40
Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of

Brownian Motion

Mahmoud A. MelehyUniversity of Connecticut

Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Page 2: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Albert Einstein(1879-1955)

Nobel Prize 1921

Page 3: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Thermal MomentumSignificance of Einstein’s

Postulate

• Type: translational, vibrational, and/or rotational

• H2, at 300 K, vrms = 1.93 km/s = 6,960 km/hour

• Conduction electrons in Cu, vrms = 1,570 km/s = 5.65x106 km/hour.

Page 4: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

The Principle of Detailed Balancing

Liquid in equilibrium with its vapor. For Hg, at 0o C, nl /nv 6.3x109.

Page 5: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

The Gibbs Equation and Physicaldefinition of Chemical Potential

Page 6: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

The Gibbs Equation

(5) µdNpdVTdSdU

)6( µNPVTSU

(7) 1

dPn

dsdµ

,N

Ss (8)

V

Nn

The Gibbs-Duhem Equation

Page 7: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

The Gibbs Equation

(5a) µdNpdVTdSdU

)5( bµNPVTSU

(7) 1

dPn

dsdµ

,N

Ss (8)

V

Nn

The Gibbs-Duhem Equation

(6) 1

µ

n

Pu

Ts

Page 8: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Thermodynamic Generalization of The Maxwell-Einstein Diffusion Force

Page 9: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

The Principle of Detailed Balancing

Liquid and its vapor at equilibrium.

Page 10: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157
Page 11: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Analogy with Electric Circuits

---

-−+

+

V or L

Page 12: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Theory & Experiment for Ge & Si Diodes

Measurements by Sah (1962)

Page 13: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

In Sb and Ga As Diodes

Measurements by Stocker (1961) Measurements by Rediker & Quist (1963)

Page 14: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Solar Cell Theory & Experiment

Page 15: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

New Consequences ofthe First & Second Laws

Page 16: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Interfacial Forces, Entropy Change

Page 17: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Interfacial Electrification

Page 18: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Water Film on Glass

M. A. Melehy, Phys. Essays, vol.11, No. 3, pp. 430-443, 1998.

Page 19: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Water Film on Corian

M. A. Melehy, Phys. Essays, vol.11, No. 3, pp. 430-443, 1998.

Page 20: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Surface Charge on Corian

M.A. Melehy, Proc. 8th Int. Symp. on Particles on Surfaces, Brill Academic Publishers, Ed. K.L. Mittal, pp. 231-244, 2003.

Page 21: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Surface Charge on Styrofoam

Page 22: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Surface Charge on Mahogany Wood

Page 23: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Dipole-Charge Effects on Water-Glass Interfaces

J. Walker, Sci. Am., 251, (4), 144-154 (1984).

Page 24: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Dipole-Charge Effects on Water-Glass Interfaces

J. Walker, Sci. Am., 251, (4), 144-154 (1984).

Page 25: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Colored water flowing out of a teapot.

Page 26: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Forces Shaping Tornadoes

Page 27: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Tornadoes and Lightning

Page 28: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157
Page 29: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Dew Accumulation on Grass

M.A. Melehy, Proc. of the Eighth Int. Sym. on Particles on Surfaces, Ed. K.L. Mittal, pp. 231-244,VSP (2003), Utrecht, Boston.

Page 30: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Phenomenon of Rising Mist

Canadian Niagra Falls

Page 31: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Phenomenon of Rising Mist

Canadian Niagra Falls

Page 32: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Example of Conduction Electrons in Metals and Semiconductors

• Consistency of Einstein’ Theory of Brownian Motion with:

• 1. The first and second laws of

thermodynamics.

• 2. The quantum theory.

Page 33: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Thermal Momentum and Entropy Uniqueness

(1) 1

dPn

dsdµ

),( Tµnn (2) ),( TµPP

(3) ),(1

TTµdPn

dµT

(4) '),'(),(

µ

T dµTµnTµP

For any one constituent, the Gibbs-Duhem equation:

Quantum mechanics allows to writing:

Therefore, (1)

Page 34: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Let the arbitrary value 0 = - . Then

P( ,T) 0, for any value of T (5)and (4)

P(,T )

[n(,T )]T d (6)

d s dT1n

dP (1)Solving (1) for s, we get

s 1n

P(,T )T (7)

For the general case of conduction electrons in solids,quantum mechanics has led to

Let the arbitrary value 0 = - . Then

P( ,T) 0, for any value of T (5)and (4)

P(,T )

[n(,T )]T d (6)

d s dT1n

dP (1)Solving (1) for s, we get

s 1n

P(,T )T (7)

For the general case of conduction electrons in solids,quantum mechanics has led to

P( ,T) 0, for any value of T (5)and (4)

P(,T )

[n(,T )]T d (6)

d s dT1n

dP (1)Solving (1) for s, we get

s 1n

P(,T )T (7)

µ

0),( TµP

n

1

T

Ps

1

dPn

dsdµ

µ

T dµTµnTµP '),'(),(

Page 35: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

For conduction electrons in solids, generally:

n

0g( ) F(,,T)

,Td (8)

Here, is the electron energy, g() is the volume-

energy density of quantum states, and F is the Fermi-

Dirac function:

F( , ,T ) 1

1 e ( )/kT(9)

Equations (6),(8), and (9)

P( ,T )

0g( ) F( ,,T)

,T d,T

d(10)

For conduction electrons in solids, generally:

n

0g( ) F(,,T)

,Td (8)

Here, is the electron energy, g() is the volume-

energy density of quantum states, and F is the Fermi-

Dirac function:

F( , ,T ) 1

1 e ( )/kT(9)

Equations (6),(8), and (9)

P( ,T )

0g( ) F( ,,T)

,T d,T

d(10)

n

0g( ) F(,,T)

,Td (8)

F( , ,T ) 1

1 e ( )/kT(9)

P( ,T )

0g( ) F( ,,T)

,T d,T

d(10)

0

, dTFgn T

is is g

F

kTµeTµF

/1

1,,

µ

T dµdTµFgTµP ' ,',,

Page 36: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Carrying out a few mathematical steps, includingintegration by parts of (10), we obtain

P( ,T )

0

0

g()dF(, ,T) ,T

d (11)

s 1n

P(,T )T (7)

Substituting (11) into (7), we get

s =1T

u Pn

(12)provided that

u = the kinetic energy per particle (13)

Carrying out a few mathematical steps, includingintegration by parts of (10), we obtain

P( ,T )

0

0

g()dF(, ,T) ,T

d (11)

s 1n

P(,T )T (7)

Substituting (11) into (7), we get

s =1T

u Pn

(12)provided that

u = the kinetic energy per particle (13)

P( ,T )

0

0

g()dF(, ,T) ,T

d (11)

s 1n

P(,T )T (7)

s =1T

u Pn

(12)provided that

µ

T dµdTµFgTµP ' ,',,

n

1

T

Ps

µ

n

Pus

T

1

Page 37: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Generally, for conduction electrons in metals andsemiconductors, the energy band is considered to beparabolic; i.e.

g = C (13)(11) and (13)

P 23

C

03/2 F( , ,T) ,T

d b n u (14)

which is the internal pressure that represents the time-rateof change of momentum, associated with the thermalmotion of the particles. This is another confirmation of thevalidity of Einstein’s basic postulate underlying theBrownian motion theory.

Generally, for conduction electrons in metals andsemiconductors, the energy band is considered to beparabolic; i.e.

g = C (13)(11) and (13)

P 23

C

03/2 F( , ,T) ,T

d b n u (14)

which is the internal pressure that represents the time-rateof change of momentum, associated with the thermalmotion of the particles. This is another confirmation of thevalidity of Einstein’s basic postulate underlying theBrownian motion theory.

parabolic; i.e.g = C (13)

(11) and (13)

P 23

C

03/2 F( , ,T) ,T

d b n u (14)

Cg

0

,2/3 ,,

3

2 dTµFCP Tµ

Page 38: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

Summary and Conclusion

• Generalizing thermodynamically Einstein’s theory of Brownian motion has led to an interfacial transport theory, which, in turn led to many consequences, including:

• Revealing that the first and second laws of thermodynamics require the existence of electric charges on most surfaces, membranes and other interfaces.

• This nearly universal property of inter-faces makes it possible to readily explain

Page 39: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

• many diverse phenomena, such as: ‘surface’ tension, capillarity, particle adhesion, the separation of charges upon phase change, atmospheric electricity, fog and cloud suspension, and even one mysterious phenomenon that has been observed since ancient times: the generation of static electricity by rubbing two different, insulating surfaces against one another. How much had this particular phenomenon been explained before is described, in the May, 1986 issue of Physics Today, by D. M. Burland, and L. B. Schein, who

Page 40: Generalization of Einstein’s Theory of Brownian Motion Mahmoud A. Melehy University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1157

have stated: "That some materials can acquire an electric charge by contact or rubbing has been known at least since the time of Thales of Miletus, around 600 B.C., and much work has been done on understanding the phenomenology of the effect, particularly in the 18th, and 19th centuries; nevertheless the underlying physics of electrostatic charging of insulators remains unclear.“

Generalizing Einstein’s theory of Brownian motion to interfacial systems has unlocked this ancient mystery, and many other ones too.

Thank you.