Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
9/12/2016
1
©2016 Foley & Lardner LLP • Attorney Advertising • Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome • Models used are not clients but may be representative of clients • 321 N. Clark Street, Suite 2800, Chicago, IL 60654 • 312.832.4500
Friday, September 9, 2016
Get Ready for the Comprehensive Joint Replacement Program – The Time is Now
©2016 Foley & Lardner LLP
Presenters
1
Frederick Geilfuss II
Partner
Foley & Lardner LLP
Christopher Donovan
Partner
Foley & Lardner LLP
Dave Terry
CEO & Founder
Archway Health
9/12/2016
2
©2016 Foley & Lardner LLP
General Overview
■ Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (“CCJR”) Model
■ Acute care hospitals in certain selected geographic areas will be responsible for the costs of episodes of care for lower extremity joint replacement or reattachment of a lower extremity (and, as proposed, surgical hip/femur fracture)
■ Episode covers all Medicare Part A and Part B payments from hospitalization through 90 days post-discharge
■ Mandatory participation of roughly 800 hospitals in 67 MSAs
■ Program began April 1, 2016
■ Downside risk starts January 1, 2017
■ 5 year program
2
©2016 Foley & Lardner LLP
Reconciliation Payment Model
■ Retrospective, two-sided risk model with hospitals bearing financial responsibility
− Providers and suppliers continue to be paid via Medicare FFS
− At the end of the performance year, actual episode spending will be compared to the episode target price
− Generally, anchor hospital receives benefit if costs below target or bears risk if costs exceed target
■ If costs below target, reconciliation payments will be phased in and capped (stop-gain):
− Years 1 and 2: Capped at 5%
− Year 3: Capped at 10%
− Years 4-5: Capped at 20%
■ If costs above target, hospital responsibility to repay CMS will be phased in and capped (stop-loss):
− Year 1 (2016): No responsibility to repay Medicare
− Year 2: Capped at 5% of target prices
− Year 3: Capped at 10% of target prices
− Years 4 and 5: Capped at 20% of target prices
3
9/12/2016
3
©2016 Foley & Lardner LLP
Establishing Target Prices
■ Each participant hospital will have its own episode target prices set by CMS based on 3 years of historical data
■ Target based on a blend of hospital-specific and regional costs: − Years 1 and 2: 2/3 hospital-specific costs and 1/3
regional
− Year 3: 1/3 hospital-specific costs and 2/3 regional
− Years 4 and 5: 100% regional costs
■ 3% discount to serve as Medicare’s savings; quality impact
4
©2016 Foley & Lardner LLP
Overview
■ Hospital at core
■ Hospital may share upside and downside, but requires a detailed contract with collaborators (providers furnishing services as part of the episode)
■ Contract requirements are detailed
■ Hospital must keep 50% of downside; no one but collaborator can be responsible for more than 25%
■ Physician upside limited to 50% of the total Medicare-approved amounts under the physician fee schedule
5
9/12/2016
4
©2016 Foley & Lardner LLP
Overview (cont’d.)
■ Program Waivers − Waives requirement for 3-day inpatient stay
before SNF admission (if SNF has 3-star rating)
− For post-discharge home visits, waives incident to direct supervision for physician services Maximum of nine visits during episode
− Telehealth -- waives geographic site requirement
− Preferred providers in discharge planning Easing of requirements?
6
©2016 Foley & Lardner LLP
Sharing Agreements
■ Hospitals may negotiate agreements for sharing gain and loss that they bear
■ Opportunities lie in aligning other providers for furnishing efficient services
■ Analyze cost of care furnished and by whom in an episode
■ DRG for hospital; opportunity for physician gainsharing
■ Post-acute care services − Reduce hospital readmissions
− More home care
7
9/12/2016
5
©2016 Foley & Lardner LLP
Requirements for Sharing Agreements
■ Detailed written agreement
■ Hospital must develop a written set of policies for selecting providers/suppliers, which include quality criteria
■ Criteria for sharing must be based on quality, not volume or value
■ For PGPs, PGP must contribute to care redesign and be clinically involved in CJR beneficiaries’ care (e.g., care coordination, design of care)
■ Agreement must tie provider compliance plan to CJR
8
©2016 Foley & Lardner LLP
CJR: Fraud and Abuse Waivers
Three Fraud and Abuse Waivers:
1. Waiver for Distribution of Gainsharing Payments and Payment for Alignment Payments Under Sharing Arrangement (“Gainsharing and Alignment Payment Waiver”)
2. Waiver for Distribution Payments from a Physician Group Practice to a Practice Collaboration Agent (“PGP to Collaboration Agent Waiver”)
3. Waiver for Patient Engagement Incentives Provided by Participant Hospitals to Medicare Beneficiaries in Episodes (“Patient Engagement Waivers”)
9
9/12/2016
6
CJR Program Management
Preparation, Design & Implementation
September 9, 2016
www.archwayhealth.com 10
www.archwayhealth.com
Contents
• About Archway Health
• Bundled Payment Market Update
• CJR Program Management • Phase I: CJR Diagnostics & Opportunity Assessment
• Phase II: Program Design
• Phase III: Implementation
• Getting Started
11
9/12/2016
7
www.archwayhealth.com
About Archway Health
100% Focused on Bundled Payment – it’s all we do
Active in all of the CMS bundled payment programs – BPCI, CJR, OCM, EPM Also developing commercial bundle
Have built a comprehensive, one stop shop bundled payment platform
Working with dozens of customers & hundreds of providers across the country
Real results – all of our partner hospitals & physicians are earning significant savings
The Archway team has been working in these programs since their inception in 2011
Focus To partner with providers &
payors to execute bundle payment programs
Mission To fix healthcare through
payment reform
12
www.archwayhealth.com
Archway’s comprehensive, straightforward approach has helped provider organizations achieve significant savings in their BPCI orthopedic bundles.
$2,000 – $4,700
savings/ bundled patient
• Increased patient
satisfaction
• 85%+ provider
compliance with INACT
process
• Reduced readmissions
• Reduced post-acute
facility costs
• 9-17% reconciliation
savings
$31,000
$26,300
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
Baseline PerformancePrices
Performance PeriodCost
About Archway Health - Results to Date
Archway’s Bundled Payment Performance
13
9/12/2016
8
www.archwayhealth.com
We’ve learned that there are four elements to the most effective bundled payment programs.
Bundled Payment Pyramid
About Archway – Program Design
• Basic requirement
• Creates new incentives
for accountability &
improvement Bundled Payment Contract
• Identify opportunities & risks
• Prioritize areas for
improvement Data Analytics
• Leverage existing protocols &
guidelines
• Case manager engagement
• Driven by nurses & hospitalists
Care
Management
• New & better ways to care for acute & chronic
patients
• Optimal provider, patient, payor alignment
• Driven by hospital – specialist alignment
• Biggest driver of improvement
Inno-
vation
14
www.archwayhealth.com
Bundle Payment Initiatives Participants Estimated Market Size*
BPCI - Bundled Payment for
Care Improvement
• 1,457 providers • $10 Billion
CJR - Comprehensive Care for
Joint Replacement
• 767 Hospitals • $4 Billion
OCM - Oncology Care Model • 196 Oncology Groups
• 17 Health Plans
• $2 Billion
Episode Payment Model - EPM • 1,200 hospitals
• 2 cardiac & 1 new ortho bundle
• $6 Billion
• Starts 7/1/17
BPCI 2.0 • Voluntary
• Focus on physician driven bundles
• Size TBD
• Starts early 2018
Commercial • @ 40 active programs
• Lots of activity in the last 6 months
Total • 3,620 • $25+ Billion
* Estimated based on publicly available information
Bundled Payment Market
Bundled Payment Market Size
Bundle payment is shifting from a niche payment model to an emerging strategic priority.
15
9/12/2016
9
www.archwayhealth.com
Archway CJR Approach
Phase I: Program
Preparation
Phase II: Program Design
Phase III: Program
Implementation
• Pricing analysis by bundle
type
• Opportunity benchmarking
• Detailed Surgeon analysis
• Post-acute provider
analysis
• Quality performance
analysis
• Designate & train CJR
Oversight Team
• Develop work plan & timeline
for focus areas
• Execute surgeon gainsharing
strategy
• Formalize preferred provider
network
• Quality improvement plan
• Identify & track CJR patients
• Implement care management
approach
• Collect & track quality metrics
• Track quality & financial
performance
• Monitor preferred providers
• CMS program compliance
• Ongoing learning &
improvement
Main Objective: Identify
priority areas of focus
Main Objective: Finalize CJR
strategy and operational plan
Main Objective: Improve
quality & reduce costs
CJR Program Preparation, Design & Implementation Process
Archway has developed a comprehensive process for helping hospitals succeed within the CJR program.
16
www.archwayhealth.com
The first step is to episodic spending by type of service - outpatient, home health, SNF, etc.
Demo Data
Archway CJR Approach: Phase I Phase I: Program
Preparation
17
9/12/2016
10
www.archwayhealth.com
Best practice benchmarking is an important step that helps CJR hospitals understand their opportunities and risks within their organization and market.
Opportunity Assessment Controllable Cost Benchmarking
Elective DRG 470
Archway CJR Approach: Phase I Phase I: Program
Preparation
Illustrative
18
www.archwayhealth.com
$45,461
$44,008
$29,003
$26,699
$26,133
$25,590
$24,301
$23,767
$23,716
$23,632
$22,897
$22,658
$21,601
$- $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000
(19) D
(17) E
(129) F
(40) G
(37) H
(21) I
(31) J
(90) K
(43) L
(259) M
(121) N
(345) O
(120) P
Anchor Stay SNF HHA Readmits IRF Other
Physician
(volume)
Estimated Elective 470 Price
Archway CJR Approach: Phase I Phase I: Program
Preparation
Understanding historical episodic costs by surgeon is essential to developing a CJR strategy and defining short term priorities.
Major Joint Surgeon Cost Performance Profile Elective DRG 470
Illustrative
19
9/12/2016
11
www.archwayhealth.com
Archway CJR Approach: Phase I Phase I: Program
Preparation
There is also significant variation in the episodic cost of care by Skilled Nursing provider.
Episodic Cost of Care by Skilled Nursing Facility
20
www.archwayhealth.com
SNF Medicare Compare Ratings
Archway CJR Approach: Phase I Phase I: Program
Preparation
It is also important to work with high quality post-acute providers.
Quality Staffing Survey Overall
SNF A ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
SNF B ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
SNF C ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
SNF D ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
SNF E ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
SNF F ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
SNF G ★ ★ ★ ★
21
Illustrative
9/12/2016
12
www.archwayhealth.com
CJR pricing is adjusted based on each hospital’s performance within a Composite Quality Score that includes complication rates, HCHAPS scores, and patient reported outcomes (PRO) submission.
Archway CJR Approach: Phase I
CJR Quality Metrics Calculations
Hospital Campus
RSCR Score (4/1/11-3/31/14)
Percentile Rank
Points Assigned
HCAHPS Star Rating (7/1/14-6/30/15)
Percentile Rank of HLMR*
Points Assigned
Patient Reported Outcome Reporting
Composite Quality Score
Effective Discount Percentage for Year 1
Brookline 2.4 94 10 3 57 5.6 2.0 17.6 1.5%
Cole Valley 3.2 48 6.25 4 64 6.2 0.0 12.5 2.0% *HCAHPS Linear Mean Roll-up score (HLMR) was derived from publicly available Hospital Compare data using CJR final rule formula.
Phase I: Program
Preparation
22
Illustrative
www.archwayhealth.com
Archway CJR Approach: Phase II
Phase I: Program
Preparation
Phase II: Program Design
Phase III: Program
Implementation
• Pricing analysis by bundle
type
• Opportunity benchmarking
• Detailed Surgeon analysis
• Post-acute provider
analysis
• Quality performance
analysis
• Designate & train CJR
Oversight Team
• Develop work plan & timeline
for focus areas
• Execute surgeon gainsharing
strategy
• Formalize preferred provider
network
• Quality improvement plan
• Identify & track CJR patients
• Implement care management
approach
• Collect & track quality metrics
• Track quality & financial
performance
• Monitor preferred providers
• CMS program compliance
• Ongoing learning &
improvement
Main Objective: Identify
priority areas of focus
Main Objective: Finalize CJR
strategy and operational plan
Main Objective: Improve
quality & reduce costs
CJR Program Preparation, Design & Implementation Process
Archway has developed a comprehensive process for helping hospitals succeed within the CJR program.
Phase II:
Program Design
23
9/12/2016
13
www.archwayhealth.com
• One team is better than many
• Designate an empowered Project Leader with “Oomph”
• The Care Management Team can make a huge difference
• Physician gainsharing helps too
• Keep it simple
• “Crawl, walk, run”
• Track program performance frequently
• Care management
• Financial
• Build continuum partnerships, but don’t get locked in
• “Trust but verify”
• Switch when necessary
• Joint Class leaders
• Care Management leader
• Discharge planning
• Surgeon champion
• Finance
• C-Suite representation
Recommended Team Principles
Key Team Members
Phase II:
Program Design Archway CJR Approach: Phase II
CJR Focused Team
Designating a single, focused and manageable CJR implementation team is key to effective program design and success.
24
www.archwayhealth.com
Archway CJR Approach: Phase II
Gainsharing Rules & Principles
Gainsharing is important tool for aligning incentives and improving performance.
• Strive to keep the structure simple &
objective
• Focus on high volume, high influence
providers
• Use gainsharing to align incentives &
drive performance
• Gainsharing with SNFs creates unique
risk protection within CJR
• Physician gainsharers limited to 50% of
Part B collections in CJR
• CJR Hospitals should only distribute
gains if there are net gains for the
overall program
Gainsharing Agreements
Phase II:
Program Design
25
9/12/2016
14
www.archwayhealth.com
Preferred Provider Network Development
• Daily health status updates
• BPCI participation strongly preferred
• Focus on quality improvement
• Commitment to reduce LOS & Readmits
• Designated CJR point person
• Data sharing
• Continuous learning & improvement
• Regular care management meetings
Preferred Provider
Expectations
We have developed a simple, data-driven process to develop a preferred provider network.
Phase II:
Program Design Archway CJR Approach: Phase II
Facility Episode Volume
LOS Score Episode
Cost Score Overall
Star Rating Collaboration
Total Score
OAK STREET REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER
140 3.00 4.00 5 5 5
MAIN STREET REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER
112 1.00 2.00 5 5 5
MOUNTAIN VIEW REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER 135 2.00 4.00 3 3 3
FOREST VIEW REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER
147 1.00 2.00 4 3 3
ELM STREET REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER
150 5.00 1.00 3 2 3
CITY VIEW REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER
137 1.00 1.00 4 2 2
LAKE VIEW REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER
120 1.00 1.00 2 2 1
OCEAN VIEW REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER
123 1.00 1.00 3 1 1
Sample Skilled Nursing Facility Analysis
90 Day Hospital-Initiated Bundles from 1/1/14-12/31/14
26
www.archwayhealth.com
Archway CJR Approach: Phase II
Detailed CJR Program Workplan
Phase II:
Program Design
At the end of Phase II we generally develop a detailed workplan designed to accomplish the goals outlined in the Design Phase.
27
9/12/2016
15
www.archwayhealth.com
Archway CJR Approach
Phase I: Program
Preparation
Phase II: Program Design
Phase III: Program
Implementation
• Pricing analysis by bundle
type
• Opportunity benchmarking
• Detailed Surgeon analysis
• Post-acute provider
analysis
• Quality performance
analysis
• Designate & train CJR
Oversight Team
• Develop work plan & timeline
for focus areas
• Execute surgeon gainsharing
strategy
• Formalize preferred provider
network
• Quality improvement plan
• Identify & track CJR patients
• Implement care management
approach
• Collect & track quality metrics
• Track quality & financial
performance
• Monitor preferred providers
• CMS program compliance
• Ongoing learning &
improvement
Main Objective: Identify
priority areas of focus
Main Objective: Finalize CJR
strategy and operational plan
Main Objective: Improve
quality & reduce costs
CJR Program Preparation, Design & Implementation Process
Archway has developed a comprehensive process for helping hospitals succeed within the CJR program.
Phase III: Program
Implementation
28
www.archwayhealth.com
CJR Care Model Design INACT Process
Steps Description
1. Identify Identify patients in bundled payment
programs
2. Notify Notify patients they are enrolled in a bundled
payment program
3. Assess Assess patients to determine if they are Low,
Medium or High risk for complications
4. Care Plan Develop a 90 day care plan that maps out key
transition steps across the episode
5. Track Track patient progress as they transition from
hospital to home
Archway has collaborated with participating providers to develop a simple bundled payment care management model that is working well in the market.
Archway CJR Approach: Phase III Phase III: Program
Implementation
29
9/12/2016
16
Real Time Patient Tracking
Archway Carelink Dashboard
30
www.archwayhealth.com
Archway Analytics Web-Enabled Dashboard
Costs by DRG & Type
Archway CJR Approach: Phase III
31
9/12/2016
17
www.archwayhealth.com
Archway Analytics Web-Enabled Dashboard
Physician Reporting
Archway CJR Approach: Phase III
32
www.archwayhealth.com
Getting Started
CJR Program Priorities
To get started we recommend initiating the Phase I program preparation analytics.
• Identify your hospital’s current phase – Prep, Design Implementation
• Designate CJR Team • Identify 2-3 initial CJR priorities • Surgeon Gainsharing • Preferred Provider Network Development • Patient Tracking • Performance Tracking
33
9/12/2016
18
©2016 Foley & Lardner LLP • Attorney Advertising • Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome • Models used are not clients but may be representative of clients • 321 N. Clark Street, Suite 2800, Chicago, IL 60654 • 312.832.4500 34
Questions & Answers