Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
22 January 2014 QED Regulating EU Mobile, Internet and Card Payments Conference Brussels, Belgium Greg Ohm EMEA Emerging Payments Head [email protected]
Global Consumer Bank
2
North America, Europe and Asia are expected to see a surge in adoption on the back of increasing consumer acceptance and concerted efforts by market participants
Africa
Asia
North America
§ Initiatives predominantly targeting the unbanked; M-Pesa huge success story § Opportunity in P2P transfers and Remote payments driven by demand for
mobile recharge. § Discussions related to social disbursements, payroll transfers via mobile could
fuel opportunity
§ Home to markets with advanced mobile cultures that have led proximity initiatives (e.g., Japan, South Korea) – NTT Docomo’s Felica is a major success
§ Relatively less developed markets (e.g., India, China) will experience rapid uptake in P2P payments
§ In most markets, the ecosystem needs to jointly realize the opportunity
§ Significant market momentum (e.g., MCX – major retailers, IsIs – major MNOs); all likely to launch in 2013; Testing ground for major digital disruptors (e.g., Google); Dominant PayPal presence
§ Remote will remain a major opportunity driven by increasing acceptance of m-commerce; Proximity will register largest growth (both NFC and non-NFC variants likely to materialize)
Key Trends Market Size and Distribution (in USD billions, 2016)
Regions
Europe
§ Dominant opportunity in remote payments § Significant interest in contactless payments - France, UK, Poland taking lead in
realizing the opportunity § Market requires ecosystem to rally around the opportunity (similar to France).
Consequently, focus on standards development (SEPA payments, EU e-money directive)
LATAM
§ Mobile payment solutions predominantly targeted at unbanked/ under banked population. SMS based payment service by Oi Paggo over 1mn customers as they addressed need for credit services for the low income segment
§ Services sought would include money transfers, bill payments and retail purchases using a mobile phone
36%
33%
9%
34%
Remote
58% $120 bn
P2P Proximity
38%
$29 bn 38% 28%
$138 bn
45%
39%
$11 bn
27%
29%
4%
18%
$150 bn
62%
Note: Discussion based on observations in the 27 countries analyzed Estimates exclude current and future projections of popular closed loop initiatives (M-Pesa, Felica) to ensure parity in comparing market sizes
Surge in Adoption of Mobile Payments
3
The Evolution of Payments The new generation of payment methods… competitive look
Card Networks Banks and Processors
In the cards network category, we include Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover and China Unionpay. Looking at the big picture, here is what the card networks have achieved in the last six months: § Unveiled incremental details about their proposed respective wallets
(such as partnerships, timelines, etc.); § Focused on targeted offers through either M&A or specific merchant
arrangements or both; and § Worked on expanding their funding reach beyond traditional bank
relationships by investing in prepaid and cash-based funding options.
Telecom Companies In this category, we include not just telecom companies but also a range of technology companies that focus on direct-carrier billing including Boku, Bango, PayOne, payVia and others. The telecom category has been busy as well, having: § Continued the process of starting regional partnerships to introduce
wallets – partners include card networks, technology companies and sometimes, banks;
§ Introduced direct-carrier billing relationships in several geographies; and
§ Made progress on SMS-based (text messaging) mobile payments in several emerging markets.
Based on telecom company actions, support for NFC-based technology seemed very strong among the “developed economy” telecoms, relative to other categories of participants. Obviously in regions where feature phones are more prevalent than smart phone, non-NFC technology is making progress.
On the bank side of this category, we looked at the actions of U.S. and non-U.S. banks while on the processor side, we include technology vendors such as Fiserv, Fidelity National Information Systems, Monetise and Total System. § The processors have unveiled products that could extend mobile
payments capability to smaller financial institutions; § Larger U.S. banks have agreed to collaborate / exchange data to
facilitate person-to-person (P2P) transactions; and § The category as a whole has unveiled regional inter-bank or bank/
telecom collaboration on wallets.
Technology and Internet Companies The obvious candidates in this category are Apple, Facebook, Google and PayPal. Although Amazon and Microsoft are mentioned less often, we believe they will have more to say in the future as Mobile Payments develops. Various point-of-sale (POS) providers constitute a key sub-category within the larger category. The POS providers themselves can be divided into two segments, although there are some companies such as VeriFone and Square that bridge these two segments. § Mobile Payment Acceptance specialists – Essentially these companies sell
card readers. This list includes VeriFone, Square, Revel, iZettele, mPowa, payleven, NCR and others.
§ Loyalty and Targeted offers enablers – This is a long list of companies, which includes Levelup, Cardlytics and other such companies. This is clearly an interesting space and there are a significant number of participants in practically every single category from Banks to Card Networks to Technology Companies who believe they have a right to and an ownership of client data that seems to underpin success in this segment.
Source: Capgemini Analysis 2012
4
Waves of Innovation in Payments Innovation continues to drive a fast moving environment and new market entrants
5
Several players are vying for their ‘piece of the pie’
Early stage exploration, selective launches
All active, consortiums formed, emerging mkt
success
Several partnerships, some live
Broadly reactive, partnerships
forming
Exploring
Forming
Early stage exploration with trials and pilots
Move from trials / pilots to live deployments Norming
Performing
Multiple live initiatives, but limited traction/ commercial success
Commercial deployments with significant traction enjoying profitable operations
Traditional FI
Digital
MNOs
Networks
Agenda Barriers What they Need
Maturity and Timeline
Merchants
Add to VAS portfolio to unlock incremental
revenue, reduce churn, and ensure relevance
Migrate to mobile; Migrate to the physical
world
Protect existing revenue streams; tap into new
revenue streams; reduce costs
Retain their role in the payment processing
value chain and pursue new, direct-to-consumer
value propositions
Consumer trust, financial infrastructure, compliant operations; Mobile banking relationships in place
Limited distribution and reach, cumbersome and slow processes, lack of ‘innovation
culture’
Culture of innovation, access to capital and technology IP, rapid and agile product development, massive
reach and distribution, consumer product familiarity
Distribution and reach – both digitally and physically, customer access and control, leverageable infrastructure –
particularly billing and recharge
Significant reach across markets through network members;
oligopolistic tendency with control of network infrastructure; sets rules
across banks and merchants
Limited financial infrastructure, brand
equity, and regulatory experience
Limited financial infrastructure, brand
equity, and the ability to leverage compelling
existing digital products
Lack direct consumer access, need to
balance ambition with existing interests, lack of ‘innovation culture’
Increase volume and revenue through digital
payments; drive differentiation with
online retailers
Significant distribution and customer engagement; control offers/ rewards; push to online, with an advantage in
connecting online-2-offline; SKU-level data; payment capabilities
Lack a compelling, integrated digital user
experience; closed-loop will require significant
investment & alignment
Exploring Forming Norming Performing
24 months out
Exploring Forming Norming Performing
12-18 months out
Exploring Forming Norming Performing
12 months out
Exploring Forming Norming Performing
18 months out
Early movers gaining traction
Exploring Forming Norming Performing
18-24 months out
Crowd Leaders
Leaders (PayPal, Amazon)
Crowd
Crowd
Crowd
Crowd Leaders (Walmart, Starbucks)
Progress What they Have
6
What business model best aligns with our goals to ensure success?
Business Model Considerations
Bank – Network Collaborative Innovator Retailer Mobile Operator
• Banks/issuers • Payment
Networks Builds on existing network and deploys mobile payment application or devices to customers via bank partners
• Mobile Network Operators (MNOs)
• Banks/Issuers • Payment
Networks
Collaboration among the banks, mobile operators, existing payment networks and other stake-holders in the mobile value chain
• Alternative solution providers
Technology-based solution that leverages existing and complementary mobile assets to develop mobile payment capabilities
• Retailers • Stand-alone
merchants
Merchants create independent, closed-loop payment applications
• Mobile Network Operators (MNOs)
Mobile operator acts independently to deploy mobile payment applications and value added services
Model Participants
Descriptions
The collaborative model poses the most complexity but also holds the most promise for delivery of an end-to-end mobile payments solution to the ecosystem
Source: PWC
7
The Changing Payments Ecosystem - Ensuring a Level Playing Field Non-traditional players continue to disrupt and transform the payments landscape
• Several non-traditional players like Square, PayPal, and others have introduced many new, innovative ecommerce solutions
• Many of these solutions are being readily adopted by consumers – but without some of same protections and rights they expect from their financial institutions
• These new competitors have also disrupted the status quo around traditional roles, relationships, regulation, liability and consumer protection
• This requires all stakeholders to align on a common strategic framework and ensure a level playing field for all participants
Customer • Data protection • Fraud / Security • Refunds • Disputes • T&Cs • Explicit consent
Payment Parties • Transparency • Define contractual
relationships • Allocation of rights &
responsibilities • Fair allocation of
liability • Business case
Regulators • Open, efficient,
innovative, transparent payment systems
• Clear legal framework • Fraud • Balanced liability
reparation • Geographic scope
(outside EU)
8
Thank you.
9
Citi believes that sustainability is good business practice. We work closely with our clients, peer financial institutions, NGOs and other partners to finance solutions to climate change, develop industry standards, reduce our own environmental footprint, and engage with stakeholders to advance shared learning and solutions. Highlights of Citi’s unique role in promoting sustainability include: (a) releasing in 2007 a Climate Change Position Statement, the first US financial institution to do so; (b) targeting $50 billion over 10 years to address global climate change: includes significant increases in investment and financing of renewable energy, clean technology, and other carbon-emission reduction activities; (c) committing to an absolute reduction in GHG emissions of all Citi owned and leased properties around the world by 10% by 2011; (d) purchasing more than 234,000 MWh of carbon neutral power for our operations over the last three years; (e) establishing in 2008 the Carbon Principles; a framework for banks and their U.S. power clients to evaluate and address carbon risks in the financing of electric power projects; (f) producing equity research related to climate issues that helps to inform investors on risks and opportunities associated with the issue; and (g) engaging with a broad range of stakeholders on the issue of climate change to help advance understanding and solutions.
Citi works with its clients in greenhouse gas intensive industries to evaluate emerging risks from climate change and, where appropriate, to mitigate those risks.
efficiency, renewable energy and mitigation
© 2014 Citibank, N.A. All rights reserved. Citi and Citi and Arc Design are trademarks and service marks of Citigroup Inc. or its affiliates and are used and registered throughout the world.
.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates do not provide tax or legal advice. Any discussion of tax matters in these materials (i) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used or relied upon, by you for the purpose of avoid ing any tax penalties and (ii) may have been written in connection with the "promotion or marketing" of any transaction contemplated hereby ("Transaction"). Accordingly, you should seek advice based on your particular circumstances fr om an independent tax advisor.
In any instance where distribution of this communication is subject to the rules of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), this communication constitutes an invitation to consider entering into a derivatives transaction under U .S. CFTC Regulations §§ 1.71 and 23.605, where applicable, but is not a binding offer to buy/sell any financial instrument.
Any terms set forth herein are intended for discussion purposes only and are subject to the final terms as set forth in separate defini tive wri tten agreements. This presentation is not a commitment to lend, syndicate a financing, underwrite or purchase securities, or commit capital nor does i t obligate us to enter into such a commitment, nor are we acting as a fiduciary to you. By accepting this presentation, subject to applicable law or regulation, you agree to keep confidential the information contained herein and the existence of and proposed terms for any Transaction.
Prior to entering into any Transaction, you should determine, without reliance upon us or our affil iates, the economic risks and merits (and independently determine that you are able to assume these risks) as well as the legal, tax and accounting characterizations and consequences of any such Transaction. In this regard, by accepting this presentation, you acknowledge that (a) we are not in the business of providing (and you are not relying on us for) legal, tax or accounting advice, (b) there may be legal, tax or accounting risks associated with any Transaction, (c) you should receive (and rely on) separate and qualified legal, tax and accounting advice and (d) you should apprise senior management in your organization as to such legal, tax and accounting advice (and any r isks associated with any Transaction) and our disclaimer as to these matters. By acceptance of these materials, you and we hereby agree that from the commencement of discussions with respect to any Transaction, and notwithstanding any other provision in this presentation, we hereby confirm that no participant in any Transaction shal l be limited from disclosing the U .S. tax treatment or U.S. tax structure of such Transaction.
We are required to obtain, verify and record certain information that identifies each entity that enters into a formal business relationship with us. We will ask for your complete name, street address, and taxpayer ID number. We may also request corporate formation documents, or other forms of identification, to verify information provided.
Any prices or levels contained herein are preliminary and indicative only and do not represent bids or offers. These indications are provided solely for your information and consideration, are subject to change at any time without notice and are not intended as a sol icitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any instrument. The information contained in this presentation may include results of analyses from a quantitative model which represent potential future events that may or may not be realized, and is not a complete analysis of every material fact representing any product. Any estimates included herein constitute our judgment as of the date hereof and are subject to change without any notice. We and/or our affil iates may make a market in these instruments for our cus tomers and for our own account. Accordingly, we may have a position in any such instrument at any time.
Although this material may contain publicly avai lable information about Citi corporate bond research, fixed income strategy or economic and market analysis, Citi pol icy (i ) prohibits employees from offering, directly or indirec tly, a favorable or negative research opinion or offer ing to change an opinion as consideration or inducement for the receipt of business or for compensation; and ( ii) prohibits analysts from being compensated for specific recommendations or views contained in research reports. So as to reduce the potential for conflicts of interest, as well as to reduce any appearance of conflicts of interest, Citi has enacted policies and procedures designed to lim it communications between its investment banking and research personnel to specifically prescribed circumstances.