Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GACC Feedback Sessions Fall 2014
2
Overview of IRWIN 2014 Production 2015 and beyond
Bumps, Successes and Impacts of IRWIN
Incidents in IRWIN via the Observer Q&A
Reduce redundant data entry
Identify Authoritative Data Sources for
operational data
Improve the consistency and quality of wildland
fire data
Speed access to data from diverse source
systems
PROJECT GOALS
4
May 20, 2014Five applications reading and writing data
WildCAD Integrated Fire Management (IFM) (AK DNR CAD) FireCode WFDSS Sit209
2014 PRODUCTION
5
Read Only applications Enterprise Geospatial Portal (EGP) Remote Sensing Applications Center (RSAC) Ventura County Fire Department Kern County Fire District Keno Fire Protection District Situation Analyst Montana
2014 PRODUCTION
6
Read Only in Development Smart Fire (USFS) USFS Air Quality Program CalFire Governor's Report Utah Department of Natural Resources Colorado Division of Fire Prevention and Control UC Davis NOAA
2014 PRODUCTION
7
CADS FireBeans (AK Fire Service) Dispatch Tracker (TX FS)
ROSS (Header Data ONLY)e-ISuite (excluding Resource Data)Read Only
Fire Management Information Tool (FMIT)* GeoMac* InciWeb*
Additional data elements from 209 & FireCodeIRWIN Observer and Admin Tools
2015 PLANNED PRODUCTION
8
Federal Final Fire Reporting Systems FireStat - FS Fire Reporting WFMI - NPS Fire Reporting WFMI - BLM Fire Reporting WFMI - BIA Fire Reporting FMIS - FWS Fire Reporting
State of Washington Fire ReportingNational Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) –
US Fire Administration (?)FamWeb Data Warehouse
2016 PLANNED PRODUCTION
Resource Data ROSS Multiple CADs e-ISuite ICS 209
Weather Data WIMS ROMAN WFMI Weather
Fuels Treatment Data NFPORS FACTS IFT-DSS
2017 PLANNED PRODUCTION
FEEDBACK
IRWIN IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
Users adapting to a data exchange environmentFireCode implementation
No WildCAD Issuing multiple FireCodes Incomplete implementation of Conflict Resolution Locking records Contract challenges
BUMPS THIS YEAR
WildCAD IT Security approval delays Scheduling IT Support for installation FireCode impact
Multiple FireCodes Fire Season
BUMPS THIS YEAR
Users adapting to a data exchange environmentExtended Team OwnershipWFDSSThe Surprise….Complexes?!?!
STANDOUTS THIS YEAR
15
Standardization of data across applications Fields that use Unit IDs
Owner, Jurisdictional, Responsible, Protecting, Responding,
Requires NWCG define terms in relationship to each other
Requires refinement of NWCG Data Standards
IRWIN IMPACTS & ISSUES
18
Geospatial Data GeoMac, EGP, FIMT, ftp site, WFDSS, InciWeb, etc Authoritative Data Layers NWCG Geospatial Subcommittee to solve
IRWIN IMPACTS & ISSUES
19
FireCode ID BLM, Region 1 & 4, Idaho Dept of Lands Change to FireCode User Guide in June
Responsible to Jurisdictional/ Protecting Recommendations:
Establish FireCode oversight body / change management board Update to add Jurisdictional and Protecting Consider Fiscally Responsible Unit Clarify business rules and definitions
IRWIN IMPACTS & ISSUES
20
Data Management for Complexes Need common guidance adopted by all agencies Examples in IRWIN move the discussion forward Group meeting Sept 10-11
Recommendations: Complex parent is not a wildfire itself
Created just to group incidents Child incidents retain uniqueness in all applications
IRWIN IMPACTS & ISSUES
21
Resources Need standards for naming and identifying individual
resources across CADs, ROSS, eISuite, ICS209 and IRWIN
IRWIN IMPACTS & ISSUES
Requirements User authentication and roles Tools for detecting and resolving data quality issues Business view vs. Developer tools
IRWIN OBSERVER
Irwinoat.doi.gov/audit/#!/
http://irwinoat.doi.gov/audit_1.2.1/#!/
23
IRWIN PROJECT CONTACTS
Chris MarkleIRWIN Project [email protected]
Roshelle PedersonIRWIN Business [email protected]
Jaymee FotjikIRWIN Associate Project [email protected]
