19
Quin Nee Wong, Sean Mayes, Sandy Hwei San, Chiew Foan Chin, Festo Massawe 1 Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus) for increased productivity and nutritional security

Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

Quin Nee Wong, Sean Mayes,

Sandy Hwei San, Chiew Foan

Chin, Festo Massawe

1

Genetic improvement of

winged bean

(Psophocarpus

tetragonolobus)

for increased productivity

and nutritional security

Page 2: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

2

Winged bean-perennial vine grows

in hot, humid equatorial countries.

Introduction: winged bean

Studies from Africa:

-Selection of drought tolerant

varieties (Karikari, 1977)

-Comparison on nutritional contents

of winged bean with other legumes

(Mnembuka & Eggum, 1995)

Mostly grown in Papua New

Guinea, Indonesia, Malaysia,

Thailand and Sri Lanka

Page 3: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

3

• Nitrogen fixation efficiency

comparable to ureide-transporting

legumes such as Desmodium, Siratro

and soybean (Yoneyama et al., 1986).

Winged bean and its benefits

• Multipurpose—grown for pulse,

vegetable and tuber.

• Young pods are the most popular

edible part.

• Mature seeds are most nutritious—

o Comparable protein content to

soybean (Mnembuka & Eggum,

1995).

o Oil content comparable to

soybean and fatty acid

composition comparable to peanut

oil (Khor et al., 1981)

Page 4: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

4

Problems of growing winged bean

• Indeterminate growth habit.

• Home consumption and income generation.

• Need to develop new improved varieties - high yielding and

determinate growth habit.

“Increase harvest index”

Page 5: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

5

• To conduct comparative genomics study based on massive parallel

transcriptome with model legumes.

• To evaluate differential genotypic expression profile during

reproductive development using microarray technology.

Specific objectives

• To evaluate morpho-physiological traits of 24 contrasting winged

bean accessions.

• To identify simple sequence repeats (SSR) from transcriptome

dataset for use in genetic diversity studies.

Page 6: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

6

Accession Country of origin Climate

M2 Malaysia Tropical

M3 Malaysia Tropical

M4 Malaysia Tropical

M6 Malaysia Tropical

M7 Malaysia Tropical

M8 Malaysia Tropical

T5 Nigeria Tropical

T9 Dr. T.N.Kahn (1973) -

T10 Papua New Guinea Tropical

T12 Liberia Tropical

T14 Indonesia Tropical

T15 Indonesia Tropical

T16 Indonesia Tropical

T17 Indonesia Tropical

T18 Dr. D Nangju (1976) -

T19 Nigeria Tropical

T22 Papua New Guinea Tropical

T26 Nigeria Tropical

T31 Indonesia Tropical

T33 Unknown -

T51 Bangladesh Tropical

T53 Bangladesh Tropical

319 Sri lanka Tropical (coastal region)

271 Sri lanka Tropical (coastal region)

List of plant materials

Page 7: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

7

Morpho-physiological characterization

• Location: Semenyih Malaysia

(Temp: 27ºC and RH: 80%)

• Duration: 20 weeks

Week 4

Page 8: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

8

Morpho-physiological characterization

Week 4 Week 8

Page 9: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

9

Morpho-physiological characterization

Week 8 Week 15

Page 10: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

10

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

T9 T10 T51 T53 319

Harvest index

Minimum

Range

Maximum

• Across the germplasm, accession 319 has the highest harvest index

followed by T51, T53, T9 and T10.

• Significant variations between (F pr.<0.05) and within (t<0.05) the

accessions would suggest that yield improvement is possible

through selection of accession and better material within accession.

• Based on the range values, individual plants within 319 showed

better consistency in yielding.

Page 11: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

11

What if we relate harvest index to flowering time?

• 319 showed highest

harvest index and earliest

to achieve 50% flowering.

319

Fitted and observed relationship with 95% confidence limits

T51

T12

T53

T14

M2

T15

M4T16

M7

T17

T18 T9

T19

24

T22

M6T5

T10

M3M8

T26

T31

T33

0.25

0

20

0.35

40

60

0.15

80

0.050.00

100

120

140

0.300.10 0.20

%5

0%

_fl

ow

erin

g

Harvest_index

• Inverse relation-earlier

flowering was

associated with higher

harvest index.

Page 12: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

M4

M2

T16

Fitted and observed relationship with 95% confidence limits

T15

319

T14

T51

T12

T31

T10

T22T9

T18

T5

271

M8

T19

T17

T53T26M7

M6

M3

T33

0.15

10.0

0.35

12.5

0.25

15.0

17.5

0.050.00

20.0

22.5

25.0

27.5

30.0

0.200.10 0.30

nu

mb

er_of_

bra

nch

es

Harvest_index 12

What if we relate harvest index to side branches?

• 319 showed highest

harvest index and

lowest number of side

branches.

• Not strongly correlated

Page 13: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

13

• Cernusak et al. (2011) showed

photosynthetic responses to elevated

CO2–closely related to their capacity of

nodule formation.

• Elevated CO2 most significantly enhance

photosynthetic rate of T22 and probably

the harvest index (Liu et al., 2012).

Accession Photosynthetic rate

at 800 µ mol CO2

M2 *80.253

M3 *39.415

M4 33.527

M6 *51.790

M7 *45.031

M8 23.255

T5 *60.478

T9 *42.541

T10 *40.532

T12 *47.385

T14 *42.695

T15 *51.996

T16 58.757

T17 **38.411

T18 *47.015

T19 *66.572

T22 *83.760

T26 *39.415

T31 *53.486

T33 *70.653

T51 *37.286

T53 **25.326

319 **53.928

271 71.428

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

400 300 200 100 50 400 400 600 800

Ph

oto

syn

thet

ic r

ate

mo

l

CO

2 m

-2 s

-1)

Reference CO2 (µ mol)

Average response curve

Page 14: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

14

• Accession 319 was superior over other accessions in possession of

high harvest index and reduced bushiness.

• Under the same growing conditions, significant differences between

and within accessions would suggest that for future improvement we

will need to select better accession and better material within the

accession.

Summarizing morpho-physiological

characterization

Page 15: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

15

Transcriptome sequencing

RNA samples (Malaysian accessions) • Leaf • Root • Reproductive (pod, bud, flower)

Trizol Extraction

Paired end Mi-Seq sequencing

3857 SSR sequence loci detected

Motif Mono Di Tri Tetra Penta Hexa

Number of

SSRs 2103 738 786 29 10 191

Genetic diversity analysis

Page 16: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

Conclusion

16

Based on morpho-physiological evaluations:

• Variations exist between and within accessions – opportunity for

future winged bean improvement programme.

• A number of accessions showed superior characters e.g.

accession 319 was superior over the other accessions - highest

harvest index, earliest flowering time and lowest number of side

branches.

Combined morpho-physiological and genomic data will serve as

resources for winged bean breeding programmes to increase

productivity.

Page 17: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

17

Policy Implications

• Winged bean is a multipurpose crop and has high nutritional contents-potential alternative crop for food and nutritional security.

• Indeterminate growth habit and lack of improved varieties

– major production constraints.

• Improved varieties of winged bean will increase crop’s popularity and elevate its importance for food and nutrition security.

Page 18: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

18

Acknowledgement

Funding:

Kuok Foundation Berhad

University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus

Seeds contribution:

International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)

Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute

(MARDI)

Our Research collaborators in Sri Lanka

Page 19: Genetic improvement of winged bean (Psophocarpus

Bibliography:

• Mnembuka, B.V. & Eggum, B.O. (1995). Comparative nutritive value of winged bean

(Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.) and other legumes grown in Tanzania. Plant

Foods for Human Nutrition, 47, 333-339

• Khor, H.T., Tan, N.H. & Wong, K.C. (1982). The protein, trypsin inhibitor and lipid of

the winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.) seeds. Journal Science Food

Agriculture, 33, 996-1000

• Cernusak, L.A., Winter, K., Martinez, C., Correa, E., Aranda, J., Garcia, M., Jaramillo,

C. & Turner, B. (2011). Responses of legume versus non-legume tropical tree

seedlings to elevates [CO2]. The American Society of Plant Biologists, 157(1), 372-

385

• Liu, G., Yang, C., Xu, K., Zhang, Z., Li, D., Wu, Z. & Chen, Z. (2012). Development

of yield and some photosynthetic characteristics during 82 years of genetic

improvement of soybean genotypes in northeast China. Australian Journal of Crop

Science, 6(10), 1416-1422

• Yoneyama, T., Fujita, K., Yoshida, T., Matsumoto, T., Kambayashi, I. & Yazaki, J.

(1986). Variation in natural abundance of 15N among plant parts and in 15N/14N

fractionation during N2 fixation in legume-rhizobia symbiotic system. Plant Cell

Physiology, 27(5), 791-79

• Karikari, S.K. (1978). Characters in the selection of winged beans (Psophocarpus

tetragonolobus (L) DC tolerant to drought. Acta Hort. (ISHS), 84, 19-22

http://www.actahort.org/books/84/84_1.htm

19