GANP ASBU Symposium 2017 - Arab Civil Aviation Organization · Chair of EUROCAE/RTCA, AIS Data Link committee EAD (European AIS Database) Migration & Transition Manager Project Manager

GANP ASBU Symposium 2017ICAO EUR NAT Office and ACACTunis, Tunisia 27-30 March 2017

Session 3:EUROCONTROL & ICAO Regional Monitoring Mechanism

Ana Paula FRANGOLHOEUROCONTROL

EUROCONTROL DPS/PEPR

WHO AM I? Ana Paula FRANGOLHO

Background/CV in a nutshell:More than 17 years in EUROCONTROL:

DPS/PEPR Unit (since Fev 2011) LSSIP Contact person (RO,BG,MD and UA) Advisor for Objectives (ADQ, INF, SWIM, TOD) ICAO Monitoring & Reporting SESAR Deployment Coordinator Methods and Quality

SESAR WPB (Target Concept and Architecture) Task Leader Working in cooperation with WPC.2 (Deployment) and WPC.3 (standardisation &

regulatory roadmap) AIM (Aeronautical Information Management) and SWIM

Development of Information Management Strategy, SWIM and AIM Action Plan Managing AIM activity in DMEAN Secretary of the Aeronautical Information Team

Chair of EUROCAE/RTCA, AIS Data Link committee EAD (European AIS Database) Migration & Transition Manager Project Manager – AHEAD Programme

About 19 years NAV Portugal Project Manager- GNSS (EGNOS), ATC, COM, AIS Advisor and representative in ICAO and EUROCONTROL fora

GANP ASBU Symposium, Tunisia March 2017 2

3

Agenda

GANP ASBU Symposium, Tunisia March 2017

1. Background of ESSIP/LSSIP

2. ESSIP/LSSIP serving ICAO EUR/NAT

3. Monitoring Reports

4. Lessons learnt

5. Process for reference period 2016

The European ATM Master Plan – Highlights

5

Click on the link to access European ATM Portal: https://www.eatmportal.eu/working/

Updated in 2015

Under the governance of SJU, with a dedicated Project for its Maintenance, and led by EUROCONTROL

(Next update planned end 2019)


https://www.eatmportal.eu/working/

The Master Plan Level 3 Implementation view


The European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (MP L3) Implementation view consists of two closely related parts – Plan and Report – and is complemented by States Local Single Sky Implementation (LSSIP).

The Implementation Plan is a performance-oriented process that describes the common implementation actions required to improve the European ATM network over the next five to seven years. It does this in the form of Implementation Objectives and Stakeholder Lines of Action which define what has to be done, why, how, when, where and by whom.

The Implementation Report consolidates of the local implementation plans and annual progress reports, provides an overview of implementation and identifies the delays in implementation at European level.

This overview helps to focus the analysis on the most critical implementation delays and to prepare for appropriate remedial actions, thus closing the loop between implementation monitoring and implementation planning.

The MP L3 Implementation view & ESSIP/LSSIP Mechanism

7

MP L3 Plan

LSSIP documents(41 States+

MUAC)

MP L3 Report

Level 3 of the Master Plan = [MP L3 Plan + MP L3 Report]

Only mature and essentialATM Solutions, for which there is a

need of a European monitoring

Few Network Strategy Plan elements

Implementing Rules prerequisite

to deployment


ESSIP/LSSIP Mechanism

8

MP L3 Plan


From the ATM Master Plan, implementation actions are derived, which in turn are the main drivers for the SES Implementation

The Implementation Plan is based on and covers the ATM MP (including the SDM’s Deployment ProgrammeATM functionalities) and where needed some elements of the Network Strategy Plan, SES Interoperability regulations (8.33, Datalink Service,..).

It is under the governance of SJU (with a dedicated Project for its maintenance and through the Master Planning Committee), and EUROCONTROL Provisional Council

8


9

MP L3 Plan


MUAC)


The Local Single Sky Implementation (LSSIP) provides a ”Reality check” on the MP L3 Plan, as reported by National Stakeholders, who sign and commit to the report documents.For each ECAC State (+ MUAC), the LSSIP delivers one document containing the local implementation plan and progress report.The LSSIP reports present the review of the situation at the end of the calendar year, the evolution over the past year, and the plans for next years until achievement of each individual Implementation Objective.

LSSIP process is also extended to the whole ICAO EUR region: directly used for ECAC States with questionnaire for other

ICAO EUR States

9


10

MP L3 Plan


MUAC)

MP L3 Report


The MP L3 Implementation Report is the official Master Plan reporting deliverable that gives an overview of progress for all implementation objectives represented in the MP L3 Implementation Plan.

10

MP L3 Plan Document – ESSIP Plan –Implementation view

11

Click here to access

Plans for next 5-7 years The MP L3 Implementation Plan is

updated every year. Official deliverable of SJU and

EUROCONTROL

MP L3 Plan includes:Implementation Objectives Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs)

For the year 2016 cycle, there are 44 Implementation Objectives of which: 33 related to SESAR DP 33 related to ICAO GANP (not the

same as the DP ones)


http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/reports/2016-masterplan-implementationplan.pdf

http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/reports/2016-masterplan-implementationplan.pdf

12

Click here to access LSSIP Documents


Planning and Reporting Tool

For all National Stakeholders

Annual documents, based on MP L3 Plan = fact finding on real progress and plans

42 Documents (one per each continental ECAC state + MUAC)

Azerbaijan is not a ECTL member State but participates as well in the LSSIP monitoring

Level 1 – High Level View on the National ATM situation (Public part)Level 2 – Details on progress and plans of all Implementation Objectives

(Restricted part)

LSSIP Documents

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

LSSIP Documents

13

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents are the expression of the commitment of civil and military National Organisations (Regulators and National Supervisory Authorities), Service Providers and Airport Operators, towards the implementation of the European ATM Master Plan.

They provide a comprehensive view, for the benefit of the ATM community at large, of how ECAC States and concerned Stakeholders are progressing in planning and deploying the mature elements of the ATM Master Plan, as identified as Implementation Objectives in its Level 3. They constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve these and to improve the performance of their national ATM System.

The MP L3/LSSIP is a well-established and mature mechanism, with a long history dating back more than 20 years ago, named Convergence & Implementation Program (CIP).

The LSSIP document – Year 20xx describes the situation in the State at the end of December 20xx.


LSSIP Tools: Database

14GANP ASBU Symposium, Tunisia March 2017

There are 300+ users of the Database

An Electronic Database is used to access and report on Implementation Progress

LSSIP Database: Current Users / Use


At Global level

At EU level

At local level

Institutions Purpose

ANSPs, Airspace Users, Airport Operators, Military Authorities

For development of business plans, for monitoring the progress, for synchronisedregional/ Functional airspace Blocks (FAB) development

State Aviation Departments, Aviation Authorities; Military Authorities

For monitoring, oversight purposes

Institutions Purpose

ICAO EUR office GANP/ASBU monitoring

Bodies/organisations Purpose

SJU For the ECAC states monitoring purposes

To provide a holistic roll-out plan for the SESAR seen as a whole and to ensure alignment of other implementation/programme plans (such as the SESAR Deployment Programme or the NextGen implementation Plan) with the Master Plan

SDM To ensure the appropriate link between the Deployment Programme and the Master Plan, especially PCP elements.

Performance Review Body (PRB) To support the assessment of CAPEX

European Defence Agency (EDA) EDA in cooperation with NATO and EUROCONTROL military unit uses LSSIP reports to collect information on military systems and infrastructure to support the military input to the Master Plan, and to support the operational and financial impact analysis of its implementation for the military community.

EUROCONTROL/NM

LSSIP Tools: Map View


LSSIP Maps, Evolution charts & Progress reports are available on the EATM Portal: https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/depl/essip_objectives/monitoring

Map views and Evolution charts facilitates the presentation of overall implementation progress

https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/depl/essip_objectives/monitoring

17

ECAC-wide implementation Progress Assessment

The MP L3 Report provides a holistic view of the implementation of commonly agreed actions to be taken by ECAC States

MP L3 Report is based mainly on LSSIP data

Provides different views of implementation (Strategic, Deployment, FAB, State centric View)

The MP L3 Report is produced annually, developed in close cooperation with the SJU and SESAR partners.

The MP L3 2015 Implementation Report (latest edition) is based on the MP L3 Implementation Plan that included 41 implementation objectives.


The MP L3 Report

Click here to access

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3-implementation-report

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3-implementation-report

Stakeholders Roles – States


Furthermore, EUROCONTROL Member States are under the obligation to:

Report on the progress of the implementation of the MP L3 Plan;

Report to ICAO-EUR on the progress towards the implementation of the ICAOGlobal Air Navigation Plan (GANP) Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBUs).

This is done through the LSSIP process and related National LSSIP documents.

STATE RESPONSIBILITIES IN MONITORING ATM DEPLOYMENT

NSAs while representing the States have multiple responsibilities that are inrelation to the implementation of appropriate functionalities while building andfurther developing the European ATM system.These include : Ensure oversight of changes; Draw up of performance plans, performance oversight and monitoring of

implementation of performance plans and targets achieving processes; Ensure support to EC as described in Commission Regulation 409/2013 for

the setting up of the SESAR Deployment (SD) Governance; Ensure coordination with the SDM as described in Commission Regulation

409/2013 for the setting up of the SD Governance; Monitor investments in ATM, including activities related to Common Projects.

Planning/Reporting cycles – Years to come


The process also includes: yearly satisfaction survey, lessons learned to improve process, quality of information, data usability and accessibility, and cross-feeding with/to other sources

19

A full planning & reporting cycle takes two years. This means that at any time there at 2 cycles in progress:The diagram below shows where we are near the end of year 2016, and what cycles are operational:

In a nutshellThe ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism is:

Unique ATM Implementation & Monitoring process throughout entire ECAC

Exists for more than 20 years Has been continuously adapting in the past, and will

be in the future Is performed through contact between dedicated

Contact Persons (Agency) and Focal Points (national stakeholders)

Is by nature annual, with fixed milestones In line with ATM Master Plan, ICAO GANP, etc. Pragmatic, cost efficient, full-cycle


ATM Master Plan Portal


https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/



EUROCONTROL DPS/PEPRSite


https://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

23

Agenda





4. Lessons learnt


EANPG decisions

EANPG /55 agreed that a cooperative mechanism would be put in place between ICAO and EUROCONTROL.

This mechanism would encompass the utilisation of the EUROCONTROL ESSIP/LSSIP process complemented by a specific ICAO EUR ASBU questionnaire, in an effort to avoid duplication of reporting.

EANPG/55 - the ASBU Block 0 Modules prioritisation table, as provided in Appendix G to EANPG/55 report, was endorsed as the initial version of the EUR ASBU Implementation Plan, which presents a link between ICAO ASBU B0 Modules and ESSIP Objectives and establishes a basis for the reporting mechanisms of the EUR/NAT Region.


EUROCONTROL and ICAO/RO working together

Reporting mechanism already existing in the European region,namely ESSIP/LSSIP, to be re-used in order to prepare a report forICAO HQ on ASBU implementation.

For ECAC States there was no double reporting issue - as all theinformation was extracted from ESSIP/LSSIP process.

For non-ECAC States reporting burden limited to minimum withspecific guidance provided by EUROCONTROL.

First report on ASBU implementation in ICAO EUR Region covering41 ECAC and 4 non-ECAC States, produced April 2015

A very good example of cooperation between two internationalorganisations where mechanisms already existing in the Europeanregion were re-used to prepare a report for ICAO


EUROCONTROL and ICAO/RO working togetherEANPG/58

• Confirmed that reporting is linked to existing mechanisms (ESSIP/LSSIP) and enhanced (ATMGE) questionnaires to avoid double reporting from stakeholders

• Noted that the number and quality of the replies received from the questionnaire represented a considerable improvement in relation to the information obtained on the previous year

• Proposed inclusion of two additional modules B0 CCO and B0 AMET into the implementation monitoring mechanisms for the 2016 reference period

• Invited the States, which are not covered by the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, to provide their responses by using the updated and revised questionnaires


EANPG 58 -

Obligation for States to report the status of their ASBU implementationwill continue with annual EANPG endorsement.

Highlighted that as the Global Air Navigation Plan requires States to report the status of their ASBU implementation, the ASBU monitoring report is a key document for the EANPG to monitor and analyse the ASBU implementation within the EUR Region.

Report is part of eANP Vol III and also be part of the ICAO Global Air Navigation Report.



Mapping of ESSP Objectives and ASBUs

ASBU Block 0 Priority 1 Modules

Objective designator (ESSIP) Other Block 0 Modules Objective designator

(ESSIP)

B0-ACAS ATC16 B0-ACDM AOP05

B0-APTA NAV10 B0-ASUR ITY-SPI

B0-DATM INF04 B0-CDO ENV01

ITY-ADQ NAV03

B0-FICE

ATC17 B0-FRTO AOM19.1

ITY-COTR NAV03

ITY-FMTP B0-NOPS FCM01

B0-SNET ATC02.2 FCM03

ATC02.8 B0-RSEQ ATC07.1

B0-SURF AOP04.1 ATC15.1

AOP04.2 B0-TBO ITY-AGDL

31

Agenda





4. Lessons learnt


ICAO ASBU Implementation Monitoring Reports

A first Monitoring report, reference period 2014, wasdeveloped in partnership EUROCONTROL & ICAOEUR RO

EANPG in Nov 2015 endorsed the Report. It was recognised the need to involve more States

and strengthen monitoring. 8 States did not provide monitoring data

This report is still available on EUROCONTROL website:

http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/reports/2014-icao-report.pdf




ASBU Implementation Monitoring Report

A second Monitoring report, reference period 2015. It was recognised the need to involve more States and strengthen

monitoring. 3 States did not provide monitoring data

EANPG/58 endorsed the Report.

Will be the explained in detail at nextpresentation


35

Agenda





4. Lessons learnt


Some “Lessons learnt”

1. Start small, then grow

2. Look for a coordination body / bodies

3. Give maximum guidance – on process AND oncontent

4. Adapt to the specific circumstances of country /region / environment / circumstances


Some “Lessons learnt”

5. It is no shame if an issue is not planned to beimplemented–but it should be properly explained

6. However, plans always slip so take it intoaccount

7. Focus on progress but also on plans to fill thegap

8. Be pragmatic


38

Agenda





4. Lessons learnt


LSSIP cycle 2016 – Process and Status

Collection of information took place from Mid October 2016 until Mid February 2017 for 41 States Based on ESSIP Plan 2016 Covered detailed progress (at level of Stakeholder Line of Action)

LSSIP database was closed on 16 February 2017 and information frozen

Based, amongst others, on that information we are finalising individual LSSIP document for each of the 41 States These documents will be officially signed by State authorities from the

different organisations involved (ANSP, Regulators, Airports, Military) Information from LSSIP database will be used to prepare ASBU

Implementation Monitoring Report reference period 2016


For those outside LSSIP process --- What is expected?

Nomination of a Focal Point for monitoring aspects that will act as the interface between State and ICAO EUR RO

On an annual basis: Filling in the questionnaire in due time

Internal coordination inside the State is needed to collect information from different ATM areas of activity

Complete the State report with remaining information and send it to ICAO (latest by May 2017)

All ICAO EUR States are requested to report Preparation of the ASBUs Monitoring report is done by

EUROCONTROL We need information from ALL States even if the level of

granularity is different


Process used to prepare next report

For ECAC States information from LSSIP database is used -- it's a do nothing scenario (no double reporting)

Preparation of data for the cycle started in November 2016

Reference date for the input - Dec 2016 Information from non ECAC States is collected using the

questionnaire – explained in detail in a next presentation States are requested to fill in the questionnaire giving

'high level' data for each of objectives addressed, latest by end of May

Report(reference period 2016) will be prepared during summer and presented at next EANPG/59.


Why are we doing this, why is monitoring needed?

Create a global picture of GANP implementation, at ICAO EUR/NAT Region and progressively on a global worldwide basis

Ensure that harmonisation and interoperability are achieved through a steady, uniform and coordinated implementation approach based on a global plan (GANP)

Understand issues and problems in the implementation process Analyse trends and difficulties Analyse areas to improve or change Provide feedback to the GANP for possible adjustments and

improvements

“What you can measure, you can manage”


Ana Paula FRANGOLHODPS/PEPR - EUROCONTROL

http://www.eurocontrol.inthttp://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

Questions?

http://www.eurocontrol.int/

http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr