Global Geotourim Perspectives

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Global Geotourim Perspectives

    1/2

    Global Geotourism PerspectivesEdited By Ross K. Dowling and David Newsome. GoodfellowPublishers < www.goodfellowpublishers.com > 2010,xii + 250 pp. (figures, maps, photographs, references, indices)29.99 Pbk. ISBN: 978-1-906884-17-8

    Alexander E. GatesRutgers University, USA

    Ross Dowling and David Newsome continue to establish themselves as leadersin eld of scholarly geotourism with their third outstanding edited volume infour years. This volume is considered to be a companion to the Newsome andDowling (2010) edited volume and contains papers on additional geotourism re-sources and scholarly topics. Among the three volumes (including Dowling &Newsome, 2006 ), Dowling and Newsome have managed to cover a signicant pro-portion of the geotourism resources of the world. This is a real contribution tothe eld and will serve as a benchmark for future work. It is a tribute to theirreputation in the profession that they are consistently able to solicit papers from

    some of the true leaders in geotourism. The range of topics in this third volumeis as impressive as the previous two, covering many aspects of the eld of geotou-rism as well as many locations of the world. The descriptions of geotourism re-sources cover numerous countries on six continents including Australia, Brazil,Greece, Japan, Hong Kong, Ireland, Malaysia, Mauritius, Oman, South Africa,and the United States.

    As with the previous two volumes, there is a variety of the aspects of geotou-rism, both in terms of the geology and tourism as illustrated in the examplesby location. There is a very thorough and excellent paper on the many aspectsof geotourism in volcanic areas on a global basis but with emphasis on Japan.Two papers describe the politics and legislative processes in developing and pre-

    serving geotourism resources in Australia especially with regard to dealing withstakeholders. One paper describes how geotourism interfaces with recreationalrock climbing in Australia. There is even a paper on geotourism in a game re-serve in South Africa (Kruger National Park) that presents many concerns forsafety that are not considered in most places. There are several very solid papersdescribing the geotourism resources that have been well developed and are wellattended and operated in certain countries or regions. These areas include Aus-tralia, Brazil, Greece, Ireland, and Oman. Several of these are excellent and com-plete and written by some of the world authorities on geotourism includingNickolas Zouros, one of the founders of the geopark concept. A paper on a geo-park in Hong Kong is also excellent and with complete coverage but adds someconsiderations for developing resources in an urban setting especially with regardto mobile technology. There are also several papers that simply describe the re-sources for geotourism in a single country or area that have minimal develop-ment but that might be developed in the future. These areas include Malaysia;Mauritius, and South Africa. Finally, there are two papers by Dowling and New-some that place geotourism into a global perspective including where the re-sources are well developed and utilized and where there is great opportunity to

    Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 521522, 2012Printed in Great Britain

    Publications in review / Annals of Tourism Research 39 (2012) 503522 521

    http://www.goodfellowpublishers.com/http://www.goodfellowpublishers.com/
  • 8/10/2019 Global Geotourim Perspectives

    2/2

    develop them in the future. These papers are well written and poignant as isusual for Dowling and Newsome.

    There are a few shortcomings to the volume. Although many of the papers are well written and appropriate, the quality is variable among others. One paper onthe Grand Canyon, although well written, has no references making it more of adescription or book chapter than a scholarly article. Another paper on Australiahas references but barely uses them and instead is a discussion on the difcultiesof dealing with stakeholders of geotourism in a colloquial manner. The various pa-pers are not grouped by location or type but rather are intermingled. The volume would have appeared more organized and been easier to navigate if they had beengrouped and labelled. In many cases, the maps and photos in the papers are of poor quality, too small or incomplete which is a detraction considering that thereare numerous breathtaking views and features in almost all of the areas described.They stand out in sharp contrast to the well thought out and executed papers.Finally, unlike the other edited volumes by Dowling and Newsome, this one is a

    bit Australocentric with several of the papers on the geotourism of Australia whichgives the volume a bit of a bias. As usual for Dowling and Newsome, the positive aspects of the volume far out-

    weigh the shortcomings. This volume is yet another signicant contribution to thestudy of the rapidly growing eld of geotourism. It is a pleasure to read and pro- vides a wealth of new information. This is yet another volume of required readingin geotourism.

    Alexander Gates : Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, RutgersUniversity, Newark, NJ 07102, USA. Email .

    REFERENCESDowling, R., & Newsome, D. (Eds.). (2006). Geotourism . Amsterdam: Elsevier, Ltd.Newsome, D., & Dowling, R. (Eds.). (2010). Geotourism: The tourism of geology and

    landscape . London: Goodfellow Publishers Ltd.

    Assigned 10 August 2010. Submitted 23 September 2010. Accepted 21 December 2010.

    doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.11.012

    522 Publications in review / Annals of Tourism Research 39 (2012) 503522

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.11.012http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.11.012