Upload
mohamm3d
View
173
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
June 2003 Grade Boundaries
Citation preview
GCSE Mathematics 1387
GCSE Mathematics 1387
Summer 2003GCSE Mathematics
A*ABCDEFG
Paper 5501
62463116
Paper 5502
57412611
Paper 5503
62453015
Paper 5504
5838238
Paper 550573553720
Paper 550660453015
Paper 55074337312622181410
Marks for papers 5501 5506 are each out of 100; marks for coursework (5507) are out of 48.
GCSE Modular Mathematics 1388
Summer 20031388
A*ABCDEFG
Foundation Stage 3/1Paper 5514
3526178
Foundation Stage 3/2Paper 5515
3526178
Intermediate Stage 3/1Paper 5516
3425167
Intermediate Stage 3/2Paper 5517
3425155
Higher Stage 3/1Paper 55183526179
Higher Stage 3/2Paper 55193727178
CourseworkPaper 55074337312622181410
(Marks for papers 5514 5519 are each out of 62; marks for coursework (5507) are out of 48)
GCSE Modular Mathematics 1388
March 2003
1388
A*ABCDEFG
Foundation Stage 1Paper 5508
2417103
Intermediate Stage 1Paper 5509
2721135
Higher Stage 1Paper 55103124169
Foundation Stage 2Paper 5511
2619137
Intermediate Stage 2Paper 5512
2922134
Higher Stage 2Paper 55133022147
(Marks for papers 5508 5513 are each out of 38)
GCSE Modular Mathematics 1388
January 2003
1388
A*ABCDEFG
Foundation Stage 1Paper 5508
2720136
Intermediate Stage 1Paper 5509
2922146
Higher Stage 1Paper 551033261811
Foundation Stage 2Paper 5511
2720136
Intermediate Stage 2Paper 5512
2921123
Higher Stage 2Paper 551333251710
(Marks for papers 5508 5513 are each out of 38)
GCSE Modular Mathematics 1388
March 2002
1388
A*ABCDEFG
Foundation Stage 1Paper 5508
2821147
Intermediate Stage 1Paper 5509
2922146
Higher Stage 1Paper 551031241710
(Marks for papers 5508 5510 are each out of 38)
GCSE Modular Mathematics 1388
January 2002
1388
A*ABCDEFG
Foundation Stage 1Paper 5508
2821159
Intermediate Stage 1Paper 5509
2821135
Higher Stage 1Paper 551030231610
(Marks for papers 5508 5510 are each out of 38)
The grade boundaries suggested by the awarding committee for GCSE Mathematics were:
UnitA*ABCDEFG
5501/01----62463116
5502/02----57412611
5503/03--62453015--
5504/04--5838238--
5505/0573553720----
5506/0660453015----
5514/14----3526178
5515/15----3526178
5516/16--3425167--
5517/17--3425155--
5518/183526179----
5519/193727178----
These values could not be converted directly to uniform marks since they gave very dramatic changes in the rates of conversion from raw mark to uniform mark just above and just below the highest and lowest grade boundaries within the tier. The adjusted raw marks which were used to determine uniform marks are shown below. These adjusted raw marks more closely resemble the percentages of marks required for the award of notional grades on the uniform mark scale. These are the boundaries that appear on the component mark listings.
UnitA*ABCDEFG
5501/01----84675033
5502/02----84675033
5503/03--88756351--
5504/04--88756351--
5505/0590807060----
5506/0690807060----
5514/14----52413121
5515/15----52413121
5516/16--55473931--
5517/17--55473931--
5518/1856504337----
5519/1956504337----
The reason for making these statistical adjustments is given overleaf.
1387Mathematics A
1388Mathematics B
This is the first year in which the above specifications have been awarded using a uniform mark scale system. On the uniform mark scale, A* is given 90% of the available uniform mark, A 80%, B 70%, C 60%, D 50%, E 40%, F 30% and G 20%.
Normally, the raw component mark boundaries are translated directly on to the uniform mark scale. However, because these specifications are tiered, there are complications because of the limited range of grades that is available for the tier.
When the actual raw mark boundaries were translated on to the uniform mark scale, there were sudden, sharp changes in the rate of exchange of raw mark to uniform mark above and below the boundary mark for the highest and the lowest targeted grade. This meant that candidates were not receiving sufficient credit for achievement above the minimum required for the award of the highest targeted grade. Also, candidates were being severely penalised for failing to achieve the minimum required mark for the award of the lowest targeted grade.
To counteract these effects, it was decided to adjust the raw marks to give a more equitable rate of exchange from raw mark to uniform mark across the whole mark range. In other words, the raw marks were adjusted to fall more closely in line with the percentages of the uniform mark range required for the award of the grade.
This simple statistical procedure has resulted in a more acceptable rate of exchange across the whole of the mark range. There are no sudden and severe changes in the rate of exchange.
The rank order of candidates has not been interfered with. The vast majority of candidates will notice no difference in the grade they have achieved. However, those few candidates just above the maximum grade threshold or just below the minimum grade threshold are now being treated fairly.
A worked example is shown.
1387 Mathematics B Component 5506/06
This is the higher tier Paper 6. Total raw mark for the paper is 100
Raw mark grade boundaries:
GradeMaxA*ABC
Raw Mark10060453015
Adjusted Raw Mark10090807060
Uniform Mark240216192168144
This shows that the maximum raw mark of 100 translates to a uniform mark of 240.
Raw MarkUniform MarkAdjusted Raw Mark
100240100
6021690
4519280
Between a raw mark of 60 (grade A*) and 100 (maximum), two raw marks are needed to gain approximately one uniform mark.
Between a raw mark of 45 (grade A) and 60 (grade A*), one raw mark is needed to gain approximately one and a half uniform marks.
A similar abrupt change in the conversion occurs below grade C. It is these sudden changes in the rate of exchange that have been removed by the statistical adjustment of the raw mark.
If the adjusted raw mark is used, 10 adjusted raw marks always equate to 24 uniform marks.
Dr Jim Sinclair
General Manager, Standards & Awards