Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 1st · PDF fileimplementation guideline is intended to provide supply c hain stakeholders, including ... Carrefour 0. 1 37. 0 38. GS1 Australia

Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 1st Quarter 2017 report

April 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 1 of 16


An update on the previous quarters, key facts and figures

Release 1.0, January – March 2017 (Q1)



Table of Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 3

2 Standards and guidelines are created through the GSMP 4-Step Process ..... 3

3 Standards Activity ...................................................................................... 3 3.1 Standards delivered in this quarter ................................................................................. 3 3.2 Development work in process ........................................................................................ 4 3.3 Work request activity ................................................................................................... 4

3.3.1 Top work request submitters ................................................................................. 6 3.3.2 Work request aging report .................................................................................... 6

3.4 Standards Development Work Group .............................................................................. 6 3.4.1 Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs) ................................................................... 7 3.4.2 Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG) .................................................................... 7

3.5 Performance ............................................................................................................... 7 3.5.1 Standards maintenance work ................................................................................ 7 3.5.2 Development work .............................................................................................. 9

4 Participation ............................................................................................ 10 4.1 GSMP membership .................................................................................................... 10 4.2 Voting ..................................................................................................................... 11 4.3 Event attendance ...................................................................................................... 11

5 Quality .................................................................................................... 12 5.1 Due process ............................................................................................................. 12 5.2 Consensus ............................................................................................................... 12 5.3 Satisfaction survey results .......................................................................................... 13

5.3.1 GSMP member satisfaction survey ........................................................................ 13 5.3.2 GS1 Industry and Standards Event March 2017 satisfaction survey ............................ 14 5.3.3 GS1 Member Organisation satisfaction survey ........................................................ 14

6 GSMP Governance Groups ........................................................................ 14 6.1 Board Committee for Standards (BCS) members ............................................................ 14 6.2 Industry Engagement Steering Committee (IESC) members ............................................. 15 6.3 Architecture Group (AG) members ............................................................................... 15

More information ............................................................................................ 16



1 Introduction The Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) is a community-based process for creating deliverables that serve the GS1® community.

The deliverables from GSMP are:

• GS1 standards: documents that trading partners agree to follow in order to achieve interoperability goals. The rules that must be followed are called normative statements.

• GS1 guidelines: non-normative documents that assist individual organisations in understanding and applying GS1 standards.

• Collateral materials: other documents that provide an understanding of GS1 standards and GS1 guidelines and how to use them.

This report contains the standards and guideline development activity for the 1st quarter of 2017 (January-March).

2 Standards and guidelines are created through the GSMP 4-Step Process Figure 2-1 GSMP process

3 Standards Activity 3.1 Standards delivered in this quarter

The EPCIS and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) Implementation Guideline has been updated to incorporate the revised EPCIS and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) Standard, V1.2. The implementation guideline is intended to provide supply chain stakeholders, including manufacturers, distributors, retailers, logistics providers, solution providers, business process architects; IT departments (developers) and solution providers with an introduction to implementing a visibility system using EPCIS, the Core Business Vocabulary specifically and GS1 standards.

GS1 General Specifications Standard v17 has been to include 24 work requests (e.g. MRO in Rail, align on human readable interpretation, New Ai for paperless coupon, etc…). The GS1 General Specifications Standard is the core standards document of the GS1 System describing how GS1 bar codes and identification keys should be used.

A new GS1 XML Maintenance Release 3.3 Standard, includes all technical solutions for all EDI business requirements approved during last two years (2015/2016).

A new version of the EPC Tag Data Standard (TDS), 1.10. GS1's EPC Tag Data Standard (TDS) defines the Electronic Product Code (EPC), including its representation at various levels of the GS1 Architecture and GS1 System Landscape (e.g., on EPC/RFID tags and in EPCIS events), and specifies the data carried on more Gen2 RFID tags. TDS 1.10 includes a number of backward-compatible



enhancements, such as data carrier-neutral EPC URIs for the Global Identification Number for Consignment (GINC), the Global Shipment Identification Number (GSIN) and the BIC container code, as well as additional EPC/RFID filter values for the Global Document Type Identifier (GDTI) and the Aerospace and Defense Identifier (ADI). Additionally, new AIs have been added for encoding in EPC User Memory, harmonising TDS with version 17 of the GS1 General Specifications, and the TID Memory Bank has been aligned with the EPC Gen2 UHF air interface protocol.

3.2 Development work in process 1. Application Standard for Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Objects in Rail Phase 2 (publication

target December 2017)

2. EANCOM® 2002 Edition 2016 (publication target June 2017)

3. GDSN 3.1.3 Maintenance Release Suite of Standards (production deployment target Nov 2017)

4. GDSN 3.1.2.1 Maintenance Release Suite of Standards (production deployment target May 2017)

5. General Specification Standard (publication target July 2017)

6. Global Product Classification (GPC) Standard (publication target June 2017)

7. Global Traceability Standard (GTS) 2 (publication target September 2017)

8. High-speed Barcode Printing (HSBP) Standard (pending ratification)

9. Product Image Specification 3.0 (publication target May 2017)

10. Tagged Item Performance Protocol (TIPP) Phase 2 (publication target May 2017)

Future work planned:

• GS1 XML Maintenance Release 3.4

• EANCOM Major Release

• GDSN 3.1.(TBD) Maintenance Release Suite of Standards (go live target May 2018)

3.3 Work request activity Work requests (WR) entered for new standards or modifications to existing standards.

• 86 work requests were entered this quarter

• 87 work requests were closed this quarter

Figure 3-2 Work Requests submitted to Standards Maintenance Groups

DA, 1, 1%

EDI, 19, 23%

GMD, 40, 49%

GPC, 15, 18%

ID, 7, 9%

49% For GMD



Work Requests are classified and reported in several ways below:

Table 3-1 Work requests submitted for each standard Standard 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Automatic Identification Data Capture (AIDC) * 26 27 31 6

Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) (Transactional Data)

27 37 118 19

Electronic Product Code (Tag Data Standard & UHF)

1 6 3 1

EPCIS & Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) 5 2 3 0

GDSN Package Measurement Rules 4 5 6 1

Global Data Synchronisation 121 218 240 40

Global Product Classification 28 77 123 15

Global Traceability Standard 0 5 1 2

Product Image Specification 9 3 10 1

Other (Process, SmartSearch, New Standard) 3 3 0 0

In assessment 1

Total 224 383 535 86

Table 3-2 Work request submitted by category Category 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Maintenance 209 368 526 83

Development 15 15 9 3

Total 224 383 535 86

Table 3-3 Work requests submitted by region Region 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Americas 89 175 148 21

Asia Pacific 14 10 9 4

Middle East & Africa 0 0 0 0

Europe 121 198 378 61

Total 224 383 535 86

Table 3-4 Work requests submitted by member type

Member type 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Global Office 19 28 22 14

Member Organisation 154 229 364 59

Users 51 126 149 13

Total 224 383 535 86



3.3.1 Top work request submitters

Figure 3-1 Top submitter organisations

3.3.2 Work request aging report The implementation of best-in-class improvements has resulted in a significant reduction of work requests in the system over the last 500 days. Work requests not actionable for standards development were either withdrawn, or sent back to the submitter as “not actionable for standards development”. 90 work requests remain open in GSMP as of 31 March 2017.

Table 3-5 Overall aging report in days Days open = WR submission to end of quarter Under 100 100-200 200-500 Over 500 Total

GSMP Maintenance 63 12 8 83

GSMP Development 2 (GTS 2 & TIPP

phase2)

2 (MRO phase 2 & 1 EDI))

2 (1 EDI & HSBP) 6

In assessment 1 1

Total 66 14 10 90

1 Development Work Request in assessment: 17-082: APIs have become the “Lingua Franca” of the web. GS1 is the “Lingua Franca” of business. As more business moves to the web, GS1 standards must evolve to better support web-enabled technologies.

3.4 Standards Development Work Group Standards Development (SD) Groups are responsible for GS1 system development including, developing GS1 standards, GS1 guidelines, and other deliverables that support their deployment. There are two kinds of SD work groups:

• Standards Maintenance Groups (SMG): SMGs have an indefinite lifetime, are responsible for the on-going maintenance and enhancement of one or more existing GS1 standards or GS1 guidelines.

• Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG): MSWGs are formed to do a specific piece of work as described in its charter, which disbands when the work is complete. Mission-specific Work Groups are created for most work efforts of substantial scope.

Standards Development Work Group overview:

• 5 Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs) are active; Barcodes and Traceability & Event Sharing SMG’s are not active at this time

• 4 Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWGs) are active

Organization 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Totals

GS1 Germany * 22 77 161 2 262

1WorldSync Holdings, Inc. 31 100 86 9 226

GS1 US * 31 49 32 7 119

GS1 Netherlands * 27 34 43 15 119

GS1 France * 25 16 43 14 98

GS1 Canada * 13 14 21 3 51

Carrefour 0 1 37 0 38

GS1 Australia 10 8 9 4 31

GS1 Sweden 5 11 12 2 30

GS1 Spain 6 2 5 5 17

* Top 5 GS1 Member Organisation submitters

81% Of all WR submitted



3.4.1 Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs)

Table 3-6 Standards Maintenance Groups operating Group name Call to action date Group status

Barcodes 15 Apr 2010 Inactive

Data Accuracy (DA) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Global Master Data (GMD) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Global Product Classification (GPC) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Identification (ID) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Traceability and Event Sharing (T&E) 26 May 2011 Inactive

3.4.2 Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG)

Table 3-7 Mission-specific Work Groups operating Group name Call to action date Group status

Application Standard for Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Objects in Rail (MRO) 21 Feb 2016 Phase 2 Working

EPC Information Service (EPCIS) 1.1 and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) 10 Jun 2012 Working

Global Traceability Standard 2 (GTS2) 15 Feb 2017 Working

High-speed Barcode Printing (HSBP) 10 Mar 2016 Inactive/standard awaiting EU decision

Tagged Item Performance Protocol (TIPP) 19 Feb 2015 Phase 2 Working

3.4.2.1 Mission-specific Work Groups closed • EPCIS and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) MSWG

3.5 Performance Work requests are the entry point into the GSMP process to request new standards or modify existing standards per the process and procedures laid out in the GSMP Manual. A Work request becomes a Work Order when it is approved for standards development. The time it takes for a Work Order to be processed in GSMP is measured below.

3.5.1 Standards maintenance work A Work Order is categorised as maintenance if it is a single, or a group of small changes to an existing standard or guideline, that can be developed in a Standards Maintenance Group. Examples: errata, new EDI code values, new symbol placement rules, GDSN Validation Rules.

There are two types of maintenance Work Orders:

• Maintenance Type 1: Simple changes to a standard, considered on-time if it is completed within 180 days (10 day variance permitted)

• Maintenance Type 2: Development time is expected to be longer than 180 days. These are considered on-time, if completed within 365 days (10 day variance)

3.5.1.1 Standards Maintenance Groups’ performance • 99% of all work orders completed in GS1 Standards Maintenance Groups are completed on-

time (within the service level agreement stated above) • The median time for a maintenance work request to complete is 80 days

http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/community/working_groups/gsmp#BC



Table 3-8 Standards Maintenance Groups work request activity summary

Standards Maintenance Group (SMG)

Total WR entered

this quarter

Total WO closed this

quarter

Closed on

time

Additional time

needed

% Closed on-time

Not completed:

Solution exists/bundle/

withdrawn

Open WR 31 March

2017

Data Accuracy (DA) 1 1 1 0 100% 0 0

Electronic Data Interchange (formerly eCom)

19 4 4 0 100% 0 20

Global Master Data (GMD) 40 62 53 9 85% 7 32

Global Product Classification (GPC) 15 16 16 0 100% 3 18

Identification (ID) 7 1 1 0 100% 0 13

Traceability & Event Sharing 0 0 0 0 n/a 0 0

Total (SMG) 82 84 75 9 89% 10 83

Note: Maintenance on-time performance is measured from the submission date, to the GSMP complete date, and ready for ratification (if applicable).

Figure 3-2 - EDI and GMD SMG’s summary and performance

Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Global Master Data (GMD)

Median days

in

development

2014 2015 2016 2017

2014 2015 2016 2017

Top WR submitter GS1 France (11) 1WorldSync Holdings, Inc. (9)

Highlights

− 2017 median days is blank due to lack of data

− GS1 EDI XML Maintenance Release 3.3 was published and ratified Feb 2017

− The EDI Cash Handling sub-team has the manufacturers needed to start work. Requirements will be sent to community review in April

− 9 WR were not delivered on time due to the Validation Rule WR hold in 2016. Major Release was the priority

− 32 WR remain open



Figure 3-3 GPC and ID SMG’s summary and performance

Global Product Classification (GPC) Identification (ID)

Median days

in

development

2014 2015 2016 2017

2014 2015 2016 2017

Top WR submitter GS1 Netherlands (8) GS1 US (1)

Highlights

− 2017 median days is blank due to lack of data

− Phase 2 of the new segment “Crops” was added to support the GS1 Sustainability effort

− The GPC June-2017 publication is in development, new classifications will be added for flags, household furniture, stationary, audio visual and electrical supplies

The group published the General Specification Standard V17 in January and the Tag Data Standard v1.10 in March

ID SMG made progress at the GS1 Standards Event in Jersey City, 2 business cases were motioned for standards development with a July ratification date:

- GTIN Reuse Cessation

- Consumer Product Variant Identifier

A solutions approach was motioned to standards development for Right Shoe / Left shoe

Note: Traceability & Event Sharing SMG was not active in 2016 & 17, Data Accuracy has minimal activity.

Legend:

All WR for year are closed WR are still open for year

3.5.2 Development work A Work Order is categorised as development, if it involves creation of a new standard/guideline, or significant change to existing standard/guideline. Examples: extension to GDSN, a new EPCglobal High Frequency (HF) Air Interface Standard, enhancement to the EPCIS Standard to include aggregation layers, a new barcode symbology, a new Business Message Standard. Development work is on-time, if the work is completed in, or under the estimated time to complete. The estimated completion date is defined in the project plan at the start of the development stage.

Table 3-9 Completed development work on-time performance Work

Request Topic Due date per project plan Date completed On time

16-394 update to GS1's "EPCIS and CBV Implementation Guideline" February 2017 February 2017 Yes



Figure 3-4 Development projects overview for Q 1 2017

Legend:

on-target at risk will not meet target complete

4 Participation Participants in GSMP are organisations (companies or other recognised entities); each organisation is represented by one or more individual persons belonging to that organisation. There is no limit to the number of individuals from a single organisation that may participate. Companies not a member of GS1 are non-voting. There are three types of participating members:

1. GSMP community member (non-voting)

• Company has signed GS1 Intellectual Property (IP) Policy

• Individual has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room

2. GSMP community member (voting)

• Company is a member of GS1

• Company has signed GS1 Intellectual Property (IP) Policy

• Individual has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room

3. GSMP Work Group Member

• Company has signed the GS1 IP Policy

• Company has signed a group Opt-in Agreement

• Member has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room

4.1 GSMP membership • GSMP has 1485 individual members, a 2% increase this quarter • 81 members are non-voting • 962 are from user companies and 523 are from GS1 Member Organisations (MOs) • GSMP has 559 member companies, a 1% increase this quarter • 70 member companies are non-voting

Table 4-1 Membership Growth 2014 2015 2016 2017 ytd

Individuals 1174 1281 1451 1485

Companies 444 498 552 559

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4

Target Date Steering Group Formation Requirements Standard in

Development Collateral Completed

Application Standard for MRO in Rail (Phase 2) Dec 2017

Consumer Product Variant Jul 2017

EDI Cash Handling Machine Messages Jul 2017

Electronic Product Code Information Services (EPCIS) v1.2 Guideline Feb 2017

Global Traceability Standard 2 (GTS2) Sep 2017

Global Trade Item Number (GTIN) Reuse Cessation Jul 2017

High-Speed Barcode Printing (HSBP) Oct 2016

Tagged Item Performance Protocol (TIPP) (Phase 2) May 2017

GSMP Strategic Projects

Ratification pending EU decision



Table 4-2 Individual membership by interest Table 4-3 Member companies by interest category Interest category # of participants Interest category # of companies

Central Banks 12 Central Banks 5

Distributor/Group Purchasing 29 Distributer/Group

Purchasing 14

GS1 Member Organisation 523 GS1 Member Organisation 60

Manufacturer 328 Manufacturer 146

Other 146 Other 82

Retailer/Hospital 135 Retailer/Hospital 61

Solution Provider 312 Solution Provider 191

Total 1485 Total 559

Table 4-4 Member companies by region Region # of Companies

Asia Pacific 45

Europe 277

Middle East & Africa 13

The Americas 224

Total 559

4.2 Voting Each company/organisation represents one vote in GSMP, regardless of the number of associates voting. GSMP requirements and standards are approved by community eBallots. Each eBallot requires approximately 12 votes with additional minimum requirements of supply chain role votes (charter variations may apply).

• The average number of votes per ballot this quarter is 19. 67 ballots passed in GSMP this quarter.

4.3 Event attendance GS1 Global Office hosts two events every year for the GS1 community to collaborate face-to-face on industry needs and the development of GS1 standards. These events are:

• GS1 Standards Event, held in the USA

• GS1 Industry and Standards Event, held in Europe

The GS1 Standards Event took place 20-24 March 2017 in Jersey City, New Jersey, USA. Attending the event were 200 individuals representing 66 companies.



Table 4-5 Event attendance by individual Individual type 2014

Atlanta 2014 Rome

2015 Jersey City

2015 Warsaw

2016 Jersey City

2016 Brussels

2017 Jersey City

Affiliate, Associates, Auto-ID Lab, other

12 24 5 19 5 35 12

Data Pool and Solution Provider 32 68 21 42 25 63 19

Distributor / Group Purchasing and Manufacturer

38 26 28 24 30 29 17

Global Office Staff 51 54 51 53 49 80 50

GS1 MO 82 136 84 126 82 124 92

Hospital / Retailer 11 21 6 15 16 9 10

Total 226 329 195 279 207 340 200

Table 4-6 Event attendance by organisation

By organisation 2014 Atlanta

2014 Rome

2015 Jersey City

2015 Warsaw

2016 Jersey City

2016 Brussels

2017 Jersey City

Affiliate, Associates, Auto-ID Lab, other

11 20 5 15 5 26 7

Data Pool and Solution Provider 21 46 19 32 18 43 13

Distributor / Group Purchasing and Manufacturer

20 22 19 16 24 25 15

Global Office staff 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

GS1 MO 25 32 22 30 24 27 23

Hospital and Retailer 8 13 5 10 13 6 7

Total 86 134 71 104 85 128 66

5 Quality The GSMP defines quality as the entire process employed to ensure that all GS1 standards are user-driven, globally applicable, royalty-free (to the best of our ability) and that ultimately meets the needs and requirements defined by its members.

5.1 Due process All GSMP groups are expected to follow the processes and procedures specified in the GSMP Manual. A community eBallot is used to confirm community consensus to progress a draft standard, or other GSMP deliverable.

5.2 Consensus Decision-making is achieved through consensus, which is defined as approval without sustained opposition. Voting options are yes, no and abstain.

Below are measures of due process and consensus in the GSMP:

• Zero (0) due process infractions

• 87% of eBallots approved this quarter were unanimous, up this quarter

• 99% of votes cast were affirmative, consistent with last quarter



5.3 Satisfaction survey results GS1 issues several surveys to measure satisfaction with GSMP. Survey results are structured in three categories:

• unfavourable = sum of very dissatisfied and fairly dissatisfied

• neutral

• favourable = sum of satisfied and very satisfied

Favourable and unfavourable answers are shown in percent using this structure: fav/unfav. Neutral answers are not used in reporting the survey results, they are viewed as opportunities to move a response to favourable. The results of the three surveys are detailed in the next three sections.

5.3.1 GSMP member satisfaction survey Satisfaction with GSMP was up across the board. Overall satisfaction with GSMP increased to 64% from 57%, with the largest increase in satisfaction with GSMP staff members, to 81% from 66%.

Figure 5-1 GSMP member satisfaction survey results

Table 5-1 GSMP member satisfaction survey results; satisfaction overall, with the staff, and with the process

Questions 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

20122013% FAVS/UNFAVS

Overall satisfaction with GSMP n/a 66/10 57/7 57/13 64/8

Satisfaction with GSMP staff 80/1 84/6 73/4 66/9 81/2

Efficiency of process 49/15 44/19 39/14 43/17 50/8



5.3.2 GS1 Industry and Standards Event March 2017 satisfaction survey

Table 5-2 GS1 Event satisfaction survey results Programme activity 2014

Atlanta 2014 Rome

2015 Jersey City

2015 Warsaw

2016 Jersey City

2016 Brussels

2017 Jersey City

Overall, how satisfied were you with the GS1 Standards Event?

84/9 87/5 93/2 93/1 98/2 97/0 92/2

How satisfied were you with the event facilities? 73/9 60/17 94/2 91/4 99/0 79/6 91/0

How satisfied were you with the week's agenda? 69/16 81/5 75/7 89/11 96/4 98.2 88/13

How satisfied were you with the Tuesday Plenary?

72/9 62/8 76/9 68/16 93/7 80/7 92/0

Average 75% 73% 85% 85% 97% 89% 91%

5.3.3 GS1 Member Organisation satisfaction survey

Favourable responses from GS1 Member Organisations increased to 73% from 64%; GSMP received no unfavourable responses from GS1 Member Organisation CEOs!

Figure 5-2 GSMP MO satisfaction survey results

Table 5-3 GS1 MO satisfaction survey results table

Questions % FAVS/UNFAVS

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Overall satisfaction with GSMP

57/5 61/1 75/2 64/1 73/0

6 GSMP Governance Groups

6.1 Board Committee for Standards (BCS) members Art Smith, GS1 Canada

Barron Witherspoon, Procter & Gamble Co.

Bernie Hogan, GS1 US

Elzbieta Halas, GS1 Poland

Jean-Marc Klopfenstein, Nestlé

Juan Antonio Sanfeliu, Manufacturas Antonio Gassol

5761

75

64

73

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016



Lori Bigler, J.M. Smucker Co.

Maria Palazzolo, GS1 Australia - Chairperson

Michael Rose, Johnson & Johnson

Miguel Lopera, GS1

Ulrich Schaefer, GS1 Germany

Vivek Balasubramanian, Amazon

Volker Zeiner, B. Braun

Wim van Herwijnen, METRO AG

Xavier Barras, GS1 France

6.2 Industry Engagement Steering Committee (IESC) members Ana Paula Maniero, GS1 Brazil

Carrie Wilkie, GS1 US

Cédric Lecolley, GS1 France

Erin Riggs, Procter & Gamble (CGF)

Halim Recham, GS1 Algeria

Jeff Denton, Amerisource Bergen

Joachim Wilkins, C&A Europe / RSC Commercial Services

Loek Boortman, GS1 Netherlands

Mike Sadiwnyk, GS1 Canada

Mike Yorwerth, Tesco Global

Ruediger Hagedorn, Consumer Goods Forum

Virginia Vaamonde, GS1 Brazil

6.3 Architecture Group (AG) members Andreas Fuessler, GS1 Germany

Dave Harty, Adents

Eugen Sehorz, GS1 Austria

Fred Kempkes, Unilever

Gina Tomassi, Pepsico

Henri Barthel, GS1 GO – Co‐Chair

Jens Kungl, Metro Group

Junyu Wang, Fudan Auto-ID Lab

Kevin Dean, GS1 Canada

Marc Cox, Philips

Mark Harrison, Milecastle Media

Paul Reid, GS1 UK

Ray Delnicki, GS1 US

Robert Beideman, GS1 GO

Roberto Matsubayashi, GS1 Brasil

Seán Lightholder, Walmart

Sean Lockhead, GS1 GO

Staffan Olsson, GS1 Sweden



Sue Schmid, GS1 Australia – Co‐Chair

Sylvia Rubio Alegren, ICA

Tony Zhang, FSEnet

Vera Feuerstein, Nestle – Co‐Chair

Xavier Barras, GS1 France

More information Access this document and other GSMP reports at this website: http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/reports

Please contact Eileen Harpell with your questions or suggestions: [email protected]

http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/reports

http://intranet.gs1.org/gsmp/GSMP%20Reporting/Quarterly%20Reports/Q%202%202013/[email protected]

Documents

Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 1st · PDF fileimplementation guideline is intended to provide supply c hain stakeholders, including ... Carrefour 0. 1 37. 0 38. GS1 Australia