42A06NEe375 2.4376 SHAW 010

l:t-;

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

SHAW 12 and #3 GROUPS (Max and Brown-McDade Options)

SHAW TOWNSHIP, Ontario^

Hollinger Argus Limited

RECEIVEDDEC

MINING UNDS SECTION

Tiinmins, Ontario November 17, 1981

J. E. Mountjoy

- l -

^INTRODUCTIONDuring the period from May 20, 1981 to October 16,

1981 geological mapping was carried out over the Brown-McDade

Option (Shaw #3 Group) and the Max Option (Shaw #2 Group), in

Shaw Township. Mapping was completed by the writer with the

able assistance of one student geologist: Robert King.

PROPERTY, LOCATION and ACCESS

The Brown-McDade Option consists of fifteen contig

uous unpatented mining claims, numbered P.451066-P.451068

inclusive, P.539611-P.539617 inclusive and P.539673-P.539677

inclusive. The group is located in portions of lots 9, 10, 11

and 12, Con. VI, Shaw Township, Porcupine Mining Division. The

Max Option consists of 2 patented claims HR1018 and HR1040 in

lots 9 and 10, Con. VI, Shaw Township, Porcupine Mining Division.

The property is easily accessible via an all weather

gravel road from South Porcupine, Ontario.

HISTORY

Numerous trenches have been observed during the mapping

of this property. It is believed that some of these were com

pleted more than fifty years ago as there has been active exp

loration in the area since the early 1900's. In fact the first

staking in Shaw Township was done in 1906.

M and M Porcupine Gold Mines Ltd have filed airborne

magnetometer and electromagnetic surveys in 1965. These surveys

cover a large number of the claims which make up the Brown-McDade

Option.Augdome Corporation Ltd has filed a ground magnetic

survey which covers a large part of claims P.451066, P.451067,

P.539676 and P.539677. Augdome Corporation Ltd has also filed

the results of three diamond drill holes on claim number P.539677

for assessment credits.Hole number one (Aug-1-66) is located approximately

750' south of the 0+00 BL on line 12E. This hole was drilled on

- 2 -

fa bearing of 200O at a dip of -45O for a distance of 362'.

Hole number two (Aug-2-66) is located 975' south of the 0+00

BL, 80' west of line 12E. This hole was drilled on a bearing

of 2000 at a dip of -45O for a distance of 500'. Hole number

three (Aug-3-66) is located 1290' south of the 0+00 BL, 200*

west of line 12E. This hole also was drilled on a bearing of

2000 at a dip of -45O for a distance of 538'. Iron formations

with low gold values were discovered as a result of the diamond

drilling.In 1977 ground electromagnetic and magnetometer

surveys were filed by J.P. Larche for assessment credits on

the J. Helpert property in Shaw Township.

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The Brown-McDade Option in Shaw Township is located

in the north central portion of a large (approx. 150 sg. Miles)

elliptically shaped geological feature. This feature is made

up primarily of rocks from the Tisdale and Deloro Groups. The

central portion of the elliptical feature is made up of mafic

metavolcanics (massive and pillowed flows). The information

gained from the pillowed flows show the direction of tops to

be away from the centre of the ellipse, thus the theory of a

dome structure. This feature is now referred to as the Shaw

Dome. Moving out from the centre of the dome, intermediate to

felsic pyroclastics and flows of the Deloro Group are found.

As one travels from the centre of the dome one encounters the

younger sequence of rock types from the Tisdale Group. First

rocks of ultramafic composition, then mafic flows, followed

by felsic flows and pyroclastics. Closely associated with

the felsic rocks of the Deloro Group and ultramafic rocks of

the Tisdale Group is a banded iron formation made up of mag

netite, carbonate, chert, pyrite and pyrrhotite. The iron

formation is quite often patchy and discontinuous.

In the central region of the Shaw Dome numerous

outcrops of agglomerate have been mapped, (Carlson, H.D. 1965).

The presence of large clasts suggests a proximal environment

to one or more vents.

- 3 -

Northwest trending faults associated with the

Timiskaming Fault system have been mapped in this region

(Carlson, H.D. 1965). One of these faults cross the claims

under discussion. The Montreal River Fault is located in the

central portion of the Brown-McDade Option. An abandoned

power line was built directly on the fault which trends 321O

as it crosses the Brown-McDade Option. Two other faults cross

the property trend north-south on either side of the Montreal

River Fault while crossing the Brown-McDade Option.

Late stage diabase dykes believed to be of Matachewan

and Keweenawan ages have been mapped in the region (Carlson,

H.D. 1965).

ECONOMIC GEOLOGY

Since the early nineteen hundreds, geological exp

loration has been carried out in this region. The main thrust

of this exploration has been the search for gold although there

has been some interest in the ultramafic rocks of the Shaw Dome

for nickel and to a lesser extent asbestos mineralization.

The two main environments for gold mineralization in

the region which have been most actively explored are quartz

carbonate veins, particularly those near stocks of quartz 'feld

spar porphyry and the sulphide rich, banded iron formation.

The first environment accounts for vittually ali the

gold production in the rocks of the Tisdale Group.

The second environment accounts for most of the inter

esting showings found in the rocks of the Deloro Group, although

trenches have been sunk on quartz carbonate veins. The most

notable of these being the Tommy Burns vein found on the Malga

Property which carries erratic gold values.

The two major showings in the Deloro Group are on

the Malga and Carshaw properties which are both located in

lots l and 2 Con. II, Shaw Township. The main gold bearing

unit in the area is banded iron formation located relatively

close to intrusions of quartz porphyry and the Croteau Creek

Fault.

- 4 .

The iron formations on these properties are locally

contorted and brecciated by drag folding thus opening dilatant

zones for secondary quartz carbonate veining, sulphide mineral

ization and auriferous solutions. Although the iron formation

is well mineralized throughout, gold values are not always present,

but where the secondary veins are mineralized with sulphides

they do carry gold values roughly proportionate to the amount

of sulphide mineralization present. Published tonnages in the

Canadian Mines Handbook reported that the ore reserves for the

Malga property in 1947 was 180,000 tons @ 0.2288 ounces of gold

per ton. While the ore reserves for the Carshaw in 1949 from

the same source was 230,000 tons @ 0.257 ounces of gold per ton.

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

Rock-types and Distribution

The geology of the properties is presented on the

accompanying map (l w*200' or 1:2400)(see back folder). Int

erpretation is based on geological data mapped in outcrop and

ground magnetic patterns. Interpreted geological contacts

are thought to be reasonable but oversimplified. Although there

is a fair amount of outcrop exposure an almost impenetrable

cover of lichens jmakes .it .difficult to recognize contacts. The

effect of the flat dips and changes in topography combine to

produce contacts which do not always correspond with the strike

of the rock units. In 1966 Augdome Corporation Ltd drilled

three holes in the south west portion of the property, these

diamond drill holes were logged by A. Hopkins. The three holes

are plotted on the accompanying map by projecting contacts

vertically.The oldest rock exposed in the map area is a fine

grained intermediate volcanic tuff (A,t) which is light green

to dark green in colour, due to varying amounts of chlorite

alteration and bleaching. This unit exhibits finely laminated

beds and is moderately to highly carbonitized (cc) in numerous

locations. This unit generally strikes SE dipping NE between

480 and 18O .

- 5 -

The overlaying unit is an intermediate pyroclastic

agglomerate (A2agl) that strikes ESE and dips NNE at 31 .

This unit is thin (JJf6') and is well exposed along Dome's gravel

pit road in the north west portion of the map area. The matrix

is fine grained and dark green (chloritic), while the clasts

which range in size from l" to 6", are much lighter in colour. The clasts appear to be homogeneous in composition. Due to the

variance in clast size, between the tuff and the agglomerate one

could envision one source experiencing explosive episodes of

differing intensities or two sources, one distal and one proximal.

The next youngest sequence is a series of mafic lavas

(A2 ) that strike roughly SE and dip to the NE at approximately

30 . This sequence is made up of massive flows of andesite

composition exhibiting a wide variance in alteration from dark

green and chloritic, to light green, bleached and highly carbon-

itized. These flows have an aphanitic texture and amygdules are

sometimes found, particularly in the east part of the property

and in drill core. It is believed that there has been periods

of .quiescence in the volcanic activity since in many locations,

there are narrow discontinuous units of banded iron formation (E).

It is still unclear as to the exact origin of these sediments.

One of the possibilities is that these formations are chemical

precipitates; another is that they are clastic sediments. The

iron formation consists of alternating bands of fine grained,

gritty, sugary quartz, black magnetite-rich chert, dark grey

massive aphanitic chert and sometimes, bands of dull red jaspilite.

Almost all the iron formations in our map area contain sulphide mineralization and on the weathered surface are rusty brown. In

many of the outcrops, the iron formations are contorted, and

some are cut by secondary stringers of greyish white quartz. In

cases where the magnetite rich bands are present, the magnetic

survey clearly defines the presence of the iron formation.

Immediately following this period, or periods, of quiescence the first flows that passed over the iron formation

picked up xenoliths of the iron formation. Particulary well

preserved are xenoliths of the gritty white quartz. These fragments

- 6 -

range in size from V' to 2" and are angular. This unit (A2a) has

f* only been found in close proximity to iron formation or the mag

netic impression of iron formation.

The youngest extrusive of the map area is a pillowed

flow (A2p) which is seen overlying the massive flows in the western

portion of the property. In my mapping I was unable to confid

ently determine a direction of tops although it is generally

believed to be to the northeast in this region, {Carlson, H.D.

1964). This means that the rocks have not been overturned. The

pillows observed by the author were generally 2' to 3* long with

a 3:1 ratio of length to width. The composition of the pillowed

flow appeared very similar to that of the underlying massive flows.

South of the 0+00 BL near the Deloro-Shaw Township

boundary an intrusive of uncertain age occurs. It has been mapped

by the author as a gabbro (M,). It is medium to dark green in

colour and much coarser grained than the extrusive volcanics

of the map area. There are also small lath-like feldspars visible

in hand specimens.There are two diabase dykes in the map area, one is a

quartz diabase (O) of Matachewan age. The dyke trends NW. It

is strongly magnetic and medium to coarse grained. The other diabase

dyke is an olivene diabase(Q) of Keweenawan age. This dyke trends

ENE across the entire map area. The outcrop of olivene diabase

on line 32+00 E shows excellent spheroidal weathering.

On line 4+00 W we have an outcrop that does not appear

to coincide with the afore-mentioned sequence. The confusion may

be caused by the outcrops proximity to the junction of the N and

the NE trending faults.

STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY

Faulting:

There are five faults which cross the map area. The

two oldest faults which cross the map area trend NE. These faults

are truncated by all the other faults particularly the series of

faults that trend NW similar to the Montreal River Fault. This

is well displayed on the l" to h mile Map 2222 entitled Night

- 7 -

Hawk Lake Area (Leahy, E.J. 1968).

The Montreal River Fault which crosses through the

centre of the Brown-McDade Option is older than the two N

trending faults. This is kn'own because an offset of the Montreal

River Fault by the N trending fault found in the eastern sect

ion of the property has been mapped near the Dome's gravel pit

(Pyke, D.R. 1973).

The two N trending faults are the youngest of the

three generations of faults found on the Shaw 12 and 1 3 Groups.

From the afore-mentioned offset of the Montreal River Fault and

assuming that the iron formation was continuous prior to fault

ing both faults show a dextral displacement. Using the magnetic

impression of the iron formation we see a dextral displacement

of approximately 250' along the N trending fault in the western

portion of the Brown-McDade Option.

Folding:

On the map of the Timmins Area (Pyke, D.R. 1973) a

questionable anticline is shown passing through the eastern portion

of the map area. From the joining of contacts in drill holes

(see map, back pocket) it appears there maybe some support for

this anticline. Unfortunately, structural measurements (i.e.

strikes and dips) failed to substantiate this conclusively.

CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS

The property is underlain by a layered volcanic sequence

of predominantly andesitic composition. These volcanics have

erratic lenses of banded iron formation located between the flows.

The entire property is in the north central portion of the Shaw

Dome with the units dipping shallowly to the north or northeast.

Given the status of the property and the nature of the

verry erratic gold values obtained, primarily in the banded iron

formation, further work does not appear warranted at this time.

November 17, 1981 J.E. Mountjoy

- 8 -

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Carlson, H.D. 1967, Geology of Ogden, Deloro and Shaw

Townships, District of Cochrane: Ontario Department

of Mines, Geological Branch, Open File Report No. 5012,

Preliminary Maps P.341 - P.343, Geology 1964 and 1965.

Leahy, E.J. 1971, Geology of the Night Hawk Lake Area,

District of Cochrane: Ontario Department of Mines

and Northern Affairs, Geological Report 96, Accomp

anying Map 2222 f Night Hawk Lake Area.

Northern Miner Press Limited, Canadian Mines Handbook

1947, pp 194.

Northern Miner Press Limited, Canadian Mines Handbook

1949, pp 44.

Pyke, D.R. 1974, Timmins Area, District of Cochrane and

Timiskaming: Ontario Div. Mines,'Preliminary Map

P.941, Geol. Series, l inch to l mile, Geology and

Compilation, 1973.

Pyke, D.R. 1975, On the Relationship of Gold Mineralization

and Ultramafic Volcanic Rocks in the Timmins Area;

Ontario Div. Mines, MP62, 23p.

Assessment Files - Resident Geologist's Office, Timmins.

SUPPLEMENTARY to SHAW No's 2 , 3 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT

Hollinger has drilled 2 holes on the Shaw #3 Group. Hole number one {SH 3-1-81) is located 125m north of the 0+00 BL on line 4E. This hole was drilled on a bearing of 250 at a dip of -450 for a distance of 727'. Hole number two {SH 3-2-81) is located 50m north of the 0+00 BL on XL 6E. This hole was drilled i of 528'.drilled on a bearing of 180O at a dip of -46 for a distance

Hollinger has also drilled seven holes on the Shaw #2 Group. Hole number one (SH 2-1-81) is located 150m south of the 0+00 BL on XL 6E. This hole was drilled on a bearing of 1800 at a dip of -45O for a distance of 643'. Hole number two {SH 2-2-81) is located 270m south of the 0+00 BL on XL 6E. This hole was drilled on a bearing of 180O at a dip of -45O for a distance of 131'. Hole number three {SH 2-3-81) is located 278m south of the 0+00 BL, 10.5m east of XL 6E. This hole was drilled on a bearing of 260 at a dip of -70O for a distance of 128'. Hole number four {SH2-4-81) is located 278m south of the 0+00 BL, 10.5m east of XL 6E . This hole was drilled vert ical for a distance of 100'. Hole number five {SH 2-5-81) is located approximately 270m south of the 0+00 BL, 4m east of XL 6E. This hole was drilled vertical for a distance of 35.5'. Hole number six (SH 2-6-81) is located approximately 244m south of the 0+00 BL, 4m east of XL 6E . This hole was drilled vertical for a distance of 35'. Hole number seven (SH 2-7-81) is located approximately 244m south of the 0+00 BL, 20m east of XL 6E. This hole was drilled on a bearing of 270O at a dip of -50O for a distance of 59.5'. Vertical projections of the afore-mentioned holes has been plotted on the map entitled "Shaw No*s 2, 3 Geology" at a scale of 1"^200'. Iron formations with low gold values were intersected as a result of the diamond drilling.

December 16, 1981 J.E. Mountjoy

Type ey.

ASSESSMENT WORK DETAILS

GEOLOGICAL

Township or Area.

Chief Line Cutter, or Contractor

A separate form is required for each type c 4 2Ae6NEe375 2.4376 SHAWSHAW TOWNSHIP

300

Name

Party Chief.Address

JOHN E. MOUNTJOYName

P.O.Box 320, Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2Address

Consultant.Name

Address

Geological field mapping hv John E. Mountjoy_________Name

P.O. Box 320, Timmins, Ont.Address p4N 7 E2

COVERING DATES

Line Cutting —-.———-—.———————————^-——.———.———-—.

Field May 20 to October 30, 1981____________Instrument work, geological mapping, sampling etc.

Dffire October 31 to November 20, 1981________

INSTRUMENT DATA

Make, Model and Type.

Scale Constant or Sensitivity ——^—^——-—— Or provide copy of instrument data from Manufacturer's brochure.

Radiometric Background Count

Number of Stations Within Claim Group

Number of Readings Within Claim Group

Number of Miles of Line cut Within Claim Group Q 4 Q mi

Number of Samples Collected Within Claim Group(traversed)

CREDITS REQUESTED

Geological Survey

Geophysical Survey

Geochemical Survey

40UAYS^ per claim

D

nATF. Dec - 2' 1 98 *,r.NKn

20 DAYS per claim

S

D

D

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED _____List numerically—-—-

P.539611

P.539612

P. 539613

P.539614

P.539615

P.539616

.P..539617.,

P.539673 "J BP.539674

P.539675

P.539676

P.539677

TOTAL CLAIMS. 12

Send in Duplicate to:FRED W. MATTHEWS SUPERVISOR-PROJECTS SECTION DEPARTMENT Op'MINES Se NORTHERN AFFAIRS WHITNEY BLOCK QUEEN'S PARK TORONTO, ONTARIO

Performance and coverage credits do not apply to airborne gurveys

SUBMISSION OF GEOLOGICAL, GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL SURVEYS

AS ASSESSMENT WORK

In order to simplify the filing of geological, geochemical and ground geophysical surveys for assessment work, the Minister has approved the following procedure under Section 84 (8a) of the Ontario Mining Act. This special provision does not apply to airborne geophysical surveys.

If, in the opinion of the Minister, a ground geophysical survey meets the ; requirements prescribed for such a survey, including: V - '",

(a).,- substantial and systematic coverage of each claim ^ (b)/ line spacing not exceeding 400 foot intervals ,-y (c)' stations not exceeding 100 foot intervals or V' (d) the average number of readings per claim not less than 40 readingsr V *

it will •'qualify for a credit of 40 assessment work days for each claim so covered. It will f/ rtht beWiecessary for the applicant to furnish any data or breakdown concerning the

persons employed in the survey except for the names and addresses of those in charge of fX the various phases (linecutting contractor, etc.). It will be assumed that the required

number of man days were spent in producing the survey to qualify for the specifiedcredit.

Each additional ground geophysical survey using the same grid system and otherwise meeting these requirements will qualify for an assessment work credit of 20 days.

A geological survey using the same grid system, and meeting the requirements for submission of geological surveys for maximum credits will qualify for an assessment work credit of 20 days. If line cutting has not previously been reported with any other survey and is reported in conjunction with the geological survey a credit of 40 days per claim will be allowed for the survey.

Similarly, a geochemical survey using the same grid system with the average number of collected samples per claim being .not less than 40 samples, and meeting the requirements for the submission of geochemical surveys for maximum credits, will qualify for an assessment work credit of 20 days. If line cutting has not previously been reported with any other survey and is reported in conjunction with the geochemical survey a credit of 40 days per claim will be allowed for the survey.

Credits for partial coverage or for surveys not meeting requirements for full credit will be granted on a pro-rata basis.

If the credits are reduced for any reason, a fifteen day Notice of Intent will be issued. During this period, the applicant may apply to the Mining Commissioner for relief if his claims are jeopardized for lack of work or, if he wishes, may file with the Department, normal assessment work breakdowns listing the names of the employees and the dates of work. The survey would then be re-assessed to determine if higher credits may be allowed under the provisions of subsections 8 and 9 of section 84 of the Mining Act.

If new breakdowns are not submitted, the Performance and Coverage credits are confirmed to the Mining Recorder at the end of the fifteen days.

Ontario •k.Ministry ofNaturalResources

Notification of recording

of assessment work credits

Lands Administration Branch

Mining Lands Section

Ministry of Natural Resources

Room 1617. Whitney Block

Queen's Park, Toronto

M7A 1W3

RECEIVEDNUV - 3 WB1

MINING WN&S SICTION

Date of recording of work: October 29,1981________

Recorded holder:____Hoi linger Argus Limited

Address: ———~

Township or Area: ______Shaw Township

Box 320, Timmins, Ontario PAN 7E2

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining claims

Geophysical

Magnetometer-

-days

P-539611 to 617 Incl. P-539673 to 677 Incl. P-546159

-days

-days

Induced polarization.

77 /9Section SB ( IS)

-days

Geological ̂ 20

jdays

-days

Geochemical .days

Man days

Special provision Q

Airborne O

Ground IXl

Notice to recorded holder:

S Survey reports and maps in duplicate be submitted to the Lands Administration Branch, Toronto with in 60 days from the date of recording of this work.

D Reports and maps are being forwarded to the Lands Administration Branch with this letter.

f ' -}. ( Mining recorder

c.c.Holl inger Argus Limited

792 (0/77) LA. 065

^Ontario

Ministry of Natural

sources

Technical Assessment Work Credits

File

2.4376

Recorded Holder

HOLLINGER ARGUS LIMITEDTownship or Area

Tnwnshin

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining Claims AtsesMd

Geophysical

Electromagnetic ,

Magnetometer.

Radiometric

Induced polarization .

Section 86 (18)

Geological ^ - 20

Geochemical.

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

P 539611 to 17 inclusiveP 539674 to 77 inclusiveP 451066 to 68 inclusive

Man days Q

Special provision D3

Airborne D

Ground 09

O Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

tpecial credits under section 86 (15a) for the following mining claims

10 Days P 539673

credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

IX) not sufficiently covered by the survey

P 546159

LJ Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on ach claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 86(181-60:

Ministryof GeotechnicalNatural RonortResources "eP0'*

Ontario Approval

Mining Lands Comments

s ^SrtJ^lJLar.--.

To: Geophysics

Comments

I-"?:,k:;, i 1 :

IT"

LJ Approved f] With to see again with correctionsDate Signature

ro: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

lWith to sea again with corrections

To: Geochemistry

Comments

Q Approved Q] Wish to see again with correctionsDat* Signature

S:

D To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380) _

16*3 (81/10)

Ministry ofNaturalResources

1982 07 16

Your file:

Our file: 2 .4376

Hollinger Argus Limited P.O. Box 320 Timmins, Ontario P4N 7E2

Attn: Mr. J.E. Mountjoy

aaaamaIlk Ul. J 6

Dear Sir:

RE: Geological Survey submitted on Mining Claims ______P 539611 et al in the Township of Shawi- -. -

Enclosed are the plans (in duplicate) for the above- mentioned survey. In order to complete your submission we require the following on these maps:

a) both maps must be signed.

b) the outcrop must be designated by colour and by a le.tter corresponding to the rock type as listed in the legend.

For further information, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416-965-1380.

purs very truly,

"f F . Anderson Director Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

A.' Barr/sc

Encls:

c.c. Mining Recorder Timmins.

RECEIVEDJUl 261982

MINING UNDS SCCTION

July 20, 1982.

Returned as requested.

John E. Mountjoy.

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

SEPT 38

Your file:

September 7, 1982

Mr. William L. GoodMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with state ments listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLands Administration Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM?A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

/em

End.

cc: Hollinger Argus Limited Timmins, Ontario

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 4 Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

845 (6/79)

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports 2.4376Ontario

September 7, 1982

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed end a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 (82fS l

(f'i\ i f e.

HOLLINGER ARGUS LIMITEDP.O. BOX 32OTIMMINS. ONTARIO P4N 7E2

TELEPHONE: (7O5) 294-1313

December 17, 1981

E.F. AndersonDirector, Lands Administration BranchMinistry of Natural ResourcesWhitney Block, Queen's ParkTORONTO, OntarioM7A 1X1

Dear Sir:Enclosed is a page to be added to

the Geological Report on the Shaw No's 2 and 3 Groups which was filed for assessment credits December 2 , 1 981. The page is a clarification of the diamond drilling done by Hollinger Argus Limited. The diamond drill holes were vertical ly projected and plotted on the map entitled "Geological Survey Shaw No's 2 and 3 Groups", but were not explained in the report.

Yours sincerely

RECEIVEDLand Management Brsnch CIRCULATE D COMMENTS mm [jBY

DEC 2 2 1981E, f. ANDERSON

j. R. MORTON

J. C. SMITH ^

W. GOOD

V. LEONARD

J, M . Sr^.tL

RCTURN TO R.6A50

J.E. Mountjoy Geologist

Enc. RECEIVEDDEC 2

MINING LANDS SECTION

December 18, 1981 2.4376

Office of the Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resource* 60 Wilson Avenue Timmlne, Ontario P4N 2S7

Dear Sin

Ve have received report* and naps for a Geological Survey submitted under Special Provision* (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims P.539611 et al, in the Township of Shaw.

Thi* material will be examined and aa*e**ed and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued.

Your* very truly,

B.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen** ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

J. Skura/bk

c j Hollinger Argus Limited Timmins, Ontario Attention: John E. Mountjoy

1982 07 16 2.4376

Hollinger Argot Limited P.O. Box 320 Timmins, Ontario PAN 7E2

Attni Mr. J*E. Mountjoy

Dear Sir t

RE t Geological 8 H r ir ay submitted on Mining Claims _____P 539611 at al in the Town ah i p of Shaw- - .

Kncloaed are the plane (in duplicete) for the above- mentioned survey. In order to complete your submission we require the following on theae map*i

a) both mape must be eigned.

b) the outcrop must be designated by colour and by a letter corresponding to the rock type as listed in the legend.

For further information, please contact Mr. F.V. Matthews at 416-965-1380.

Tours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Quean's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1V3Phone: 416/965-1380

A/ Barr/se

Ends s

c.c. Mining Recorder Timmins.

1982 11 05 2.4376

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resource*60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioPAN 2S7

Dear Sir:

RE: Geological Survey on Mining Claims P 539611 et al in the Township of Shaw.

The Geological Survey assessment work credits as listed with my Notice of Intent dated September 7, 1982 have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of thase mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Tours very truly.

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

A. Barr:sc

cc: Hollinger Argus Limited Timmins, Ontario

cc: Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario

MAP SYM80LOGY

Aeriol Coblewoy

Boundary

l -itorrictionoi

Dutricl, Tamihip

Indian A*tin*

Approilmot*

Park Boundary

Bridge

Rio d, Ral (road

Building

Chimney

Cliff, Pit,Pile

Contours

l nt rrpol nled

Aporom ir01*

Control Points

H o r i lontol

Vertical

Culvert

Falls

Double l K l r iver

Fence, Hedge, __ ,^^^ Wall

Feotuie Outlineate ) ~ ~ ~~ ~

Flooded Land ftvvrij Or*w

LOCK ^-^^

Marsh or Swamp -* -^

Mast j,1:.

Mine Head Frame a

Outcrop -.'..-"-V..

H OI774051

O 300 02

T

JT-Faltt

Pipeline(obcwi ground)

Roi l road

Sing)* T rack

Oaubl* Track

Abandon l d

'uriloblt

Road

, County

To

Act* M (toad of daughlful

main l* none* or

lignificanl driveway)

*f l

Rapids

Doubl* line river with mulfipie rap'dt

D-,uklr hat n*rr itN Multlpl* ropid*

^ .Reservoir

River, Stream, Gonal

-Itiction o( f l-o w ^^__-. ̂.

hockli jnif icont -f

: hoal . ':^y

Spot Elevation(lak* .| e yotion*( '300-0

lower a

Transmission Line

Tunnel ^^)————w

Utility Poles

Wharf .Dock, Pier

Wooded Area

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

S.R. - SURFACE RIGHTS M.R. -MINING RIGHTS

Description Onfer No. DIM Deposition Fit*

J) Rtc Pjrp. SfC.3 PLA. 189543

fit) W. 97/77 15/12/77 S.R.O. 66555

SAND AND GRAVEL

GRAVEL

GRAVEL

53 666

68760

KEY PLAN

For O.B *M. Map

20174*

20174*

0053600

SS3:5:-S:

XvXvXv-

OOS35M

201749005360G

2017490053500

ale

WHITNEY TWP

490000mE

Q.^H

O flCoUJo

536 00 00 mN

47886 \47867

p l P

584113 ,.,,\ 584114

47884 p

584116

528853 528858

478 6Bp

- 5 8 4 M 2

529944 l 47885

p584116

H.R. H.R.I040\ "018 \ 2 8450

-^-:.-:-/ 500909 528855 ' 528\ 860

5 39677 l 539

CL 175 1931262894 A

H.R. P

1044

P \H.R 16333 \ 981

50Q9II jbc, 3 009115WITHDRAWN . FROM STAKING

P.P.

P 15320 \ 4P 26693 \ P26694i

89 l 540188

,uk H n ^V n' D.S. 2 l 238

1532213441 P 19159

H.R, P H.R.985 l 986 '

R 22584 l P 22585 l R 26784

37209030, l/ P ^ . - ^. _ ̂ - -L. -^

: 35490 ; 35489591343

533875 J 59386*

591348 l 591347 | 5913465 4 0/21 l l

6/34655 |63^653

OS. M

R I703)T

FARM ,^ LO

5546^28 l 'i 5 4 631\ J

6155 77 ' 615'5 73 6IDI6S7 554635 l 554 S36

— ~ ~ —\— -^ (~^

390^6 / p- ^^^I 6!005Z i 610O54

6ISV328 i 610051 6I004B j y ! 6097-16 6IOC47 ' 6 15;580

U f

— — — -- — L . 609744 , \

618582 ,/ 6)5571

695518057 4am

S96499/ 6I586\I J 6 I9&Q2 615606 \ l 6 15805V.

E.O. 371

!300 /P 13814o, ___uy X

"^"" l s~ ~ X ~~ 615859 61 5807 lv DamS615860 i S 6 l \5 8 63

613827 l 6I51B34 \ ' 615843 s. SI5B44x - r, \

S 6 15808 l l 6 l 6003

^615842 l 611584^8 S6I5852 l 6 168^5 615809 615802

-l _ _ _ _ -t- _ _ -

615796 l SI 578613813 6 1,5816

J ? 9-i--.

615850 l 6158^761*648 6 1 58375^99/99^4 l 5 49997

p.^ ?93

\ ' xE99?3S l 399X996-f 9 3

615839 ' , 615848 59734,2 397339

Q.

^I-

Z < Soc< o

536 00 00 m N

ELDORADO TWP.

LEGEND

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No

OTHER R OADS

TRAILS

SURVEYED LINES:

TOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES, ETC.

LOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC

UNSURVEYEO LINES

LOT LINES

PARCEL BOUNDARY

MINING CLAIMS ETC

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY

UTILITY LINES

NON PERENNIAL STREAM

FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS

SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN

RESERVATIONS

ORIGINAL SHORELINE

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES

TRAVERSE MONUMENT

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOL

PATENT. SURFACE 8t M INING RIGHTS ................... 0

.SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY........................

, MINING RIGHTS ONLY ....,...,...........^... O

LEASE, SURFACE 8* MINING RIGHTS...,-. ....... .. H

" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.......................... H

" , MINING RIGHTS ONLY.............. ............ B

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ..........^...-...........,.. T

ORDER-IN-COUNCIL .....'...,............................. OC

RESERVATION ...,^,.....,,,.,,.....................^.^

CANCELLED ._,.........,...,,.........,,^......,.,

SAND St G RAVEL ..,....,........,.............^.......,..

NOTE: MINING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED PRIOR TO MAY 6.

1913, VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC

LANDS ACT, R SO 1970. CHAP 38O, SEC. 63, SUBSEC 1.

500Metres

10 D lhalns -. - r. n ~ i

1000 ' Metres

10 20 30 40 SO 60 70

500 D 1000 2000 3000 4000

Chalnt

5000 -^ Feel

SCALE 1 :20 000

DATE OF ISSUE

AUG.-:*

TOWNSHIP

SHAWM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

TIMMINSMINING DIVISION

PORCUPINELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

COCHRANE

MinistryofNatural Management

Branch

Ontario

Dal t 1981Numb*i

G-399942A06NE3375 2,4376 SHAW 200

J

DE

LO

RO

T

WR

SH

AW

T

WR

WHITNEY TWP

SHAW TWR

546

Az cc,py

675

l O l 8

HOLLINGER ARGUS LTD

SHAW Ntfs. 2,3

GEOLOGY

Shaw Twp. Ont

SCALE * 1=2400

or

l inch to 200 feet

DRAWN BY . W, B. Caughell