Upload
barbara-adams
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Our Goal Use the ICRG Risk Ratings to: –Forecast returns on MSCI index for 18 countries using the changes ICRG ratings –Forecast the 1-year ahead volatility (variance) on the monthly returns on the MSCI index Test the performance of portfolios of countries based on the direction of the change in the composite rating
Citation preview
Global Tactical Asset AllocationAssignment 1
Country Risk Indices and Portfolio Management
CRIIPErnesto Cadeiras
Matias CorreaSugio Suzuki
Sandeep Toshniwal
International Country Risk Guide
• Three different risks: financial, political and economical
• Based on a compilation of 24 risk factors; 5 financial, 13 political and 6 economical
• Issued monthly• A composite risk index is also calculated as
a weighted average of all the factors
Our Goal
• Use the ICRG Risk Ratings to:– Forecast returns on MSCI index for 18
countries using the changes ICRG ratings– Forecast the 1-year ahead volatility (variance)
on the monthly returns on the MSCI index• Test the performance of portfolios of
countries based on the direction of the change in the composite rating
Forecasting Returns
• Early in our analysis we found out that:– The models had very bad performance in-
sample– Specifically the economical risk rating was
insignificant• Based on these findings we tested 4 models
to forecast returns
The Models
Independent Variables:• Model 1: Change in the political and
financial rating• Model 2: Change in all 3 ratings• Model 3: Value of the 3 ratings• Model 4: Value of the political and
financial ratings
The Results
Model In-Sample Out-of-Sample
1 Poor Best
2 Poor 2nd Best
3 Best Poor
4 2nd Best Poor
Forecasting Volatility
• We tested two models to forecast volatility– Model 1: Values of the three ratings– Model 2: Changes in the three ratings
• Model 1 had an impressive performance (in-sample)
• When we tested out-of-sample, model 2 was actually better than model 1
Portfolio Comparisons
MSCI World
Portfolio 0
Portfolio +1
Portfolio -1
$100
$300
$500
$700
$900
$1,100
$1,300
0.15% 0.20% 0.25% 0.30% 0.35% 0.40%
Variance
Ret
urns
(bas
e $1
00 -
Jan.
'84)
Conclusions
• Our results show worse performance than the models we tested in assignment 3
• Some (not few) of the coefficients were positive
• There seems to be some forecasting power in the changes in the ratings– Variable is too discrete
Netherlands, Model 1
Plot of YrRet
predicted
obse
rved
-0.18 0.02 0.22 0.42 0.62 0.82-0.18
0.02
0.22
0.42
0.62
0.82