Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
42AaBNWa032 2 .13677 H ISLOP 010
2.13677
GEOLOGICAL REPORT
J. P. SHERIDAN CLAIMS
HISLOP TOWNSHIP
LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION
HOLTYRE, ONTARIO
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 1990
RECEIVESNOV i 6 1990
MINING LANDS SECTION
AUTHOR CALHOUN, RORY E.
Page 2 LOCATION AND ACCESS
The property consists of two claims numbered L1033916 and L1034506. They are located in the southwest 1/4 and northwest 1/4 quarters of the south half of concession 2 Lot 1 in Hislop Township, District of Cochrane, in the Larder Lake Mining Division.
The property is accessed via highway 5/2 at a point approximately 350 feet west of the junction of highway 572 and Edward Avenue in Holtyre, Ontario. At this point the southeast corner of claim number L1033yi6 may be accessed.
OWNERSHIP
This property is owned by J. P. Sheridan of Suite 1814, 150 York Street, Toronto, Ontario.
SURVEYOR AND DATE
Mr. R. Calhoun, c/o Diepdaume Mines Ltd., P.O. Box 1392, Timmins, Ontario P4N 7N2 was assisted by M. Juby of Diepdaume Mines Ltd. This survey was done on September 3, 1990 to September 9, 1990.
DESCRIPTIONS OF FORMATIONS
These descriptions have been compiled from previous diamond drilling.
Feldspar Porphyry: -medium grey, feldspar phenocrysts from 1/8" to 1/4" isome areas of silicification.
Altered Greenstone: -medium grey to dark green, medium to coarse texture,schistose, some purple leusoxene.
Syenite: -red, massive medium grained.
GEOLOGY
No outcrop was observed along any of the traverse lines. The claims are covered by poplar, spruce and alders swamp. See map for details.
PREVIOUS EXPLORATION
Previous to 1939, To burn Mines Ltd., held option on the property while the Ross Mine was being developed. To burn sank a 30 foot pit through the overburden. After they reviewed the results from the results they dropped their option on the property.
In 1939 Sylvanite Gold Mines Ltd., drilled two holes. One on claim number L1034506 for a total of 328 feet. The other hole was collared east of this claim and drilled southwest and just into the claim on the east side. All assays returned nil assays.
Page 3Between 1947 and 1950 the Hollinger did geological mapping of claim
number L1034506 and the northeast corner of L1033916.
In 1985 Mr. H. Z. Tittley did a magnetic survey on the whole of the south half of Lot 1, Con. 2.
Giant Yellowknife Mines Ltd. staked these two claims in April of 1988. Giant Yellowknife then contacted Jensen to conduct a magnetic and a electro magnetic survey on these claims. The electromagnetic survey resulted in the outlining of nine VLF conductore and the magnetic survey did not outline any significant targets.
REFERENCES
I, R. Calhoun, am a graduate of Sir Sandford Fleming College, Lindsay, Ontario. I received a Geological Technologist diploma in 1y85 and have spent several years performing geological surveys.
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4 Government Road East, Kirkland Lake, Ontario, P2N 1A2, Assessment files.
u,
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines 42A08NW0032 2 .13677 H ISLOP 300
Ontario File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
OW
W Ob b O
Type of Survey(s).
Township or Area.
Claim Holder(s)^.
Iz. i'f- t- c- (\ Y
H,* le,, T ,, ,i. * J,
Survey Company_
Author of Report . H
Address of Author /J
Covering Dates of Survey
Total Miles of Line Cut.^
P 9 - 9 0(linecutting to office)
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical
—Electromagnetic.
—Magnetometer——
—Radiometric——
—Other^^.—-—
DAYS per claim
Geological.
Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne turveyi)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric
DATE:
(enter days per claim)
SIGNATURE - /V^L. /Authyij/of Report or Agent
Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.
Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
tprefix) (number)
6 •o
TOTAL CLAIMS-
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations.
Station interval —.—.
Profile scale —-—.—
.Number of Readings
.Line spacing -——^—
Contour interval.
(J
W Zc
Instrument
Accuracy — Scale constant.
Diurnal correction method.
Base Station check-in interval (hours).
Base Station location and value ____
z:O
O rt H U WJ
Instrument
Coil configuration
Coil separation —
Accuracy ————
Method:
Frequency_____
Parameters measured.
CD Fixed transmitter d Shoot back d In line d Parallel line
(specify V.L.F. station)
Instrument
Scale constant.
Corrections made.
O Base station value and location .
Elevation accuracy.
Ot—i
H < N
O o,p O
CO
Instrument -.^—————^
Method D Time Domain
Parameters — On time ———
- Off time
l l Frequency Domain
_ Frequency _____
_ Range ^^^—^^^—
— Delay time ^——
— Integration time
Power.
Electrode array —
Electrode spacing .
Type of electrode
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument.______________________________________—-——-—. Range.Survey Method ,^^^^^^—^^^—--^.^-—————.——.^--.——---————^.————....^^—.
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument —-^
Values measured
Energy windows (levels)^-^^^^^———————^—^^—^——^--.———————^—^^—.—
Height of instrument_____________________________Background Count. Size of detector______________________________________________
Overburden -———————^——^———————^——-^————--—.—^^^——^^———.——(type, depth — include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL EOGGING ETC.)
Type of survey^^^——^——-.^——^—.—^——^^^^
Instrument ——.——^—-.^————^^.^—^^^^^^.
Accuracy.^————^——^-^—.^-^————^——————
Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of survey(s) ——^
Instrumcnt(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)
Accuracy————^———_^___^___(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used, -^-^———-—.^——^-—.—————^^—^^—
Sensor altitude-
Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude—_______________________________..Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight________
Method of Collection————^——.
Soil Horizon Sampled.
Horizon Development-
Sample Depth——--—
Terrain————————
Drainage Development————————————
Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent CD
p.p. m. Dp. p. b. d
Cu, Pb,
Others—
Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)
Field Analysis (-
Extraction Method. Analytical Method-
Reagents Used^——
Field Laboratory Analysis
No. .———^^——.
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ———.
Extraction Method.
Analytical Method .
Reagents Used ———
Commercial Laboratory (.
Name of Laboratory ——
Extraction Method——
Analytical Method ——
Reagents Used -——.—^
.tests)
.tests)
-tests)
GeneraLGeneral.
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines Mining Lands Section
4th Floor, 159 Cedar StreetMinistere du Sudbury, Ontario Developpement du Nord P 3E 6A5 et des Mines Telephone: (705) 670-7264
Fax: (705) 670-7262
Your File: W. 9008. 323 Our File: 2. 13677
April 12, 1991
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Developmentand Mines4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2
Dear Sir/Madam:
RE: Notice of Intent dated March 12, 1991 for Geological Survey on mining claims L. 1033916 et al. in the Township of Hislop.
The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent have been approved as of the above date.
Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.
Yours sincerely,
So r/. C. GasninsJci, Provincial Manager, Mining Lands Mines fc Minerals Division
J/jl
cc: Preston Electrical S Mechanical Mr. R. CalhounToronto, Ontario Timmins, Ontario
Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, Ontario
Morth**n Dovotopmw* •ndMlriM WorttCmHtt
Ontario March 7/91
2.13677rt**
.323
Preston Electrical 4 Mechanical Ltd.Town*Mpor Aroa
Hislop Township
Typa of *urv*y and number of Aaaaaamaiit day* or*dh por claim
G*ophyilc*jl
CDL 1033916
1034506
Manriaiontatar
ftedtometrk.
Inducad polarlxatlon.
.day*
.day*
.day.
.day*
StCtlon 77 (19) SM "Mining CUIm. Am*t*d~ column
17.5
G*och*mical
Mwi d^i Q
tpadal provWon Q
Alrboma Q
Ground QQ
Q Crodlt* nav* baan r*duc*d btcoviM of partial cowaraga of dal m*.
Q Crodltt hav* baan raducad bacauM of corractiont to work data* and figurw of applicant.
SpocUI crtdltf undor toetkm 77 (18) for th* following mining claim*
No crodfo hav* boon allovyad for th* following mining claim*
Q not tuffklantly covarad by tha aurvay Q Inauffldant tachnleal data flM
Th* Mining Bacordar may raduca th* ebova cradto K naoMtary In order that the total number of approvad awawmant dayi racordad on *ach dalm do** not
xcaod tha maximum allowed a* follow*: 0*ophytlcal - at); QMloopcal - 40; Oaochamlcal - 40; Section 77(19) - 80.
Northern Development '. and Wines
Ontarvi
Report of Work Mining Act (Geophysical, Geological and Geochemical Surveys)
Instructions- Please type or print OfiC- t - —- Refer lo Section 77. the Mining Act lor assessment work requirements
and rnanmum credits allowed per survey type- If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this fom-.
attach a list- Technical Reports and maps m duplicate should be submitted to
Mining Lands Section. Mineral Development and Lands Branch
Type of Surveytsi\
Mining Division Lo^*-*- L *x k *-
Recorded Holderisi
Township or Area
-(PKbSTONAddress
,,k
Pwer-.Lie.ne.
Telephone No.
Survey Company
3Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical Report)
d f j l J - f\, L. e*, l fi o i* n. /J C* H / J 9
Dtlt of survty (from 4 loj
Credits Requested per Eatfh Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provision*
For first survey
Enter 40 days (This mclud hne cutting)
For each additional survey using the same grid
Enter 20 days i for each)
Man Days
Complete reve'se side and enter totaifsi he'e
Airborne Credits
Note: Spec a provisions cred.ts do not aoc 'f io Airborne
Total miles flown over "D^e"
O/' SO- 90
l Days pe' Geophysical Claim
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical c i*'^
- E iect'omagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Other
Geochemical
Days per Claim
Electromagnetic
' M agnetometer
Other
claim(s).Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)
^7, ^j^i^.
Mining Claim
Prefix Number
L i 033 9/6L s 031/50 1
j
Mining Claim
Prefix Number
!
ncrpIX C N* C
OCT 1
MINING LANC
Mining Claim
Prefix Number
j
1990
S SECTION
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work Z
Certification Verifying Report ofJWcrk
l he'esy cet*. ma! i ha'.e 3 persona^ anc intimate knoft'eage of the 'acts set 'orth m mis Report ol Work, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or
af*er is COT' f'Or ana annexed report 'S true
Nane ana Ajc.-ess of Person Certifying
J. P . 5 M^;Ac^ r ...-..L?
For Office Use Only
Total Days Date Recorded .si^i Cr Recorded - ^?V '
l j' l f* f -r . ^^ ^^, — . f,
1 Y ~ f j O Tor K- :sV orcfvtc Ovv\CT.^^ * juri J . r . J *^v*jUw^vTelephone No ^ vJ "T Date I CertifiiSB By (Signature)
AjL - T/ ? - ^^^^ O 1 - / b - 9 O 1 jl*f 4? rS
,..a. ,,i ,..Mining Recorder ^~ , V i *\
^ t^c^cczcL _Date Approved as Recoroed j P/eivtacial Manager, Mminc, Lands A
^ 'SEEREVISEDWORKSTATEMEMP
RfLe^15nR LAKE ^ MINING DIVISION
90 OCT 3 PPI 3 05
RECEIVED |
Assessment Work Breakdown
Man Days are based on eight (8) hour Technical or Line-cutting days. Technical days include work performed by consultants, draftsmen, etc..
Type of Survey ~(^ to } o a \ c. c- \
Technical Technical Dayt Line-cutting No. of Day* per Dayi Credits Day! Total Credit! Clairm Claim
/Y X 7 * ? g "r * 9 ? * 2 Z 1 W
Type o* Survey
Technical Dayi Credits
Line-cutting Days Total Credits
X 7
X 7
X 7
S,S"
7,
u* /l'
U
i- 0
UJo;
Z cc
2w
S
r*
ti U
(/'J
,—.
GU
IBOR
D
TWP.
>\rr""'~
XT's?
c - o i
?
FI
W
.
a , J
;© ^ ,*v o
• oo
f\o
CMo
Q."
>-
S n
.----•"-S.H
-
^•^
x"N
-on.
(^-"v-
n.r-
i' A
s. ifl
" UJ
N
w x. '
n f
VK
^a
oo
e /v
! -l
PO
: LI
H t** •--^r-1-
~'.' ^
;'.
* l
. '^
--
V" ^
!t
' w
' '-\
: vs^.
i-
fi r,
- *^
±i
" fl
. T
V—
-- ——
--,1 J
J
^ '.
r ~
rf"~^ \
"'' ^i
. m
i -
:S
i i
ffi .
i si i
*
. i'
S
- o
w
. "-
* !
'- '
?'
?
g
, '
S!
J
i SV
1 i'
- 2 ;
-. g
-1 "
-J i
- ..A
j -
-i. . :
! \
: ':
l rt
. Ji
- ;
t\ i
,- :
i s
5 ,--'
i t
\\l '
-:LJ
J-
- 1- n
/ :
- rv
! rv V
i o
:-i
! r l
'^-^
i
:' !
^ '.
r— -^'
: '7
'Mft
( '
- ^AS ;\ :
Oo
crO
JV,v'.j^
wo
S L
s ;
j c
^'..-x--y
-L.J^"\
^^
n0
:--^-^
"^\
H^^.^
l^^^
o
; r-.s
o,**s
o .
tt
! -av
O^s
^
't
'O^' 7', co
oo
offi
r-o
^,
oo
f**o
oo
r* r
^•^iz.
of O
oo
'N-
W
Q."
^^
Oi-H
O
.
X c
O'' ["
* ,rt " "' -1C.*i
l i
.i' J
' (U
'
'
O
C