Upload
amr-el-refaey
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 Generic and Brand
1/4
T Ama Jual fGastroenteroloGy Volume 106 | june 2011 www.amjgastro.com
atr pbishig grpThe red secTion18
Introduction
Once patent exclusivity o a brand-name
drug expires, an application or generic-drug approval can be submitted to the US
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
(1,2). Te FDA publishes a list o brand-
name drugs whose patent protection has
expired in Approved Drug Products With
Terapeutic Equivalence Evaluations,
commonly known as the Orange Book (3).
It identies drug products approved by the
FDA or saety and eectiveness that are
considered pharmaceutical equivalents
when administered to patients under con-
ditions specied in the drugs labeling. Wereview similarities and dierences between
the FDAs approval processes or generic
and brand-name drugs.
Similarities between generic and brand-
name drugs
Generic drugs are essentially the same as
brand-name drugs, with regard to intended
indication/use, active ingredients, dosage
orm and strength, route o administra-
tion, saety, quality, perormance, purity,
and stability. Te FDA classies generic
drugs as therapeutically equivalent to
brand-name drugs when the products
have been determined to be sae and eec-
tive or a specic indication and are con-
sidered to be pharmaceutically equivalent,i.e., they contain identical amounts o the
same active drug ingredient, in the same
dosage orm and route o administration,
and meet US Pharmacopeia (USP) com-
pendia standards. Te generic drug must
be bioequivalent to the brand-name drug,
be adequately labeled or proper use, and
be manuactured in compliance with cur-
rent good manuacturing practice (GMP)
regulations. Te FDA considers drugs
therapeutically equivalent even though
they may dier in characteristics such astablet shape, scoring, packaging, excipi-
ents (e.g., colors, avors, and preserva-
tives), and expiration dating or storage
conditions. Although such dierences
may be important in the care o a particu-
lar patient, and it may be appropriate or
the prescribing physician to require that a
particular brand be dispensed as a medical
necessity, the FDA believes that products
classied as therapeutically equivalent can
be substituted with the expectation that
the substituted product will produce the
same clinical eect and saety prole as the
prescribed product.
In general, the FDA approval applica-
tions or both generic and new brand-name
drugs are required to provide detailed
inormation on the products chemistry,
manuacturing steps, and quality con-
trol measures, as well as compliance with
ederal regulations or current GMP (4).
Manuacturers o both generic and brand-
name drugs are required to demonstrate
evidence o the drugs stability, as indi-
cated on the product label, and maintain
ongoing monitoring o the drugs shel lie.
Detailed chemistry, manuacturing, andcontrol (CMC) inormation is required or
both the drug substance (active ingredi-
ent), e.g., omeprazole, and the drug prod-
uct (nal drug orm administered to the
patient), e.g., Prilosec, which includes all o
the inactive components used in the nal
drug product. Drug manuacturers are also
required to evaluate whether the drugs or
the manuacturing process, including any
waste discharge, will have any environmen-
tal impact, and to have a plan to mitigate
it. Likewise, the raw materials and nishedproducts o both generic and brand-name
drugs are required to meet USP compen-
dia specications o strength and quality
(5). Te USP is a nongovernmental, ocial
public standards-setting authority or pre-
scription and over-the-counter medicines
manuactured or sold in the United States.
Te Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act o 1938
requires that all prescription and over-the-
counter medicines sold in the United States
comply with quality standards published in
the USP National Formulary. Ultimately,
these FDA requirements result in drug
product labels or both generic and brand-
name drugs that are indistinguishable.
Differences between generic and brand-
name drugs
A brand-name drug is supplied by one
company and sold under a trademarked
name, e.g., Prilosec. Generic drugs may
be supplied by more than one com-
pany and sold under the name(s) o the
active ingredient(s), e.g., omeprazole. An
The FDAs Generic-Drug Approval Process:
Similarities to and Differences FromBrand-Name Drugs
Costas H. Kealas, MD, FACG, FASGE, AGAF1,2, Arthur A. Ciociola, PhD3 and the FDA-Related Matters Committee o the American Collegeo Gastroenterology4
Am J Gastroenterol2011;106:10181021; doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.29
1Department o Internal Medicine, Northeast
Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio,
USA; 2Akron Digestive Disease Consultants
Inc., Akron, Ohio, USA; 3Global Vice President
Pharmaceutical Regulatory Strategy, Process and
Policy, Bausch+Lomb, Madison, New Jersey, USA;4Committee members who provided peer review are
listed in the Acknowledgments. Correspondence:
Costas H. Kealas, MD, FACG, FASGE, AGAF, Akron
Digestive Disease Consultants Inc., 570 White Pond
Drive, Suite 100, Akron, Ohio 44320, USA. E-mail:
8/6/2019 Generic and Brand
2/4
2011 by th Arica Cg f Gastrtrgy T Ama Jual fGastroenteroloGy
The red secTion 10
are necessary to demonstrate the sae and
eective use o the drug in the planned
patient population. In general, these clini-
cal studies include clinical saety, pharma-
cokinetic, and bioavailability studies in
healthy human volunteers (phase I stud-
ies); proo-o-concept studies showing
the drug may be eective in treating the
specic disease (phase IIa studies); dose-
ranging studies to dene the lowest eec-
tive dose (phase IIb studies); and large,
well-controlled studies evaluating drug
saety and ecacy (phase III studies).
Te number o clinical studies needed or
approval varies by therapeutic indication
and availability o other adequate treat-
ments or the disease (6).
FDA approval o generic drugs requiresthe applicant drug company to supply the
proposed drug label, CMC inormation
(6), and bioavailability and bioequivalence
data or the generic drug. A side-by-side
label comparison o the generic and brand-
name drugs is required in the application,
with any dierences in labels annotated
and justied.
Te Drug Price Competition and Pat-
ent erm Restoration Act o 1984 provides
the FDA with legal authority to approve
generic drugs using adequate bioavailabil-ity and bioequivalence data (7). Te Code
o Federal Regulations denes bioavail-
ability and bioequivalence requirements
or generic-drug market approval (8).
In an eort to urther interpret both this
Code and the 1984 law, the FDA issued a
document in 2003 entitled Bioavailabil-
ity and Bioequivalence Studies or Orally
Administered Drug ProductsGeneral
Considerations (9). Tis document pro-
vides guidance or the requirements and
process that a drug company must ollow
when applying or generic-drug market
approval. Te 1984 law, the Code o Fed-
eral Regulations, and the 2003 FDA guid-
ance document all require that or a generic
drug to be approved or sale to the public,
the drug company must provide bioavail-
ability data, and the FDA must conclude
the drug is bioequivalent to a brand-name
drug (79).
Bioavailability studies are conducted in
a small number o normal adult volun-
teers to evaluate the perormance o the
absorption, when studied under condi-
tions similar to those used with the re-
erence brand-name drug. Tis is usually
demonstrated in small clinical studies
with normal human volunteers. Bioequiv-
alence is determined by a variety o means,
including pharmacokinetic studies, phar-
macodynamic studies, comparative clini-
cal trials, and/or in vitro studies.
A manuacturer applying or FDA
approval o a brand-name drug must con-
duct a series o animal and in vitro studies
evaluating the pharmacology and toxicol-
ogy o the drug beore opening an investi-
gational new-drug application to conduct
human clinical studies. Subsequently,
adequate, well-controlled clinical studies
application or a brand-name drug must
include evidence showing the drug can be
saely used and is eective in the proposed
patient population. Such evidence may
require testing in hundreds o animals
and the treatment o tens o thousands
o patients beore a brand-name drug
can be approved by the FDA. A generic-
drug application, however, does not have
to demonstrate any preclinical or clini-
cal saety or ecacy data in the intended
patient population but need only demon-
strate bioavailability and bioequivalence
to the brand-name drug. o be consid-
ered bioequivalent to a brand-name drug,
the generic drug must show similar bio-
availability, dened as rate and extent o
Table 1. Commonly prescribed FDA-approved generic gastrointestinal drugs
Generic name Brand name
Atropine Atropen
Atropine/diphenoxylate Lomotil
Azathioprine Imuran
Balsalazide Colazal
Calcium acetate PhosLo
Cholestyramine Questran
Cimetidine Tagamet
Cyclosporine Sandimmune
Dicyclomine Bentyl
Dronabinol Marinol
Famotidine Pepcid
Glycopyrrolate Robinul
Granisetron Kytril
Hyoscyamine Levsin
Hyoscyamine extended-release Levbid, Levsinex
Lactulose Constulose
Lansoprazole Prevacid
Loperamide Imodium
Meclizine Antivert
Mesalamine enema Rowasa
Methylprednisolone Medrol
Metoclopramide Reglan
Misoprostol Cytotec
Nizatidine Axid
Octreotide Sandostatin
Omeprazole delayed-release Prilosec
Ondansetron Zoran
Pantoprazole delayed-release Protonix
Polyethylene glycol 3350 NuLytely
Prochlorperazine CompazinePromethazine Phenergan
Ranitidine Zantac
Sucralate Caraate
Sulasalazine Azulfdine
Ursodiol Actigall
8/6/2019 Generic and Brand
3/4
8/6/2019 Generic and Brand
4/4
2011 by th Arica Cg f Gastrtrgy T Ama Jual fGastroenteroloGy
The red secTion 10
accessdata.da.gov/scripts/cdrh/cdocs/cCFR/CFRSearch.cm?r=320.24> (1 April 2010).
9. US Food and Drug Administration. Centeror Drug Evaluation and Research, Divisiono Drug Inormation. Guidance or Industry:Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies or
Orally Administered Drug ProductsGeneralConsiderations. BP, Revision 1 (March2003).
10. US Food and Drug Administration. SummaryMinutes o the Advisory Committee or Phar-maceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology,Silver Spring, MD, 13 April 2010 (summary minutesapproved 28 April 2010).
REFERENCES1. Code o Federal Regulations itle 21, Vol 5,
Chapter 1, Subchapter D, Part 314: Applica-tions or FDA Approval to Market a New Drug