19
1 A Geometric Model Based on Frequency That Reveals the Nature of Time Theodore J. St. John, MS, MA, Ph. D. Abstract The purpose of this paper is to present a hypothesis: that frequency is the key to understanding the fundamental nature of time. Time and space are mirror images of each other and they are two different ways of expressing inverse frequency. The reason this is important is because, by starting with frequency the relationships of physics can be expressed by linear equations. It is known that frequency is directly proportional to and thus equivalent to quantum energy. By expressing the relationship of spatial frequency vs. temporal frequency as a simple geometric model, several well-known relationships fall into place without having to stretch the model into warped expressions of spacetime that require complicated hyperbolic functions or field equations. The result is a sensible interpretation of the meaning of time, spacetime, quantum particles and quantum wave functions. The model also lends itself directly to an understanding of how space and time become dissociated and transform into quantum bits of information, which automatically models reality as a quantum computer. The implications of these interpretations provide a bridge between physics, as a physical science, and life sciences that take in information from their surroundings, convolve it with itself as particles and thereby shape and reshape matter, allowing living organisms to change with time and adapt to their environment. Introduction There have been many books and articles about the nature of time, especially since Stephen Hawking, brought it to the forefront in his book A Brief History of time. (Hawking 1990) Physicist Lee Smolin said that understanding the nature of time might be the most important question for this generation of physicists to answer because time holds the secret to understanding the universe. (Smolin, Time Reborn:

Geometric Model based on Frequency · 2021. 1. 17. · Complete Idiot’s Guide to String Theory (Alpha, 2008), “If physicists have learned anything from the long slog to unify

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1

    AGeometricModelBasedonFrequencyThatRevealstheNatureofTimeTheodoreJ.St.John,MS,MA,Ph.D.

    Abstract Thepurposeofthispaperistopresentahypothesis:thatfrequencyisthe

    keytounderstandingthefundamentalnatureoftime.Timeandspacearemirror

    imagesofeachotherandtheyaretwodifferentwaysofexpressinginverse

    frequency.Thereasonthisisimportantisbecause,bystartingwithfrequencythe

    relationshipsofphysicscanbeexpressedbylinearequations.Itisknownthat

    frequencyisdirectlyproportionaltoandthusequivalenttoquantumenergy.By

    expressingtherelationshipofspatialfrequencyvs.temporalfrequencyasasimple

    geometricmodel,severalwell-knownrelationshipsfallintoplacewithouthavingto

    stretchthemodelintowarpedexpressionsofspacetimethatrequirecomplicated

    hyperbolicfunctionsorfieldequations.Theresultisasensibleinterpretationofthe

    meaningoftime,spacetime,quantumparticlesandquantumwavefunctions.The

    modelalsolendsitselfdirectlytoanunderstandingofhowspaceandtimebecome

    dissociatedandtransformintoquantumbitsofinformation,whichautomatically

    modelsrealityasaquantumcomputer.Theimplicationsoftheseinterpretations

    provideabridgebetweenphysics,asaphysicalscience,andlifesciencesthattakein

    informationfromtheirsurroundings,convolveitwithitselfasparticlesandthereby

    shapeandreshapematter,allowinglivingorganismstochangewithtimeandadapt

    totheirenvironment.

    Introduction Therehavebeenmanybooksandarticlesaboutthenatureoftime,especially

    sinceStephenHawking,broughtittotheforefrontinhisbookABriefHistoryoftime.

    (Hawking1990)PhysicistLeeSmolinsaidthatunderstandingthenatureoftime

    mightbethemostimportantquestionforthisgenerationofphysiciststoanswer

    becausetimeholdsthesecrettounderstandingtheuniverse.(Smolin,TimeReborn:

  • 2

    FromtheCrisisinPhysicstotheFutureoftheUniverse2013)Heconcludedthat

    timeisrealinthesensethat:“Whateverisrealinouruniverseisrealinamomentof

    time,whichisoneofasuccessionofmoments.”Anotherphysicist,RichardMuller,

    explainedthattheBigBangasa4-dimensionalexplosion“continuouslycreatesnot

    onlynewspacebutalsonewtime.”(Muller2016)Butmanyothersstillthinkthat

    timeisanillusion(Barbour1999).Andthereareafewwhoconsidertimetobe

    somethingthatcanbeviewedasanintrinsicgeometricpropertyofthree-

    dimensionalspace.Chappell,et.al.presentedthisusingCliffordgeometricalgebra.

    (Chappell,etal.2016)However,they“absorbedtimeintoanexpressionofan

    invariantspacetimedistance”.Soratherthanexplainingthenatureoftime,theyhide

    itinthesquareofaquaternion,whichagreeswithwhatmostCosmologistsbelieve:

    thattimeissomehowmixedwithandthushiddeninspacetocreatespacetime.

    However,thenatureofspacetimeisevenmoremysteriousthantime.

    Generalrelativitytheoryisthemainframeworkthathasbeenusedtoapproachthe

    problemofunderstandingspacetime,andithasservedtoexplainalargebodyof

    observationalinformation,includingtheredshiftinlightfromfar-awaystarsand

    galaxies,nuleosynthesis,(whichpredictstheamountofhydrogenthatshouldhave

    fusedintohelium)andthemicrowavebackgroundradiation,believedtobethe

    “echo”oftheBigBang.(Kaku1993,pg.643)Butthishasgeneratedevenmore

    questionsandcomplextheories,likeStringTheory,M-Theory,CausalSetTheory,

    theAmplituhedronTheoryandLoopTheory.

    AccordingtoGeorgeMusser,contributingeditoratScientificAmericanand

    authorofSpookyActionataDistance(Farrar,StrausandGiroux,2015)andThe

    CompleteIdiot’sGuidetoStringTheory(Alpha,2008),“Ifphysicistshavelearned

    anythingfromthelongslogtounifytheirtheories,itisthatspaceandtimeforma

    systemofsuchstaggeringcomplexitythatitmaydefyourmostardenteffortsto

    understand.”(Musser2018)“Thebottom-linelessonofquantumgravity”said

    Musser,“isthatnotallphenomenaneatlyfitwithinspacetime.Physicistswillneed

    tofindsomenewfoundationalstructure,andwhentheydo,theywillhavecompleted

    therevolutionthatbeganjustmorethanacenturyagowithEinstein.”

  • 3

    Ratherthanproposinganewfoundationalstructure,thispaperreflectson

    andreconsidershowtheoldfoundationswereinterpreted.AccordingtoE.A.Burtt

    inTheMetaphysicalFoundationsofModernScience,beforethedaysofNewton,the

    treatmentoftimeasanindependententitywasconsideredbymanytobea

    philosophicalblunder.(Burtt2003,pg.158)

    “Clearly, justaswemeasurespace, firstbysomemagnitude,and learn

    howmuchit is, later judgingothercongruentmagnitudesbyspace;so

    we first reckon time from some motion and afterwards judge other

    motions by it; which is plainly nothing else than to compare some

    motionswithothersbythemediationoftime;justasbythemediationof

    spaceweinvestigatetherelationsofmagnitudeswitheachother.”

    Inotherwords,aunitoftimeisjustaunitofmotionthatiscapturedor

    “clocked”byacyclicalmotiondeviceasaunitmeasuredinthepast,tobeusedasa

    commondenominatorforothermotion.Spacetimethenissimplyaspatiotemporal

    processthatimplicitlyflowsandweexperienceitasmotion.Butitmustbeexpressed

    asapairofexplicitmeasurablequantitiesthatappearto“dancewitheachother”

    andmoveindependentlywithaninverserelationship.Thisinverserelationshipwill

    beexplainedandillustratedbelowinasimplegeometricmodel.

    TheHypothesis Thehypothesispresentedhereisthatfrequency,whichisdefinedasinverse

    time,e.g.incyclespersecond,shouldbeconsideredthemostfundamental

    spatiotemporalprocess-unitinnature.Thentime,astheinverseoffrequency,is

    simplyamirrorimageofaquantumunitofenergy,bothofwhicharebyproductsof

    relativemotion.Wemaythinkthatwesensetime,butmotion,whichisubiquitous,

    iswhatweactuallysense.Aquantumunitofenergyisjustenergyinmotionand

    thereisnosuchthingasanobjectatrest.Anobjectonlyappearstobeatrestinits

    ownreferenceframe.Itisalwaysinmotionrelativetoeverythingelseinthe

  • 4

    universethatismovingwithrespecttoit.Thereasonthattimeisa“problem”inthe

    firstplaceisbecausewearetaughttothinkofitasaprimaryfundamentalunit.And

    thatisbecausedoingsoallowedearlyphysiciststopredicttheoutcomeofrelative

    motion.Thatiswherethemoneyis,sotospeak,becausemeteringmotionand

    predictingtimeandlocationofarrivalisextremelypracticalanduseful.Butthat

    modelseparatesandhidesthefundamentalnatureofrealityandfoolsusinto

    thinkingthatthephysicalaspectiswhatisreal.Eventuallythatmodelreachedits

    limitandbegantocreateproblems,liketheonesdescribedaboveandother

    “singularityproblems”.(Smolin,TheTroubleWithPhysics2006)

    ThesolutionIsubmitistorecognizefrequency–theinverseoftime–as

    primary.Westartwiththeconceptofenergy.Theword“energy”referstoan

    implicitconceptthatjustis.Tosaythatitisimplicitmeansitcannotbeexpressed,

    onlyimplied.Ifwetrytoexpressit,wemakeitexplicitviatheexpression.Asimplicit

    totheuniverse,energyisubiquitous;itcanneitherbecreatednordestroyed.But

    onceexplicated,(seeDavidBohm’sWholenessandtheImplicateOrder(Bohm1980))

    itcanbechangedinform.Andtheword“form”impliesashapethatcanbe

    representedbyaquantity.Themostfundamentalunitofenergyisaquantumunit,

    andweknowfromquantummechanicsthatitcanbeexpressedasafunctionof

    frequency:𝐸 = ℎ𝑓,whereℎisPlanck’sconstant.Infact,thesameequationholds

    whetherfreferstotemporalfrequency,whichisinversetime𝑓! =!!,orspatial

    frequency,whichisinversespace,𝑓! =!!,wherecisthespeedoflight.Thesis

    usuallywrittenaswavelength(𝜆)asintheequation𝐸 = !!!.Andsince!

    !definesthe

    momentumofaphotonandmomentumimpliestheparticulateformofenergy(a

    quantumparticle),spatialfrequencyisgenerallyignored.Perhapsthatisbecause

    focusingon“objects”isofmoreinteresttothosewhowanttobeobjective.However,

    timeisnotanobjectandsoitcannotbeunderstoodbyfocusingonobjectivereality.

    Method Theapproachusedhereistopresentamodelwithoneunitofenergyandits

    equivalent–oneunitoffrequency–onarectangularcoordinatesystem,asshownin

  • 5

    Figure1(withenergyrepresentedbyavectorarrowwithmagnitudeofone),and

    frequenciesrepresentedasthefirstunittoscaletheaxes.Sothefrequencyofone

    unitofenergywouldbeonecycleperwhateverunityouchoose.Andthevalueofc

    woulddependonthatchoiceofunits.Wewillnotchoosecommonphysicalunits.

    Instead,“naturalunits”areexpressed(i.e.madeexplicit)sothateachoneis“one

    unitofenergy”.

    BecausethetipofeacharrowinFigure1representsthe“particleboundary”

    (thismeanstheenergyboundaryofaquantumparticle,notthephysicalboundary),

    theregionoutsideofoneunitrepresentsthepartoftheuniversethatisnotthe

    particle.Logically,“nottheparticle”meanstheinverseoftheparticle;therefore,

    outsideoftheboundaryonthespatialaxisrepresents3-Dspace(s)andonthe

    temporalaxis,itrepresentstime(t).

    Figure1

    Thismayseemlikeanunconventionalwayofusingarectangularcoordinate

    systembecausetheunitsforenergyaredifferentfromtheunitsofspaceandtime.

    Butwedothesamethingwithvectorsthatrepresentmotionthathasmagnitude

    anddirection.Itisasuperpositionofrelationships.Regardlessofwhatunitsof

    measurementsareassigned,therelationshipsremainthesame.The“outside”

    domaincorrespondstorelativisticrelationshipsandthe“inside”domain

  • 6

    correspondstoquantumrelationships.Thesetwodomainsareoftenmixed

    mathematically,forexampleaunitofpowerisaunitofenergyperunittimeor

    𝑃 = !!.InFigure1,thisusestheinsideunitofenergyasthenumeratorandthe

    outsideunitasthedenominatorandtheresultistheslopeofthediagonalline.Orif

    yourotatetheaxeswithtemporalunitsastheverticalandspatialunitsasthe

    horizontal,theslopewouldrepresentaunitofforce,sinceforceisaunitofenergy

    perunitdistanceor𝐹 = !!,whereswouldrepresentaunitofmeasureinone

    dimension–thedirectionoftheforce.(Halliday,ResnickandWalker1993)

    AsitisinFigure1,theslopeofthediagonallineis!!= 𝑐ontheoutsideand

    ! !!!= !

    !ontheinside.InHartreenaturalunits,𝑐 = 1isthespeedoflightand!

    != 𝛼is

    thefinestructureconstant,whichisconsideredbymosttobeafundamental

    constantinnature(Nair,etal.2008).Inthegeneralrelativityframework,itisa

    fundamentalphysicalconstantcharacterizingthestrengthoftheelectromagnetic

    interactionbetweenelementarychargedparticles.Butithasmultiplephysical

    interpretations(seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant)and

    someevensuggestthatitmaynotbestrictlyconstant(Webb,etal.1998).According

    tothemodelpresentedhere,itissimplyacluethattheexpressionofthequantum

    domainisthemirrorimageoftherelativisticdomain.

    Presentingspaceandtimeinthiswayallowsseveralotherrelationshipsto

    fallinplaceaswell,asshowninFigure2,wherethesubscriptin𝐸! standsfor

    deBroglie,todistinguishitfrom𝐸! ,whichisrestenergyand𝐸! ,whichistotal

    energy.(ReproducedfromFigure6of(StJohn,TheHolomorphicProcess-

    UnderstandingtheHolographicNatureofRealityasaMetamorphicProcess2018))

  • 7

    Figure2

    Noticethatthekineticenergytermisrepresentedbythepartofthetotal

    energyvectorthatliesoutsideofthe“particle”boundary.Itisareflectionofthefact

    thataquantumparticleisaunitofenergy,geographicallyexpressedintheenergy

    domain,whichissuperimposedovertherelativisticdomain(sandt,notlabeledin

    thisfigure).Inotherwords,aparticle,oranyphysicalobject,canbeperceivedasan

    independentobject–or–asanobjectthatisinmotionrelativetoanythingelseinthe

    universethatismovingrelativetoit.Andthetworepresentationscanbe

    superimposedbyapplyingtheappropriatescalingfactororcoordinate

    transformation.TheLorentzfactor,𝛾servesthispurposehere.

    Figure1andFigure2werepresentedtovalidatethismodeloffrequency

    withitsinverses(spaceandtime).Inordertouseittounderstandthenatureof

    time,theouter(relativistic)rectangulardomainwillbescaledasusual,seeFigure3,

    withlinearincrementsoftime,andtheinner(frequency)domainwillbescaledwith

    incrementsofinversetime.ThusFigure3isatwodimensionalrepresentationofa

    torus,withthequantumdomainastheregioninsidethecircle–theeventreference

    or“eventhorizon”inblackholelingo–andtherelativisticdomainontheoutside.

    Theverticalaxisstillrepresents3-Dspace,butwe’refocusingontimeinthisfigure,

    sothelabelsareleftoffinthefigure.Allfourquadrantsareshownbecausetheinner

    domainwillbeidentifiedasapolardomaininthenextsection.

  • 8

    Figure3

    Historically,physicistshavetaken𝑡 = 0tobealegitimatestartingpointfor

    measurement.ButaccordingtoFigure3,𝑡 = 0correspondsto!!= ∞oraninfinite

    frequency.Obviouslythereisnosuchthingasinfinitefrequency,sousing𝑡 = 0asa

    referencepointforlinearlyscaledmotioncreatesaproblem.Theproblemisthat

    regardlessofwhatunitsofmeasureyouchoose,oneunitisoneunit.Andifthe

    fundamentalunitofmotionisaunitoffrequency,thenunitsofspaceandtimemust

    berepresentedasinversesbetween0and1.Inotherwords,ameasurementofone

    unitisatruemeasurementsousing𝑡 = 1asaneventreferencemakesthemodelfit

    reality.Theproblemwithback-projectingthatmeasurementtozeroisthatit

    stretchesthetruth,andtryingtoforcerealitytofitthemodelcreatesawarped

    interpretationofreality.Withoutageometricmodel,mathdoesn’trevealthis

    problem.DifferentialCalculusforexample,handlesthisstretchingoperationby

    shrinkingthepolardomainintermsoftimedowntoapoint:thelim!→!∆!∆!,andthen

    definesthatusinglinearunitsofmeasureasinstantaneousspeedinonedirection.

    Formostpracticalpurposesthisisfineandveryusefulbecauseitisaccuratewithin

    theprecisionlimitsofmeasurement.

  • 9

    Butquantumphysicsisallaboutthepartinsidethelimitas∆𝑡 → 0and

    ∆𝑠 → 0.Whenitwasbeingdeveloped,NielsBohrformulatedthe“correspondence

    principle”,whichrequiresthatthebehaviorofsystemsdescribedinthenew

    quantummodelmustreducetothesameprovenresultsastheclassicalmodel.But

    thentheyhadtoprovideinterpretationsthatdidnotcorrespondtorealityaswe

    knowitinthe“realworld”.Theyacceptedthatthequantumworldwasjustweird.

    Andphysicistsworkingwithspecialandgeneralrelativityhaveacceptedthesame

    “copout”:thatthecosmosisjustwarpedandweird.

    Toanengineer,theproblemisthatphysicistsarenotconcernedwiththereal

    worldandtherefore,mistakethemapfortheterritory.Engineersrecognizethe

    warpingeffectasanartifactthatiscausedbymapping,whichisarequiredpartof

    anengineer’scurriculumbecauseitisastandardmethodusedforsolvingboundary

    valueproblems.Conformalmapspreserverelationshipsintheformofsizeand

    attitude(senseofangles)fromonedomaintoanother.(Kreyszig1979,pg.599)In

    thiscase,theslopeofthediagonallineinthefigureisaconformalprojectionofa

    unitinthedimensionperpendiculartothespace-timeplane,i.e.themotion

    dimension.Therefore,themodelpresentedhereiscalledtheSpace-Time-Motionor

    STMmodel.(StJohn2018)

    Sothequantumpoint,lim∆!→!∆!→!isjustthecircleyoumightdrawonaplaneto

    representthethirdaxiscomingoutofthepage.Incontrolsystemdesign,engineers

    makegreateffortstoensurethatcontrolsystemsavoidapproachingsingularpoints,

    like𝑡 = 0called“poles”becausetheyrepresentconditionsofmaximuminstability

    inthesystem.(Ogata1970,pg.23)That,Isubmit,istheproblemwithmodern

    theoreticalphysics.Themodelsthatheldtimeasaprimaryfundamentalunit

    becameunstableandtheback-projection“blewup”ina“cataclysmicexplosion10-

    20billionyearsago”,asMichioKakuputit(Kaku1993)becausetheyassumethat

    therewasabeginningtotheuniverse.Butifthereisnosuchthingaszerotimeor

    zerospace,i.e.nobeginningtotheuniverse,theneventhoughrealeventscanbefit

    intothemodel,themodelstilldoesn’tfitreality.

  • 10

    Ontheotherhand,frequencyisequivalenttoarealunitofenergy.Spatial

    frequencyandtemporalfrequencyareexplicitunits,justlikespaceandtime,but

    neitheroneisseparatedintothreedimensions,sotheyworktogetheraslinear

    relations,commonlyusedasFourierandLaplacetransforms.Spaceandtimestill

    workasscalesthatcanbemanipulatedanywayyouwant,tobuildsymbolicmodels

    thatareappropriateforspecificapplications.Butextendingthelinearscalesbackto

    theoriginbrushesoverthemeaningofthequantumunitofmotion.Thatunitisa

    unitofvibration–akernelinformation.Andthatinformationreflectsthemeaningof

    time.

    Soratherthanstretchingorbrushingoverit,wewilluseapolarcoordinate

    systemandcorrelatethepolardomainwithquantumspaceandtherectangular

    domainwithrelativisticspace.Thenwecorrelatevectorsinrelativisticspacewith

    phasorsinquantumspace.Thebenefitofthisapproachisthatitprovides

    interpretationsthatcorrespondtoprovenresultsinbothquantumandrelativistic

    models,describedin(StJohn2018),aswellastherealworld,i.e.itwillbeshown

    belowthattherelationshipsderivedfromthisapproachproducethegoldenratio,

    whichisevidentinthestructureoflivingorganisms.

    PhaseVectorsandPhasorDiagrams

    Vectorsaredefinedbytheirmagnitudeanddirectionandarenormally

    superimposedoverrectangularcoordinatesystems.“Phasors”asshowninFigure4

    arephasevectors,i.e.theydefinetheirangleasmeasuredfromareference(usually

    thehorizontalaxis)inapolarcoordinatesystem.Soratherthanscalingtheinside

    partofthetaxisas!!,phasorsuseangularfrequency,𝜔.Theyarecommonlyusedin

    electricalengineeringtorepresentwavesofalternatingcurrentfortransmissionof

    powerorradiosignals.Intheseapplications,phasorsalwayshaveconstant

    magnitude,like𝐸,theradiusofthecircleinFigure1,sotheyaremoreusefulfor

    constantamplitudewaves.Here,theportionofthevectorinsidethecircleinFigure

    2thatrepresentsaparticle“atrest”isrepresentedasthesolidphasorinFigure4.

    Theendpointofthisdiscussionwillbetoillustratewhatthistypeofcoordinate

  • 11

    systemrevealsastimepasses(thegoldenratio),butwashiddenwhenthequantum

    domainwasignoredandthushidden.

    Aphasordiagramonlyneedsoneaxistoscaleitsmagnitudeandprovidea

    referencefortheangleofthephasor,butinthisapplicationweneedboththe

    quantumandrelativisticsystemsbecausewhateverhappensinonedomainalso

    happensintheotherandwewillbeabletojumpbackanforthasneeded.

    Figure4

    Eventhoughenergyappearstobecollapsedandlocalizedintoaparticle,a

    particleisstillinmotionrelativetoeverythingelseintheuniverse,soitmustbe

    expressedasaspatiotemporalunit.Thiscanbeaccomplishedbyseparatingthe

    phasorinFigure4intoaspatialcomponent(atanangle𝑘𝑟totheleftdashed

    phasor)andatemporalcomponent(atanangle𝜔𝑡totherightdashedphasor).The

    differenceangle𝜃 = (𝑘𝑟 − 𝜔𝑡)representsthephasedifferencebetweenthetwo.As

    timepasses,thesetwoexpressasseparatewaves,but𝜃 = 0representsthephasor

    thatremainsconstanttorepresentthesolidphasor(nottheonesthataredashed

    lines),collinearwiththerelativisticvector𝐸! inFigure2.

    Thephaseangleisthesameexpressionusedastheargumentofatransverse

    wave,suchas𝑦 𝑥, 𝑡 = 𝑦!sin(𝑘𝑥 − 𝜔𝑡),where𝑦!isthemaximumamplitudeofthe

    wave,𝑘 = !!and𝜔 = !!

    !.Butinthatcase,themodelisusedtoplotthewavemoving

    eitherinspaceorintimewhiletheotherisheldconstant.Aphasordiagramallows

  • 12

    thembothtochangetogetherasinversesofeachother.SoonephasorinFigure4

    mustrotatetotheleftastheotherrotatestotherightatthesameconstantangular

    rate.Again,thisleavestheoriginaldiagonalphasor,thetotalenergyofthequantum

    particle,toremainunchanged.

    Astheleftvectorbeginstorotateleftandgetahigherslope !!inreference

    totherelativisticframe,(asshowninFigure4),thiswouldbeinterpretedtomeanit

    isincreasingspeedandsincethevectorcomponentprojectedontothespaceaxisis

    gettinglarger,thatsuggeststhattheparticleisgettingbiggerordiffusing.Similarly,

    therightvectorprojectsasifitwereslowingdownandgettingsmalleror

    collapsing.Sothiswouldmeanthattheparticleisbeginningtoseparateitselfinto

    aninnersphereandanoutersphere.Inreality,onewouldarguethatthisisrelated

    totheHeisenberguncertaintyprinciple,andnothingishappeningtotheactual

    particle.It’sthemodelthatmustchangeinordertorepresentchangethatresults

    fromthepassageoftime.Andsincetheappearanceofthephysicalparticledoesn’t

    change,thespatialpartoftheexpressionhastoberenormalized,moment-by-

    moment,whereasthetemporalpartdoesnot.Thequestionis,whatdefinesthat

    “moment”.Thatiswherethegoldenratioappearsinthemodel.

    Result:TheGoldenRatio Thereisapointinthetwophasors’rotationwherethetwoslopesreacha

    veryspecialvalue.Figure5showsthisfortheleftphasor(kr)andFigure6forthe

    rightphasor(𝜔𝑡).Thatspecialvalueisthepointwheretheslope,whichisaratio,

    reachesthegoldenratio,∅ = 1.618… What’ssospecialaboutthegoldenratio?Itis

    thesolutiontotherelation∅ = 1+ !∅.If∅istheslopeoftheleftphasor,thismeans

    thatifthereferencescaleshiftsbyoneunitoneitheraxis,i.e.onemomentintime

    andonemomentinspace,thentherotatedphasorwiththeslope,∅,canbereplaced

    byanewphasor(shownasphasor3)withthesameslopeasphasor2,exceptas

    referredtotheoutsidereferenceframe(justascand!!wereshowninFigure1)and

    shiftedbyoneunitasshowninbothFigure5andFigure6.

  • 13

    Andthereisa“twist”:Sincetheangleofeachphasorisfoundbytakingthe

    arctan(theoppositeovertheadjacentsidesoftherighttriangle),itiseasyto

    calculatethatthetwonewphasorsarerotated(ergotwisted)by13.28oinopposite

    directionsascomparedtotheoldvector,phasor1.

    Asmentionedabove,justbeforetheshift,the“size”ofthe“newparticle”in

    theunshiftedreferenceframe(theprojectionofphasor2onthespaceaxisinboth

    figures)isdifferentfromtheoriginalparticle(phasor1).Theprojectionoftheleft

    (spatial)phasorinFigure5suggeststhattheparticleisgrowing,butbecauseit

    doesn’tappeartobephysicallylarger,thescaleofthespaceaxishastobe

    renormalized.Ineffect,the“new”phasor,phasor3,seemstohavecollapsedalong

    withthenewrenormalizedcoordinatesystem.Sowecanimaginethattheparticle

    expandsfora“goldenmoment”thencollapsesbacktotheoriginalsize.Orwecould

    saythattherectangularcoordinatesystemrotatedtoputphasor3backat45!

    givingtheparticleitscharacteristicangularmomentumorspin.Whenthat

    happens,thetemporalphasormustalsorotatetotherighttoaccountforthe13.28o

    tokeep𝜃 = 0.Theresultisthesameparticlethatcontainsa“module”ofinverse-

    temporalinformation,i.e.itisafrequencymodulatedunitofinformation(what

    NassimHarameincallsaPlanckunitthatmakesuptheunifiedfield).

  • 14

    Figure5

    Figure6

    Soevenifnothingphysicalabouttheparticleitselfchanged,theobserver’s

    perceptionchangedbecausetheparticleappearstohaverotatedinspaceandtime.

    Wesensethemotioninspacebecauseithasmomentum,and“pulls”the

    surroundingspaceinward,whichwemeasureasgravity.Andwesensethatithas

  • 15

    movedintime,butweinterpretittobeunchangingintime.Ratherthanthinking

    thattheparticlechangedintime,wethinkthattimehaschangedindependentofthe

    particle.Andthatisaperfectlylegitimateinterpretationformostpracticalpurposes.

    Butifthatistrue,wheredidthetimego?

    Itwentinwardasamomentofinversetimeanditsreflectionwentoutward

    asournormalnotionofamomentintime:i.e.theclassic“arrowoftime”.Because

    thespaceaxiswasrenormalizedbutthetemporalaxiswasnot,theoldtemporal

    phasorstillappearstorepresentasmallerparticle(projectionofphasor3onthe

    spaceaxis),whichwecouldimagineobjectivelyasan“event-particle”(atermfrom

    ProcessPhilosophy(Whitehead1929))orqbitofinformationcollapseinsidetoward

    theinfinitesimalcenterofthephysicalparticle.Thissuggeststhatatorusisabetter

    modelthanaspheretorepresentquantumparticles.Anditmightcorrespondto

    energylevelsthatrepresentelectronorbitalsinthecurrentmodelsofphysics,but

    thathasnotbeenverified.Andifthismodelrepresentsalivingbeing,itsuggests

    thattheinner“event-particle”mightbeassociatedwithourmemoryandwithour

    geneticcodestoredasquantumunits,twistedinthehelicalformofDNA,being

    programmedinrealtime.

    Keepinmindthattheprojectionsonthespaceandtimeaxesdonot

    representtotalenergyoftheparticle,butratherwavesinspaceandtime.Butthe

    differenceinphaseanglesbetweenthenewandoldparticlecanberepresentedasa

    differentwavethatmodulatestheparticlefrequency.Andasawave,itisaunitof

    information.ThissupportstheideathatperhapsInformationTheoryprovidesa

    betterapproachtounderstandingrealitythantheStandardModelofParticle

    Physics.(DaviesandGregersen2010)

    Itisalsoimportanttonotethatthegoldenratiocanbewrittenintheform

    ∅! = 1+ ∅.Sothisreferstheslopebacktotheinsidedomainoftheoriginal

    referenceframeandpresentstheoldenergytermasbeingsquared.Inclassical

    wavetheory,thesquareofawaveamplitudereferstointensity,i.e.theamountof

    energythatpassesthroughaunitareaperpendiculartothewavedirectionintime.

    Inthiscase,thatdirectionisinward.

  • 16

    Thegoldenratiohasbeenknownforcenturiesandusedinartand

    architecturebecauseapplyingittodetermineproportionsforfiguresandbuildings

    createsaestheticallypleasingresults.Anditappearsasacommonpatterninleaves,

    plants,fruitsandflowers(veryobviousinpineapplesandpinecones)aswellas

    seashells(forexamplethenautilus)andanimals,includinghumans.Clearlythe

    goldenratioismuchmorethanatoolforart.AccordingtotheSTMmodelpresented

    here,itistherelationshipthatshapeseveryfiberofourbeingandeverymomentof

    spaceandtime.Andasprojectionsoflife,weliterallyresonatewithit.

    Conclusion Thisprocess,whichIcalltheholomorphicprocess,bywhichtheunifiedfield

    separatesintotwodomains,projectsitselfinwardandoutward,reflectsonitself(at

    thepointthatitsmotionreachesthegoldenratio)andreunifies,ishowthree

    dimensionsofspacearemixedwithonedimensionoftimetomakespacetimeseem

    tobesomekindofweirdphenomenondifferentthanenergywheninfactitisjust

    information-modulatedenergy,whichiscalled“truth”sinceitactuallyhappened.If

    spaceisrepresentedasasphereonthree-dimensionalcoordinatesystem,thentime

    isjusttheinward-outwarddirection.Itisassimpletounderstandasconsideringthe

    radiusofaspheretobeafourthdimension,exceptthateachspherecapturesthe

    implicitprocessasinformation.Wejusthappentoscaleitbyastandardclock.

    There’snothingspecialaboutstandardclocktime.Itwasameasureofmotionthat

    wasrecordedandisnow“clocked”asareferenceattheNationalInstituteof

    StandardsandTechnology(NIST).Soitiseffectivelyanointedandtreatedasbeinga

    sacredunit.

    Thelogicaltwist(thinkingthattimeitselfisdifferentthaninversefrequency)

    andstrictdefinitionoftimeasanunchangingunit,objectifiesandhidesthemeaning

    oftime,becauseitignorestheconvolutionprocess.Convolutionmeansthatspace

    andtimeformaconvolutedwhole,i.e.theinformationpresentontheoutsideis

    continuouslyconvolved,withtheparticle.Thisprocessshapestheparticleintoa

    formthatcanbeperceivedatthemacroscopiclevelasbeingatrest.It’stheformor

  • 17

    shapethatimpliestheinformationanddictatesitsbehavior.Thisisexactlyhow

    anatomicalinformationgetsinfusedorimpliedinanx-rayorholographicfilm.But,

    whereastheinformationinahologrammustbedeconvolvedbyilluminatingitwith

    anotherlaser,theinformationinaquantumparticleisautomaticallydeconvolved

    byrelativemotion(itsbehavior).

    Oneexample,ofhowrelativemotiondeconvolvesinformation,was

    demonstratedbyAlbertEinsteinwhenheusedstatisticalanalysisofBrownian

    motion(randommotionofdustparticles)toprovethattheirmotionimpliedthe

    existenceofformswenowknowasmolecules.Inhis1956paper,InvestigationsOn

    TheTheoryoftheBrownianMovement,hehypothesizedthatthemovementofdust-

    particlesonthesurfaceofasphericaldropofliquidwasthevisiblemacroprocess

    impliedbyrandomcollisionswithmolecules.Hedevelopedanequationforthe

    distributionofthenumberofparticlesperunitvolumeasafunctionoftime(t)and

    position(x).Hesaid,“wewillcalculatethedistributionoftheparticlesatatime

    𝑡 + 𝜏fromthedistributionatthetimet.”Thenhesolvedforthemomentofthe

    distribution.Aswithanystatisticaldistribution,the“moment”providesuswitha

    singlemeasureofacollectivebehavior,deducedfromtheshapeofthedistribution.

    Thatmeansthattheshapeevolvesbyconvolvingthefunction,definedbythe

    implicitnatureofthemicrosystem,withtime.Byexpandingandrearrangingit,he

    effectivelydeconvolveditandsolvedforthediffusioncoefficient.Thisdeconvolved

    expressionwasthenverifiedbyexperimentalobservationofdustparticles.

    Aseachmomentoftimepasses,thequantumbitsofinformationthatare

    present–inthepresent–(onthesurfaceofeveryquantumparticle)collapseinward

    andbecomeinfusedintotheparticleasbitwiserecordings,collectivelycalled“the

    past”.Soaunitofinverse-timeisinterpretedasa“momentofthepast”–asingle

    “logical”quantumbitofinformationstoredinthree“physical”dimensions.

    Collective,itformsafour-bitqbit.Aspartofalargerquantumcomputer,itself-

    programs,self-correctsandrunsitself,whichisanideathatiscurrentlybeing

    studied.(Lloydd’Arbelofn.d.)(Lloyd2007)(Almheiri,DongandHarlow2015)

    (Wolchover2019)Theoutward-pointingvectorsimplycorrespondstothe

    mysteriousarrowoftime.

  • 18

    Themostprofoundimplicationofthisisthatallphysicalmatter,includinga

    livingorganism,isrecordingeverymomentintime.Soweareareflectionofevery

    event,actionandwordthatweexperienceincludingthosethatwegenerate.These

    interpretationsprovidesabridgebetweenphysics,asaphysicalscience,andthelife

    sciences,whichmustincludeinformationfromtheenvironmentthatconvolveswith

    particlestoallowlifetogrow,changeandadapt.

    Bibliography• Almheiri,Ahmed,XiDong,andDanielHarlow."Bulklocalityandquantum

    errorcorrectioninAdS/CFT."JournalofHighEnergyPhysics2015,no.163(2015).

    • Barbour,Julian.TheEndofTime:TheNextRevolutioninPhysics.Kindle.OxfordUniversityPress,1999.

    • Bohm,David.WholenessandtheImplicateOrder.1980.• Burtt,E.A.TheMetaphysicalFoundationsofModernScience.Mineola,NY:

    DoverPublications,2003.• Chappell,JamesM.,JohnG.Hartnett,NicolangeloIannella,AzharIqbal,and

    DerekAbbott."TimeAsaGeometricPropertyofSpace."FrontiersinPhysics;MathematicalandStatisticalPhysics,Nov2016.

    • Davies,Paul,andNielsGregersen,.InformationandtheNatureofRealityFromPhysicstoMetaphysics.CambridgeUniversityPress,2010.

    • Halliday,David,RobertResnick,andJearlWalker.FundamentalsofPhysics.4th.NewYork:JohnWileyandSonsInc,1993.

    • Hawking,Stephen.ABriefHistoryofTime;FromtheBigBangtoBlackHoles.NewYork:BantamBooks,1990.

    • Kaku,Michio.QuantumFieldTheory,AModernIntroduction.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,1993.

    • Kreyszig,Erwin.AdvancedEngineeringMathematics.4th.NewYork:JohnWileyandSons,1979.

    • Lloydd’Arbelof,Seth."Universeasquantumcomputer."https://cds.cern.ch/.https://cds.cern.ch/record/412531/files/9912088.pdf(accessedOct20,2020).

    • Lloyd,Seth.ProgrammingtheUniverse:AQuantumComputerScientistTakesontheCosmos.2007.

    • Muller,RichardA.Now:Thephysicsoftime.W.W.Norton&Company,2016.• Musser,George."WhatisSpacetime."ScientificAmerican,June1,2018.• Nair,R.R.,etal."FineStructureConstantDefinesVisualTransparencyof

    Graphene."(Science)320(June2008).

  • 19

    • Ogata,Katsuhiko.ModernControlEngineering.EnglewoodCliffs,NewJersey:Prentice-Hall,Inc,1970.

    • Smolin,Lee.TheTroubleWithPhysics.Boston:HoughtonMifflinCompany,2006.

    • —.TimeReborn:FromtheCrisisinPhysicstotheFutureoftheUniverse.Kindle.HoughtonMifflinHarcourt,2013.

    • StJohn,TheodoreJ."TheHolomorphicProcess.UnderstandingtheHolographicNatureofRealityasaMetamorphicProcess."ArchivesofPhysicsResearch9,no.2(2018):17-44.

    • StJohn,TheodoreJ."TheHolomorphicProcess-UnderstandingtheHolographicNatureofRealityasaMetamorphicProcess."ArchivesofPhysicsResearch9,no.2(2018):17-44.

    • Webb,JohnK.,VictorV.Flambaum,ChristopherW.Churchill,MichaelJ.Drinkwater,andJohnD.Barrow."ASearchforTimeVariationoftheFineStructureConstant."arXiv:astro-ph/9803165v4,1998.

    • Whitehead,AlfredNorth.ProcessandReality.Edinburgh:SimonandSchuster,1929.

    • Wolchover,Natalie."HowSpaceandTimeCouldBeaQuantumError-CorrectingCode."QuantaMagazine,Jan3,2019.