27
Ge/Ay133 hat have radial velocity surveys told us about (exo)-planetary science?

Ge/Ay133

  • Upload
    jalen

  • View
    28

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

What have radial velocity surveys told us about (exo)-planetary science?. Ge/Ay133. Mayor, M. & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355. Udry, S. et al. 2002, A&A, 390, 26. Jovian planets througout the 0.05-5 AU region. And…. No strong preference for orbital distances…. …except for a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Ge/Ay133

Ge/Ay133

What have radial velocity surveys told us about (exo)-planetary science?

Page 2: Ge/Ay133

Mayor, M. & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355

Page 3: Ge/Ay133

Udry, S. et al. 2002, A&A, 390, 26

Page 4: Ge/Ay133

Jovian planetsthrougout the0.05-5 AU region.

And…

Page 5: Ge/Ay133

No strong preference for orbital distances…

…except for a“pile up” of hotJupiters at P~3 days.

Page 6: Ge/Ay133

Planetary characteristics? Some trend in M versus R (bias?), butbeyond 0.05-0.1 AU, little preference for low eccentricities:

Butler, R.P. et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 505

Page 7: Ge/Ay133

Even with incompleteness, strong preference for ~Jovian mass:

Butler, R.P. et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 505

Page 8: Ge/Ay133

Stars are different, turnover at low mass!

“The brown dwarf desert”?

Does this tell usthat stars and planets formdifferently?

Orion IMF

Page 9: Ge/Ay133

Is there an eccentricity preference w/mass? Not really…

Marcy, G. et al. 2005, astro-ph/0505003

Page 10: Ge/Ay133

Is there an eccentricity preference w/mass? Not really, part II…

Butler, R.P. et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 505

?

Page 11: Ge/Ay133

Another clue as to formation: Planet formation efficiency correlates strongly with metallicity!

Fischer, D.A. & Valenti, J. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1102

Page 12: Ge/Ay133

What about planetary multiplicity? Complex doppler patterns:

Page 13: Ge/Ay133

Summary of known multiple planetary systems:

Marcy, G. et al. 2005, astro-ph/0505003

Page 14: Ge/Ay133

A super earth & GJ 876? Rivera, E.J. et al. 2005, (see class web site)

Page 15: Ge/Ay133

GJ 876 orbitsevolve with time (expected w/mutual perturbations)!

What about other systems?

Rivera, E.J. et al. 2005, (see class web site)

Page 16: Ge/Ay133

HD 168443a: 7.2 Mj 58 daysb: 17 Mj 1739 days

=1/29.98 ?!30:1?

Page 17: Ge/Ay133

HD 12661a: 2.3 Mj 263 daysa: 1.6 Mj 1444 days

=1/5.511:2?

Page 18: Ge/Ay133

47 U Maa: 2.5 Mj 1089 daysb: 0.76 Mj 2594 days

=1/2.4

Page 19: Ge/Ay133

Gleise 876a: 1.89 Mj 61 daysb: 0.56 Mj 30 days

Page 20: Ge/Ay133

HD 37124a: 0.75 Mj 152 db: 1.2 Mj 1495 d

Page 21: Ge/Ay133

ups AndA: 0.69 Mj 4.6 dB: 1.9 Mj 241.5 dC: 3.75 Mj 1284 d

Page 22: Ge/Ay133

HD 82943A: 1.63 Mj 444 dB: 0.88 222 d

Page 23: Ge/Ay133

55 CncA: .84 Mj 14.6 dB: 0.21 Mj 44.3 dC: 4 Mj 5360 d

3:1!

Page 24: Ge/Ay133

What we know:- ~1% of solar-type stars have Hot Jupiters

-~7% of solar-type stars have >Mj planets in the “terrestrial planet” region. Extrapolation of currentincompeteness suggests ~12% w/planets @ <20 AU.- multiple planetary systems are ~common

- planetary resonances are ~common

What can explain these properties?

Page 25: Ge/Ay133

Disk-star- and protoplanet interactions lead to migration while the gas is present. Core- accretion?

Theory

1 AU at 140 pc subtends 0.’’007.

Jupiter (5 AU):V_doppler = 13 m/sV_orbit = 13 km/sSimulation G. Bryden, JPL

Thus, need to study objects in this phase…

Page 26: Ge/Ay133

Core-accretion models can now be compared to observations:

Planetsversusmetallicity:

Data

Observedin opencircles.

Ida, S. & Lin, D. 2004, ApJ, 616, 567

Page 27: Ge/Ay133

Early disk models held that eccentricities were DAMPED. Not so fast…

Goldreich & Sari 2005

Need aninitiale~0.01.

Goldreich, P. & Sari, R. 2003, ApJ, 585, 1024