35
Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7

Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Geography Project 2014 -1

Group7

Page 2: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

1.Details2.Aims3.Variables4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology6.Comparison 7.Evaluation8.Conclusion

Agenda

Page 3: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Details:

• Ian Ng (23) - Group Leader and Measurer

• Fan Kai Sheng (08) - Results Recorder

• Heng Wei (11) - Results Recorder

• Dragon Chew (04) - Photographer

Page 4: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

AimTo investigate the effects of solar radiation (heat) on air temperature at a given height.

To find out if concrete areas are hotter than non-concrete areas.

Page 5: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Hypothesis, Rationale & Counter Proposal

• As the proximity to concrete surfaces increases, the air temperature increases due to the heat retained and trapped by the concrete.

• The further it is from the ground, and therefore, the closer it is to the sun, it gets hotter as the sun rays are shone directly, thus causing the air to heat up faster.

Page 6: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

VariablesCONSTANT

1. Height from surface (15cm, 1m)

2. Testing Grounds

INDEPENDENT

1. Surface material (Concrete, rubber, grass & soil)

2. Clouds, presence of water, vegetation, dust particles

need to further analyse your data and use it as an evidence to accept or reject hypothesis

Page 7: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

MethodologyAnd Pictures of Site

Page 8: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

WeatherDAY 1:

SUNNY, HOT, CLOUDLESS, WINDLESS

DAY 2:

LESS SUNNY, LESS HOT, CLOUDY, WINDY

Page 9: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Top Floor Of Multi Storey Car Park - Site ASurrounded by concrete and cars. Open-air with little shelter. Highest elevation point among testing grounds.

Some cars were dusty and thus, trapping heat. The concrete floor was very hot to human touch.

Page 10: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Garden Outside Printing Centre - Site BLush vegetation in surrounding with only a path walk made from concrete. School buildings 50m away doesn't provide much shade.

Page 11: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Open Space Between Block C and Canteen - Site C

Surface material was grass and soil with concrete paving 10 m away. Not much shelter with open air concept.

Page 12: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Terraces - Site DMade out of concrete. Trees located at the top of terraces, about 25m away from testing point. Rubber track is located 25m down and field with grass and soil about 70m out.

The vegetation and synthetic material don’t really trap heat and there is hardly any shade.

Page 13: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Field - Site E Surrounded by grass. From testing point at centre of the arena, it is 50m from the track and about a 100m from the concrete terraces.

It is open air with no shelter, tall trees or buildings.

Page 14: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Running Track - Site FMade up of synthetic rubber which is a poor conductor of heat. Located 5 m from field and concrete terraces in the middle.

The field has vegetation which cools it down while the concrete does the opposite.

Page 15: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Fountain Area Outside General Office - Site G

The site is located a metre away from water source. Temperature may be affected by already-existing evaporated water vapour. So, it is lowered as the surrounding air loses heat to them.

The floor is made out of stone, and thus, a poor conductor. Some shrubs nearby but hardly any shelter.

Page 16: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Comparisons Conclusions And Evaluations

Page 17: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Table

Page 18: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Inference

Based on average, both heights for day 1, the order from hottest to coolest is: F, E, D, A, B, C, G.

For day 2, its is: E, F, C, D, A, B, G.

But general air temperature, regardless of height, it is: E, F, C, D, A, B, G.

Page 19: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

ResultsThe hottest area turned out to be the field area and running track though it has vegetation.

The concrete areas of the Car Park and Terraces disappointed, coming in in the middle places.

The worst was the area next to the fountain.

Page 20: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

EvaluationOur 2nd aim was answered, that not necessarily are concrete places hotter than and non-concrete places.

It is also unanimously shown that it is hotter further from ground than that of further away.

Also, water affects the air temperature the most.

Page 21: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

ConclusionOnly our second hypothesis was correct and not our first. We suspect it is because the concrete retains and traps heat in the actual pavement, but being a poor conductor of heat, it releases heat and warms the surrounding air at very slow rate.

This is unexpected. We think it is because of the cloud cover which reflected more rays, thus resulting in the anomaly.

Page 22: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

EndThank You

Page 23: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Garden Outside Printing Centre - Site BLush vegetation in surrounding with only a path walk made from concrete. School buildings 50m away doesn't provide much shade.

Page 24: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Open Space Between Block C and Canteen - Site C

Surface material was grass and soil with concrete paving 10 m away. Not much shelter with open air concept.

Page 25: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Terraces - Site DMade out of concrete. Trees located at the top of terraces, about 25m away from testing point. Rubber track is located 25m down and field with grass and soil about 70m out.

The vegetation and synthetic material don’t really trap heat and there is hardly any shade.

Page 26: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Field - Site E Surrounded by grass. From testing point at centre of the arena, it is 50m from the track and about a 100m from the concrete terraces.

It is open air with no shelter, tall trees or buildings.

Page 27: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Running Track - Site FMade up of synthetic rubber which is a poor conductor of heat. Located 5 m from field and concrete terraces in the middle.

The field has vegetation which cools it down while the concrete does the opposite.

Page 28: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Fountain Area Outside General Office - Site G

The site is located a metre away from water source. Temperature may be affected by already-existing evaporated water vapour. So, it is lowered as the surrounding air loses heat to them.

The floor is made out of stone, and thus, a poor conductor. Some shrubs nearby but hardly any shelter.

Page 29: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Comparisons Conclusions And Evaluations

Page 30: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Table

Page 31: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

Inference

Based on average, both heights for day 1, the order from hottest to coolest is: F, E, D, A, B, C, G.

For day 2, its is: E, F, C, D, A, B, G.

But general air temperature, regardless of height, it is: E, F, C, D, A, B, G.

Page 32: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

ResultsThe hottest area turned out to be the field area and running track though it has vegetation.

The concrete areas of the Car Park and Terraces disappointed, coming in in the middle places.

The worst was the area next to the fountain.

Page 33: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

EvaluationOur 2nd aim was answered, that not necessarily are concrete places hotter than and non-concrete places.

It is also unanimously shown that it is hotter further from ground than that of further away.

Also, water affects the air temperature the most.

Page 34: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

ConclusionOnly our second hypothesis was correct and not our first. We suspect it is because the concrete retains and traps heat in the actual pavement, but being a poor conductor of heat, it releases heat and warms the surrounding air at very slow rate.

This is unexpected. We think it is because of the cloud cover which reflected more rays, thus resulting in the anomaly.

Page 35: Geography Project 2014 -1 Group7. 1.Details 2.Aims 3.Variables 4.Hypothesis & Rationale 5.Methodology 6.Comparison 7.Evaluation 8.Conclusion Agenda

EndThank You