Generic and Brand

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Generic and Brand

    1/4

    T Ama Jual fGastroenteroloGy Volume 106 | june 2011 www.amjgastro.com

    atr pbishig grpThe red secTion18

    Introduction

    Once patent exclusivity o a brand-name

    drug expires, an application or generic-drug approval can be submitted to the US

    Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

    (1,2). Te FDA publishes a list o brand-

    name drugs whose patent protection has

    expired in Approved Drug Products With

    Terapeutic Equivalence Evaluations,

    commonly known as the Orange Book (3).

    It identies drug products approved by the

    FDA or saety and eectiveness that are

    considered pharmaceutical equivalents

    when administered to patients under con-

    ditions specied in the drugs labeling. Wereview similarities and dierences between

    the FDAs approval processes or generic

    and brand-name drugs.

    Similarities between generic and brand-

    name drugs

    Generic drugs are essentially the same as

    brand-name drugs, with regard to intended

    indication/use, active ingredients, dosage

    orm and strength, route o administra-

    tion, saety, quality, perormance, purity,

    and stability. Te FDA classies generic

    drugs as therapeutically equivalent to

    brand-name drugs when the products

    have been determined to be sae and eec-

    tive or a specic indication and are con-

    sidered to be pharmaceutically equivalent,i.e., they contain identical amounts o the

    same active drug ingredient, in the same

    dosage orm and route o administration,

    and meet US Pharmacopeia (USP) com-

    pendia standards. Te generic drug must

    be bioequivalent to the brand-name drug,

    be adequately labeled or proper use, and

    be manuactured in compliance with cur-

    rent good manuacturing practice (GMP)

    regulations. Te FDA considers drugs

    therapeutically equivalent even though

    they may dier in characteristics such astablet shape, scoring, packaging, excipi-

    ents (e.g., colors, avors, and preserva-

    tives), and expiration dating or storage

    conditions. Although such dierences

    may be important in the care o a particu-

    lar patient, and it may be appropriate or

    the prescribing physician to require that a

    particular brand be dispensed as a medical

    necessity, the FDA believes that products

    classied as therapeutically equivalent can

    be substituted with the expectation that

    the substituted product will produce the

    same clinical eect and saety prole as the

    prescribed product.

    In general, the FDA approval applica-

    tions or both generic and new brand-name

    drugs are required to provide detailed

    inormation on the products chemistry,

    manuacturing steps, and quality con-

    trol measures, as well as compliance with

    ederal regulations or current GMP (4).

    Manuacturers o both generic and brand-

    name drugs are required to demonstrate

    evidence o the drugs stability, as indi-

    cated on the product label, and maintain

    ongoing monitoring o the drugs shel lie.

    Detailed chemistry, manuacturing, andcontrol (CMC) inormation is required or

    both the drug substance (active ingredi-

    ent), e.g., omeprazole, and the drug prod-

    uct (nal drug orm administered to the

    patient), e.g., Prilosec, which includes all o

    the inactive components used in the nal

    drug product. Drug manuacturers are also

    required to evaluate whether the drugs or

    the manuacturing process, including any

    waste discharge, will have any environmen-

    tal impact, and to have a plan to mitigate

    it. Likewise, the raw materials and nishedproducts o both generic and brand-name

    drugs are required to meet USP compen-

    dia specications o strength and quality

    (5). Te USP is a nongovernmental, ocial

    public standards-setting authority or pre-

    scription and over-the-counter medicines

    manuactured or sold in the United States.

    Te Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act o 1938

    requires that all prescription and over-the-

    counter medicines sold in the United States

    comply with quality standards published in

    the USP National Formulary. Ultimately,

    these FDA requirements result in drug

    product labels or both generic and brand-

    name drugs that are indistinguishable.

    Differences between generic and brand-

    name drugs

    A brand-name drug is supplied by one

    company and sold under a trademarked

    name, e.g., Prilosec. Generic drugs may

    be supplied by more than one com-

    pany and sold under the name(s) o the

    active ingredient(s), e.g., omeprazole. An

    The FDAs Generic-Drug Approval Process:

    Similarities to and Differences FromBrand-Name Drugs

    Costas H. Kealas, MD, FACG, FASGE, AGAF1,2, Arthur A. Ciociola, PhD3 and the FDA-Related Matters Committee o the American Collegeo Gastroenterology4

    Am J Gastroenterol2011;106:10181021; doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.29

    1Department o Internal Medicine, Northeast

    Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio,

    USA; 2Akron Digestive Disease Consultants

    Inc., Akron, Ohio, USA; 3Global Vice President

    Pharmaceutical Regulatory Strategy, Process and

    Policy, Bausch+Lomb, Madison, New Jersey, USA;4Committee members who provided peer review are

    listed in the Acknowledgments. Correspondence:

    Costas H. Kealas, MD, FACG, FASGE, AGAF, Akron

    Digestive Disease Consultants Inc., 570 White Pond

    Drive, Suite 100, Akron, Ohio 44320, USA. E-mail:

    [email protected]

  • 8/6/2019 Generic and Brand

    2/4

    2011 by th Arica Cg f Gastrtrgy T Ama Jual fGastroenteroloGy

    The red secTion 10

    are necessary to demonstrate the sae and

    eective use o the drug in the planned

    patient population. In general, these clini-

    cal studies include clinical saety, pharma-

    cokinetic, and bioavailability studies in

    healthy human volunteers (phase I stud-

    ies); proo-o-concept studies showing

    the drug may be eective in treating the

    specic disease (phase IIa studies); dose-

    ranging studies to dene the lowest eec-

    tive dose (phase IIb studies); and large,

    well-controlled studies evaluating drug

    saety and ecacy (phase III studies).

    Te number o clinical studies needed or

    approval varies by therapeutic indication

    and availability o other adequate treat-

    ments or the disease (6).

    FDA approval o generic drugs requiresthe applicant drug company to supply the

    proposed drug label, CMC inormation

    (6), and bioavailability and bioequivalence

    data or the generic drug. A side-by-side

    label comparison o the generic and brand-

    name drugs is required in the application,

    with any dierences in labels annotated

    and justied.

    Te Drug Price Competition and Pat-

    ent erm Restoration Act o 1984 provides

    the FDA with legal authority to approve

    generic drugs using adequate bioavailabil-ity and bioequivalence data (7). Te Code

    o Federal Regulations denes bioavail-

    ability and bioequivalence requirements

    or generic-drug market approval (8).

    In an eort to urther interpret both this

    Code and the 1984 law, the FDA issued a

    document in 2003 entitled Bioavailabil-

    ity and Bioequivalence Studies or Orally

    Administered Drug ProductsGeneral

    Considerations (9). Tis document pro-

    vides guidance or the requirements and

    process that a drug company must ollow

    when applying or generic-drug market

    approval. Te 1984 law, the Code o Fed-

    eral Regulations, and the 2003 FDA guid-

    ance document all require that or a generic

    drug to be approved or sale to the public,

    the drug company must provide bioavail-

    ability data, and the FDA must conclude

    the drug is bioequivalent to a brand-name

    drug (79).

    Bioavailability studies are conducted in

    a small number o normal adult volun-

    teers to evaluate the perormance o the

    absorption, when studied under condi-

    tions similar to those used with the re-

    erence brand-name drug. Tis is usually

    demonstrated in small clinical studies

    with normal human volunteers. Bioequiv-

    alence is determined by a variety o means,

    including pharmacokinetic studies, phar-

    macodynamic studies, comparative clini-

    cal trials, and/or in vitro studies.

    A manuacturer applying or FDA

    approval o a brand-name drug must con-

    duct a series o animal and in vitro studies

    evaluating the pharmacology and toxicol-

    ogy o the drug beore opening an investi-

    gational new-drug application to conduct

    human clinical studies. Subsequently,

    adequate, well-controlled clinical studies

    application or a brand-name drug must

    include evidence showing the drug can be

    saely used and is eective in the proposed

    patient population. Such evidence may

    require testing in hundreds o animals

    and the treatment o tens o thousands

    o patients beore a brand-name drug

    can be approved by the FDA. A generic-

    drug application, however, does not have

    to demonstrate any preclinical or clini-

    cal saety or ecacy data in the intended

    patient population but need only demon-

    strate bioavailability and bioequivalence

    to the brand-name drug. o be consid-

    ered bioequivalent to a brand-name drug,

    the generic drug must show similar bio-

    availability, dened as rate and extent o

    Table 1. Commonly prescribed FDA-approved generic gastrointestinal drugs

    Generic name Brand name

    Atropine Atropen

    Atropine/diphenoxylate Lomotil

    Azathioprine Imuran

    Balsalazide Colazal

    Calcium acetate PhosLo

    Cholestyramine Questran

    Cimetidine Tagamet

    Cyclosporine Sandimmune

    Dicyclomine Bentyl

    Dronabinol Marinol

    Famotidine Pepcid

    Glycopyrrolate Robinul

    Granisetron Kytril

    Hyoscyamine Levsin

    Hyoscyamine extended-release Levbid, Levsinex

    Lactulose Constulose

    Lansoprazole Prevacid

    Loperamide Imodium

    Meclizine Antivert

    Mesalamine enema Rowasa

    Methylprednisolone Medrol

    Metoclopramide Reglan

    Misoprostol Cytotec

    Nizatidine Axid

    Octreotide Sandostatin

    Omeprazole delayed-release Prilosec

    Ondansetron Zoran

    Pantoprazole delayed-release Protonix

    Polyethylene glycol 3350 NuLytely

    Prochlorperazine CompazinePromethazine Phenergan

    Ranitidine Zantac

    Sucralate Caraate

    Sulasalazine Azulfdine

    Ursodiol Actigall

  • 8/6/2019 Generic and Brand

    3/4

  • 8/6/2019 Generic and Brand

    4/4

    2011 by th Arica Cg f Gastrtrgy T Ama Jual fGastroenteroloGy

    The red secTion 10

    accessdata.da.gov/scripts/cdrh/cdocs/cCFR/CFRSearch.cm?r=320.24> (1 April 2010).

    9. US Food and Drug Administration. Centeror Drug Evaluation and Research, Divisiono Drug Inormation. Guidance or Industry:Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies or

    Orally Administered Drug ProductsGeneralConsiderations. BP, Revision 1 (March2003).

    10. US Food and Drug Administration. SummaryMinutes o the Advisory Committee or Phar-maceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology,Silver Spring, MD, 13 April 2010 (summary minutesapproved 28 April 2010).

    REFERENCES1. Code o Federal Regulations itle 21, Vol 5,

    Chapter 1, Subchapter D, Part 314: Applica-tions or FDA Approval to Market a New Drug