63
KYCCS Geologic Criteria for Western Kentucky Permanent CO 2 Storage (Saline reservoir test) Dave Williams and Rick Bowersox Kentucky Geological Survey

Geologic Criteria for Western Kentucky Permanent CO … XX XX XXXX XX XX XX X X XX XXXXX X X X X X X X X X XX X XXX X X X XXX XXX ... The Mt. Simon Sandstone (basal sand) is the saline-water

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

KYCCS

Geologic Criteria for Western Kentucky

Permanent CO2Storage

(Saline reservoir test)

Dave Williams and Rick Bowersox

Kentucky Geological Survey

KYCCS

House Bill 1

“…the research shall include the drilling of deep wells in both coal fields (Illinois and Appalachian) in Kentucky, and performing the analysis necessary to estimate the potential for enhanced oil and gas recovery, enhanced coalbedmethane recovery, or permanent storage of sequestration of carbon dioxide.”

$5 million appropriated to research use and storage of CO2 in Kentucky

KYCCS

Storage (sequestration) research to build on

Past researchDOE-sponsored research in Kentucky

• MIDCARB

• Phase 1- Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP)

• Phase 1- Midwest (Illinois Basin) Geological Carbon Sequestration (MGCS) Consortium

GOEP-sponsored research in Kentucky• Kentucky’s FutureGen proposal

KYCCS

Storage (sequestration) research to build on

Current researchDOE-sponsored research in Kentucky

GOEP-sponsored research in Kentucky• Kentucky’s industrial plant site bank

• Phase 2- Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP)

• Phase 2- Midwest (Illinois Basin) Geological Carbon Sequestration (MGCS) Consortium

• Phase 2- Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (SECARB)

KYCCS

Storage (sequestration) research to build on

From this research we have gathered some geologic background to aid in planning a test for deep CO2 storage in western Kentucky:

• Minimum depths for miscible injection

• Principle reservoir targets and seals

• Other potentially limiting factors

• Wisdom from similar tests within the DOE-sponsored projects

KYCCS

Minimum storage depths

The minimum depth for miscible CO2 storage (sequestration) is determined by the properties of CO2

Supercritical fluid10,000

5,000

1,000

500

100

50

10

1

5

0.1 0 100 -100

Solid (dry ice)

Liquid

Gas

Typical Reservoir Conditions in

Midwest

Temperature (F)

Pres

sure

(psi

a) Critical Point

(87.8ºF,1,071 psia)

Graph from MRCSP Phase 1 Final Report (Wickstrom and others, 2004)

Minimum storage depths

KYCCS

At increased pressure and temperature, CO2 behaves as a super-critical fluid (has properties of a liquid and gas) and is reduced in volume 250 times.

Supercritical fluid10,000

5,000

1,000

500

100

50

10

1

5

0.1 0 100 -100

Solid (dry ice)

Liquid

Gas

Typical Reservoir Conditions in

Midwest

Temperature (F)

Pres

sure

(psi

a) Critical Point

(87.8ºF,1,071 psia)

Minimum storage depths

KYCCS

Because future large-scale CO2 storage will need supercritical conditions, our deep well needs to test reservoirs at depths where any injected CO2 would be at supercritical conditions

Supercritical fluid10,000

5,000

1,000

500

100

50

10

1

5

0.1 0 100 -100

Solid (dry ice)

Liquid

Gas

Typical Reservoir Conditions in

Midwest

Temperature (F)

Pres

sure

(psi

a) Critical Point

(87.8ºF,1,071 psia)

Minimum storage depths

KYCCS

Research by the MRCSP and MGCS indicate that the critical point for CO2 in the Midwest and Kentucky should occur at a depth of ~2,500 ft

Rapid density change

From MRCSP Phase 1 Final Report (Wickstromand others, 2004)

Kentucky data at minimum storage depths

KYCCS

Existing well data in western Kentucky at depths greater than 2,500 ft

2,500-4,0004,000-5,0005,000-6,0006,000-8,000>8,000

Well depths (ft)Faults

Kentucky data at minimum storage depths

KYCCS

Western Kentucky Coal Field and the existing well data at depths greater than 2,500 ft

2,500-4,0004,000-5,0005,000-6,0006,000-8,000>8,000

Well depths (ft)

Western Kentucky Coal Field

Faults

Kentucky data below minimum storage depths

KYCCS

Well data decreases at depths > 5,000 ft

5,000-6,0006,000-8,000>8,000

Well depths (ft) Faults

Kentucky data below minimum storage depths

KYCCS

Western Kentucky Coal Field and deep wells

5,000-6,0006,000-8,000>8,000

Well depths (ft)

Western Kentucky Coal Field

Faults

Western Kentucky Coal Field

• Also, few core or rock samples at depth

Kentucky data below minimum storage depths

KYCCS

XXXX

XXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXX

XX

XX

XXXXXXXX

X

XX

X

XXX

XX

XX

XXXXXXX

XX

X

X

XXXXX

X

X

X

XXX

XXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXX

XXX

XXX

X

XX

XXX

X

X

XX

XXX

XXXXX

XXXXXXXX

XXXX

XXX

XXX

XX

XXXXX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XXX

XXXXXXXX

XXXXX

XXX

XXXXX

XX XXX X XXXXX X X XXXXXXXXX

XXX

XX

XX

XXX

X X XX XX X XX X XXX XX

XXX

XXXXXX

XXX

XX

XX

X

XXX

XX

XX

XX

X

XX

XXXX

X

X

XXXXXX

XX

XXX

XX XXXX

XXXX

XX

X

XXXXX

X XXXXXXXX XXXX

XXXXX

XXX

X XXXXX

XX

X

XXXXXXX

XXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXX

XX

X

X

XX

XX

XXX

XXXX

X

XXXXX XX X

XX

XXXX

XXXX

XX

XXX

XX

XXXX

XX

X

XXX

XXXXXXXX

XXXXX

XX

XXX

X

XX

X

XXX

X

XX

X

XXXXXXX

XXXX

XXXXXX

XXX

XXXXX

X

XX

XXXXXXX

X

XX

XX

XXX

XXXX

XXXXXXXX

XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXX

XXXXX XXXXXX

XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX

KGS also has access to seismic data to aid in interpretation of the deep subsurface

Seismic lines

Miles0 25 50

Draft map

Western Kentucky structure

KYCCS

Our site evaluation needs to consider that there are at least three distinct geologic areas in the Western Kentucky Coal Field: the Rough Creek Graben, and north or south of the graben

Rough Creek Graben

North of RCG

South of RCG

Rough Creek Fault System

Pennyrile Fault System

Western Kentucky Coal Field

Western Kentucky structure

KYCCS

There are major differences in depths to potential target horizons in and out of Kentucky’s grabens

Depth to the Precambrian basement

Western Kentucky Coal

Field

Draft map

Deep rock units in western Kentucky

KYCCS

Previous research has established which rock units in the deep subsurface are possible saline reservoirs and which are possible sealing or containment intervals

Metamorphic and igneous rocks (mostly seal)

Sink or seal (depends on location)

Unconformity

Caprock-containment interval

Potential CO2 sinks/ reservoirs

Rock units

Black River Gp(High Bridge Gp)

Joachim Dol

St. Peter Ss

Plattin Fm

Pecatonica Fm

Lexington Ls

Maquoketa Gp

Wells Creek-Dutchtown Fm

Middle

Beekmantown Fm

Copper Ridge Dol.

Lower

Granite-RhyoliteComplex

Upper

Middle

Lower

Upper

?

Ord

ovic

ian

Cam

bria

n

Proterozoic

?

System Series

Knox

Gp.

Gunter Ss

Mount Simon Ss

Eau Claire Fm

?

Deep rock units in western Kentucky

KYCCS

Known “regional” saline reservoirs at depth are:

• Mount Simon Sandstone

• St. Peter Sandstone

Metamorphic and igneous rocks (mostly seal)

Sink or seal (depends on location)

Unconformity

Caprock-containment interval

Potential CO2 sinks/ reservoirs

Rock units

Black River Gp(High Bridge Gp)

Joachim Dol

St. Peter Ss

Plattin Fm

Pecatonica Fm

Lexington Ls

Maquoketa Gp

Wells Creek-Dutchtown Fm

Middle

Beekmantown Fm

Copper Ridge Dol.

Lower

Granite-RhyoliteComplex

Upper

Middle

Lower

Upper

?

Ord

ovic

ian

Cam

bria

n

Proterozoic

?

System Series

Knox

Gp.

Gunter Ss

Mount Simon Ss

Eau Claire Fm

?

Deep rock units in western Kentucky

KYCCS

Also, some units may contain both sealing intervals and saline reservoirs:

Knox Group

Metamorphic and igneous rocks (mostly seal)

Sink or seal (depends on location)

Unconformity

Caprock-containment interval

Potential CO2 sinks/ reservoirs

Rock units

Black River Gp(High Bridge Gp)

Joachim Dol

St. Peter Ss

Plattin Fm

Pecatonica Fm

Lexington Ls

Maquoketa Gp

Wells Creek-Dutchtown Fm

Middle

Beekmantown Fm

Copper Ridge Dol.

Lower

Granite-RhyoliteComplex

Upper

Middle

Lower

Upper

?

Ord

ovic

ian

Cam

bria

n

Proterozoic

?

System Series

Knox

Gp.

Gunter Ss

Mount Simon Ss

Eau Claire Fm

?

Other local reservoirs may also occur and may need to be evaluated

Deep rock units in western Kentucky

KYCCS

Just as important in an injection project are the containing (sealing) units:

Metamorphic and igneous rocks (mostly seal)

Sink or seal (depends on location)

Unconformity

Caprock-containment interval

Potential CO2 sinks/ reservoirs

Rock units

Black River Gp(High Bridge Gp)

Joachim Dol

St. Peter Ss

Plattin Fm

Pecatonica Fm

Lexington Ls

Maquoketa Gp

Wells Creek-Dutchtown Fm

Middle

Beekmantown Fm

Copper Ridge Dol.

Lower

Granite-RhyoliteComplex

Upper

Middle

Lower

Upper

?

Ord

ovic

ian

Cam

bria

n

Proterozoic

?

System Series

Knox

Gp.

Gunter Ss

Mount Simon Ss

Eau Claire Fm

?

• Eau Claire Fm

• Wells Creek and High Bridge carbonates

• Maquoketa Shale (primary seal)

• Devonian Shale (ultimate seal)

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

KYCCS

The Mt. Simon Sandstone (basal sand) is the saline-water bearing unit (saline reservoir) being targeted for CO2 storage in much of the Midwest

Map from MGCS data

Mt. Simon thickness

2,490

0

Thickness (ft)

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

KYCCSMap from MGCS data

Mt. Simon thickness

2,490

0

Thickness (ft)

Gibson Co.Mt. Simon Class 1 well sites (based on EPA UIC data)

The Mt. Simon is already used for industrial waste injection in other states

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

KYCCS

Mt. Simon thickness

Map from MGCS data

East BendDuke Energy-

MRCSP

FutureGenMattoon

OhioTuscarawas Co.

MountaineerAEP-BattelleBasal sand tests for

CO2 injection

Planned Mt. Simon CO2 injection tests

2,490

0

Thickness (ft)

There are also recently completed and planned deep tests for CO2 storage in the Mt. Simon and similar basal sands

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

KYCCS

• At depths of 14,500 to 6,000 in western Kentucky

• Few well data. Mostly inferred from seismic data

Mt. Simon structure

.

.

..

.

CALDWELL

Miles0 25 50Well

Fault

>-14,000-13,000 to -13,999-12,000 to -12,999 -11,000 to -11,999 -10,000 to -10,999-9,000 to -9,999-8,000 to -8,999-7,000 to -7,999-6,000 to -6,999-5,000 to -5,999-4,000 to -4,999<-4000

Sea level datum

Draft map

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

KYCCS

• Restricted to area north of Rough Creek faults

• Thins to southeast

Mt. Simon thickness

.

.

..

.

.

Miles0 25 50

> 800 ft800-700 ft700-600 ft600-500 ft500-400 ft400-300 ft300-200 ft200-100 ft100-0 ft

Well dataDraft map

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

KYCCS

Mt. Simon,Exxon-Bell Well,

Webster County, Ky.

EXXON MINERALS CO, USABELL, JIMMY

14,340

13000

14000

GR - Caliper Bulk Density

• Thickness: 750 ft

• Depth: 13,490 ft

• Poor reservoir quality

• Eau Claire faulted out?

Location

Depth (ft)KY deep well example:

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

KYCCS

Three tests of Mt. Simon just east of the coal field at shallower depths

KY OPERATING, INC1

RIORDAN, TRUMAN DTD : 8,019

K II, INC1

BROOKS, J HTD : 8,213

KENTUCKY OPERATING MW, LLC1

SHERRARD, VIRGINIATD : 7,093

<10.8 km> <13.9 KM>

0 200GR5 15CAL

2 3RHOB30 -10NPHI

0 200GR5 15CAL

2 3RHOB30 -10CNC

0 200GR5 15CAL

2 3RHOB

Sandstone

6600

6700

Mt.

Sim

on

Depth (ft)

6800

Depth (ft)Depth (ft)

6500

6400

6300

7500

7600

7700

7400

Top of Mt. Simon datum

Location

KY examples at shallower depths:

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

KYCCS

KY OPERATING, INC1

RIORDAN, TRUMAN DTD : 8,019

K II, INC1

BROOKS, J HTD : 8,213

KENTUCKY OPERATING MW, LLC1

SHERRARD, VIRGINIATD : 7,093

<10.8 km> <13.9 KM>

0 200GR5 15CAL

2 3RHOB30 -10NPHI

0 200GR5 15CAL

2 3RHOB30 -10CNC

0 200GR5 15CAL

2 3RHOB

Sandstone

6600

6700

Mt.

Sim

on

Depth (ft)

6800

Depth (ft)Depth (ft)

6500

6400

6300

7500

7600

7700

7400

Top of Mt. Simon datum

Location

KY examples at shallower depths:

There is some porosity in these wells

Porosity

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

KYCCS

From Hoholick and others, 1984, AAPG Bulletin

Research indicates decreasing porosity with depth (with large variation)

Data is mostly from Illinois and Indiana

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

KYCCS

From Hoholick and others, 1984, AAPG Bulletin

…but variable porosity where shallower than 7,000 ft.

Data is mostly from Illinois and Indiana

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

Initially targeted Mt. Simon for waste injection

• Depth: 5,193 ft

• Thickness: 761 ft

Location

Case in Point:

Dupont No. 1WAD,

Louisville KY

KYCCS

0 200GR

5 15CALI

2 3RHOB

30 -10SNP

140 40DT

Kno

x G

roup

Cop

per R

idge

Dol

.Ea

u C

laire

Precambrian Basement

Mt.

Sim

on

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

5500

Core 2Core 3Core 4Core 5

Core 6

Core 7

Core 8

Core 9Core 10

Core 11

Core 12

Core 13Core 14

Core 15

Core 16

5000

Bee

kman

tow

n

Depth

Mt. Simon

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

Initially targeted Mt. Simon

Encountered tight sand, and came up the hole into the overlying Knox Formation

Location

Case in Point:

Dupont No. 1WAD,

Louisville KY

KYCCS

0 200GR

5 15CALI

2 3RHOB

30 -10SNP

140 40DT

Kno

x G

roup

Cop

per R

idge

Dol

.Ea

u C

laire

Precambrian Basement

Mt.

Sim

on

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

5500

Core 2Core 3Core 4Core 5

Core 6

Core 7

Core 8

Core 9Core 10

Core 11

Core 12

Core 13Core 14

Core 15

Core 16

5000

Bee

kman

tow

n

Depth

Mt. Simon

KYCCS

Potential reservoirs at depth: Knox

• Found multiple thin vuggy to cavernous and fracture-associated porosity zones in the Knox (2,775-3,160 ft)Location

Case in Point:

Dupont No. 1WAD,

Louisville KY

KYCCS

Potential reservoirs at depth: Knox

• Injection rates of 150 gallons per minute (5,100 bbls per day) with probably less than 100 psi differential into the zone

• Injected for 3 years.

Location

Case in Point:

Dupont No. 1WAD,

Louisville KY

Potential reservoirs at depth: Knox

KYCCS

The Knox is a widespread, thick unit

• Dominantly non-porous dolomite, but known to have several different porosity zones locally

> 6,000 5,000-5,999 4,000-4,999 3,000-3,999 2,000-2,999

Miles0 25 50

.

.

.

.

..

. .

. .

.

.

.

.

Knox thickness (ft) Draft map

Potential reservoirs at depth: Knox

Texas Gas No. 1A Kerrick well, McLean County, Kentucky

This was Kentucky’s FutureGen proposal target

• 54 ft net matrix porosity >4%

• Mean density porosity is 9.3% (range 4 to 17%).

• Mud cake on caliper log (shaded red), and invasion profile of resistivity logs indicate significant permeability

Porosity in Copper Ridge (Lower Knox)

Location

KYCCS

Potential reservoirs at depth: Knox

IMCO Recycling Waste Injection Site,

Butler County, Kentucky

The only active waste injection site in Kentucky

• Multiple, thin porosity intervals in the upper 1,760 ft of Knox

• Inject open hole through interval

• 11 years, 3.5 million bbls injected

• No coresLocation

KYCCS

KYCCS

Potential reservoirs at depth: Knox

Gas storage fields in central Kentucky

Several Knox gas (methane) storage fields at shallow (immiscible) depths in unconformity traps at the top of the Knox in north-central Kentucky

Knox gas storageKnox oil field area

30 miles• Need close data spacing to detect

• Numerous Knox oil fields associated with unconformity “highs” and fractures in south-central Kentucky

Potential reservoirs at depth: St. Peter

KYCCS

The St. Peter Ss. overlies the Knox at depths of 3,000 to 8,500 ft. in most of western Kentucky

St. Peter structure

.

.

.

...

.

.

.. ..

.

.

.

.

Miles0 25 50

.

Well

Fault

> -8,000-7,000 to -7,999 -6,000 to -6,999 -5,000 to -5,999-4,000 to -4,999-3,000 to -3,999-2,000 to -2,999-1,000 to -1,9990 to -1,000

...

.

. .

.. ... .

..

.

.

.

.

.. .

.

..

.

. .

....

.

....................................

.... ....

....

..

..

...

.

.............

.

..

..

.

.

...

.

..

.

....

. . ..

.. .

..

.

..

.

.. .

..

.

.

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

...

...

..

..

.

.

..........

..

.

..

...

.

.

.

..

.

...

..

.

...

..

....

.

..

.

..

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

...

..

.

.. .

.

..

. .

.

..

.

.

. ....

..

..

......

.

...

....

.

.

.

...

.

.....

.

.

..

.

..

.

.

.

..

.

.....

.

.

.................

.

. .

.

.

.

.

.

...

.....

.

........

.

..

...

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

..

.

..

.

.. ...

.

..

..

.

...

.

..

.

..

.

.

. ... .. .

.

...

..

.... .

.

.

.... ..

.

...

..

.

...

.

.

.

.

.

..

.

. ...

...

.

.

..

..

........................................

.

...........

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

...

.

...

. ..

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. .....

.

.

.

. ..

..

.....

.

.

.

Elev. (ft)

Sea level datum

Draft map

Potential reservoirs at depth: St. Peter

KYCCS

.

.

...

.

.. ..

.

.

.

.

Miles0 25 50St. Peter thickness (ft)>100 99-80 79-60 59-40 39-2019-0

Well

Fault

.

.. ... .

..

.

.

.

.

.. .

.

..

.

. .

....

.

....................................

.... ....

....

..

..

...

.

.............

.

..

..

.

.

...

.

..

.

....

. . ..

.. .

..

.

..

.

.. .

..

.

.

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

...

...

..

..

.

.

..........

..

.

..

...

.

.

.

..

.

...

..

.

...

..

....

.

..

.

..

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

...

..

.

.. .

.

..

. .

.

..

.

.

. ....

..

..

......

.

...

....

.

.

.

...

.

.....

.

.

..

.

..

.

.

.

..

.

.....

.

.

.................

.

. .

.

.

.

.

.

...

.....

.

........

.

..

...

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

..

.

..

.

.. ...

.

..

..

.

...

.

..

.

..

.

.

. ... .. .

.

...

..

.... .

.

.

.... ..

.

...

..

.

...

.

.

.

.

.

..

.

. ...

...

.

.

..

..

........................................

.

...........

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

...

.

...

. ..

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. .....

.

.

.

. ..

..

.....

.

.

.

The St. Peter is 0 to 100 ft thick in western KY• Extends partly into Rough Creek Graben

Draft map

KYCCS

Potential reservoirs at depth: St. Peter

From Hoholick and others, 1984, AAPG Bulletin

Similar to the Mt. Simon, research indicates decreasing porosity with depth for the St. Peter

• Few data in western Kentucky

Fault Leakage issues

KYCCS

Faults can act as both reservoir seals and pathways for leakage

Rough Creek Fault System

Pennyrile Fault System

Faults and deep wells2,500-4,0004,000-5,0005,000-6,0006,000-8,000>8,000

Well depths (ft)

Faults

• If storage-plume areas intersect faults, sealing properties will need to be determined

• Most of the deep wells in Kentucky were drilled on structures associated with faulting

Old Well Bore Leakage Issues

KYCCS

Another potential leakage pathway is old well bores

Western Kentucky Coal Field

2,500-4,0004,000-5,0005,000-6,0006,000-8,000>8,000

Well depths (ft)

Faults

Faults and wells >2,500 ft

• Saline formations not penetrated by large numbers of wells are favorable to units that are widely penetrated

.30%gFutureGen criteria

In the FutureGen proposals, seismic risk limits were set at peak acceleration of 0.3% g with 2% probability of exceedence in 50 years by the Federal government

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/products_data/images/nshm_us02.gif

Seismic risk Issues

KYCCS

• Such a limit would restrict the western part of the Western Kentucky Coal Field from consideration

• We don’t have to use this restriction, but we need to be aware that similar seismic risk restrictions are likely for future plants using Federal funds

Water supply issues

KYCCS

Another issue might be proximity to large water supplies

Existing power plantsProposed plants

• Power plants and potential coal-to-liquids plants that will need CO2 storage also need large water supplies• Not needed for test hole, but may need to be considered when choosing sites

KYCCS

Maximum? project depths

Previous research (Hoholick and others, 1984) shows diminishing porosity with depth in the St. Peter and Mount Simon sandstones

7,000 ft

7,000 ft

• Expenses of drilling increase with deeper depths

• Little evidence for more than 5% porosity at depths of more than 7,000 to 8,000 ft

Potential site selection method

KYCCS

We can use the existing site bank developed for commercial-scale CTL and CTG plants by the Governor’s Office of Energy Policy or look for other available areas for drilling. Then we need to compare site characteristics through a series of weighted criteria

The following shows how an initial geologic site selection might be done. It is not the final selection. It is only meant to show how a set of criteria might be used to help select an area. The actual criteria used have yet to be decided.

• Geologic and non-geologic criteria will have to be considered

KYCCS

Potential site selection method to show how a set of criteria might be used to help screen sites

For example, if we want to test the major regional saline reservoirs, including basal sands, but at depths not exceeding 8,000 ft. in order to maximize potential for porosity in deep sandstones, then….

Depth to the Precambrian basement

Draft map

Western Kentucky Coal

Field

KYCCS

10,000 ft or less8,000 ft or lessPrecambrian tests

Depth to basement

This would result in site selection weighted toward the eastern margin of the WKY coal field (and areas east of coal field)

Western Kentucky Coal

Field

Knox injections

Draft

Potential site selection method to show how a set of criteria might be used to help screen sites

10,000 ft or less8,000 ft or lessPrecambrian tests

Depth to basement

• The farther west we look in the WKY coal field, the deeper and more expensive a well will be to test the Mt. Simon

Western Kentucky Coal

Field

Knox injections

KYCCS

Draft

Potential site selection method to show how a set of criteria might be used to help screen sites

10,000 ft or less8,000 ft or lessPrecambrian tests

Depth to basement

Western Kentucky Coal

Field

Knox injections

KYCCS

Draft

Potential site selection method to show how a set of criteria might be used to help screen sites

• Also, the Mt. Simon will be at depths where it has little porosity elsewhere in the basin

• Shallower options might have to be considered

KYCCS

• If we further restrict area to where there is basal sands, Mt. Simon, St. Peter (or other deep sandstones including some Silurian sands) at depths between 8,000 to 2,500 ft, in order to intercept multiple horizons in this range, the area is more limited

10,000 ft or less8,000 ft or lessPrecambrian tests

Depth to basement

Knox injections

Potential site selection method to show how a set of criteria might be used to help screen sites

Draft map

Western Kentucky Coal

Field

KYCCS

Potential site selection method to show how a set of criteria might be used to help screen sites

This example scenario shows how a set of criteria might be developed to aid in determining the area best suited for a test well. It is not the final set of criteria

• Geologic and non-geological criteria will be evaluated with the ultimate goal to drill a well (or wells) that meets the objectives of House Bill 1 with the available funding and industry participation

KYCCS

• Finalize site screening criteria

• Choose a potential test site or sites

• Final site characterization– Subsurface mapping– Purchase existing or acquire new seismic data – Characterize potential reservoirs with existing data– Characterize seals with existing data– Design monitoring plan (subsurface and surface)

Western Kentucky Deep Well Planning

A working committee that includes KGS and industry partners must work together to:

KYCCS

• Well design and engineering• Permitting• Drilling

– Obtain whole core and side-wall cores in reservoir and seal intervals

– Run and interpret extensive suite of well logs– Collect brine samples from target zones for geochemistry– Analyze core samples for porosity, permeability,

mineralogy, cements, mechanical strength, and other physical properties

– Conduct injection tests using fluid, air or CO2

• Monitoring, verification, and closure• Public education and outreach• Reporting and technology transfer

Western Kentucky Deep Well Planning

KYCCS

Western Kentucky Deep Well Planning

Thank you

Let’s open the floor for questions

KYCCS

Minimum storage depths

The actual density and volume change of injected CO2will depend on the salinity (and density) of the formation water, reservoir temperature, and reservoir pressure…

…downhole data that is relatively lacking in Kentucky, and that will need to be collected in this test

Graph from MRCSP Phase 1 Final Report (Wickstrom end others, 2004)

Potential reservoirs at depth: Mount Simon

KYCCS

Existing basin data (few in KY) indicates Mt. Simon cements are quartz and potassium feldspar overgrowths with lesser hematite, kaolinite, chlorite, chert, and carbonate (Hoholick and others, 1984).

Mt. Simon core, Dupont well, Louisville, KY

Potential reservoirs at depth: St. Peter

KYCCS

• Existing basin data (few in KY) indicates cements are calcite, dolomite, authigenicanhydrite, chert, chalcedony, chlorite, and quartz overgrowths (Hoholick and others, 1984).

St. Peter is dominantly a fine-grained quartz sandstone with shale and carbonate interbeds

KYCCS

Dissolution and brecciationporosity

Algal porosity

Fractures

Potential reservoirs at depth: Knox

Knox core, Dupontwells

DOE Phase I CO2 Storage Estimates

While CO2 EOR potential is significant, deep saline or Devonianshale storage will be needed to handle expected volumes

Bill

ion

Bill

ion

tonn

esto

nnes

6.1

25.1

0.31.10

10

20

30

Oil Fields Coals Deep Saline

Spec

ulat

ive

DevonianShale

Not Demonstrated

Kentucky data below minimum storage depths

KYCCS

XXXX

XXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXX

XX

XX

XXXXXXXX

X

XX

X

XXX

XX

XX

XXXXXXX

XX

X

X

XXXXX

X

X

X

XXX

XXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXX

XXX

XXX

X

XX

XXX

X

X

XX

XXX

XXXXX

XXXXXXXX

XXXX

XXX

XXX

XX

XXXXX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XXX

XXXXXXXX

XXXXX

XXX

XXXXX

XX XXX X XXXXX X X XXXXXXXXX

XXX

XX

XX

XXX

X X XX XX X XX X XXX XX

XXX

XXXXXX

XXX

XX

XX

X

XXX

XX

XX

XX

X

XX

XXXX

X

X

XXXXXX

XX

XXX

XX XXXX

XXXX

XX

X

XXXXX

X XXXXXXXX XXXX

XXXXX

XXX

X XXXXX

XX

X

XXXXXXX

XXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXX

XX

X

X

XX

XX

XXX

XXXX

X

XXXXX XX X

XX

XXXX

XXXX

XX

XXX

XX

XXXX

XX

X

XXX

XXXXXXXX

XXXXX

XX

XXX

X

XX

X

XXX

X

XX

X

XXXXXXX

XXXX

XXXXXX

XXX

XXXXX

X

XX

XXXXXXX

X

XX

XX

XXX

XXXX

XXXXXXXX

XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXX

XXXXX XXXXXX

XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX

Seismic lines

Miles0 25 50

Seismic data is used to infer rock units and faults at depth where well data is lacking