22
Langmuir’s Paradox: Can Ion instability at sheath-edge thermalize the ions too? Chi-Shung Yip Noah Hershkowitz University of Wisconsin – Madison Greg Severn University of San Diego 1 GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

  • Upload
    rashad

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Langmuir’s Paradox: Can Ion instability at sheath-edge thermalize the ions too? Chi-Shung Yip Noah Hershkowitz
 University of Wisconsin – Madison Greg Severn University of San Diego. GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011. Pre-sheath and charge exchange explained. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

Langmuir’s Paradox: Can Ion instability at sheath-edge thermalize the ions too?

Chi-Shung YipNoah Hershkowitz

University of Wisconsin – Madison

Greg Severn

University of San Diego

1

GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

Page 2: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

• Ions travel through a potential drop into the sheath boundary to accelerate to Bohm’s velocity.

• The potential drop affects only charge particles

• Neutral atoms are not charged• If charge exchange occurs, ions

will be born from a zero drift velocity Maxwellian of the neutral gas.

2

Pre-sheath and charge exchange explained

Pre-sheath

Page 3: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

Langmuir’s Paradox• As old as plasma physics itself!• Originally found by Langmuir.• Energetic electrons on the tail of the Maxwellian

distribution of a plasma are not confined by the plasma potential.

• Notice that in his experiment, ionization mostly comes from electrons on the tail of the Maxwellian, so his plasma should not have existed.

• However Langmuir found that electrons are Maxwellian up to 50eV (with his Langmuir probe), so there must be an additional mechanism in electron thermalization.

3

Page 4: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

4

Page 5: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

5

Most electrons on this side should be lost

Page 6: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

But what is this mechanism?• In Langmuir’s experiment, the electron-electron

scattering collision length is far greater than the tube diameter, so electron-electron scattering without additional assumptions does not explain the phenomena.

• Various explanations have been proposed: sheath scattering, photons scattering, sheath oscillations, etc.

• None of them gives a satisfactory answer to the paradox.

6

Page 7: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

The Baalrud theory• Baalrud et al. resolved the Langmuir’s Paradox in the

following way[1]: • Ion Acoustic Instability in the presheath, increases the

electron-electron and ion-ion collisional cross section of an otherwise stable plasma by 100 times

• This quickly thermalizes electrons near the sheath-edge. replenishing high energy electrons lost due to insufficient sheath potential.

• MHz instabilities near sheaths has been observed by previous researchers. [2]

7

[1] S. D. Baalrud and C. C. Hegna, “Kinetic Theory of the Presheath and the Bohm Criterion,” Plasma Sources Science and Technology[2] D. Gabor, E. A. Ash, and D. Dracott, Nature 176, 916 (1955).

Page 8: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

8Claire N, Bachet G, Stroth U and Doveil F 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 062103

A “two stage” ion velocity distribution phenomenon is found in previous experiments

• Claire et al. measured ion velocity distribution functions (ivdfs) throughout the pre-sheath.

• Plasma created in a 80 cm long x 40 cm diam. filament discharge device.

• Neutral pressure 1.8 x 10-4 mbar (0.135 mTorr)

• Te = 2.5eV, ne ~ 6x109cm3

• Non-Maxwellian tails of ivdfs are seen as ions enters pre-sheath, and thermalizes as they goes into sheath edge

Page 9: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

Severn et al., 2003

9G. D. Severn, X. Wang, E. Ko, and N. Hershkowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 145001 (2003).

Page 10: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

This is also resolved by the Baalrud theory

• The Baalrud theory explains the “two stage pre-sheath with the following:

• Ions entering the beginning of the presheath will first become non-Maxwellian due to charge exchange

• As ions travel towards the sheath edge, they will thermalize into a Maxwellian distribution due to ion acoustic instability enhanced friction.

10

Page 11: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

Experimental Approach• Pre-sheath lengths are proportional to the ion neutral

collision length which is inversely proportional to neutral pressure

• According to Baalrud et al. ion acoustic instability will not have adequate distance to grow as pre-sheath shortens.

• Experiments were set up to measure ivdfs throughout presheaths to verify previous findings.

• Control experiments at higher pressures were setup to find the existence of a threshold pressure where this phenomena cease occuring.

11

Page 12: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

Experimental Setup• Plasma is produced in a multi-dipole device by energetic electrons emitted from

heated filaments.

• Electron temperature is measured with a Langmuir probe.

• Laser Induced Fluorescence determines ion flow velocities and ion temperatures. Xe+ LIF is employed

• An emissive probe measures the plasma potential profile near a negatively biased plate [3]

• The sheath/presheath boundary is identified from the slope change of the emission current vs bias voltage curve

12[3] Wang X, Hershkowitz N. Simple way to determine thee edge of an electro-free sheath with an emissive probe, REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS  77, 4, 043507. 2006

Page 13: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

Multi-dipole device

Pump

ProbeCircuitEmissive Probe

Langmuir Probe

Electrode Plate

-60 V, 1.0A

Hot Filament

-30 V

PMT

Z

LIF

Laser

Magnets

ee

e

70 cm

60 cm

Beam Dump

13

Page 14: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

Experimental setup of the laser systemExperimental setup of the laser system

OpticalChopper

WavelengthMeter

ChopperController

I2 Cell

PowerMeter

Mirror

Mirror

Periscope

HeatingRibbon

Laser Head

Laser Driver

I2 CellHeater

To Chamber

14

Page 15: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

Multi-dipole Device

Ar LIF

Laser

PMT

EP

- Argon + Xenon - Gas pressure: 0.1 ~ 1.0 mTorr- Filament bias: -60 V- Emission current: 1.0 ~ 1.25 A- Electron density: ~ 109 cm-3

- Electron temperature: ~ 1 eV- Using the filament of the emissive probe as an aiming point of the laser.

15

Page 16: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

How does the LIF work?How does the LIF work?

Optical excitation of Xe metastable ion in state 5d4F7/2 to 6p4D5/2 with the laser of 680.574 nm

Relaxation from the state 6p4D5/2 to 6s4P3/2. Observe the fluorescence at 492.15 nm

It is assumed that the metastable ions are in thermal equilibrium with ground state ions 16

Page 17: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

The sheath edge is determined from the change in slope of The sheath edge is determined from the change in slope of inflection point vs Vinflection point vs Vpp

2

0 2 ( )i ed e n ndx

Plasma parameters- Ar 0.7 mTorr- Filament: -60 V, 1.00 A- Electrode: -30 V

Where is the sheath edge?- Emitted electrons from the probe reduces the curvature of potential.- The reduction in the curvature of the potential increases as the emission increases.- The inflection point becomes more positive with the increased emission in a sheath.- An electron-free sheath is identified as the position where the inflection point changes from increasing with emission to decreasing with emission.- From the figure, the sheath edge is determined to be 0.35 ~ 0.40 cm

17For more information about emissive probe techniques, please attend JP Sheehan’s presentation on Wednesday-Abstract: LW3.00001 : “A Comparison of Emissive Probe Techniques for Electric Potential Measurements in a Complex Plasma” 2:00 PM–2:15 PM

Page 18: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

Maxwell’s Demon is used to control plasma temperature

18

0.025mm Tungsten wires nicely lined up

Page 19: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

At higher pressure charge exchange tail persists

19

Page 20: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

At low pressure, Claire et al.’s phenomenon are replicated

20

Page 21: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

Summary• Preliminary data recreated phenomenon by Claire et

al. • A higher pressure case where ion acoustic instability

no longer thermalize non-Maxwellian tails of ivdfs, seems to be found. This is consistent with Baalrud’s predictions.

• Further LIF experiments will be performed at additional pressures to obtain complete spectrum of change in the phenomena.

21

Page 22: GEC, Salt Lake City, UT, November 14, 2011

22

This work was supported by U.S. Department of Energy Grants No. DE-FG02-97ER54437 and No. DE FG02- 03ER54728, National Science Foundation Grants No. CBET-0903832, and No. CBET-0903783