52E18NW9492 2.5474 ECHO BAY010

GEOPHYSICAL REPORT

ELECTROMAGNETIC ft MAGNETIC SURVEYS

SHOAL LAKE PROJECT - ONTARIO

GRIDS 5A, 5B, 6E S 7C

RECEIVEDl 5 1983

MINING LANDS SECTION

A.P. Pryslak April, 1983

A. Introduction

This report deals with results of geophysical surveys conducted over 4 grids situated in the Shoal Lake area of Northwestern Ontario. Two grids are situated in Glass Township, north of Clytie Bay of Shoal Lake. These surveys are part of a follow-up program to an INPUT survey completed by Questor Surveys Limited in the fall of 1981 and are base-metal targets. Grids 6E and 7C are part of a regional exploration program for Cameron Island type gold mineralization.

Access to the properties situated around Shoal Lake is via the Rush Bay Road which connects Clytie Bay of Shoal Lake with the Trans-Canada Highway.

B. Regional Geology

The metavolcanic-metasedimentary sequence forms part of the Wabigoon Subprovince, Superior Province of Archean Age. The O.G.S. Compilation Map 2443 - Kenora - Fort Frances Sheet illustrates the major lithological units for the Shoal Lake area. Detailed geological mapping by Davies gives further information on the geology of the Shoal Lake area.

C. Linecutting

Grids were established over the target areas in January and February, 1983. Lines were spaced at 400-foot intervals and stations were picketed at 100-foot intervals along the lines.

D. Geophysical Surveys

All grids were surveyed using Apex Parametrics Max-Min II units at a frequency of 444 Hz with 400-foot coil separation. Readings were taken at 100-foot station intervals, except in areas of anomalous readings where this was reduced to 50-foot intervals.

21...

- 2 -

The magnetic survey utilized the Geometrics G-816 unit, serial No.450. Again, readings were at 100-foot intervals, except for areas of anomalous activity where it was reduced to 50-foot stations. All grids were surveyed by the magnetometer.

The VLF-EM survey was carried out over grid 7C. The instrument used for the survey was a Geonics EM 16 unit utilizing the Culter, Maine station.

E. Property 5 - Grid A

(i) Geology - Davies 1 mapping shows that the grid area is

underlain by a sequence of felsic and mafic metavolcanics intruded by minor gabbro sills.

(ii) H.L.E.M. Survey Results - A strong long-trending conductor lies to the north of the Base Line between lines 12+OOE and 48+OOE. The central and east portions of this feature display widths of 75 to 175 feet or it may also be interpreted as two separate but narrow conductors. The conductors are correlative with a weak positive magnetic anomaly. The amplitude of the magnetic response varies from several tens of gammas to approximately 600 gammas on line 20+OOE. This conductor was tested by Selco a number of years ago and was identified as graphic tuff-sediments with minor pyrrhotite, pyrite and sphalerite.

Two short conductors lie approximately 1000-feet to the north of the long conductor. The conductivity is variable along the strike length of both features. The most easterly conductor, which lie south of a small lake, is correlative with a weak magnetic anomaly in the magnetude of 200 gammas. This conductor would appear to lie along the contact of felsic pyroclastics and mafic metavolcanic flows.

- 3 -

The easterly conductor has no apparent correlation with anomalous magnetic responses and is likely due to graphitic tuffs or sediments.

(iii) Magnetometer Survey Results - A narrow positive magnetic anomaly extends from co-ordinate 14N - 40E to 12N - 52E. Elsewhere, the magnetic susceptabilities are low and subtely reflect the trend of lithological units. Several isolated high peaks may reflect errors in reading.

(iv) Recommendations - Minor base-metal mineralization is known to occur in the area just outside the grid. Davies' mapping shows that outcrops over the grid area are abundant. Therefore, it is recommended that the grid be mapped and that particular attention be paid to locating the source of the conductors. Testing of conductors by diamond drilling would be dependant upon results of these geological investigations.

F. Property 5 - Grid B

(i) Geology - Davies 1 mapping shows that the north part of the grid is underlain by felsic pyroclastics and that the south part is comprised of mafic metavolcanic flows.

(ii) H.L.E.M. Survey Results - Two conductors have been identified by the survey. The conductivity of both features varies from weak to moderate along the strike. The north conductor is strongest at the west while the south conductor has its strongest response at the east end.

Both conductors have moderate magnetic signature but this is also variable along the strike of the conductors.

. 4 -

(ill) Magnetometer Survey Results - Moderate positive magnetic anomalies are elongated in an east-west direction and display stratigraphic trends. The variation in magnetic response within the mafic volcanic sequence probably is due to minor differences in flow units.

(iv) Recommendations - The conductors should be prospected during the summer months to find their possible source. If these are not located, testing by diamond drilling is recommended.

G. Property 6 - Grid E

(i) Geology - Davies 1 mapping shows this area to be underlain by the lower tholeiitic volcanic sequence. The south part of the grid is occupied by rocks of the upper calc-alkaline felsic volcanics, with the contact being under the lake and approximately parallel to the shore in the west part of the grid. The southeast part of the grid is underlain by intrusive rocks of the Canoe Lake Stock.

(ii) H.L.E.M. Survey Results - A total of six conductors were identified by the survey and 3 were subsequently tested by diamond drilling. All conductors are comprised of chert- pyrrhotite units intraformational to mafic volcanic flows. Conductor No.l - Co-ordinate 14N, 4+OOE to 12N, 20+OOE.

Weak to moderate conductor with a weak flanking magnetic anomaly. Tested by diamond drilling on L8E, 12N.

Conductor No.2 - Co-ordinate 2N, 4+OOE to IN, 28+OOE.

A strong magnetic response flanks the conductor to the south. This is correlative with a mafic- ultramafic flow versus more normal basalts situated north of the conductor which have a low magnetic signature.

- 5 -

Conductor No.4 - Co-ordinate 7N, 48+OOE, to ION, 68+OOE. This conductor was tested by diamond drilling on L52E and is due to chert-pyrrhotite.

Conductor No.5 - Co-ordinate 85, 60+OOE.This strong, single line feature is situated near the contact of the volcanics and the Canoe Lake Stock. It was tested by diamond drilling and is due to an intraformational unit of chert-pyrrhotite.

Conductor No.6 - Co-ordinate 2S, 0+00.This weak conductor with high quadrature response is likely due to minor chert-sulphide bands associated with the transition zone between the

tholeiitic volcanics and the calc-alkaline volcanics. This transition zone was tested by drilling on line 8+OOE and intersected such mineral ization.

(iii) Magnetometer Survey Results - Positive magnetic features are

related either to chert-pyrrhotite zones or magnetite-bearing ultramafic units. The areas of magnetic response are occupied either by normal basalt flows in the north part of the grid or by the calc-alkaline sequence in the south part.

(iv) Recommendations - Conductor No.2 is situated in an area of topographic high and is likely to be exposed in outcrop. This should be checked and sampled for gold mineralization.

H. Property 7 - Grid C

(i) Geology - This grid lies east of Clytie Bay and north of Bag Bay of Shoal Lake. Davies 1 mapping shows that the east end of the grid is underlain by intrusive rocks of the Canoe Lake Stock. Mafic volcanics, gabbro and ultramafic rocks

occupy the central part of the grid and felsic pyroclastics are exposed along the protrusion of the shoreline. , ,

- 6 -

The above volcanic sequence is interpreted to be stratigraphically equivalent to the sequence in the vicinity of Cameron Island.

The Crown Point mine is located within the Canoe Lake granodiorite. Gold mineralization here is associated with quartz veins. :

In 1968, Olympia Mines carried out diamond drilling on a sulphide zone situated east of the base line in the central part of the property.

(ii) H.L.E.M. Survey Results - Three strong bedrock conductors have been identified by this survey. These fall within the mafic- ultramafic volcanic sequence. Drilling by Olympia Mines identified one of the conductors as due to chert-pyrrhotite with minor nickel and copper values. It is uncertain if the drilling tested only one or both of the two parallel conductors situated east of the base line. The third conductor, lying between the base line and the shore line is likely similar in nature to that encountered by the drilling.

A weak conductor situated at the east end of the grid between lines 261N and 269N appears to conform with the contact of the volcanic sequence and the Canoe Lake Stock.

A weak, single line response occurs at co-ordinate 65E, 245N. The quadrature response is greater than the in-phase, suggesting a lake bottom sediment response.

(iii) Magnetometer Survey Results - A zone of positive magnetic response, approximately 600-feet wide, extends from the area north of the base line on 237+OON to the area south of the base line on 281+OON. This magnetic feature identifies a sequence of ultramafic flows and pyrrhotite-bearing cherts and basalts.

- 7 -

The area of Tow magnetic response along the west portion of the grid correlates with felsic metavolcanics and the low magnetic response to the east of the positive magnetic anomaly correlates with the granodiorite of the Canoe Lake Stock.

(iv) VLF-EM Survey Results - Numerous conductors have been identified by this survey. The VLF survey shows that the two HLEM conductors situated east of the base line are in fact separate conductors and not a single broad feature. Some of the features coincide with shore line or areas of topographic lows. Geological mapping is required to see if some of the features are due to structures within the bedrock.

(v) Recommendations - Geological mapping is recommended prior to any testing for gold mineralization by diamond drilling.

S2E18NW9492 2.5474 ECHO BAY 900

1983 10 052.5474

Mr. Wade MathewMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources808 Robertson StreetBox 5160Kenora, OntarioP9N 3X9

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey on mining claims K 533164 et al 1n the Areas of Shoal Lake, Echo Bay and Boys Township.

The Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) survey assessment work credits as listed with my Notice of Intent dated September 7, 1983 have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6610 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-1380

D. K1nv1g:mc

Encl.

cc: Selco Ine55 University AvenueSuite 1700Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7

cc: T. Pryslak534 Berry StreetWinnipeg, Manitoba R3H OR9

cc: Resident Geologist Kenora, Ontario

/rr\ Ministry of Technical Assess Ivy] Natural VyJ Resources Work CreditsOntario ^^

mCnt . J" f 2.5474

[Date Mining Recorder's Report off 1983 09 06 work NO. 29-83

Recorded Holder

SELCO INCTownship or Area

ECHO BAY AND BOYS TOWNSHIPS

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Electromagnetic days

40 Magnetometer days

Induced polarization days

Section 7 7 ( 19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

fipnlngir.al days

Geochemical . days

Man days D Airborne CD

Special provision H Ground f*l

FX! Credits have been reduced because of partial

coverage of claims.

l l Credits have been reduced because of corrections

to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

K 564171 to 76 inclusive 564178 589131 to 33 inclusive 589145 to 47 inclusive 589152 to 54 inclusive 589161 590008-09

Special credits under section 77 ( 16) for the following mining claims

20 DAYS MAGNETOMETER

K 564170 590010

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

1 _ l not sufficiently covered by the survey 1 _ 1 Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77(19) 60:

828 (83/6)

/1.ZN f/mistryof Technical Assess IVy] Natural vyv Resources Work CreditsOntario ^^

ment F" e 2.5474

Date Mining Recorder's Report of1983 09 06 workfjo. 29-83

Recorded HolderSELCO INC

Township or AreaECHO BAY AND BOYS TOWNSHIPS

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical 20

MflgnetnmRtnr days

Induced polarization days

Other days

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological . days

Genr.hpmioal days

Man days C3 Airborne f~l

Special provision Lx Ground 03

L~3 Credits have been reduced because of partial

coverage of claims.

d Credits have been reduced because of corrections

to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

K 564171 to 76 inclusive 564178 589131 to 33 inclusive 589145 to 47 inclusive 589152 589154 589161 590008-9

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

10 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC

K 564170 589153 590010

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey 1 1 Insufficient technical data filed

*

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77(19) 60:

828 (83/6)

Ministry ofNaturalResources

ario

1983 09 07

Your file: 29-83

Our file: 2.5474

Mr. Wade MathewMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources808 Robertson StreetBox 5160Kenora, OntarioP9N 3X9

Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements

listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed

for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded

holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately

fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of

these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval

letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record

sheets.

For further information, if required, please contact

Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Yours very truly,

/Anderson r*ector

Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

D. Kinvig:mc

Ends:

cc: Selco Inc55 Univeristy Avenue Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining X Lands Commissioner

845 Toronto, Ontario

cc: T. Pryslak534 Berry Street Winnipeg, Manitoba R3H OR9

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1983 09 06

2.5474/29-83

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 (82/5)

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

SHOAL - P6

ftrThe Mining Act

Instructions: Please type or print. If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survfly(i)

GeophysicalClaim Holder(t)

Selco Inc.Address

55 University Ave., SuiteSurvey Company

Selco Inc.Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

T. Pryslak - 534 Berry St.,

] Township or Area

Shoal Lake M2339Prospector's Licence No.

T190

1700, Toronto. Ontario M5J 2H7l Date of Survey (from Si t o) Total Miles of line Cut

17, 01, 83 08 02 83 i c m 1- lp ,| Day | Mo. | Yr. Day 1 Mo. j Yr. ^ "l" 1 6S

Winnipeg, Manitoba R3H OR9Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

20

40

Days per Claim

Days perClaim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calc ulatton of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S * 15

C

~

Total )ays Credits

Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

,Dat

ftfc. 17-8-^52^Ptjterj^TV-

ITAgent (Signature! ,(J

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

K 564170

564171

564172

564173

564174

564175

564176

: 564178

590008

. 590009

590110

1

f

Expend. Days Cr.

i

' J

For Office Use Only*~Dtai Uays Cr. Date Recorded . Recorded ^\ 1 /A **

VS^.^I/D^^it f ffi OTTnSpproveoT^WBLuiU**

^

Mining ClaimPfflix. | Number

R crcM/t

fM1NIN

[CSIraAM

Ji8

rIAK i y 1983

^ K*-L/ f j'

*

r t/1" /I J\^yw

KENOR MiNlNG OlV

1 IK lin jjl II Vi/*-* W la U \i

Q 2 1 li

^^^^^^^^^^**Mi^a^ha^

Expend. Days Cr.

L0-' Iff

rrzr-

A

p n^ ia M ||

83 pwiji&giS]

Total number of mining claims covered by this J J report of work.

Mmjta^^c^ber f ^

Sgi^ScTO-i^ __ Tvl^ft^JJVf **p -....^^^^^^1^^

Certification Verifying Report of Work "y~ l i '

t hereby certify that 1 have a personal or witnessed same during and/or after

end intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Addrest of Pereon Certifying

A. Pryslak - 534 Berry St., Winnipeg, Manitoba R3H OR9 J ^^lfflfl.Date Certified

Feb. 10, 1983Certified bvXSigWtu/e) " M

1362 (81/9)

Ministryof Report of Work

Re'so'urces (Geophysical, Geological, QntarjO Geochemical and Expenditures)

9 S hoal - P5 Grid 'A' The Mining ActType of Survey(s)

GeophysicalClaim Holder(s)

Selco Inc.

Instructions: Please type or print. ^ f P ^ — I f number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

^ Do not use shaded areas below.Township or Area

M1949Prospector's Licence No.

T190Address

55 University Ave., Suite 1700 , Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7Survey Company Date of Sur

Selco Inc. .Day | Mo

vey (from 81 to) Total Miles of line CutFeb. '83 Q c m lc

1 Yr. Day | Mo. | Yr. S . 0 m 1 S .Neme and Addrest of Author (of Geo Technical report) --

T. Pryslak - 534 Berry Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3H OR9

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions

credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

20

40

Days perClaim

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

SInstructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns et right.

Date nt(Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix

K

Number

589131

589132

589133

589145 '

589146

589147

589152

589153

589154

589161

,C, -ff ,

\*;

4

Expend. Days Cr.

(—— *7*

P^

. s:WA *

^

5797 A 7

\j

y

Mining ClaimPrefix | Number

|

AMImil

AM7i8i9

Expend. Days Cr.

EECElViP^t-K 1 5 19

UNO LANDS

KENORAMINING DIV.

i y b n/ EMAR 2 5 198;

10jllil8ili2i3i^

i

B

&ECUC

PMiS'tf

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work. J Q

N

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal AddresS of Person Certifying

- T. Pryslak - 534 Berry Street, Winnipeg. Manitoba R3H OR9Date Certified

March 14, 1983Certified bv^Sigrurtu/e)

1362 ( 81/9)

Ministryot

ReSlcesOntario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Shoal - P5 Grid 'B 1 The Mining A

Instructions: Please type or print,— I f number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

Do not use shaded areas below.

ote: -

Type of SurveyU)

GeophysicalTownship or Area

M1949Claim Holdar(t)

Selco Inc,Prospector's Licence No.

T190Address

Survey Company55 University Ave., Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7

Date of Survey (frornfli.to) . rt -Feb. 83Selco Inc. Day Mo. l Yr. Day l Mo. | Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut

4 mis.Name and Address of Author (of Geo Technical report)

T. Pryslak - 534 Berry Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3H OR9Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the tame grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

20

40

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on ClaimU)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choke. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

623794

623795

589134

589155

Expend. Days Cr.

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

M1NIN3 LANDS SECTION

Expend, l Dayt Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Date Approved as Recorded

Certification Verifying Report of Workl hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

T. Pryslak - 534 Berry Street, Winnipeg , Manitoba R3H OR9Date Certified

March 14, 1983Certified

1362 ( 81/9)

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Shoal P7 Grid 'C' The Mining Act

•l? 9- X""9*~ P lease type or print. *^ f ~ 0 —S— I f number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a l ist.— Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(t)

GeophysicalClaim Holder(t)

Selco Inc.

Township or Area

M2339Prospector's Licence No.

T190Add ran

Survey Company55 University Avenue, Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7

Date of Survey (from 61 to)Feb. '83

Day l Mo. | Yr. Day | Mo. | Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut

12 mis.Selco Inc.Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

T. Pryslak - 534 Berry Street. Winnipeg. Manitoba R3H OR9Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

GeophysicalHLEM and VLF

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days perClaim

4040

Days perClaim

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calc ulation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S - 15C

Total )ays Credits

Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected

Date, l . ~ ~ RStHcvirVvB^ ^

jupea H

^S c *n^

^AgernjSignature)

S*\

Certification Verifying Report of Workhereby certify that 1 have a personal

or witnessed same during and/or after

Mining ClaimPrefix

KNumber

533164533165533166533167533168533169623402623659623660623791623792623793

Expend. Days Cr.

L

tt? t i H

A

r-

i*M

[i5

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Data BenafdBa1 ——— , ——————Recorded

^0/nw-**/*3 -

l Date Approved a* R^Qrcfe' —— ZT&Stf?±S XL.

Mining ClaimPrefix

REi\\

HNING

*- KEMtf

1 /-

MAr?

2^A

Number

CftVt'K 1 5 1983

Expend. Dayi Cr.

3—

LANDS SECTION

"^ o -v "r — — .,''\'G D iV. '

^ "bZ t) m :j L hi-l'?^rftg|"^~- i * m ,ii j

Total number of mining claims covered by this . report of work. i c.

Minj/rp*

iiffifna

eVder ———

^aaUcs^lector , f'

Kt^fhV-/4-K '———— ————————————— f———— ——————— J ———

and intimate knowledge of the facts set 'forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

nipeg Manitoba P3H QP^Tbate" Certified

1 March 14, 1983Certified byjaigna/C/e) S

136? (81/9)

Ministryof GeotechnicalSSrces "-p""

Ontario Approval

File

Mining Lands Comments 7

CE "To: Geophysics

Comments

roved f~l Wish to see again with corrections

To: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

[) Approved |~] Wish to see again with correctionsSignature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

l l Approved l Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

l ]TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1593 (81/10)

inc. 55 University Avenue Suite 1700Toronto Ontario M5J 2H7 Telephone: (416) 361 0794Telex: 06 22537 Cable: Selcoex Toronto

April 21, 1983

Ministry of Natural Resources Mining Lands Section Room 6450, Whitney Block Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario

li-

R EC EI ViLand Management'C1RCU! ATECOMMITS PLEASE : :' : PY nv ~"

APR 221983A'-iDERSON

i 'iO."ITON

Dear Sir,

RE: SHOAL PROJECT - PROPERTY 6 - M.2339

Further to my letter (April 13, 1983) in which I enclosed the Report and drawings for this group of claims; I have now received the final drawings SO 3580 and SO 3580B, please find copies enclosed.

Yours very truly,

SELCO INC.

J.E. RackleyClaims Control Co-ordinator

JER:rt Encl.

1983 04 21 2.5474

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources808 Robertson StreetBox 5160Kenora, OntarioP9N 3X9

Dear Sir:

We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims K 533164 et al 1n the Areas of Shoal Lake, Echo Bay and Boys Township.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1360

A. Barr:se

cc: Selco Incorporated Toronto, OntarioAttention: Ms. J.E. Rackley.

IRC 55 University Avenue Suite 1700Toronto Ontario M6J 2H7 Telephone: (416) 361 0794Telex: 06 22537 Cable: Selcoex Toronto

April 13, 1983

Ministry of Natural Resources Mining Lands Section Room 6450, Whitney Block Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario

Dear Sir,

RE: SHOAL PROJECT - PROPERTY 6 - M.2339

Further to our Report of Work (Feb. 16, 1983) please find enclosed the following:-

CONTENT

{in duplicate) Geophysical Report Technical Data Sheets Drawings No. SO 3580 (B)

RECEIVED,^K l 5 1983

MINING LANDS SECTION

I apologize for submitting preliminary drawings, our field operations were working under a tight time-frame and I am expecting the finished drawings to be available within 2 weeks.

Yours very truly,

SELCO INC.

J.E. RackleyClaims Control Co-ordinator

JERcrt End.

• pMfe^M* ^ ^^^V 55 University Avenue Suite 1700• l if ^^^/^^^ Toronto Ontario M5J2H7 Telephone:(416)361 0794

Telex: 06 22537 Cable: Selcoex Toronto

April 13, 1983

Ministry of Natural Resources Kt^C* Mining Lands SectionRoom 6450, Whitney Block M l 5 1983Queen's ParkToronto, Ontario MINING LANDS SECTION

Dear Sir,

RE: SHOAL PROJECT - PROPERTIES 5 8. 7 - M.1949. 2339

Further to our Report of Work (March 21, 1983) please find enclosed the following:-

CONTENT

(in duplicate) Geophysical ReportsTechnical Data Sheets Drawings No. SO 3547, 3547B, 3547C

SO 3548, 3548B SO 3550, 3550B

Yours very truly,

SELCO INC.

x*—^ —* - ""^^ C'~~-~x-;" *t-"' ' x*"^ ,

J.E. RackleyClaims Control Co-ordinator

JER:rtEncl.

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

SHOAL - P5GRID 'A' 1

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

"Z.o aV)

SE(Ko

Type of Survey(s).

Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)^

GeophysicalM.1949Selco Inc. - 55 University Ave..Suite 1700. Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Selco Inc._______^_^_^^_^^^_Survey Company

Author of Report A.P. Pryslak

Address of Author 534 Berry St.. Winnipeg. Man. R3H OR9

Covering Dates of Survey

Total Miles of Line Cut

Feb. '83 - Mar. '83(linecutting to office)

6.5 miles

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

Electromagnetic.

DAYS per claim

Radiometric

-Other

Geological.

Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

^G:or Agent

-?

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

K'(prefix)'

...L....,

.saam.........(number)

.589X32........

• ••••••••* *v\ •••••••••••••••t* * VA4 A 4k An ********t***

............J8L.................J5MU7..i

iRICEIVED

TOTAL CLAIMS. 10

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations —0^83 _____ Mag*530 Station interval 50' (same at 100')

Profile scale _____ l " :2QK,

Number of Readings EMS383

Line spacing _______ 100J

Mag"530

Contour interval Every 100 Gammas to 500 Gammas

Instrument

Every 500 Gammas thereafter

Geometrics G816

Accuracy — Scale constant.

Diurnal correction method.

gammaBase Station

Base Station check-in interval (hours)——————^^^————....—————^—..—..^-—.——Base Station location and value Intersection at Base Lines and Cross Lines

ELECTROMAGNETIC Coil configurationfVijl separation

1

Accuracy .

Method:Frpqnrnry 444

Horizontal

1+

H7

25m and 250mn w

CH Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back Hln line

(specify V.L. F. station)

CD Parallel line

Parameters mpasnred

Instrument

In-phase and quadrature components of secondary field as a percentage of primary field.

Scale constant

Corrections made.

o Base station value and location ___.^——.-

Elevation accuracy—-

<

OiQu.

Instrument

Method D Time Domain

Parameters - On time

- Off time ___

D Frequency Domain

Frequency —————

Range ————————

Delay time __________—_————___~

Integration time _______.^ ......____.-—

Power ——,

Electrode array __—___-

Electrode spacing _. — .-

Type of electrode __- ^.

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument^—-———^-——^^———-^——————-...--—-...-...——..—.—.—^—— Range.Survey Method ———--——————---———-——-^———————^^—-^-—-—.—..——.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument ———Values measured

Energy windows (levels)——^——————^—-——.—-.—^-—-———..—^—^—^—-—....——Height of instrument______________________________Background Count, Size of detector-——-—-—^———-^—-^^-^^—^-——..—^^^—.^—-.—.-—-——————.-——Overburden ——————-———^^^^—^——————.-—^—^———-...——.———.———.—^^^..—.

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey—.-——.-———-——————-————————Instrument _______ .——.. ___.— .—————————Accuracy______.—..-....—————.—-——————-.-——Parameters measured.......____...__,.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)—. .--

Instrument(s) ——.--. ..—(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy__..-.-..... ............- .._....^.... ..(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used. ....... ....... _ .......^...—————————

Sensor altitude._^-.... .^.-..-. ^ .....-.-^. . ^—^-^^———^^-^.

Navigation and flight path recovery method—.- ._....,^,^.———^——

Aircraft altitude_-. ..... ............ . ___.. -.-..__.__________ t.inp Sparing

Miles flown over toial are.i..... .... . .... _.. ^ .__________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection________

Soil Horizon Sampled- Horizon Development- Sample Depth————— Terrain—————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent D

p.p. m. CDp. p. b. D

Cu, Pb,

Others—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-{circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. --———-———

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis———..

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——..

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory_ Extraction Method__ Analytical Method —— Reagents Used ————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General.

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File SHOAL - P5

GRID 'B 1

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

lOCd M

Type of Survey(s).

Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)—

GeophysicalM. 1949Selco Inc. - 55 University Ave.Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7

Survey Company. Author of Report.

Selco Inc.A. P. Pryslak

Address of Author. 534 Berry St.. Winnioea. Man. R3H OR9

Covering Dates of Survey.

Total Miles of Line Cut—

Feb. '83 - Mar. '83(linecutting to office)

4 miles

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

~ , . . GeophysicalDAYS

per claim

?0

40

-Other.Geological.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

HATR, ftfrf. V4 -SAuthor of Reporter Agent

Res. Geol. . Qualifications J- ' -3 l f vPrevious Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

.....K....,'(prefix)'

K

.6.2.3794........(number)

623795

K 589134

i

K tt

AVR 1 5 1983

..M1N1NJG..LAMD5..SJ;.CHQN.

TOTAL CLAIMS.

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations EM S 2Q7 Mag=257___________Number of Readings EM*2Q7 Mag-257

Station interval____50' (some at 100').———————.Line spacing.

Profile scale_______l": 202———————\———-———^^-^—————Contour interval Every 1QQ Gammas to 5QQ Gamma s—————-——

Every 500 Gammas thereafter

Instrument_____Geometrics G816———————————......——Accuracy — Scale constant -— 1 Diurnal correction method Ra g pBase Station check-in interval (hours).^^.———^^ Base Station location and value intersection

Instrument Apex Max-Min II

XECTROMAGNETKCoil configurationTojl separation

Accuracy,Method: Frequency ™ ^

Horizontal125m and 250m+

CD Fixed transmitter d Shoot back Sp In line Hz

(specify V.L.F. station)

ED Parallel line

Parameters measured In-phase and quadrature components of secondary fieldas a percentage of primary field.

Instrument ——.^—^——-—^-^———-———^——-—-————————————-—-—-—————^—Scale constant.Corrections made.

^

o Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

7tOM4

5Ni-Hrt^ Oo* Qb] OQ ZHH

grtt-H

rt

Method D Time Domain CD Frequency DomainParameters - On time Frequency .

Off time Range. ..— TVlay time

— Integration time

Power . .... . .... . .. . —————————————

Electrode array —————————————————————————————————————————————————— - — — ——— —— —Electrode spacing — - ———————————————————————————————————————————— - ————————————Tvoe of electrode .. ....., ———————————————————————————————————————————

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument___________________________________________ Range.Survey Method ————-———————————————————^^——————.———.——-——

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument.Values measured .

Energy windows (levels) -——.—————.^———.—————.—....—...^^-^^————.—.——Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector————————————-^^^—^—^^———.....——.—-^—.^^——..—..—Overburden —————————————-—————..—.—--..-—————...——^-—.—...———

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey———————————————————————Instrument ————^—^——^-—————^——————

Accuracy————————————————————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ————

Instrument(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy———————————————(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used^—^^————————-——.—.——^——^^^^^-——

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight———————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth_____ Terrain—————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent D

aD

per cent p. p. m. p. p. b.

Cu, Pb,

Others_

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ———————-——

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used ——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory—. Extraction Method—— Analytical Method ——.Reagents Used .—--—-

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

Genera General.

Sgwsb O

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

SHOAL - P7 GRID 'C 1

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) Geophysical

Township or Area M.2339—-——..^^-——————..——ClaimHoirier(s) Selco I nc - " 5 5 University Ave..

Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7Survey Company SelCQ Inc.

Author of Report A.P. PryslakAddress of Ai.thnr 534 Berry St.. Winnipeg. Man. R3H OR9 Covering Dates of Survey__E^b.' 83 - Mar.' 83

Total Miles of Line Cut —————(linecutting to office)

12 miles

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer——Radiometric——

—Other————-—

DAYS per claim

40

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic Radiometric(enter days per claim)

DATE:.Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. Qualifications C. -

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

K 533164(prefix)

K(number)

533165

K

K

533166

533167

..If..

K

533168 t

533169,

K

K

623402

623659

K

K

.6.23660..

623791

.L K

..6..?.?.?.?.?.. 623793

AHK l 5 1988

TOTAL CLAIMS. 12

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey f

Number of Stations-jE^—Jte^S___________Number of Readings EM*530 Mag'683

Station interval 5 0 ' ( S0m6 a t 1 00 ')_______________Line .paring 400'_______________________1 " - 902. Profile scale_____^ '* u*________________________________________________________

Contour inte^i ^^y 1 00 Gammas to 500 GammasEvery 500 Gammas thereafter

Instrument ——Geometrics G816——————————{j' Accuracy - Scale constant ± I 9ammaZO

Diurnal correction method Base Station

Base Station check-in interval (hours)-^-————————.^—.——.^^——.—.....—.———.Base Station location and value Intersection at Base Lines and Cross Lines

Instrument Apex Max-Mi n II_______Coil configuration Horizontal_______Coil separation 125m and 250m————

* 0.535 -. Accuracy ——————~——————————————?J Method: d Fixed transmitter d Shoot back 10In line d Parallel line

- Frequency 444 Hz______________(specify V.L.F. station)

, In-phase and quadrature components of secondary fieldParameters measured i-.L.,-.--^...!....^ , ,f . .. :..,^.. *4-iJ______________-—^—^asaperuenLdyt UTprimary — ~—--

Instrument ————————————————————————————Scale constant __Corrections made.

^

O Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ____Z Method d Time Domain d Frequency DomainQP Parameters — On time ___________________________ Frequency.< N3 H3 ^

i/:or

— Off time ___________________________ Range.— Delay time ——-—-..—-————^—-—————-——.^-^— Integration time —,.^—————————————————

Q tf Power.W3 ' Electrode arrayZ E lectrode spacing

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument________________________________________. Range.Survey Method .^—^——-—.-—.^^-—————...————.-—™—————.——-..—.——..——

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured .

Energy windows (levels)———^^-^^—^-——————--———-————..———-.——-.—.Height of instrument______________________________Background Count.Size of detector^-—————-——^^^—-..—.———-————-..—————^—.—^—.^^—^—

Overburden ——-——---—-—--^—-——--—.^—-^-—^-——-—————-^—.——.—.—..——(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey————^-^^——^—.—^^—————.

Instrument ——————————————————————————— Accuracy____________________________Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s) ————

Instrument(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy-—————^——^—-————(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used——^——————————————-——^———™.—..——

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_______________________________Line Spacing—— Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection—————-^.^

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth————— Terrain___:—————.

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent

p.p. m. p. p. b.

D D D

Cu, Pb,

Others—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field Analysis (-Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used ——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ,——————^^^.

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used --—.

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method^— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used .————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

General____.. General.

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

''M S'.'RV!.,Y'- i 1 i-. -' .'i utir ;;nrvcy, J'V'.'cify ''-it:i IIM -ruh type of survey

Number of Stations VLFS 58Q____________________Number of Readings VI F=5Rn

Station interval 50' and 100'_________________Line sparing 400 '—————

Profile scale_____1";2QX^—-—^——^.—^^^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^Contour interval.

Instrument ——...———^.—.c iAccuracy — Scale constant.

Diurnal correction method.

' Base Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value —..-..-.

Instrument Ggom'cs EM16Coil configuration N/A

Coil separation ___N/AAccuracy IP 1";5n 0/ QR l"

Method: d Fixed transmitter D Shoot back Q In line d! Parallel line17.8 KHz Cutler NAAFrequency———-—-—-——^——^——————-—————————-——————-——^———————-——^^^————.

(specify V.L.F. station)Parameters measured I n "Phase a nd quad-phase components of vertical magnetic —————-

field as a percentage of horizontal primary field.

Instrument ——————————————————————————.——————————————————————————————————

Scale constant

Corrections made.

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ———————————————————————————————————————————————— Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain

Parameters - On time ___________________________ Frequency —————

— Off time ___________________________ Range ————————

— Delay time _________________________:——

— Integration time —————.^—-r.———-—^-——————^

Power _____________—————————————————————————————————————

Electrode array —

Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

GRID 'E'

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

OFFICE USE ONLY

Type of Sur Township o Claim Hold

Survey Corr

Author of F

Address of

Covering Di

Total Miles

SPECIAL

vpy( s) Geophysicalr Area M. 1949

sr( s) Selco Inc. - 55 University Ave.,Suite

ipany Se! CO

teporr A. P.

1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7Inc.

PryslakAnthnr 534 Berry St., Winnioea. Man. R3H OR9ites nf Survey

of Line Cut

PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

AIRBORNI Magnetome

HATR. HJ

Res. Geol.

Feb. '83 - Aor.'83(linecutting to office)

8.5 miles

DAYSf~, . . . per claim Geophysical

— Magnpt"T"'tpr 40

-DtWr

r.,^m;™i. CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne turveyi)

ter Rlprtrnmpgnptir , , RaHjnrnptrir(enter dayi per claim)

}r\A -&S Sir.NATITRF.- r A ^- *"""*"? -c; ""-*"^

Previous SurveysFile No.

^ -Author of Report or Agent

Qualifications ^ ^ ^

Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

K 564170(prefix) (number)

K 564171

K 564172

K 564173

K 564174

,,,....,..,..K....,............564175..............

.........,,,...JL............,..5MU.fL........... k: 564178K 59QQQ8

K 5.9.QQQ9

;""""""RICIIWD""'-"-"APR 1 5 1983

TOTAL CT AIMS H

i

j ta

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations EMS479 Ma9=519___________Number of Readings EfM79 Ma 3=5]Q Station interval 100' (some at 50')—————————Line spacing____400'_________

Profile scale______1":20X—————————,————————^-^^.—^.^-^,^-^---Contour interval Every 100 Gammas -1000 to +1000———.——^^^—^———-^———

Every 1000 Gammas thereafter

Instrument Geometrics G816————————.——.——-——————^—————————Si * ih Accuracy - Scale constant ~ l gamma____^_____________________^_^_^^.^__Z Diurnal correction method Base Station___________________________m—^————

lo

N X

Base Station check-in interval (hours)—^———^^^—..—.-..————.-™-—————Base Station location and value Intersection at Base Lines and Cross Lines

ECTROMAGNETIC

Instrument

Coil configuration Coil separationArrnrary

Method: Freciuencv 444

Horizontal125m and 250m

i 0.5*

d Fixed transmitter d Shoot back Hz

0In line d Parallel line

J (specify V.L.F. station) W

Parameters measured In-phasp and ciuadr3tyir'^ components of secondaryas a percentage of primary field.

Instrument ^————^^—.^.^—^—^^—^^-^——^^—————^—^——^^—^^^^Scale constant —.

Corrections made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ™————————,——————————————————————————————————— Method D Time Domain d Frequency Domain

- On time ___________________________ Frequency —^....^.- Off time ___________________________ Range ————————

time.——————————————————————————— Integration time

Power.Q u:Electrode array.Electrode spacing

: of electrode

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument_________________________________________ Range.Survey Method-—-——————————-————————————^—^-—.—^-—-—————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured.Energy windows (levels)————————^^—————-^—^——^^^^^^^^^^——-—— Height of instrument______________________________Background Count. Size of detector————-^^^——-.—-——————-——-————-————-——.————.—

Overburden .^-—-——————.———^^.^-^^^-—^—^—————————.^^-^^.^^—^—^(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey-—^—^^—-—————————————^—

Instrument ___________________________

Accuracy———————————————————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)————

Instrument(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy—————^^—^———————.(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used ^———^^—————^^^^^^..-.—^..--..^-^^^^—^^..

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_________________________________Line Spacing—— Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection________

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain—————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

D CD D

Cu, Pb,

Others—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ————————-

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ———-

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——.

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory.— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used -————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General.

LL i/E.

JZ X /Csr ( t/ x

j22. x5 ^ ooio

l//

'33

x 6-

i/ (X4-C

v/ l/ i/t---' t/

i/ /. -7 3. xi/

v//75

5m r-//uL

t

T"/" /Ac,

0/2C.

NOTES

400 surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

Flooding Rights reserved to 1064 mean sea l evel.

Islands in Shoal Lake and inlets thereto do not form part of Glass Township

52E10NW9492 2.5474 ECHO BAY

O-950 00'

ECHO BAY and BOYS TP M.194994045'00"

49" 77 30 n

C\J

LJ

O

en

xCD

LU OxCO

ozCO

490 3000 J

D. 2384*9111 .489112 ;s9 lo32l

7I07S47 -078- 710786

.589741 1589742 1589 74 3

- - --J IT J. . — fc MCA3I

490 37'30"

37'

36

35

33

32'

31

ro roCJ

COT?OO

O)

•*—

X4-

O

O)

O-J

XGO

LJ-J

95000' 59 58' 57' 56 55 54' 53' 52' 51'

MONUMENT BAY (Lake of the Woods)

50'

M.2682

49' 47 46 94f

L 490 30'00'

45'00"

495 944

LEGEND

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.

OTHER ROADS

TRAILS

SURVEYED LINES:TOWNSHIPS, BASE LINES, ETC. LOTS,MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS.ETC.

UNSURVEYED LINES! LOT LINES PARCEL BOUNDARY MINING CLAIMS ETC.

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAYUTILITY LINES NON-PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS SUBDIVISION ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEGMINES

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT

PATENT, SURFACE S MINING RIGHTS

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

MINING RIGHTS ONLY

LEASE, SURFACE SMINING RIGHTS

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

MINING RIGHTS ONLY

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION

CROWN LAND SALE

OROER-IN-COUNCIL

RESERVATION

CANCELLED .

SAND S GRAVEL

SYMBOL

V

m HHT c.s ocCO 0 O

SCALE : l INCH - 40 CHAINSO 500 IOOO B 000

FEET

METRESO 200 4OO 600 800 l KM.

ACRES HECTARES

AREA

SHOAL.IATE OF ISSUE

K'Ero

AKE

MINING DIVISION

KENORA

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

DATE 10th. SEPTEMBER/73

NATIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES

52E 10

PLAN No.

M 2339l V l — L— \J \J*J

22500N

22900N

233-

OON

23700N

241-

OON

245-

OON

24900N

2 53-0 ON

257-OON

261-

OON

265-

OON

26900N

273-

OON

277-

OON

281-

OON

285-

OON

28900N

60-OOE -

65-OOE -

70-O

OE -

r

205

-194

" -239

-246

- -l 19

-81

\- -258

-252

- -241

-235

-227

-223

7500E -

80-O

OE

85-OOE -

90-O

OE -

9&OOE

100-OOE -

l O 5-

0 O E -

L- -107

-97

*-

-113

225-OON

2290

0N23

300N

237-

OON

2 41

-0 ON

2 4 5-

0 ON

2490

0N253-OON

257-OON

261-

OON

265-OON

269-OON

273-OON

277-

OON

281-

OON

285-

OON

28&OON

- 6

0-DO

E

- 6500E

- 7

0-OO

E

75-O

OE

8000E

BASELINE

AZ.

30"

- 8

5-OOE

MAGN

ETOM

ETER

IN

STRU

MENT

TY

PE:

GEOM

ETRI

CS

G-S

ISR

eadi

ngs

in G

amm

as:

Bas

e:

60,

000

Pro

file:

Co

nto

ur

Inte

rval

: E

very

100

0 ga

mm

as f

rom

-5

00

0 g

amm

as t

o-l S

OO

gam

mas

Eve

ry 1

00 g

amm

as f

rom

-l

500 g

amm

as t

o 50

0 ga

mm

as

Eve

ry 5

00 g

amm

as

to

50

00

gam

mas

E

very

l O

OP

gam

mas

th

ere

after

__

- 9

000E

OTH

ER

IN

FO

RM

AT

ION

SE

E

DRW

G.

Nfi.

S0.3

547B

SO. 3

547

C

TYP

E

H.L

.E.M

., LO

CA

TIO

N

PLA

N,

CLA

IMS

V.L.

F.

- 9

5-O

OE

\

- 10

CKJO

E

O L

40

0

FEE

T

- 10

500E

EX

PLO

RA

TIO

N

SHO

AL

LAK

E

PRO

JEC

T

PRO

PER

TY

7.

GR

ID '

C1- O

PTI

ON

MAG

. S

UR

VE

Y

DR

AW

N 6

Y

L-

TR

AC

ED

BY

SD

.

DA

TE

OA

TF

Mar

ch

H83

N.T

.S.

PL

AN

S0

.35

47

52E

1QN

W94

92 2

.54

74

EC

HO

BA

Y

65-O

OE -

7000E -

75-O

OE -

80-O

OE

85-OOE

90-O

OE -

95-O

OE -

100-

OOE -

22500N

229-

OON

233-

OON

237-

OON

241-

OON \

245

-OON

281-

OON

285-OON

289-

OON

Shoal

\ Lake

PROPERTY 7

Shoa

l Lo k e

GRID 'C

FAIR

SE

RV

ICE

O

PTI

ON

LOC

ATI

ON

PL

AN

CLA

IM

MA

P M

.2339-O

NT

Sca

le

1=1/

4 m

i.

- 6

5'O

OE

70-O

OE

- 7

5-O

OE

80-O

OE

- 8

5-O

OE

- 9

000E

- 9

5-O

OE

- 1

00-O

OE

BA

SE

LIN

E

AZ.

30

0

ELE

CTR

OM

AG

NE

T/C

IN

STR

UM

EN

T TY

PE

t A

pex

MA

X-M

IN

E

HORI

ZONT

AL

LOO

P (P

erce

nt o

f Pr

imor

y Fi

eld)

Fr

eque

ncy:

44

4 Hz

. Ca

ble

Leng

th:

400

ft.

In Ph

ase:

*—

* —

—L

Oi

-2

Out

of P

hase

Q

uadr

atur

eCo

nduc

tor

Wid

th;

Prof

ile

Scal

e:

l"

20 *A

OTH

ER

IN

FO

RM

AT

ION

SEE

DRW

G.

N4

S0.

3547

SO

. 354

7C

TY

PE

MA

G.

V.L

.F.

O L

40

0_

lFE

ET

52E^

e^w^

4^^

2.54

74 E

CHO

BAY

225-

OON

229-

OO

N 23

3-O

ON

237-

OO

N 24

1-O

ON

245D

ON

24

9-O

ON

253-

OO

N 25

7-OO

N 26

1-OO

N 26

5-Q

ON

2690

0N

273O

ON

27

7-O

ON

281-

OON

285-

OO

N 28

9-OO

N

^^^

^

^^

J 1 in

c.E

XP

LOR

ATI

ON

SH

OA

L LA

KE

PR

OJE

CT

PR

OP

ER

TY

7,

H.L

E.

GR

ID '

C'- O

PTIO

NM

. SU

RVE

Y

DR

AW

N B

Y

DA

TE

L.

C.

Fe

b.

1^*

3

TRAC

ED B

Y D

ATE

ba-f

epl*

* S

-J.

Mar

ch

W W

N.T

.S.

-

PLA

N

S0.

3547

B

22

0

225-OON

22MON

233-

OON

237-

OON

241-

OON

245-

OON

60-O

OE -

65-OOE -

s o

S l

S 1

6 2

6 2

4 3

l P

70-OOE -

75-OOE -

800QE -

85-O

OE -

9000E -

95-OOE

//

24900N

253-

OON

257-

OON

261-OO

N26

5-OO

N26

9-OO

N27

3-OO

N277-OON

281-

OON

285-

OON

28&OON

1 r i i \^^^^

^^"™—

\ \ \

* ** * V l i \

1

t i 1 1 f i

l' 1

" " "

" ' ?

/" 1 x

7 "^

. , i ^ ^

^

4

1 1"t

^ 3 2 i

1 t T 3 0

- -T -12

- -i

: -5

^ ;

1 ,

i i

* !

l

'l 4

* t

.-

O

*

-:

-4 - t

-•-

.. r

. .

; O

- ^ ;

-i ;

-12

. -? -52

-3C

-^E

' -3

0

-4C

-42

1 -i

f

12 12

* *

.*

S^ X y

"••.

* - *

o

, 1

/'

. . f

' ^^-

'"

*

*s i / /

x

1 \ 1 1•.^

\ \1 - 1 : '

" 4 1 1 2 \ •\6 \ 16 2G 27

- 35 ie

* -.

- -i - 1

c

\J ^x*'.

\. ^ \" : t s

7 m m

L^- f

*

. . i

-4 -5 -i

. -4

/

100-

OOE -

105-

OOE -

3 -l

3 -l

3 CI

6 -10

4 O

2 l l

16\

O

O \2 \

27

-,\

is^- -4

;3

12

:3

::

- 4

; 2

-e

24

-14

19

65-O

OE

- 7

0-OO

E

- 7500E

80-OOE BASELINE

AZ. 30

0

- 8

5-O

OE

ELEC

TRO

MAG

NETI

C .N

STH

UM

ENT

TYPE

* V.

L.F.

Inst

rum

ent'

GE

ON

ICS

E

M.

16St

atio

n^C

UT

LER

IPPr

ofile

Sc

ale-

Q

p |"

:20

0XoFi

ltere

d Di

p An

gles

(F

rase

r)

Cont

our

Inte

rval

--

- 9

0-OO

E

SEE

DRW

G.

Nfi

SO.3

547

SO. 3

547

B

TY

PE

MA

G.

H.L

.E.M

, LO

CA

TIO

N

PLA

N,

CLA

IMS

- 9

5-OO

E

\

- 10

0-ooE

o L400

FEET

- 10

5-OOE

SH

OA

L LA

KE

PR

OJE

CT

PRO

PER

TY 7

, G

RID

'c'- O

PTIO

N

225-

OO

N 22

9-O

ON

233-

OO

N 23

700N

24

1-O

ON

245-

OO

N 24

9-O

ON

253-

OO

N 25

7-O

ON

261-

OO

N 26

5'O

ON

26

MO

N

273^

0N

2770

0N

281-

OO

N 28

5-O

ON

2890

0N

^RA

WN

BY

LG

T R

AC

ED

8Y

DcH

-apl

ol-

5-73

,

V.L

.F.

SU

RV

EY

DA

TE F

tb.

[*?B

5

DA

TE M

arc

h 1

*583

NT

. s.

PLA

N

SO. 3

547

C

52E10NW9492 2.5474 ECHO BAY

230

10-OON -

SOON -

BflSE LINE -

5-OOS -

10-OOS -

52E1eNI9492 2 .5474 ECHO BAT240

O 400E 8-OOE 12-OOE 16-OOE 20-OOE 2400E

O 4-0 O E 8-OOE 12-OOE 16-OOE 20-OOE 2400E

- 1000N

- 5-OON

DflSE LINE AZ.90 0

- 5-OOS

- 10-OOS

MAGNETOMETER INSTRUMENTTYPE: G EOMETRICS csie

. r 35*Readings in Gammas: L -51S) Bose: 60,000 gammasProfile:Contour Interval: Every l OOgammas from-lOOOto-t-500 gammas

Every SQOgammas thereafter.

OTHER INFORMATIONSEE DRWG. NO

SO-3548 BTYPE

H.L.E.M., LOG.PLAN,CLAIMS

OL

200 400 J

FEET

i EXPLORATION

SHOAL LAKE PROJECT

PROPERTY 5 —GRID 'B'

MAG. SURVEYDRAWN BY

L.C-

TRACED SYPlot J.G.

DATEFeb. I383

DATE1/larc.K 1365

N.T.S. PLAN

S0.3548

o 4-0 O E 8-0 O E 12-OOE 16-OOE 20-OOE 2400E

10-OON -

5-OON -

BflSE LINE

5-0OS -

10-OOS -

O 4-OOE 800E 12-OOE 16-OOE 20-OOE 24-OOE

- 10-OON

- 5-OON

BflSE LINE

- 5-OOS

- 10-OOS

52E10NW9492 2.5474 ECHO BAY 25©

-N-

LOCATION PLAN

CLAIM MAP M.I945,ONTScale : l"' 1/4 mile

ELECTROMAGNETIC INSTRUMENT

TYPE: APEX MAX- WIN E

HORIZONTAL LOOP ( Percent of Primary Field)Frequency: 4 44 HzCable Length: 400ftIn Phase: e— e — r ' 2[, Out of Phose

QuadratureConductor Width: Profile Scole: l" 20 0Xo

OTHER INFORMATIONSEE DRWG. N2SO. 3548

TYPEMAG.

O 100 200

FEET

i EXPLORATION

SHOAL LAKE PROJECTi -JPROPERTY 5 —GRID B

H.L.E.M. SURVEYDRAWN BY

L.C

TRACED 9YDaia Plot

DATE

DATE1383

NT. S. PLAN

S0.3548B

o

25-OON -

20-OON -

1500N -

10-O

ON -

5-OON -

BflS

E LINE

500S -

1000S -

15-O

OS -

20-OOS -

O

52E19NW9492 2.5474

ECHO SAY

260

l&OOE

20-0

0 E

24-O

OE2&OOE

32-OOE

3&OOE

40-OOE

44-OOE

4&OOE

52-OOE

5&OOE

4-0 O

E&OOE

12-O

OE

BASE LI

NE AZ.640

-153

4-OO

E8-OOE

12-OOE

l&OOE

20-O

OE24

-OOE

2800E

32-O

OE3&OOE

4000E

44-O

OE4&OOE

- 2

5-OO

N

- 2

0-OO

N

- 1500N

- SOON

MAGN

ETOM

ETER

IN

STRU

MENT

TY

PE: G

EOME

TRIC

S GS

IGR

eadi

ngs

in G

amm

as:

[' "7

Ba

se:

60

,00

0 g

amm

as

Pro

file:

Con

tour

Inte

rval:

Eve

ry l

OO

gom

mas

fro

m-1

30

0 t

o -f-

BOO

gam

mas

Eve

ry 5

00 g

amm

as

ther

eafte

r

OT

HE

R

INF

OR

MA

TIO

NS

EE

D

RW

G.

NOS

0.3

550B

TY

PE

H.L

.E.M

., LO

G. P

LA

N,

CLA

IMS

O L

200

400

_l

FE

ET

EX

PLO

RA

TIO

N

SH

OA

L LA

KE

P

RO

JEC

T

PR

OP

ER

TY

5

—G

RID

MA

G.

SU

RV

EY

DR

AW

N B

YL

C

TRA

CE

D B

YD

ata

P

lot-

J-

G

DA

TE

Fab

DAT

EM

arc

h

N.T

.S.

PL

AN

S0

.35

50

l&OOE

2 OOP E

24-OOE

2&OO

E32-OOE

3&OO

E4000E

44-O

OE48

-OOE

52-0

O E

56-n

OE

O4-

0 O E

800E

12-OOE

2500N -

20-O

ON -

15-O

ON -

10-O

ON -

5-0O

N/ -

BflSE

LINE -

5-OOS -

10OOS -

15-O

OS -

O4-

OOE

8-OO

E12-OOE

16-OOE

2000E

24-O

OE28-OOE

32-O

OE36-OOE

4000E

44-OOE

4&OOE

PROPERTY 5

BASE LINE AZ.640

LO

CA

TIO

N

PLA

N

CLA

IM

MAP

M

.I94

9-O

NT

. S

cale

! l";

1/4

mile

- 2

500N

- 2

&OO

N

- 1

500N

-

1000

N

- &

OO

N

ELE

CTR

OM

AG

NE

TIC

IN

STR

UM

EN

T TY

PE

: A

PE

X

MA

X-M

IN I

I

HO

RIZ

ON

TAL

LOO

P (P

erce

nt

of P

rimar

y Fi

eld)

Fr

eque

ncy:

4

44

Hz

Cobl

e Le

ngth

: 400ft

.In

Ph

ase:

e—

— e

——

Cond

ucto

r W

idth

;

Prof

ile

Scal

e:

l" 20

07o

L-Z

ft

IO

D

Out

of P

hase

Q

uadr

atur

e

OT

HE

R

INF

OR

MA

TIO

NSEE DRWG. NO

SO. 35 50

TYPE

MAG.

O200

l400

FEET

52E

1M

H9492

2.5

47

4

ECH

O

BA

YS

70

lE

XP

LOR

ATI

ON

SHO

AL

LAK

E

PR

OJE

CT

PR

OP

ER

TY

5 —

GR

ID '

A'

H.L

.E.M

. SU

RVE

Y

DR

AW

N B

YL

.C,

TR

AC

ED

BY

Plo

t J.

G.

DA

TE F

ab

.

DA

TE M

arch

13

83

N.T

.S.

PL

AN

S0.

3550

B

085

AV

9

ssoo

"'- '"^s^

SS

/

.***-

'- J"*-

. **!-~"

?'.

K

x

X

\v;ftV

ft*

fttf

MAG

NET

OM

ETER

IN

STR

UM

EN

T TY

PE

'. G

eom

etr

ics

G.8

I6R

eadi

ngs

in G

amm

as:

[ ,7G

S Ba

se:

60,0

00 g

amm

as

Pro

file:

Con

tour

Int

erva

l: E

very

lO

Oga

mm

as f

rom

-IOO

O t

ot

1000

gam

mas

Ev

ery

lOO

Oga

mm

as

ther

eafte

r

OTH

ER

IN

FO

RM

AT

ION

SEE

DR

WG

. N

2S

O-3

580

B

TY

PE

H.L.

E.M

., LO

G. P

LAN

,CLA

IMS

O2

00

400

FE

ET

EX

PLO

RA

TIO

N

SH

OA

L LA

KE

P

RO

JEC

TP

RO

PE

RTY

6

-GR

ID '

E'

MA

G.

SU

RV

EY

DR

AW

N B

Y L.C

.

TR

AC

ED

BY P

lot

DA

TE

Fab

. I3

Q3

DA

TE

383

NT

. S.

PLA

N SO

-358

0

S2E1BNW9492 2.5474 ECHO BAY

290

frRiD

'E'

PR

OP

ER

TY

TL 1

0*00

Mw 0

0*00

M

Tl

10+0

05

CL

AIM

BO

UN

DA

RY

O

N ^^O

RE

L.IM

E.

SO

.3S

SO

-MA

G

SELC

O M

ININ

GIN

STRt

lMEI

Er

Cofld

bclo

r

o

J6N

Cond

ucto

r W

idt h

: Pr

ofile

Sc

ale:

\"-

- 20

07o

//e 11

div

er

Bay

K .5

64

17

4

590008

CLA

IM

BO

UN

DA

RY

ON

SH

OR

E L

INE

590010

PR

OP

ER

TY

6

GR

ID

E

* H

elld

ive

r B

ay

LOC

AT

ION

P

LAN

CLA

IM

MA

P

M.3

339-O

NT

Sca

le

l : 1

/4 m

ile

ELEC

TRO

MA

GN

ETIC

IN

STR

UM

EN

T TY

PE

: A

PEX

MA

X- M

INE

HORI

ZONT

AL

LOO

P (P

erce

nt o

f Pr

imar

y Fi

eW)

Freq

uenc

y :

4 4 4

H z

Cobt

e Le

ngth

: 40

0ft

\ OT

HE

R

INF

OR

MA

TIO

NSEE DRWG. NO

SO-3

580

TYPE

MAG.

O200

400

FEET

52E10NW9492 3.5474 ECHO BAY

310

EX

PLO

RA

TIO

N

SH

OA

L LA

KE

P

RO

JEC

T

PR

OP

ER

TY

6-G

RID

E

H.L

.E.M

. SU

RVE

YD

RA

WN

BY L

.C

TR

AC

ED

BY P

lot

DA

TE

Fab.

DA

TE

Ap

ril

1383

NT

.S.

PL

AN S0.3

580B