GEO projects on Georisk in Pavia, Italy

GEO projects on Georiskin Pavia, Italy

Fabio Dell’AcquaEUCENTRE & University of Pavia, Italy

Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Principal

The IX GEO Plenary – 22-23 Nov 2012 – Foz do Iguaçu, BrazilEuropean Commission Side Event

Outline

• introduction: the involved institutions• EU projects in Pavia:

– SENSUM;– MarSite;

• other projects– the Global Earthquake Model (GEM)

• Conclusions

IX GEO Plenary – 22-23 Nov 2012 – Foz do Iguaçu, BrazilEuropean Commission Side Event

Introduction

• EUCENTRE facts– the European Centre for Training and Research in

Earthquake Engineering– founded in 2003 by

• the Italian Civil Protection Department (DPC)• the Italian National research institute on geophysics

(INGV)• the University of Pavia, Italy• the University Institute for Advanced Studies (IUSS)


• EUCENTRE features the largest shaking table in Europe (TREES Lab)

• 11 specialized sections working on several FP7 research projects


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RxOmgpavnc&feature=relmfu

Aerospace

• The Aerospace Section of EUCENTRE:– staff experienced in Remote Sensing (>10 yrs)– project “SAFER” (GMES Emergency Services)

• Currently:– deep involvement in GEO and SuperSites initiative– two FP7 GEO-Related projects: SENSUM and

MARSITE


Framework to integrate Space-based and in-situ sENSing for dynamic vUlnerability and recovery Monitoring

M. Wieland, M. Pittore

Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for GeosciencesSection 2.1 Earthquake Risk and Early Warning


7

Background

Funding: EU, FP7 research project

Work programme topic: Support to emergency response management (SPA.2012.1.1-04)

Project duration: 24 months

Project start: 1. January 2013

Project lead: GFZ Potsdam

IGEES of the Academy of Sciences, Republic of Tajikistan


Motivation

• Explosive urban growth in the last decades

• Urban areas are concentrations of people and goods subject to various types of risk

• Pretty clear on the Central Asia case studies• Bishkek, Kyrghyzystan• Dushambe, Tajikistan


9

Objectives of the project

Provide analysis and mapping tools for continuous vulnerability assessment and analysis.

Exploring the application of the most advanced remote sensing and in-situ methodologies and techniques.

Exemplifying the application of the methodologies and tools developed within the project to seismic and landslide hazards.

Addressing the application of space technologies and the methodologies developed within the project to the monitoring of the recovery phase.

Thoroughly validating the scientific and technical outcomes of the project.

Setting up and fostering an effective cross-border cooperation between Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.

Disseminating results to both European and non-European risk communities.


10

Work packages


11

Remote sensing and in-situ data collection and processing for dynamic indicator analysis (WP2) Implementation of remote sensing methods to extract indicators for a dynamic(vulnerability and recovery/reconstruction) monitoring framework.

Existing products (GMES) Further develop existing processing chains

Urban Structure Types

Urban Structure Type: 10Type: 3-6 storey brick, concrete, panelAge: built before 1977

Urban Structure Type: 8Type: 1-2 storey masonry, brickAge: built between 1994 and 2009

Urban feature extraction

Pre-processing

Classification

Segmentation

Refinement

- Free and open-source solutions (FOSS)

- Time- and cost-efficient, automation.

- Standardized, transferable, scalable.

12

Remote sensing and in-situ data collection and processing for dynamic indicator analysis (WP2) Implementation of efficient in-situ data collection using ground-based imaging.

360°

180°

Automated feature extractionManual feature extraction

Omnidirectional images

13

Remote sensing and in-situ data collection and processing for dynamic indicator analysis (WP2) Implementation of change-detection methods to monitor evolution of indicators.

2. Supervised change-detection- to analyse evolution of indicators. - to trigger update of sampling framework.- to trigger and guide new in-situ data collection.

1. Unsupervised change-detection - for a continuous monitoring. - detect if and where changes occur (uncertainty aware).- trigger more detailed supervised change-detection.

Osh

Jalalabad

Until now: sparse single time-step analysis

SENSUM: dense time-series analysis

t

14

Multi-resolution dynamic sampling and integration framework (WP3) Schema of operational flow


15

Multi-hazard exemplification: seismic and landslide risk (WP4)

Planning of indicator-based monitoring actions for earthquake and landslide hazards

Enduser needs assessment and data availability check for test cases.

Identify hazard-dependent indicators for vulnerability assessments.

Development of a prototype vulnerability monitoring framework for seismic andlandslide risk

Adjust sampling framework and develop focus maps for test cases.

Extract indicators for landslide and earthquake hazard in areas and scalesidentified with focus maps using remote sensing.

Extract indicators for landslide and earthquake hazard on per building scalein areas identified with focus maps using in-situ tools.

16

Integration of the multi-scale dynamic vulnerability information extraction framework into early recovery planning, monitoring and evaluation (WP5) Demonstrate mapping products for recovery planning, monitoring and evaluation

source: http://www.carltd.com/sites/carwebsite/files/Disaster%20Recovery%20Flier.pdfsource: http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu


17

Expected impact – most relevant points

SENSUM is in line with GEO DI-01 work plan and will contribute to the operational capacities of GMES

Providing innovative strategies for collecting and integrating information from remote sensing and in-situ observations, in an adaptive, multi-resolution framework

Continuous monitoring of vulnerability and recovery indicators.

SENSUM specifically targets civil protection authorities as end users – anyone interested?

Free and open-source software (FOSS) – thinking of a Community - anyone wants to join in?


MARSITE

New Directions in Seismic Hazard Assessmentthrough Focused Earth Observation

in the Marmara Supersite(FP7 – Environment)


SuperSites

http://supersites.earthobservations.org/

Provision of data for the study of natural hazards in geologically active regions


Marmara Supersite

• The MARsite project proposes to identify the Marmara region as a ‘Supersite’ within European initiatives to aggregate:– on-shore, off-shore and space-based observations– comprehensive geophysical monitoring– improved hazard and risk assessments

all encompassed in an integrated set of activities to respond to all priorities identified in the ENV.2012.6.4-2 call.


MARSITE

• FP7 Collaborative project, 8 M€ cost• Coordinated by KOERI – Istanbul, Turkey• 22 partners, 7 countries• started 1st Nov 2012 – 3 years

• MAR site aims to coordinate different scientific skills from seismology through engineering to geochemistry


Participant no. Participant organisation name Country

1 - Coordinator KOERI (Bogazici University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute) Turkey

2 GFZ (Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum) Germany

3 TUBITAK (The Scientific & Technological Research Council of Turkey) Turkey

4 IFREMER (Research Institute for Exploration of the Sea ) France

5 INGV (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia) Italy

6 IU (Istanbul University) Turkey

7 KOU (Kocaeli University) Turkey

8 ITU (Istanbul Technical University) Turkey

9 CNR (The National Research Council) Italy

10 BRGM (Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières) France

11 Eucentre (European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering) Italy

12 CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique) France

13 INERIS (French National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks) France

14 AMRA (Analysis and Monitoring of Environmental Risk) Italy

15 EMSC (European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre) France

16 ESA (European Space Agency) Netherland

17 Univ. of Pavia Italy

18 IFSTTAR (French Institute of Science and Technology devoted to Transport, Planning and Networks) France

19 GURALP Systems Ltd UK20 DAIMAR s.r.l. Italy21 SARMAP s.a. Switzerland

Rich in-situ component


Strategic objectives

• Achieve long-term hazard monitoring and evaluation by in-situ + space-based observation techniques

• Improve existing earthquake early-warning and rapid-response systems by joining competences, knowledge and experts from Europe



• Improve ground shaking and displacement modelling

• Interact with end users and contribute to the improvement of existing policies and programs on preparedness, risk mitigation and emergency management.



• Build on past and on-going European projects (e.g. TERRAFIRMA, PREVIEW, LESSLOSS, NERIES, SERIES, TRANSFER, SHARE, SYNER-G, TRIDEC, NERA and REAKT)

• Complement and integrate actions in progress in EPOS, EMSO and GEO


GEM

The Global Earthquake Model a GEO Participating organization


What is GEM?

GEM is a global collaborative effort that aims to provide organisations and people with tools and resources for transparent assessment of earthquake risk anywhere in the world.

By pooling data, knowledge and people, GEM acts as an international forum for collaboration and exchange, and leverages the knowledge of

leading experts for the benefit of society.IX GEO Plenary – 22-23 Nov 2012 – Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil

European Commission Side Event

Working together to assess risk

Global Framework

(tools, data, methods)

Regional and National programmes & collaborations

(data, methods)

Organisations and individuals

(data, results) OpenQuake

Calculate, Share, Explore

tools & resources for assessing and quantifying earthquake risk worldwide

A growing effort driven by a non-profit public-private partnership

10+ private organisations

15+ public agencies

8+ international bodies

(1) global data, methods, guidelines and tools

(2) linking up with and facilitating regional initiatives

(3) open-source platform and (software) tools (4) knowledge sharing &

technology transfer

250 individuals, 65 organisations+ community

250 individuals, 90 organisations+ community

20 individuals, 4 organisations + open-source community & users

How is GEM different?

‣ assessing risk based on (the latest) science

‣ a framework and platform for collaboration, sharing

data and knowledge and hereby joint learning –

worldwide

‣ open-source (software) tools, transparency in

methods and process and independent outcomes


A holistic approach: looking at ‘total risk’


Links with GEO and the GEO community

We are developing several global databases as basis for risk assessment. Having data on the elements at risk from earthquakes is essential for accurate risk assessment. For this reason, the Global Exposure Database (GED) is being developed by an international consortium of experts and expert organisations.

GED is a database of (the distribution of) buildings, building types and and their value worldwide, at different resolutions [from country to building-by-building level].

multi-scale multi-stakeholder multi-disciplinary multi-use (potentially) multi-hazard

OpenQuakeRisk Assessment Platform

Mapping SchemesTool

Global Exposure Database

EarthquakeConsequences Database

Remote Sensing Tools

Sampling & FieldTools

Links with GEO and the GEO community

Another consortium is developing open-source tools to extract data from remote sensing as input to the Global Exposure Database, and also as input to the Global Consequences Database; a database of all damage and loss data following earthquakes.

Conclusions

• At least three institutions in Pavia are working with GEO (University, EUCENTRE, GEM) on different aspects

• Strong interaction between GEO actions

• Way to acquiring a broader view and making sensible proposals


Obrigado pela sua atenção!

(thank you for your attention!)


Documents

GEO projects on Georisk in Pavia, Italy