Upload
doanthien
View
216
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CANOPY AND LEAF GAS EXCHANGE ACCOMPANYING PYTHIUM
ROOT ROT OF LETTUCE AND CHRYSANTHEMUM
A Thesis
Presented to
The Faculty of Graduate Studies
of
The University of Guelph
In partial ful filment of requirements
for the degree of
Master of Science
January, 200 1
Q Melanie Beth Johnstone, 200 1
National Library 191 of Canada Bibliothèque nationale du Canada
Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services seivices bibliographiques
395 Wellington Street 395, me Wellington Ottawa ON K I A ON4 Ottawa ON K 1 A O N 4 Canada Canada
The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence dowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seil reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in rnicroform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de
reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique.
The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substanhal extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othenvise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation.
ABSTRACT
CAKOPY AND LEAF GAS EXCHANGE ACCOMPANYING PYTHIUMROOT ROT OF LETTUCE AND CHRYSANTHEMUM
Melanie Beth Johnstone University of Guelph, 2000
Advisors: Professor B. Grodzinski Professor J.C. Sutton
The first charactenzation of host carbon assimilation in response to Pythium infection
is described. Hydroponic lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Bella Green) inoculated with
Pjtfhitrw dissofoctm experienced 3 M O % growth inhibition, amibuteci to decreased lea f and
whole plant photosynthesis. Leaf gas exchange and transpiration was significantly reduced
as early as 7 days afler inoculation, several days in advance of visible foliar symproms. P.
aphanidermarirm was mildly pathogenic in hydroponic chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum
nzori/oliurn L. cv. Fina), exhibiting reduced whole plant photosynthesis only late in the
gowth cycle. Altentions in gas exchange may be useful in nondestructive, objective
diagnosis of plant disease, a critical step in pathogen control in recirculating nutrient
solutions. W irradiation of nutrient solutions was studied as a potential rnethod of pathogen
inactivation; however, copper and zinc toxicity even with inacfivated lamps confounded
evaluations. It is premature to recommend W as a remediation technology for recirculating
nutrient solutions in commercial greenhouses.
My sincere thanks are extended to my supervison, Drs. Bernard Grodzinski and John
Sutton, for their support and guidance throughout this study. 1 would also like to
acknowledge DE. Michael Dixon and J. Chris Hall, members of my advisory committee, and
Drs. John Proctor and M. Jim Tsujita, the Chair and extemal representative, respectively, of
the examination committee, for their involvement and critical suggestions for the
irnprovement of this manuscript.
I wish to express great appreciation to Dr. Hai Yu, Yaping Zheng, Dr. Weizhong Lu,
and Nathan Owen-Going for P ' i u m inoculum preparation in this collaborative project.
Bridging the gap between physiology and pathology would not have been possible without
their contributions. 1 would like to thank George Lin, Rodger Tschanz, Luke Lairson,
Carmrn Tse. and Emily Binnendyk for their invaluable assistance in maintenance of plant
materials and hydroponic systems.
1 am extremely grateful to Geoffiey Cloutier for statistical consultations and
programming support in S-Plus. This man knowç regression analysis like no other.
Financial assistance From the Centre for Research in Earth and Space Technologies
(CRESTech), Flowers Canada (Ont.) Ltd., CanAdapt, Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council (NSERC), Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs
(OMAFRA), Ontario Greenhouse Vegetable Producers Marketing Board, and Trojan
Technologies, Inc., in support of this project is most gratefully achowledged. 1 would also
like to thank Rob Hansen of Erieview Acres Ltd. for providing chrysanthemum cumngs.
Lastly I wish to thank my family and fiends for their emotional support and
encouragement, especially Ryan Ramsey and Jeff Riggs for keepin' it real, my sistas in
crime in the Bw.r community, and my parents, Bill and Sue Johnstone, whose lifelong
encouragement is much appreciated.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
................................................................................................ ACKYOWLEDGEMENTS i
... ................................................................................................... TABLE OF CONTENTS 111
. . ............................................................................................................. LIST OF TABLES vil
... ........................................................................... ............................ LIST OF FIGURES , v111
.................................................. LIST OF DEFINED TERMS AiD ABBREVIATIONS x
CHAPTER 1: Introduction and Literature Review
......................................................................... ................... Chapter introduction .. 1
3 P ~ t h i m infection ........................ ................................................................................
Host Responses to Root infection
............................. 1 . Cellular responses within the mot zone of host plants 5
...................................................... 2. Metabolic responses of the whoie plant 7
........................................................................ i. infection by fithium 8
................................................. ii. Infection by other mot pathogens 9
.................................................. Root Rot Epidemics in Recirculating Hydroponics 1 1
Emerging Technologies for Pathogen Control in Commercial Hydroponic
................................................................................................. Systems 1 4
CHAPTER 2: Photosynthesis and Plant Productivity of Lettuce (Lacruca sativa L.
cv. Bella Green) Following Infection by Pythium dissotocum
Chapter Introduction ............................................................................................ 18
Materials and Methods ............................................................................................. 20
Experimental Results
influence of PpLium dissotoaim on growth of lettuce ................................ 27
................................... Whole plant gas exchange and carbon accumulation 27
Influence of irradiance on whole plant NCER ............................................. 30
................................ Influence of CO2 concentration on whole plant NCER 30
.............................................................................. Leaf chlorophyll content 33
.................................................. influence of irndiance on leaf gas exchange 33
Influence of stage of host maturity on leaf gas exchange and water
reIations ................ .. ........................................................................ 36
...................... Influence of inoculum density on seventy of disease effects 39
Specific leaf area ...................................................................................... .A2
Discussion .................................................................................. 4.c
Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 56
CHAPTER 3: Photosynthesis and Plant Productivity of Chrysanthemum
(Chrysa~ttlremum morifoliurn L . cv Fina) Following Infection by Pythium
aph art idermatum
Chapter Introduction ................................................................................................ 58
Materials and Methods .................... ,.,. ..................................................................... 60
Experimental Results
Influence ofPythium aphanidenncltum on growth ofchrysanthemum ......... 64
Whole plant gas exchange and carbon accumulation ................................. 64
Influence of Pyfhium inoculation on leaf physiology of plants
. . in smgle pot culture .......................................................................... 68
Effect of Pythi~trn inoculation on NFT-groown chrysanthemum ................. 68
Root hydraulic conductance.. . . . . . . ... ... ...... ... . . . . .. . .. . .... . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. ... . . . . .68
Discussion.. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... ............ ... ..... . ... . ... . . . . ... . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. ... ... . . . . .. . .. . ..... . . . . .. . .. 72
Conclusion ....... ............................................ ............ ... ................... ................ .. ........ 76
CHAPTER 4: Use of Ultraviolet Irradiation of Recirculating Hydroponic Solution
in Trertment of Pythiurn Root Rot
Chapter Introduction ........................................................ ........ .............. ............. .. ... 78
Materials and Methods .......................... .................................................................. 80
Experirnental Results
Influence of concurrent W exposure and Pythiurn inoculation on
vegetative growth of chrysanthemum, Experirnent 1 .................... 85
Elernental analysis of non-inoculated plants grown in W-treated
nutrient solution .....,.......... .... .. ....... . ......... ........ ............................... ... 85
Influence of Pythium inoculation on physiological parameters in
plants exposed to UV-treated nutrient solution .............................. 85
Hydraulic conductance of chrysanthernums exposed to UV-treated
solution following Pyrhium inoculation .......................................... 90
Influence of exposure to inactivated UV system on yield of
chrysanthemum: Experiment 2. .................................................... -90
Elemental analysis of nutrient solution in contact with inactivated
W larnp system.. ........................................................................... .90
Influence of concurrent LN exposure and Pythiirm inoculation on
flowenng chrysanthemum, Experiment 3 ......................................... 95
Influence of exposure to b ra s or plastic fittings on chrysanthemum
growth: Experiment 4 ....................................................................... .95
Discussion ................................................................................................................... 99
Conclusion ............................................................................................................. LOS
.................................................................................................. GENERAL SUMRIARY 107
................................................................................................... LITEMTURE CITED 108
.APPELiDIX 1: Correlation of Nondestructive SPAD Measurements of Leaf
...................................... "Greenness" with Extractable Chlorophyll Content 1 24
APPENDIX 2: SAS Program for Calculation of Leaf Physiological
.......................................................................................................... Parameters 135
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1 Leaf physiological changes associated with Pythium root rot in lettuce
plants inoculated at 14, 2 1, or 28 DAP in Experirnent 1 ...................................... 38
Table 2.2 Leaf physiological changes associated with Pythilim root rot in lettuce
plants inoculated at 14 or 2 1 DAP in Expenment 2 ............................................. 40
Table 1.1 Elemental analysis of chrysanthemum leaf tissue, Experiment 1 ........................ 88
Table 4.2 Elemental analysis of chrysanthemurn root tissue, Expenment 1 .............. .......... 89
Table 4.3 influence of nutrient solution exposure to inactivated W lamp system
on growth of chrysanthemum, Experiment 2... .. .... .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .... .... . . . .. -93
Table 4.4 Nutritional analysis of nutrient solution exposed to inactivated UV lamp
systern, Experiment 2 ................................................................................................ 94
Table 4.5 Influence of Pythium aphanidennatum inoculation and one hour UV
solution irradiation on growth of chrysanthemurn, Expenment 3 .......................... 3 6
Table 4.6 Influence of nutrient solution exposure to brass or plastic fittings on growth
of chrysanthemum, Expenment 4 ................................................. ........................... 97
Table 4.7 Nutrient content of fertilizer solutions exposed to brass or plastic fittings,
Experiment 4 ....... .... ..... .. ... .. ....... .... . ....... ....... ... . .. ..... ..... . .... ...... ..... ............ ............... 98
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1 Growth of lettuce cv. Bella Green following inoculation with Pythiurn
dissotoczrm ........................................................................................................ 2 8
Figure 2.2 Diumal gas exchange and carbon accumulation in lettuce 28 d after
fythiirrn inoculation ................................................................................................. 29
Figure 2.3 Influence of irradiance on whole plant photosynthesis of
................................................................................... lettuce 28 DAI with Pythicrm 3 1
Figure 2.1 Influence of short rem variations in CO, concentration on
whole plant NCER in lemice 28 d after inoculation with Pythium ......................... 32
Figure 2.5 SPAD measurernents in lettuce following Pythium inoculation ...................... 34
Figure 2.6 Influence of irradiance on lettuce leaf physiology, 28 d post-inoculation
with Pythirrm ............................................................................................................ 35
Figure 2.7 Leaf NCER in lemice inoculated with Pythium at 14 DAP and statistical
interpretation of physiological parameten .............................................................. 37
Figure 2.8 hfluence of Pythium inoculurn density on growth and metabolism
of lettuce inocutated at 2 1 DAP ................................................................................ 4 1
Figure 2.9 Specific leaf area of lemice inoculated with Pyihiurn at different stages
..................................................................... of growth and two inoculum densities 43
Figure 3.1 Growth of chrysanthemum cv. Fina following inoculation with
........................................................................................ Pythiiini aphonidermatum -65
Figure 3.2 Whole plant gas exchange and carbon accumulation in chrysanthernum
25-28 days after inoculation with Pythium (Set 1 ) ................................................ 66
Figure 3.3 W hole plant gas exchange and carbon accumulation in chrysanthemum
29-32 days afier inoculation with Pythium (Set 2) ................................................ 67
Figure 3.4 Influence of Pythium inoculation on leaf physiology of chrysanthemurn
grown in individual pot culture, Experiment 1 .................................. ......................... 69
Figure 3.5 influence of Pyrhilm infection on Ieaf physiology of NFT
c hrysanthemum (Experiment 2) ....... ..... . ... .. . .. . ...... ......... ............. ..... . .. .. . . . ... .. . . . ..... . .. 70
Figure 3.6 Influence of Pythiim infection on hydraulic conductance of entire
c hrysanthemum mot systems ................. ....... .......................... ........... ....... ........ 7 1
Figure 1.1 Ultraviolet lamp system in line with NFT chrysanthemum ............................ 82
Figure 4.2 Biomass accumulation in chrysanthemurn cv. Fina following exposure to
UV-treated nutrient solution and Pythium inoculation, Experiment 1 ..................... 86
Figure 4.3 influence of üV solution irradiation on growth of chrysanthemum,
Experiment 1 ............................................................................................................. 87
Figure 4.4 Leaf gas exchange and water relations in chrysanthemurn following
inoculation with Pythium and exposure to W-treated solutions, Exp. 1 .... ............. 9 1
Figure 4.5 Hydraulic conductance of severed chrysanthemurn root systems,
Experiment 1 .............................................................................................................. 92
LIST OF DEFINED TERMS AM) ABBREVIATIONS
C,: intercellular CO,: concentration of CO, inside the mesophyll cells of a leaf; rneasured
in p ~ - ~ - '
DAI: days after inoculation
DAP: days after planting (transplanting to noughs)
E: transpiration, the loss of water vapour from the surface of leaves and other aboveground
pans of a plant; measured in mmol H,o*~"-s ' '
EC: electrical conductivity, reflecting the concentration of dissolved ions in a nutrient
solution; measured in pS-cm-'
Epidemiology: the study of the incidence and distribution of diseases, and of their control
and prevention
Etiology: the determination and snidy of the cause, or ongin, of a disease
GCO,: stomatal conductance for diffusion of CO,, a measure of stomatal opening; rneasured
in pmol CO,-mJ-s*'
Hydraulic Conductance: the rate of movement of water in the root system; rneasured in
,J4-'
Inoculate: to bring a pathogen into contact with a host plant or plant organ
IRGA: infra-red gas analyzer
NCER: net carbon exchange rate, an instantaneous measurement of carbon fixation in
photosynthesis; measured in pmol C~~.m".s"
NFT: nutrient film technique
PAR: photosynthetically active radiation, from 400-700 ,urnol-rn"-~-~
Pathogenesis: the rnanner of disease development within host tissues
Pathogenicity: the capability of a pathogen to cause disease
Virulence: the degree or measure of pathogenicity of a given pathogen
WUE: water use efficiency; as a ratio of NCER to E, this parameter is unitless
Zoospore: an asexual fungal spore, bearing flagella and capable of moving in water
Chapter 1: Introduction and Literature Review
Introduction
The established philosophy of hydroponics accepts that closed recirculating systems
are inherently more conducive to epidemics of root diseases than open drain systems
(Schuerger 1992). While the divenity of infectious root diseases seen in hydroponic crops
appears to be less than field-grown crops, disease severity is often intensified due to the
favourable environmental conditions and the dense monoculture of susceptible plants
(Zinncn 1988; Stanghellini 1988). Hydroponic systems genenlly lack the microbial diversity
and biological "buffering" found in soil, where many soilbome pathogens are limited by
antagonism and competition fiom other microorganisms (Paulitz 1997). A shifi in root-
infecting pathogens is observed in hydroponics, to species better adapted to survival and
dispersal in water. Species of Pjjthium and Phytophthora have been the most frequently
rrported root pathogens in recirculating hydroponics (Rey et al. 1997; Paulitz 1997;
Schuerger l992), well-suited to dispersa1 in aquatic environments with biflageellate, motiie
spores. Pyhiiim zoospores c m penetrate the root epidermis within 5 minutes of adhesion
to the root surface, followed by rapid development within the elongation zone of the roots
(Stanghellini 1988; Stanghellini and Rasmussen 1994). Virulent stmins can produce
secondary inoculum within 24 houe, which is reieased into the solution and potentially
spreads to other plants.
Classic symptoms of Pythirrm infection are brown, decayed roots coupled with
wil ting and stunting of the shoot (Rowe 1986; Agrios 1997). Generally considered to be
solely a cortical root pathogen, Pyrhium can advance into vascular tissues, like Fusaritirn and
Verticilli~rm (Chérif et al. 1991). P'h ium is commonly known to cause damping off of
seedlings (rotting at soi1 level), but young roots of plants at any stage of growth can be
aaacked by Pythium. Plants undergoing stress or flower production are also thought to be
more susceptible to infection, likely due to increased root exudation (Curl and Truelove
1986; Hamlen et al. 1972). Paulitz (1998) observed that Pyrhiunt aphaniderntartrm kills
younger hydroponically grown cucumber plants quicker than mature plants, and that wilt and
collapse of mature plants may not appear until fmit set.
The speed and severity of Pythium anack in hydroponic crops indicate the need for
remediation effons and greater understanding of the infection process From a whole plant
perspective. Ln order for an appropriate remediation method to be chosen and evaluated, a
thorough knowledge of the life and infection cycle of the pathogen is necessary. An
adequate understanding of the epidemiology is lacking for many fungal pathogens in
hydroponic systems, including Pythium. While many aspects of the mechanism or "mode
of action" of Pythium infection remain unclear, a picture of the infection process is
emerging.
Pythium Infection
There are approximately 120 species of Pythium, varying widely in host range,
virulence and pathogenicity (Martin and Loper 1999). Taxonomically, Pyrhium is classified
in the Phylum of Pseudofungi, Kùigdom Chromista (Corliss 1994), but is still commonly
refened to as a fungal species. Inoculum can be in the form of sporangia, zoospores,
mycelia, or oospores (Endo and Colt 1974). Some types of sporangia and oospores
rerminate directly by forming germ tubes but most function indirectly to produce zoospores. C
Numerous workers conclude that zoospores and mycelia function comrnonly as uni& of
inoculum (Endo & Colt 1974; Stanghellini 1988).
Infection of plants fiom zoospores follows a characteristic pre-penetration sequence
of zoospore taxis, settling, encystment, adhesion, cyst germination, and orientation of the
germ tube (Deacon 1988; Hardharn 1992; Martin and Loper 1999). Zoospore responses are
usually not host-specific and have been elucidated in vitro. Taxis occurs towards root and
seed exudates, mixtures of nutrients, and depending on the species, towards ethanol,
particular sugars and amino acids [glutamic and aspartic acid, among the most abundant
acids in root exudates (Jones et ai. 199 l)]. Zoospores also respond to light, electric fields or
water currents (Deacon 1988).
In analysis of zoospore behavior, videomicroscopy showed that Pythirrrn
aplianidennatirtn spores can swim for sevenl hours by consuming lipid reserves (Jones et
a(. 199 1). They crase moving when a chernoattractant is encountered, swell by altering
osmotic balance, and release an adhesive glycoprotein from pre-formed vesicles lying just
beneath the cell membrane (Estrada-Garcia et al. 1990). Flagellar contact directs the
orientation of the spore with respect to the source of the attractant. The naked ce11 produces
a cyst wall, made up largely of polysaccharide, then produces a germ tube which emerges
and grows towards the attracting source. The whole sequence from initial release of the
zoospore from sporangia to gem-tube emergence can take as little as 30-40 minutes. Deacon
(1985) points out it is "one of the fastest and most cornplex developmental sequences in
eukaryotic cells."
Adhesion and encystment are reponed to be regulated by fucosyl residues of root
surface mucilage (Longman and CalIow 1 98'?), pectin and other uronates (Grant et al. 1 98 5) ,
lecrins, some monoclonal antibodies, arnino acids and ions, principally Ca" (Jones et al.
199 1 ; Donaldson and Deacon 1992; lser et al. 1989; Grant et al. 1985). Proteinaceous
components on the surface of the encysted zoospore interact with terminal glycosyl residues
on mucilage in the zone of root elongation just behind the root cap (Wulff et al. 1998;
Longrnan and Callow 1987; Hinch and Clarke 1980). The elongation zone of the root and
sites of mot hair emergence and wounding are preferred sires of adhesion (Hardham 1992;
Jones er al. 199 1 ).
Cell wall drgrading enzymes are produced abundantly and diffused some distance
from the point of fungal contact (Rey et al. 1995; Benharnou and Coté 1992). Pythirrm
an-hrnomanes, P. irregulare. and P. trltinirim produced in vitro metabolites that caused
browning of root tissue. root stunting, inhibition of root hair formation, reduced fresh and
dry root weights, and sninted vegetative growth in wheat and geranium (Mojhedi ei al. 1990;
Désilets and Bélanger 199 1). P. ultimum secretes polygaIacmronases, P- l,4-glucanases and
a large diversity of cellulase isoenzyrnes (Campion et al. 1997). Highly virulent isolates
produced more cellulolytic and pectolytic enzymes than moderately and weakly pathogenic
isolates (Sadik et al. 1983). Cornparing ultrastructural degradation events caused by P.
ulthtum infection with those associated with exposure to partiaily purified culture filtrates,
similar alterations were found, indicating that observed ce11 damage is largely induced by
similar biochemical processes by toxic, difisible metabolites produced by P. ultimum
(Désilets et al. 1994), as opposed to mechanical force.
Using imrnunoenzymatic staining, Rey et al. (1997) found that formation of
sporangia on the root surface was the fint indication of Pythium establishment in tomato
roots. Exoglucanase-gold cytochemical labelling and TEM were used to study the
ultrastructural host reactions in cucumber seedlings infected with P. ultimum (Chérif et ai.
199 1 ) and in asymptomatic infection of tomato by Pythium F (Rey et al. 1998). Penemtion
of the epidermal cells by constricted hyphae or "penetration pegs" occurred just 2-7 houn
after inoculation, and hyphae reached the f i s t outer cortical layers between 24 and 48 houe,
developing through most of the inner root tissues including the cortex, endodermis,
paratracheal parenchyma cells and vascular stele within 48 to 72 hours afier inoculation.
Hyphae grew both within and between ce11 wails.
Host Responses to Pythium Infection
1. Cellular responses within the root zone of host plants
Invasion of tomato and cucumber seedlings by Pythiuni conelated with severe host
ceIl damage. Cells in the outer cortex expenenced organelle disintegration, cytoplasmic
aggregation, swelling, and shredding of ce11 walls, which showed a marked decrease in
electron density. Ce11 wall hydrolytic enzymes appeared to be produced, weakening host
cell walls and middle lameila matrices, demonstrated by an altered pattern of cellulose
distribution over walls of invaded and adjacent epidermal and cortical cells (Chérif et al.
1991: Reyer al. 1998).
Intercellular spaces of outer cortical cells of tomato were coated with a band of
electron-opaque material (Rey et ai. 1998). in the inner cortex, fiom 48 to 72 hours afier
inoculation, osrniophilic material accumulated to form large polymorphic aggregates at the
fungus/host wall interface. This material partially surrounded the invading hyphae, which
displayed disordered ce11 structure fiom increased vacuolation to mitochondrial disruphon.
The massive deposition and accumulation of osmiophilic material at sites of attempted
fungal entry suggests that inner root cells are signalled to mobilize a number of defence
strategies to halt the movement of the pathogen towards the vascular stele.
Tomato host ce11 responses to Pythium F invasion were enhanced in the pantracheal
parenchyma cells, forming hemisphenc protuberances or papillae at sites of fungal
penetration (Rey et al. 1998). Several colonized host cells filled with fibrillar aggregates,
foming a dense netsvork around the fungal wall. Both infected and uninvaded host cells
occluded with opaque flecks of electron-dense aggregated matenals. It appeared that
released aggregates rnignted inside the host cells and surrounded the fungal cells, causing
lysis. Parenchyma cells near the vascular bundles showed ce11 wall impregnation with an
osmiophilic material. Based on its texture and increased elecuon density, this matenal
contained phenolic compounds, likely lignin (Benhamou 1995). Although fythium F was
able to penetrate to the xylern vessels, the fungal ultrastructure was significantly changed.
Most invading hyphae were similar to ghost cells, with imperceptible cytoplasm and
organelles (Rey et al. 1998). Tornato xylem vessels reacted to hyphal invasion by coating
the secondary host walls with osmiophilic droplets and callose (Benhamou 1995).
Cucumber host defence reactions to P. ultimum were not as successful. By 72-96
hours afier inoculation, P. ultirnirm colonization of the vascular stele in cucurnber seedlings
proceeded by invasion of the endodermis, the pencycle and the paratracheal parenchyrna
ce1 ls (Chérif et al. 199 1 ) . Paratracheal parenchyma cells showed protoplasm disintegration,
organelle alteration, and disruption of the middle lamella matrices (Chérif et al. 1991).
Invasion of the xylem tissue occurred directly through the pit membrane between
paratracheal parenchyrna cells and xylem vessels or benveen adjacent vessels. Vessels were
frequently found to be coated by a thick layer of an amorphous osmiophilic material which
also accumulated along pit membranes and secondary thickenings of some vessels and
estended a short distance into the vesse1 lumen. In some cases, the vesse1 Iumen was
completely occluded by the emergence of tyloses fiom adjacent parûtracheal parenchyrnâ
cells.
Early in the infection process, some degradation of cucumber xylem vesse1 ce11 walls
and pit membranes was noticeable (Chérif et al. 199 1). Later, with extensive colonization
of xylem parenchyma cells and abundant hyphae present in xylem vessels, degradation of
the secondary walls and the dismption of cellulosic constinients were more pronounced. At
this point, pronounced wilting and root rot were visible. The researchers concluded that the
extensive ce11 wail degradation and colonization of xylem vessels were similar to the
vascular wilts Fusarium and Verticillium. Other Pythiltm species known to reach the
vascular elements are P. sylvaticitrn and P. dissotocurn (Nemec 1972).
2. Metabolic responses of the whole plant
Vascular occlusion or degndation has implicit consequences for host plant
metabolism, potentially interrupting evapotranspiration. Altered stomatal functioning can
influence fluxes of water and CO2 in mesophyll ceils (Ayres 198 1 b). Transpiration has been
observed to increase, decrease or not change at a11 as a result of pathogen infection.
Epidermal breakage and higher tissue permeability (Daly 1976; Agrios 1997) have been
implicated in increased water loss in host plants following infection. In contrast, restricted
wae r loss has been associated with induced stomatal closure and obstruction of vascuIar
tissue by hyphae, defence molecuies, or ce11 wall fragments (Ayres 198 1 a; MacHardy et al.
1976; Bowden et al. 1990; Abd El-Rahim et al. 1998). Stomatal apemire is also known to
be affected by hormones, such as ABA, produced during penods of water stress (Nobel
199 1).
Plant productivity and growth rely primarily on photosynthesis (Jiao et al. 1997).
Biomass production correlates strongly with accumulation of carbon fixed in gas exchange.
Daily carbon gain, less nightly C respiratory losses, provides assimilates available for plant
growth and development. in a broad range of pathosystems, a reduction in leaf and whole
plant carbon assimilation has been reponed following infection (Ploetz and Schaffer 1989;
Shtienberg 1992; Saeed et al. 1997; Jiao et al. 1999), despite an initial stimulation of leaf
photosynthesis following infection with sorne foliar pathogens (Roberts and Walters 1986;
Scholes er al. 1994). Reductions in photosynthetic activity have been amibuted to the
srnaller leaf area observed with stunted growth in infected plants, or to decreased
photosyntheric efficiency, itself related to chlorophyll content and chloroplast functioning
(Roberts and Walters 1988; Madeira and Clark 1995). Understanding the physiology
underlying disease expression in host plants is vital to devise appropriate remedial efforts.
i. hjècrion by P-vthiirm
Very few reports have dealt with the physiological basis of disease effects caused by
Pyrhiurn. ui homogenized stem tissue of highly resistant pumpkin infected with Pythium
~rltimunl, oxygen consurnption was 2.5-3.5 times greater than in healthy tissue (Takahashi
1958). Activity of oxidases, peroxidases, and polyphenoloxidase in diseased pumpkin stem
tissue was increased tsvo-to-three foid over healthy tissue. Daelmans eî al. (1972, as cited
in Endo and Colt 1974) found that peroxidase activity was not increased in Pyrhitim-infected
seedlings of tomatoes, pea and cauliflower but polyphenoloxidase activity was significantly
increased. P. ultirnrirn and P. sylvaticum elicited accumulation of the phytoalexins kievitone
and phaseollin in root tissue of hydroponic beans (Liu et al. 1995).
i i In fecrion by oiher root pathogens
An early plant response to disease, among other stresses, is stomatal closure (Ayres
198 1 a; Ayres 198 1 b). Consequently, researchers have used stomatal function and associated
gas exchange and transpiration to monitor host response in disease snidies. This has not yet
been descnbed for Fyihizirn infection, but Phyroplirhora, a cortical root pathogen related to
P i reduced net CO, assimilation 7 days after avocado plants were transplanted to
infected soi1 (Ploetz and Schaffer 1989). By 14 days, CO, assimilation was 75% lower for
infected plants. Reductions in assimilation, conductance and transpiration preceded
developrnent of shoot syrnptorns (wilting and defoliation) by several days. Phytophlhora
infection did not significantiy reduce the xylem pressure potential in avocado, measured 3
rnonths after inoculation (Nevin et al. 1990). in maize infected with Cephalosporizrni
ma~*clis, a vascular wilt pathogen, leaves of infected plants increased proline content by
about nvo-fold compared to healthy plants (Abd El-Rahim et al. 1998), a characteristic
response of plants to water deficit. The authon concluded that vascular occlusion may be
the principal cause of symptom development in late wilt disease.
in potato, significant changes in stornatal conductance and gas exchange occurred
2 weeks after inoculation with V. dahliae (Haverkort et al. 1990). Infection led to decreased
stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthetic rates even in nonsymptomatic leaves.
Infection reduced carbon assimilation rate in high light but not always in low light, and did
not affect dark respiration (Bowden and Rouse 1991b). InterceIlular CO, concentration
decreased and leaf water use eficiency increased (Haverkort et al. 1990).
Tomato infected by Furarium oqsporum f. sp. Iycopersici, another vascular wilt
pathogen, experienced marked reductions in photosynthesis and transpiration 15 days after
inoculation, measured in the youngest hilly expanded leaf (Duniway and Slatyer 197 1). Leaf
water content and water potential measurernents indicated that increased stomatal and
intracellular resistances preceded the onset of water stress in a given leaf and were associated
with a reduction in dark respiration, but not with a decrease in Rubisco activity, indicating
that decreased carbon metabolism was not directly related to reduced carboxylation
potential. Comparable levels of water stress caused liale increase in inrracellular resistance
of healrhy leaves.
Localized and whole plant metabolic responses to Pythiitm infection are critical in
understanding syrnptom development in host plants. The physiological bais of disease
caused by other root pathogens indicates several possible mechanisrns of Pythium
pathogenesis. Degradation of mot cells and the resulting cortical occlusions may reduce
hydraulic conductance, leading to stomatal closure, a subsequent decline in mesophyll
intercellular CO, concentration, and reduced CO, assimilation, with the end result of sninted
growth. Altemativeiy, roxic metabolites of fungal ongin, stress hormones produced by the
plant in response to infection, or reduced ion uptake by infected roots (Cook 1992) may
decrease CO, assimilation more directly, the backlog leading to increased intercellular CO,
concentration, encouraging reduced stomatal conductance. The reality may be a combination
of these factors.
Chapters hvo and three of this thesis will investigate whole plant and leaf
physiological responses to Pythiwn infection, in two hosts, Iettuce and chrysanthernurn.
Hypothesizing that alterations in canopy and leaf gas exchange in host plants accompany
Pythiunt root rot, the elucidation of the cascade of host physiological responses to Fythium
infection could contribute to funire efforts to combat the pathogen, such as by identibng
key traits of host resistance, finding new means to minimize rates of epidemic increase, or
improving efficacy of existing treatment rnethods.
Root Rot Epidemics in Recirculating Hydroponics
Hydroponic systems have becorne an industry standard for many greenhouse crops,
including letnice, tomato, cucumber and several ornamentals. Careh1 control of light,
temperature, nutrition and water can provide continuously optimal growing conditions,
minimizing plant stress as well as rnaximizing use of available space (MacFadyen 1984;
Srrayer 1994), resulting in better quality production and control of crop scheduling (Paulitz
1997). Maximum yields are possible (Paulitz 1997) although Hanan ( 1998) cautions that,
"quite often, the high yields amibutable to hydroponics are heralded to the point of being
misleading." Yields are higher because greenhouse hydroponic culture is intensive: al1
elements in the nutrient solution are available to the plant, so nutrient cornpetition can be
reduced, and greater plant densities c m be used (Paulitz 1997). in addition to higher yields
and speed of crop growth, advocates of hydroponics a&rn several advantages over soil
culture. Instead of soil, chemically inert growing media like sand and rockwool supply
physical support for the plants. These tend to provide more consistent rooting conditions for
the crop by having a more uniform stmcture. Hydroponic systems without substrates inchde
the nutrient film technique (NFT), with plant roots mspended in a charnel or uough over
which the nutrient solution flows in a thin film, deep flow systems, with the roots
submerged in solutions of greater depth. and ebb-and-flow, where the plants are supponed
in an inert moting medium and penodically flooded and drained by nutrient solution. An
additional advantage to hydroponics is that plant nutrition is supplied exclusively in solution
by the imgation system and not by the rooting medium, so pH and nutrient concentration are
entirely under the grower's control.
To avoid buildup of pathogen populations, ion imbalance, and potential problems
with allelopathy, commercial growers oflen discard used nutrient solutions into the
environment. As most greenhouse operations employ large solution volumes and are located
near urbanized areas, concems about environmental protection demand that pollution of
surface and groundwaten be minimized. These concerns have spurred initiation of zero
runoff recirculatlng systems in many areas, encouraged by govemmental guidelines (British
Columbia Ministry of Agriculture and Food 1998) and the possibility of future legislation
requinng extended recirculation.
Root-infecting fungi such as Pythirm and other pathogens are ubiquitous in almost
al1 soils (Hendrix 1974) and in and around greenhouse facilities. These fungi produce spores
or other reproductive structures, often in great quantities, which, borne by the wind, in dust,
raindrops, irrigation water, on insects, workers' shoes or clothing, wili eventually find their
way into the greenhouse (Hockenhull and Funck-Jensen 1983; Paulitz 1997; White 1998).
Once a root-infecting pathogen has been introduced to a hydroponic system, its dispersal
may occur by solution recirculation or by root-to-root contact (Stanghellini 1988). Many
fungal root pathogens can grow, by hyphae, from an infected to a healthy root. Rapid and
uniform dispersal of spores is enhanced by recirculation of infected nutrient solution.
Stanghellini ( 1988) asserts that, "any infective unit, upon entry into the nutrient solution, will
eventually make contact with a root. The probability of a chance encounter is very high
when one takes into consideration the density and confinement of roots in a recirculating
system, particularly those employing the nutrient film technique."
Substantial infection and disease loss can result from a minute quantity of initial
inoculum of the pathogen. Uniform infection of one individual mature lemice plant, with
approximately 20 m of roots, could result in the production and release of about 8 million
zoospores (Stanghellini 1988). As few as 20 zoospores of fythium aphanidermatum,
introduced into the 100 L reservoir in an NFT system, caused significant losses in cucumber
production (Menzies er al. 1996). One infected transplant can spread Pyrhium to other plants
in less than a week (Rowe 1986; Jenkins and Averre 1983). Commercial production of
spinach in Arizona was abandoned due to P. aphanidermartim and P. dissotocum (Bates and
Stanghellini 1984); infected plants showed extensive root rot, wilt, severe stunting, and
dearh. Of perhaps greater concern is the ability of some fungi to cause subclinical disease:
yield reductions of up to 54% were caused by P. dissotocum in lettuce, in the absence of
visible root or foliar symptoms (Stanghellini and Kronland 1986). Yield losses by
subclinical disease are ofien not detected because al1 plants in the system are affected and
appear healthy and normal (Stanghellini 1988).
Irrespective of whether the pathogen causes clear or asyrnptomatic infection,
pathogen control in recirculating systems is abundantly necessary. in order to reduce
environmental damage by dischargmg used nutient solutions, and comply with future
govemmental regulations, recirculation systems must be implemented and recirculation time
extended. in a closed system, conditions become for favourable for disease over time, as
root exudates and other pathogen substrates accumulate. Consequently, for recirculation to
be viable, remediation of the nutrient solution is a necessary cornponent to lower, if not
eliminate, the presence of pathogens in hydroponic systems.
Emerging Technologies for Pathogen Control in Commercial Hydroponic Systems
There are several reviews available on methods of controlling pathogen populations
in recirculating nutrient solutions (Vestergard 1988; Schuerger 1992; Evans 1994; Menzies
and Bélanger 1996). It seems clear that complete sterilization is impractical, and likely
impossible. Control of root zone pathogens has frequently been directed at reduction of
rnicrobial populations or inactivation of pathogens (Evans 1994) to prevent reproduction to
problematic levels. Effective pathogen control involves sanitation practices at every point
in plant production, including the incoming water source, plant materials, growing system
surfaces, and most imponmtly in a recirculating system, the nutrient solution.
The use of füngicides in commercial hydroponics requires legal registration. and only
one is currently registered. The systemic fungicide Previcur (AgrEvo 2000), registered
spccifically for cucumber, is limited to systems involving substrate. More innovative
rechniques are required for disinfection of hydroponic solutions with wider crop ranges.
Commercially available sterilization methods include ozone, filtration, and ultraviolet
radiation (UV). Studies have shown the effectiveness, in vitro. of ozone against a wide
variety of microorganisms (Vanachter et al. 1988; Yamamoto et al. 1 990). However, several
of these researchers reponed problems with the stability of iron chelates with ozone
treatrnent. Ulnafiltration requires frequent cleaning or filter replacement due to biofilms
(Evans 1994), reducing the long term effectiveness of this method. Slow sand filtration can
effectively remove propagules of fungal and bacterial pathogens from nutrient solutions
(Wohanka 1992; Barth 1995; van Os et al. 1999). There is a trend in the greenhouse industry
to combine physical and biological remediation technologies; for example, establishment
of a biological agent such as Trichodema in a slow sand filter can increase the eficacy fiom
80% to 98.5% (Brand et al. 1998).
A promising method for physical controi of large volumes of nutrient solution is
ultraviolet radiation. Several authors have demonstrated the efEcacy of using UV to reduce
pathogen populations in hydroponic applications (Ewart and Chrimes 1980; Buyanovsky et
ai. 198 1 ; Daughtrey and Schippen 1980; Schwartzkopf et al. 1987; Wohanka 1992);
however, UV did not consistently reduce disease symptoms in tomato (Zhang and Tu 2000)
The cffectiveness of W radiation in allowing plant recovery after initial infection, as
opposed to preventing disease in the first place, remains to be seen. Most experirnentors to
date have not measured the applied dosages required for reducing viability of various
pathogenic and nonpathogenic organisms. In in vitro collimated beam assays, a dosage of
40 rn~-cm-' reduced survival of P. aphanidernratun~ zoospores (Zhang and Tu 1999). Sutton
er ai. (2000) recommended a dosage of 30-40 rn~-s*crn- ' to inactivate Pytkium and
Fiisuriu»r. using flowthrough systems comparable to commercial UV systems.
UV ndiation is germicidal in the 200-300 nm range, with peak effectiveness at
around 260 nm (Schenck 1981). Absorption of W by microorganisms resulis in
photochernical reactions in nucleic acids and proteins that are vital for reproductive and
rnetabolic hinctions (Camgan and Sakamoto 1990; Camgan and Cairns 199 1). W radiation
is therefore not technically a "sterilizing" process but rather one of inactivation. The
effectiveness relies on the dosage applied, the product of intensity and exposure time
(Morowitz 1 950; Qualls and Johnson 1983). Pathogens differ greatly in their sensitivity to
W, due to differences in ceil walls detennining U V penetration, the presence of surface
proteins capable of LN absorption, and structural differences in the DNA (Carrigan and
Sakamoto 1990). There is evidence indicating that some microorganisms can recover by
pho to-reactivation or dark incubation (Evans 1994; Zhang aiid Tu 1999). Furthermore, UV,
like ozonation, can reduce availability of some essential elements in hydroponic media.
Most of the authors conducting the above UV studies reported significant
precipitation of Fr, and Mn to a lesser extent, out of the numeot solution due to absorption
at 254 nm. The stability order of cornmon iron chelates was identified as EDDHA> DTPA>
EDTA (Acher et al. 1997) although another account lists iron citrate> DTPA > EDDHA>
EDTA (Evans 1994). Commercial mals used continuous dosing of 0.5 ppm Fe-EDTA afier
UV treatment (Evans 1994) with occasional adjustments. Mina (1 998) related that growers
in Alberta found precipitation of iron and manganese to be a problem in recirculating
systems and they preferred to use the lamps only on incoming water. W disinfection is not
recommended for plants in peat substrates, due to the humic acid released which absorbs UV
and reduces the efficacy of W treatment (Menzies and Bélanger 1996).
Vestergard (1988) concluded regarding possible methods of solution treatment, "If
the quantity [of solution] is small, pasteunzation is the most economic agent," especially
with efficient heat exchangen. "If the heat can not be reused and the recirculation rate is
high. UV sterilization must be considered the best alternative, and if the quantity of solution
is very large, ozone and different combinations using ozone [Le. ozone and UV] will be the
cheapest way to assure an adequate sterilization." While many options for remediation of
nutrient solutions are currently available commercially, and more are under development (for
example, biological control agents), many of these techniques require M e r research and
testing to handle the large volumes of solution and increasing organic load over time (Sutton
et al. 2000). There are no clear recornmendations for commercial growers as to which
treatment options are best suited to different cultural conditions. There are also no guidelines
regarding which rernediation techniques are better suited to continuous, preventative use and
which are preferable for short-term, intermittent use to control existing pathogen
contamination. Chapter 4 of this thesis deals with a senes of experiments in which UV
lamps were incorporated into recirculating hydroponic systerns, using spot treatments or
çhon term UV doses to allow plants a recovery period afier initial infection and possibly
prevent plant-to-plant secondary transmission.
Chapter 2: Photosynthesis and Plant Productivity of Lettuce (Luctuca sntiva L. cv Bella
Green) Following Infection by Pythium dissotocum
II1TRODUCTION
Regarded as one of the most important vegetables grown in Nonh Amenca, lettuce
(L<zcntca saliva L.) has a very large consumption per capita despite its relatively low
nutri tional value (Peirce 1987). Greenhouse lettuce production is a S 1 O.3M industry annually
in Canada (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 1999a); currently, there are 20.7 ha of
meenhouses dedicated to lettuce production (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 2000). in Y
1999, 100% of Ontario greenhouse lettuce was grown with the NFT method. Greenhouse
cultivars generally grown are leaf and the higher value butterhead, also referred to as Bibb
or Boston types (Peirce 1987). Bella Green, a butterhead cultivar, has cmmpled leaves with
a soft buttery texture, developing loose heads (Decoteau 2000). Lettuce is commercially
hamested while in the vegetative growth stage, pnor to the physiological demands of
fl owennç and seed formation. The relatively rapid groowth cycle, compared to greenhouse
crops such as tomato, cucumber and pepper, renders lemice an optimal mode1 system for
repeatable hydroponic pathology experiments.
The ability of pathogenic Pyihium species, including P. aphanidermafurn. P.
iwegulare. and P. ulrimum. to induce root rot, shoot wilting, and stunting is well docurnented
(Stanghellini and Rasmussen 1994; Favrin et al. 1988; Bates and S tanghellini 1984; Jenkins
and Averre 1983). A major pathogen of hydroponically grown lettuce, P. dissot~cum caused
significant yeld reductions (35-54%) with no visible root or foliar symptoms (Stanghellini
and Kronland 1986). The objectives of the experiments in this chapter were several: 1) to
quanti@ effects of root infection of lettuce by a P. dissotocurn isolate on yield as an indirect
means to estimate aggressiveness of the pathogen; 2) quanti& effects of root infection by
Pytlzilrni on physiological parameters of individual leaves and 3) whole lemice plants; and
1) Examine relationships of stage of crop development and inoculum density on severity of
disease caused by this isolate.
MATERIALS AlND METHODS
Plant Material
Seeds of Lactuca sativa L. cv. Bella Green M.I. were obtained from Stokes Seeds
Ltd. (St. Catharines, ON) and germinated in small rockwool cubes (SBSA 36-77, Grodan).
At 14 days after seeding, the plants were placed in hydroponic NFT troughs (Rehau
Industries, inc., Baie-D'Urfe, PQ) spaced 30 cm (1 2 in) apart, with 10 plants per aough.
Plants were grown to commercially harvestable maturity in a research greenhouse at 2 1 OC
day, 1 6 T night ternperatures, with ambient CO, (360 rnL*Le1) and approximately 30-60%
relative humidity. To rninimize mutual leaf shading, a planting density of 10.76 plants-m*'
( 1 plant-ft") was used. Plants were grown throughout September 1998-December 1999, with
supplementai HPS (high pressure sodium) Iighting (SonAgro 430W, Philips, Somerset, NJ)
when required to maintain a 16-hour photoperiod. Each trough had sepante nutrient
solution, continuously recirculated by a submersible pump (Little Salty mode1 1 -EUAA-MD,
Little Giant Pump Co., Oklahoma City, OK) at a flow rate of approximately 1 Lmin". Ail
solutions ( 1.15 g*L" Plant Prod 7-1 1-27 N:P:K supplemented with 0.775 g-L'l calcium
nitrate. Plant Products inc., Brampton, ON), completely changed at 14 day intervals, were
maintained at pH 6.0, adjusted by addition of NaOH when necessary, and an electncal
conductivity (EC) of approximately 2.0 mS*cm". EC and pH were continuously monitored
in each 20 L reservoir by electrodes suspended at the solution surface (Cole P m e r
Instrument Co., Vernon Hills, IL) using an Argus control system (SM 12 modules, Argus for
Windows v 1.1, White Rock, B.C.). Solution tempenture averaged 19'C.
Pythitlnt Inocirlation Protocol
Zoospore suspensions of Pythium dLrsotontm Drechsler, isolate HYüLETl,
previously isolated from commercial hydroponic lettuce, were prepared following standard
p rocedure (Dhingra and Sinclair 1995; Rahimian and Banihashemi L 979). Lemice plants
were inoculated 14,2 1, or 28 days afier transplanting (DAP) by a direct root-dipping method
for 30 minutes in spore suspensions in autoclaved 100 mL beaken at an inoculum density
of 5x10' z o ~ s ~ o r e s m L - ~ unless othenvise specified. Following inoculation, plants were
returned to the troughs. At the end of the experiment, al1 troughs, lids, reservoirs, tubing, and
pumps were scrubbed with a 0.5% Virkon (Dispar, Vétoquinol Canada hc., Joliette, PQ)
disinfecting solution. The solution recirculated through the system a minimum of 16 h,
followed by rinsing with deionized water for a minimum of 24 h.
Cliuracterizution of Growth Parameters
At intervals of 3 to 5 days throughout the growth cycle, one plant was randomly
chosen from each trough for destructive harvest for ffesh weight, leaf area, and dry weight
analysis. Statistical significance of differences between treatments was assessed by two-way
ANOVA (S-Plus 2000 Professional Release 1, MathSoft, Inc., Seattle, WA). Identification
of when differences became significant (time elapsed post-inoculation) was detetmined by
plotting linear rnodels and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Areas where the
confidence intervals did not overlap were considered statistically different.
To determine qualitative differences in shoot appearance, SPAD measurements were
taken. The portable, handheld, dual-wavelength SPAD reader (mode1 502, Minolta Co., Ltd.,
Osaka, Japan) measures "greenness" of a leaf and was used to indicate the appearance of
foliar symptoms visible to the human eye. Six separate measurements were taken of a single
leaf (several leaves, when the plants were very small) of each of 3 subsampled plants per
trough. A standard curve reiating SPAD measurements to total extractable chlorophyll in
iV.iV-Dimethylformamide (DMF) was performed following the protocol of Inskeep and
Bloom ( l985), presented in Appendix L. Statistical significance of SPAD measurements was
determined using a hvo-way ANOVA (S-Plus 2000, MathSoft Inc.).
Iflzole Plant Net CO, Erchange
Whole plant net gas exchange was measured as described previously by Dutton et
al. ( 1988) and Leonardos et al. (1994). in late afternoon the day before measurements of net
carbon exchange rate (NCER) were made, mature plants, approxirnately 28 days afier
inoculation (DAI), were nansferred fiom the greenhouse trough system to 2 L pots
containing half-strength nutrient solution. Two plants were placed in each of 4 sealed plant
chambers with temperature, humidity and CO, concentration maintained by cornputer
controls. Unless specified othenvise, temperature was set to 2 1 OC dayll6"C night, relative
humidity was set at 50%, and the COz concentration set to 350 c<L.L*' (350 ppm). High
pressure sodium lamps (1000W, Lumalu- LU 1000; GTE Sylvania Canada Ltd.) provided
photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, 400-700 nm) £Yom 400 to 1600 c<rnoI.m"*s-' as
measured by quantum sensors (Q399L-4; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE) at the top of the plant
canopy. NCER was calculated fiom initial and final CO, concentrations in the chamber
atmosphere and pure CO, injection measurements. The leafarea of the plant canopy in each
chamber was measured destructively at the end of the daily CO2 measurements using a leaf
area meter (LI-3000, LI-COR). This tissue was then dned for 48 h at 75 "C to estimate dry
weight.
Diumal gas exchange and carbon accumulation was rneasured for 36 hours
commencing with the daylight period (800 ~mol.m-'-s-l PAR) following an ovemight
equilibntion of 12 h. Carbon accumulation was calculated by integrating NCER over the 36-
hour penod. Statistical significance of total carbon accumulation was assessed by a one-way
ANOVA (S-Plus 2000).
Light response curves were generated for healthy and diseased plants by adjusting
the irradiance levels randomly throughout the day, using neutral density shading screens to
achieve irradiances of under 400 prnol-m''~s*'. Regression lines were fitted using a second-
order polynomial function and 95% confidence intervals generated (Statistical Analysis
Systern Release 6.12, SAS Institute inc., Cary, NC). Light responses were interpreted as
statistically different due to P y h h infection based on the results of a hvo-way ANOVA.
Specific irradiance levels with significant difference in NCER response were judged to be
where the confidence intervals did not overlap.
Carbon dioxide response c w e s were generated by varying the CO, levels throughout
the day. ranging From 4 0 0 PL-L" (100 ppm) to over 1500 PL-L" (1500 ppm). The
irradiance was set at 1000 irmol-m''d PAR. A two-way ANOVA on the entire data set
determined srastistical significance. Linear models were fitted using a second-order
po l ynomial function and 95% confidence intervals generated. Plant p hotosynthetic response
to CO, availability was interpreted as significantly different where the confidence intervals
did not overlap.
Leu f Gus Ekchange and Transpiration
The afiemoon pnor to an experiment, plants were transferred from the trough to a 2
L pot containing dilute nutrient solution and moved to an illuminated charnber. Steady-state
ças exchange of attached leaves was measured using an open-flow gas analysis system
described previously (Leonardos et al. 1996). Briefly, a portion of the youngest fully
rxpanded leaf was enclosed in a leaf cuvette and exposed to overhead irradiance, provided
by three JOOW HPS lamps (Lumalux. Sylvania GTE), measured at the surface Ievel of the
leaf with a quantum sensor (model LI-189, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE). The CO2 concentration
in the gas stream and its changes resulting from leaf metabolisrn were monitored with an
infrared gas analyzer (IRGA; model LI-6262, LI-COR). The dew point in the gas stream and
its changes resulting From leaf transpiration were measured with a digital humidity analyser
(model 99 1 Dew-All, EG&G). The flow rate remained constant at 0.5 L-min", monitored by
Buw meten (Cole-Parmer Instrument Cornp.). Unless otherwise noted, plants were exposed
ro an inadiance of 1050 ,urnol.rn''* s" PAR and CO, concentration in the cuvette of 350
,LL L.L" (3 50ppm). Leaf area measurements were made by imaging scanned, naced, outlines
of the exposed portion of the leaf (Scion Image, release Beta 3b, Scion Corporation).
The data obtained were used to calculate IeafNCER and transpiration at steady-state,
using the equations of von Caemmerer and Farquhar (198 1). Water use efficiency (WUE)
was determined as the ratio of leaf photosynthesis to transpiration. Stomatal conductance
for CO, was calculated fiom transpiration rates and vapour pressure differences. COz
concentration within intercellular air spaces between mesophyll cells (Ci) was calculated
from stornatal conductance, transpiration, and photosynthesis measurements (Farquhar and
Sharkey 1982). Calculations for al1 physiological parametes were based on those described
by Leonardos (1999). The SAS (SAS Institute Inc.) program containing these formulae is
provided in Appendix 2.
Light response curves of NCER, transpiration, and stomatal conductance at the leaf
level were generated by varying the irradiance frorn 50 pmol-m"d to 1300 pmol~rn~2~s"
PAR. General linear rnodels were fitted using a second-order polynomial function and 95%
confidence intervals calculated (S-Plus 2000). Responses were evaluated with a two-way
ANOVA and were considered to be significantly different at light levels where the
confidence intervals do not overlap.
Changes in photosynthetic ability and other physiological panmeters through time
were measured in lemice inocuiated with Pythium at three different stages of maturity: 14,
21, and 28 DAP. This experiment (Expenment 1) was performed From 20 January to 8
March. 1999. Experiment 2, analyzed separately, involved 14 and 2 1 DAP inoculations only
and utilized plants grown from 6 May to 18 June, 1999. Daia sets for each inoculation time
were analyzed with a two-way ANOVA. Linear or quaàratic models were fitted and 95%
confidence intervals generated. The time, measured as DAI, at which metabolic parameten
were considered significantly different was detemined by comparing confidence interval
overlap.
A dose-response study was performed fiom 21 September to 2 November, 2000
(Experirnent 3), measuring leaf photosynthesis and transpiration in lettuce inoculated at 2 1
DAP with Pythirrin at the standard inoculum density (5x 10' zoospores.&') and double that
concentration ( 1 x 1 O" zoosporesmL~'). Leaf physiological parameters were measured every
4 to 5 DAI; immediately thereafter, leaf area (LI-3000, LI-COR) and fresh weight data was
collected for each plant. Shoot tissue and roots extending f?om the rockwool cube were
placed in an oven at 75 "C for 48 hours to measure biomass gain. Data was analyzed using
hw-way ANOVA.
Specific Leaf Area
As a measure of plant "leafiness" on a dry weight basis (Beadle 1985), specific leaf
area was calculated as the ratio of leaf area to shoot dry weight. Specific leaf area was
examined in plants destnictively harvested in two experiments, comparing the effecr of
inoculation at different plant ages (14 and 28 DAP inoculations; growth characterization
study 30 March to 24 A p d , 1999) and hvo inoculum densities (5~10'zoospores~rnL~' and
1 x 1 o4 zoospores*mL~'; Experiment 3 descnbed previously) on allocation of fixed carbon to
leaf tissue.
RESULTS
Influence of Pytitium dissoiocurn on growth of lettuce
The leaf area and shoot dry weight of lettuce plants following inoculation with
P~~iliirrm dissoroctrm at 14 or 28 DAP is s h o w in Figure 2.1. Commencing at 22 DAI, and
continuing until final harvest, plants inoculated at 14 DAP showed a significant difference
in shoot fresh weight (P=O.O252) and leaf area (P=O.O l36), but not shoot (P=O.O577) or root
dry weight (P=0.3907; data not shown) cornpared to non-inoculated control plants. The
signi ficant difference in shoot:root ratio (P=0.0 169) reflects the stunted shoot growth. At
maturity, these Pythim-infected plants displayed 36.1% smaller leaf area, 35.4% less shoot
fresh weight, and 39.1% reduced dry weight compared to controls. The 28 DAP inoculation
showed no significant differences in any growth parameters compared to both controls and
14 DAP-inoculated plants. Leaves of plants inoculated at 14 DAP were flatter and less
crowded than leaves of control plants.
Whole plant gns exchange and carbon nccumulation
Whole plant photosynthesis and dark respiration rates were measured over a 36-h
period with plants at commercial maturity, approximately 28 DAI (Figure 2.2A). While there
was no appreciable difference in dark respiration rates between treatments, it was observed
that SCER of Pyhitrm-infected plants was initially lower than that of the control plants at
the start of each dayiight period, not approaching control levels of photosynthesis until mid-
aftemoon. Whole plant NCER was integrated over the 36-h period to calculate total carbon
accumulation, as shown in Figure 2.2B. Afier 36 houn enclosure, infected plants
accumulated significantly less carbon (P=0.0 144), a 16.1 % reduction compared to non-
inoculated controls. Data shown is expressed by plant dry weight.
Dry Shoot Weight [g]
I . -- . -
O ..A N
Shoot:Root Ratio
Leaf Area [cm'] A - r N N W W
U l O U i O f n O U l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P
I --
O 10 20 30
Time [ h ]
Figure 2.2 Diurnal gas exchange, A, and carbon accumulation, B, in lettuce plants measured 28 d after Pythium inoculation. Each point represents the hourly mean and standard error of 4 chambers, expressed by dry weight of enclosed plants. Noninoculated control plants ( ), inoculated plants (@). Plants were measured at ambient CO2 (350 &=L*') and 800 umol-rn4*s" PAR irradiance. L/D indicates Iight (0) and dark (I ) periods. The horizontal mis represents tirne of NCER rneasurements comrnencing with the start of the first phoropenod.
Influence of irradiance on whole plant NCER
The influence of varying irradiance levels on photosynthesis of manire plants is
s h o w in Figure 2.3. Absolute measurements of NCER, on a per chamber basis (two plants
were enclosed in each chamber), is displayed in Figure 2.3A. Control plants exhibited higher
photosynthetic rates at al1 light levels above 300 ~rno1m"s-'. Correcting for the larger size
of the control plants, Figures 2.3B and 2.3 C express NCER by leaf area and dry weight
respectively, indicating the reverse trend: at most levels of irradiance, fphium-infected
plants showed higher NCER. The differences are significant (Pc0.000 1 ) for al1 light levels
except the extrernes, c 180 pmol~m"~s*l and > 1400 ,umol-m"d NCER of infected plants was
saturatcd at 1 100 pmol.m-'.s-', while control plants do not appear to reach saturation even
at 1.1100 i r m ~ l m % - ~ PAR. infected plants had a slightly higher light compensation point, but
overlapping confidence intervals in this area indicate the difference is not statistically
significant.
Influence of CO, Concentration
In studies of short terni variations in CO, concentration in relation to net carbon
exchange of mature plants (28 DAI), whole plant photosynthesis increased with increasing
CO1 concentration. Data in Figure 2.4A demonstrate that, measured per chamber,
photosynthetic rates of non-inoculated control plants were higher than in inoculated plants
at al1 CO, concentrations measured. Adjusting for the increased biomass of control plants,
Figures 2.4B and 2.4C express NCER in tems of leaf area and dry weight. NCER in
PJ-rhictnz-infected plants was significantly higher across the range of CO2 concentrations
measured than in control plants (P<0.000 1). CO, saturation was estimated at 1000 &L-'
for both inocufated and noninoculated plants, with a maximum NCER of 6 pmol.m'2d in
-200 O 2Q@ 4C0 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
lrradiance [ .m~lm-~-s ' ' PAR]
Figure 2.3 Influence of irradiance on whole plant photosyuthesis of lettuce 28 DAI with Pyhium. Noninoculated controls ( a), inoculated plants (O). A, NCER exaressed per chamber; i of fitted regression lines and 95 % confiden& intervals = 0.96 for both control and inoc- ulated plants. B, NCER expressed by leaf area of enclosed plants; ?= 0.96 for both control and inoculated plants. C, NCER expressed by dry weight of enclosed plants; i= 0.97 and 0.95 for control and inoculated plants, respectively. Second order polynomial functions were used to fit the data. Plants were rneasured at ambient CO2 (350 p ~ * L - ' ) and 2 1 " C.
CO, Concentration [ PL-L-'1
Figure 2.4 Influence of short term variations in CO, concen- tration on whole plant NCER in lettuce 28 d afier inoculation with Pythium. Noninoculated controls ( 0 ), inoculated plants ( O ). A, NCER expressed per chamber, with ?= 0.89 and 0.90 for the fitted regression lines and 95 % confidence intervals for noninoculated controls and inoculated plants, respectively. B, NCER expressed by leaf area of enclosed plants, ?=0.85 and 0.88 for control and inoculated plants. C, NCER expressed by dry weight, 0.76 and 0.78 for control and inoculated plants.
infected plants and 4 pmolm-L-~' in control plants, measured on a leaf area basis.
Leaf chlorophyll content
SPAD values were measured in the greenhouse at several time points post-
inoculation in both inoculated and control plants. The expenment was perfomed hvice, but
due to seasonal variations in recorded SPAD values, observations of the expenmental
repetitions could not be pooled. Figure 2.5 represents SPAD values in lemice grown during
fipinter. Chlorop hyll content was significantly higher in Pythium-inoculated plants when
compared to controls (P<0.000 1) and visible to the human eye as a slight darkening of the
leaves at approxirnately 20 DAI. There was no difference between plants inoculated at 14
and Z 1 DAP (P=0.9847). SPAD measurements taken in early surnmer followed the same
trend (inoculated plants statistically different from controls, P=0.0002).
Influence of irradiance on leaf gas exchange
The influence of vaiying levels of irradiance on NCER of individual leaves of
healthy and infected plants is seen in Figure 2.6A. At light levels at and above 800
umol-m"*s", control plants had significantly higher NCER (P=0.0386). Leaves of non-
inoculated plants saturated at 1000 pmol-m"d PAR, while those of Pythium-infected plants
saturated at approximately 700 ,umolm"d and even appeared to decrease in NCER at
higher light intensities. Wilting was evident in infected plants at the highest light level so
those data were excluded, as leaves of those plants were not at steady-state. Measurements
of transpiration (Figure 2.6B) and stornatal conductance (Figure 2.6C) demonstrated similar
patterns, with significantly different responses above 400-500 pmol~m~2*s-' irradiance
(P<O.OOO 1 ) .
5 10 15 20 25 30
Days After Inoculation
Figure 2.5 SPAD measurements in lettuce following PytItium inocuiatioa. Shown are noninoculated controls ( ), plants inoculated at 14 DAP ( ), and 21 DAP-inoculated ( ) plants. Each bar represents the mean and standard error of 5 troughs, with 3 sampled plants per nough and 6 subsampled Ieaf measurements From each plant. The expenment was performed twice. A representative graph fiom plants grown under winter conditions as described in Materials and Methods is shown. 14 and 2 1 DAP treatments resulted in significantly higher SPAD measurements cornmencing at 20 DAI.
1 rradiance ~ l - r n - ~ d PAR]
Figure 2.6 Influence of irradiance on lettuce leaf physiology, 28 d post-inoculation with Pythium. Control plants ( ); inoculated plants (O). Panel A shows leaf NCER with fitted regession lines and 95 confidence intervals (?=0.96 for control plants, 0.81 for inoculated plants). B, leaf transpiration, and C, stomatal conductance, display similar trends. ~ L 0 . 9 3 and 0.8 1 for leaf transpiration of control and inoculated plants, respectively, and 0.90 and 0.70 for stomatai conductance for COZ.
Influence of stage of host maturity on leaf gas exchange and water relations
Altered gas exchange following initial P. dissotocum infection was investigated
fùrther at the level of individual leaves. Steady-state IeafNCER of 14 DAP-inoculated plants
in Experiment 1 is shown in Figure 2.7A. Individual plots with fitted regression lines and
95% confidence intervals are displayed in Figure 2.7B, to illustrate the manner in which
statistical ly significant response variables were assessed. Table 2.1 presents al1 physiological
parameters measured in plants inoculated at 14,11, and 28 DAP in Experiment I , including
leaf NCER, transpiration, water use efficiency, stomatal conductance for CO,, and mesophyll
intercellular CO2 concentration. Metabolic changes are expressed as a percentage of control
values corresponding to the three treanent groups. Also listed is the time elapsed following
Pphitm inoculation before physiological alterations were significant, and the P-value for
the significance of each physiological factor over the entire period of disease development.
Leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance were each significantly
reduced by 16 DAI in plants inoculated ai 14 DAP. Intercellular CO, decreased significantly
at 25 DAI, and water use efficiency increased at 25 DA[. Leaf NCER was reduced by 13.6%
at maturity, transpiration by 28.6%, stomatal conductance by 44.5%, and intercellular CO,
concentration by 1 1.1%. Water use eficiency increased by 5.5%.
Ln plants inoculated at 2 1 DAP, none of the metabolic parameters was significantly
altered over the course of the growth cycle. Transpiration was reduced by 5.8%, and stomatal
conductance for CO2 by 13.6%, compared to non-inoculated controls, but due to high
variation, did not differ statistically. Water use efficiency increased by 12.7%. Physiological
changes associated with inoculation at 28 DAP in Experiment 1 were similarly insignificant
even at plant maturity.
Days After inoculation
Figure 2.7A. Reduction in leaf NCER in lettuce following Pythium inoculation 14 DAP, under wintedspring conditions in Experiment 1. Each bar represents the mean and standard error of a minimum of 5 replicate plants; Noninoculated controls (m), Pythium-inoculated plants (0 ). Measurernents were taken at an irradiance of 1050 ,umol=m"*s~' PAR and ambient COt (360 uL-L"). B, Statistical interpretation of physiological parameten. ANOVA was performed on the entire data set of each treatment. In cases where the ANOVA indicated a significant difference in response, regression lines were fitted and 95 % confidence intervals generated. DAI values where the confidence intervals did not overlap were considered to be significantly different.
Table 2.1 Leaf physiological changes associated with Pythiurn root rot in lettuce plants grown under wintedspring conditions (Expenment 1) as descnbed in Marerials and Methods. KS= no significant differences were observed.
Mstabolic Inoculation Time of Change From P- Parameter Time (DAP) Significant Effects Controls at Final Value
( D M Harvest (%)
NCER
[prnol Co,-rn'.~-']
Transpiration
[rnmol ~ ,@m"-s - ' ]
Water use efficiency
S tomata t conductance
[ prno 1 C O ~ ~ - ' . S - ' ]
Intercellular CO,
[ p ~ - ~ ' l ]
The same metabolic parameters were assessed in Experiment 2, under summer
conditions. To increase repetition and reduce variation, plants were inoculated at 14 and 2 1
DAP only. Transpiration, stomatal conductance, and intercellular CO, showed significant
alterations 13 DAI in plants inoculated at 14 DAP (see Table 2.2), with significant changes
in NCER occumng at 10 DAI. WUE was not significantly affected. At rnaturity,
transpiration was reduced by 36.1% in infected plants, stomatal conductance by 44.3%, and
intercellular CO, by 15.7%. Water use efficiency was increased by 2 1.1% in infected plants
compared to noninoculated controls.
in plants inoculated at 21 DAP in Experiment 2, leaf NCER and most other
parameters showed significant changes by 7 DAI, with WUE by I O DAI. NCER was reduced
3 .3%. and transpiration by 38.6%. Again, stomatal conductance was the most greatly
affected measured variable, with a 40.9% reduction by final hamesr.
Visible shoot symptoms in inoculated plants in both experiments were not observed
until at least 2 1 DAI, and appeared as a slight darkening of leaf tissue, stunted shoot growth.
and occasionally wilting on particularly hot, high irradiance days.
Influence of inoculum density on severity of disease effects
Lemice was inoculated with Pyrhiurn at two different inoculum densities: the
standard 5x 1 o3 zoospores~ml" and 1 x 1 O" sporesmL-'. Figures 2.8.4-D show that the higher
inoculum density did not intensiQ disease effects. While the higher density resulted in
significantly reduced leaf area (P=0.0276), leaf photosynthesis (P=0.0073), and
transpiration (P=0.006 1) compared to the healthy control commencing at 18 DAI, shoot dry
weight wûs not significantly different (P=0.0944) even at the end of the experiment. Plants
inoculated with the higher inoculurn density exhibited higher leaf area (P=0.0009) and shoot
Table 2.2 Leaf physiological changes associated with Pythiurn root rot in inoculated lemice plants grown under sumrner conditions (Experiment 2) as described in Materials and Methods. NS= no significant differences were observed.
Metabolic Inoculation Tirne of Change From P- Parameter Time (DAP) Significant Effects Controls at Final Value
(DAI) H m e s t (%)
KCER 14 I O - 18.7 <O.OOO 1
Transpiration 14 13
[rnmol H ~ O . ~ * ' . S - ' ] 2 1 7
Water use efficiency 14 NS t21.1 0.099 1
2 1 I O +15.7 0.0067
S tomatal conductance 14 13
[pmol ~ O , ~ m - ' ~ s " ] 2 1 7
Days After Inoculation [DAI] Days After Inoculation [DAI]
Figure 2.8 Influence of Pythium Inoculum Density on Growth and Metabolism of Lettuce inoculated at 21 DAP. A, Leaf area, B, Shoot dry weight, C, Leaf NCER, and D, leaf transpiration. Noninoculated controls ( O ), plants inoculated with 5x 1 o3 zoospores. m ~ " ( a ), and plants inoculated with 1x1 O' zoosporesmL-'( N ). Each bar represents the mean and standard error of a minimum of 4 replicate plants. Plants were grown under fall conditions as described in Materials and Methods.
dry weight (P=0.0027), but not NCER (P=0.6775) or transpiration (P=O.6 1 15) compared
to plants inoculated with the standard inoculum density.
Specific Leaf Area
The allocation of fixed carbon to leaf tissue, based on dry weight, is presented in
Figure 2.9. In the growth charactenzation study, there were no differences in specific leaf
area between controls and plants inoculated at either 14 or 28 DAP (P=0.4872; Figure
2.9.4). Plants in Experiment 3, inoculated at nvo different inoculum densities, also showed
no significant differences in specific leaf area compared to noninoculated controls
(P=0.7007; Figure 2.98).
Days After inoculation [DAI]
Figure 2.9 Specific leaf area of lettuce inoculated with Pytirium at different stages of growth and two inoculum densities. A, Noninoculated controls ( ), inoculated at 13 ( ) and 28 ( Q ) DAP. B, Noninoculated controls ( D, inoculated with 5x 1 o3 ~ o o s ~ o r e s m L ' ~ ( ), and inoculated with l x 1 O' zoosporesml-' ( ). Each bar rep- resents the mean of a minimum of 3 replicate plants. Plants in panels A and B were gram under spnng and aunimn conditions, respectively, as described in Materials and Methods.
DISCUSSION
These data are the first showing the influence of a Pythium root rot pathogen on
carbon assimilation of host plants. In addition, the mode1 systern used of P. dissotocum in
lemice is the first such description of plant-pathogen interactions in a hydmponic systern.
Measurement of gas exchange characteristics as an indirect means to produce disease
progress curves bas been used only rarely in plant disease epidemiology. The gas exchange
methodoiogy is nondestructive, objective, and physiologically based, which may prove
important in many pathosystems where visible symptoms are delayed or insufficient, as in
the case of subclinical disease. An additional advantage in root disease studies is the ready
accessibility of the shoot compared to roots for physiological or disease measurements.
Understanding host physiological responses associated with Pythium infection of roots may
provide insishts that could lead to improved technologies to control the disease.
CVhole pianr yield and gas exchange
initial experiments to determine the aggressiveness of the P. dissotocum isolate
established that final velds were reduced by approximately 35-40% when plants were
inoculated 14 days after transplanting (Figure 2. l), which agreed with observations in
previous studies of other isolates of this species on lemice (cv. Salina; Stanghellini and
Kronland 1986) and spinach (Gold and Stanghellini 1985) at similar nutrient solution
temperatures. Final shoot yield of control plants was comparable to that of lemice in earlier
studies (Wheeler et al. 1994), and leaf area was similar to that in cornmercially-produced
hydroponic butterhead lemice purchased from a local vendor (data not shown),
demonstraiing that the cultural systern was sufficient to provide normal growth conditions.
The measurements of whole plant photosynthesis and estimation of carbon
accumulation presented in Figure 2.2 substantiated the observed growth effects associated
with Pythiirm root rot in lemice. Most of the reduction in carbon accumulation was
accounted for by the inhibition of photosynthesis in infected plants in the fint six houn of
the photoperiod, possibly due to delayed stomatal opening. A similar response was observed
in potato plants infected with Verticillium dahliae (Bowden and Rouse 1991b). in the
Irttuce studies, integration of NCER measurements during only 36 hours of enclosure
indicated that 16% less carbon accumulated in inoculated compared to noninoculated plants.
This difference, considered over the entire growth period, provides clear suppon that
reduced photoassimilation is involved in the stunted shoot growth of Pythium-infected
plants.
The lack of measured difference in dark respiration rates between healthy controls
and inoculated plants contrasted with numerous reports in the literanire in which respiration
rates increased in plants infected by pathogens. Respiration typically increases dunng the
initial hours or days after infection, but declines to normal levels at later stages of disease
development (Agrios 1997; Daly 1976). increased respiration is also associated with greater
activity of the pentose phosphate pathway in infected plants, the chief source of phenolic
cornpounds important in defense rnechanisms. It is possible that respiration initially
increased in diseased plants, but any alterations in respiration were undetectable when this
expenment was performed on the mature plants 28 DAI.
The light response curves presented in Figure 2.3 showed some unexpected findings.
Photosynthesis on a whole plant bais (Le. per charnber; Figure 2.3A) over a broad range of
light levels (100 to N400 pmol*m'f-f' PAR) was reduced in infected plants, which was
expected given the approximately 35-40% reduction in photosynthetically active leaf area
(Figure 2.1 A). However, when NCER was normalized for leaf area or dry weight (Figures
2.3B and C) of the enclosed plants, infected plants consistently displayed higher rates of gas
exchange, at al1 irradiances except the extremes. There are several possible explanations for
these observations. Differences in canopy architecture between healthy and infected plants
undoubtedly affected light interception, the efficiency of which is determined by leaf
orientation, distribution of leaf area, and canopy height (Boote and Loomis 1991). The
stunted shoot growth of Pythium-inoculated plants resulted not only in reduced leaf area and
plant height. but reduced leaf angles so each leaf of diseased plants was oriented more
perpendicularly to the light source than in control leaves, increasing light interception.
Leavrs of control plants also experienced much greater mutual shading from higher leaves
on the same plant and From the canopy provided by other enclosed plants. Whatever the
contributing factors, the end result was a much higher efficiency of light interception in
inoculated plants, as indicated by the greater rates of NCER when expressed on the basis of
biomâss.
Besides plant architecture, biochemical factors possibly contributed to increases in
photosynthetic rates in infected lemice plants. The rate of electron transport limits
photosynthesis at low irradiances, whereas NCER is fiequently limited by nbulose-1,s-
bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco) at higher irradiances (Ogren and Evans
1993). Host plant responses to disease affecting either of these factors, confounded by the
high evapontive demand in high intensity light, may be involved. Another possibility is that
plants compensate for overail reduced metabolism associated with disease by increasing
photosynthetic efficiency in some parts of the plant (Madeira and Clark 1995).
Whole plant CO, response c w e s , generated to investigate the effect of short-term
increases in COz concentration on photosynthesis of lettuce inoculated with Pythizrm (Figure
2.41, were similar to those of increasing irradiance, with infected plants showing less
productivity at ail CO2 levels when expressed per plant. Corrected for leaf area or dry weight
of the enclosed plants, infected plants had higher NCER at al1 CO, concentrations except the
lowest. Connol plants had the same photosynthetic rates at LOO0 ~ L * L " (1000 ppm) as
Pytki~inz-infected plants did at ambient CO?. This suggests that CO, enrichment in
commercial greenhouses might be able to offset crop productivity and rninirnize yeld
reducrions in infected plants pnor to harvest. Edwards (1970) found similar results in barley
leaves affected by powdery mildew and concluded that dysfunction of the photosynthetic
apparatus was unlikely to account for the low photosynthetic rates in diseased plants at
normal CO,.
Chlorophyii content in in fecied plants
Chlorophyll content of leaves, a frequently-used indicator of plant stress, usually
correlates strongly with photosynthetic capacity. Visual estimation of leaf greenness is
highly subjective, so a portable chlorophyll meter may provide more reliable evaluation. The
unitless nurnbers caiculated (SPAD measurements) correspond to actual leaf chlorophyll
concentration, estimated on a leaf area basis by traditional destructive colonmetric methods
(Monj e and Bugbee 1992; Dwyer et al. 199 1). Using the extraction procedure and equations
of Inskeep and Bloom (1985) with N,Ndimethylformamide (DMF), the equation of
y= -5 . ~ O ~ + O . ~ ~ ~ X - O . O O ~ X '
was generated, where x=SPAD value, to quanti@ the relationship of SPAD measurements
and extractable total chlorophyll in Bella Green lettuce in our greenhouse environment
(Appendix 1). Transformation of SPAD values obtained in lettuce following inoculation with
Pyrhicim (Figure 2.6) indicated that chlorophyll content increased approximately 2% in
infected plants by the end of the experiment. This observation may contribute to an
rxplanation of higher whole plant photosynthesis in inoculated plants when expressed on a
leaf area or dry weight basis.
A darkening of infected leaves was the first aboveground symptom identified in
infected plants, visible to the casual observer at approximately 2 1 DAI. A similar darkening
in leaves of potato plants infected with Venicillium duhliae was observed, associated with
the systemic phase of disease progression, in which al1 upper leaves were significantly
affected (Bowden and Rouse 199 1 a). However, the darker green leaf colour in potato was
temporary, whereas in Pythiiim-infected lettuce the colour change penisted until the
temination of the experiment. The range of SPAD values collected for control plants of
Bella Green were consistent with those recorded in a previous study using an unspecified
Icttwe cultivar (Fukada et al. 2000). It rnay be that increased chlorophyll concentration in
infectcd leaves is a snategy to compensate for reduced leaf area, or to facilitate stress
responses or defense mechanisms.
Leaf 'gas exchange and water relations
Leaf responses to varying irradiances ofien differ fiom whole plant responses, such
as saturation of NCER at lower light intensity and attainment of much higher photosynthetic
rates (Jiao et al. 1997). Lemice was no exception, as the light response curve of leaf NCER
(Figure 2.6A) was the opposite of those at the whole plant level after correction for leaf area
or dry weight: there was a higher NCER in leaves of noninoculated compared to inoculated
plants. A similar light response for leaf NCER was reported for potato infected with
Verticillizirn (Bowden and Rouse 199 1 b). Leaves of both control and inoculated plants
reached light saturation at approximately 300 ~ r n ~ l * r n * ~ . s ' ' lower light intensity than whole
p!ants.
Leaf gas exchange, mediated through stomata, must meet the cornpeting demands of
maximizing CO1 uptake while minimizing water loss. There exist several important
limitations to carbon assimilation and transpiration in the leaf, including diffûsional
resistance from leaf air spaces through stomatal pores, and boundary layer resistance, which
consists of the layer of relatively unstirred air next to the leaf surface (Taiz and Zeiger 1998).
Transpiration has the additional resistances involved in water and solute aquisition at the
root surface as well as transport through the xylem. Funher resistance considerations for CO,
in the leaf include diffusion into mesophyll cells and into chloroplasts (Nobel 1991). The
diffusion of both water vapour and CO, is controlled by concentration gradients. Therefore,
the extent of stomatal opening is somewhat dependent on guard cell CO2 concentration,
which reflects C, within the leaf. in this manner, COz enrichment of the greenhouse
atmosphere could overcome partial stomatal closure in Pytliium-infected plants.
The existence of several feedback loops complicates the detemination of stomatal
and biochemical constmints in the control of gas exchange in transpiration and NCER
(Nobel 199 1 ; Jones 1998). Biochernical limitations relate to the photosynthetic apparatus and
to enzymes and substrates involved in photosynthesis. Alterations in stomatal conductance,
the inverse of resistance, effect changes in photosynthetic or transpiration rates that c m
subsequentl y modiQ intercellular CO,, influencing conductance. Determining the nature of
the cause-and-effect relationships between stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2,
photosynthesis and transpiration is cornplex, especially considering that calculations for Ci
and stomatal conductance rely on values derived from transpiration and NCER. It must be
acknowledged that the interdependency of calculated values dernands rhat any inferred
conclusions of causality be speculative rather than absolute.
Currently, it is theoretically impossible to calculate a value to specify the stomatal
contribution relative to the mesophyll contribution to a reduction in NCER (Sharkey 1984).
To determine the limitation of biochemical photosynthetic capacity, the relationship between
NCER and C, should be developed (Sharkey 1984). For example, a situation where NCER
decreases while C, remains constant c m be interpreted as a saong biochemical as opposed
to stomatal limitation of photosynthesis (Farquhar and Sharkey 1982; PospiSilova and
Santnitek 1997). in the potato- Verticilliiirn pathosystem, the relationship between carbon
assimilation rate and intercellular CO, was unaltered compared to corirrol plants (Bowden
et al. 1990), implicating stomatal closure as responsible for initial reductions in
photosynthesis. The situation is further complicated by the realization that standard
calculations of Ci may be inaccurate if significant stomatal heterogeneity or patchy stomatal
closure exists (Jones 19%). Stomatai patchiness can be defined as the nonuniform behaviour
of stornatal apertures and the resuiting variable distribution of stomatal conductance
(PospiSilova and Santrii~ek 1997), and can be induced by npid (but not gradual) water
stress. Minimal patchiness was observed in leaves of potato plants infected with Verticilliurn,
tested by autoradiography (Bowden et al. 1990).
The reductions in carbon assimilation and transpiration observed in Ieaves of
Pyrhiurn-infected plants were generally concomitant with alterations to stomatal conductance
to CO2 and Ci (Tables 2.1 and 2.2). Stomatal conductance was the parameter rnost affected
in al1 cases except in plants inoculated at 28 DAI? in Experiment 1 (Table 2.1). The time
course of physiological alterations associated with Pythiltm infection indicated that plant age
at inoculation was a significant determinant of susceptibility, with younger plants more
affected than older plants. There was also a strong seasonal component to the variation in
disease effects observed, possibly resulting fiom differential incidences of infection by
zoospores influenced by solution temperature, and by higher evaporative demand under the
higher irndiances and temperatures experienced by summer-grown plants in Experiment 2.
Reduced water potential could affect NCER as a reduced capacity for RuBP
regeneration (Farquhar and Sharkey 1982). In a situation in which C, is higher after water
stress than in controls, despite decreased stomatal conductance, it can be concluded that
stomatal closure is not the main determinant of reduced NCER (Farquhar and Sharkey 1982).
The same conclusion rnay be drawn when Ci is unchanged despite reductions in conductance
and assimilation rate. It is evident that loss of root integrity associated with browning and
rotting, as in Pyrhitrm infection, may have a significant effect on the hydraulic efficiency of
the plant as a whole, inducing water stress in spite of the plentiful water availability in
hydroponic solutions. Defence responses in the xylem such as phenolic deposition and tylose
formation may impede the bulk flow of water to an even greater extent. Future work to
detennine the relationship of assimilation to Ci across a broad range of intercellular CO2
concentrations may clai@ the physiological responses involved in reduced NCER in
Pythirtm-infected plants. That water use efficiency, the ratio of fixed CO2 to H20 lost as
transpiration, was the only calculated parameter to increase consistently at each inoculation
time (Tables 2.1 and 2.2) indicated that stomatal closure in infected plants was a beneficial
response in maintaining intemal water statu. WUE is maximized by reductions in stomatal
opening and C, mTobel 199 1 ; Bowden and Rouse 199 1 b), as transpiration is decreased more
than NCER by partial stomatal closure.
Because lettuce roots were considered too delicate for direct measurement of
hydraulic conductance, a future experiment that may elucidate stomatal closure related to
vascular dysfunction would involve increasing relative humidity in the armosphere
surrounding infected plants, allowing opening of partially closed stomata. Results From a
humidity experirnent with potato inoculated with Verticiliim indicated that when the vapour
pressure gradient between air and leaf was reduced, stomata of diseased leaves were capable
of opening (Bowden 1989, as cited in Bowden et al. 1990). If this was found to occur with
Pj*thiton- in fected hydroponic lemice, the reduced water supp ly would be 1 inked to reduced
hydraulic conductance.
Export of photoassimiIates out of source leaves was not directly measured in these
experiments so it is difficult to definitively state that reductions in carbon assimilation were
solely responsible for the stunted growth of infected plants. However, in other esperirnents
on export of radiolabelled carbon in Bella Green lettuce accidentally infected with fythium,
export of newly fixed carbon was reduced by approximately 20% (data not shown).
Geranium inoculated with the foliar bactenal pathogen Xanthonlonas campestris pv.
peiargonii showed reduced photosynthesis and export at both ambient and enriched CO2
(Jiao et al. 1999). Export in the dark was completely inhibited pnor to the appearance of any
visible symptoms. Daytirne export was more affected than NCER under both CO, regimes
and at al1 tirne points rneasured following inoculation, indicating that reduced biomass
accumulation could be attributable to differential translocation of fixed carbon in addition
to reduced capacity for fixation. Further study of expon in Pyrhizirn-infected lettuce could
determine more accurately the cause underlying decreased biomass accumulation leading
to stunting of the shoot.
Determination of specific leaf area, a more traditional method of estimating
allocation of fixed carbon in photoçynthesis, indicated no differences between noninoculated
sontrols and Pythim-infected plants in two experiments (Figure 2.9). These observations
provided some evidence that carbon partitioning was not a major factor causing reduced
shoot expansion in infected plants.
Cotnparisons ivich previous w r k in other pathosystems
The findings that Pythium infection significantly affected photosynthesis, and hence
productivity and growth, in lettuce augmented similar findings in potato infected with
Verricillirrrn (Saeed et al. 1997; Bowden and Rouse 199 1 b; Bowden et al. 1990; Haverkort
et al. 1990). tomato with Fzrsarium (Duniway and Slatyer 197 1), and avocado affected by
P/zv~ophthora (Ploetz and Schaffer 1989). Stomatal conductance was ofien found to be the
most sensitive indicator of disease, in ternis of both timing and magnitude of effect (Bowden
and Rouse 199 1 b). The relative timing of gas exchange effects with the differing pathogens
was variable. possibly reflecting differences in types of disease, pathogen multiplication
within host plants, and rapidity and extent of host defence responses. Previously rnost
authon have concluded that CO, limitation resulted from stomatal closure rather than direct
effects on the photosynthetic process in the mesophyll (Duniway and Slatyer 197 1; Bowden
el al. 1990), indicating opportunity to fix CO2 was the limiting factor in growth of infected
plants, rather than photosynthetic capacity. Although it seems a valid explmation, further
experiments and deeper analyses of existing data are necessary to extend that conclusion
definitively to lemice infected with Pyrhium.
In most pathosystems including lettuce-Pythium, reductions in gas exchange were
observed before the onset of visible syrnptoms. This introduces the possibility that gas
exchange rnay be used in early indication of disease. As drought stress produced similar
physiological patterns as Verticillium infection, namely decreased assimilation rate, stornatal
conductance, and Ci, in potato, cautious interpretation of gas exchange alterations will be
necessary (Bowden and Rouse 199 1 b). Fluorescence analysis in conjunction with gas
exchange rneasurement may prove useful in determining direct effects on photosynthetic
biochernistry during disease development especially when visible symptoms are not present
(Daley 1995). This may allow development of remote sensing equipment suitable for early
disease or nutrient stress detection in commercial greenhouses. The earliest possible
recognition of disease problems is crucial in order to apply appropriate treatments to prevent
epidemic development.
Eficr oj'irtoarlirrn densiy on disease severiry
Dose-response relationships between Pythium inoculum density and severity of
infection were investigated in Experiment 3 (Figure 2.8). The standard inoculum density
(5x 1 O' zoosporesml") actually produced more severe disease than did the higher
concentration, an unusual finding. In cucumber infected with Pythium aphonidermatum,
increasing pathogen inoculum concentration decreased plant dry weight, number and weight
of marketable fruit per plant, as well as h i t shelf life in a Iinear fashion (Menzies et al.
1996). Potato inoculated with Verticillium dahliae showed a delay in disease progress by 10-
15 days as a result of increasing the inoculum density by a factor of four (Bowden and Rouse
199 1 a).
Heightened cornpetition for binding sites on the lettuce root surface, possibly
accompanied by increased concentrations of cell-wall-degrading enzymes secreted by
zoospores, may have elicited a hypersensitive response or other defence responses in plants
exposed to the higher inoculum density. The hypersensitive response is a localized induced
ce11 death at the site of pathogen infection in host plants (Agios 1997) which is thought to
provide resistance to the host by limiting pathogen growth within rhe plant. Klisiewicz
(1968) reported a hypersensitive response to Pythiurn in resistant safflower. Mutual
inhibition of zoospore germination in high spore densities might be another possible
explanation for the observations in Experiment 3.
CONCLUSION
Bella Green lemice inoculated with this isolate of Pythium dissotocurn experienced
35-40% reduced growth, as measured by leaf area and shoot fresh and dry weights,
indicating that this isolate possessed moderate pathogenicity, not high enough to cause plant
death, but substantial enough to exceed subclinical classification. A major factor in the
decreased yield of inoculated plants was the reduced supply of photoassimilates provided
by gas exchange. Whole plant photosynthesis of infected plants was significantly inhibited
for the first six hours of the daylight penod, measured at commercial rnaturity, 28 DAI.
lntegrated over the 36 hour enclosure period, carbon accumulation, the main contributor to
biomass gain, was decreased by an estimated 16%, indicating that reduced photosynthetic
activi ty was at least partially responsible for stunting of Pythium-infected plants.
Whole plant photosynthetic measurernents in response to varymg levels of irradiance
and atmospheric COI in infected plants were decreased per plant compared to healthy
controls. When these measurements were nonnalized for the reduced biornass and leaf area
available for gas exchange, infected plants displayed higher NCER than controls at al1
intemediate light and CO, levels. This apparent increase in productivity was partially due
to greater light interception associated with reduction of leaf shading and the more
perpendicular leaf orientation of infected plants, and to increased chlorophyll concentration
observed in Pyrhium-infected leaves. Additional expenments such as Rubisco activity or
oxidative enzyme assays could indicate whether other biochemical factors are involved.
Exposure to higher inoculum densities did not significantly increase severity of
disease. It appears that there is a threshold for inoculum concentration surrounding root tips,
above which defence responses are induced. Investigation of NCER and transpiration at the
leaf level allowed calculations of other physiological factors that may help to hilly determine
the mechanism(s) underiying reduced productivity in inoculated plants. Several workers
shidying other pathosystems have suggested that reduced hydraulic efficiency stemming
from vascular dysfunction was the primary cause of stomatal alterations and subsequent
decreases in carbon assimilation. The physiological evidence appears to support this
conclusion with Pyrhiurn; however, further expenments are necessary to determine in finer
detail the cascade of events involved in Pythicrrn infection.
The rime course of physiological events accompanying Pythilrm infection in lettuce
drscnbed in [hie chapter is the first such study. This research confimed previous reports that
younscr seedlings are more susceptible to Pythium infection than older plants, that seasonal
variations exist with regards to disease progression, and that gas exchange alterations
precede the appearance of visible syrnptoms. The latter point substantiates recommendations
that gas exchange charactenstics rnay be usehl in early diagnosis of disease and facilitates
the exploration of fluorescence and other remote sensing equipment, already used in
quantification of saline or metal stress, as possible tools in diagnosing plant disease. Early
diagnosis of disease is cntical in optimizing remediation technologies, especially in
recirculating hydroponic systems where the nsk of rapid dispersal and epidemic
development is high. Chapter 3 of this thesis extends these gas exchange determinations to
an ornamental crop at the vegetative growth stage, chtysanthemum, infected with another
P y t h i m species.
Chrpter 3: Photosyuthesis and Plant Productivity of Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum
wurifolium L. cv. Fina) Following Infection by Pythium aphaiiidermatum
INTRODUCTION
Floriculture sales have continually nsen in Canada over the past decade, reaching
S903 million in 1998 (Agriculture and Agi-Food Canada 1999b). Chrysanthemum
(Cht?~anrhemrrni morifolizirn L.) is second only to rose in production terms, with 20.9
million stems hanrested as cut flowen and 12.8 million cuttings taken annually (Agriculture
and Ap-Food Canada 1999b). Chrysanthemum is also one of the major pot plants grown.
The inflorescence exhibits the typical composite floral morphology, radially sytnmetrical
with an outer ring consisting of conspicuous, petallike, n y fiowers surrounding a central
clustrr of minute tubular disk flowen, usually with both stamens and pistils. A series of
modified leaves (bracts) arising from the base of the flower stalk supports the head. The
flowers are edible, although generally not marketed as such. A popular cultivar in
commercial greenhouses in Ontario, Fina produces a spray of white flowers.
Single stem chrysanthemum production in soi1 is one ofthe most intensive greenhouse
cultivation systems (Hansen 1999). Improvements in production eficiencies, crop yields and
quality are in demand, as in the floriculture industry as a whole, to counter the rising influx
of cut flowers from South Amenca and other regions (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
1999b). As root rots caused by Pyrhium and other pathogens are a serious probiem in
c hrysanthemum (de Kreij and Patemotte 1999), commercial growen have viewed
recirculating hydroponics as both roo expensive and too high a risk of disease. Recently,
however, a modified NFT system has been developed for cut chrysanthemum production.
Preliminary analysis indicates that the system may result in a 50% increase in stem per unit
area production while lowenng labour and material costs (Hansen 1999). To assess the
potential for adapting recirculating hydroponics to chrysanthemum culture, experiments were
performed using physiological parameters to quanti@ susceptibility, prior to flowering, of
chrysanthemum cv. Fina to infection by Pyfhium aphanidennatrrrn in an NFT systern. The
more robust root system of chrysanthemum, compared to the fine roots of lettuce, allowed
measurement of root hydraulic conductance to determine what role changes in root hydraulic
cfficiency might play in the infection process.
bL4TElUALS AND METHODS
Plant lbl~rerial
Chrysanthemum cv. Fina cutrings were obtained fiom Erieview Acres, a commercial
chrysanthemurn greenhouse in Kingsville, Ontario, and rooted in perlite (Holiday, VIL
Vermicuiite inc., Toronto, ON) or rockwool cubes (SBSA 36-77, Grodan) for three weeks
under regular misting. Plants grown in single pot culture (Experiment 1) were rinsed in tap
\irater to remove perlite from the roots and suspended in a 1.9 L pot with a plastic foarn insert
(Identi-plugs, 14- 1 X-4OE, Fisher Scientific Ltd.) in the lid. The pots were filled with nutrient
solution ( 1.15 g . ~ " Plant Prod 7-1 1-27 N:P:K supplemented with 0.775 g*L-' calcium nitrate,
Plant Products Inc., Brampton, ON), of pH 4.5-5.5 and EC of 2.0 mS.cm", continuously
aerated with aquarium air Stones (Aqua-Fizw, A-962, Rolf C. Hagen hc., Montreal, PQ).
Chrysanthemums in Expenment 1 were grown fiom 15 February to 27 March 2000 without
supplernental lighting.
Plants rooted in rockwool cubes were transplanted into NFT troughs (Rehau industries
Inc.. Baie-D'Urfe, PQ) and fertilized with a modifieci Hoagland's solution with an EC of
approxirnately 2.1 mS.cm*' and pH of 4.5-5.5, maintained with the addition of H,PO, and
KOH as necessary. Each trough had separate nutrient solution, continuousiy recirculating by
a submersible pump (Little Salty mode1 1-EUAA-MD, Little Giant Purnp Co.? Oklahoma
City, OK) at a flow rate of 1Umin. EC and pH were continuously monitored in each 20 L
reservoir by suspended electrodes (Cole Parmer Instrument Co., Vernon Hills, iL) relaying
rneasurements (Argus SM 12 modules, Argus for Windows v 1.1, White Rock, B.C.) to a
cornputer. NFT chrysanthemums were g r o w from 16 Apnl to 8 June 2000 without
supplemental lighting (Expenment 2).
Pythium Inoculation Protocol
Zoospore suspensions of Pythium aphanidermafum (Edson) Fitzp. isolate 167,
previously isolated fkom commercial hydroponic cucumber, were prepared by standard
procedure (Dhingra & Sinclair 1995; Rahimian & Banihashemi 1979). Chrysanthemum plants
were inoculated 2 1 days afier transplanting (DAP) by a direct root-dipping method for 30
minutes in spore suspensions in autoclaved 100 mL beakers at an inoculum density of 104
zoospores.m~-'. Following inoculation, plants were retumed to their respective pots or
troughs. At the end of each study, al1 pots, troughs, lids, reservoirs, tubing, and pumps were
scrubbed with a 0.5% Virkon (Dispar, Vétoquinol Canada Inc., Joliette, PQ) disinfecting
solution. The solution recirculated through the system a minimum of 16 h, followed by
rinsing with deionized water for a minimum of 24 h. Air Stones used in single pot culture
were soaked in 2% hydrochloric acid solution for 30 minutes, rinsed several tirnes, soaked
in Aqua Plus water conditioner (Fincare #A-7655, Rolf C. Hagen Inc., Montreal, PQ) for 30
minutes to remove residual chlorine, nnsed again, and dned prior to re-use.
Wtole Plant Photosynthesis
From 25-32 DAI in Experiment 1, plants were removed fiom the troughs, placed in
1.9 L pots containing nutrient solution, and transported to the whole plant chamben descnbed
in Chapter 2. The daytime lighting period was fiom 0600h to 2000h at 1000 , u r n ~ l ~ r n ' ~ ~ s ~ '
PAR. Plants were allowed to equilibrate ovemight for a minimum of 12 h. Whole plant
photosynthesis and night respiration were measured for two sets of 36 h. The plant canopy
in each chamber was quantified after removal £kom the chambes with a leaf area meter (LI-
3000, LI-COR), followed by oven drymg at 75°C for 48 h. The total leaf area and dry weight
of plants enclosed in each chamber were used to nomalize NCER values for differences
among plant sizes. Carbon accumulation was calculated by integrating NCER over each 36
h period. Statistical significance of total carbon accumulation was assessed by a one-way
ANOVA (S-Plus 2000 Professional Release 1, MathSoft Inc., Seattle, WA).
Leaf C O Exchange and Transpiration
A procedure similar to that described in Chapter 2 was followed. Physioiogical
parameters were measured at several time points during the infection cycle in plants grown
both in single pots (Experimenr 1) and in NFT noughs (Expenment 2). Statistically
significant responses to Pythiurn inoculation were assessed by a two-way ANOVA. A linear
mode1 was fitted to the data, and 95 % confidence intervals generated. Time points where
confidence intervals did not overlap were considered io be significantly different.
Hydratrlic Conductance of Severed Root Systems
Following leaf photosynthesis measurements, NFT plants were refngerated overnight
in the dark at 4°C. Maximal hydntion was achieved by placing a plastic bag over the plants,
considered to be in a "pre-dam" state upon emergence from the refngerated chamber. Plant
stems were quickly severed approximately 5 cm (2 inches) from the base. The root system
was placed in a 10 mM NaCI solution within a pressure charnber (Soilmoisture) and
pressurized to 0.5 bar (50 kPa), foilowing the procedure of Radin & Eidenbock ( 1984). After
several minutes of equilibration, the exudate, referred to as xylem "sap", was collected for
30 min by attaching mbber tubes filled with absorbent paper to the excised stem. The amount
of collected Sap was detennined by weighing the tubes. The rate of hydraulic conductance
(expressed as pl*g"s*') was calculated using the total volume of fluid collected divided by
collection time and the dry weight of the root systern. Differences in hydraulic conductance
were determined with a two-way ANOVA.
Destrwtive Harvest
Following severance of the root systern, the shoot was separated into Ieaf and stem
portions and dried for 48 hours at 75 O C . Afier conductance rneasurements, roots extending
from the rockwool cube were removed for drymg as well. The data was used to construct
growth curves relating accumulation of biomass through time. Data was analyzed wirh a two-
way AXOVA.
RESULTS
Influence of Pytltium aphanidermatum on growth of chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum plants in Experiment 2 were destnictively harvested periodically
following inoculation by Pythium aphanidermaturn, as shown in Figure 3.1. Infected plants
showed a trend towards inhibited shoot growth, as seen in Figure 3.1 A, but this trend was not
significant (P=O. 1 107). Root dry weight, represented in Figure 3. L B. was not different
benveen treared plants and noninoculated controls (P=0.3811). The shoot:root ratio,
displayed in Figure 3. lC, reflects the increased shoot dry weight of control plants but was
also statistically insignificant (P=O.lOM).
Whole plant gas exchange and carbon accumulation
Two groups of whole plant NCER measurements were taken from plants in
Experiment 2, Set 1 from 25-28 days afier inoculation with Pythirrm. and Set 2 fiom 29-32
DAI. As the two sets were significantly different (P=0.0053), they were analyzed separately.
Similar patterns were seen whether expressed by leaf area or dry weight of the plants enclosed
in the chambers (data not shown). Data collected in Set 1 are presented in Figure 3.2A. M o l e
plant NCER was not appreciably affected by Pythium inoculation. [ntepted NCER
measurements are shown in Figure 3.2B and indicate a reduction in carbon accumulation of
4.5% in infected plants, which was not statistically significant (P=0.55 15).
Slightly older plants, measured at 29-32 DAI, did show a decrease in whole plant
NCER associated with Pythium infection (Figure 3.3A). Reduction in NCER for the first
several hours of the fust daylight penod was sirnilar to that observed in lettuce. However, the
pattern was not repeated the following day; the photosynthetic rate was steadily inhibited
throughout the second illumination period. Carbon accumulation over 36 hours was
Days After Inoculation [DAI]
Figure 3.1 Growth of chrysanthemurn cv. Fina followiog inoculation with Pyrhium aphanidermatum. A, shoot dry weight, B, root dry weight, C, shoot:root ratio; there are no statistically significant differences due to inoculation. Bars represent the mean and standard error of a minimum of 5 replicate plants. Noninoculated controls ( ) and inoculated plants ( [7 ), were grown in NFT troughs under summer conditions as described in Materials and Methods.
.
O 1 O 20 30 4 0
Tim e [hl
Figure 3.2 Whole plant gas exchange, A, and carbon rccumulntion, B, in chrysanthemum 25-28 days after inoculation with Pythium (Set 1). Each point represents the mean and standard error of 4 replicate chamben, expressed as dry weight of enclosed plants. Measurements were taken of control plants (e) and inoculated plants (@) at 1000 pmol*m'2~s-' PAR and ambient COz (350 PL-L"). L/D indicates light ( O ) and dark ( ) periods. The horizontal axis represents time of NCER measurements commencing with the start of the first photopenod.
Time [hl
Figure 3.3 Whole plant grs exchange, A, and carbon accumulation, B, in chrysanthernum 29-32 days after inoculation with fythiurn (Set 2). Values are expressed by dry weight of enclosed plants. Each point represents the mean and standard error of 4 replicate chambers. Measurements were taken of non- inoculated controls (.) and inoculated plants (O) at 1000 p n ~ l * r n ~ ~ s ~ ' PAR and ambient CO, (350 PL-L") . UD indicates light ( 0 ) and dark (l ) periods. The horizontal axis represents tirne of NCER measurements commencing with the start of the first photopenod.
significantly reduced in infected plants (P=0.0227), by 20.5% at the termination of enclosure.
Influence of Pytltium inoculation on leaf physiology of plants in single pot culture
Figures 3.4A and 3.48 demonstrate alterations in leaf photosynthesis and transpiration
associated with inoculation by Pythium aphanidermorum of chrysanthemum plants grown in
single pot culture (Experiment 1). Despite evidence of browning of root tips within 24 hours
of inoculation, there were no significant differences in leafNCER (P=O.39 16) or transpiration
(P=0.5948) at any point in the 30 days following inoculation. Water use efficiency, stomatal
conductance and intercellular COZ showed similar response patterns (data not shown).
Effect of Pythium inoculation on NFT-grown chrysanthemum
Leaf physiology measurements collected in chrysanthemums grown in troughs in
Experiment 2 are displayed in Figures3.5A-D. Browning of roots, especially root tips, was
observed within 24 hours of inoculation. Analysis of the data indicates that there were no
significant differences between infected and control plants for any of the measured
parameters: photosynthesis (Figure 3SA, P=0.0823), transpiration (Figure 3SB, P=0.5920),
stomatal conductance (Figure 3SC, P=O.j7 17), or intercellular CO, concentration (Figure
MD. P=0.4564).
Root hydraulic conductance
Hydraulic conductance, interpreted as a measure of root hydraulic efficiency, of
severed chrysanthemurn stems is presented in Figure 3.6. While control plants appear to have
a higher conductance rate immediately following inoculation (3 DAI); overall, there is no
signi ficant effect on root hydraulic conductance between infected and healthy plants
(P=0.3082).
Days After Inoculation [DAI]
Figure 3.4 Influence of Pyihium inoculation on leaf physiology of chrysanthernum grown in individual pot culture, Experiment 1 . A, leaf NCER, and B, transpiration. Each bar represents the mean and standard error of a minimum of 5 replicate plants. Noninoculated controls (1 ) and inoculated plants (O ) were grown during spring summer conditions as descnbed in Materials and Methods.
Oays After Inoculation
5 10 15 M 25 30
Oays After Inoculation
Figure 3.5 Influence of Pyrhium infection on leaf physiology of NFT chrysanthemum: A, leaf NCER, B, transpiration, C, stomatal conductance for CO2, and D, intercellular CO, concentration. Each bar represents the mean and standard error of 5 replicate plants. There were no significant differences between noninoculated controls (u ) and inoculated plants (0 ) as determined by ANOVA. Plants were grown under summer conditions (Experiment 2) as described in Materials and Methods.
10 20 30
Days After Inoculation [DAI]
Figure 3.6 Influence of Pyrhium infection on hydraulic conductance of entire chrysanthemurn root systems. Each bar represents the mean and standard error of 4 replicate plants. Noninoculated controls (u ) and inoc- ulated plants (O) were grown in NFT troughs under sumrner conditions (Expenment 2) as described in Matenals and Methods.
DISCUSSION
Gas exchange and yield in chysanthemum post-inoculation
Vegetative chrysanthemum inoculated with Pythizrrn uphanidermatum manifested few
of the disease effects observed in lemice infected by P. dissotocum, as only minimal growth
reduction occurred in infected chrysanthemum plants (Figure 3.1). No changes in whole plant
gas exchange measurements were visible in inoculated plants from 25-28 DAI (Figure 3.2),
but some reduction in NCER was observed fiom 29-32 DAI (Figure 3.3). Infected
chrysanthemum plants at 29-32 DAI showed the same pattern as lemice of reduced
photosynthesis for several hours afier illumination initiation, before approaching control
levels. Dark respiration levels were not altered in infected plants. The second d y of enclosure
in the whole plant chambers, infected plants did not repeat the gradua1 nse in NCER seen in
lemice, remaining at a relatively constant value of approximately 65% of controls. Carbon
accumulation over the 36 h enclosure period was decreased in infected plants. Whether these
reductions in whole plant gas exchange would affect flowenng or final yield remains
uncertain.
These whole plant and yield observations indicated that this particular erbium
apita~~idermotwn isolate was only weakly pathogenic at the vegetative growth stage.
Physiological parameters measured in plants cultured both in individual pots (Expen~nent 1)
and NF?' (Experiment 2) indicate no differences between noninoculated controls and infected
plants. -4s no visible shoot syrnptoms were expressed, one possible explmation is that this
isolate was responsible for subclinical disease in chrysanthemum.
Asymptomatic infection caused by Pythium aphanidematum, and P. dissotocum, has
been observed in lettuce (Stanghellini 1988; Stanghellini and Kronland 1986) and other
species. It is known that the virulence of these species is temperature-dependent. P.
dissotocitm generally predominates at solution temperatures below 2 1-23"C, whereas P.
aplianiderrnatum produces stronger disease effects at higher temperatures (Gold and
Stanghellini 1985; Bates and Stanghellini 1984). As the temperature of the nunient solution
in these experiments averaged 2 1 T, it is possible that the solution did not provide an optima!
environment for P. aphanidennafum to sufficiently infect chrysanthemum roots.
Temperature was found to influence anachment of Fioarium solani f.sp. phaseoli to
roots of mung bean (Vigna radiata), as was pH (Schuerger and Mitchell 1992). Possible
mechanisms appeared to be influences on adhesion to root surfaces and post-attachent
processes including the production of secondary inoculum on or in the host plant. pH ranging
from 4.2-7.8 did not affect susceptibility to Pythicim in lettuce (Funck-Jensen and Hockenhull
1983). The pH of chrysanthemum solutions was kept low on grower recommendations (4.5-
5); however, the pH of spore suspensions dunng inoculation, where adhesion of 64-68% of
accumulated Pythittrn spores occurs (Gold and Stanghellini 19851, was approximately 6-7.
It is a reasonable conclusion that solution temperature, pH, or interactions between both
factors negatively affected P. aphanidermatum infectivity in these studies with
chrysanthemum.
fi*drarrlic Conductance
Roots comprise one of the main resistances to water movement within plants. Most
root resistance affecting metabolism and water flow is attributed to the cortex and epidermis
(Duniway l976), where initial infection and defence responses occur. Estimates of hydraulic
efficiency in roots of diseased plants are few. ModiQmg the traditional pressure bomb
technique involving severed leaves, we applied pressure to a solution surrounding the entire
root system and measured the resulting flow rate. While it appeared that initial measurements
of hydraulic conductance were decreased in exised chrysanthemum roots (Figure 3.6; 3 DA[),
possibly reflecting activated cortical defence responses simiiar to those obsemed in
subclinical Pyrhium F infection of tomato (Rey et ai. 1998), the ovenll conductance did not
significantly differ over the 30 days following inoculation. Other vascular pathogens such as
L'euticil/iwn and Fzisarium have increased the resistance of stem segments by 4 to 60 times
the control value (Duniway 1973; Duniway 1976). In exised roots ofbarley infected with mst,
a foliar pathogen, hydnulic conductivity decreased compared to control plants starting 5 DAI
(Berryman, et al. 199 l ) , increasing to control levels at 8 DAI.
It is important to consider that changes to hydraulic conductance may be direct, by
affecting the permeability of ce11 membranes or by defensive vascular or cortical occlusions,
or indirect. via a coupling of water and solute 80w (Steudle 1989). For that matter, metabolic
alterations resulting from putative decreases in hydraulic conductance may be influenced by
ion deficiencies due to reduced uptake of nutrients as well as water. For example, low P
concentration in nutrient solutions induced decreased root hydraulic conductance in Cotton,
preceding effects on leaf area expansion (Radin and Eidenbock 1984). Peterson et al. (1 993)
found that the endodermis of corn roots was the main barrier to radial ion movement, but not
water, which was limited by ceIl membranes and the apoplast. These authon also observed
that epidermal and cortical injury resulted in minimal effect on root pressure, whereas injury
to endodermal ceils produced an immediate decrease in root pressure. Root cortex wounding
was repaired within 4 days in onion (Moon ei al. 1984). If chrysanthemum mots are found
to behave similarly, a reasonable hypothesis to investigate further may be that this isolate of
erthiurn aphanidennaturn was weakly pathogenic, causing some cortical damage and
provoking defensive responses, but not extending to the endodermis. This could explain the
initial reduction in hydraulic conductance and the subsequent negligible effects on growth,
physiological parameters, and hydraulic conductance.
CONCLUSION
Growth of chrysanthemum inoculated with Pythium aphanidermarum isolare 167 was
minimal1 y reduced. Alterations in whole plant NCER and accumulated carbon were visible
only later in the infection cycle. Measurements of leaf physiological characteristics indicated
no significant reductions in productivity associated with Pythi~im infection in plants grown
in nvo culture systems. Hydraulic conductance, intended to eludicate the interrelationships
of SCER, transpiration, and stomatal conductance observed in lettuce inoculated with P.
~lissofocirm, was observed to have an initial reduction at 3 DAI in entire root systems of
infected chrysanthemum plants, but by 8 DAI was unaltered compared to control plants. The
use of hydnulic conductance as an analytical tool was limited by the weak pathogeniciry of
the isolate used in these experirnents. This marginal virulence may have been an artefact of
the pH and temperature of the hydroponic solutions. Future experiments with a more
aggressive isolate under conditions more conducive to infection may be necessary to clariQ
the relationship between hydraulic efficiency, vascular occlusion, stomatal closure and
reductions in NCER associated with pathogen infection in other plant-pathogen relationships.
The reduction of whole plant photosynthesis and accumulated carbon seen 29-32 DAI
in chrysanthemum affected by Pythium root rot confims that gas exchange analysis may be
useful in disease diagnosis even with subclinical disease, when visible symptoms such as
stunted growth or root browning are absent or misleading. in the chrysanthemum-fyhium
pathosystem, reduced whole plant gas exchange several weeks afier inoculation raises the
possibili ty of negatively affected flower production later in the growth cycle. To address this
issue, studies in C hap ter 4 were designed, incorporating W sterilization equipment into the
troughing systems in order to observe growth of Howering chrysanthemum integrated with
solution remediation technology and interactions with Pythium inoculation.
Chapter 4: Use of Ultraviolet Irradiation of Recirculating Hydroponic Solution in
Treatment of Pythium Root Rot
INTRODUCTION
Ultraviolet radiation is a commercially available technology with documented success
in treating municipai and industrial waste water. Several reports published over the last 15
years indicate that ü V is effective, if used continuously, in reducing population numbea of
target pathogens in hydroponic solutions (Stanghellini et al. 1984; Schwartzkopf et al. 1987;
Wohanka 1992; Evans 1994); however, reduction of disease symptoms has been inconsistent
(Zhang and Tu 2000) and authors of most published studies did not accurately measure
applied dosage. Non-target bacteria in nutient solutions are also significantly affected by W
irradiation (Zhang and Tu 2000; Sutton et al. 2000).
Ln order to limit precipitation of iron chelates as well as negative effects on beneficial
microorganisms resulting fiom continuous usage, W irradiation could be used more
precisely as a short-terni, high-dosage treatrnent immediately upon detection of disease
syrnptoms or once pathogens are at predetermined critical levels. There are no published data
on the efficacy of UV in providing protection against disease increase from existing infection.
It has been proposed that UV could provide an opportunity for root regrowth and host plant
recovery while reducing or stopping the spread of hyphae or secondary spores from plant to
plant via the recirculating solution.
Minimizing problems associated with iron chelation and inadvertent elimination of
beneficial microorganisms, the efficacy of short terrn UV applications was explored in this
chapter. A one-hou, high-dosage treatment suficient to reduce pathogen populations was
appiied to reduce disease incidence. Physiological parameters were measured to provide both
an indication of plant disease expression and stress associated with exposure to W-treated
solution. However, due to technical problems encountered with modifications to the W
system, and weak pathogenicity of the Pythium inoculum as descnbed in Chapter 3, a limited
number of tests best described as preliminary are descnbed in this chapter.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant lkfaterial
Cuttings of Chrysanthemum morzYofii L. cv. Fina were rooted in rockwool cubes
For 3 weeks and transplanted into NFT troughs as described in Cbapter 3. Plants were grown
frorn 16 April to 8 June (Experirnent 1) and 13 July to 17 August 2000 (Experiment 2) with
an average day temperature of 23 O C and night temperature of 18 O C . Experiment 3 was
perfotmed without supplemental lighting fiom 19 September to 3 November 2000, under the
samr temperature regirne. Plants had initiated flower production at time of inoculation in
Experiment 3 in response to the reduced photoperiod.
in Expenment 1, plants were not exposed to the UV lamp system until inoculation,
allowing roots to develop for several weeks pnor to UV treatment. Ln Expenments 2 and 3
nutrient solutions were in contact with the UV lamp system commencing when the plants
were transplanted, allowing assessrnent of root development in nutrient solutions exposed to
the lanp housing irrespective of lamp activation.
Pythiim inocztiation
In Experiment 1, plants were inoculated for 30 minutes with a zoospore suspension
of Pytlti~trn aphanidermalum isolate 167 as described in Chapter 3. Plants in Experiment 2
were not inoculated P. aphanidennatum isolate p6 was used for inoculation in Experiment
3, following the inoculation protocol described previously.
UV Treatrnent
Imrnediately following inoculation, W iamps (Aqua W Advantage 2, Trojan
Technologies inc., London, Ont.) were activated for 60 min. The lamps were placed in line
with the recirculating solution so that solutions were exposed to U V pnor to entering the
noughs. Lamp housings were attached to the troughs with brass (Expenments 1 and 2) or
plastic (Experiment 3) fittings. Each trough receiving W irradiation had one W lamp
insralled. which was outfirted with asmall quartz window Aush with the stainless steel casing,
prrmanently attached with silver solder, to allow accurate measurement of the minimum
radiation intensity (Figure 4.1). Measurement of radiation intensity was performed dunng
the 1 -h exposure with a ndiometer (mode1 iL 1400A, International Light, Inc., Newburyport,
MA) equipped with a photodiode detector (SEL240, International Light, Lnc.). Dosage was
calculated as the product of radiation intensity and exposure time, which was estimated fiom
the solution flow rate and volume of the stainless steel casing enclosing the Iamp. The mean
dosages in Experiments 1 and 3 were 27.86 mW.s+cm" and 3 1.59 m ~ . s * c m " , respectively.
As preliminary trials indicated rapid dissociation of iron chelate, 0.2 14 g Fe-DTPA
(7% Fe, Plant Products inc, Brampton, Ont.) was added to each solution after the larnps were
turned off to replenish the available iron in solution to a level of 0.1%. Experiments 1 and
3 were organized as a randomized complete block design with four treatments: control,
control + üV, Pyrhium-inoculated, and Pythîum-inoculated + U V .
Experiment 2 employed a randomized complete block design with w o treatments:
control, and W-exposed. This experiment was performed with the W lamps in place but not
activated, and did not involve Pythium inoculation. After five weeks of recirculation, solution
sarnples were taken at the completion of the experirnent and analyzed for macro and micro
nutrients, in addition to Zn, Cu, Al, and Ni.
Figure 4.1. Cntraviolet lamp system in line with NFT chrysrnthemum. The stainless steel casing (C) has a quartz observation window (QW) flush with the interior surface to allow accurate estimation of radiation intensity. Nutrient solution is pumped frorn the reservoir, through a brass (Experiments 1 and 2) or plastic (Expenment 3) fitting (F), and flows through the lamp casing at a depth of 1 cm surrounding the W lamp. irradiated solution reaches the NFT troughs (T) through another brass or plastic fitting and flows over plant (P) roots before retuming to the reservoir.
Bionioss acctrrnrrlation and tissue analysis
Plants in Experiment 1 were hawested periodically throughout the growth period.
Data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA (S-Plus 2000, MathSoft Inc., Seattle, WA).
After the final harvest, dried samples were analyzed for elemental content, including macro
and micro nutrients, Fe, Al, Cr, Ni, and Ti. Nutrient content was evaluated statistically using
a one-way ANOVA. Plants in Expenments 2 and 3 were harvested at the end of the
rxperirnent and dried at 75°C for 48 h. Growth parameten were evaluated using two-way
ANOVA in Experiment 2 and by Scheffé's multiple mean cornparison in Expenment 3.
Leaf'Gas Exchange and Warer Relations
Physiological parameters measured in Experiment 1 were the same as in Chapter 2.
Statistically significant responses to Pythium inoculation under UV treatment were assessed
using hvo-way ANOVA.
/-@tir-aulic Conductance ofsevered Root Systerns
Root hydnulic conductance was measured in UV-exposed control and infected plants
in Experiment 1 as described in Chapter 3. Statistical analysis was perfomed using two-way
AKOVA.
Eiposirre to Brass or PIastic Fiftings
Experiment 4 was designed with 10 rooted cuttings grown in aerated single pots as
described in Chapter 3. One brass or plastic fitting, identical to those used to afix W lamp
systems to troughs, was piaced in each pot to simulate exposure of recirculating nutrient
solutions to the different fittings. Plants were grown from 11 October to 2 November 2000
and ini tiated flower production during the study. At the end of the experiment, the plants were
hanrested destructively and dried for 48 h at 75 O C . Harvest parameters were analyzed using
one-way ANOVA. Solution samples were taken at the termination of the study and analyzed
for macro ion concentrations using one-way ANOVA.
RESULTS
Influence of concurrent UV exposure and fythium inoculation on vegetative growth of
chrysanthemum: Experiment 1
Desmictive harvest measurements over 30 days following Pytlliurn inoculation and
UV solution treatment in chrysanthemum during Experiment 1 are presented in Figure 4.2A-
C. Although inoculated plants were generally smaller than controls, there were no significant
differences in shoot dry weight (Figure 4.2A; P=0.9642), root dry weight (Figure 4.2B;
P=0.529 i ), or shoot:root ratio (Figure 4.2C; P=0.9 146).
By the time of final harvest, W-exposed plants showed inhibited growth, regardless
of Pyrhilun inoculation, as seen in Figure 4.3. W exposure resulted in reduced shoot (Figure
43A; P=0.000 1) and root (Figure 4.38; P=O.O 145) dry weight in both control and inoculated
plants. Many plants exposed to W-treated nutrient solution were chlorotic throughout the
rxperiment.
Elementnl inalysis of non-inoculated plants grown in W-treated nutrient solution
Nutritional analysis of shoot and root tissue collected from plants grown in W-treated
solution is shown in Tables 4.1 and 4.2, respectively. Increased Cu and Zn concentrations
were observed in both leaf and root tissue of W-exposed plants. Additionally, UV-exposed
leaves accumulated higher P and Fe concentrations. Roots of control plants not exposed to
UV-aeated nutrient solution contained higher concentrations of Mg, Al, and Cr.
Influence of fythium inoculation on physiological parameten in plants exposed to W-
treated nutrient solution
No significant differences were observed in metabolic parameters between inoculated
plants and noninoculated controls exposed to W-treated solutions in Experiment 1 (Figure
Days After Inoculation [DAI] Figure 4.2 Biomass accumulation in chrysanthemum cv. Fina following exposure to UV-treated nutrient solution and Pyihiunr inoculation, Experiment 1. A, shoot dry weight, B, root dry weight, C, shoot:root ratio. Noninoc- ulated controls ( ); Inoculated plants ( ). Each bar rep- resents the mean and standard error of 3 plants, grown under sumrner conditions as described in Materials and Methods.
O 5 10 15 20 25 30
Days After Inoculation
Figure 4.3 Influence of UV solution irradiation on growth of chrysanthernum, Experiment 1. A, Shoot dry weight B, Root dry weight. Noninoculated controls not exposed to UV-treated solution (O), Noninoculated controls exposed to irradiated solution (a ), Pythium-inoculated plants not exposed to UV-beated solution (m), Pythium-inocuiated plants exposed to irradiated solution (H). Each bar represents the mean and standard error of 3 replicate plants. Plants were grown under summer conditions as descnbed in Materials and Methods. UV irradiation was of 1 h duration.
Table 4.1 Elemental Analysis of Chrysanthemum Leaf Tissue, Experiment 1. Data represent the mean i standard of 8 replicate plants, grown under sumrner conditions as described in Materials and Methods. UV-treated plants were grown in nutrient solution that had been irradiated for 1 h. P-Values were genented using two-way ANOVA (S-Plus 2000). BDL= Below detection limits; 5.0 mg-kg-' for Cr, Ni, and Ti. NS= No statistical analysis possible.
Element Control LN-Treated P-Value
N [%] 5.3 1 * 0.08 5.15 * 0.29 0.6 166
P [%] 0.75 k 0.03 1.20 * 0.1 1 0.0047
K [%] 7.75 * 0.3 1 7.76 * 0.47 0.9898
Ca [%] 2.02 k 0.04 2.1 1 10 .1 1 0.5 154
Mg [%] 0.23 I 0.0 1 0.25 i 0.02 0.4689
Cu [mgkg] 16.08 k 2.59 35.04 * 3.67 0.00 L 4
Zn [m&d 34.78 st 2.86 118.38 * 8.71 <O.OOO 1
Mn [mg/kgl 7 1.55 * 2.83 73.85 k 7.3 1 0.6590
B [mdk/kgl 48.43 k 1.4 1 46.0 1 3.52 0.55 17
Fe [mfiikgl 69.13 * 4.04 1 17.38 k 7.86 0.000 1
Al [mdkgl 22.50 i 2.22 18.25 3.38 0.3332
Cr b%hl BDL BDL NS
Ni [mg/kg] BDL BDL NS
Ti bg/kgl BDL BDL NS
Table 4.2 Eiemental Analysis of Chrysanthemum Root Tissue, Experiment 1. Each value represents the rnean standard error of a minimum of 7 replicate plants, grown under summer conditions as described in Materials and Methods. UV-treated plants were grown in nutrient solutions that had been subjected to 1 h irradiation. P-Values were generated using two-way ANOVA (S-Plus 2000). BDL= Below detection limits; 5.0 mg-kg-' for Ni.
Element Control UV-Treated P-Value
4.41 st 0.07
1.561 0.11
8.80 I 0.07
2.77 i 0.40
0.48 k 0.02
488.71 * 46.92
456.57 * 50.08
243.86 k 9 .O6
66.43 h 5.79
3494.29 k 23 1 .O9
857.25 * 1 18.9
17.75 k 1-60
BDL
126.0 k 10.1 1
4.4; P-values for NCER E, WUE, GCO,, and Ci, respectively = 0.0823, 0.5920, 0.6738,
0.57 17, and 0.4564).
Hydraulic conductance of chrysanthemums exposed to UV-treated solution following
fythium inoculation
No significant differences were observed in hydraulic conductance beween
inoculated plants and healthy controls exposed to W-treated solutions in Experiment I
(Figure 45A; P-value=0.734 1). Compared to plants not exposed to W-treated solutions,
there was no difference in the hydraulic conductance of exposed plants (P= 0.3 17 1).
Influence of exposure to ioactivated W system on yield of chrysanthemum:
Experiment 2
Plants in Experiment 2 experienced dramatic growth reductions when exposed to
nutrient solutions continuously recirculating through the UV lamp system, even when the
lamps were not tumed on (Table 4.3). Exposed plants had 9 1.5% and 94.3% decreased shoot
and root biomass (Pc0.000 1 ), and 48.5% increased shoot:root ratio (P=U.Z 5) compared to
control plants grown in nutrient solutions not exposed to the W lamp system.
Elemental analysis of nutrient solution in contact with inactivated UV lamp system
Samples of nutrient solutions exposed to the W lamp system in Experiment 2
contained higher NO,', Mi,-, and K* concentrations but lower PO,)-, sO,", Mg'&, and CaL-
concentrations than solutions not exposed to the UV system (Table 4.4). Of the metals
analyzed, solutions exposed to the inactivated W lamp system contained higher
concentrations of Al, Cu, and Zn than control solutions, while controls had higher Fe
content.
Water Use Efficiency A
O O O O rd O W
O /+, F rn
3 r - I q
O $ j g g g ô ; ; p : o ; a ; g q P P S ' E g s g 0 0 0 0 0 N W
Stomatal Conduclance [jimol.m~2~s~1] Transpiration [ r n m ~ l ~ m ~ ~ ~ s - ' ]
Days After Inoculation [DAI]
Figure 4.5 Hydraulic conductance of severed chrysanthemum root systems, Experiment 1. A, following W irradiation of the nutrient solution (m) and con- current Pythium inoculation and ü V solution treatment (O). B, Cornparison to non- W exposed plants. Noninoculated controls without exposure to W-treat- ed solution ( a), Noninoculated control plants grown in UV-treated solution (a, fythium- inoculated plants not exposed to UV-treated solution ( H), and plants inoculated with Pythiurn and grown in irradiated solution ( a). Each bar rep- resents the mean and standard error of a minimum of 3 repiicate plants. Pythium inoculation and plant growth under summer conditions was as described in Mat- erials and Methods. Recirculating nutrient solutions were irradiated with UV for one hour immediately following inoculation.
Table 1.3 Influence of nutrient solution exposure to innctivated UV lamp system on growth of chrysanthemum, Experiment 2. Data present the mean * standard error of 8 replicate noughs with 4 subsampled plants per trough. P-Values were generated with nvo- way XNOVA (S-Plus 2000). Plants were gram under summer conditions as described in Materials and Methods and harvested after 5 weeks of continuous solution recirculation.
Yield Parameter Control Exposed to P-Value Inactivated W Lamp System
- - -
Shoot Dry Weight [g] 1 1.372 * 0.474 0.971 * 0.062 <O.OOO 1
Root DN Weight [gl 1.1 19 5t 0.094 0.063 * 0.0 14 <O.OOO 1
Shoot:Root Ratio 10.453 20.288 0.0255
Table 4.4 Nutritional analysis of nutrient solution exposed to ioactivated UV lamp system, Erperiment 2. Solutions were sampled after 5 weeks of recirculation. Data represent the mean + standard error of 8 replicate troughs. P-Values were generated with one-way ANOVA (S-Plus 2000). BDL= Below detection limits; NS= No statistical analysis possible. Detection limits for AI=0.02 mg.^"; Cr-0.04 mg.^“.
Ion or Element Control Exposed to Inactivated P-Value [mg- L" ] W Lamp System
O
O
333.38 I 13.73
339.47 * 23.82
131.01 i 7.01
O
O
6.14 k 3.03
21.58 1.04
205.8 1 i: 9.22
BDL
BDL
0.2 1 k 0.02
1-40 k 0.13
0.24 * 0.0 1
1.68 i 0.82
O
5 17.98 i 35.27
135.82 r 9.02
84.70 * 5.37
O
10.92 i 1.32
140.62 ft 9.94
10.76 i 1.01
1 10.64 k 6.88
O. 15 k 0.05
BDL
5.99 k 0.62
0.06 * 0.02
3.95 * 0.25
Influence of concurrent W exposure and Pythium inoculation on flowering
chrysanthemum: Experiment 3
Control plants in Experiment 3 did not express significantly inhibited growth
associated with solution UV treatment or exposure to inactivated W lamp systems, presented
in Table 4.5. in plants not exposed to UV treatment, Pythium-inoculated plants showed no
significant differences compared to controls in any growth parameters including root
browning. Among UV-exposed plants, noninoculated controls exhibited a Iower incidence
of brown roots and increased leaf and total shoot dry weight than infected plants. Flower
production was not affected by either Pyrhium infection or exposure to solution irradiation.
UV irradiation of the nutnent so!ution did not appear to offer any protection fiom existing
Pytlii~rm infection as the total shoot dry weight of inoculated plants was smaller in plants
exposed to UV-treated solution. This isolate of Pyihium appears slightly more aggressive than
that used in Experiment 1 and in Chapter 3.
Influence of exposure to brass or plastic fittings on chrysanthemum growth:
Experiment 4
Exposure to nutient solutions in contact with brass fittings resulted in a much higher
incidence of root browning and formation of fewer flower buds, as shown in Table 4.6. Plants
exposed to the bnss fitrings developed a significantly higher shoot:root ratio, reflecting the
inhibited root growh of brass-exposed plants. Plants grown in brass-exposed nutrient
solutions displayed reduced nutrient uptake, as evidenced by the higher concentrations of
most ions in solution, presented in Table 4.7. Nutrient solutions in contact with brass fittings
accumulated significantly higher NO,, SO,'; NH,', K*, Mg+, Ca2-, Cu, and Zn.
Table 1.5 Influence of Pphium inoculation and one hour W solution irradiation on growth of chrysanthernum (Experiment 3). Plants had initiated flower production at time of inoculation. The rnean k standard error of 3 replicate troughs with 5 subsarnpled plants per trough are show. Values within a row with the same superscript are not significantly different as determined by Scheffé's multiple means cornpanson (Pc0.05; S-Plus 2000). Plants were grown under autumn conditions as described in Materials and Methods.
- -
Control, Control, Pythium- Pyihitim- Harvest Non-exposed to Exposed to W inoculated, inoculated, Parameter W Non-exposed to Exposed to W
UV
Roo t Browning [%]
Root Dry Weight [g]
Leaf Area [cm']
Leaf Dry Weight [g]
Xumber of Open FIowers
Xumber of Immature Flower Buds
Total Flowers
Stem and Flower Dry Weight [g]
Total Shoot Dry Weight k 1
Table 1.6. Effect of nutrient solution exposure to brass or plastic fittings on growth of chrysanthemum. Each value represents the mean * standard error of 5 replicate plants. Rooted cuttings were grown in nutrient solution exposed to either a brass or plastic fitting for 3 weeks before hmest , as described in Matenals and Methods.
Parameter Bmss Plastic P-Value
Root Browning [%]
Leaf Xrea [cm']
Leaf Dry Wright [g]
Stem Dry Weight [g]
Total Shoot Dry Weight [g]
Root Dry Weight [g]
Shoot: Root Ratio
Number of Open Flowers
Number of Flower Buds
Table 4.7. Nutrient Content of Fertiluer Solutions Exposed to Brass or Plastic Fittings, Experiment 4. Plants were grown for 3 weeks in individual pots with nutrient solutions in contact with one brass or plastic fimng (used in afixing UV lamp housing to NFT troughs) to simulate exposure. Each value represents the mean i standard error of 5 replicate solutions. P-Values were calcluated with one-way ANOVA (S-Plus 2000). NS= no statistical analysis applicable. BDL=Below detection limit of 0.05 mg. L" for Fe.
Ion or Element B rass-Exposed Plastic-Exposed P-Value [mg-L-' 1 Solution Solu lion
74.82 k 2.97
O
1047.44 * 22.87
522.02 * 1 1.93
L89.78 * 7.40
36.56 * 1.26
90.70 * 1.85
277.70 * 3.03
48.28 5 1.67
L 54.64 * 5.82
o. 12 * 0.02
6.92 I 0.32
BDL
4.80 k 0.33
DISCUSSION
Ultraviolet irradiation of recirculating nunient solutions had a negative effect on plant
growth, irrespective of Pyihium inoculation. Exposure to the UV lamp housing system, and
not solution irradiation per se, was responsible for observed negative correlations between
solution UV treatment and growth of both shoots and roots. Tissue analyses indicated copper
and zinc toxicity as the main cause of growth inhibition in plants grown in solutions exposed
to the UV system. The release of toxic Ievels of these and other elements to the nutrient
solution from lamp components appeared to be temporary, however, as plants grown in
Experiment 3 did not exhibit inhibited growth. The use of plastic instead of bras fittings in
Experiment 3 partially explains the amelioration of growth reduction associated with
exposure to the UV lamp system. Any evaluation of W as a remediation technique in
reducing incidence of disease in recirculating hydroponic solutions çhould be strictly
speculative at this point.
Copper and Zinc Toxiciîy
Growth of chrysanthemum cunings in nutrient solution exposed to the W lamp
system was affected by the extent of root development prior to exposure. Plants in
Experiment 1 with a well-developed root system were able to continue development
following exposure to nutrient solutions in contact with the W lamp housing system,
although rnuch reduced compared to non-exposed plants (Figure 4.2). In contrast, plants with
lirnited root systems in Experiment 2 were cornpletely unable to grow when exposed to
nutrient solutions in contact witb the W system (Table 4.3). The larger shoot:root ratio in
Experirnent 2 confirms that root growth was more affected than shoot growth.
Previous researchers documenting reduced plant growth as a result of exposure to W-
treated nutrient solutions suggested that growth inhibition was a result of ozone andor free
radical generation at 185 nm (Schwartzkopf et al. 1987) or excess chelate precipitation
(Acher et al. 1997) related to higher U V intensity. As our UV lamps were coated with TiOt
to filter out ozone-generating wavelengths, it is assumed that other factors were responsible
for the growth inhibition observed in Experiments 1 and 2. Acher et al. (1997) used nutrient
solution continuously irndiated with W. It would be expected that a one hour treatment? as
used in the present experiments, would avoid such massive chelate precipitation.
Tissue analyses in Experiment 1 indicated much higher concentrations of copper and
zinc in plants grown in nutrient solutions exposed to UV irradiation. Marschner (1995) states
that critical toxicity levels for these elements in leaves of crop plants are above 20-30 pg
Cwg" dry weight and 100 to >300 pg-g-' for zinc, but cautions that roots are sites of
preferential accumulation. In Experiment 1, concentration of copper in the leaves was above
rhese limits, and zinc concentration was within the toxic range (Table 4.1). W-exposed roots
had four to five times the concentration seen in non-exposed plants (Table 4.2), and displayed
extreme root inhibition in addition to discolouration. These classic signs of both copper and
zinc toxicity (Marschner 1995; Woolhouse 1983; Robson and Reuter 198 1) were
accompanied by leaf chlorosis, even though UV-exposed leaf tissue contained sipificantly
higher iron concentrations, and magnesium concentrations were comparable to non-W-
exposed controls.
It has been suggested that chlorosis associated with copper toxicity is related to lipid
peroxidation, membrane destruction (Sandmann & Boger 1983, as cited in Marschner 1995),
and acceleration of chlorophytl breakdown (Woolhouse 1983), although chlorosis is also
associated with zinc toxicity (Rauser 1973), so it is difficult to definihvely isolate the cause
of this response. CU?' and Cu3' ions blocked photosynthetic electron transport in isolated
spinach chloroplasts (Sandmann & Boger 1983, as cited in Marschner(l995). Woolhouse
( 1 983) noted that effects of Zn are less severe than Cu in tems of both root growth inhibition
and leaf chlorosis. Corn grown in hydroponic solution with high zinc concentrations showed
intemeinal chlorosis without reduced leaf Fe content (Rosen er al. 1977). Cornpetition
benveen Zn and Fe for binding sites in chloroplasts is one possible explanation of chlorosis
in zinc toxic plants with sufficient Fe content, as Zn" and Fe'havc identical ionic radii, 0.083
nm (0.74 A; Handbook of Chemisûy and Physics 1964).
in field plants, copper and zinc toxicity are often associated with acid (pH <5) soils
(Robson and Reuter 198 1; Woolhouse 1983; Marschner 1995). The low pH used in
recircuiating nutrient solutions may have been responsible for mobilizing copper and zinc
ions from cornponents of the UV lamp housing. Plumbing components of brass, an alloy of
both copper and zinc, occasionally supplemented with lead, tin, or aluminum (Encyclopaedia
Britannica 2000), are an obvious possible source of toxicity. A significant increase in root
browning associated with root exposure to the brass fittings is shown in Table 4.6
(Experirnent 4). However, the Iack of significant growth inhibition of root and shoot tissue
in that experiment, and the decrease in total shoot dry weight in Pythium-inoculated plants
exposed to W compared to inocuiated plants not exposed in Experiment 3 where plastic
fittings were used, indicates that other factors must bave connibuted to the toxicity observed
in Experiments 1 and 2.
The reduced concentrations of aluminum and chromium found in roots of W-exposed
plants (Table 4.2) suggests that these elernents were not dissolved from the stainless steel
casing and made available for plant uptake. Levels of nickel in roots of W-exposed and
control plants were similar, indicating that nickel was not rernoved from the stainless steel.
As there were no significant differences observed in titanium concentrations in exposed and
control roots, one can conclude the TiOZ lamp coating did not effect growth inhibition.
The remaining component of the W lamp system that could be affected by contact
with low pH nutrient solution is the silver solder used to anach the quartz observation
window on each lamp casing (Figure 4.1). The solder composition was listed as 56% Ag,
220h Cu, 19% Zn and 3% Sn (Weiler 2000). While manufacturing specifications listed this
solder as a braising alloy suitable for stainless steel in food applications, copper and zinc on
the surface exposed to the acidic solution could have been mobilized in contact with low pH
solution, contributing to the observed toxicity.
After several months of continuous recircuIation, al1 available ions on the inside
surface of the stainless steel casing may have been Ieached, leading to the disappearance of
toxic symptoms in Experiment 3. An alternative explanation is that iron or other elements
precipitated from the solution could have formed a protective coating over the soldered area.
Additionally, plants in Experiment 3 were undergoing flower production. At this stage root
activi ty and subsequent nutrient uptake declines as flowers become a si gni ficant carbohydrate
sink (Marschner 1995). Mobilized copper and zinc ions may not have accumulated in root
tissue at toxic levels due simply to reduced uptake.
Analysis of ions present after 5 weeks of recirculation in Experirnent 2 showed that
several ions (NO,', NH,', Kd) and metals (Al, Cu, Zn) accumulated in W system-exposed
nutrient solutions (Table 4.4). The extremely limited uptake resulting fkom minimal root
development in plants affected by copper and zinc toxicity is the probable cause of
accumulation of these elements in solution. This conclusion is supported by the observation
of significant ion accumulation in aerated nutrient solutions exposed to brass finings (Table
4.7). The reduction in pOd3-, sO,', Mg', Ca2'and Fe concentrations in W-exposed solutions
in Expenment 2 may reflect complexation with leached copper or zinc, or precipitation due
to the low pH.
U Y Dosage Consideraiions
In the hour that the UV lamps were activated, each unit volume of solution passed
through the lamp 7 times owing to the small reservoir size. Applied dosage is a function not
only of intensity and exposure time, but flow dynamics within the lamp casing, lamp age, and
reduced transmittance from precipitation or biofiims (Evans 1994; Sutton et al. 2000). The
lack of reliable literature relating UV radiation dose, pathogen inactivation, and reduction of
symptom expression (Sutton et a[. 2000; Evans 1994) confounds direct cornparisons of
results from Experiment 3 with previous work. [n a long-term, continuous irradiation study,
Zhang and Tu (2000) found no significant differences in root rot severity at several W doses
in tomatoes inoculated with P. aphanidermatztm. although a decline in Pythium populations
was observed. irradiation for 3 hours daily reduced the solution microorganism population
but correlation with disease symptorns was not investigated in this study (Buyanovsky er al.
198 1 ) .
The applied dosage in Expenments 1 and 3 was sufficient to inactivate spores,
according to previous collimated beam and flowthrough studies (Zhang and Tu 1999; Sutton
et ai. 7000). However, üV irradiation can only affect zoospores suspended in the nutrient
solution, not those attached to root surfaces. UV treatment could inactivate secondary spores
produced and released to the nutrient solution once initial Pyhium inoculum is established
as hyphae, but will not affect spore dynarnics and infectivity in the rhizosphere. There was
little evidence in Experiment 3 to support the contention that short term W solution
irradiation affords any oppominity for root regrowth in plants with existing Pythium
infection, or protection against secondary zoospore production, although longer term
experiments would be necessary to fully elucidate the risks associated with secondary spore
production in recirculating systems. Exposure to UV-treated nutrient solurions did not affect
flower production in chrysanthemum. More experiments investigating the interrelationships
between dosage, pathogen inactivation, and disease incidence are required to determine the
rfficacy of üV in pathogen control in recirculating hydroponic systems.
CONCLUSION
When root disease is detected in a hydroponic crop grown in recirculating nutrient
solution, either through early diagnosis with remote sensing equipment or by observation of
visible symptoms, removal of affected plants and treatment of the nutrient solution are
required to limit spread of disease and subsequent crop losses. in initial studies, inhibited
grotvth was obsewed in plants grown in W-treated recirculating nunient solution. The toxic
effects were expressed even when the W lamps were inactivated. Exposure to the UV lamp
system resulted in significant accumulation of copper and zinc in leaf and root tissue. It was
detemined that brass fittings used to affix the UV lamp housing to the trough could be
responsible for the increase in root browning, and could contribute to reduced nutrient uptake
and growth in brass-exposed plants. Another potential source of copper and zinc ions,
sonsidering the increased mobility of ions in low pH solution, was the silver solder on the
stainless steel casing.
Toxic effects associated with exposure to the LN lamp system were not observed in
Expenment 3, however, when plastic fittings were used in place of brass and most available
ions from the silver solder had already dissolved into solution. There was linle evidence in
Experiment 3 to suggest that short term W solution irradiation provided any protection or
afforded the oppominity for root regrowth in Pythium-infected plants, although future
experiments with a more aggressive Pythiirm isolate are necessary before any firm
conclusions may be drawn. There was no observed effect on flower production in plants
exposed to UV-treated solutions. It is possible that UV may be bener directed as a
continuous, low-dosage treatment to control pathogen populations. Considenng the paucity
of available reliable data regarding control of pathogens in recirculating hydroponic systems
with UV, and the difficulties associated with development of UV as a consistently effective
remediation tool, it is premature to evaluate the efficacy of UV as a potential treatment
tec hno l o g for commercial greenhouses.
The studies reported in this thesis confirm the hypothesis that alterations in canopy
and leaf gas exchange accompany Pythium root rot infection. Whole plant responses,
integnted as daily carbon accumulation, were obsemed in two host plants, lettuce and
chrysanthemum, inoculated with different species of Pythiurn. indicating that general
reductions in carbon fixation are not pathosystem-specific. In lettuce, leaf gas exchange and
transpiration were significantly reduced as early as 7 days after inoculation, well in advance
of visible foliar symptoms, Iending support to the possibility that gas exchange characteristics
may be used in early diagnosis of disease, a vital issue in pathogen control in recirculating
hydroponic solutions. A proposed merhod of pathogen inactivation, W irradiation of nutrient
solutions was tested in greenhouse trials; however, copper and zinc toxicity fiom the lamp
housing was observed even with lamp inactivation. Modifications to the W lamp system,
including b r a s fittings to attach lamps to NFT t~oughs, and silver solder used in allowing
accurate estimation of minimum radiation intensity, are likely sources of toxicity. Future
experiments are necessary to elucidate the relationships of alterations in gas exchange
parameten and hydraulic efficiency of roots affected by PythN~rn rot, possible negative effects
of root infection on fiower formation, and eficacy of UV in control of Pythium infection in
recirculating hydroponic systems.
LITERATURE CITED
.Abd El-Rahim M, Fahmy G, Fahmy Z (1998) Alterahons in transpiration and stem
vascular tissues of two maize cultivars under conditions of water stress and late
wilt diseasc. ~ ~ i a n t Pathology 47: 2 16-223.
Acher A, Heuer B, Rubinskaya E, Fischer E (1997) Use of ultraviolet-disinfected
nutnent solutions in greenhouses. J. Hort. Science 72 ( 1): 1 17- 123.
AgrEvo (2000) Previcur N. Aqueous solution fungicide for control of Py~hium root
diseases in greenhouse cucurnbers. Product Label Registmtion #26288. Regina,
SK, 2000.
.Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (1999a) 1998/99 Canadian Vegetables Situation and
Trends (excluding potatoes). http://aceis.agr.ca~misb/hort/veg.htrnl, last revised 24
March 1999a. Viewed 13 October 2000.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (1999b) 1999/2000 Canadian Floncultre Nursery
and Christmas Tree Situation and Trends.
http://w~vw.agr.ca/misb/h0rt/flori~2OOO.htmi, last revised December 1999. Viewed
13 Oct 2000.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (2000) Introduction to the Greenhouse Vegetable
hdustry. http://res2.agr.ca/harrow/hrcghar.htm#stats. In Greenhouse & Processing
Crops Research Centre site, last revised Sept 26,2000. Viewed 13 Oct 2000.
Agrios G (1997) Plant Pathology, 4th Ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1997.
Ayres P (198 la) Effects of disease on plant water relations. In P Ayres, ed, Effects of
Disease on the Physiology of the Growing Plant. Society for Expenrnental Biology
Seminar Series II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13 1- 148.
Ayres P (1 98 1 b) Responses of stomata to pathogenic microorganisms. In P Jarvis, T
Mansfield, eds, Stomatal Physiology. SEB Seminal Series 8. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, pp 205-22 1.
Barth G (1995) The potential for slow sand filtration for recirculating hydroponic systems
in Australia . http:ilwvw.sardi.sa.gov.au/hort~floncula3.hmi, last revised
1995. Viewed 6 May 1998.
Bntes $1, Stanghellini M (1984) Root rot of hydroponically grown spinach caused by
Pythiirm aphanidermatum and P. dissotocum. Plant Disease 68: 989-99 1 .
Beadle C (1985) Plant Growth Analysis. In J Coombs, D Hall. S Long, J Scurlock, eds,
Techniques in Bioproductivity and Photosynthesis. Pergamon Press, Toronto, ON,
pp 20-25.
Benhamou 8, Coté F (1992) Uhrasmic~re and cytochemistry of pectin and cellulose
degradation in tobacco roots infected by Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae.
Phytopathology 82: 468-478.
Benhamou N ( 1 995) Elicitor-induced resistance in tomato plants against fùngal
pathogens: ultrastructure and cytochemistry of the induced response. Scanning
~kficroscopy 9 (3): 86 1 -880.
Berryman C, Eamus D, Farrar J (199 1) The hydraulic conductivity of roots of
rust-infected barley seedlings. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 38: 407-4 15.
Boote K, Loornis R (199 1) The Prediction of Canopy Assimilation. In Modeling Crop
Photosynthesis - fiom Biochemistry to Canopy. CSSA Special Publication Number
19. Symposium Sponsored by Division C-2 of the Crop Science Society of
Amenca and Division A-3 of the Amencan Society of Agronomy in Anaheim, CA,
29 November 1988. Crop Science Society of Arnenca, inc., and Amencan Society
of Agronomy, inc., Madison, WI, pp 109- 140.
Bowden R, Rouse D (199 la) Chronology of gas exchange effects and growth effects of
infection by Verticillii<m dahliae in potato. Pllytopathologv 81: 30 1-3 10.
Bowden R, Rouse D (199 L b) Effects of Verticiliirim dohlioe on gas exchange of potato.
Phytopathology 81 (3): 293-30 1.
Bowden R, Rouse D, Sharkey T (1990) Mechanism of photosynthesis decrease by
Verticilhm dohiiae in potato. Plant Physiol. 94: 1048- 1055.
Brand T, Wohnnka W, Zinkernagel V ( 1998) Effect of biological activity on the
efficiency of slow sand filtration (abstract 3.8.5). 7th international Congress of
Plant Pathology. Edinburgh, Scotland, 9- 16 August, 1998.
British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture and Food (1998) Environmental Guidelines
for Greenhouse Growers. 5 : Water Management
http:!/www.agf.goc.bc.ca/resmgmt lfppalpubs/environ/greenhse/grnhse05.htm,
last revised 1998. Viewed 12 January 2000.
Buynnovsky G, Gale J, Degani N (198 1) Ultra-violet radiation for the inactivation of
microorganisms in hydroponics. Piant and Soi1 60: 13 1 - 136.
Campion C, Massiot P, Rouxel F (1997) Aggressiveness and production of cell-wall
degrading enzymes by Pyihium violae, Pythium suZcatiim and Pythium uftimzm,
responsible for cavity spot on canots. European Journal of Plant Pathology 103:
725-735.
Carrignn P, Cairns B (199 1 ) Disinfection applications of ultraviolet technology. Water
Conditioning & Purifcation 33 ( 1 0): 43-49.
Carrigan P, Sakamoto G (1990) Water disinfection using W technology. Water
Condiiioning & Purification 32: 24-34.
Chérif FI, Benhamou N, Belanger RR (199 1) Ultrastructural and cytochemical studies
of hngal development and host reactions in cucumber plants infected by Pythium
trlrim m. Physiologicnl und Moleatlar Plant Pathology 39: 3 53-3 75.
Cook RJ (1992) Wheat root health management and environmental concems. Can. J.
Plam Pathol. 14: 76-85.
Corliss JO ( 1994) An interim utilitarian ("User-friendlyt') heinrchical classification and
charactenzation of the protists. Acta Prororoologica 33: 1-5 1.
Curi E, Truelove B (1986) The Rhizosphere. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg,
Germany, 1986.
Daley PF ( 1995) Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis and imaging in plant stress and
disease. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 17: 167-1 73.
Daly J ( 1 976) The carbon balance of diseased plants: changes in respiration,
photosynthesis and translocation. In R Heitefüss, P Williams, eds, Encyclopedia of
Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 4, Physiological Plant Pathology.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 450-479.
Daughtrey M, Schippers P (1980) Root death and associated problems. In Acta Hort. 98:
283-29 1.
de Kreij C, Paternotte S (1999) Root discoloration, growth and micro element uptake of
chrysanthemum in aeroponics as affected by iron chelates and Pythium. In A
Papadopoulos, ed, Proceedîngs of the International Symposium on Growing Media
and Hydroponics. Acta Hort 48 1 : 159- 164.
Deacon J (1 988) Behavioural responses of fungal zoospores. hficrobiological Sciences 5
(8): 249-252.
Decoteau DR (2000) Vegetable Crops. Chapter 18: LeaQ Salad Crops. Prentice Hall,
Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000.
Désilets H, Benhamou N, Bélanger R (1994) A comparative snidy of histological and
ultrastructural alterations induced by Pyrhium ultimum or its metabolites on
geranium(Pe1argonirim) roots. Physiol. Mol. Plant Puthol. 45: 2 1-36.
Désilets H, Bélanger R (199 1) An in vitro system for studyng the effects of Pythium
rrltimurn metabolites on Pelargonium X hortonrm. Phytopathology 81: 202-206.
Dhingra O, Sinclair J (1995) Basic Plant Pathology Methods 2nd Edition. CRC Press,
Boca Raton, FL, 1995.
Donaldson S, Dercon J (1992) Role of calcium in adhesion and germination of zoospore
cysts of Pythiurn: a mode1 to explain infection in host plants. Journul ofGeneru1
hficrobioiogy 138 ( 10): 205 1-2059.
Duniway J ( 1973) Pathogen-induced changes in host water relations. Phyiopathol. 63:
458-466.
Duniway J (1976) Water Statu and Irnbalance. In R Heitefuss, P Williams, eds,
Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Senes, vol 4, Physiological Plant
Pathology. S pringer-Verlag, NY, pp 43 0-449.
Duniway J, Slatyer R (197 1 ) Gas exchange studies on the transpiration and
photosynthesis of tomato leaves affected by Fusarium O-ryspomrn f. sp.
iycopersici. Phytopath. 61 : 1377- 13 8 1.
Dutton R, Jiao J, Tsujita M, Grodzinski B (1988) Whole plant CO2 exchange
measurements for nondestructive estimation of growth. Plant Physiol. 86:
355-358.
Dwyer L, Tollenarr M, Houwing L (199 1) A nondestructive method to monitor leaf
greenness in corn. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 71: 505-509.
Edwards H (1970) Biphasic inhibition of photosynthesis in powdery mildewed barley.
Plant Physioi. 47: 324-328.
Encyclopaedir Britannica (2000) Brass, characteristics of the alloy
hrtp://~vww.britannica.com/bcom~eb/article/9/0,57 16,16479+ 1 + 16247,00.hmil?que
ry=brass. Visited 16 August 2000.
Endo R, Colt W (1974) ha tomy, cytology and physiology of infection by Pyrhium. In
Proceedings of the Amencan Phytopathologieal Society. Vol 1, 1974, pp 21 5-223.
Estradr-Garcia T, Ray T, Green J, Callow J, Kennedy J (1990) Encystment of
Pythium aphaniderrnaturn zoospores is induced by root mucilage polysaccharides,
peciin and a monoclonal antibody to a surface antigen. Journal of Erperimentai
Botany 4 1 (277):693-699.
Evans R (1994) Connol of microoqanisrns in flowing nutrient solutions. Adv. Spuce Res
14 ( 1 1 ) : 367-375.
Ewart J, Chrimes J (1980) Effects of chlorine and ultra-violet light in disease control in
NFT. In Acta Hort. 98: 3 17-323.
Farquhar G, Sharkey T (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Ann. Rev.
Plant Physiol. 33: 3 17-345.
Favrin R, Rahe J, Mauza B (1988) Pyrhium spp. associated with crown rot of cucumbers
in British Columbia greenhouses. Plant Disease 72: 683-687.
Fukada N, Suzuki K, Ikeda H (2000) Effects of supplemental lighting fkom 23:00 to
7:00 on growth of vegetables cultured by NFT. J. Japan. Soc. Horr. Sei. 69 (1):
76-83.
Funck-Jensen D, Hockenhull J (1983) The influence of some factors on the severit-y of
Pythitint root rot of lemice in soilless (Hydroponic) growing systems. In Acta Hon.
133: 129- 135.
Cold S, Stanghellini M ( 1 985) Effects of temperature on Pythiirm root rot of spinach
groown under hydroponic conditions. Phytopalhol. 75 (3): 333-3 37.
Grant B, Irving H, Radda M (1985) The effect of pectin and related compounds on
encystment and germination of Phyrophthora palmivora zoospores. Journal of
General Microbiology 13 1 : 669-676.
Hamlen R, Lukezic F, Bloorn J (1972) Lnfluence of age and stage of development on the
neutral carbohydrate components in root exudates fiom alfalfa plants grown in a
gnotobioric environment. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52: 633-642.
Hanan JJ ( 1 998) Chapter 5: Water. In Greenhouses: Advanced technology for protected
horticulture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 3 15-327.
Handbook of Chernistry and Physics (1964). 45" Edition. Ed. R Weast, S Selby, C
Hodgman. The Chernical Rubber Co., Cleveland, OH, p F89.
Hansen R ( 1 999) Chrysanthemums grown in hydroponics; toward development of a cost
effective, automated production system. In A Papadopoulos, ed, Proceedings of
International Symposium on Growing Media and Hydroponics, Windsor, Ontario,
May 1 9-26, 1997. Acta Hort 48 1 :297-304.
Hardhnm AR (1992) Ce11 biology of pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol.
43: 49 1-526.
Haverkort A, Rouse D, Turkensteen L (1990) The influence o f Verticillium dahliae and
drought on potato crop growth. 1. Effects on gas exchange and stomatal behaviour
of individual leaves and crop canopies. Neth. J. Pl. Path. 96: 273-289.
Hendrix JW (1974) Physiology and Biochemistry of Growth and Reproduction in
Pythium (Symposium on the Genus Pythium). In Proceedings of the Arnerican
Phytopathological Society. Vol 1, pp 207-2 10.
Hinch JM, Clarke AE (1980) Adhesion of fungal zoospores to root surfaces is mediated
by carbohydrate determinants of the root slime. Physioiogical Plant Pathoiogy 16:
303-307.
Hockenhull J, Funck-Jensen D (1983) 1s damping-off, caused by Pythiitrn, less of a
problem in hydroponics than in traditional growing system? In Acta Hort. 133:
137-145.
Inskeep WP, Bloom PR (1985) Extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b in
iV,iV--Dmethylformamide and 80% Acetone. Plant Physiology 77: 383-485.
Iser J, R, Griffith JM, Balson A, Grant BR (1989) Accrlerated ion fluxes during
differentiation in zoospores of Phytophthora paimivora. Ce11 Differentiation and
Development 26: 29-38.
Jenlcins S, Averre C (1983) Root diseases o f vegetables in hydroponic culture systems in
North Carolina Greenhouses. Plant Diseuse 67: 968-970.
Jiao J, Goodwin P, Grodzinski B (1999) Inhibition of photosynthesis and export in
geranium grown at two CO, levels and infected with Xanthomonas campesrris pv.
Pelargonii. Plant, Celf and Environment 22 ( 1 ) : 15-25.
Jiao J, Leonardos ED, Grodnnski B (1997) Approaches to Measuring Plant
Bioproductivity and Growth. In M Pessarakli, ed, Handbook of Photosynthesis.
Marcel Dekker, hc., NY, pp 699-704.
Jones H (1998) Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. J. Exp. Bol. 49
(Special Issue): 387-398.
Jones S, Donrldson S, Deacon J (1991) Behaviour of zoospores and zoospore cysts in
relation to root infection by Pythium aphanidermotum. iVov Phytologist 117:
289-30 1.
Iilisiewicz J ( 1968) Relation of Pythiion spp. to root rot and damping-off of safflower.
P/iytoputhology 58: 1383- 1386.
Leonrrdos E, Tsujita M, Grodzinski B (1994) Net carbon exchange rates and predicted
growth patterns in illstromeria 'Jacqueline' at varying irradiances, carbon dioxide
concentrations, and air temperatures. J. Amer. Soc. Hori. Sei. 119: 1265- 1275.
Leonardos ED, Tsujita MJ, GrodÀnski B (1996) The effect of source or sink
temperature on photosynthesis and "C-partitioning in and export Erom a source
leaf of Alstroemeria. Physiofogia Plantarum 97: 563-575.
Leonardos ED (1999) implications of photosynthetic pathways on C export in source
leaves of C3, C3-C4 intennediates and C4 Panicum and Ffaveria species (diss).
University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 1999.
Liu L, Punja 2, Rahe J (1 995) Effect of Pyfhirim spp. and glyphosate on phytoalexin
production and exudation by bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) roots grown in different
media. Physiological and Molenrlor PIant Pathology 47: 39 1-405.
Longman D, Callow J ( 1 987) Specific saccharide residues are involved in the recognition
of plant root surfaces by zoospores of Pythium aphonidermatum. Physioiogical
and Molectilar Pathology 30: 139- 150.
MacFadyen JT (1984) The allure of hydroponics. Audobon 86 (4): 12- 15.
iCIacHnrdy W, Busch L, Hall R (1976) Verticiilitirn wilt of chrysanthemum: quantitative
relationship between increased stomatal resistance and local vascular dysfunction
preceding wilr. Can. J. Bot. 54 (10): 1023-1034.
Madeira A, Clark J (1995) The pnnciples of resource capture in relation to necrotrophic
infection. dspecrs of Applied Biology 42: 19-3 1 .
Marschner H (1995) Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2" Ed. Academic Press, San
Diego, CA, 1995.
Martin F, Loper J (1999) Soilbome plant diseases caused by Pyhiitm spp.: Ecology,
epidemiology, and propects for biological control. In Critical Reviews in Plant
Sciences. l8(2): 1 1 1 - 18 1, 1999.
Menzies J, Bélanger R ( 1 996) Recent advances in cultural management of diseases of
greenhouse crops. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 18: 1 86- 193.
hlenzies J, Ehret D, Stan S (1996) Effect of inoculum density of Pythium
aphanidermatrrm on the growth and yield of cucumber plants grown in
recirculating nutrient film culture. Can. J. Plant. Pathol. 18: 50-54.
kfirzr hI ( 1998) W stenlization of recirculating hydroponic systerns. Persona1
communication [Greenhouse Crops Specialist], Alberta AgTiculture, Food, and
Rural Development, 12 June, 1998.
Mojhedi H, Singleton L, Melouk H, Waller G (1990) Reproduction of symptoms of a
root disase of wheat by toxic metabolites produced by two Fyihium species and
their partial characterization. J. Phytopathology 128: 246-256.
Monje OA, Bugbee B (1 992) Lnherent limitations of nondestructive chlorophyll meters:
A cornparison of two types of meten. HortScience 27 (1): 69-7 1.
Moon G, Peterson C, Peterson R (1984) Stnictural, chemical, and permeability changes
following wounding in onion roots. Cm. J. Bot. 62: 2253-2259.
Morowitz HJ ( 19%) Absorption effects in volume irradiation of microorganisms. Science
1 1 1: 229-230.
Yemec S ( 1972) Histopathology of Pythium infected strawbeny roots. Can. J. Bot. 50:
1091.
Yevin JM, Lovatt C, Eaks IL, Ohr HD (1990) Separation of the effects of drought and
infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi on 'Hass' avocado. In Acta Hon. 275:
729-736.
Yobel PS (199 1) Physicochemical and Environmentai Plant Physiology. Academic Press,
Inc., San Diego, CA, 199 1.
Ogren E, Evans J (1993) Photosynthetic light-response cuves. 1. The influence of CO2
partial pressure and leaf inversion. Planta 189: 182- 190.
Pnulitz T (1997) Biological control of root pathogens in soilless and hydmponic systems.
HortScience 32 (2): 193-196.
Paulitz T ( 1998) Questions on Pythium biocontrol. Persona1 communication, 23 July,
1998.
Peirce LC (1987) Vegetables: Characteristics, Production and Marketing. Chapter 13:
LeaQ Salad Crops. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY, 1987.
Peterson C, Murrmann M, Steudle E (1993) Location of the major barriers to water and
ion movement in young roots of Zeu mays L. PIanta 190: 127-136.
Ploetz R, Schaffer B (1989) Effects of flooding and Phytophthora mot rot on net gas
exchange and growth of avocado. Phytopathology 79: 204-208.
PospiSilova J, Santnitek J (1997) Stomatal Patchiness: Effects on Photosynthesis. In M
Pessarakli, ed, Handbook of Photosynthesis. Marccl Dekker, hc., NY, pp 427-44 1.
Qualis RG, Johnson JD (1983) Bioassay and dose measurement in UV disinfection.
.4pplied and Environmental Microbiologv 45 (3): 872-877.
Radin J, Eidenbock hl ( 1984) Hydraulic conductance as a factor limiting leaf expansion
of phosphonis-deficient Cotton plants. Plant Physiol. 75: 372-377.
Rahimian RI, Banihashemi Z (1979) A method for obtaining zoospores of P')thicirn
aphanidermatum and their use in detemining cucurbit seedling resistance to
damping-off. Plant Dis. Rep. 63: 658-66 1.
Rauser W ( 1973) Zinc toxicity in hydroponic culture. Cm. J. Bot. 51: 30 1-304.
Rey P, Nodet P, Tirilly Y (1997) Pythium F induce a minor but ubiquitous disease in
tomato soilless cultures. Journal of Plant Pathology 79 ( 3 ) : 173- 180.
Rey P, Benhamou ;Y, Tirilly Y (1998) Ultrastructural and cytochemical investigation of
asyrnptomatic infection by P ' h i u m spp. Phytopathology 88: 234-244.
Roberts A, Walters D (1988) Photosynthesis in discrete regions of leek leaves with the
rus t, Puccinia allii Rud. New Phytol. 1 10: 3 7 1-376.
Roberts AM, Walters DR (1986) Stimulation of photosynthesis in uninfected Ieaves of
rut-infected leeks. Annals of Botany 56: 893-896.
Robson A, Reuter D (198 1) Diagnosis of copper deficiency and toxicity. In J Loneragan,
A Robson, R Graham, eds, Copper in Soils and Plants. Academic Press, London,
pp 287-3 12.
Rosen J, Pike C, Golden M (1977) Zinc, iron, and chlorophyll metabolism in zinc-toxic
corn. Plant Physiol. 59: 1085-1087.
Ro we RC ( 1 986) Control Pythiurn on greenhouse vegetables. dmerican Vegerable
Grorver 34: 52-56.
Sadik E, Payak R.1, Mehta S (1983) Some biochemical aspects of host-pathogen
interactions in Pythiurn stalk root of maize: 1. Role of toxin, pectolytic and
cellulolytic enzymes in pathogenesis. Acta Phytopalhologica Academiae
Scientiantm Hungaricae 18 (4): 26 1-269.
Sneed IA, MacGuidwin A, Rouse D (1997) Disease progress based on effects of
Verticillium dahliae and Pratyienchus penetrans on gas exchange in Russet
Burbank Potato. Phytopathoiogy 87: 440-445.
Schenck GO (198 1 ) UItraviolet sterilzation. In W Lorch, ed, Handbook of water
puri fication. McGraw-Hill Book Company (UK) Ltd., pp 363 -426.
Scholes J, Lee P, Horton P, Lewis D (1994) Invertase: understanding changes in the
photosynthetic and carbohydrate metabolism of barley leaves infected with
powdery mildew. New Phytof. 126: 2 13-222.
Schuerger AC (1992) Alternative methods for controlling root diseases in hydroponic
systerns. HSA Proceedings fiom 13th Annual Conference in Hydroponics.
Orlando, FL, 1992, pp 8- 17.
Schuerger AC, Mitchell DJ (1992) Effects of temperature, hydrogen ion concentration,
humidity and light quality on disease caused by Fusuriurn soiani f. sp. phaseoli in
mung bean. Can. J. Bot. 70: 1798- 1808.
Schwartzkopf SA, Dudzinski D, Minners RS (1987) The effects of nutient solution
sterilzation on the growth and yield of hydroponicaily gown lettuce. HortScience
22 (5): 873-874.
Sharkey T ( 1984) Transpiration-induced changes in the photosynthetic capacity of leaves.
Planta 160: 143- 1 50.
Shtienberg D (1992) Effects of foliar diseases on gas exchange processes:
study. Phytopath. 82: 760-765.
Stanghellini M, Kronland W (1986) Yield loss in hydroponically grown 1'
A comparative
ettuce
aaributed to subclinical infection of feeder rootlets by Pythium dissotocum. Plant
Disease 70: 1053- 1056.
Stanghellini LM, Rasmussen S (1994) Hydroponics: a solution for zoosporic pathogens.
Plant Disease 78 (12): 1129-1 138.
Stanghellini M, Stowell L, Bates M (1984) Control of root rot of spinach caused by
Pyliitrm aphanidermaium in a recirculating hydroponic system by ultraviolet
irradiation. Plant Disease 68: 1075- 1076.
Stanghellini ME (1988) Root diseases in hydroponically grown plants. HSA Proceedings
Ninth Annual Conference. San Francisco, 1988, pp 33-39.
Steudle E ( 1989) Water transport in roots. In B Loughman, O Gasparikova, J Kolek, eds,
Structural and functional aspects of transport in roots, V.36 of Developments in
Plants and Soi1 Sciences. 3rd International Symposium on Shucnire and Function
of Roots. Nitra, Czechoslovakia, 3-7 Aug, 1987, pp 139- 145.
Strayer R (1 994) Dynamics of rnicroorganism populations in recirculating nutrient
121
solutions. Adv. Space. Res. 14 (1 1): (1 1)357-(11)366.
Sutton J, Yu H, Grodzinski B, Johnstone M (2000) Relationships of ultraviolet
radiation dose and inactivation of pathogen propagules in water and hydroponic
nutrient solutions. Cm. J. Plant Pathol. 22: 300-309.
Taiz L, Zeiger E (1998) Plant Physiology 2nd Edition. Sinauer Associates, Inc.,
Sunderland, MA, 1 998.
Takahnshi M (1958) S ~ d i e s on the damping-off disease of seedlings caused by pythious
fùngi with special reference to mechanism of disease resistance due to active
antibiosis of protoplasm. Bulletin of the University of Osaka Prefeclrure 8:
127- 167. Series B: Agriculture and Biology. The University of Osaka Prefecture,
Sakai, Osaka, Japan.
van Os E, Amsing J, van Kuik A, Wiliers H (1999) Slow sand filtration: a potential
method for the elimination of pathogens and nematodes in recirculating nutrient
solutions from glasshouse-grown crops. In Acta Hort. 481:s 19-525.
Vanachter A, Thys L, Van Wambeke E, Van Assche C. (1988) Possible use of ozon for
disinfestation of plant nutrient solutions. In Acta Hort. 221: 295-302.
Vestergrrd B (1988) Stenlization of water and nutrient solutions. In Acta Hort. 221:
303-3 13.
von Caemmerer S, Farquhar G (198 1) Some relationships between the biochemistry of
photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153: 376-387.
Weiler R (2000) UTP Welding Supply. Information on silver solder composition.
Personal communication, Aug 15.2000.
Wheeler R, Mackowiak C, Sager J, Yorio N, Knoa W, Berry W (1994) Growth and
gas exchange by lettuce stands in a closed, controlled environment. J. Amer. Soc.
Hort. Sci. 1 19 (3): 6 10-6 15.
White G (1998) DNA lifts the veil on Pyihiurn. Grower 129 (7): 28-30.
Wohanka W (1992) Slow sand filtration and W radiation: low-cost techniques for
disinfection of recirculating nutrient solution or surface water. ISOSC
Proceedings, 1992.
Woolhouse H (1983) Toxicity and Tolerance in the Responses of Plants to Metals. In O
Lange, P Nobel, C Osmond, H Ziegler, eds, Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology
New Senes Vol 12C. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 245-283.
Wulff E, Pham A, Cherif M, Rey P, Tirilly Y, Hockenhull J (1998) inoculation of
cucumber roots with zoospores of rnycoparasitic and plant pathogenic Pyhium
species: Differential zoospore accumulation, colonization ability and plant growh
response. Etrr. J. Plans Path. 104: 69-76.
Yamamoto H, Teradr T, Naganawa T (1990) Disinfectious effect of ozonation on water
infested with several root-infecting parhogens. Ann. Phdvtopath. Soc. Jupan 56:
250-25 1.
Zhang W, Tu J ( 1 999) Response of Pythium aphanidermatum zoospores to ultraviolet
radiation in a labontory collimated beam assay. Microbios 97: 19-28.
Zhang W, Tu J (2000) Effect of ultraviolet disinfection of hydroponic solutions on
Pythium root rot and non-target bactena. Eur. J. Plant Path. 106: 4 15-42 1.
Zinnen T (1 988) Assessrnent of plant diseases in hyàroponic culture. Planî Diseuse 72
(2): 96-99.
Appendix 1. Correlation of Nondestructive SPAD Measuremeats of Leaf
HGreenness9' with Extractable Chlorophyll Content
14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
SPAD Values
Figure 1. Relationship of SPAD measurements to total chlorophyll content of Bella Green lettuce, extracted with DMF and expressed on a leaf area basis. Each point represents the mean of 6 SPAD values per leaf; 4 leaves per plant were measured. ~'0.85 1 for the fitted second order polynornial function.
AppendLu 2. SAS Program for Calculation of Leaf Physiological Parameters
I* This program calculates photosynthesis and transpiration rates, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration,
for Dr. Grodzinski's leaf gas exchange system.
By Demos Leonardos */
Options 1s = 90;
Data A; In fi le1C:WyFiles\May99.prn'; Input Date S plant S DTreat Ptreat Block Chamber CO2Conc ChamTemp LeafTemp
FlowRate LeafArea CO2Diff DewSam DewRefer;
!* input variables must be in the following units: COZConc and CO2Diff (ppm), ChamTemp, LeafTemp and AirTemp (OC), FlowRate (mumin), LeafArea (cm2), and DewSam and DewRefer (OC) */
i'* Conversion of leaf area Crom cm2 to m2 */ LeafArea = LeafArea * 1 O**-4;
/* Conversion of flow rate from ml/min to m3/s */ FlowRate = FlowRate * 16.67 * 10**-9;
i* Density of pure CO2 corrected for temperature (pmoVrn3) */ COZDens = ,044643 * (273 / (ChamTemp + 273)) * 10**9;
/* Conversion of CO2Diff fiom ppm to m3/m3 */ C02Diff = C02Diff * IO**-6;
!* Calculation of photosynthesis rate (pmoVmUs) */ Pn = (FlowRate * CO2Dens * COZDifY) / LeafArea;
i* Vapour pressures (kPa) - Tetens equation's */ VPSam = 6.10800 1 * EXP((17.27 * DewSam) / (DewSam + 237.3)) * . l ; VPRefer = 6.10800 1 * E n ( ( 17.27 * DewRefer) / @ewRefer + 237.3)) * . l ; VPLeaf = 6.108001 * EXP((17.27 * Leaffemp) / (Leaffemp + 237.3)) * .1; VPCham = 6.108001 * EXP((17.27 * CharnTemp) / (ChamTemp + 237.3)) * . l ;
/* Vapour pressure for air over leaf wa) */ VPAir = (VPSam + VPRefer) / 2;
/* Saturation vapour pressure difference between leaf and air (kPa) */ SVPD = VPLeaf - VPAir;
/* Water densities (mmoYm3) */ WatRefer = ((VPRefer / ((273 + ChamTemp) * 4.62)) * 10**7) 1 18; WatSam = ((VPSam / ((273 + ChamTemp) * 4.62)) * 10**7) 1 18; WatLeaf = ((VPLeaf / ((273 + Leafi'emp) * 4.62)) * 1 O**7) 1 18;
!* Calculation of transpiration rate (mmoVmZ/s) */ E = (WatSam - WatRefer) * (FlowRate / LeafArea);
!* Water Use Efficiency (pmol CO2 / mm01 H20) *I WUE = Pn/ E;
:* Atrnospheric pressure (kPa) */ AtmPres = 10 1.325;
.'* Calculation of stomatal conductance for HZ0 (mmoVm2/s) */ GHz0 = (E * (AtmPres - (VPLeaf + VPAir) / 2)) 1 (VPLeaf - VPAir);
i* Calculation of stomatal conductance for CO2 (mmoVmZ/s) */ GC02 = GHz0 / 1.6;
i* Concentration of CO2 over leaf (m3/m3) */ C02Air = ((COZConc + (CO2Conc - (COZDiff * 10**6))) / 2) * IO**-6;
i* Calculation of intercellular CO2 concentration @pm) */ Ci = ((((GCOZ - (E 1 2 ) ) * CO2Air) - (Pn * IO**-3)) / (GCOZ + (E 12))) * 10**6;