill holes so far, are only about 6 miles, and maybe with new hi-tech drilling equipment it might be possible to drill to 10 miles, but that is far in the future. So what is the temperature of the center of the earth down a distance



of 4,000 miles?

WHAT THE "PRIESTHOOD" IGNORES ABOUT EARTH The thermodynamic equations to find the temperature of the center of a

sphere, like the earth, are rather complicated. So I will smooth out the math for you. Near the surface where we live, the temperature goes up about 100 degrees for every mile you dig. The actual measured number is more like 88 degrees per mile, but 100 degrees is a nice round number.

But nearer the center of the earth, the increase is only about 2 degrees per mile, and at the exact center the increase is zero. So I have found for you, the increase in temperature per mile from the surface of the earth to the center has an average of about 5 degrees per mile. Now you can easily find the temperature of the center of the earth, by multiplying the distance of 4,000 miles times the average increase of 5 degrees per mile, and it comes out to be 20,000F degrees. But by golly, that just happens to be the temperature of the interior of the sun. It is even hotter than the solar surface which we can see with our eyes. What a strange coincidence. And to where does all that heat go? Does it just stay in the earth and not leak out?

And if you do the same calculations for the planets Jupiter and Saturn, you find they also both have a center temperature of about 20,000F degrees, the same as the interior of the sun. Just another very strange coincidence? Is it the same for all the planets? Or is there something else going on here which the "global warming priesthood" has not figured out and told you about? Of course there is, but I will explain it later with some easy experiments you can do to show what is happening.

LEARNING FROM YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE In the meantime, notice that you have just learned how to properly take

the temperature of the earth, not with jillions of measurements, nor with billions of dollars of satellite hardware and computers, but with a single measurement which you can easily do in your own backyard.

The simple experiment comes up with the exact same average number which all the satellite data shows as the average of the earth temperatures over day and night and through the seasons and years. The average temperature of the earth's surface is about 40F degrees, and it hasn't changed for thousands of years.

You have also learned that each of the planets also radiate extra heat from their planetary cores which all have the same high temperatures and it's not from any "greenhouse" effect.

But what about the melting icecaps, the disappearing glaciers, the thinning ice sheet on Greenland, and what causes the Ice Ages to come and go? Would I let you down? That's coming soon, with simple experiments you can do yourself to prove that the "global warming greenhouse priesthood" is still counting angels on the head of a pin. And then making you "believe" that their mind-control "pontifications" are true...

Marshall Smith Editor, Brother Jonathan Gazette [email protected]

NOTE: Why is it that to understand "global warming" you also need to know the history of the Catholic Church? That will also be explained. The two concepts are inseparable. Why isn't that also true of Judaism, Hinduism or Islam? It's simple - they don't have "pontiffs."




BroJon Home

The World

News of the USA

USA Politics

Business Industry

Weekly Magazine

Science Techno

Your Health

Comics Crafts

Puzzles Games

USA Humor

Feature Articles

BROTHER JONATHAN'S



Chapter 4 THE REVELATION OF GLOBAL WARMING

The Catholics, the Gnostics and Global Warming - The Coming Dark Age of Science 2012

THE NEW RELIGION OF CLIMATE CHANGE In recent Digest Articles we looked at simple science experiments you can

do to prove that there is NO greenhouse layer, and thus there is no man-made global warming. We looked at how the concept of "global warming" is based on a new "religion" with the so-called "proof" being based not on scientific evidence, but on a "consensus" of the College of "green house" Cardinals.

We looked at how human history shows a repeating cycle of about 2,000 years of Dark Ages with a small interlude of 200 years of scientific discoveries and technological break-throughs. Then the new science is quickly turned into a new form of world government-religion. The new Dark Age and a new "one world government" is about to begin with the "belief" in the Global Warming religion as the harbinger.

THE NEW GNOSTICS OF THE 21ST CENTURY Recently there has been much news hype about a newly discovered

ancient gnostic scroll called the Gospel of Judas. This gives us another look into the Global Warming religion. Anyone wanting information about the Gnostic religion would probably start with the excellent books by Dr. Elaine Pagels. But in those books you would be hard put to find any difference between the Gnostic religion and the Catholic religion. And there is a reason.

There is NO difference between the "religion" of the Catholics and the Gnostics. There might be some minor "sectarian" belief differences, but they are both substantially "Christian" religions.

The big difference is that the beliefs of the Gnostics were a "religion" but "Catholicism" is a GOVERNMENT. Catholicism became the first state religion which is banned by the US Constitution, and is the model and basis for all fundamentalist Muslim governments.

CATHOLICS VERSUS THE GNOSTICS The term "Catholic" is not a religious term. It is from the Latin "cata-

holic" which means "categorically whole" or complete. It could be called the First Century version of "The New World Order." It was the Christian religion which was combined with the Roman Empire, but with the new head of government being the Pope, rather than the Roman emperor. (I should note that I am referring here only to the early or historical Catholic church and NOT the current Catholic church.)



The Gnostics, mostly in Egypt, from about 200 AD refused to be subservient to the newly forming central government church in Rome. Despite all the "horror" stories about feeding Christians to the lions, the Roman "church and state" actually started coming together about 100 AD. It is clear from the apostle Paul's writings, that it started during the lifetime of Paul, in the first century. For that reason, the early Gnostics were branded as "heretics," simply because they refused to be subservient to the church in Rome.

THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF THE GNOSTICS The Gnostics were mostly all the many Christian churches in Egypt.

There were hundreds of them around 200 AD, all up and down the Nile River. That is where the 50 or so Nag Hammadi Library texts and even the Gospel of Judas were found, in Egypt. The Gnostic gospels were all secretly hidden away, and only found thousands of years later, since the Catholics in Rome had already decided to seek out and burn them all. We only now, are finding the long lost remnants. And now you know why they were so carefully hidden away, and why they were so very hard to find.

Most of the gnostic texts were written in Coptic, which is the Egyptian language using Greek alphabet letters. The texts almost all describe an ongoing "spiritual war" between the "good church" and the "bad church."

Most Gnostic scholars have all made the same mistake of thinking that the two churches were two sects among the Hebrew religion. But not so. The "bad church," as described in the Gnostic texts, was the nascent Catholic church in Rome which about the time of the writing of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag Hammadi Library, had already begun the mass-murders of all heretics and the burning of all their writings.

WHAT'S HIDDEN IN THE VATICAN ARCHIVES? I had discovered that fact back in 1975, but so far I have not read any

scholar, including Dr Elaine Pagels, who has figured out that the two churches were "Christian" and not "Hebrew." But that is because the early Catholic church had completely "erased" all history of the events between 100 AD and 350 AD, except in the "approved" biblical texts, so no Gnostic scholars ever made the connection that the "bad church" was the Catholics.

The Vatican Library in Rome has 25 miles of shelves of historical books and documents hidden in deep crypts, going back to the founding of the church. Like all criminal governments, such as Hitler's Nazis and Saddam's Tikriti Sunnis, they all kept good records of all the names of peoples and groups annihilated. But so far, nobody has been able to get access to any of the very early Vatican documents. Maybe some day.

BISHOP IRENAEUS DECLARES "JUDAS" A HERESY 180 AD The Gospel of Judas is actually not new. It was discovered about 30 years

ago, about the same time as the Dead Sea Scrolls, along with the Nag Hammadi Library, but the "owner" wanted to sell it to the highest bidder but nobody bought it at her price. But finally the seller found a good price, since it now has the value of being made into a movie, meaning potential big bucks.

But the text of the Judas scrolls had been translated and known for decades. So, one wonders why all the current hoopla in the newsmedia about "the Judas Text" -- unless it's pushing for a new movie. As a follow on to the movie blockbusters, Mel Gibson's "Passion" and the new Dan Brown movie "Da Vinci Code" -- the revelations in the Judas Text would fit right in as a successful sequel -- "The Passion of Judas in the Da Vinci Code Part II."

THROWING CHRISTIAN HERETICS TO THE LIONS Many people blame the "horrendous" reign of Constantine for the source



of massacres. But it wasn't just the corrupt emperors. They were all corrupt and murderous which is why Rome failed and was taken over by a religion. It was actually the Church itself, with its new "power of the state" which now had the ability and manpower to produce a

Documents

Global Warming - Marshall Smith - Brojon.com