Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Global Activities 2016Shelter/NFI WASH Cash Coordination CCCM DTMMay 2017
*This value is based on IOM operations reported by the missions. It also includes beneficiaries from other divisions due to the cross-sectoral nature of some activities and/or projects. Values include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.
Throughout 2016, IOM operations assisted 26.2 million beneficiaries globally*.
The information captured in this document was consolidated from a data collection exercise, carried out in January 2017 and is wholly based on the responses obtained from each mission. A total of 88 country offices were contacted to complete a survey covering activities in shelter, water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), Cash-Based Interventions (CBI), Camp Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) operations and capacity building, sectoral coordination, and DTM. From those contacted, responses were received from 77 missions. The results presented here cover activities related to preparedness and response which started, were underway, or ended in 2016.
It is important to note that beneficiary numbers for each thematic area cannot be summed up since beneficiaries may have benefitted from more than one type of project.
All maps included in this document are for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. All information is the best available at the time when the map was produced.
May 2017
Preparedness and response activities in 2016
Photo credits: Muse Mohammed/IOM (cover page) and Eunjin Jeong/IOM 2015.Icons were taken from the Noun Project: Dilayorganci, L. Delgalo, M. Kulikov, T. Knopp, A. Rodriguez, Y. Luck, L. Prado, T. Helbig, A. Ahmed, C. Gomboli, DTE Media.
Global Highlights 2016
Global Highlights 2016 Global Highlights 2016 1
NFI
14,600 34,400
27,000935,000
62,200
39,000
Total family tents set upHouseholds assisted with cash transfers**
Shelter repairs and upgrades
Households reached with non-food items
Newly built shelters
Individuals who receivedshelter trainings
* Individual beneficiaries are estimated based on average household size by country
Philippines
Vanuatu
BangladeshThailand
Sri Lanka
Myanmar
Papua New Guinea
Micronesia (FSM)
MarshallIslands (RMI)
Zimbabwe
Central African Republic
Democratic Republicof the Congo
EthiopiaSomalia
Yemen
Kenya
BurundiRwanda
Chad
Peru
South SudanNigeriaCameroon
MauritaniaDominica
Iraq
SyriaJordan
LebanonHaitiHaiti PakistanNepal
Afghanistan
Fiji
Ecuador
Mexico
El Salvador
GuatemalaHonduras
Costa Rica
Hungary
Malawi
Malaysia
Greece
CroatiaFYROM
0-5,000 5-20,000 20-50,000 50-100,000 >100,000 >500,000 individual
Niger Sudan
Turkey
EgyptLibya
Mali
Ukraine
Estimated number of beneficiaries in shelter/NFI operations (2016)
Shelter/NFI operations
Total households assisted 986,000
Estimated total*Individuals assisted 5,220,000
Number ofcountries 52
2016
1,003,000
5,230,000
40
2015
** Including cash transfers related to shelter/NFI activities
individualbeneficiaries
Global Highlights 2016 2119
240
591
658
1,500
1,650
1,740
1,886
2,090
2,200
3,000
3,684
3,795
4,000
4,192
4,330
4,375
5,000
5,290
5,673
5,969
6,709
6,820
6,920
7,400
9,182
11,382
12,974
13,560
13,845
16,784
23,745
26,910
37,820
43,421
43,685
52,532
57,023
63,583
90,666
100,551
101,796
111,308
126,250
162,568
176,613
197,905
623,208
659,940
684,412
740,100
931,882
Dominica
FYR Macedonia
Malawi
Thailand
Hungary
Zimbabwe
Kenya
Guatemala
Papua New Guinea
Malaysia
Somalia
Honduras
Chad
Vanuatu
Peru
Philippines
Mauritania
Mexico
Costa Rica
Croatia
El Salvador
Sri Lanka
Micronesia
Rwanda
Greece
Cameroon
Mali
Jordan
Bangladesh
Egypt
Ecuador
Slovenia
Burundi
Ukraine
Marshall Islands
Fiji
Libya
DRC
Afghanistan
Myanmar
Ethiopia
Niger
Pakistan
Yemen
Sudan
Turkey
Nigeria
Iraq
Nepal
Whole of Syria
Haiti
South Sudan
Shelter/NFI operations
Estimated number of individual beneficiaries in Shelter/NFI operations (2016)
South SudanValues include beneficiaries reached through the NFI pipeline, managed by IOM, as well as life-saving interventions in Protection of Civilian sites across South Sudan.
HaitiThese values also include the all beneficiaries reached through the IOM-managed NFI pipeline in Haiti, both through direct distributions and implementing partners.
Whole of SyriaBeneficiaries include those assisted directly within Syria, as well as cross-border activities from Gazientep and Amman.
Global Highlights 2016 Global Highlights 2016 3
133
400
542
1,196
2,200
2,506
4,055
4,956
5,000
5,168
7,028
10,014
10,137
11,920
19,596
21,229
28,490
30,000
50,000
57,023
64,926
68,212
72,000
86,295
324,565
408,982
525,125
588,673
635,913
709,503
Croatia
Macedonia
Thailand
Sri Lanka
Malaysia
Libya
Malawi
Mauritania
Palau
Turkey
Rwanda
Myanmar
Philippines
Greece
Mozambique
Nepal
Marshall Islands
Uganda
Burundi
DRC
Ukraine
Bangladesh
Papua New Guinea
Mali
Pakistan
Somalia
Haiti
Yemen
Sudan
South Sudan
Water, Sanitation and Hygiene
Estimated totalindividuals assisted 3,750,000Number of
countries 30
541,000
Individuals servedwith sanitation activities
1,270,000
Individuals servedwith safe water
433,000
Individuals servedwith latrines
2,063,000
Individuals servedwith hygiene promotion
Estimated total number of WASH beneficiaries by country (2016)
South SudanValues include persons who benefitted from hygiene items distributed through IOM's WASH NFI pipeline, as well as those assisted with life-saving WASH activities in Protection of Civilian (PoC) sites.
SudanOver 40% of the beneficiaries have benefitted from hygiene promotion.
YemenThe estimated number of beneficiaries quoted above includes those who benefitted from a water network rehabilitation project (328,064), as well as distribution of water containers and purification filters (89,704).
Haiti95% of the beneficiaries reached benefitted from hygiene promotion activities.
Somalia64% of beneficiaries reached were assisted with access to safe water.
Global Highlights 2016 453
4,416
7,240
17,500
19,566
31,736
39,862
42,190
51,661
111,506
5,244
39
117,385
20,225
42,332
43,145
17,931
E-payments
Not specified
Remittance agency
ATM/Debit card
Vouchers & Cheques
Coupons
Cheques
Bank transfer
Cash in envelope
Vouchers
2015
2016
*
**
Implementing Partner
IOM Direct
Cash-based interventions
Total number of beneficiaries 327,000
Total amount paid to beneficiaries $10,550,000
Number ofcountries 17
2016
246,000
$11,000,000
14
2015
Implementationmechanism*
IOM DirectImplementation
66%
2015 91%
2016
PartnerImplementation
34%
20159%
2016
Total beneficiaries by method of delivery
$$
Excluding AVRR and other programmes with cash components
* Turkey accounts for 74% of this value (winterization)** Philippines accounts for 84% of this value
In 2016, IOM implemented 52 cash based inter-ventions in 17 countries, reaching over 300,000 beneficiaries. The programmes ranged from cash for work or rent programmes, construction materials and shelter reconstruction, as well as providing unconditional cash to cover basic needs of refugees.
Vouchers
Bank transfer
Cheques
Coupons
Combination
Not specified
E-payments
Cash in envelope
ATM/debit card
Remittance agency
53
1,385
7,240
17,500
19,566
31,736
39,862
42,177
53,722
114,142
5,244
39
117,385
20,225
42,332
43,145
17,931
20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000
Global Highlights 2016 Global Highlights 2016 5
$15,106
$22,500
$23,680
$69,402
$92,723
$100,600
$137,208
$258,600
$303,120
$352,905
$559,800
$766,446
$931,000
$1,161,363
$1,531,042
$1,705,136
$2,525,951
Thailand
Malawi
Guinea Conakry
DR Congo
Afghansitan
Lebanon
Nepal
Ecuador
Yemen
Rwanda
Somalia
Egypt
Turkey
Pakistan
Central African Republic
Ukraine
Micronesia
Total amount paid to beneficiaries
Cash-based interventionsExcluding AVRR and other programmes with cash components
MicronesiaThe program provided 1,169 households with vouchers for contruction materials or tool kits.
UkraineThe programmes provided 4,712 households with unconditional cash transfers for IDPs to cover basic needs, and 1014 households with cash for rent.
Central African RepublicA cash for work programme implemented in conflict-affected areas, giving youth at risk an alternative, as well as revitalizing the local market.
99
1,258
6,035
17,064
77,951
3,730
12,839
23,951
85,665
98,791
- 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000
Medical
Livelihoods
Transport
Other
Cash for work
Cash for rent
Shelter
Modality Conditional
Unconditional
Modality*
ConditionalTransfers
69%
2015 29%
2016
UnconditionalTransfers
31%
201571%
2016Total beneficiaries by conditionality
Multi-purpose
Winterization
Constr. materials
Shelter construction
Cash for rent
Cash for work
Other**
TransportTransport
Livelihoods
Medical
Oth
erSh
elte
r
* Based on total number of beneficiaries assisted** Cash for food, hygiene and basic needs of refugees in Turkey
Global Highlights 2016 6
CCCM, 10
WASH, 3
Food Security, 1Health, 4
Merged CCCM, Shelter, NFI,
10
Displacement WG, 3Shelter WG, 3
Merged Shelter & WASH WG, 1
Health WG, 1
Inter Sector Coordination, 2
Recovery, 2
Protection, 2
Other, 24
Philippines
Vanuatu
BangladeshPapua New Guinea
MarshallIslands (RMI)
Central African Republic
Democratic Republicof the Congo
EthiopiaSomalia
Yemen
Kenya
BurundiRwanda
South SudanNigeria
Dominican Republic
IraqHaitiHaiti PakistanNepal
Afghanistan
Ecuador
Greece
Timor Leste
Tajikistan
CambodiaGuinea
Mozambique
Colombia
Paraguay
ChadNiger Sudan
Turkey
Humanitarian response coordination
Countries included in data collection with coordination activities
Number ofcountries 34
Beneficiaries as a collective by sectors where IOM has got a coordination role
PIN - 43.1 Million
Targeted 27.3
Million
Reached /Covered
15.3 Million
In 2016, IOM held a coordination role in 52 cluster/sector/working group coordination platforms across 34 countries. This role varied from lead to co-lead or chairing such groups in a variety of thematic sectors and also Inter-Sector platforms. Three quarters of these coordination platforms were related to CCCM and Shelter activities in preparedness, response and transition phases. The contexts varied from natural disasters to conflict or complex situations including outbreaks and mixed migration flows. Information compiled reflects a “snapshot in time” based on information compiled which is not complete and subject to local interpretation of coordination arrangements.
A “cluster” is a formally activated cluster, i.e. a cluster activated in accordance with the procedures detailed in the agreed IASC policy on the matter, the Cluster Coordination Reference Module.
Cluster
A sector denotes a humanitarian coordination mechanism led by national Government or a designated national agency. International humanitarian support can augment national capacity, underpinned by the principles of the cluster approach.
Sector
A merged cluster denotes an arrangement whereby two clusters agree to merge into one entity. The resulting entity takes over the tasks of the initial clusters.
Merged Cluster
Sectoral breakdown
Dis
tinct
clu
ster
s an
d se
ctor
s
Brea
kdow
n of
var
ious
wor
king
gr
oups
and
task
forc
es
Shelter, 10
Global Highlights 2016 Global Highlights 2016 7
Philippines
Vanuatu
BangladeshPapua New Guinea
MarshallIslands (RMI)
Central African Republic
Democratic Republicof the Congo
EthiopiaSomalia
Yemen
Kenya
BurundiRwanda
South SudanNigeria
Dominican Republic
IraqHaitiHaiti PakistanNepal
Afghanistan
Ecuador
Greece
Timor Leste
Tajikistan
CambodiaGuinea
Mozambique
Colombia
Paraguay
ChadNiger Sudan
Turkey
IOM WASH Operations in 2016Humanitarian response coordination
Countrieswith formallyactivatedclusters
Countrieswith Sectorsand/orWorkinggroups
Countries with activated clusters with either all clusters active, or a mix of clusters & sectors
15
Countries with Sectors and/or working groups
19
71%
69%
63%
86%
86%
80%
Gender, age and diversity characteristics of the affected populationintegrated in assessments, analysis, cluster plans and monitoring.
Joint sectoral analyses of situation exists
Cluster_Sector Strategic plan exists
Mapping of partners and activities
Up-to-date lists of partners exists
Up-to-date meeting schedule exists 79%
85%
85%
62%
67%
69%
Reflection of performance of clusters/sectors where IOM has got a coordination role
Goo
d Pe
rfor
man
ce
49%
47%
29%
41%
41%
55%
49%
Mechanism to raise awareness, prevent, monitor and respond to SEA
or other advocacy documents produced by the cluster on behalf of thePress releases or other advocacy documents produced by the cluster on behalf of the affected population
Sectoral & Cluster staffing with dedicated IM capacity
Sectoral & Cluster staffing with full time coordinator in place
Preparedness plans for identified hazards exist and up-to-date
Cluster & Sector transition strategy exists
Mechanism to consult and involve affected people in decision-making
Mechanism to raise awareness, prevent, monitor and respond to SEA
49%
54%
40%
40%
29%
46%
48%
48%
Und
er P
erfo
rman
ce
Scenarios
Natural disaster,26
Cross-border delivery, 2
Mixed migration flows, 1
Outbreaks, 1
Complex, 13
Conflict, 17
Cluster & Sector strategic plan exists
Global Highlights 2016 8
CCCM Operations
Type of CCCM operationsGiven its role as Cluster lead, information manage-ment, including Site Assessment and Registration (DTM operations), are the main CCCM activities IOM is engaged in for CCCM operations.
There are opportunities to strenghten CCCM activities in participation and coordination of service provision at site level.
Implementation mechanismUse of cash in CCCM operations(Feedback from Haiti, Nepal and DRC)
Use of Cash in CCCM operations(Feedback from Haiti, Nepal and DRC)
Camp Closure Care and Maintenance (ES/NFI distribution)
CampClosure
67%Care & Maintenance(ES/NFI distribution)
33%
25% of the missions engaged in CCCM OPS report using cash, mainly in relation to Camp Closure (Return/Relocation Cash Grant).
Direct Implementation Vs Implementing partners
IPs Only Mixed Direct
ImplementingPartners only
8%
MixedImplementation
25%IOM DirectImplementation
67%
The largest part of our CCCM operations are implemented directly.
Vanuatu
Central African Republic
Democratic Republicof the Congo
Burundi
South SudanNigeria
IraqHaitiHaitiNepal
Ecuador
Croatia
ChadNiger
Countries included in data collection with CCCM operations
Number ofcountries 13
Number of countries
11
10
10
8
9
7
5
Service monitoring
Registration / Profiling
Participation
Camp selection /planning
Care and Maintenance
Camp closure
Coordination at site level
Camp set up or closure
41 sites
Camp management*
494 sites
* Monitoring and coordinating service provision at camp level, as well as setting up governance & community participation mechanisms
Global Highlights 2016 Global Highlights 2016 9
7
4
4
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
Establishing Committees / Governance structures
Participatory Assessment
Community Mobilization / Work opportunities
Complaint / Feedback Mechanisms
Regular meetings with power brokers
Conflict Resolution Mechanism
Community events / Recreational activities
Capacity Building of camp residents
Info Desk
Hotline
CCCM Operations
WASH33%
Shelter33%
Communal Infrastructures
11%
Health11%
Decommissioning6%
Electricity/IT6%
Main Care and Maintenance Activities
Main care and maintenance activities
Care and Maintenance activities in camps mainly target Shelter and WASH infrastructures.
There are opportunities to focus on communal infrastructures (meeting venue, space to organize events, religious building, safe spaces, etc.) which will further support the participation of the affected population.
Type of activities promoting increased participation of affected populationsEstablishing Camp Committee remains the main activity implemented to improve participation at site level.
Investment in other mechanisms such as capacity building which targets camp residents leadership skills should be expanded to additional areas of operations.
Donor supporting CCCM operations(Proportion of CO supported)
Number of countries
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
US (USAID, PRM, OFDA)
ECHO
JAPAN
CERF
DFID
Other donors: CEB, Resident Coordinator Office,MAECD, EC, Norway, NORCAP, CHF, Switzerland
Donor supporting CCCM Operations (Proportion of CO supported)
Other Donors**
** Such as CEB, Resident Coordinator Office, MEACD, EC, Norway, NORCAP, CHF, Switzerland
Vanuatu
Central African Republic
Democratic Republicof the Congo
Burundi
South SudanNigeria
IraqHaitiHaitiNepal
Ecuador
Croatia
ChadNiger
Camp care & maintenance
151 sites
Global Highlights 2016 10
CCCM Capacity-building
Number ofcountries 45 Number of
trainings 306
Philippines
Vanuatu
Bangladesh
Myanmar
MarshallIslands (RMI)
Democratic Republicof the Congo
Yemen
Burundi
South SudanNigeria
Dominica
IraqHaitiHaiti PakistanNepal
Fiji
Ecuador
Costa Rica
Malawi
Indonesia
Greece
Austria
FYR Macedonia
Mozambique
BotswanaZambia
Angola
Laos
Ghana
Burkina Faso Saudi Arabia
Armenia
Argentina
Uruguay
Paraguay
Bolivia
GuyanaGuyanaVenezuelaVenezuela
Panama
Nicaragua
Republic of Korea
ChadMali
Syria
Mongolia
Countries included in data collection for CCCM capacity-building
Asia and the Pacific, 35%
Central and North America, & the Caribbean, 2%
East Africa, 9%
Eastern and Southeastern Europe & Central Asia, 1%European Economic Area, 2%
Middle East and North Africa, 3%
South America, 14%
Southern Africa, 29%
West and Central Africa, 5%
Events by Region
Events by setting
Peri-Urban Urban
Rural
Natural disaster, 52%
Conflict, 22%
Mixed migration, 20%
Not specified, 6%
Myanmar
Ecuador
Zambia
South Sudan
Mozambique
Angola
Botswana
Nepal
Nigeria
Philippines 12
12
12
18
19
22
23
23
36
57
Number of events by country (Top 10)
IOM provided training on CCCM, DTM, and GBV mainstreaming, to governments and humanitarian partners in the last year. CCCM related training events took place around mostly natural disaster scenarios and close to half of them in the emergency response phase. The predominant countries were in West Africa (Nigeria), Myanmar and Central America (Ecuador) where the April earthquake suddenly displaced thousands of people in the last year. CCCM training of national and local authorities aims to capacitate authorities to be able to respond to new disasters, migration situations and DRR. To make knowledge more easily accessible, and to encourage self-learning, an e-learning platform was developed and will be ready for learners to self study in April 2017. In line with the localization agenda, focus shifted to creating cadres of national CCCM trainers in high risk countries, rather than investing in external experts.
Global Highlights 2016 Global Highlights 2016 11
CCCM Capacity-building
Philippines
Vanuatu
Bangladesh
Myanmar
MarshallIslands (RMI)
Democratic Republicof the Congo
Yemen
Burundi
South SudanNigeria
Dominica
IraqHaitiHaiti PakistanNepal
Fiji
Ecuador
Costa Rica
Malawi
Indonesia
Greece
Austria
FYR Macedonia
Mozambique
BotswanaZambia
Angola
Laos
Ghana
Burkina Faso Saudi Arabia
Armenia
Argentina
Uruguay
Paraguay
Bolivia
GuyanaGuyanaVenezuelaVenezuela
Panama
Nicaragua
Republic of Korea
ChadMali
Syria
Mongolia
Training workshops91%
Not specified, 3%
On the job training, 2%
E-Learning, 2%
Coaching, 1%
Types of capacity-building
Prevention and mitigation, 8%
Recovery and rehabilitation, 9%
Preparedness, 32%
Relief and response, 46%
Not specified, 5%
English
118 events in 19 countries
Spanish
47 events in 10 countries
Portuguese
41 events in 2 countries
Burmese
35 events in 1 country
20 events 3 countries
* Size of circle based on proportion of number of events** Humanitarian Border Management
Arabic13 events in 4 countries
French11 events in 6 countries
Urdu
Bahasa
Lao
Mongolian
Macedonian
English + local language
Language and translation of events
0.3%
2%
6%
8%
8%
72%
0 50 100 150 200 250
HBM during migration crisis
Validation or development of good practice
training of others (ToT)
Cluster coordinators
Policy development & Action planning
Direct application for the benefit of IDPs
Application of training content
Type of capacity-building events by phase of operation
Training of Trainers (ToT)
**
Global Highlights 2016 12
Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM)
Peak number of IDPs tracked* Over 14.5 million
Active operations as of December 2016 40 Active operations
during 2016 44
SyriaIraqNigeriaYemenSouth Sudan
Top 5 countries representing approx 80% of caseload tracked:
LibyaEcuadorFijiGuatemalaEl SalvadorHonduras
Countries with displacement tracking activities (2016)
Displacement tracking activities in 2016
New operations set up in 2016:
PhilippinesMyanmar
Democratic Republicof the Congo
Yemen
Burundi
South SudanNigeria
Iraq
SyriaHaitiHaiti
AfghanistanNepal
Fiji
Ecuador Indonesia
Mozambique
Papua New Guinea
Zimbabwe
CameroonCentral African Republic
EthiopiaSomaliaColombia
Honduras
El SalvadorEl Salvador
Guatemala
Libya
MaliChad
Global Highlights 2016 Global Highlights 2016 13
44
Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM)
Flow monitoring activities in 2016
BulgariaFranceFYR MacedoniaGreat BritainGreeceHungaryIraq
Flow monitoring operations 2016
PhilippinesMyanmar
Democratic Republicof the Congo
Yemen
Burundi
South SudanNigeria
Iraq
SyriaHaitiHaiti
AfghanistanNepal
Fiji
Ecuador Indonesia
Mozambique
Papua New Guinea
Zimbabwe
CameroonCentral African Republic
EthiopiaSomaliaColombia
Honduras
El SalvadorEl Salvador
Guatemala
Libya
MaliChad
Yemen
South SudanNiger
SyriaHaitiHaiti
AfghanistanPakistan
SomaliaColombia
Costa Rica
Britain
Netherlands
FranceItaly
HungaryCroatia
SerbiaBulgaria
Turkey
Greece
FYR Macedonia
Libya
Mali
Countries with flow monitoring activities (2016)
Activities in the Mediterranean migration routes span across 15 countries, including origin and final destination countries.
Surveys conducted to nearly 20,000 migrants
32 rounds of information products Over 200,000 views
on website portal (migration.iom.int)
Other activities outside of the Mediterranean migration routes:
Cross border monitoring in 6 countries
Movements in and out of PoC sites in 1 country
Afghanistan ColombiaCosta RicaFYR MacedoniaGreece ItalyLibya
MaliNigerSerbiaSomaliaSouth SudanYemen
ItalyLibyaNetherlandsNigerSerbiaTurkey
Surveys in: Flow monitoring points in:
Note: Countries marked in bold were newly set up in 2016