28
Soeren Gies Determination of suitable driver materials for electromagnetic sheet metal forming I²FG Workshop Impulse Forming May 7 th , 2013 Gent, Belgium

Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

Soeren Gies

Determination of suitable driver materials for electromagnetic sheet metal forming

I²FG Workshop

Impulse Forming

May 7th, 2013 Gent, Belgium

Page 2: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

2 I 27

Introduction

Effect of driver sheets

State of the art

Experimental setup and procedure

Results

Summary and Outlook

Agenda

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 3: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

3 I 27

Introduction

Effect of driver sheets

State of the art

Experimental setup and procedure

Results

Summary and Outlook

Agenda

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 4: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

4 I 27

Introduction

Objective: Electromagnetic forming of stainless steel

1.4301 and 1.4509

Challenge: Low electrical conductivity of stainless steel

Solution: Use of driver sheets

Copper Aluminum Steel Stainless steel

CU-ETP CU-DHP EN AW-1050A EN AW-5083 DC06 1.4301 1.4509

57 MS/m 43 MS/m 34 MS/m 16 MS/m 8 MS/m 1.5 MS/m

100% 75% 60% 28% 14% 2,6%

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 5: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

5 I 27

Working principle of driver sheets:

Introduction

Driver sheet

Workpiece

Upper tool(Forming die)

Lower tool(Flat working coil)

Coil winding

Coil winding

t Dt W

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Workpiece: 1.4301, tW = 0.8 mm

Driver: Aluminum, tD=0.8 mm

Page 6: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

6 I 27

Introduction

Effect of driver sheets

State of the art

Experimental setup and procedure

Results

Summary and Outlook

Agenda

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 7: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

7 I 27

Effect of driver sheets

Energy

supply

Charging

energyForming

energy

Forming-

result

electromagnetic system (ƞ1) mechanical system (ƞ2)

Coil

energy

Kinetic

energy

magn.

pressure

Ohmic heating

Magnetic flux lines in the air

Elastic energy in the die

Use of driver sheets causes two opposing effects in the energy conversion sequence

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Energy conversion sequence: Risch, 2009

Page 8: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

8 I 27

Effect of driver sheets

Energy

supply

Charging

energy

electromagnetic system (ƞ1) mechanical system (ƞ2)

Kinetic

energy

magn.

pressure

Ohmic heating

Magnetic flux lines in the air

Elastic energy in the die

Coil

energyForming

energy

Forming-

result

Forming energy driver sheet

Trade off: higher magnetic pressure vs. additional forming energy

Use of driver sheets causes two opposing effects in the energy conversion sequence

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 9: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

9 I 27

MAX

Effect of driver sheets

Use of driver sheets is beneficial if the following condition is fulfilled:

Additional kinetic energy Ekin

Additional forming energy for driver Eform

Optimum

Question: Which driver material and which driver thickness tD

maximize the energy ratio?

Additional kinetic energy � Additional forming energy for driver

Self-evident consequences: - High electrical conductivity → Ekin

- Low yield strength → Eform

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 10: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

10 I 27

Introduction

Effect of driver sheets

State of the art

Experimental setup and procedure

Results

Summary and Outlook

Agenda

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 11: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

11 I 27

State of the art

Scientific investigations using driver sheets:

– Seth et al. (2004)• Workpiece: Low-alloy carbon steel, tW = 0.1 mm – 0.38 mm

• Driver: Aluminium EN AW-6111 T4, tD = 1 mm

– Li et al. (2012)• Workpiece: Ti-6Al-4V, tW = 0.5 mm

• Driver: CU-DHP, tD = 0.5 mm

– Andersson and Syk (2008)• Workpiece: X5CrNiMo17-12-2, tW = 0.25 mm / DP600, tW = 0.7 mm

• Driver: Copper, tD = 0.6 mm

– Srinivasan et al. (2010)• Workpiece: Titanium, tW = 0.076 mm

• Driver: Copper, tD = 0.381 mm

– Ishibashi et al. (2011)• Workpiece: X5CrNi18-10, tW = 0.15 mm

• Driver: EN AW-1050-H24, tD = 0.3 mm�� �� Workpiece thickness�� �� Driver thickness� �� Skin depth

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 12: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

12 I 27

State of the art

Scientific investigations using driver sheets:

– Tillmann et al. (2008)• Workpiece: DC04, tW = 0,8 mm

• Driver: Copper (sputtered), tD = 0,65 mm (optimum)

• Recommendation: tD = σs

– Bely et al. (1977)• Recommendation: tD = 0,5 · σs

– Desai et al. (2011)• Workpiece: Stainless steel

• Driver: Aluminum, Copper

• Recommendation: Aluminum → tD = 0,8 · σs / Copper → tD = σs

Contradicting recommendations

No recommendation regarding optimal driver material

No consideration of mechanical workpiece parameters

– �� �� Workpiece thickness�� �� Driver thickness� �� Skin depth

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 13: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

13 I 27

Introduction

Effect of driver sheets

State of the art

Experimental setup and procedure

Results

Summary and Outlook

Agenda

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 14: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

14 I 27

Free forming of workpiece and driver

Experimental Setup and Procedure

Lower tool(Flat coil)

Upper tool(Drawing ring)

t Dt W

1

100 mm

80 mm

65 mm

17 mm

Coil winding

Pulse generator used: Maxwell Magneform 7000

Inner resistance Ri = 4.2 mΩInner inductance Li = 60 nH

Max. charging energy EC = 20 kJShort circuit frequency f* = 25 kHz

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 15: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

15 I 27

Free forming of workpiece and driver

Experimental Setup and Procedure

Lower tool(Flat coil)

Upper tool(Drawing ring)

t Dt W h

W

hw = Workpiece forming heighttw = Workpiece thicknesstD = Driver thickness

Measuring of

workpiece height hw

1 2

100 mm

80 mm

65 mm

17 mm

Coil winding

Pulse generator used: Maxwell Magneform 7000

Inner resistance Ri = 4.2 mΩInner inductance Li = 60 nH

Max. charging energy EC = 20 kJShort circuit frequency f* = 25 kHz

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 16: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

16 I 27

Experimental Setup and Procedure

Scope of investigations:

– Workpiece material

• 1.4301, tW = 0.5 / 0.8 / 1.0 mm

• 1.4509, tW = 0.5 / 0.8 / 1.0 mm

• DC04, tW = 0.5 / 0.8 / 1.0 mm

• EN AW-5083, tW = 1.0 mm

– Driver material

• CU-ETP, tD = 0.3 / 0.5 / 0.7 / 0.8 / 1.0 / 2.0 mm

• EN AW-1050A, tD = 0.3 / 0.5 / 0.7 / 0.8 / 1.0 / 2.0 mm

– Charging Energy EC

• EC = 1.0 / 1.8 / 2.4 kJ

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 17: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

17 I 27

Introduction

Effect of driver sheets

State of the art

Experimental setup and procedure

Results

Summary and Outlook

Agenda

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 18: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

18 I 27

Results

100 mm

80 mm

65 mm

17 mm

t Dt W

hW

hw = Workpiece forming heighttw = Workpiece thicknesstD = Driver thickness

Workpiece:Material 1.4509

Thickness tW = 0.8 mm

Fo

rmin

g h

eig

ht

hw

in m

m

0

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

Driver thickness tD

Skin depth σS

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

12

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 19: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

19 I 27

Results

100 mm

80 mm

65 mm

17 mm

t Dt W

hW

hw = Workpiece forming heighttw = Workpiece thicknesstD = Driver thickness

Workpiece:Material 1.4509

Thickness tW = 0.8 mm

Fo

rmin

g h

eig

ht

hw

in m

m

0

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

Driver thickness tD

Skin depth σS

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

12

Optimum

tD ≈ 1.05 σS

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 20: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

20 I 27

Results

100 mm

80 mm

65 mm

17 mm

t Dt W

hW

hw = Workpiece forming heighttw = Workpiece thicknesstD = Driver thickness

Workpiece:Material 1.4509

Thickness tW = 0.8 mm

Fo

rmin

g h

eig

ht

hw

in m

m

0

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

Driver thickness tD

Skin depth σS

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

12

Optimum

tD ≈ 1.05

EForm Driver Forming EnergyEKin Kinetic energy

�� ���

���������

���

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 21: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

21 I 27

Results

100 mm

80 mm

65 mm

17 mm

t Dt W

hW

hw = Workpiece forming heighttw = Workpiece thicknesstD = Driver thickness

Workpiece:Material 1.4509

Thickness tW = 0.8 mm

Fo

rmin

g h

eig

ht

hw

in m

m

0

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

Driver thickness tD

Skin depth σS

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

12

Optimum

tD ≈ 1.05

EForm Driver Forming EnergyEKin Kinetic energy

�� ���

���������

���

�� ���

���������

���

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 22: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

22 I 27

Results

100 mm

80 mm

65 mm

17 mm

t Dt W

hW

hw = Workpiece forming heighttw = Workpiece thicknesstD = Driver thickness

Workpiece:Material 1.4509

Thickness tW = 0.8 mm

Fo

rmin

g h

eig

ht

hw

in m

m

0

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

Driver thickness tD

Skin depth σS

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

12D

rive

r

AL

CU

Charging Energy EC

1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 23: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

23 I 27

Results

100 mm

80 mm

65 mm

17 mm

t Dt W

hW

hw = Workpiece forming heighttw = Workpiece thicknesstD = Driver thickness

Workpiece:Material 1.4301

Thickness tW = 0.8 mm

Fo

rmin

g h

eig

ht

hw

in m

m

0

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

Driver thickness tD

Skin depth σS

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

12D

rive

r

AL

CU

Charging Energy EC

1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 24: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

24 I 27

Results

100 mm

80 mm

65 mm

17 mm

t Dt W

hW

hw = Workpiece forming heighttw = Workpiece thicknesstD = Driver thickness

Workpiece:Material 1.4301

Thickness tW = 0.8 mm

Fo

rmin

g h

eig

ht

hw

in m

m

0

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

Driver thickness tD

Skin depth σS

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

12D

rive

r

AL

CU

Charging Energy EC

1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ

Aluminium should be favoured as driver material

Optimum driver thickness tD,opt ≈ 1.1· σs – 1.2 σs

Effect of charging energy EC because of varying strain

In case of very small strains (e.g. calibration) copper should be favoured

Conclusions

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 25: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

25 I 27

Results

Comparision of optimum driver thicknesses tD,opt

(Driver material: AL)

Conclusions:Increasing workpiece thickness tW → Increasing optimum driver thickness tD,opt

Rule of thumb: Optimum driver thickness ≈ σs (AL)

Workpiece thickness tW

Workpiece material

0.5 mm 0.8 mm 1.0 mm

1.4301 0.95·σs 1.0·σs 1.27·σs

1.4509 1.0·σs 1.05·σs 1.29·σs

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 26: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

26 I 27

Introduction

Effect of driver sheets

State of the art

Experimental setup and procedure

Results

Summary and Outlook

Agenda

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 27: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

27 I 27

Summary and Outlook

Summary:

– Aluminum should be favoured as driver material

– Positive correlation between workpiece thickness tW and

optimum driver thickness tD,opt

– Rule of thumb: Optimum driver thickness ≈ σs (AL)

Outlook:

– EMF of stainless steel into a conical die using the optimum

driver material und thickness

– Analytical calculation of the optimum driver thickness tD,opt

Introduction Driver Sheets SotA Setup and Procedure Results Summary

Page 28: Gies - Presentation · 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 12 Driver AL CU Charging Energy EC 1.0 kJ 1.8 kJ 2.4 kJ Aluminium should be favoured as driver material Optimum driver thickness

28 I 27

Questions?