Upload
gomer
View
21
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Ghent University. Workshop Tempus Curricula Review 19-21 October 2005. AMEE A worldwide association for all interested in medical and health care professions education Amsterdam RAI 30 august – 2 september 2005. 2005 Conference themes Themes include: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Workshop Curricula review
Ghent University
Workshop Tempus
Curricula Review
19-21 October 2005
Workshop Curricula review
2005 Conference themes
Themes include: A: Curriculum and learning outcomes;
B: Teaching and learning; C: Assessment;
D: Educational management; E: Undergraduate/basic medical education;
F: Postgraduate/specialist training/continuing professional development;G: Multiprofessional education.
AMEEA worldwide association for all interested in medical
and health care professions education
Amsterdam RAI 30 august – 2 september 2005
Workshop Curricula review
Development and validation of a
prospective, random sample method for
measuring study-time and learning context in Medical Education
Design13 Relevance
Reliability2
Conclusion4
J Van der Vekenjos.vanderveken@ugent
Jos Van der Veken, MD, Research Associate, Directorate Educational Affairs, Centre Educational Quality Assurance
AMEE 2005
Amsterdam
Workshop Curricula review
Monitoring : study guide realistic ?
Evaluation new medical curriculum
Impact of educational Innovations
Impact of BaMa reform
Monitoring ECTS-contract
Why should we ?
How should we ?Prospective
Stratified random samples of students and weeks
AMEE 2005
Amsterdam
Workshop Curricula review
Bologna Action Lines 1-5
1: System of easily readable & comparable degrees2: System based on two cycles (now 3)3: Establishment of a system of credits4: Promotion of mobility5: Promotion of European cooperation in quality assurance
Ad 3 ECTS – method of describing time spent on a topic – so can compare curricula
Workshop Curricula review
Development and validation of a
prospective, random sample method for
measuring study-time and learning context in Medical Education
Design1 3 Relevance
Reliability2
Conclusion4
J Van der Vekenjos.vanderveken@ugent
AMEE 2005
Amsterdam
Jos Van der Veken, MD, Research Associate, Directorate Educational Affairs, Centre Educational Quality Assurance
Workshop Curricula review
DESIGN 4WS procedure
All students of a study year
10 research groups : at random
Proportional for gender / educational group
Each research group participates 4 weeks equally divided over academic year
2 ‘normal lesson’ - weeks
1 week : preparation of exams – 1 ‘exam’-week
Recall in case of non-response (proposing an alternative week)
AMEE 2005
Amsterdam
Workshop Curricula review
Maandag 27 november Dinsdag 28 november Woensdag 29 november
Gep
land
e activiteit wie
plaats
hu
lpm
idd
el
leeractivieit
blo
k / lijn / resp
on
s
Gep
land
e activiteit wie
plaats
hu
lpm
idd
el
leeractivieit
blo
k / lijn / resp
on
s
Gep
land
e activiteit wie
plaats
hu
lpm
idd
el
leeractivieit
blo
k / lijn / resp
on
s
0.00
0.30
1.00
1.30
2.00
2.30
3.00
3.30
4.00
4.30
5.00
5.30
6.00
6.30
7.00
7.30
8.00
8.30
9.00
9.30
10.00
10.30
AN
A
11.00
11.30
BM
C
12.00
12.30
13.00
13.30
14.00
14.30
15.00
ANA
15.30
16.00
16.30
17.00
TU
3
17.30
V-lijn
18.00
18.30
19.00
19.30
20.00
20.30
21.00
21.30
22.00
22.30
23.00
UW IDENTIFICATIE
Studielastmeting 2000-2001 2e Kan Arts Universiteit Gent
Kwaliteitscel Onderwijs Week 9 : 27 novemb – 29 novemb
CODE-TABEL
WIE ALL alleen COL met collega MER met meerdere collegae WI1-2 Andere (nr. zie preciseer) preciseer 1 : ………………………… preciseer 2 : …………………………
PLAATS BIB Bibliotheek PCZ PC-zaal KOT Thuis of op kot SKI Skill lab faculteit AD1-2 Andere (nr. zie preciseer) preciseer 1 ………………………….. preciseer 2 …………………………..
HULPMIDDELEN PC PC CUR Cursusmateriaal docent BOE Andere leerboeken CUB Cursusmateriaal + boek ART Wetenschappelijk artikel CD CD-rom INT Internet HU1-2 Andere hulpmiddel preciseer 1 : ………………………… preciseer 2 : …………………………
LEERACTIVITEIT VOO Voorbereiden college/pract VER Verwerken college/pract CUR Verwerken cursusmateriaal TOE Voorbereiden toets/examen LEC Lectuur OPD Opdracht verwerken docent OPZ Opzoeken in bibliotheek UIT Uitleg vragen LA1-2 Andere (nr. zie preciseer) preciseer 1 : ………………………… preciseer 2 : ………………………… BLOKdocent/LIJN/RESPONScolleg ANA Anatomie BMC Biomechanica EMB Embryologie HIS Histologie CVH C. Van Heeringen JDB J. De Bleecker JVK J. Vandekerckhove HT H. Thierens GV G. Vingerhoets KDH K. D'Herde KV K. Verstraete LC L. Crevits LDR L. De Ridder LL L. Leybaert ME M. Espeel PB P. Boon R1-15 Responscoll./nr zie wijzer P P-lijn TU1-5 Tutorial nr…. zie wijzer V V-lijn EOB E-lijn : observatie - context ESG E-lijn : Studium Generale Z Z-lijn CO1-2 Combinatie of andere preciseer 1 : ………………………… preciseer 2 : …………………………
23.30
Gelieve in elke vrij hokje de gepast code in te brengen. Bij de optie ‘andere’ dien je te preciseren in de code-tabel. In de kolom ‘Geplande Activiteit’ gelieve bij het bijwonen ervan het hokje aan te kruisen. Hier wordt geen code ingevuld.
Pla
nn
ed
a
citiv
Wh
o
Wh
ere
To
ol
Stu
dy
-ac
tivty
Su
bje
ct
The form
Workshop Curricula review
Development and validation of a
prospective, random sample method for
measuring study-time and learning context in Medical Education
Design1
3 Relevance
Reliability2
Conclusion4
J Van der Vekenjos.vanderveken@ugent
AMEE 2005
Amsterdam
Jos Van der Veken, MD, Research Associate, Directorate Educational Affairs, Centre Educational Quality Assurance
Workshop Curricula review
no difference between two registration periods of same curriculum year
MD1
1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003
MD1
MD2
MD3 MD3
MD 2
year 1
year 2
year 3
6 course units unchanged
63% of estimated study time
6 course units unchanged
65% of estimated study time
6 course units unchanged
67% of estimated study time
Reliability
AMEE 2005
Amsterdam
Workshop Curricula review
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
coh1
coh2
coh1 443 202 165 60 68 40 978 450 467 104 71 58 64 1214 133 433 143 301 77 27 1114
coh2 446 191 176 57 70 44 984 437 434 117 84 47 84 1203 149 451 168 275 76 32 1151
1 2 3 4 5 6 T 1 2 3 4 5 6 T 1 2 3 4 5 6 T
year 1 year 2 year 3
11 h
7 %
0.6%
33 h
7 %
26 h
9 %
0.9%
3.3%
Participation 1 : 95%
Participation 2 : 89%
Participation 1 : 80%
Participation 2 : 76%
Participation 1 : 64%
Participation 2 : 60%
200
400
600
800
h
coh1
coh2
Year-totals and course unit-totals = nearly equal
Workshop Curricula review
Development and validation of a
prospective, random sample method for
measuring study-time and learning context in Medical Education
Design1
3 Relevance
Reliability2
Conclusion4
J Van der Vekenjos.vanderveken@ugent
AMEE 2005
Amsterdam
Jos Van der Veken, MD, Research Associate, Directorate Educational Affairs, Centre Educational Quality Assurance
Workshop Curricula review
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39
STUDENT
STUDENT
Num
ber
of s
tude
nts
week
MD year 2 – 2001-2002
participation selected students
AMEE 2005
Amsterdam
example 1
Workshop Curricula review
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
ZELF
LES
ZELF 10 12 20 19 26 23 42 41 29 27 25 32 64 52 67 58 71 43 3 8 6 12 20 24 21 18 32 42 19 16 37 39 37 58 62 76 76 72 43
LES 17 22 19 23 13 19 11 13 19 19 22 17 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 41 40 19 20 19 14 11 0 0 15 23 11 16 16 6 0 0 0 0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
Num
ber
of h
ours
/ w
e ek
weeknumber
planned
self-study
sem 1 sem 2
example 2 MD year 2 – 2001-2002
timing study-activities
Workshop Curricula review
ParticipationPlanned activities
Selfstudy TotalStudy time
Studyguide
Difference
Course unit 1 77 229 306 300 + 2 %
Course unit 2 66 105 171 150 + 14 %
Course unit 3 91 209 299 320 - 7 %
Course unit 4 24 59 82 105 - 22 %
Course unit 5 9 58 67 90 - 26 %
Course unit 6 20 64 84 75 + 12 %
Course unit 7 21 133 154 150 + 3 %
Course unit 8 57 313 370 210 + 76 %
Course unit 9 68 248 316 300 + 5 %
Non specified 1 3 4 -
Total 433 1420 1853 1700 + 9 %
example 3
Workshop Curricula review
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
Zenuwstelsel en zintuigen - 2001-2002
ZELF
LES
ZELF 0.0 2.8 3.3 3.2 1.9 3.5 7.6 22.1 19.8 22.9 21.2 20.2 1.4 2.4 6.1 34.9 70.6 42.7
LES 1.0 2.7 6.3 8.1 2.5 4.3 4.0 11.5 16.7 19.1 15.3 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
course unit 1
AMEE 2005
Amsterdam
example 4
Workshop Curricula review
MD year 2 – 2001-2002Learning activities
% of total of hours of selfstudy
example 5
Workshop Curricula review
processing
Preparation evaluation
preparation
tasks
unit 1
unit 2
unit 3
unit 4
unit 5
unit 6
unit 7
unit 8
% of total of hours of selfstudy excl. examination period
example 6
Workshop Curricula review
year 1
Evolution of learning tools
year 2
year 3 year 4
42 h
45 h 27 h
% of total of hours of selfstudy
38 h
example 7
Workshop Curricula review
Evolution of study place
98 %
2% 1%
Year 1
98 %
1% 2%
94 %
0,3% 5%
Year 2
Year 3 Year 4
17 h 20 h
17 h 4 h
% of total of hours of selfstudy
example 8
Workshop Curricula review % of total of hours of selfstudy
Educational Sciences 1
Clinical psychology 3Medicine
Learning partners in different curricula
Educational Sciences 3
example 9
Workshop Curricula review
Development and validation of a
prospective, random sample method for
measuring study-time and learning context in Medical Education
Design1
3 Relevance
Reliability 2
Conclusion4
J Van der Vekenjos.vanderveken@ugent
AMEE 2005
Amsterdam
Jos Van der Veken, MD, Research Associate, Directorate Educational Affairs, Centre Educational Quality Assurance
Workshop Curricula review
Conclusion
strong design
feasible for students
high participation
stable measurements
reliable results
Huge quantity of information about study time and learning context
Ideal instrument for follow-up educational interventions and monitoring study process in higher education
(and why not in secondary schools ?)
AMEE 2005
Amsterdam